Safety and immunogenicity of COReNAPCIN, a SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine, as a fourth heterologous booster in healthy Iranian adults: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 1 clinical trial with a six-month follow-up.

The recurrent COVID-19 infection, despite global vaccination, highlights the need for booster doses. A heterologous booster has been suggested to enhance immunity and protection against emerging variants of concern of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. In this report, we aimed to assess the safety, and immunogenicity of COReNAPCIN, as a fourth booster dose after three doses of inactivated vaccines. METHODS: The study was conducted as a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 1 clinical trial of the mRNA-based vaccine candidate, COReNAPCIN. The vaccine was injected as a heterologous booster in healthy Iranian adults aged 18-50 who had previously received three doses of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. In the study, 30 participants were randomly assigned to receive either COReNAPCIN in two different doses (25 µg and 50 µg) or placebo. The vaccine candidate contained mRNA encoding the complete sequence of the pre-fusion stabilized Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, formulated within lipid nanoparticles. The primary endpoint was safety and the secondary objective was humoral immunogenicity until 6 months post-vaccination. The cellular immunogenicity was pursued as an exploratory outcome. RESULTS: COReNAPCIN was well tolerated in vaccinated individuals in both doses with no life-threatening or other serious adverse events. The most noticeable solicited adverse events were pain at the site of injection, fatigue and myalgia. Regarding the immunogenicity, despite the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies due to the vaccination history for all and previous SARS-CoV-2 infection for some participants, the recipients of 25 and 50 µg COReNAPCIN, two weeks post-vaccination, showed 6·6 and 8·1 fold increase in the level of anti-RBD, and 11·5 and 21·7 fold increase in the level of anti-spike antibody, respectively. The geometric mean virus neutralizing titers reached 10.2 fold in the 25 µg group and 8.4 fold in 50 µg group of pre-boost levels. After 6 months, the measured anti-spike antibody concentration still maintains a geometric mean fold rise of 2.8 and 6.3, comparing the baseline levels in 25 and 50 µg groups, respectively. Additionally, the significant increase in the spike-specific IFN-ϒ T-cell response upon vaccination underscores the activation of cellular immunity. CONCLUSION: COReNAPCIN booster showed favorable safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity profile, supporting its further clinical development (Trial registration: IRCT20230131057293N1).

Repeated intravenous doses of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells for bronchopulmonary dysplasia: results of a phase 1 clinical trial with 2-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is a lack of effective treatments or preventive strategies for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Pre-clinical studies with mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have yielded encouraging results. The safety of administering repeated intravenous doses of umbilical cord tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (UC-MSCs) has not yet been tested in extremely-low-gestational-age newborns (ELGANs). AIMS: to test the safety and feasibility of administering three sequential intravenous doses of UC-MSCs every 7 days to ELGANs at risk of developing BPD. METHODS: In this phase 1 clinical trial, we recruited ELGANs (birth weight ≤1250 g and ≤28 weeks in gestational age [GA]) who were on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) with FiO2 ≥ 0.3 at postnatal days 7-14. Three doses of 5 × 106/kg of UC-MSCs were intravenously administered at weekly intervals. Adverse effects and prematurity-related morbidities were recorded. RESULTS: From April 2019 to July 2020, 10 patients were recruited with a mean GA of 25.2 ± 0.8 weeks and a mean birth weight of 659.8 ± 153.8 g. All patients received three intravenous UC-MSC doses. The first dose was administered at a mean of 16.6 ± 2.9 postnatal days. All patients were diagnosed with BPD. All patients were discharged from the hospital. No deaths or any serious adverse events related to the infusion of UC-MSCs were observed during administration, hospital stays or at 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of repeated intravenous infusion of UC-MSCs in ELGANs at a high risk of developing BPD was feasible and safe in the short- and mid-term follow-up.

Phase 1 study of latozinemab in progranulin-associated frontotemporal dementia.

INTRODUCTION: Heterozygous mutations in the GRN gene lead to reduced progranulin (PGRN) levels in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and are causative of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) with > 90% penetrance. Latozinemab is a human monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 antibody that is being developed to increase PGRN levels in individuals with FTD caused by heterozygous loss-of-function GRN mutations. METHODS: A first-in-human phase 1 study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of multiple-dose intravenous administration of latozinemab in eight symptomatic participants with FTD caused by a heterozygous loss-of-function GRN mutation (FTD-GRN). RESULTS: Latozinemab demonstrated favorable safety and PK/PD profiles. Multiple-dose administration of latozinemab increased plasma and CSF PGRN levels in participants with FTD-GRN to levels that approximated those seen in healthy volunteers. DISCUSSION: Data from the first-in-human phase 1 study support further development of latozinemab for the treatment of FTD-GRN. Highlights: GRN mutations decrease progranulin (PGRN) and cause frontotemporal dementia (FTD).Latozinemab is being developed as a PGRN-elevating therapy.Latozinemab demonstrated a favorable safety profile in a phase 1 clinical trial.Latozinemab increased PGRN levels in the CNS of symptomatic FTD-GRN participants.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics across infusion rates of intravenously administered nipocalimab: results of a phase 1, placebo-controlled study.

Introduction: Nipocalimab is a high-affinity, fully human, aglycosylated, effectorless, immunoglobulin G (IgG) 1 monoclonal antibody that targets the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), decreases systemic IgG including autoantibodies, and is under development in several IgG autoantibody- and alloantibody-mediated diseases, including generalized myasthenia gravis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, maternal-fetal medicine, and multiple other therapeutic areas. An initial phase 1 study with single and multiple ascending doses of nipocalimab infused intravenously (IV) over 2 h demonstrated dose-dependent serum pharmacokinetics and IgG reductions, with an adverse event (AE) profile comparable to placebo. Methods: The current investigation evaluates the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single doses of nipocalimab across various IV infusion rates in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential-dose study. Forty participants were randomized to receive nipocalimab 30 mg/kg over 60, 30, 15 or 7.5 min (0.5, 1, 2, or 4 mg/kg/min); nipocalimab 60 mg/kg over 15 min (4 mg/kg/min); or matching placebo. Results: At doses up to 60 mg/kg and infusion rates up to 4 mg/kg/min (maximum clinically feasible rate), single doses of nipocalimab were tolerable, with 12 (40%) participants experiencing AEs across nipocalimab cohorts compared with 1 (10%) participant in the placebo cohort. AEs deemed treatment related occurred in 6 (20%) participants receiving nipocalimab and 1 (10%) participant receiving placebo. None of the AEs were severe, and no participants discontinued treatment due to AEs. Nipocalimab provided consistent, dose-dependent serum pharmacokinetics and IgG reductions, regardless of infusion rate. Discussion: This study supports the use of shortened durations of nipocalimab infusion for future studies.

Phase 1 trial supports safety and mechanism of action of peptide immunotherapy for peanut allergy.

BACKGROUND: Food allergy is a leading cause of anaphylaxis worldwide. Allergen-specific immunotherapy is the only treatment shown to modify the natural history of allergic disease, but application to food allergy has been hindered by risk of severe allergic reactions and short-lived efficacy. Allergen-derived peptides could provide a solution. PVX108 comprises seven short peptides representing immunodominant T-cell epitopes of major peanut allergens for treatment of peanut allergy. METHODS: Pre-clinical safety of PVX108 was assessed using ex vivo basophil activation tests (n = 185). Clinical safety and tolerability of single and repeat PVX108 doses were evaluated in a first-in-human, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in peanut-allergic adults (46 active, 21 placebo). The repeat-dose cohort received six doses over 16 weeks with safety monitored to 21 weeks. Exploratory immunological analyses were performed at pre-dose, Week 21 and Month 18 after treatment. RESULTS: PVX108 induced negligible activation of peanut-sensitised basophils. PVX108 was safe and well tolerated in peanut-allergic adults. There were no treatment-related hypersensitivity events or AEs of clinical concern. The only events occurring more frequently in active than placebo were mild injection site reactions. Exploratory immunological analyses revealed a decrease in the ratio of ST2+ Th2A:CCR6+ Th17-like cells within the peanut-reactive Th pool which strengthened following treatment. CONCLUSION: This study supports the concept that PVX108 could provide a safe alternative to whole peanut immunotherapies and provides evidence of durable peanut-specific T-cell modulation. Translation of these findings to clinical efficacy in ongoing Phase 2 trials would provide important proof-of-concept for using peptides to treat food allergy.

Safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant oligomeric gp145 subtype C Env protein (gp145 C.6980) HIV vaccine candidate in healthy, HIV-1-uninfected adult participants in the US.

BACKGROUND: An approach to a preventive HIV vaccine is induction of effective broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) and effector binding antibodies (bAbs). Preclinical studies suggest that trimeric envelope (Env) proteins may elicit nAbs, which led to the development of the recombinant gp145 subtype C Env protein (gp145 C.6980) immunogen. HVTN 122 was a Phase 1 trial that evaluated the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of gp145 C.6980 in adults. METHODS: Healthy, HIV-1 seronegative adults received three intramuscular injections of gp145 C.6980 with aluminum hydroxide (alum) at months 0, 2, and 6 at either 300 mcg (high dose, n = 25) or 100 mcg (low dose, n = 15), or placebo/saline (placebo, n = 5). Participants were followed for 12 months. RESULTS: Forty-five participants were enrolled. High and low doses of the study protein were well-tolerated, with mild or moderate reactogenicity commonly reported. Only one adverse event (mild injection site pruritis) in one participant (low dose) was considered product-related; there were no dose-limiting toxicities. High and low dose recipients demonstrated robust bAb responses to vaccine-matched consensus gp140 Env and subtype-matched gp120 Env proteins two weeks post-last vaccination (response rates >90 %), while no responses were detected to a heterologous subtype-matched V1V2 antigen. No significant differences were seen between high and low dose groups. Participants in both experimental arms demonstrated nAb response rates of 76.5 % to a tier 1 virus (MW9635.26), but no responses to tier 2 isolates. Env-specific CD4 + T-cell responses were elicited in 36.4 % of vaccine recipients, without significant differences between groups; no participants demonstrated CD8 + T-cell responses. CONCLUSIONS: Three doses of novel subtype C gp145 Env protein with alum were safe and well-tolerated. Participants demonstrated bAb, Env-specific CD4 + T-cell, and tier 1 nAb responses, but the regimen failed to induce tier 2 or heterologous nAb responses. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03382418.

Evaluation of a stabilized RSV pre-fusion F mRNA vaccine: Preclinical studies and Phase 1 clinical testing in healthy adults.

Human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes a substantial proportion of respiratory tract infections worldwide. Although RSV reinfections occur throughout life, older adults, particularly those with underlying comorbidities, are at risk for severe complications from RSV. There is no RSV vaccine available to date, and treatment of RSV in adults is largely supportive. A correlate of protection for RSV has not yet been established, but antibodies targeting the pre-fusion conformation of the RSV F glycoprotein play an important role in RSV neutralization. We previously reported a Phase 1 study of an mRNA-based vaccine (V171) expressing a pre-fusion-stabilized RSV F protein (mDS-Cav1) in healthy adults. Here, we evaluated an mRNA-based vaccine (V172) expressing a further stabilized RSV pre-fusion F protein (mVRC1). mVRC1 is a single chain version of RSV F with interprotomer disulfides in addition to the stabilizing mutations present in the mDS-Cav1 antigen. The immunogenicity of the two mRNA-based vaccines encoding mVRC1 (V172) or a sequence-optimized version of mDS-Cav1 to improve transcriptional fidelity (V171.2) were compared in RSV-naïve and RSV-experienced African green monkeys (AGMs). V172 induced higher neutralizing antibody titers than V171.2 and demonstrated protection in the AGM challenge model. We conducted a Phase 1, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of 25 µg, 100 µg, 200 µg, or 300 µg of V172 in healthy older adults (60-79 years old; N = 112) and 100 µg, 200 µg, or 300 µg of V172 in healthy younger adults (18-49 years old; N = 48). The primary clinical objectives were to evaluate the safety and tolerability of V172, and the secondary objective was to evaluate RSV serum neutralization titers. The most commonly reported solicited adverse events were injection-site pain, injection-site swelling, headache, and tiredness. V172 was generally well tolerated in older and younger adults and increased serum neutralizing antibody titers, pre-fusion F-specific competing antibody titers, and RSV F-specific T-cell responses.

Latozinemab, a novel progranulin-elevating therapy for frontotemporal dementia.

BACKGROUND: Heterozygous loss-of-function mutations in the progranulin (PGRN) gene (GRN) cause a reduction in PGRN and lead to the development of frontotemporal dementia (FTD-GRN). PGRN is a secreted lysosomal chaperone, immune regulator, and neuronal survival factor that is shuttled to the lysosome through multiple receptors, including sortilin. Here, we report the characterization of latozinemab, a human monoclonal antibody that decreases the levels of sortilin, which is expressed on myeloid and neuronal cells and shuttles PGRN to the lysosome for degradation, and blocks its interaction with PGRN. METHODS: In vitro characterization studies were first performed to assess the mechanism of action of latozinemab. After the in vitro studies, a series of in vivo studies were performed to assess the efficacy of a mouse-cross reactive anti-sortilin antibody and the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of latozinemab in nonhuman primates and humans. RESULTS: In a mouse model of FTD-GRN, the rodent cross-reactive anti-sortilin antibody, S15JG, decreased total sortilin levels in white blood cell (WBC) lysates, restored PGRN to normal levels in plasma, and rescued a behavioral deficit. In cynomolgus monkeys, latozinemab decreased sortilin levels in WBCs and concomitantly increased plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) PGRN by 2- to threefold. Finally, in a first-in-human phase 1 clinical trial, a single infusion of latozinemab caused a reduction in WBC sortilin, tripled plasma PGRN and doubled CSF PGRN in healthy volunteers, and restored PGRN to physiological levels in asymptomatic GRN mutation carriers. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the development of latozinemab for the treatment of FTD-GRN and other neurodegenerative diseases where elevation of PGRN may be beneficial. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03636204. Registered on 17 August 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03636204 .

Safety and immunogenicity of an Escherichia coli-produced 9-valent human papillomavirus L1 virus-like particle vaccine (types 6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58) in healthy adults: an open-label, dose-escalation phase 1 clinical trial.

Background: A safe and highly efficacious Escherichia coli (E. coli)-produced HPV 16/18 bivalent vaccine has been prequalified by the World Health Organization. Here, we conducted a single-center, open-label, dose-escalation phase 1 clinical trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the second-generation nonavalent HPV 6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58 vaccine. Method: Twenty-four eligible volunteers aged 18-45 years were enrolled in January 2019 in Dongtai, China and received 0.5 mL (135 µg) or 1.0 mL (270 µg) of the candidate vaccine with a 0/1/6-month dose-escalation schedule. Local and systemic adverse events (AEs) occurring within 30 days after each vaccination and serious adverse events (SAEs) occurring within 7 months were recorded. Blood samples from each participant were collected before and 2 days after the first and third vaccinations to determine changes in laboratory parameters. Serum IgG and neutralizing antibody (nAb) levels against each HPV type at month 7 were analyzed (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03813940). Findings: The incidences of total AEs in the 135 µg and 270 µg groups were 66.7% and 83.3%, respectively. All AEs were mild or moderate, and no SAEs were reported. No clinically significant changes were found in paired blood indices before or after any of the vaccinations. All the participants in the per-protocol set except for two who failed to seroconvert for HPV 11 or 58 in the 135 µg group seroconverted at month 7 for both IgG and nAbs. Interpretation: The candidate E. coli-produced 9vHPV vaccine has been preliminarily proven to be well tolerated and immunogenic, which encourages further studies in large cohorts with a wider age range. Funding: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation, Fujian Province Health and Education Joint Research Program, Xiamen Science and Technology Plan Project, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences of China, and Xiamen Innovax Biotechnology Co., Ltd.

Engineered bacteria to accelerate wound healing: an adaptive, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, first-in-human phase 1 trial.

Background: Impaired wound healing is a growing medical problem and very few approved drugs with documented clinical efficacy are available. CXCL12-expressing lactic acid bacteria, Limosilactobacillus reuteri (ILP100-Topical), has been demonstrated to accelerate wound healing in controlled preclinical models. In this first-in-human study, the primary objective was to determine safety and tolerability of the drug candidate ILP100-Topical, while secondary objectives included assessments of clinical and biologic effects on wound healing by traditionally accepted methods and explorative and traceable assessments. Methods: SITU-SAFE is an adaptive, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, first-in-human phase 1 trial (EudraCT 2019-000680-24) consisting of a single (SAD) and a multiple ascending dose (MAD) part of three dose cohorts each. The study was performed at the Phase 1 Unit, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden. Data in this article were collected between Sep 20th, 2019 and Oct 20th 2021. In total 240 wounds were induced on the upper arms in 36 healthy volunteers. SAD: 12 participants, 4 wounds (2/arm), MAD: 24 participants, 8 wounds (4/arm). Wounds in each participant were randomised to treatment with placebo/saline or ILP100-Topical. Findings: In all individuals and doses, ILP100-Topical was safe and well-tolerated with no systemic exposure. A combined cohort analysis showed a significantly larger proportion of healed wounds (p = 0.020) on Day 32 by multi-dosing of ILP100-Topical when compared to saline/placebo (76% (73/96) and 59% (57/96) healed wounds, respectively). In addition, time to first registered healing was shortened by 6 days on average, and by 10 days at highest dose. ILP100-Topical increased the density of CXCL12+ cells in the wounds and local wound blood perfusion. Interpretation: The favourable safety profile and observed effects on wound healing support continued clinical development of ILP100-Topical for the treatment of complicated wounds in patients. Funding: Ilya Pharma AB (Sponsor), H2020 SME Instrument Phase II (#804438), Knut and Alice Wallenberg foundation.

Phase 1 study of belinostat and adavosertib in patients with relapsed or refractory myeloid malignancies.

PURPOSE: Belinostat is an intravenous histone deacetylase inhibitor with approval for T-cell lymphomas. Adavosertib is a first in class oral Wee1 inhibitor. Preclinical studies of the combination demonstrated synergy in various human acute myeloid leukemia (AML) lines as well as AML xenograft mouse models. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This was a phase 1 dose-escalation study of belinostat and adavosertib in patients with relapsed/refractory AML and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Patients received both drugs on days 1-5 and 8-12 of a 21-day cycle. Safety and toxicity were monitored throughout the study. Plasma levels of both drugs were measured for pharmacokinetic analysis. Response was determined by standard criteria including bone marrow biopsy. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled and treated at 4 dose levels. A grade 4 cytokine release syndrome at dose level 4 (adavosertib 225 mg/day; belinostat 1000 mg/m2) qualified as a dose-limiting toxicity event. The most common non-hematologic treatment-related adverse events were nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dysgeusia, and fatigue. No responses were seen. The study was terminated prior to maximum tolerated dose/recommended phase 2 dose determination. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of belinostat and adavosertib at the tested dose levels was feasible but without efficacy signals in the relapsed/refractory MDS/AML population.

ZB-06, a vaginal film containing an engineered human contraceptive antibody (HC4-N), demonstrates safety and efficacy in a phase 1 postcoital test and safety study.

BACKGROUND: With an unplanned pregnancy rate of 50% or more in many countries, there is an urgent need for contraceptives that are more accessible and acceptable. To meet the growing demand for new contraceptives, ZabBio developed ZB-06, a vaginal film containing HC4-N, a human contraceptive antibody that inactivates sperm. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the potential contraceptive activity of the ZB-06 film using a surrogate assessment for contraceptive efficacy, the postcoital test. We also assessed clinical safety of film use among healthy heterosexual couples. Serum, cervical mucus, and vaginal fluid HC4-N antibody concentrations and sperm agglutination potency were determined after single film use. Changes in the concentration of soluble proinflammatory cytokines and vaginal Nugent score after film use were measured as subclinical safety endpoints. STUDY DESIGN: This was a phase 1, first-in-woman, open-label, proof-of-concept, postcoital test and safety study. RESULTS: A total of 20 healthy women were enrolled in the study, and 8 heterosexual couples completed all study visits. The product was safe for both female participants and their male sexual partners. The postcoital test performed on ovulatory cervical mucus at baseline (no product use) revealed a mean of 25.9 (±30.6) progressively motile sperm per high-power field. After use of a single ZB-06 film before intercourse, this number dropped to 0.04 (±0.06) progressively motile sperm per high-power field (P<.0001). At the follow-up postcoital test visit approximately 1 month later (no product use), a mean of 47.4 (±37.4) progressively motile sperm per high-power field was observed, indicating contraceptive reversibility. CONCLUSION: A single dose of the ZB-06 film applied before intercourse was safe and met efficacy surrogate benchmarks of excluding progressively motile sperm from ovulatory cervical mucus. These data indicate that ZB-06 is a viable contraceptive candidate warranting further development and testing.

D-1553 (Garsorasib), a Potent and Selective Inhibitor of KRASG12C in Patients With NSCLC: Phase 1 Study Results.

INTRODUCTION: D-1553 (garsorasib) is a potent and selective oral KRASG12C inhibitor. We report results from a phase I dose-escalation and dose-expansion study of D-1553 in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC in multiple sites in the People's Republic of China. METHODS: Patients with KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC have administrated D-1553 600 mg orally once daily, 800 mg once daily, 1200 mg once daily, 400 mg twice a day, or 600 mg twice a day in dose escalation. In dose-expansion, all patients received 600 mg twice a day. The safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of D-1553 were evaluated. RESULTS: Among a total of 79 treated patients, 75 patients (94.9%) reported treatment-related adverse events with 30 patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 events (38.0%). Most of the adverse events were manageable and the patients tolerated the study treatment well. Among 74 patients assessable for efficacy analysis, 30 patients had a partial response and 38 had stable disease with a confirmed objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of 40.5% and 91.9%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 8.2 months, and the median duration of response was 7.1 months. Among 62 patients assessable for response at the recommended phase 2 dose, partial response occurred in 24 patients (ORR, 38.7%) and stable disease in 32 patients (DCR, 90.3%). The median progression-free survival and duration of response were 7.6 months and 6.9 months, respectively. In patients with brain metastasis, ORR and DCR were 17% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: D-1553 represents a promising therapeutic option for patients with KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC with a well-tolerated safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity.

FIGHT-102: A phase 1 study of pemigatinib in Japanese patients with advanced malignancies.

BACKGROUND: FIGHT-102 was a phase 1, dose-escalation, dose-expansion study of pemigatinib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Here, we report safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of pemigatinib from FIGHT-102. METHODS: Patients (≥20 years old) self-administered oral pemigatinib 9, 13.5, or 18 mg QD on intermittent dosing (Part 1) or 13.5 mg QD intermittent or continuous dosing (Part 2). A dosing cycle was 21 days (2 weeks on/1 week off or 21 continuous days). Primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints were pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (Part 1, n = 14; Part 2, n = 30) were enrolled; most common tumors, cholangiocarcinoma, n = 8; esophageal, n = 6; 26 patients had confirmed FGF/FGFR alterations (Part 1, n = 3; Part 2, n = 23); 70.5% had ≥3 prior systemic therapies. Maximum tolerated dose was not identified. The recommended phase 2 dosage was determined to be 13.5 mg QD. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were hyperphosphatemia (81.8%), dysgeusia (45.5%), stomatitis (43.2%), and alopecia (38.6%); most frequent Grade ≥3 TEAEs were anemia and decreased appetite (9.1% each). In Part 1, no patient achieved partial response (PR) or complete response, and 7 (50.0%) patients had stable disease (SD). In Part 2, 5 (16.7%) patients achieved PR (one each with cholangiocarcinoma, gall bladder cancer, breast cancer, urothelial tract/bladder cancer, and sweat gland carcinoma) and 6 (20%) had SD. Median duration of response was 9.56 months (95% CI: 4.17, 14.95). CONCLUSIONS: Pemigatinib demonstrated manageable adverse events, consistent pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics profiles, and preliminary efficacy in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.

Safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of Ad26.COV2.S: Results of a phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled COVID-19 vaccine trial in Japan.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of a 2-month homologous booster regimen of Ad26.COV2.S in Japanese adults. METHODS: In this multicenter, placebo-controlled, Phase 1 trial, adults (Cohort 1, aged 20-55 years, N = 125; Cohort 2, aged ≥ 65 years, N = 125) were randomized 2:2:1 to receive Ad26.COV2.S 5 × 1010 viral particles (vp), Ad26.COV2.S 1 × 1011 vp, or placebo, followed by a homologous booster 56 days later. Safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity were assessed. RESULTS: Two hundred participants received Ad26.COV2.S and 50 received placebo. The most frequent solicited local adverse event (AE) was vaccination-site pain, and the most frequent solicited systemic AEs were fatigue, myalgia, and headache. After primary vaccination, neutralizing and binding antibody levels increased through Day 57 (post-prime) in both cohorts. Fourteen days after boosting (Day 71), neutralizing antibody geometric mean titers (GMTs) had almost reached their peak value in Cohort 1 (5 × 1010 vp: GMT = 1049; 1 × 1011 vp: GMT = 1470) and peaked in Cohort 2 (504; 651); at Day 85, GMTs had declined minimally in Cohort 2. For both cohorts, binding antibody levels peaked at Day 71 with minimal decline at Day 85. CONCLUSION: A single dose and homologous Ad26.COV2.S booster increased antibody responses with an acceptable safety profile in Japanese adults (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04509947).

Evaluation of toxicities for intravesical drugs in phase 1 bladder cancer trials.

BACKGROUND: Improving clinical trial design is important for optimizing approval of safe and effective drugs. Phase 1 clinical trials seek to determine phase 2 doses by investigating predefined dose-limiting toxicities. Traditional definitions of dose-limiting toxicity may not be applicable to intravesical therapies for bladder cancer. This study compared the frequency of dose-limiting toxicities and serious adverse events in bladder cancer trials for intravesical therapies to other routes of administration. METHODS: Studies were abstracted from ClinicalTrials.gov and reconciled with a PubMed search. Primary and secondary end points were predefined before data abstraction, and the primary end point was subject-level dose-limiting toxicity rate. Fisher exact tests were performed with p < .05 designated as significant. RESULTS: Eighteen intravesical studies and 24 studies with other routes of administration (the per os/intravenous/intramuscular [PO/IV/IM] group) were identified. Dose-limiting toxicities were reported in 38.9% of intravesical studies, affecting 3.29% of subjects, compared with 30.0% of PO/IV/IM studies representing 4.19% of subjects (p = .52 for study-level and p = .60 for subject-level comparisons). Serious adverse events occurred in 53.9% of intravesical studies in 10.3% of subjects versus 91.0% of studies reporting serious adverse events affecting 41.4% of subjects in the PO/IV/IM group (p = .03 for subject-level and p < .0001 for study-level comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in subject-level dose-limiting toxicity rate between intravesical and PO/IV/IM bladder cancer trials. The serious adverse event rate was lower in the intravesical group. Heterogeneity of dose-limiting toxicity definition may affect interpretation of toxicity in phase 1 bladder cancer clinical trials studying different routes of administration. LAY SUMMARY: Bladder cancer is a common cancer type that may be treated with therapies that are instilled into the bladder and act locally, called intravesical therapies. This study used publicly available regulatory data from early phase clinical trials to determine whether measures of tolerability used in clinical trials are applicable to intravesical therapies for bladder cancer.

Phase I dose-escalation study of milademetan in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Long-term survival in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains low, and current treatment modalities are inadequate. Milademetan (DS-3032, RAIN-32), a small-molecule specific murine double minute 2 inhibitor, has shown a p53 status-dependent antitumor effect in vitro studies. This is the first phase I study report of milademetan monotherapy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML patients evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary tumor response for further clinical development. Fourteen patients received 90 (starting dose, n = 4), 120 (n = 6), or 160 mg (n = 4) of oral milademetan once daily in a 14/28 treatment cycle. The median total treatment duration was 1.5 cycles. Dose-limiting toxicity did not occur, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Thus, the recommended dose was defined as 160 mg. The most common adverse events (AEs) were decreased appetite (64.3%), febrile neutropenia (50%), nausea (42.9%), and anemia (35.7%). No deaths or AEs leading to treatment discontinuation occurred. Five serious treatment-emergent AEs occurred in 4 patients. Plasma concentration increased linearly with milademetan dose. However, trends in the safety and efficacy of oral milademetan in patients with R/R AML warrant further clinical investigation. This study can inform future milademetan studies in hematologic malignancies.

Phase 1 Clinical Trial of Elamipretide in Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Noncentral Geographic Atrophy: ReCLAIM NCGA Study.

Purpose: Assess the safety, tolerability, and feasibility of subcutaneous administration of the mitochondrial-targeted drug elamipretide in patients with dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and noncentral geographic atrophy (NCGA) and to perform exploratory analyses of change in visual function. Design: Phase 1, single-center, open-label, 24-week clinical trial with preplanned NCGA cohort. Participants: Adults ≥ 55 years of age with dry AMD and NCGA. Methods: Participants received subcutaneous elamipretide 40-mg daily; safety and tolerability assessed throughout. Ocular assessments included normal-luminance best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low-luminance BCVA (LLBCVA), normal-luminance binocular reading acuity (NLBRA), low-luminance binocular reading acuity (LLBRA), spectral-domain OCT, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and patient self-reported function by low-luminance questionnaire (LLQ). Main Outcome Measures: Primary end point was safety and tolerability. Prespecified exploratory end-points included changes in BCVA, LLBCVA, NLBRA, LLBRA, geographic atrophy (GA) area, and LLQ. Results: Subcutaneous elamipretide was highly feasible. All participants (n = 19) experienced 1 or more nonocular adverse events (AEs), but all AEs were either mild (73.7%) or moderate (26.3%); no serious AEs were noted. Two participants exited the study because of AEs (conversion to neovascular AMD, n = 1; intolerable injection site reaction, n = 1), 1 participant discontinued because of self-perceived lack of efficacy, and 1 participant chose not to continue with study visits. Among participants completing the study (n = 15), mean ± standard deviation (SD) change in BCVA from baseline to week 24 was +4.6 (5.1) letters (P = 0.0032), while mean change (SD) in LLBCVA was +5.4 ± 7.9 letters (P = 0.0245). Although minimal change in NLBRA occurred, mean ± SD change in LLBCVA was -0.52 ± 0.75 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units (P = 0.005). Mean ± SD change in GA area (square root transformation) from baseline to week 24 was 0.14 ± 0.08 mm by FAF and 0.13 ± 0.14 mm by OCT. Improvement was observed in LLQ for dim light reading and general dim light vision. Conclusions: Elamipretide seems to be well tolerated without serious AEs in patients with dry AMD and NCGA. Exploratory analyses demonstrated possible positive effect on visual function, particularly under low luminance. A Phase 2b trial is underway to evaluate elamipretide further in dry AMD and NCGA.

Phase 1 Clinical Trial of Elamipretide in Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration and High-Risk Drusen: ReCLAIM High-Risk Drusen Study.

Purpose: To assess safety, tolerability, and feasibility of subcutaneous administration of the mitochondrial-targeted drug elamipretide in patients with intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and high-risk drusen (HRD) and to perform exploratory analyses of change in visual function. Design: Phase 1, single-center, open-label, 24-week clinical trial with preplanned HRD cohort. Participants: Adult patients ≥55 years of age with intermediate AMD and HRD. Methods: Participants received subcutaneous elamipretide 40 mg daily, with safety and tolerability assessed throughout the study. Ocular assessments included normal-luminance best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low-luminance best-corrected visual acuity (LLVA), normal-luminance binocular reading acuity (NLRA), low-luminance binocular reading acuity (LLRA), spectral-domain OCT, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), mesopic microperimetry, dark adaptation, and low-luminance questionnaire (LLQ). Main Outcome Measures: The primary end point was safety and tolerability. Prespecified exploratory end points included changes from baseline in BCVA, LLVA, NLRA, LLRA, retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)-drusen complex (DC) volume by OCT, FAF, mesopic microperimetry, dark adaptation, and LLQ results. Results: Subcutaneous administration of elamipretide was highly feasible. All participants with HRD (n = 21) experienced 1 or more adverse events (AEs), but all were mild (57%) or moderate (43%), with the most common events related to injection site reactions. No serious systemic AEs occurred. One participant discontinued because of injection site reaction, 1 participant withdrew because they did not wish to continue study visits, and 1 participant withdrew after experiencing transient visual impairment. Among the 18 participants who completed the study, mean change in BCVA from baseline to 24 weeks was +3.6 letters (P = 0.014) and LLVA was +5.6 letters (P = 0.004). Compared with baseline, mean NLRA improved by -0.11 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units (P = 0.001), and LLRA by -0.28 logMAR units (P < 0.0001). Significant improvements were found in 6 of 7 subscales of the LLQ (P <0.0015). No significant changes were observed for RPE-DC volume, FAF, mesopic microperimetry, or dark adaptation. Conclusions: Elamipretide appeared to be generally safe and well tolerated in treating intermediate AMD and HRD. Exploratory analyses demonstrate a positive effect on visual function, particularly under low-luminance conditions. Further study of elamipretide for treatment of intermediate AMD with HRD is warranted.

A risk stratification model for toxicities in phase 1 immunotherapy trials.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the increased number of novel immunotherapy (IO) agents under current development, their toxicity profile remains to be fully elucidated. METHODS: An IO risk stratification model was developed based on 5 different variables: treatment-related deaths; rate of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events or treatment-emergent adverse events; grade ≥2 encephalopathy or central nervous system toxicity; grade ≥2 cytokine release syndrome; and the number and type of dose-limiting toxicity. Phase 1 IO trials published from January 2014 to December 2020 were reviewed and categorised based on our risk stratification model into three categories: low-, intermediate- and high-risk. Clinical trial variables were associated with the high-risk category. To review the quality of reporting across phase 1 IO trials, a subset of studies was further examined by the use of the ASCO/SITC Trial Reporting in Immuno-Oncology (TRIO) standards. RESULTS: Different IO compounds demonstrated diverse risk profiles. In multivariable analysis, combination versus IO single agent treatment, and testing IO agents different from anti-programmed death-1/programmed death ligand-1 (anti-PD1/L1), anti-cytotoxic t-lymphocyte antigen-4 (anti-CTLA4) antibodies and anti-cancer vaccines were associated with a higher toxicity risk. None of the studies examined in our dataset reported all the items included in the TRIO standards. CONCLUSIONS: Our results have important implications for future clinical trial design. Additionally, standards for reporting are urgently needed.