Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 66
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Case Rep ; 13(10)2020 Oct 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33033002

RESUMEN

Our communication presents a prenatally detected case with severe spinal defect detected in the first trimester of pregnancy, accompanied by a large skin-covered myelomeningocele but normal cranio-cerebral structural appearance.These findings suggest that in the first trimester, the extent of the spinal defect, the cerebrospinal fluid leakage to a large, but skin-covered, meningocele and fixation of the spinal cord at the lesion are not sufficient to determine downward hindbrain displacement and the development of secondary signs for open spina bifida.Therefore, we suggest a careful evaluation of the fetal cerebral features if a meningocele is detected. The presence of the skin covering the lesion may not be evident in the first trimester, but the absence of intracranial open spina bifida markers may indicate a 'closed' spinal defect, which generally associates a good neurological outcome. Also, studies aimed to investigate the accuracy of the intracranial features for open spina bifida detection should consider the possibility of 'closed' myelomeningoceles to avoid incorrect correlations.


Asunto(s)
Anomalías Múltiples/diagnóstico , Aborto Eugénico/métodos , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Cráneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Espina Bífida Quística/diagnóstico , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/métodos , Feto Abortado/patología , Adulto , Errores Diagnósticos/prevención & control , Femenino , Feto/diagnóstico por imagen , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Meningomielocele , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/métodos
2.
J Clin Ultrasound ; 48(5): 298-300, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32302016

RESUMEN

Cesarean scar pregnancies are relatively rare. In the first trimester, if the decision is made to terminate the pregnancy, it should be done as soon as possible to avoid complications. We report a successful termination of a live, 6 weeks and 4 days cesarean scar pregnancy using a double-balloon cervical ripening catheter in a patient with two previous cesarean deliveries.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Eugénico/métodos , Cateterismo/métodos , Maduración Cervical , Embarazo Ectópico/terapia , Solución Salina/administración & dosificación , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Adulto , Cesárea , Cicatriz , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Embarazo Ectópico/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/métodos
3.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 49(1): 101633, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31499281

RESUMEN

Multifetal gestation is often complicated by the development of preeclampsia. In some twin gestations, preeclampsia develops in association with restricted fetal growth of only one fetus. Instead of termination of the entire pregnancy, we investigated an alternative approach to the management of such pregnancies that might allow unharmed survival of the normal twin. We present a case of preeclampsia in twin discordance with severe fetal growth restriction at 25 weeks of gestation. Preeclampsia was linked to a lethal condition in one twin and was treated with selective feticide in an effort to reverse preeclampsia. Inasmuch as the fetal prognosis was extremely poor for the abnormal fetus, selective feticide was a reasonable therapeutic option. Maternal symptoms resolved, allowing continuation of the pregnancy for 4 weeks before delivery of the healthy fetus. We maintain that selective termination induced a decrease in the release of substances involved in the physiopathology of preeclampsia, which allowed the continuation of the pregnancy with close follow-up. This report highlights the link between placental pathology and the disease process of preeclampsia and further supports selective termination as a reasonable management strategy in carefully selected cases of discordant twins.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Eugénico/métodos , Aborto Terapéutico/métodos , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal , Preeclampsia/terapia , Embarazo Gemelar , Adulto , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Síndrome HELLP/diagnóstico , Síndrome HELLP/terapia , Humanos , Embarazo , Pronóstico , Gemelos Dicigóticos
4.
Prenat Diagn ; 39(8): 595-602, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31063215

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: As prenatal diagnostic services expand throughout low-income countries, an important consideration is the appropriateness of these services for patients. In these countries, services now include prenatal ultrasound and occasionally genetic testing. To assess patient interest, we surveyed pregnant patients at a hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, on their preferences for prenatal testing and termination of affected pregnancies for congenital anomalies and genetic diseases. METHOD: One hundred one pregnant patients were surveyed on their preferences for prenatal testing and termination of affected pregnancies using a survey covering various congenital anomalies and genetic diseases. RESULTS: Eighty-nine percent of patients reported interest in testing for all conditions. Three percent of patients were not interested in any testing. Over 60% of patients reported interest in termination for anencephaly, early infant death, severe intellectual disability, hemoglobinopathy, and amelia. Patients were more likely to express interest in prenatal testing and termination for conditions associated with a shortened lifespan. CONCLUSION: Ethiopian patients were interested in prenatal testing and termination of pregnancy for many conditions. Advancing prenatal diagnostic capacities is a potential strategy for addressing the incidence of congenital anomalies and genetic disease in Ethiopia. Importantly, there exist many factors and technological limitations to consider before implementation.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Eugénico , Anomalías Congénitas/terapia , Feto/anomalías , Enfermedades Genéticas Congénitas/terapia , Prioridad del Paciente , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Aborto Eugénico/métodos , Aborto Eugénico/psicología , Aborto Eugénico/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anomalías Congénitas/epidemiología , Anomalías Congénitas/psicología , Etiopía/epidemiología , Femenino , Feto/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Genéticas Congénitas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Genéticas Congénitas/epidemiología , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Pruebas Genéticas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Prioridad del Paciente/psicología , Prioridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Diagnóstico Prenatal/psicología , Diagnóstico Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
5.
Womens Health Issues ; 29(4): 349-355, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31085003

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Despite women's preference for induction of labor (IOL) or dilation and evacuation (D&E) for pregnancy termination in the setting of second trimester fetal or pregnancy abnormality, many women are not given a choice between delivery methods. We investigated patient and clinical related factors associated with selecting IOL or D&E. METHODS: This retrospective cohort experienced pregnancy termination at 17-24 weeks of gestation for fetal anomaly, intrauterine fetal demise, or premature previable rupture. We compared the demographic, reproductive, social, and clinical experience variables between women who select IOL and D&E, adjusting for confounders through logistic regression. RESULTS: One hundred eleven women (21.6%) selected IOL and 403 (78.4%) selected D&E. Greater proportions of women of color (p < .01), lower education (p < .01), lower employment (p < .01), and lower status jobs (p < .01) selected IOL. Women selected D&E more often for chromosomal anomaly (p < .01). In adjusted analyses, women with intrauterine fetal demise (odds ratio [OR], 9.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8-34.7), premature previable rupture (OR, 110; 95% CI, 23.0-526.8), prior substance use disorder (OR, 35.5; 95% CI-2.7, 473.7), or counseling from obstetrics (OR, 3.3; 95% CI-1.3, 8.4), pediatrics (OR, 3.3; 95% CI-1.3, 8.6), or social services (OR, 12.6; 95% CI, 4.2-37.3) had higher odds of selecting IOL. CONCLUSIONS: Patient characteristics, medical factors, and type of counseling are associated with the selection between D&E and IOL for anomalous pregnancies. Institutional, regional, and state policies should permit women both delivery methods to preserve autonomous decision-making at the time of pregnancy termination.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Eugénico/métodos , Aborto Inducido/métodos , Consejo , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/métodos , Participación del Paciente , Legrado por Aspiración , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Anomalías Congénitas , Femenino , Muerte Fetal , Humanos , Embarazo , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
Gynecol Obstet Invest ; 84(1): 64-70, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30099458

RESUMEN

AIM: To evaluate the effect of intracardiac potassium chloride feticide procedure (FP) on the induction-to-abortion (I-to-A) interval for various indications in the termination of pregnancy. METHOD: Medically indicated abortions between 17 and 28 weeks' gestation were retrospectively evaluated and allocated into 2 groups: Cases with (group 1, n = 58) or without an FP (group 2, n = 60). I-to-A intervals were compared across the groups, considering different baseline parameters and fetal abnormality categories. RESULTS: There were no differences among the groups except in gestational age (GA; mean, 21.2 vs. 19.6 weeks, p = 0.01) in group 1. Overall, the I-to-A interval was shorter (900 ± 233 vs. 1,198 ± 375 min, p = 0.001) and prolonged medical abortion (I-to-A interval > 48 h) was less common (2% vs. 6%, p = 0.03) in group 1. The facilitating effect of FP persisted when indications were categorized as central nervous system, chromosomal, other structural abnormalities, and unclassified conditions. Logistic regression analyses demonstrated the following features to be associated with expulsion of fetus after 24-h: (1) advanced GA (> 24 week; aOR 6.9, 95% CI 3.24-14.72), (2) central nervous system abnormalities (aOR 5.3, 95% CI 2.6-11.4), (3) lack of feticide (aOR 3.67, 95% CI 2.24-10.72). CONCLUSION: FPs seem to shorten the I-to-A interval and decrease prolonged I-to-A interval rates. This facilitating effect remains unchanged for various medical indications.


Asunto(s)
Abortivos no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Aborto Eugénico/métodos , Misoprostol/administración & dosificación , Cloruro de Potasio/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Femenino , Corazón Fetal , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Inyecciones , Embarazo , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
7.
Patient Educ Couns ; 101(10): 1859-1864, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29980336

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The decision to undergo a surgical or medical method of second-trimester termination for pregnancy complications should be preference-sensitive. Decision satisfaction has not been described in this population; understanding how women describe decision satisfaction in this setting could inform decision support efforts. METHODS: We conducted qualitative interviews with women one to three weeks after termination who chose either a surgical or medical termination for fetal anomalies, pregnancy complications or fetal demise. We analyzed transcripts using modified grounded theory in an iterative manner with a generative thematic approach. RESULTS: We interviewed 36 women (24 surgical and 12 medical). Subjects connected decision satisfaction with counseling experiences and their personal values, including (1) importance of adequate information, (2) autonomous decision making, and (3) choosing the method that facilitates coping. CONCLUSION: Offering women a choice between surgical and medical termination procedures in the setting of pregnancy complications is integral to decision satisfaction. Women in our study reported wanting this decision to be driven by their personal values. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Women should be able to choose between surgical and medical termination based on preference and not availability of services. Decision support from women's health providers should be based on values clarification and providing accurate information.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Eugénico/psicología , Aborto Inducido/psicología , Conducta de Elección , Anomalías Congénitas , Toma de Decisiones , Satisfacción del Paciente , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Abortivos/administración & dosificación , Aborto Eugénico/métodos , Aborto Inducido/métodos , Adaptación Psicológica , Adulto , Consejo , Dilatación y Legrado Uterino , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Participación del Paciente , Prioridad del Paciente , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Investigación Cualitativa
8.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 31(6): 740-746, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28277915

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess fetal abnormalities leading to very late termination of pregnancy (VLTOP) performed after 32 weeks' gestation. METHOD: The study population included all pregnant women with singleton pregnancy that underwent VLTOP in our institute because of fetal indications between the years 1998 and 2015. RESULTS: Fifty-seven cases (2.0%) were at ≥32 weeks' gestation and are the subjects of the current study. Our VLTOP cases were subdivided into four categories according to the sequence of events that led to the decision for VLTOP: (1) No routine prenatal screening with an incidental fetal finding discovered after 32 weeks' gestation (9 fetuses ∼16%); (2) Routine early prenatal care raised suspicion of abnormalities, and the final diagnosis was established by additional tests (8 fetuses, ∼14%); (3) Developmental findings detected during the third trimester (21 fetuses; ∼37%), and (4) fetal abnormalities that could have been detected earlier during pregnancy (19 fetuses; ∼33%). CONCLUSIONS: The two categories in which the pregnant women did not underwent any fetal evaluation (i.e. group 1) or those that could have been detected earlier (i.e. group 4) consists ∼49% from our cohort in which VLTOP could have been avoided.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Eugénico/métodos , Enfermedades Fetales/epidemiología , Feto/anomalías , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Aborto Eugénico/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adulto , Femenino , Enfermedades Fetales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Fetales/genética , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Israel/epidemiología , Embarazo , Tercer Trimestre del Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos
9.
Prenat Diagn ; 36(1): 92-9, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26531671

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore maternal-fetal medicine specialists' experiences of conducting feticide in late termination of pregnancy. METHODS: Participants were recruited via email. Purposeful sampling resulted in ten maternal-fetal specialists. Semistructured interviews were used to examine their experiences of conducting feticide. Interviews occurred across four English National Health Service hospitals. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was used. RESULTS: An ongoing doctor-patient relationship when conducting feticide facilitated participants' self-image as clinicians rather than technicians. Coping involved rationalisation, with feticide viewed as 'part of the job'. Supportive team relationships helped keep emotional expression within control. Participants were not distressed if they felt, through relationship-based decision-making, that the feticide aligned with their values and legal interpretation. To avoid negative judgements, they disclosed selectively, only telling trusted individuals that they conducted feticides. CONCLUSIONS: Participants experienced conducting feticides as difficult but necessary, eliciting pride from the skills involved. Some noted management of personal distress. Optimal conditions were involvement in the process from the initial decision-making and team support. Providing feticides was deemed as potentially stigmatising, with selective disclosure employed. Training in managing feticides and guidance on providing optimal service conditions may decrease selectivity of disclosures and enhance staff well-being and the quality of feticide provisions. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Eugénico/psicología , Aborto Terapéutico/psicología , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Perinatología , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , Aborto Eugénico/ética , Aborto Eugénico/métodos , Aborto Terapéutico/ética , Aborto Terapéutico/métodos , Inglaterra , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Embarazo , Investigación Cualitativa
10.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 29(5): 850-4, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25758628

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of 100 µg intravenous shot of carbetocin compared to 20 IU oxytocin intravenous infusion to prevent placental retention in second trimester medical termination of pregnancy. METHODS: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted at Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital from 1 April 2013 to 30 November 2013. A total of 132 women between 14 and 24 weeks gestation indicated for termination were randomized to receive either 20 IU oxytocin infusion (n = 66) or 100 µg carbetocin shot (n = 66) after fetal expulsion. Patients were observed for time elapsed between fetal and placental expulsion, presence of placental retention and blood loss. RESULTS: Third stage was 33.4 ± 20.4 min in oxytocin group & 23.1 ± 16.8 min in carbetocin group (p = 0.002). Eight patients (12.1%) in oxytocin group had complete placental retention versus two patients (3.0%) in carbetocin group (p = 0.05). Eight patients (13.8%) received oxytocin had remnants of placenta compared to four patients (6.2%) received carbetocin (p = 0.04). Sixteen patients (24.2%) received oxytocin and six patients (9%) received carbetocin needed surgical curettage (p = 0.04). Third stage blood loss was 87.2 ± 33.7 ml in carbetocin and 206.9 ± 35.2 ml in oxytocin groups (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Carbetocin is superior to oxytocin infusion for management of placental delivery in second trimester abortion.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Eugénico/métodos , Oxitocina/análogos & derivados , Oxitocina/administración & dosificación , Retención de la Placenta/prevención & control , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , Aborto Eugénico/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración Intravenosa , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Proyectos Piloto , Placenta/efectos de los fármacos , Retención de la Placenta/epidemiología , Hemorragia Posparto/epidemiología , Hemorragia Posparto/prevención & control , Embarazo , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
11.
Pan Afr Med J ; 25: 256, 2016.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28293372

RESUMEN

This study aims to evaluate the value of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis by comparing it with the results of the fetopathological examination in case of therapeutic interruption of pregnancy for fetal indication. We conducted a retrospective descriptive and analytical study carried out over a three-year period from January 2013 to December 2015. It involved 66 fetuses autopsied after therapeutic interruption of pregnancy for fetal indication. Fetopathological examination confirmed ultrasound results in 63 cases (95.4%). In 18 cases (27.2%) there was a full match between the results of the prenatal diagnosis and those of the autopsy. Nine percent of fetal malformations were detected in the first trimester. The majority of malformations (72%) were detected in the second timester. Neurological malformations were the most frequent (60%), dominated by hydrocephalus and anencephaly. This study shows that, in our clinical context, even if ultrasound diagnosis is often non-exhaustive, its signs indicating the need for interruptions of pregnancy are correct. Fetopathological examination is used, in this case, to detect unknown malformations, making it possible to specify the diagnosis and to implement a strategy for subsequent pregnancies.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Eugénico/métodos , Feto/diagnóstico por imagen , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/métodos , Adulto , Autopsia , Femenino , Feto/anomalías , Humanos , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Túnez , Adulto Joven
12.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 29(7): 1066-71, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25897638

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: A cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is an extremely rare form of an ectopic pregnancy, which is defined as the localization of a fertilized ovum surrounded by uterine muscular fiber and scar tissue. The objective of this study was to discuss the management options for CSPs in a singleton center. In the current study, we discussed the current management options for CSPs based on our 6 years of experience. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of diagnosed and treated 26 patients with CSPs in Istanbul Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital during a 6-year period was discussed. Suction curettage was performed as first-line treatment in patients with a gestation <8 weeks and myometrial thickness >2 mm. RESULTS: Twenty-two (84.6%) patients with CSPs were initially treated surgically (curettage and hysterotomy) and four (15.4%) patients were treated medically with methotrexate injections. Vacuum aspiration was performed in 19 patients as a first-line treatment, six of them needed an additional Foley balloon catheter to be inserted for tamponade because of persistent vaginal bleeding. Suction curettage was successful in 12 patients. The treatment rate for suction curettage with or without Foley balloon catheter tamponade was 16 of 19 (84.2%). CONCLUSION: The early diagnosis of a CSP (7-8 weeks gestation) with a ß-hCG level <17.000 mIU/ml and a myometrial thickness >2 mm can be treated with suction curettage with or without placement of a uterine Foley balloon as curative treatment.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Cicatriz/cirugía , Embarazo Ectópico/cirugía , Legrado por Aspiración , Aborto Eugénico/efectos adversos , Aborto Eugénico/métodos , Adulto , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Cicatriz/complicaciones , Cicatriz/epidemiología , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Histerectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Paridad , Embarazo , Embarazo Ectópico/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Legrado por Aspiración/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven
13.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (11): CD009954, 2015 Nov 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26559875

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Medications or mechanical dilators are often used to soften and dilate the cervix prior to surgical evacuation of the uterus for non-viable pregnancy, or miscarriage. The majority of miscarriages occur in the first trimester. The aim of cervical ripening is to reduce the possibility of injury to the uterus and cervix and improve the surgical ease of the procedure. Cervical ripening agents can have adverse effects and it is uncertain as to whether these risks outweigh the benefits of their use. OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the benefits and harms of using cervical ripening agents prior to surgical evacuation of non-viable pregnancy prior to 14 weeks' gestation. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 April 2015) and reference lists of retrieved papers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (published in full-text form, or as abstracts only), which assessed the use of pharmacological or mechanical agents to ripen the cervix in women undergoing dilation and curettage or vacuum aspiration for non-viable pregnancy at less than 14 weeks' gestation were eligible for inclusion. Cluster-randomised controlled trials and trials using a cross-over design were not eligible for inclusion.Unpublished randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials would have been eligible for inclusion but none were identified. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed the studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and carried out data extraction. Data were checked for accuracy. MAIN RESULTS: We included nine trials with 469 women. A diverse set of medications and regimens were studied in these trials, making the comparisons available for meta-analysis limited. The comparisons draw data from six trials with 383 participants. All trials were relatively small and had several aspects of unclear risk of bias with few of this review's outcomes reported. Due to this, no data from three trials were able to be used despite them meeting inclusion criteria.We carried out four comparisons: isosorbide mononitrate or dinitrate compared with misoprostol; misoprostol compared with placebo; chemical dilation (use of medications) compared with mechanical dilation; and any cervical preparation compared with placebo.None of the included studies reported data on the review's primary outcome: cervical or uterine injury (perforation, laceration, creation of a false passage).No clear difference was shown between isosorbide compounds and misoprostol for the outcome need for manual cervical dilation (average risk ratio (RR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10 to 5.64; three trials, 150 women; Tau² = 2.11; I² = 69%), however the data were heterogenous. In terms of adverse effects, misoprostol was associated with more vomiting (RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.85; two trials, 120 women), however there were no clear differences between isosorbide compounds and misoprostol in relation to other reported adverse effects (headache, nausea or hypotension). The dosing regimens differed in terms of dose, number of administrations and route of administration in the different trials. Mechanical (Dilapan-S hygroscopic) dilators performed similarly to chemical dilators in a single trial (65 women) that measured difficulty in cervical dilation, excessive bleeding and adverse effects.Misoprostol was shown to be more effective than placebo for cervical ripening (reduced need for manual cervical dilation) (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.26; one trial, 120 women), and surgical time was reduced when misoprostol was used (mean difference (MD) -3.15, 95% CI -3.59 to -2.70; one trial, 120 women). However, compared to placebo, misoprostol, was associated with more abdominal pain (RR 29.00, 95% CI 1.77 to 475.35; one trial, 120 women), although no clear differences in the risk of other adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, headache or fever) were observed between groups.There was no clear differences between chemical dilation and mechanical dilators for the outcomes: difficulty in cervical dilation, excessive bleeding or adverse effects.Compared with placebo, any cervical preparation reduced the need for manual cervical dilatation (average RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.89; two trials, 168 women; Tau² = 0.67; I² = 81%), and reduced surgical time (MD -2.55, 95% CI -3.67 to -1.43, two trials, 168 women; Tau² = 0.63; I² = 96%).None of the included trials reported on the review's other secondary outcomes, including: injury to bladder or bowel, miscarriage/preterm birth in a subsequent pregnancy, analgesia use after administration of ripening agent but before surgery, or analgesia use after surgery. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review found no evidence to evaluate cervical ripening prior to first trimester surgical evacuation for miscarriage for reducing the rate of cervical or uterine injury, however, this may be because these outcomes are very rare. Cervical preparation was shown to reduce the need for manual cervical dilatation compared with placebo.Misoprostol and isosorbide mononitrate and dinitrate were similarly effective in ripening the cervix, however there was more vomiting with misoprostol. Mechanical (Dilapan-S hygroscopic) dilators performed similarly to chemical dilators.The nine studies included in this review were small and the methodological quality of the trials was mixed, and for the most part, not well-described; thus any conclusions drawn from the data included in this review must be treated with caution. Consequently, large, high-quality trials are required to determine whether the benefits of this treatment outweigh the risks. Further research should be powered to assess the rate of cervical and uterine injury between interventions. Future research should also guide clinicians in deciding whether the benefits of reduced manual cervical dilatation outweigh the risks of adverse effects associated with these agents (nausea, vomiting, headache, fever, diarrhoea and pain). Women's satisfaction and outcomes of future pregnancies should also be assessed.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Eugénico/métodos , Aborto Espontáneo/terapia , Maduración Cervical , Dilatación/métodos , Oxitócicos , Adulto , Maduración Cervical/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Humanos , Dinitrato de Isosorbide/administración & dosificación , Dinitrato de Isosorbide/efectos adversos , Dinitrato de Isosorbide/análogos & derivados , Primer Periodo del Trabajo de Parto , Misoprostol/administración & dosificación , Misoprostol/efectos adversos , Oxitócicos/administración & dosificación , Oxitócicos/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
14.
Pediatr Nephrol ; 30(9): 1443-9, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25820996

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We studied the correlation between prenatal diagnosis and postmortem investigations in pregnancies terminated for renal malformations. METHODS: Over a 5-year period, 77 cases of termination of pregnancy (TOP) for renal malformations were reviewed. Chromosomal anomalies (n = 9) and cases without conventional or virtual autopsy were excluded (n = 15). In 53 cases, prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and conventional autopsy findings were compared. In addition, we compared the accuracy of conventional and virtual autopsy findings in 17 cases. RESULTS: Full agreement was observed in 60.4% (32/53) of cases. In 26.4% (14/53) of the cases, the presence of additional malformations did not alter the final diagnosis. However, in 11.3% (6/53) the final diagnosis was adjusted because of major additional findings. One case showed a total disagreement. Conventional and virtual autopsy were in full agreement in 52.9% (9/17). Postmortem magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) description and detection of malformations was less complete and failed to correctly diagnose 5/17 cases (29.4%). In 17.6% (3/17) of the cases, postmortem MRI revealed malformations not confirmed by conventional autopsy. CONCLUSIONS: A high correlation between prenatal ultrasound and postmortem investigations was observed. Conventional autopsy remains the gold standard to reveal additional major and minor malformations, leading to a correct final diagnosis. The added value of virtual necropsy for renal pathology was limited.


Asunto(s)
Feto Abortado/patología , Autopsia , Enfermedades Fetales/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Anomalías Urogenitales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Urológicas/diagnóstico , Aborto Eugénico/métodos , Autopsia/métodos , Autopsia/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Enfermedades Fetales/cirugía , Alemania , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Diagnóstico Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/métodos , Anomalías Urogenitales/cirugía , Enfermedades Urológicas/congénito
15.
Contraception ; 91(3): 234-9, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25499590

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to qualitatively evaluate factors that contribute to and alleviate grief associated with termination of a pregnancy for a fetal anomaly and how that grief changes over time. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a longitudinal qualitative study of decision satisfaction, grief and coping among women undergoing termination (dilation and evacuation or induction termination) for fetal anomalies and other complications. We conducted three post-procedure interviews at 1-3 weeks, 3 months and 1 year. We used a generative thematic approach to analyze themes related to grief using NVivo software program. RESULTS: Of the 19 women in the overall study, 13 women's interviews were eligible for analysis of the grief experience. Eleven women completed all three interviews, and two completed only the first interview. Themes that contributed to grief include self-blame for the diagnosis, guilt around the termination decision, social isolation related to discomfort with abortion and grief triggered by reminders of pregnancy. Social support and time are mechanisms that serve to alleviate grief. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy termination in this context is experienced as a significant loss similar to other types of pregnancy loss and is also associated with real and perceived stigma. Women choosing termination for fetal anomalies may benefit from tailored counseling that includes dispelling misconceptions about cause of the anomaly. In addition, efforts to decrease abortion stigma and increase social support may improve women's experiences and lessen their grief response. IMPLICATIONS: The nature and course of grief after second-trimester termination for fetal anomaly are, as of yet, poorly understood. With improved understanding of how women grieve over time, clinicians can better recognize the significance of their patients' suffering and offer tools to direct their grief toward positive coping.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Eugénico/psicología , Pesar , Culpa , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo/psicología , Aborto Eugénico/métodos , Adaptación Psicológica , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Estudios Longitudinales , Embarazo , Investigación Cualitativa , Aislamiento Social/psicología , Estigma Social , Apoyo Social , Tiempo
16.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 35(2): 168-72, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25058716

RESUMEN

Choice of a medical or surgical method of termination for fetal anomaly (TFA) is advocated in national guidelines based on a similar risk profile. We investigated whether women are offered a choice of method, by surveying members of a UK parent support organisation. An online questionnaire was designed to examine respondents' experience of TFA. A total of 351 responses were included in the final analysis. TFAs after 24 weeks' gestation and selective reductions were excluded. Mean gestational age at TFA was 17 weeks; 14% (n = 50) were offered a choice of method, falling to 8% (n = 19) after 14 weeks' gestation. Overall, 78% (n = 275) underwent medical TFA with 88% stating they chose it because it was the only method offered; 60% (n = 30) of those offered a choice had a surgical TFA. Our survey suggests that women having TFA are not offered a choice of method. Service delivery should be improved to meet national guidance and women's needs.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Eugénico/métodos , Aberraciones Cromosómicas , Anomalías Congénitas , Participación del Paciente , Inglaterra , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Embarazo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
18.
Harefuah ; 153(8): 453-7, 499, 498, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Hebreo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25286634

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Trisomy 18 and 13 are the most common autosomal trisomies, after trisomy 21, and their frequency is rising due to the increased maternal age of pregnant women. The fetuses suffer from multi-organ damage that may lead to many gestational complications as well as short life expectancy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the indications for prenatal karyotyping of trisomy 13 (T-13, Patau syndrome) and trisomy 18 (T-18, Edwards syndrome) during pregnancy in our medical center. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study involved all singleton pregnancies locally diagnosed or referred to our Institute because of T-13 and T-18, during the years 1998-2011. RESULTS: There were 1879 cases of termination of pregnancies (TOPs) because of fetal indications, of them 53 cases of T-18 and 10 cases of T-13. The main indications for prenatal karyotyping in our study group were abnormal sonographic findings during anomaLy scans. In addition, 7 newborns with T-18 and 3 infants with T-13 were born in our hospital during the same period of time. We examined all cases that led to the Live birth of newborns with chromosomal anomalies, stemming from the Lack of extraction of the tests mentioned above and/or ignoring findings that raise suspicion that requires performing prenatal karyotyping during pregnancy. DISCUSSION: Our findings corresponded with other studies and showed that prenatal diagnosis of T-13/T-18 due to abnormal sonographic finding is rising. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that it was possible to identify the vast majority of T-13/T-18 among the pregnant women who had an increased risk based on a combination of the routine screening tests applied in Israel.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Eugénico , Trastornos de los Cromosomas , Trisomía , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Aborto Eugénico/métodos , Aborto Eugénico/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Trastornos de los Cromosomas/diagnóstico , Trastornos de los Cromosomas/epidemiología , Trastornos de los Cromosomas/genética , Cromosomas Humanos Par 13/genética , Cromosomas Humanos Par 18/genética , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Pruebas Genéticas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Israel/epidemiología , Cariotipificación/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/organización & administración , Edad Materna , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Trisomía/diagnóstico , Trisomía/genética , Síndrome de la Trisomía 13 , Síndrome de la Trisomía 18 , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/métodos , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos
20.
J Clin Ultrasound ; 42(6): 355-9, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24281983

RESUMEN

Sirenomelia or "mermaid syndrome" is a rare congenital abnormality with an incidence of 1 in 60,000. We report a case diagnosed in the first trimester using two-dimensional, three-dimensional, and color Doppler ultrasound. With increasing emphasis on early diagnosis of fetal abnormalities, this case highlights the importance of looking for anomalies in the first trimester itself. In fact, the diagnosis of sirenomelia should be easier in the first trimester as severe oligohydramnios in later gestation hampers vision.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Eugénico/métodos , Ectromelia/diagnóstico por imagen , Deformidades Congénitas de las Extremidades Inferiores/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/métodos , Consejo , Ectromelia/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Deformidades Congénitas de las Extremidades Inferiores/diagnóstico , Paridad , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Enfermedades Raras , Ultrasonografía Doppler en Color/métodos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA