Experimental Investigation of the Dynamic Responses of Thin-Walled and Foam-Filled Steel Tubes Subjected to Repeated Impacts.

In this study, a horizontal impact setup was used to measure the dynamic responses of specimens fixed on a reaction wall and subjected to repeated impacts generated by a large-tonnage impactor. The contact force, deformation process, energy absorption, and other properties of two specimens (a thin-walled steel tube and foam-filled steel tube) were thoroughly investigated. The results demonstrated that the thin-walled tube's properties were consistent with the four-phase and six-phase deformation models and that the foam-filled tube's properties were consistent with the two-phase deformation model. In the early stages of the experiment, the foam-filled and thin-walled tubes were similar in terms of the contact force and energy absorption. However, when the polyurethane (PU) strain reached 0.8, the PU significantly increased the support of the tubes, reduced the contact force (by extending the contact time), and increased the energy absorption capacity by 33.6-43.5%. The crush curves of the specimens were in agreement for cases involving multiple impacts, as well as for one impact with the same impact of kinetic energy. The crush curves can be used to assess the actual performance of crashworthy devices. Furthermore, after repeated impacts, the foam-filled tube exhibited a pseudo-shakedown behavior.

Dynamic Response and Damage Accumulation of Laminated Composites under Repeated Low-Velocity Impacts.

The mechanical response and damage accumulation of carbon-fiber-reinforced composite laminates subjected to repeated low-velocity impacts were experimentally investigated. The repeated impact tests were conducted on [902/-452/02/452]S quasi-isotropic and [902/02]2S cross-ply composite laminates under 16.8 J impact energy, respectively. For each impact, impact responses such as force-time, force-displacement and energy-time curves were recorded. The trends of peak force, maximum central displacement, energy absorption rate and bending stiffness with the increasing impact number were summarized, and the maximum number of repeated impacts corresponded to the occurrence of penetration events. The results showed that the delamination initiation, fiber breakage and penetration were the three typical characteristics describing the damage evolution of the repeated impacts. The damage accumulation of both the laminates was characterized by employing appropriate damage indices. By contrast, the quasi-isotropic laminates had higher impact resistance and damage tolerance, and their damage accumulation was relatively slower.

Application of polyethylene air-bubble cushions to improve the shock absorption performance of Type I construction helmets for repeated impacts.

BACKGROUND: The use of helmets was considered to be one of the important prevention strategies employed on construction sites. The shock absorption performance of a construction (or industrial) helmet is its most important performance parameter. Industrial helmets will experience cumulative structural damage when being impacted repeatedly with impact magnitudes greater than its endurance limit. OBJECTIVE: The current study is to test if the shock absorption performance of Type I construction helmets subjected to repeated impacts can be improved by applying polyethylene air-bubble cushions to the helmet suspension system. METHODS: Drop impact tests were performed using a commercial drop tower test machine following the ANSI Z89.1 Type I drop impact protocol. Typical off-the-shelf Type I construction helmets were evaluated in the study. A 5 mm thick air-bubble cushioning liner was placed between the headform and the helmet to be tested. Helmets were impacted ten times at different drop heights from 0.61 to 1.73 m. The effects of the air-bubble cushioning liner on the helmets' shock absorption performance were evaluated by comparing the peak transmitted forces collected from the original off-the-shelf helmet samples to the helmets equipped with air-bubble cushioning liners. RESULTS: Our results showed that a typical Type I construction helmet can be subjected to repeated impacts with a magnitude less than 22 J (corresponding to a drop height 0.61 m) without compromising its shock absorption performance. In comparison, the same construction helmet, when equipped with an air-bubble cushioning liner, can be subjected to repeated impacts of a magnitude of 54 J (corresponding to a drop height 1.52 m) without compromising its shock absorption performance. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the helmet's shock absorbing endurance limit has been increased by 145% with addition of an air-bubble cushioning liner.

Evaluation of the shock absorption performance of construction helmets under repeated top impacts.

It is accepted in industries that an industrial helmet should be disposed of when it is subjected to a significant impact. There is no scientific evidence that supports this well-accepted belief. The current study was intended to evaluate the shock absorption performance of industrial helmets under repeated impacts. Common industrial or construction helmets are categorized as Type I according to ANSI Z89.1 and they are designed to mainly protect top impacts. A representative basic Type I construction helmet model was selected in the study. Helmets were repeatedly impacted ten times using a commercial drop tower tester with an impactor (mass 3.6 kg) at different drop heights from 0.30 to 2.03 m. A total of 80 impact trials were performed in the study. The relationships of the transmitted force with the drop height and with impact number were analyzed. A new parameter - the endurance limit - was proposed to evaluate the shock absorption performance of a helmet. The helmets were observed to experience cumulative structural damage with increasing impact number, resulting in a degrading shock absorption performance, when being impacted repeatedly with magnitudes greater than the endurance limit. Repeated impacts with magnitudes smaller than the endurance limit did not cause measurable cumulative structural damage to the helmets in our study.

Quantifying the Effect of Repeated Impacts and Lateral Tip Movements on Brain Responses during Controlled Cortical Impact.

Controlled cortical impact (CCI) is a widely used laboratory neurotrauma model to study traumatic brain injury. During CCI, the brain is damaged by an impactor tip, which travels along its axial direction to a pre-defined depth at a pre-set speed. A recent study, however, using high-speed imaging analysis demonstrated that the impactor tip of an electromagnetically driven CCI device experienced repeated impacts and lateral movements, rather than a single axial impact. How these repeated impacts and lateral movements affect internal brain stresses/strains-which are the direct cause of neuronal damage and affect the accuracy and reproducibility of CCI-remains unknown. We use a previously validated, highly detailed three-dimensional finite element (FE) mouse brain model to investigate the effect of repeated impacts and lateral movements on brain responses during CCI. We also measured tip movements of an in-house pneumatically driven CCI and conducted FE simulations. We found that the repeated impacts had minimal effect on peak strains. The lateral movements of the tip, however, greatly increased brain strains and affected large brain regions. Hence, it is necessary to monitor and control lateral movements to ensure the accuracy and reproducibility of CCI.