A randomized controlled double-blinded split-face prospective clinical trial to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a novel 3-step routine compared to benzoyl peroxide for the treatment of mild to moderate acne vulgaris.

Adult acne vulgaris affects up to 43-51% of individuals. While there are numerous treatment options for acne including topical, oral, and energy-based approaches, benzoyl peroxide (BPO) is a popular over the counter (OTC) treatment. Although BPO monotherapy has a long history of efficacy and safety, it suffers from several disadvantages, most notably, skin irritation, particularly for treatment naïve patients. In this prospective, randomized, controlled, split-face study, we evaluated the comparative efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a novel 3-step azelaic acid, salicylic acid, and graduated retinol regimen versus a common OTC BPO-based regimen over 12 weeks. A total of 37 adult subjects with self-reported mild to moderate acne vulgaris were recruited. A total of 21 subjects underwent a 2-week washout period and completed the full study with 3 dropping out due to product irritation from the BPO routine, and 13 being lost to follow-up. Detailed tolerability surveys were conducted at Week 4. Additional surveys on tolerability and product preferences were collected monthly, at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12. A blinded board-certified dermatologist objectively scored the presence and type of acne lesions (open or closed comedones, papules, pustules, nodules, and cysts) at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12. Patients photographed themselves and uploaded the images using personal mobile phones. Detailed Week 4 survey results showed across 25 domains of user-assessed product performance, the novel routine outperformed the BPO routine in 19 (76%) which included domains in preference (e.g. "I would use this in the future) and performance ("my skin improved" and "helped my acne clear up faster"). Users of the novel routine reported less facial redness, itching, and burning, though differences did not reach statistical significance. In terms of efficacy, both products performed similarly, reducing total acne lesions by 36% (novel routine) and 40% (BPO routine) by Week 12. Overall, accounting for user preferences and tolerability the novel routine was more preferred than the BPO routine in 79% of domains (22/28). Differences in objective acne lesion reduction were not statistically significant (p = 0.97). In a randomized split-face study, a 3-step azelaic acid, salicylic acid, and graduated retinol regimen delivered similar acne lesion reduction, fewer user dropouts, greater user tolerability, and higher use preference compared to a 3-step BPO routine based in a cohort of participants with mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris.

Allergic contact dermatitis to salicylic acid: A case series of relevant sensitization.

INTRODUCTION: Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) to salicylic acid (SA) is widely unreported. Furthermore, cross-reactivity between SA and other salicylates has not been reported despite well-documented in-group salicylate cross-reactivity. OBJECTIVE: To describe our clinic's experience patch testing to SA, highlighting seven cases of relevant reactions and concomitant reactivity with other salicylates. METHODS: Results of patch testing to 5% SA in petrolatum between 1 January 2020, and 9 February 2024, are reported. Seven cases of relevant reactions to SA are detailed. RESULTS: A total of 489 patients (27.5%) were tested to SA, 21 of which were positive: 7 doubtful (+/-), 14 weak positive (+), and no strong/extreme positive reactions. Four irritant reactions were documented. Of the 14 weak positive (+) reactions, 7 had definite or probable clinical relevance, 5 of which also reacted to other salicylates. CONCLUSIONS: ACD to SA is likely underreported due to a lack of testing. In our experience, testing SA 5% petrolatum is tolerable without significant irritation. Cross-reactivity between SA and other salicylates is probable. Though SA appears to be the primary sensitizer in some cases, more studies are needed to understand its possible role as a marker for salicylate allergy.

2% supramolecular salicylic acid hydrogel vs. adapaline gel in mild to moderate acne vulgaris treatment: A multicenter, randomized, evaluator-blind, parallel-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Salicylic acid (SA) has been used for treatment of acne of different severity levels. However, there are few researches about the safety and efficacy for treatment of mild to moderate acne, and the improvement of the skin condition by using 2% supramolecular salicylic acid (SSA) compared to Davuwen Adapaline gel. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, assessor-blind and parallel-controlled study was conducted. A total of 500 patients (trial group: 249, control group: 251) with mild to moderate (grade I-II) facial acne vulgaris were recruited in this study over a 16-week trial period. Patients in the trial group were treated with Broda 2% SSA hydrogel, while control group treated with Davuwen Adapaline gel once a day. The number of inflammatory papules, comedones, and pustules were counted and the rate of lesion reduction was calculated pre- and post-treatment. Then, the skin physiological indicators, including L*a*b*, TEWL, skin sebum and hydration were measured. Statistical analysis was conducted using SAS 9.4. Significance was set at p = 0.05. RESULTS: At the end of 12 weeks' therapy, the regression and markedly improvement rate of the trail group and the control group were 51.01% and 43.10% respectively, and there was no significant difference in the improvement rate between two groups (p = 0.0831). Although, there was no difference in adverse events rate between two groups, the adverse events rate of the trail group was 0.40%, a little lower than the control group (0.80%). Moreover, there was a significant difference in the numbers of pores at T1 between two groups. CONCLUSION: Both 2% SSA and Adapaline gel were equally effective in the treatment of mild to moderate acne vulgaris. 2% SSA is worth the clinical promotion and application in mild to moderate acne vulgaris.

Application of cantharidin, retinoic acid cream and salicylic acidy in multiple palmoplantar warts.

OBJECTIVE: Multiple palmoplantar warts, caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, were investigated for clinical efficacy using cantharidin, retinoic acid cream, and salicylic acid cream. METHODS: A total of 110 patients with multiple palmoplantar warts were enrolled. The experimental group (54 cases) received a 1:1:1 combination (CRS) of 0.25% cantharidin, 0.1% retinoic acid cream, and 5% salicylic acid, applied with pressurized encapsulation for 8 h every night, three times per week. The control group (56 cases) underwent conventional liquid nitrogen freezing. Monthly follow-ups assessed cure rate, effective rate, dermatological life quality index (DLQI), visual analog scale (VAS), and cost, with evaluations conducted after 3 months. RESULTS: The treatment group exhibited a cure rate of 85.19% and a total effective rate of 96.30%, surpassing the control group with rates of 39.29% and 51.79%, respectively (p < 0.05). The treatment group's DLQI score (1.84 ± 1.06) was significantly lower than the control group's score (6.04 ± 1.78) (p = 0.0005). Additionally, the treatment group's VAS score (1.84 ± 1.06) was notably lower than the control group's score (8.56 ± 1.07) (p < 0.0001). The treatment group's total cost (43.20 ± 2.85) was markedly lower than the control group's cost (206.38 ± 90.81), with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The combination of cantharidin, retinoic acid cream, and salicylic acid with local encapsulation is a safe, effective, economical, and convenient treatment method for multiple palmoplantar warts, exhibiting few side effects and showing promise.

Topical Silymarin Cream as a Novel Therapy Versus Salicylic Acid Peels in Acne Vulgaris: A Split-Face Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris is a common dermatological condition that greatly impacts patients' self-confidence. Ongoing research is conducted to explore new treatment modalities. Silymarin owns special characteristics that qualify it as a possible treatment for acne vulgaris. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of silymarin cream as a new therapeutic option against salicylic acid peels in the treatment of mild to moderate acne vulgaris. METHODS: A split-face, comparative, Quasi-experimental clinical trial included 30 patients with acne vulgaris. Salicylic acid 30% peels were applied as an office procedure to one half of the face every 2 weeks for 3 months. Topical silymarin 1.4% cream was prescribed as a home treatment, twice daily, to the other half of the face for 3 months. The results were evaluated using the Global Acne Grading System (GAGS), photographic evaluation, and patient self-assessment scale. The adverse effects during treatment were recorded. The sample size was calculated by Stata/IC 16.1. RESULTS: After treatment, a significant reduction of GAGS was noted on both sides of the face, with an insignificant difference between both treatments. The comparative photographic evaluation and patient self-assessment scale were also insignificant. Hyperpigmentation was recorded in 2 cases on the salicylic acid-treated side. No side effects for silymarin cream were observed. CONCLUSION: Topical silymarin cream 1.4% showed comparable results to Salicylic acid 30% peels. It can be considered a promising safe treatment modality for mild to moderate acne vulgaris.

The effects of supramolecular nicotinamide combined with supramolecular salicylic acid on chloasma.

OBJECTIVE: To observe the efficacy and safety of supramolecular salicylic acid monotherapy and supramolecular nicotinamide in the treatment of chloasma. METHODS: A total of 28 female patients with chloasma diagnosed in the dermatology outpatient department of our hospital were randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group, with 14 cases in each group. All patients were treated with 30% supramolecular salicylic acid every 2 weeks, for a total of 8 treatments. The experimental group was treated with 10% supramolecular nicotinamide once in the morning and once in the evening, and the control group was a blank control. Before each exfoliation treatment, subjects were photographed with a VISIA skin detector, and skin image analysis and modified melasma area and severity index (MASI) score were performed. RESULTS: According to the MMASI decrease rate (%) before and after treatment, the effective rate of the experimental group was 64.29%, and the effective rate of the control group was 14.29%. The results of the GriffithS10 and VISIA were improved. During the whole treatment, there was one mild adverse reaction in both groups. CONCLUSION: Salicylic acid stripping combined with nicotinamide in the treatment of chloasma is safe and effective, can improve skin conditions, and can be widely applied in clinical practice.

Efficacy of topical 30% salicylic acid in combination with minocycline in moderate to severe acne.

To evaluate the efficacy of topical 30% salicylic acid plus minocycline in moderate to severe acne. One hundred patients with moderate to severe acne from February 2020 to February 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. They were assigned (1:1) to receive either topical 30% salicylic acid plus minocycline (combination group) or minocycline (mono therapy group). The acne scores, physician subjective and objective scores, efficacy, quality of life, incidence of adverse reactions, recurrence and satisfaction in both groups were compared. The combination group had lower Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) scores, erythema scores and papulopustular scores than the mono therapy group. Combined therapy was associated with lower erythema absolute value and erythema index, more skin water content and less transcutaneous water loss versus minocycline. Higher efficacy, acne symptoms scores, and quality of life were observed with combination therapy versus mono therapy (P<0.05). The two groups had a similar incidence of adverse reactions and recurrence. Combination therapy showed a higher appearance satisfaction versus mono therapy. The efficacy of topical 30% salicylic acid plus minocycline for moderate to severe acne was better versus minocycline.

Efficacy of supramolecular salicylic acid in combination with doxycycline in the treatment of acne.

To determine the efficacy of supramolecular salicylic acid combined with doxycycline on acne, totally 70 patients with acne treated in our dermatology department from May 2020 to May 2021 were enrolled and randomized (1:1) into control or experimental groups using the random number table method. The control group was given doxycycline for oral administration while the experimental group was given oral doxycycline combined with supramolecular salicylic acid for topical administration. The overall effective rate of treatment was significantly higher in the experimental group versus control group (97.14% vs. 82.86%, P<0.05). Patients in the control group had significantly longer mean acne regression time after treatment versus experimental group (P<0.05). After treatment, patients in the experimental group had significantly lower self-rating depression scale (SDS) scores and self-perceived burden (SPB) scores than the control group, while Short Form 36-item health survey (SF-36) scores were significantly higher than the control group (P<0.05). The overall incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower in the experimental group versus control group (5.71% vs. 17.14%, P<0.05). Supramolecular salicylic acid in combination with doxycycline in the treatment of patients with acne is an optimal option, as it could better promote acne regression, reduce the level of depression and reduce the patient's self-perceived burden.

Maintenance effect of a once-weekly regimen of a Selenium Disulfide-based shampoo in moderate-to-severe scalp seborrheic dermatitis after initial treatment with topical corticosteroid/salicylic acid.

INTRODUCTION: Seborrheic dermatitis (SD) is a chronic, relapsing, inflammatory disorder of the head and trunk. OBJECTIVES: To explore the potential of a 1% Selenium disulphide (SeS2)-based shampoo to prevent relapses of scalp SD (SSD) following corticosteroid/salicylic acid (TCS/SA) treatment. MATERIALS & METHODS: After a 2-week treatment with TCS/SA, adult patients with moderate-to-severe SSD received either the SeS2-based shampoo or its vehicle for eight weeks in a randomized, double-blinded fashion. Visits took place at baseline, weeks 2, 6 and 10. SSD severity was assessed based on erythema, flakes and pruritus; patients assessed the severity of pruritus. Global investigator and patient satisfaction were assessed at week 10. RESULTS: Forty-eight adults were included. After four and eight weeks of post TCS/SA maintenance regimen, 8.1% and 16.7% in the SeS2, and 41.7% and 54.2% in the vehicle group relapsed, respectively. First median time-to-relapse in the vehicle group was 56 days; this was not reached for SeS2. After two weeks of TCS/SA, the prevalence of patients with no pruritus was 29.2% in the SeS2 group, and 41.7% in the vehicle group; it increased to 76.2% with SeS2 and to 57.1% with the vehicle at the end of the study. The clinical benefit of treatment with TCS/SCA was maintained in the SeS2 group only. Investigators and patients were highly satisfied with the efficacy of SeS2. Tolerance to SeS2 was excellent, with no reported adverse events. CONCLUSION: The SeS2-based shampoo significantly reduces the time-to-relapse of moderate-to-severe SSD flares. Its tolerance was excellent, with no reported adverse events.

Efficacy and safety of a facial serum and a mask containing salicylic acid and lipohydroxy acid in acne management: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory and non-inflammatory acne lesions constitute a significant clinical challenge in acne subjects. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a facial serum and a mask containing salicylic acid and lipohydroxy acid for improving skin conditions. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial included adults with comedones, post-inflammatory erythema (PIE) and/or hyperpigmentation (PIH) in Shanghai, China in July 2021. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive the study Serum + Mask or serum alone for 8 weeks. Acne severity, comedones, papules, pustules, PIE, PIH, skin pores, skin tone evenness, sebum secretion, skin hydration, and trans-epidermal water loss were evaluated at T0d, T1d, T7d, T14d, T28d, and T56d. RESULTS: Eighty-three participants were included, including 41 and 42 in the Serum + Mask and Serum groups, respectively. Acne severity, density of skin pores, skin tone evenness, PIH foci on face, PIE foci on nose, intensity of PIE and PIH, closed comedones on face, open comedones on nose, sebum secretion, and skin hydration were significantly improved from baseline after 8 weeks of treatment in both groups (all p < 0.05). Addition of the mask improved the number of closed comedones (-6.56 ± 0.39 vs. -5.19 ± 0.44, p = 0.022) and acne severity (-0.39 ± 0.08 vs. -0.12 ± 0.09, p = 0.026) substantially more than using the serum alone. No adverse reaction was reported in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The study serum improved skin conditions by regulating skin barrier function and achieving a balance of skin hydration and sebum secretion, removing comedones and improving PIE and PIH. Addition of the mask accelerated the effects without compromising safety.

Combination treatment with 30% salicylic acid and fractional CO2 laser for acne scars: A 20-week prospective, randomized, split-face study.

Multiple approaches are used to treat acne scars, but some are expensive, ineffective, and cause complications. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultra-pulsed CO2 fractional laser combined with 30% supramolecular salicylic acid in the treatment of acne scars in a prospective split-face control study. Twenty patients with facial symmetrical acne scars were enrolled. One side of face was randomly treated with 30% supramolecular salicylic acid, and two sides were treated with ultra-pulsed CO2 fractional laser. The Echelle d'evaluation clinique des cicatrices d'acne (ECCA) scale was used to evaluate the clinical efficacy before and 3 months after treatment, and a quartile scale was used to self-evaluate the improvement of patients. A visual analog scale was used to record pain scores after each treatment, and side effects and other adverse reactions on the face were recorded. All the patients completed treatment and follow-up. There was statistical difference in ECCA scores of bilateral facial acne scars after three treatments (p < 0.001). ECCA scores on the combined side were lower after three treatments than those on the laser side (p = 0.003). The patient satisfaction quartile scale on the combined side was higher than that on the laser side alone (p = 0.015). Ultra-pulsed CO2 fractional laser combined with 30% supramolecular salicylic acid has better efficacy in the treatment of acne scars than laser alone, and patient self-assessment of combined treatment has a greater degree of improvement in acne scars, and does not increase patient pain scores and related adverse reactions.

Randomized prospective study of low-dose isotretinoin alone and combination with salicylic acid and mandelic peel against acne tarda.

BACKGROUND: Acne tarda (AT) is typically known as adult acne and most preferably affected 25-45 age groups. Used isotretinoid monotherapy is not effective and also produces side effects from long treatment. AIM: The present study assesses the effectiveness of combined treatment of oral isotretinoid with topical chemical peeling (20% salicylic and 10% mandelic acid known as SM peeling) by a comparative double-blind randomized single-center interventional open-label study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total fifty-eight participants AT outpatients (25-45 age groups) attending for diagnosis in two groups and effectiveness of proposed combined treatments were determined at baseline and follow-up within 4-week interval. Briefly group A (n = 28) received 0.5 mg/kg of oral isotretinoin once daily for 16 weeks and group B (n = 30) received the same oral dose, addition with SM peeling every 4 weeks interval for 16 weeks. After 4 weeks, treatment efficacy was assessed based on Michelson's acne severity index (MASI) and visual analog scale (VAS), further validated using statistical tools. RESULTS: Based on MASI and VAS scores, combined treatment was significantly effective than the monotherapy. The pre- and post-treatment analyses of response to scarring, inflammatory components at baseline and at the end of treatment were also statistically significant with p > 0.008. CONCLUSION: The above investigation revealed that the combination of oral isotretinoin with SM peeling was highly effective and could be used as newer therapy against AT without any serious side effects.

A prospective, randomized, split-face study of concomitant administration of low-dose oral isotretinoin with 30% salicylic acid chemical peeling for the treatment of acne vulgaris in Asian population.

BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris (AV) is a common dermatosis. For moderate to severe AV, isotretinoin is the first-line treatment. Chemical peeling with supramolecular salicylic acid (SSA) was developed with water solubility and advanced skin penetration properties. In the present study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of oral low-dose isotretinoin combined with 30% SSA chemical peeling. METHODS: Thirty-three moderate-to-severe acne patients were enrolled and received oral low-dose (0.2-0.4 mg/kg/d) isotretinoin and were then randomly assigned to receive 30% SSA or not on each side of the face with 2-week intervals for four sessions. Photos, the number of lesions, GAGS score, skin indices (melanin, erythema, pore, and texture), hydration, and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) were assessed at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 10 weeks. Side effects, efficacy, and satisfactory rates were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients completed the study. Oral isotretinoin combined with SSA decreased response time compared to isotretinoin monotherapy, with significantly improved GAGS score, count of lesions, and efficacy (%) at 4-6 weeks. Skin indices of melanin, erythema, pore, and texture evaluated at week 10 were improved as well. Oral isotretinoin with or without SSA was effective by the lesion clearance; only SSA significantly improved the TEWL. All the side effects were temporary and tolerable, and no adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSION: Oral low-dose isotretinoin combined with 30% SSA is safe and effective, which advanced the onset of action and improves lesion clearance.

Therapeutic efficacy and safety of three different modalities in pediatric patients with plantar warts.

Human papillomavirus infection is relatively common in communities. Thus, determining an effective and painless treatment method, especially in pediatric patients is of utmost importance. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of three different methods of treating plantar warts in pediatric patients. Children with verruca plantaris treated with a salicylic acid-lactic acid combination once daily (SA/LA 1), a salicylic acid-lactic acid combination applied in three to seven layers under occlusion every 3 days (SA/LA 2), or a combination of 5-fluorouracil (0.5%) and salicylic acid (10%) (SA/5-FU) were evaluated retrospectively. Treatment responses and recurrence rates were also evaluated after a minimum of 4 months. Among the 98 children with verruca plantaris, 19 were treated with SA/LA 1, 53 were treated with SA/LA 2, and 18 were treated with SA/5-FU; the eight patients who received cryotherapy were excluded. The mean treatment duration was significantly shorter in the SA/LA 2 group than in the SA/LA 1 group and the SA/5-FU group. (p = 0.000 for both) Application of a salicylic acid-lactic acid combination in multiple layers under occlusion is a safe, painless, and effective treatment method for plantar warts in children.

Severe corneal burn due to the accidental application of salicylic acid packed in a plastic dropper bottle. / Quemadura corneal grave debida a la aplicación accidental de ácido salicílico envasado en un frasco gotero plástico

Eye burns due to the accidental application of pharmacological or nonpharmacological substances packaged in plastic dropper bottles have been described for more than three decades and continue to occur. These burns can cause potentially serious corneal injuries. We report the case of a patient who mistakenly applied salicylic acid to the right eye after confusing it with an eye lubricant, which caused him a severe corneal burn. Fortunately, after aggressive medical and surgical management (including oxygen therapy and amniotic membrane grafting), the visual results were good. We suggest conducting educational campaigns and taking legislative measures in our country to avoid packaging corrosive substances in this type of dropper bottle to reduce the risk of accidental burns.

Las quemaduras oculares por aplicación accidental de sustancias farmacológicas o no farmacológicas envasadas en frascos goteros plásticos, se han descrito desde hace más de tres décadas y siguen ocurriendo. Estas quemaduras pueden causar lesiones potencialmente graves de la córnea. Se presenta el caso de un paciente que se aplicó ácido salicílico en el ojo derecho al confundir el envase con el de un lubricante ocular, lo que le causó una grave quemadura corneal. Afortunadamente, tras un manejo médico y quirúrgico agresivo (incluida oxigenoterapia e injerto de membrana amniótica) los resultados visuales fueron buenos. Se sugiere hacer campañas educativas y adoptar normas en el país para evitar el envase de sustancias corrosivas en este tipo de frascos goteros, con el fin de disminuir el riesgo de quemaduras accidentales.

Efficacy and safety of a new topical gel formulation containing retinol encapsulated in glycospheres and hydroxypinacolone retinoate, an antimicrobial peptide, salicylic acid, glycolic acid and niacinamide for the treatment of mild acne: preliminary results of a 2-month prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris is a common and chronic skin disease that impacts on physical and psychological perceptions. Combination therapy with topical retinoids and antimicrobial agent is considered the preferred approach for most of the subjects affected by mild-to-moderate acne. A correct therapeutic management should include a prolonged treatment to ensure therapeutic success and to prevent recurrences. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a new topical gel formulation that combines retinol encapsulated in glycospheres and hydroxypinacolone retinoate, associated with an anti-microbial peptide (BIOPEP-15) salicylic acid, glycolic acid, and niacinamide as monotherapy in mild acne vulgaris. METHODS: A 2-month prospective study was conducted at the Unit of Dermatology of the Federico II University. Twenty-five patients aged from 14 to 30 years with mild acne of the face (GAGS score ≤ 18) were consecutively enrolled. Each patient was asked to apply the gel formulation once daily in the evening for 8 weeks. The number of acne lesions with VISIA camera system, the global acne grading system (GAGS) score, trans epidermal water loss (TEWL), skin colorimetry (X-rite Spectrocolorimeter), reflectance confocal microscopy exam were evaluated at baseline, after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment for each patient. Tolerability and safety of the product were also evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-five female patients with a median age of 23.4 were enrolled. Twenty-two (88%) completed the 2-month treatment period visits. At baseline the total acne lesion number, mean (SD), was 5.5 (4) and the GAG score 9 (4). A significant (P=0.001) reduction in number of total acne lesions was observed at week 4 (-57%) and at week 8 (-80%). All patients presented a significant reduction of the GAGS score values: -42% at week 4 and -78% at week 8, confirming the clinical efficacy of the product. At baseline TEWL was 10.2 g/m2/h (1.3) and 10.7 (1.4) at week 8, thus showing that the gel did not impair the skin barrier function. Skin colorimetry was significantly (P=0.0015) reduced by the treatment in comparison with baseline (62 vs. 58). Efficacy of the gel formulation was also confirmed with RCM exams, showing a reduction of dermal inflammation and exocytosis, and an improvement of infundibular hyperkeratinization. We observed that adherence to treatment correlated positively with the improvement of the single parameters. Moreover, side effects such as erythema, dryness, and excessive xerosis were not reported, resulting in a complete adherence to the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide favorable evidences of the efficacy and safety of this new product as a first line treatment in patients with mild acne, or, as a maintenance therapy for prolonged periods after the suspension of a systemic treatment. Furthermore, the tolerability of this topical product and the absence of any side effects increased the adherence to the therapy.

Efficacy and safety of Jessner's solution peel in comparison with salicylic acid 30% peel in the management of patients with acne vulgaris and postacne hyperpigmentation with skin of color: a randomized, double-blinded, split-face, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Antibiotics and retinoids have been used for acne vulgaris for decades. Though effective, each has its own drawbacks. Chemical peels have been used for treatment of acne vulgaris with inadequate clinical evidence. We sought to determine the efficacy and safety of Jessner's solution (JS) in comparison with salicylic acid (SA) 30% in the management of acne vulgaris and postacne hyperpigmentation in patients with colored skin. METHODS: A total of 36 subjects (94.5% Fitzpatick Type IV-V) were recruited in this randomized double-blinded, split-face, controlled trial. Each side of the face was randomly assigned for treatment with either JS or SA. Subjects were treated once fortnightly for a total of three sessions. Lesion counting, Michaelsson acne score (MAS), photographs, and postacne hyperpigmentation index (PAHPI) were used to objectively assess the improvement. Complications were assessed during each visit. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS v22.0. Significance was set at P = 0.05. RESULTS: At the end of therapy, significant reduction in inflammatory, noninflammatory lesions, MAS, and PAHPI scores (P < 0.001, respectively) were noted in comparison to baseline. Mixed model analysis revealed no significant outcome difference between the two groups. Patients who reported good and very good outcome were 76.4% (JS) and 85.3% (SA). Burning, stinging sensation, and exfoliation were the common complications reported. Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation was reported only once in the JS arm. CONCLUSION: Both JS and SA were equally effective in the treatment of acne vulgaris and reducing postacne hyperpigmentation in patients with colored skin.

An interim internal Threshold of Toxicologic Concern (iTTC) for chemicals in consumer products, with support from an automated assessment of ToxCast™ dose response data.

Additional non-animal methods are urgently needed to meet regulatory and animal welfare goals. TTC is a broadly used risk assessment tool. TTC based on external dose has limited utility for multi-route exposure and some types of structure activity relationship assessments. An internal TTC (iTTC), where thresholds are based on blood concentration, would extend the applicability of TTC. While work is on-going to develop robust iTTC thresholds, we propose an interim conservative iTTC. Specifically, an interim iTTC of 1 µM, supported by the published experience of the pharmaceutical industry, a literature review of non-drug chemical/receptor interactions, and analysis of ToxCast™ data. ToxCast™ data were used to explore activity versus the 1 µM interim iTTC and recommendations for the analysis and interpretation of HTS data. Test concentration-based points of departure were classified to identify quality of fit to the Hill Model. We identified, for exclusion from the approach, estrogen receptor and androgen receptor targets as potent chemical/receptor interactions potentially associated with low dose exposure to non-pharmaceutical active ingredients in addition to the original TTC exclusions. With these exclusions, we conclude that a 1 µM plasma concentration is unlikely to be associated with significant biological effects from chemicals not intentionally designed for biological activity.

Combination therapy with salicylic acid chemical peels, glycyrrhizin compound, and vitamin C for Riehl's melanosis.

BACKGROUND: Riehl's melanosis is a chronic, refractory disorder, which can adversely affect patient's quality of life. Intense pulse light, neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser, hydroquinone, tranexamic acid have been reported to treat this disease, but there have been few reports on the effectiveness of other treatments. AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of triple combination therapy with salicylic acid chemical peels, oral glycyrrhizin compound, and vitamin C for Riehl's melanosis. PATIENTS/METHODS: Three patients diagnosed with Riehl's melanosis were enrolled. All patients were treated with glycyrrhizin compound (150 mg/d), vitamin C (100 mg/d), and salicylic acid 30% peels once every 2 weeks. Clinical photographs and VISIA were used to assess the efficacy. RESULTS: All patients received obvious improvement and reported no obvious side effects. CONCLUSION: Triple combination therapy with salicylic acid peels, oral glycyrrhizin compound, and vitamin C is a safe and effective modality for Riehl's melanosis.