Optociliary Shunt Vessels or Neovascularisation of the Optic Disc: Fluorescein Angiography Versus Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.

A 56-year-old man with a history of gallbladder carcinoma, hypothyroidism and hypertension was examined by us after developing marked visual loss in his left eye. A left ischaemic type of central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) with macular oedema was diagnosed. Three months later, a non-ischaemic type of CRVO with no macular oedema developed in his right eye. While the left eye received five intravitreal ranibizumab injections and panretinal photocoagulation, the right central retinal vein occlusion improved spontaneously without any treatment. Ten months after his first visit we noticed optociliary shunt vessel formation in the right eye and neovascularisation of the optic disc in the left eye. Fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography angiography were performed at the same visit. The place of fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography angiography in distinguishing the optociliary shunt vessel from neovascularisation of the optic disc is discussed.

The Caliber of Optociliary Shunt Vessels Is Associated with Macular Blood Flow and Visual Acuity in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion.

Purpose: To define the role of optociliary shunt vessels (OSVs) in eyes with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) using OCT angiography (OCTA) with macular parameters. Design: Retrospective, observational, consecutive case series. Participants: Forty-one eyes in 38 consecutive patients with CRVO were analyzed in this study. Methods: Optic disc and macula were imaged by swept-source OCTA (3 × 3 mm) as well as by high-quality fundus photography. Main Outcome Measures: We compared macular vessel density (VD) and visual acuity between eyes in which OSVs developed and those in which they did not. Furthermore, we measured the diameter of the OSVs and analyzed the correlation with macular VD and visual acuity. Results: Optociliary shunt vessels were found in 25 eyes (61%). Central retinal vein occlusion with OSVs did not show any statistical difference compared with CRVO without OSVs in either macular VD of the total retina (0.31 ± 0.07 and 0.26 ± 0.09, respectively; P = 0.0937) or final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (0.30 ± 0.43 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] and 0.59 ± 0.54 logMAR, respectively; P = 0.0705). The mean OSV diameter was 71 ± 30 µm in CRVO with OSV. The diameter of the OSVs was correlated positively with superficial VD (r = 0.443; P = 0.027), deep VD (r = 0.494; P = 0.012), and total VD (r = 0.491; P = 0.013). Furthermore, the OSV diameter was also negatively correlated with BCVA (logMAR) at the final visit (r = -0.531; P = 0.006). Conclusions: The results demonstrated that the diameter of the OSVs was associated with macular VD and visual acuity in patients with CRVO. The development of large OSVs on the optic disc may be a good indicator of the maintenance of blood flow in the macula.