Door-in-Door-out Times for Interhospital Transfer of Patients With Stroke.

Importance: Treatments for time-sensitive acute stroke are not available at every hospital, often requiring interhospital transfer. Current guidelines recommend hospitals achieve a door-in-door-out time of no more than 120 minutes at the transferring emergency department (ED). Objective: To evaluate door-in-door-out times for acute stroke transfers in the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Stroke registry and to identify patient and hospital factors associated with door-in-door-out times. Design, Setting, and Participants: US registry-based, retrospective study of patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke from January 2019 through December 2021 who were transferred from the ED at registry-affiliated hospitals to other acute care hospitals. Exposure: Patient- and hospital-level characteristics. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the door-in-door-out time (time of transfer out minus time of arrival to the transferring ED) as a continuous variable and a categorical variable (≤120 minutes, >120 minutes). Generalized estimating equation (GEE) regression models were used to identify patient and hospital-level characteristics associated with door-in-door-out time overall and in subgroups of patients with hemorrhagic stroke, acute ischemic stroke eligible for endovascular therapy, and acute ischemic stroke transferred for reasons other than endovascular therapy. Results: Among 108 913 patients (mean [SD] age, 66.7 [15.2] years; 71.7% non-Hispanic White; 50.6% male) transferred from 1925 hospitals, 67 235 had acute ischemic stroke and 41 678 had hemorrhagic stroke. Overall, the median door-in-door-out time was 174 minutes (IQR, 116-276 minutes): 29 741 patients (27.3%) had a door-in-door-out time of 120 minutes or less. The factors significantly associated with longer median times were age 80 years or older (vs 18-59 years; 14.9 minutes, 95% CI, 12.3 to 17.5 minutes), female sex (5.2 minutes; 95% CI, 3.6 to 6.9 minutes), non-Hispanic Black vs non-Hispanic White (8.2 minutes, 95% CI, 5.7 to 10.8 minutes), and Hispanic ethnicity vs non-Hispanic White (5.4 minutes, 95% CI, 1.8 to 9.0 minutes). The following were significantly associated with shorter median door-in-door-out time: emergency medical services prenotification (-20.1 minutes; 95% CI, -22.1 to -18.1 minutes), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score exceeding 12 vs a score of 0 to 1 (-66.7 minutes; 95% CI, -68.7 to -64.7 minutes), and patients with acute ischemic stroke eligible for endovascular therapy vs the hemorrhagic stroke subgroup (-16.8 minutes; 95% CI, -21.0 to -12.7 minutes). Among patients with acute ischemic stroke eligible for endovascular therapy, female sex, Black race, and Hispanic ethnicity were associated with a significantly higher door-in-door-out time, whereas emergency medical services prenotification, intravenous thrombolysis, and a higher NIHSS score were associated with significantly lower door-in-door-out times. Conclusions and Relevance: In this US registry-based study of interhospital transfer for acute stroke, the median door-in-door-out time was 174 minutes, which is longer than current recommendations for acute stroke transfer. Disparities and modifiable health system factors associated with longer door-in-door-out times are suitable targets for quality improvement initiatives.

Scoping Review of Racial, Ethnic, and Sex Disparities in the Diagnosis and Management of Hemorrhagic Stroke.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the United States, Black, Hispanic, and Asian Americans experience excessively high incidence rates of hemorrhagic stroke compared with White Americans. Women experience higher rates of subarachnoid hemorrhage than men. Previous reviews detailing racial, ethnic, and sex disparities in stroke have focused on ischemic stroke. We performed a scoping review of disparities in the diagnosis and management of hemorrhagic stroke in the United States to identify areas of disparities, research gaps, and evidence to inform efforts aimed at health equity. METHODS: We included studies published after 2010 that assessed racial and ethnic or sex disparities in the diagnosis or management of patients aged 18 years or older in the United States with a primary diagnosis of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage or aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. We did not include studies assessing disparities in incidence, risks, or mortality and functional outcomes of hemorrhagic stroke. RESULTS: After reviewing 6,161 abstracts and 441 full texts, 59 studies met our inclusion criteria. Four themes emerged. First, few data address disparities in acute hemorrhagic stroke. Second, racial and ethnic disparities in blood pressure control after intracerebral hemorrhage exist and likely contribute to disparities in recurrence rates. Third, racial and ethnic differences in end-of-life care exist, but further work is required to understand whether these differences represent true disparities in care. Fourth, very few studies specifically address sex disparities in hemorrhagic stroke care. DISCUSSION: Further efforts are necessary to delineate and correct racial, ethnic, and sex disparities in the diagnosis and management of hemorrhagic stroke.

A Novel Afrocentric Stroke Risk Assessment Score: Models from the Siren Study.

BACKGROUND: Stroke risk can be quantified using risk factors whose effect sizes vary by geography and race. No stroke risk assessment tool exists to estimate aggregate stroke risk for indigenous African. OBJECTIVES: To develop Afrocentric risk-scoring models for stroke occurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 3533 radiologically confirmed West African stroke cases paired 1:1 with age-, and sex-matched stroke-free controls in the SIREN study. The 7,066 subjects were randomly split into a training and testing set at the ratio of 85:15. Conditional logistic regression models were constructed by including 17 putative factors linked to stroke occurrence using the training set. Significant risk factors were assigned constant and standardized statistical weights based on regression coefficients (ß) to develop an additive risk scoring system on a scale of 0-100%. Using the testing set, Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed to obtain a total score to serve as cut-off to discriminate between cases and controls. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) at this cut-off. RESULTS: For stroke occurrence, we identified 15 traditional vascular factors. Cohen's kappa for validity was maximal at a total risk score of 56% using both statistical weighting approaches to risk quantification and in both datasets. The risk score had a predictive accuracy of 76% (95%CI: 74-79%), sensitivity of 80.3%, specificity of 63.0%, PPV of 68.5% and NPV of 76.2% in the test dataset. For ischemic strokes, 12 risk factors had predictive accuracy of 78% (95%CI: 74-81%). For hemorrhagic strokes, 7 factors had a predictive accuracy of 79% (95%CI: 73-84%). CONCLUSIONS: The SIREN models quantify aggregate stroke risk in indigenous West Africans with good accuracy. Prospective studies are needed to validate this instrument for stroke prevention.

Tissue-Based Stroke Definition Impacts Stroke Incidence but not Ethnic Differences.

OBJECTIVES: We explored how the new, tissue-based stroke definition impacted incidence estimates, including an ethnic comparison, in a population-based study. METHODS: Stroke patients, May, 2014-May, 2016 in Nueces County, Texas were ascertained and validated using source documentation. Overall, ethnic-specific and age-specific Poisson regression models were used to compare first-ever ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) incidence between old and new stroke definitions, adjusting for age, ethnicity, sex, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score. RESULTS: Among 1308 subjects, 1245 (95%) were defined as stroke by the old definition and 63 additional cases (5%) according to the new. There were 12 cases of parenchymal hematoma (PH1 or PH2) that were reclassified from ischemic stroke to ICH. Overall, incidence of ischemic stroke was slightly higher under the new compared to the old definition (RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.99-1.16); similarly higher in both Mexican Americans (RR 1.06; 95% CI 1.00-1.12) and Non Hispanic whites (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.97-1.22), p(ethnic difference)=0.36. Overall, incidence of ICH was higher under the new definition compared to old definition (RR 1.16; 95% CI 1.05-1.29), similarly higher among both Mexican Americans (RR 1.14; 95% CI 1.06-1.23) and Non Hispanic whites (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.03-1.39), p(ethnic difference)=0.25. CONCLUSION: Modest increases in ischemic stroke and ICH incidence occurred using the new compared with old stroke definition. There were no differences between Mexican Americans and non Hispanic whites. These estimates provide stroke burden estimates for public health planning.

Safety of antithrombotic therapy in East Asian patients.

Antithrombotic agents are widely used on the globe for prevention of thrombotic events such as atherothrombotic events and thromboembolic stroke in atrial fibrillation or for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. However, the net clinical benefit of antithrombotic intervention may differ substantially in various sub-population of patients. Here, the authors attempt to address the risk of serious bleeding in East Asian as compared to the other regions of the world. The community-based epidemiological data suggest numerically higher risk of hemorrhage stroke in East Asian as compared to the globe. Importantly, the life-time risk of ischemic stroke in East Asia is higher than that of the globe. Regarding the serious bleeding risk in East Asians with the use of antithrombotic agents, various clinical trials and international registries provided conflicting information. It is hard to draw generalized conclusion, but there are some specific sub-population in East Asian with higher risk of specific serious bleeding events with the use of specific antithrombotic agents such as the risk of intra-cranial bleeding (ICH) with Vitamin K antagonists. Specific characteristics in East Asian such as higher prevalence of lacunar stroke may contribute higher risk of ICH in East Asian, but the detailed mechanism is still to be elucidated. In conclusion, further investigations are necessary to clarify the specific conditions where the risk of serious bleeding events in East Asian patients differ substantially compared to the global. In addition, further understanding of the mechanisms causing the different bleeding response in specific conditions in East Asian is awaited.

Stroke Disparities: From Observations to Actions: Inaugural Edward J. Kenton Lecture 2020.

Numerous epidemiological studies have demonstrated stroke disparities across race and ethnic groups. The goal of the NOMAS (Northern Manhattan Study) was to evaluate race and ethnic differences in stroke within a community with 3 different race-ethnic groups. Starting as a population-based incidence and case-control study, the study evolved into a cohort study. Results from NOMAS have demonstrated differences in stroke incidence, subtypes, risk factors, and outcomes. Disparities in ideal cardiovascular health can help explain many differences in stroke incidence and call for tailored risk factor modification through innovative portals to shift more diverse subjects to ideal cardiovascular health. The results of NOMAS and multiple other studies have provided foundational data to support interventions. Conceptual models to address health disparities have called for moving from detecting disparities in disease incidence, to determining the underlying causes of disparities and developing interventions, and then to testing interventions in human populations. Further actions to address race and ethnic stroke disparities are needed including innovative risk factor interventions, stroke awareness campaigns, quality improvement programs, workforce diversification, and accelerating policy changes.