Successful cetuximab rechallenge in metastatic colorectal cancer: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment has been evolving and increasingly driven by tumor biology and gene expression analysis. Rechallenge with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors (anti-EGFR) represents a promising strategy for patients with RAS wild-type (RAS-wt) mCRC and circulating tumor DNA has emerged as a potential selection strategy. Herein, we report the case of a RAS-wt mCRC patient who had a successful response to cetuximab rechallenge. CASE SUMMARY: Our patient was diagnosed with stage IV RAS-wt, microsatellite-stable rectosigmoid junction adenocarcinoma. He was started on first-line treatment with FOLFIRI and cetuximab and achieved partial response, allowing for a left hepatectomy (R0), followed by post-operative chemotherapy and an anterior resection; progression-free survival (PFS) of 16 months was obtained. Due to hepatic and nodal relapse, second-line treatment with FOLFOX and bevacizumab was started with partial response; metastasectomy was performed (R0), achieving a PFS of 11 months. After a 15 months anti-EGFR-free interval, FOLFIRI and cetuximab were reintroduced upon disease progression, again with partial response and a PFS of 16 months. Following extensive hepatic relapse, cetuximab was reintroduced and a marked clinical and analytical improvement was seen, after only one cycle. RAS-wt status was confirmed on circulating tumor DNA. The patient's overall survival exceeded 5 years. CONCLUSION: Our case provides real-world data to support cetuximab rechallenge in later lines of RAS-wt mCRC treatment.

Efficacy of carboplatin-etoposide rechallenge after first-line chemo-immunotherapy in ES-SCLC: an international multicentric analysis.

Background and objectives: Second-line treatment for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is primarily guided by the time elapsed since the last platinum dose. Rechallenge with carboplatin and etoposide has demonstrated superior outcomes compared to topotecan if the platinum-free interval (PFI) is longer than 90 days and is considered the standard of care. However, these findings predate the chemo-immunotherapy era. This study investigates the effectiveness of the rechallenge strategy after chemo-immunotherapy in a real-world setting. Design and methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with the extensive stage (ES)-SCLC who received rechallenge with carboplatin and etoposide after first-line chemoimmunotherapy between September 2020 and August 2023 in nine European centres. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analysed. Results: A total of 93 patients were included. Sixty-six (71%) patients had a PFI between 3 and 6 months. Consolidation thoracic radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation had been administered in 31 (33.3%) patients and 20 (21.5%) patients, respectively. Overall response rate was 59.1%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.3-5.7) and median overall survival (OS) was 7 months (95% CI 5.7-8.3). Notably, PFS and OS were not different according to PFI (3-6 m vs > 6 m). Conclusion: Rechallenge with carboplatin and etoposide is a valid second-line option in patients with ES-SCLC whose disease progresses after first-line chemoimmunotherapy. Our analysis shows similar results to previous studies. Furthermore, outcomes were consistent across patients with different PFIs, confirming its efficacy in patients with a PFI longer than 3 months.

Successful rechallenge with Erwinia chrysanthemi asparaginase after pegaspargase-induced hypertriglyceridemia: a case report.

Polyethylene-glycolated Escherichia coli-derived l-asparaginase (pegaspargase, pASP) is an essential component of paediatric-inspired regimens for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma; nonetheless, is characterised by severe and potentially life-threatening toxicities, such as hypertriglyceridemia. Grades 3-4 events have been reported in ~1%-18% of paediatric patients and in sparse reports in adults. There is limited evidence on the safety of asparaginase rechallenge in patients experiencing severe pASP-related hypertriglyceridemia. Herein we present the case of a young adult patient diagnosed with T-LBL who experienced an asymptomatic severe pASP-related hypertriglyceridemia and was safely re-exposed to ASP using Erwinia chrysanthemi asparaginase (crisantapase), with only mild transient hypertriglyceridemia recurrence.

Feasibility and tolerability of anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades as rechallenge immunotherapy in previously treated advanced ESCC: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) seemed favorable in several tumors, but clinical experience on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) was scanty. This real-world study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of anlotinib plus ICI for patients with previously ICI-treated advanced ESCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified advanced ESCC patients who received anlotinib plus ICI in the rechallenge setting for evaluation of clinical outcomes and safety. Totally 110 ICI-pretreated patients, of which 89 (80.9%) received prior first- or second-line treatment, were included from September 9, 2019, to November 30, 2022. Most patients (63.6%) discontinued initial ICI due to disease progression. RESULTS: After rechallenge, median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 11.1 (95% CI, 8.6-13.7) and 5.6 (95% CI, 4.4-6.8) months, respectively; estimated OS and PFS rates at 12 months were 47.6% (95% CI, 36.8%-57.7%) and 21.4% (95% CI, 10.9%-34.2%), respectively. No complete response was reported and 21 (19.1%) patients attained partial response; the objective response rate was 19.1%. Fifty-five (50.0%) had stable disease for a disease control rate of 69.1%. Of the 21 responders, median duration of response was 6.4 months. Tendencies for longer OS were observed in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance of 0 (P = .056). The incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was 10.0%. CONCLUSION: Anlotinib plus ICI in the rechallenge setting was promising and resulted in encouraging benefits for patients with previously ICI-treated advanced ESCC. Our findings provided preliminary but unique evidence to help select ESCC patients benefiting from this strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: chictr.org.cn; number ChiCTR2300070777.

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus apatinib in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (CAP 02 Re-challenge): A single-arm, phase II study.

BACKGROUND: With the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), there remains an unmet need for options to address disease progression after prior ICIs. This single-arm phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of re-challenge with camrelizumab plus apatinib in patients with advanced ESCC who were previously treated with ICIs. METHODS: This study enrolled patients aged 18-75 years with unresectable locally advanced, locally recurrent, or distant metastatic ESCC who received prior ICIs. Patients received intravenous camrelizumab 200 mg every 2 weeks and oral apatinib 250 mg daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Between September 1, 2021 and March 29, 2023, 49 eligible patients were enrolled and received treatment. Among the 49 patients, the confirmed ORR was 10.2 % (95 % CI 3.4-22.2), the disease control rate (DCR) was 69.4 % (54.6-81.7), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.6 months (95 % CI 3.8-6.5) and overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months (5.5-13.6). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 17 patients (34.7 %). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the confirmed ORR was modest and did not reach clinically meaningful improvement for patients with ESCC who were previously treated with ICIs, with a manageable safety profile.

Efficacy of a platinum-based chemotherapy rechallenge for platinum-sensitive recurrence after PARP inhibitor maintenance.

Objective: Platinum-free interval (PFI) is the period from the end of platinum-based chemotherapy to the date of recurrence. If the PFI is > 6 months, a platinum-based chemotherapy rechallenge is considered; however, its efficacy after poly adenosine 5'-diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor maintenance therapy is unknown. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of a platinum-based chemotherapy rechallenge after PARP inhibitor therapy. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with ovarian cancer with a PFI≥6 months with PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy, receiving platinum-based chemotherapy. Duration of PARP inhibitor therapy, best response to subsequent platinum chemotherapy rechallenge, and clinical characteristics were collected from medical records. Tumor response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1. Correlations were calculated using Spearman's correlation coefficients. Results: Among the 10 included patients, seven (70 %) received PARP inhibitors after primary chemotherapy, and three (30 %) received chemotherapy for platinum-sensitive relapse. One and five patients harbored a germline BRCA1 and BRCA wild-type mutations, respectively, and two had homologous recombination proficiency. The median PFI was 303.5 (182-602) days, and PARP inhibitor therapy duration was 249 (147-570) days. Platinum chemotherapy rechallenge efficacy was complete and partial response and stable disease in one (10 %), six (60 %), and three (30 %) patients, respectively. The longer the duration of PARP inhibitor treatment, better the response to platinum agents (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.284, p = 0.0288). Conclusion: Platinum-based chemotherapy rechallenge is reasonable for patients with platinum-sensitive disease, using the traditional PFI cutoff of 6 months, even when the PFI is obtained with a maintenance PARP inhibitor.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors rechallenge in non-small cell lung cancer: Current evidence and future directions.

Immunotherapy, remarkably immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has significantly altered the treatment landscape for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite their success, the discontinuation of ICIs therapy may occur due to factors such as prior treatment completion, disease progression during ICIs treatment, or immune-related adverse events (irAEs). As numerous studies highlight the dynamic nature of immune responses and the sustained benefits of ICIs, ICIs rechallenge has become an attractive and feasible option. However, the decision-making process for ICIs rechallenge in clinical settings is complicated by numerous uncertainties. This review systematically analyses existing clinical research evidence, classifying ICIs rechallenge into distinct clinical scenarios, exploring methods to overcome ICIs resistance in rechallenge instances, and identifying biomarkers to select patients likely to benefit from rechallenge. By integrating recent studies and new technologies, we offer crucial recommendations for future clinical trial design and provide a practical guideline to maximize the therapeutic benefits of immunotherapy for NSCLC patients.

ß-glucan combined with Envafolimab and Endostar as immune rechallenge for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge has emerged as a prominent study area in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ß-glucan was reported to reverse resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors by regulating the tumor microenvironment. In this self-initiated clinical trial (ChiCTR2100054796), NSCLC participants who have previously failed anti-PD-1 therapy received ß-glucan (500 mg, bid, d1-21), Envafolimab (300 mg, d1) and Endostar (210 mg, civ72h) every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The clinical efficacy and adverse events were observed, while serum samples were collected for proteomic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty Three patients were enrolled from January 2022 to March 2023 (median age, 65 years; male, n = 18 [78.3%]; squamous NSCLC, n = 9 [39.1%]; mutant type, n = 13 [56.5%]). The overall response rate (ORR) was 21.7% and disease control rate (DCR) was 73.9%. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) was 4.3 months [95% CI: 2.0-6.6] and 9.8 months [95% CI: 7.2-12.4], respectively. The mPFS between PD-L1 positive and negative subgroup has significant difference (6.3 months vs. 2.3 months, p = 0.002). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 52.2% of patients. The most common TRAEs were hypothyroidism (26.1%) and fatigue (26.1%). 2 (8.7%) grade 3 adverse events were reported. No adverse reaction related deaths have been observed. Proteomic analysis revealed that the levels of CASP-8, ARG1, MMP12, CD28 and CXCL5 correlated with resistance to the treatment while the levels of CD40-L and EGF related to the favorable response. CONCLUSION: ß-glucan combined with Envafolimab and Endostar has considerable efficacy and safety for immune rechallenge in metastatic NSCLC patients who failed of anti-PD-1 treatment previously, especially for PD-L1 positive patients.

Statin-associated muscle symptoms: A comprehensive exploration of epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and clinical management strategies.

Statins are the first line of treatment for both primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Despite the positive effects of statins on cardiovascular events, not all patients can use them at an optimized dose. The reason for this is the skeletal muscle side effects, termed statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS). Despite extensive research, the precise pathophysiology of SAMS remains unclear and multiple mechanisms may contribute to this phenomenon. Various therapeutic options are available for the management of SAMS, ranging from rechallenging with the same or a different statin to utilizing non-statin therapeutic alternatives in patients intolerant to statins. However, the lack of consensus on the definition of SAMS, the absence of a definitive diagnostic test, and lack of a universally accepted management algorithm pose a great challenge in dealing with this entity. This review aims to explore the various pathophysiological mechanisms involved in SAMS and understand the difference between self-limited toxic myopathy and immune-mediated myopathy requiring immunomodulatory therapy. The conundrum of statin withdrawal, tapering, and rechallenge in SAMS will also be explored in detail along with the newer non-statin therapies that are available.

Successful replacement for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma with cholecystitis induced by PD-1 antibody: a case report.

The occurrence of immune-related cholecystitis and the subsequent immunotherapy re-challenge has been rarely reported. A patient diagnosed with recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma, developed immune-related cholecystitis after the sixth and eighth cycles of camrelizumab respectively. The patient's symptoms and laboratory test results showed improvement after conservative treatment. Then we chose zimberelimab, a fully humanized PD-1 antibody, as a replacement for camrelizumab in maintenance therapy and successfully completed 37 cycles of zimberelimab (240 mg every 2 weeks per cycle). Surprisingly, the patient experienced no immune-related adverse event and remained in complete remission with a progression-free survival of 28.8 months. The use of Zimberelimab as rechallenge immunotherapy may be an optional choice after managing immune-related cholecystitis induced by other PD-1 antibodies.

Immunotherapy is a new and effective way to treat tumors, but it also brings many side effects. One of the side effects is gallbladder inflammation. Less than 1% of patients developed the gallbladder inflammation. It could lead to many kinds of uncomfortable symptoms and interrupt the tumor treatment. It is still unclear whether immunotherapy can be resumed after the gallbladder inflammation is resolved. We shared a patient who experienced gallbladder inflammation after immunotherapy, then we used another drug successfully to resume the immunotherapy. The patient did not develop any side effects, and the result of tumor treatment was very good. We are hoping this case can provide a reference for other similar patients.

Unsuccessful rechallenge with nivolumab in a patient with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who had a 6-year complete response and treatment-free period: Case report.

Several predictive factors of immune checkpoint inhibitor response have been reported, but there has not been sufficient exploration of which patients benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge. We report the case of a patient with non-small cell lung cancer who had 6 years of complete response with initial nivolumab treatment. After relapse, however, rechallenge with nivolumab did not result in tumour shrinkage or long-term response. Even in patients who had an exceptional response to the initial immune checkpoint inhibitor, long-term efficacy may not be achieved by immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge. Thorough investigation of biomarkers that predict efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge is warranted.

Efficacy and safety of rechallenge with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T radioligand therapy in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and outcome of rechallenge [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T in newly progressed mCRPC patients after response to initial [177Lu]Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy (PRLT). METHODS: We retrospectively included 18 patients who underwent rechallenge with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T. All patients presented with (i) newly progressed disease after response to initial PRLT; (ii) a [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT confirming the presence of PSMA-positive metastases; iii) ECOG performance status 0-1. Adverse events were graded according to CTCAE v5.0. Response was assessed by PSA and classified according to PCWG3 recommendations. For patients who underwent restaging with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, imaging response was categorised according to adapted PERCIST v1.0. In patients with discordant [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and PSA, other available imaging modalities were evaluated to confirm disease status. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the first cycle of initial PRLT and rechallenge PRLT, respectively, until last patient contact or death. RESULTS: Patients were initially treated with a median of 5 cycles (range 4-7) and were rechallenged after a median of 9 months (range 3-13). Each patient received a median of 4 (range 2-7) rechallenge cycles (median cumulative activity 26.1 GBq). None of the patients experienced life-threatening G4 adverse events during either treatment period. Grade 3 adverse events included one case of anaemia, one case of thrombocytopenia, and one case of renal failure. In 8/18 patients long-term toxicities were evaluated. Serious toxicities (≥ Grade 3) occurred in 3/8 patients (n = 1 G4 thrombocytopenia, n = 1 G4 renal failure and n = 1 pancytopenia and G4 renal failure). Best PSA50%-response was observed in 44% of patients and PSA-disease control was confirmed in 56% of patients at the last cycle. Of the 12/18 patients restaged by imaging, 6/12 (50%) patients had disease control (partial response/stable disease), 1/12 had a mixed response, and 5/12 had progression. After a median follow-up time of 25 months (range 14-44), 10 patients had died, 7 were still alive, and one patient was lost at follow-up. The median OS was 29 months (95%CI, 14.3-43.7 months) for the initial treatment and 11 months (95%CI, 8.1-13.8 months) for the first rechallenge course. CONCLUSION: More than half of patients benefit from rechallenge PRLT. Our analysis suggests that rechallenge may prolong survival in selected patients, with an acceptable safety profile.

Real-World Outcomes of Subsequent Chemotherapy after Progression Following Chemoradiation and Consolidative Durvalumab Therapy in Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: An Exploratory Analysis from the CRIMSON Study (HOPE-005).

BACKGROUND: The optimal subsequent treatment strategy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and consolidative durvalumab therapy remains unknown. We aimed to determine the optimal subsequent treatment strategy for this clinical population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 523 consecutive patients with LA-NSCLC treated with CRT and analyzed the treatment outcomes of subsequent therapy after progression following CRT and consolidative durvalumab therapy. Patients who received tyrosine kinase inhibitors as subsequent therapy were excluded. RESULTS: Out of 122 patients who received subsequent chemotherapy, 55% underwent platinum-based, 25% non-platinum-based, and 20% immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-containing therapies. In the platinum-based group, patients with a durvalumab-progression-free survival (Dur-PFS) ≥ 1 year had a significantly longer median subsequent therapy-PFS (SubTx-PFS) than those with Dur-PFS < 1 year (13.2 months vs. 4.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.97; P = .04). Furthermore, among patients receiving non-platinum-based chemotherapy, the median SubTx-PFS was longer in the combined with angiogenesis inhibitor group than in the without group, although the difference was not statistically significant. No significant difference of SubTx-PFS was observed between the reason for durvalumab discontinuation and the outcomes of ICI-containing therapy. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice, platinum-based chemotherapy rechallenge is frequently employed following progression subsequent to CRT and consolidative durvalumab therapy for LA-NSCLC. Optimal treatment strategies may consider Dur-PFS and angiogenesis inhibitor feasibility. Further research is warranted to identify clinical biomarkers that can help identify patients who would benefit from ICI rechallenge.

Denosumab Re-Challenge and Long-Term Efficacy for Aneurysmal Bone Cyst of the Spine: Enhanced Treatment Algorithm.

Background/Objective: Surgical treatment of aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) can be challenging, especially in the spine. Non-surgical treatments such as with denosumab have shown promising results in different osteolytic pathologies. This retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiologic response of patients with ABCs of the mobile spine treated with denosumab and propose an updated treatment algorithm. Methods: Six patients with relapsed and symptomatic ABCs of the mobile spine were treated with denosumab (120 mg subcutaneously on days 1, 8, 15, 29, and every 4 weeks thereafter) between 2012 and 2023. Disease assessments were conducted using CT and MRI at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-treatment. Clinical data, including pain levels, symptoms, and adverse events, were documented from patients' charts. Results: Patients underwent an initial phase of treatment with denosumab, receiving a mean of 22 administrations (range 13-42) over a median follow-up period of 41 months (range 15-98 months). Clinical improvement was observed in all patients after 4 weeks of treatment, and all patients demonstrated a radiological response after 12-24 weeks on denosumab. Three patients were progression-free after discontinuing denosumab following 13, 15, and 42 administrations, respectively. At the last follow-up, after 38, 43, and 98 months, these patients remained stable without relapse of the disease. Three patients had a relapse of disease after denosumab; two of them underwent denosumab re-challenge, while one patient received one mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) injection. All patients showed clinical and radiological improvement and were resulted to be disease-free at the last follow-up. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the long-term efficacy and safety of denosumab in treating ABCs of the mobile spine, as well as the potential of re-challenge in managing recurrence. A treatment algorithm is proposed, positioning denosumab as a viable therapeutic option after other local treatments. Careful patient selection, monitoring, and further research are necessary to optimize denosumab use for ABCs.

Successful rechallenge with azacytidine and venetoclax after sustained treatment-free remission in a relapsed acute myeloid leukemia patient: a case report.

Combined therapy with venetoclax and hypomethylating agents has significantly improved the outcome of unfit patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. A recently published exploratory analysis of the VIALE-A trial reported that up to 51% of patients achieving remission survived more than 2 years. These data along with those from reallife settings, lead to questioning how long it is appropriate to continue treatment in long-term survivors. Accordingly, recent retrospective studies suggested the feasibility of suspending therapy in selected patients while maintaining prolonged responses. Also, these studies showed that retreatment may induce a second remission in almost a third of patients. We report the case of a patient who received salvage therapy with venetoclax and azacytidine, that was discontinued few cycles after blasts clearance because of severe hematological toxicity. Despite suspension, he maintained a sustained response lasting almost one year and was successfully retreated with the same combination when a second relapse occurred.

Safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge after severe immune-related adverse events: a retrospective analysis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) present clinicians with the challenge of managing immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can range from mild to severe due to immune system activation 1. While guidelines recommend discontinuing ICIs for grade 3 partial and all grade 4 irAEs, there is growing interest in rechallenging patients based on oncological outcomes, particularly for cardiovascular and neurological irAEs where data remains scarce 1,2. We retrospectively evaluated the safety of ICI rechallenge following grade 3-4 irAEs, specifically focusing on cardiovascular and neurological events, in patients discussed at our multidisciplinary immunotoxicity assessment board between 2019 and 2021. Fifteen patients were included, with a median time to severe irAE onset of 49 days. Among them, five patients experienced neurological adverse events (NAEs): aseptic meningitis (3), inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy (1), and ophthalmoplegia (1), while one patient presented with myocarditis. Of the 15 patients retreated with ICIs after initial severe irAEs, 11 (73%) remained free of subsequent irAEs, two (13%) experienced recurrence of the initial irAE, and two (13%) developed new irAEs distinct from the initial event. The median time to event recurrence was 69 days, occurring no earlier than the initial severe irAE. In the subset analysis focusing on severe cardiovascular and neurological irAEs, rechallenge with ICIs was generally well tolerated. However, one patient treated with anti-PD1 experienced a relapse of grade 2 aseptic meningitis. Overall, our findings suggest that rechallenging with ICIs after severe irAEs, including those affecting the cardiovascular and neurological systems, may be safe, particularly after irAE regression and corticosteroid withdrawal.

Rechallenge immunotherapy after immune resistance in patients with advanced thymic carcinoma.

BACKGROUNDS: Immunotherapy is effective for patients with advanced thymic carcinoma (TC). However, the effectiveness of rechallenge immunotherapy in patients who are resistant to immunotherapy has not been investigated. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with advanced TC using immunotherapy between 2016 and 2023 at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, and Fujian Cancer Hospital were evaluated in this study. Tumor response was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients were included in this study. The median PFS (mPFS) for all patients was 5.43 months and the median OS (mOS) was 16 months. After rechallenge immunotherapy, only three patients achieved partial response, resulting in an overall response rate of 16.7%, and nine patients attained stable disease, resulting in a disease control rate of 66.7%. Patients who underwent rechallenge immunotherapy had shorter mPFS compared to chemotherapy (3.53 months vs. 6.00 months, P = 0.041). In addition, the incidence of Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events in these patients was 22.2%. CONCLUSION: Rechallenge immunotherapy has poor efficacy in immunotolerant TC patients.

Efficacy of anti-epidermal growth factor antibody rechallenge in RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional observational study.

PURPOSE: To investigate circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) RAS mutant (MT) incidence before salvage-line treatment and the clinicopathological features and molecular biological factors associated with the efficacy of anti-epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody (mAb) rechallenge for tissue RAS/BRAF wild type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: This multi-institutional retrospective observational study included 74 patients with mCRC with tissue RAS/BRAF WT refractory to first-line chemotherapy containing anti-EGFR mAb. ctDNA RAS status was assessed using the OncoBEAM™ RAS CRC Kit. We explored the clinicopathological features associated with ctDNA RAS status and the factors related to anti-EGFR mAb rechallenge efficacy in multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: The incidence of RAS MT in ctDNA was 40.5% (30/74), which was associated with primary tumor resection (P = 0.016), liver metastasis (P < 0.001), and high tumor marker levels (P < 0.001). Among the 39 patients treated with anti-EGFR mAb rechallenge, those with ctDNA RAS WT showed significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than those with ctDNA RAS MT (median 4.1 vs. 2.7 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39, P = 0.045). Patients who responded to first-line anti-EGFR mAb showed significantly longer PFS (HR = 0.21, P = 0.0026) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.23, P = 0.026) than those with stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of ctDNA RAS MT mCRC was 40.5%, which was associated with liver metastases and high tumor volumes. Anti-EGFR mAb rechallenge may be effective for patients with mCRC who responded to first-line chemotherapy containing anti-EGFR mAb. No patients with RAS MT in ctDNA responded to anti-EGFR mAb rechallenge.

EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Retreatment in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Previously Exposed to EGFR-TKI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) retreatment in advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane databases, ASCO, and ESMO websites for studies evaluating EGFR-TKI retreatment in advanced/metastatic NSCLC patients. All analyses were performed using R software (v.4.2.2). We included 19 studies (9 CTs and 10 retrospective cohorts) with a total of 886 patients. In a pooled analysis of all patients during retreatment with TKI, median OS was 11.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.2-13.4 months) and PFS was 3.2 months (95% CI 2.5-3.9 months). ORR was 15% (95% CI 10-21%) and DCR was 61% (95% CI 53-67%). The subanalysis by generation of TKI in the rechallenge period revealed a slightly better ORR for patients on 3rd generation TKI (p = 0.05). Some limitations include the high heterogeneity of some of the analyses and inability to perform certain subanalyses. Our results unequivocally support the benefit of EGFR-TKI rechallenge in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients progressing on TKI treatment after a TKI-free interval. These findings may be especially valuable in areas where access to novel therapeutic drugs and clinical trials is limited.

Efficacy and safety of rechallenge [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT after initial partial remission in patients with mCRPC: evaluation of a prospective registry (REALITY study).

AIM: Rechallenge of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy (RLT) was proposed for patients who initially responded to PSMA-RLT experiencing partial remission, but relapsed into progression after a certain period of remission. However, only limited data is available regarding this approach. In this study, we analyzed the efficacy and safety profile of one or more series of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT rechallenge in patients from a prospective registry (REALITY Study, NCT04833517) after they initially benefited from PSMA-RLT. METHODS: Forty-seven patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who had biochemical response to initial [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT followed by disease progression received at least one (up to three) series of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT rechallenge. Biochemical response rates based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum value, PSA-based progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Adverse events of the treatment were assessed according to 'common terminology criteria for adverse events' (CTCAE). RESULTS: After one series of RLT rechallenge, a PSA decline of at least 50% was achieved in 27/47 patients (57.4%). The median PFS of all patients was 8.7 mo and the median OS was 22.7 mo, each calculated from the administration of the first rechallenge series. Patients who responded (PSA decline > 50%) to the rechallenge showed a median OS of 27.3 mo. Regarding PFS, a significant correlation (r = 0.4128, p = 0.0323) was found for these patients comparing initial and rechallenge RLT. Ten patients received a second and 3 patients received a third rechallenge series with 8/10 and 3/3 patients responding to repeated RLT rechallenge. No severe deterioration of adverse events rated by CTCAE criteria was observed. CONCLUSION: [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT rechallenge is associated with significant PSA response and encouraging survival outcome as well as a very favourable safety profile and should therefore be considered as a straight-forward treatment option in mCRPC patients, who previously benefited from PSMA-RLT.