Oral octreotide capsules for acromegaly treatment: application of clinical trial insights to real-world use.

INTRODUCTION: Acromegaly is a rare endocrine disorder usually caused by a benign growth hormone‒secreting pituitary adenoma. Surgical adenoma resection is typically the first line of treatment, and medical therapy is used for patients with persistent disease following surgery, for adenoma recurrence, or for patients ineligible for, or declining, surgery. Approved somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) have been limited to injectable options, until recently. Oral octreotide capsules (OOC) are the first approved oral SRL for patients with acromegaly. AREAS COVERED: We review published reports and provide case study examples demonstrating practical considerations on the use of OOC. Using two hypothetical case scenarios, we discuss current treatment patterns, breakthrough symptoms and quality of life (QoL), efficacy of SRLs, OOC dose titration, evaluation of OOC treatment response, and incidence and management of adverse events. EXPERT OPINION: OOC are an option for patients with acromegaly including those who experience breakthrough symptoms, who have preference for oral therapies, or other reasons for declining injectable SRLs. OOC have been associated with improved patient-reported QoL measures compared with those reported for lanreotide and octreotide. Continued real-world experience will determine whether OOC, alone or in combination with other therapies, provides further advantages over current injectable acromegaly treatments.

Bone health and skeletal fragility in second- and third-line medical therapies for acromegaly: preliminary results from a pilot single center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Skeletal fragility is a clinically relevant and not-reversible complication of acromegaly, involving around 30-40% of patients since the disease diagnosis. Few studies have investigated the effects on skeletal health of medical therapies for acromegaly. In this retrospective longitudinal monocentre study, we investigated the outcome of skeletal fragility in patients treated with Pasireotide Lar in combination with Pegvisomant (Pasi-Lar + Peg-V), also comparing those observed in patients treated with conventional therapies. RESULTS: We included 6 patients treated with Pasi-Lar + Peg-V, 5 patients treated with Peg-V in monotherapy (m-Peg-V), 16 patients treated with Peg-V plus first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRLs + Peg-V), 9 patients treated with Pasi-Lar. None of the patients treated with Pasi-Lar + Peg-V experienced worsening of spine and femoral bone mineral density (BMD) and incident vertebral fractures (i-VFs). Eight patients experienced i-VFs. The frequency of i-VFs was significantly lower in patients treated with the Pasi-Lar + Peg-V (0/8; 0%), as compared to those observed in m-Peg-V treated patients (4/8; 50%, p = 0.02). The frequency of i-VFs was slightly but not significantly higher in Pasi-Lar treated patients (1/8; 12.5% p = 0.6) and in fg-SRLs + Peg-V treated patients (3/8; 37.5% p = 0.364), concerning those treated with Pasi-Lar + Peg-V (0/8; 0%). I-VFs occurred more frequently in patients with higher GH levels at acromegaly diagnosis (p < 0.001), and in patients who experienced a BMD worsening (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Our preliminary data suggested that in conventional and multi-drug resistant acromegaly, the combination therapy Pasi-Lar + Peg-V may prevent the worsening of BMD and the occurrence of i-VFs. Prospective and translational studies should further validate these results and ascertain underlying physiopathology mechanisms.

Effectiveness of combined first-line medical treatment in acromegaly with prolactin cosecretion.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the response to first-line medical treatment in treatment-naive acromegaly patients with pure growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenoma (GH-PA) and those with GH and prolactin cosecreting PA (GH&PRL-PA). DESIGN: This is a retrospective multicentric study of acromegaly patients followed from 2003 to 2023 in 33 tertiary Spanish hospitals with at least 6 months of first-line medical treatment. METHODS: Baseline characteristics, first-line medical treatment strategies, and outcomes were analyzed. We employed a multiple logistic regression full model to estimate the impact of some baseline characteristics on disease control after each treatment modality. RESULTS: Of the 144 patients included, 72.9% had a GH-PA, and 27.1% had a GH&PRL-PA. Patients with GH&PRL-PA were younger (43.9 ± 15.0 vs 51.9 ± 12.7 years, P < .01) and harboring more frequently macroadenomas (89.7% vs 72.1%, P = .03). First-generation somatostatin receptor ligand (fgSRL) as monotherapy was given to 106 (73.6%) and a combination treatment with fgSRL and cabergoline in the remaining 38 (26.4%). Patients with GH&PRL-PA received more frequently a combination therapy (56.4% vs 15.2%, P < .01). After 6 months of treatment, in the group of patients under fgSRL as monotherapy, those patients with GH&PRL-PA had worse control compared to GH-PAs (29.4% vs 55.1%, P = .04). However, these differences in the rate of disease control between both groups disappeared when both received combination treatment with fgSRL and cabergoline. CONCLUSION: In GH&PRL-PA, the biochemical control achieved with fgSRL as monotherapy is substantially worse than in patients harboring GH-PA, supporting the inclusion of cabergoline as first-line medical treatment in combination with fgSRLs in these subgroups of patients.

Pegvisomant and pasireotide in PRL and GH co-secreting vs GH-secreting Pit-NETs.

The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of second-line therapies in patients with acromegaly caused by a growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL) co-secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (GH&PRL-Pit-NET) compared to their efficacy in patients with acromegaly caused by a GH-secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (GH-Pit-NET). This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients with acromegaly on treatment with pasireotide and/or pegvisomant. Patients were classified in two groups: GH&PRL-Pit-NETs when evidence of hyperprolactinemia and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for GH and PRL was positive or if PRL were >200 ng/dL regardless of the PRL-IHC and GH-Pit-NETs when the previously mentioned criteria were not met. A total of 28 cases with GH&PRL-Pit-NETs and 122 with GH-Pit-NETs met the inclusion criteria. GH&PRL-Pit-NETs presented at a younger age, caused hypopituitarism, and were invasive more frequently than GH-Pit-NETs. There were 124 patients treated with pegvisomant and 49 with pasireotide at any time. The efficacy of pegvisomant for IGF-1 normalization was of 81.5% and of pasireotide of 71.4%. No differences in IGF-1 control with pasireotide and with pegvisomant were observed between GH&PRL-Pit-NETs and GH-Pit-NETs. All GH&PRL-Pit-NET cases treated with pasireotide (n = 6) and 82.6% (n = 19/23) of the cases treated with pegvisomant normalized PRL levels. No differences in the rate of IGF-1 control between pegvisomant and pasireotide were detected in patients with GH&PRL-Pit-NETs (84.9% vs 66.7%, P = 0.178). We conclude that despite the more aggressive behavior of GH&PRL-Pit-NETs than GH-Pit-NETs, no differences in the rate of IGF-1 control with pegvisomant and pasireotide were observed between both groups, and both drugs have shown to be effective treatments to control IGF-1 and PRL hypersecretion in these tumors.

Predictive factors and the management of hyperglycemia in patients with acromegaly and Cushing's disease receiving pasireotide treatment: post hoc analyses from the SOM230B2219 study.

Introduction: Pasireotide, a somatostatin receptor ligand, is approved for treating acromegaly and Cushing's disease (CD). Hyperglycemia during treatment can occur because of the drug's mechanism of action, although treatment discontinuation is rarely required. The prospective, randomized, Phase IV SOM230B2219 (NCT02060383) trial was designed to assess optimal management of pasireotide-associated hyperglycemia. Here, we investigated predictive factors for requiring antihyperglycemic medication during pasireotide treatment. Methods: Participants with acromegaly or CD initiated long-acting pasireotide 40 mg/28 days intramuscularly (acromegaly) or pasireotide 600 µg subcutaneously twice daily during pre-randomization (≤16 weeks). Those who did not need antihyperglycemic medication, were managed with metformin, or received insulin from baseline entered an observational arm ending at 16 weeks. Those who required additional/alternative antihyperglycemic medication to metformin were randomized to incretin-based therapy or insulin for an additional 16 weeks. Logistic-regression analyses evaluated quantitative and qualitative factors for requiring antihyperglycemic medication during pre-randomization. Results: Of 190 participants with acromegaly and 59 with CD, 88 and 15, respectively, did not need antihyperglycemic medication; most were aged <40 years (acromegaly 62.5%, CD 86.7%), with baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) <6.5% (<48 mmol/mol; acromegaly 98.9%, CD 100%) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) <100 mg/dL (<5.6 mmol/L; acromegaly 76.1%, CD 100%). By logistic regression, increasing baseline HbA1c (odds ratio [OR] 3.6; P=0.0162) and FPG (OR 1.0; P=0.0472) and history of diabetes/pre-diabetes (OR 3.0; P=0.0221) predicted receipt of antihyperglycemic medication in acromegaly participants; increasing baseline HbA1c (OR 12.6; P=0.0276) was also predictive in CD participants. Investigator-reported hyperglycemia-related adverse events were recorded in 47.9% and 54.2% of acromegaly and CD participants, respectively, mainly those with diabetes/pre-diabetes. Conclusion: Increasing age, HbA1c, and FPG and pre-diabetes/diabetes were associated with increased likelihood of requiring antihyperglycemic medication during pasireotide treatment. These risk factors may be used to identify those who need more vigilant monitoring to optimize outcomes during pasireotide treatment.

Investigational drugs for the treatment of acromegaly: new agents to transform therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Disease control is essential to decrease morbidity burden and mortality in acromegaly patients. In the last decades, the availability of new drugs increased the rate of disease control. However, up to 55% of patients remain uncontrolled despite available treatment strategies in real-world data. The reasons for this finding may include poor adherence, inadequate tolerability, therapeutic inertia, and high costs. Since acromegaly is a chronic disease and medical therapy is usually life-long, patient's adherence to treatment is fundamental in both achieving and maintaining disease control. Less invasive routes of administration could improve adherence and concur to increase disease control rate. AREAS COVERED: The aim of current review is to provide a detailed update about investigational drugs for acromegaly treatment currently under investigation as paltusotine, ONO-5788, AP102, GT-02037, ISIS 766720, CAM2024, Lanreotide PRF, DP1038, MTD201, solid dose injection of octreotide. EXPERT OPINION: Medical therapy of acromegaly is an evolving field. Current studies are addressing patient's need for both new molecules and less invasive routes of administration for already existing drugs. It cannot be ruled out that drugs currently used for other diseases such as cancer could be considered in the future for the treatment of acromegaly.

A Potent Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibody to Human Growth Hormone Suppresses Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 in Female Rats.

Acromegaly and gigantism are disorders caused by hypersecretion of growth hormone (GH), usually from pituitary adenomas. Although somatostatin analogues (SSA), dopamine agonists, and GH receptor antagonists are important therapeutic agents, all of these have issues with their effectiveness, safety, and/or convenience of use. To overcome these, we developed a GH-specific potent neutralizing a mouse monoclonal antibody (mAb) named 13H02. 13H02 selectively bound both to human and monkey GH with high affinity, and strongly inhibited the biological activity of GH in the Nb2 rat lymphoma cell proliferation assay. In hypophysectomized/GH-supplemented rats, a single subcutaneous administration of 13H02 significantly and dose-dependently lowered the serum insulin-like growth factor-1 levels. To pursue the therapeutic potential of this antibody for acromegaly and gigantism, we humanized 13H02 to reduce its immunogenicity and applied a single amino acid mutation in the Fc region to extend its serum half-life. The resulting antibody, Hu-13H02m, also showed GH-specific neutralizing activity, similar to the parental 13H02, and showed improved binding affinity to human FcRn.

Immunological signatures and predictive biomarkers for first-generation somatostatin receptor ligand resistance in Acromegaly.

PURPOSE: Predicting resistance to first-generation Somatostatin Receptor Ligands (fg-SRL) in Acromegaly patients remains an ongong challenge. Tumor-associated immune components participate in various pathological processes, including drug-resistance. We aimed to identify the immune components involved in resistance of fg-SRL, and to investigate biomarkers that can be targeted to treat those drug-resistant Acromegaly. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study involving 35 Acromegaly patients with somatotropinomas treated postoperatively with fg-SRL. Gathering clinicopathological data, SSTR2 expression, and immunological profiles, we utilized univariate, binary logistic regression, and ROC analyses to assess their predictive roles in fg-SRL resistance. Spearman correlation analysis further examined interactions among interested characteristics. RESULTS: 19 patients (54.29%) exhibited resistance to postoperative fg-SRL. GH level at diagnosis, preoperative tumor volume, T2WI-MRI intensity, granularity, PD-L1, SSTR2, and CD8 + T cell infiltration showed association with clinical outcomes of fg-SRL. Notably, T2WI-MRI hyperintensity, PD-L1-IRS > 7, CD8 + T cell infiltration < 14.8/HPF, and SSTR2-IRS < 5.4 emerged as reliable predictors for fg-SRL resistance. Correlation analysis highlighted a negative relationship between PD-L1 expression and CD8 + T cell infiltration, while showcasing a positive correlation with preoperative tumor volume of somatotropinomas. Additionally, 5 patients with fg-SRL resistance underwent re-operation were involved. Following fg-SRL treatment, significant increases in PD-L1 and SSTR5 expression were observed, while SSTR2 expression decreased in somatotropinoma. CONCLUSION: PD-L1 expression and CD8 + T cell infiltration, either independently or combined with SSTR2 expression and T2WI-MRI intensity, could form a predictive model guiding clinical decisions on fg-SRL employment. Furthermore, targeting PD-L1 through immunotherapy and embracing second-generations of SRL with higher affinity to SSTR5 represent promising strategies to tackle fg-SRL resistance in somatotropinomas.

Management of pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia in patients with acromegaly: An experts' consensus statement.

Pasireotide is a somatostatin analogue for the treatment of acromegaly, a chronic condition caused by excess growth hormone. Despite the therapeutic benefits of pasireotide as a second-line treatment for inadequately controlled acromegaly, a major concern is its hyperglycemic side-effect. Here, we provide guidance on how to select appropriate patients with acromegaly for treatment with pasireotide. We summarize baseline characteristics of patients at high risk for pasireotide-associated hyperglycemia and recommend a monitoring strategy based on the risk profile. Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels (SMBG), measurements of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) and regular HbA1c measurements are the foundation of our proposed monitoring approach. The pathophysiology of pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia involves decreased secretion of the incretin hormones GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) and GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1). Our expert recommendations address the specific pathophysiology of pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia by recommending the incretin-based therapeutics dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) in all appropriate patients as an alternative to first-line monotherapy with metformin. Furthermore, we emphasize the importance of adequate control of acromegaly, excellent diabetes education, nutrition and lifestyle guidance and advise to consult expert diabetologists in case of uncertainty in the management of patients with hyperglycemia under pasireotide.

Long-term depot specific changes in adipose tissue after treatment of acromegaly.

CONTEXT: Patients with active acromegaly present a decreased adipose tissue (AT) mass, and short-term studies show that treatment leads to AT depot-specific gain. However, it remains unclear if the increase is persistent in the long-term perspective and/or is sex-dependent. DESIGN: To characterize the depot-specific changes of AT after treatment of acromegaly and identify contributing factors. METHODS: Adipose tissue, including visceral (VAT), subcutaneous (SAT), and total (TAT), and android to gynoid ratio (A/G ratio) were measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at diagnosis (n = 62), and after treatment at short-term (median (IQR) 1.9 (1.5-2.3)) and long-term 5.5 (3.9-9.5) years, and correlated to clinical and biochemical measurements. Growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), glucose and HbA1c levels, gonadal status, and the presence of diabetes mellitus were recorded. Remission status was assessed at the long-term visit (IGF-1/ULN ≤ 1.3). Differences in the temporal course of AT from baseline to short- and long-term follow-up according to sex, diabetes, gonadal, and remission status were evaluated by mixed model analysis, adjusted for age. RESULTS: Despite a stable body mass index, VAT and A/G ratio increased at both time points, whereas SAT mainly increased at short-term, plateauing afterwards (P < .05 for all). Visceral adipose tissue and A/G ratio were higher in men (P = .035 and P < .001), and the A/G ratio increased more than in women (P = .003). Glucose and HbA1c decreased short-term (P < .05) and remained stable at long-term. The increase in AT depots correlated with the decrease of disease activity at long-term. Remission status had no effect on changes in AT mass during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Treatment of acromegaly leads to an increase in AT mass in a depot- and sex-specific manner both at short-term and long-term follow-up. Glucose metabolism improves rapidly after disease control and persists.

Preferences for different treatment options among people living with acromegaly in the US.

OBJECTIVE: Acromegaly is a rare hormonal disorder that results in enlargement of the face, hands and feet. It is associated with comorbidities, increased mortality, reduced quality of life and economic burden. Adequate treatment is critical to alleviate symptoms; however, the treatment burden is substantial. To understand how different treatment aspects might ease the burden, this study investigated preferences for treatment options among people with acromegaly in the US, using a choice experiment (CE). METHODS: An online CE was conducted based on a similar study among the US general population. Respondents were recruited through Acromegaly Community in the US, and all eligible respondents were included. The survey assessed six treatment options that varied according to administration, frequency, storage, treatment setting, needle type and injection pain. RESULTS: 109 adults with acromegaly completed the survey between October and December 2022. On average, the population had lived with symptoms for 15 years, while the average number of years with the diagnosis was eight. Respondents preferred subcutaneous injections every fourth week and preferred them at home rather than at the hospital. Most respondents preferred subcutaneous injections right under the skin administered once every fourth week with a pen at home over oral capsules administered twice daily at home. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that new treatment options administered as subcutaneous injections right under the skin once every fourth week at home have the potential to lower the treatment burden among people with acromegaly, emphasizing the importance of taking each person's preference into consideration when choosing treatment.

The Effect of Metformin Treatment on Disease Control in Patients with Acromegaly.

BACKGROUND: The increase in portal insulin levels has been shown to upregulate growth hormone receptor expression in the liver, leading to increased insulin-like growth hormone- 1 levels. Metformin inhibits hepatic gluconeogenesis and reduces fasting insulin. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the effect of metformin treatment in patients with acromegaly on growth hormone, insulin-like growth hormone-1, and pituitary adenoma size. METHODS: Patients who were followed up with the diagnosis of acromegaly in Istanbul University- Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty were evaluated. The patients were divided into three groups after pituitary adenectomy as those who received somatostatin receptor ligand and metformin treatment (group A), somatostatin receptor ligand treatment only (group B), and those who received metformin treatment only (group C). Groups A and B were compared with each other, and patients in group C were compared among themselves. RESULTS: While the median insulin-like growth factor-1 level decreased to 170 ng/ml in Group A after the treatment, the median insulin-like growth factor-1 level decreased to 229 ng/ml in Group B, and a statistically significant difference was found between the two groups (p =0.020). There was no significant difference in post-treatment growth hormone levels and residual adenoma sizes between groups A and B (p >0.005). In group C, there was no significant difference in growth hormone values pre-and post-metformin treatment (p =0.078); however, the median insulin-like growth factor-1 level decreased from 205 ng/ml to 168 ng/ml during metformin treatment and was found to be statistically significant (p =0.027). CONCLUSION: Due to the effect of metformin treatment on insulin-like growth factor-1 values in patients with acromegaly, it can be used in disease control, as well as diabetes treatment.

Efficacy of pasireotide LAR for acromegaly: a prolonged real-world monocentric study.

Background: Acromegaly is caused by excessive growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1). Medical therapy plays a role as a treatment option for persistent disease after non-curative surgery or as a first-line therapy when surgery is not feasible. Pasireotide-LAR (Pas-LAR) is recommended for patients with acromegaly as second-line treatment. Aim: To evaluate the patients characteristics predictive of an adequate response to Pas-LAR and the long-term efficacy and safety of the Pas-LAR treatment. Methods: Data from 19 patients with active acromegaly, who were and resistant or intolerant to first-line medical therapy and were switched to pas-LAR have been retrospectively collected. We compared the baseline clinical and biochemical characteristics of patients who were found to respond to Pas-LAR therapy (responders, n=14) with those of patients who did not respond (non-responders, n=5). We then evaluated the Pas-LAR efficacy and safety during long-term follow-up in responders. Results: IGF1 normalization occurred in 71.4% of responders after one injection. IGF1 levels, [median(interquartile range) of the upper limit of the normal range (ULN) fold increase] were higher in non-responders compared to responders within the initial month of therapy [1.40(1.30-2.34) vs 0.70(0.55-1.25), respectively, p=0.009] and after three [1.77(1.74-2.29) vs 0.94(0.82-1.13), respectively, p=0.029] and six months [1.68(1.33-1.72) vs 1.00(0.65 -1.28), respectively, p=0.002]. Out of 6 patients with symptomatic headache (all in responder group), 5 and 1 reported the resolution and improvement of headache, respectively, already after the first injection. Median HbA1c levels tended to increase from baseline to 6 months both in responder (36 mMol/Mol to 42 mMol/Mol) and non-responder patients (45 mMol/Mol to 48 mMol/Mol). During long term follow up, in the responder group 2 new patients developed diabetes. Tumor shrinkage was observed in 6 out of 7 evaluated responders, with no cases of size increase during the long-term follow-up. Conclusion: Pas-LAR is effective and safe and the early identification of responders is possible just after the first administration.

Real-life data of Pasireotide LAR in acromegaly: a long-term follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: Pasireotide LAR (PAS-LAR) was released in Italy in 2017 to treat acromegaly patients resistant to SRLs (Somatostatin Receptors Ligands). The long-term follow-up data of PAS-LAR therapy in Italy are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PAS-LAR in acromegaly. DESIGN: Patients with acromegaly in PAS-LAR treatment were enrolled in three tertiary Italian endocrinological centers and evaluated by a retrospective observational real-life multicentre study. METHODS: Patients have been studied before (baseline) and 1, 6, 12, 24 and > 36 months after PAS-LAR start. Clinical, biochemical, and pituitary magnetic resonance data were collected, along with information on adverse events. Acromegaly disease activity was classified according to the IGF-1 index (normal value < 1.0). RESULTS: Fifty patients (female 23) were enrolled. PAS-LAR treatment (mean follow-up 24 ± 16 months) significantly decreased IGF-1 levels (IGF-1 index baseline vs last visit: 1.9 ± 0.6 vs 1.2 ± 0.6, p < 0.0001). At the last visit, 67% of patients had controlled disease, and 44% showed a decrease in tumor volume. Clinical and biochemical efficacy was observed as early as after 1-month of PAS-LAR treatment (IGF-1 index baseline vs 1-month: 1.9 ± 0.6 vs 1.4 ± 0.7, p < 0.0001). Also, 50% of patients referred headache improvement or disappearance. Fifteen patients discontinued PAS-LAR due to failure of treatment and poor glycaemic control. The prevalence of diabetes increased from 33% at the baseline to 54% at the last visit (p = 0.0072). CONCLUSION: In real-life settings, PAS-LAR significantly decreases symptoms, IGF-1 levels, and the size of adenoma in patients with acromegaly resistant to SRLs. Beneficial effects may occur early after the first injection.

Recurrent acromegaly: a systematic review on therapeutic approaches.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Management of recurrent acromegaly is challenging for both neurosurgeons and endocrinologists. Several treatment options including repeat surgery, medical therapy, and radiation are offered for such patients. The efficacy of these modalities for the treatment of recurrence has not been studied previously in the literature. In this study, we aim to systematically review the existing cases of recurrence and come to a conclusion regarding the appropriate treatment in such cases. METHOD: A systematic review was performed through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane database to identify studies reporting the treatment outcome of recurrent acromegaly patients. Using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, the included studies were reviewed for primary and secondary treatment, complications, and outcomes of the secondary treatment. RESULTS: The systematic review retrieved 23 records with 95 cases of recurrent acromegaly. The mean time of recurrence was 4.16 years after the initial treatment. The most common primary treatment was surgery followed by radiotherapy. The remission rate was significantly higher in medical and radiotherapy compared to surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: In cases of recurrent acromegaly, the patient may benefit more from radiotherapy and medical therapy compared to surgery. As the quality of evidence is low on this matter feature studies specifically designed for recurrent patients are needed.

An international simulated-use study to assess nurses' preferences between two lanreotide syringes for patients with neuroendocrine tumours or acromegaly (PRESTO 3).

PURPOSE: PRESTO 3 evaluated nurses' preference for the Somatuline® Autogel® syringe versus the Lanreotide Pharmathen syringe after injection-pad testing. METHODS: This international simulated-use study included oncology/endocrinology nurses with ≥ 1 years' experience in managing neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) and/or acromegaly. Each nurse tested both syringes twice in a randomised order before completing an electronic survey. The primary objective was to assess overall preference (%, 95% confidence interval [CI]) for the Somatuline Autogel syringe versus the Lanreotide Pharmathen syringe. Secondary objectives included rating syringe performance and ranking the importance of syringe attributes. RESULTS: Ninety-four nurses were enrolled: mean age, 41.0 (SD, 11.5) years. The percentage of nurses stating a preference ("strong" or "slight") for the Somatuline Autogel syringe (86.2% [95% CI 77.5-92.4%]) was significantly higher than 50% (p < 0.0001). Performance rating was significantly higher for the Somatuline Autogel syringe versus Lanreotide Pharmathen syringe for 10 of the 11 attributes tested (p < 0.05). The syringe attributes considered most important when injecting patients in routine clinical practice were "easy to use from preparation to injection" (30.9%) and "comfortable to handle during use from preparation to injection" (16.0%). The attribute most commonly rated as least important was "fast administration from preparation to injection" (26.6%). CONCLUSION: Nurses strongly preferred the user experience of the Somatuline Autogel syringe over the Lanreotide Pharmathen syringe. "Ease of use" and "comfortable to handle" were the most important syringe attributes, and performance rating was significantly higher with Somatuline Autogel versus Lanreotide Pharmathen syringe for all but one attribute.

Drugs called somatostatin analogues (SSAs) can be used to treat patients with neuroendocrine tumours or acromegaly over a prolonged period of time. SSAs are given as injections and act by slowing the production of hormones by the body and in some cases reducing the growth of the tumour. To help to provide the best care possible, it is important that the syringe used for the injection is easy to use and delivers the SSA effectively. Somatuline Autogel is a syringe that can be used to inject an SSA called lanreotide. Previous studies showed that patients and nurses preferred the injection experience when using the Somatuline Autogel syringe compared with a syringe used to inject another SSA called octreotide long-acting release. A new syringe used for lanreotide injections has been developed recently by a company called Pharmathen. In the PRESTO 3 study, we compared the user experience of the Somatuline Autogel syringe and the Lanreotide Pharmathen syringe. We asked 94 nurses from Europe and the US to test both syringes, in a randomised order, using injection pads, and then to answer questions about their overall preference between the two syringes and how well the syringe performed for a set of syringe features. Overall, 86% of nurses preferred the Somatuline Autogel syringe over the Lanreotide Pharmathen syringe. Of the 11 features of the syringe that we assessed, 10 were rated higher for the Somatuline Autogel syringe than the Lanreotide Pharmathen syringe. The syringe features "ease of use" and "comfortable to handle" were considered the most important. The results of the PRESTO 3 study indicated that there is a difference in the user experience between the syringes, particularly for confidence and ease of use, and that it is important to offer syringe choices to nurses who are using SSA injections to treat patients.

Biomarkers of response to treatment in acromegaly.

INTRODUCTION: Medical treatment of acromegaly is based in a `trial and error` approach. First-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRL) are prescribed as first-line medical therapy to the vast majority of patients, despite lack of disease control in approximately 60% of patients. However, other drugs used in acromegaly treatment are available (cabergoline, pasireotide and pegvisomant). AREAS COVERED: In this article, we review and discuss the biomarkers of response to medical treatment in acromegaly. EXPERT OPINION: Biomarkers for fg-SRL that can already be applied in clinical practice are: gender, age, pretreatment GH and IGF-I levels, cytokeratin granulation pattern, and the expression of somatostatin receptor type 2. Using biomarkers of response could guide treatment towards precision medicine with greater efficacy and lower costs.

Correlation between tumor invasion and somatostatin receptor subtypes in acromegaly.

OBJECTIVE: The low expression of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) subtypes in somatotropinoma is associated with a poor response to somatostatin analogs (SSAs). However, the correlation between SSTRs and tumor invasion has not yet been clarified. Therefore, the authors aimed to investigate the relationship between SSTRs and tumor invasion, as well as the correlation between tumor invasiveness and pharmacological response to SSAs. METHODS: A total of 102 patients with acromegaly who underwent surgery between December 2016 and December 2021 at the largest pituitary tumor surgery center in southern China were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into the noninvasive tumor group (Knosp grades 0-2 and Hardy-Wilson grade I or II) and invasive group (either Knosp grade 3 or 4 or Hardy-Wilson grade III or IV). The positive response to SSAs was defined by the following criteria after at least 3 months of SSA treatment: 1) ≥ 50% reduction or age- and sex-adjusted normal range of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) level; 2) ≥ 80% reduction in or normal range of growth hormone (GH) level; or 3) > 20% reduction in tumor volume. The reference for the normal range of age- and sex-adjusted serum IGF-1 levels was derived from a survey of 2791 healthy adults (1339 males and 1452 females) in China. Demographics and clinical characteristics including tumor size, biochemical assessment, expression levels of SSTRs, and response to preoperative SSAs were compared between the invasive group and noninvasive group. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the association between SSTR2 and tumor invasion. RESULTS: Compared with the noninvasive group, the invasive group presented with a larger tumor size (9.99 ± 10.41 cm3 vs 3.50 ± 4.02 cm3, p < 0.001), relatively lower SSTR2 expression (p < 0.001), and poorer response to SSAs (36.4% vs 91.7%, p < 0.001). In addition, there was a significant negative correlation between SSTR2 mRNA level and tumor size (r = -0.214, p = 0.031). However, there were no statistically significant differences in the expression of SSTR1, SSTR3, and SSTR5 between the groups. ROC analysis revealed that the low SSTR2 mRNA level was closely associated with tumor invasion (area under the curve 0.805, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor invasion is negatively correlated with SSTR2 level but is not associated with other SSTR subtypes. Patients with invasive tumors have a poorer response to SSA therapy, which may be due to the low level of SSTR2 expression. Therefore, SSTR2 could be considered as a routine investigative marker for aiding management of postoperative residual tumors.

Pasireotide effects on biochemical control and glycometabolic profile in acromegaly patients switched from combination therapies or unconventional dosages of somatostatin analogs.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of pasireotide (PAS) therapy on hormonal and glycometabolic outcome in patients with acromegaly previously treated with combination medical therapies or unconventional dosages of first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRLs). METHODS: Retrospective study carried out in two referral centers for pituitary diseases. Twenty-one acromegalic patients were switched to PAS (12 had biochemical control, 9 were uncontrolled). Data were collected after 3- and 6-months PAS treatment, and at the last available visit (median 35 months). RESULTS: After switching to PAS therapy, a significant reduction in IGF-1 values was observed [median 39%; 0.79 xULN (IQR 0.5-1.01) vs 1.29 xULN (IQR 1.06-1.83); p = 0.009]. IGF-1 reduction was statistically significant in the 9 patients previously uncontrolled (61%, p = 0.016), and in the 12 controlled subjects (33%, p = 0.037). At last follow-up, the number of patients reaching an acceptable biochemical control (IGF-1 < 1.3 xULN) raised from 57 to 90% (p = 0.032). Mean HbA1c levels increased from 5.7% (5.5-5.9) to 6.0% (5.9-7) (p = 0.002), and the percentage of diabetic patients raised from 14% (3/21) to 67% (14/21) (p = 0.004). At the last evaluation HbA1c was ≥ 7.0% in 5 patients (24%). Antidiabetic drugs were initiated in 9 new patients, and in 7 out of 9 metformin alone was effective. Younger age and male sex were predictors for the maintenance of glucose homeostasis. CONCLUSION: PAS monotherapy can be effective in acromegalic patients previously treated with combination medical therapies or unconventional dosages of fg-SRLs. Glucose imbalance can be managed in the vast majority of cases by use of lifestyle interventions and metformin.

A novel somatostatin receptor ligand for human ACTH - and GH -secreting pituitary adenomas.

OBJECTIVE: Somatostatin receptor ligands have come to play a pivotal role in the treatment of both ACTH- and GH-secreting pituitary adenomas. Clinical efficacy averages 30-50%, thus a considerable number of patients with Cushing's disease or acromegaly remain unresponsive to this therapeutic approach. HTL0030310 is a new somatostatin receptor ligand selective for subtype 5 over subtype 2, thus with a different receptor profile compared to clinical somatostatin receptor ligands. DESIGN: Assessment of the effect of HTL0030310 on hormone secretion in human ACTH- and GH-secreting pituitary adenomas in vitro. METHODS: Primary cultures from 3 ACTH-secreting and 5 GH-secreting pituitary adenomas were treated with 1, 10 and 100 nM HTL0030310 alone or with 10 nM CRH or GHRH, respectively. Parallel incubations with 10 nM pasireotide were also carried out. ACTH and GH secretion were assessed after 4 and 24 hour incubation; SSTR2, SSTR3, SSTR5, GH and POMC expression were evaluated after 24 hours. RESULTS: HTL0030310 reduced unchallenged ACTH and POMC levels up to 50% in 2 ACTH-secreting adenomas and blunted CRH-stimulated ACTH/POMC by 20-70% in all 3 specimens. A reduction in spontaneous GH secretion was observed in 4 GH-secreting adenomas and in 2 specimens during GHRH co-incubation. SSTRs expression was detected in all specimens. CONCLUSIONS: This first study on a novel somatostatin receptor 5-preferring ligand indicates that HTL0030310 can inhibit hormonal secretion in human ACTH- and GH-secreting pituitary adenomas. These findings suggest a potential new avenue for somatostatin ligands in the treatment of Cushing's disease and acromegaly.