Pericardial hydatid cysts presenting with atrial flutter and mitral regurgitation.

Despite being a rare phenomenon, pericardial hydatid cysts present unique diagnostic challenges and require a multimodality imaging as well as a multidisciplinary approach for a curative management. The authors here present a case of a middle aged man who was referred to them for management of new onset atrial flutter with mitral regurgitation.

A stroke patient with an unusual electrocardiogram.

We present a case of a 70 year old man with a history of paroxysmal atrial flutter who was admitted to the hospital with symptoms and imaging consistent with an acute stroke. Physical exam was notable for a pulse rate of 50 beats per minute and right sided facial droop with mild dysarthria. Admission ECG shows a junctional bradycardia with evidence of dual AV node physiology, rarely manifested in a retrograde fashion on a standard ECG. The patient likely experienced parasympathetic sinus node slowing in the setting of acute stroke. During post-stroke monitoring, the patient demonstrated return of sinus rhythm with chronotropic competence and he had no additional arrhythmia during admission.

A Case of Cardioversion and Management of Atrial Flutter in the Emergency Department.

Atrial flutter is a supraventricular cardiac arrhythmia commonly characterized by two or three rapid atrial contractions for every ventricular contraction and a rapid ventricular rate that can be identified by a sawtooth pattern on an electrocardiogram. Patients often present with symptoms of heart failure and face the risk of atrial thrombus with a potential for systemic embolization. As such, pharmacologic rate and rhythm control, transesophageal echocardiogram, direct current cardioversion, and anticoagulation therapies may all be required for patient management. This case study provides an example of the patient presentation, exam findings, diagnostic results, and intervention modalities required for the health care provider to manage atrial flutter correctly in the emergency department setting.

The burden of atrial fibrillation/flutter in the Middle East and North Africa region and its associated risk factors from 1990 to 2019.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation and flutter (AFF) are the most common cardiac arrhythmias globally, contributing to substantial morbidity and mortality. The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region face unique challenges in managing cardiovascular diseases, including AFF, due to diverse sociodemographic factors and healthcare infrastructure variability. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the burden of AFF in MENA from 1990 to 2019. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2019, a comprehensive source incorporating diverse data inputs. The study collected global, regional, and national Age-Standardized Incidence Rate (ASIR), Age-Standardized Mortality Rate (ASMR), and Age-Standardized Disability-Adjusted Rate (ASDR), Mortality across sex, age groups, and years. LOESS regression was employed to determine the relationship between age-standardized rates attributed to AFF and Socio-Demographic Index (SDI). RESULTS: The study found minimal change in ASIR of AFF in MENA from 1990 to 2019, with a slight increase observed in ASMR and ASDR during the same period. Notably, AFF burden was consistently higher in females compared to males, with age showing a direct positive relationship with AFF burden. Iraq, Iran, and Turkey exhibited the highest ASIR, while Qatar, Bahrain, and Oman had the highest ASMR and ASDR in 2019. Conversely, Kuwait, Libya, and Turkey displayed the lowest ASMR and ASDR rates. CONCLUSION: This study underscores the persistent burden of AFF in MENA and identifies significant disparities across countries. High systolic blood pressure emerged as a prominent risk factor for mortality in AFF patients. Findings provide crucial insights for policy-making efforts, resource allocation, and intervention strategies aimed at reducing the burden of cardiovascular diseases in the MENA region.

A novel approach to terminate roof-dependent atrial flutter with epicardial conduction through septopulmonary bundle.

Atrial flutter, a prevalent cardiac arrhythmia, is primarily characterized by reentrant circuits in the right atrium. However, atypical forms of atrial flutter present distinct challenges in terms of diagnosis and treatment. In this study, we examine three noteworthy clinical cases of atypical atrial flutter, which offer compelling evidence indicating the implication of the lesser-known Septopulmonary Bundle (SPB). This inference is based on the identification of distinct electrocardiographic patterns observed in these patients and their favorable response to catheter ablation, which is a standard treatment for atrial flutter. Remarkably, in each case, targeted ablation at the anterior portion of the left atrial roof effectively terminated the arrhythmia, thus providing further support for the hypothesis of SPB involvement. These insightful observations shed light on the potential significance of the SPB in the etiology of atypical atrial flutter and introduce a promising therapeutic target. We anticipate that this paper will stimulate further exploration into the role of the SPB in atrial flutter and pave the way for the development of targeted ablation strategies.

Genomic analysis of an Ecuadorian individual carrying an SCN5A rare variant.

BACKGROUND: Ion channels, vital transmembrane protein complexes, regulate ion movement within cells. Germline variants in channel-encoding genes lead to channelopathies. The sodium channels in cardiac cells exhibit a structure of an alpha subunit and one to two beta subunits. The alpha subunit, encoded by the SCN5A gene, comprises four domains. CASE PRESENTATION: A fifteen-year-old Ecuadorian female with atrial flutter and abnormal sinus rhythm with no familial history of cardiovascular disease underwent NGS with the TruSight Cardio kit (Illumina). A likely pathogenic SCN5A gene variant (NM_188056.2:c.2677 C > Tp. Arg893Cys) was identified, associated with arrhythmias, long QT, atrial fibrillation, and Brugada syndrome. Ancestral analysis revealed a predominant European component (43.9%), followed by Native American (35.7%) and African (20.4%) components. CONCLUSIONS: The participant presents atrial flutter and conduction disorders, despite lacking typical cardiovascular risk factors. The proband carries a SCN5A variant that has not been previously reported in Latin America and may be associated to her phenotype. The documented arginine-to-cysteine substitution at position 893 in the protein is crucial for various cellular functions. The subject's mixed genetic composition highlights potential genetic contributors to atrial flutter, emphasizing the need for comprehensive genetic studies, particularly in mixed populations like Ecuadorians. This case underscores the importance of genetic analysis for personalized treatment and the significance of studying diverse genetic backgrounds in understanding cardiovascular diseases.

Association Between Family History and Early-Onset Atrial Flutter Across Racial and Ethnic Groups.

BACKGROUND: Genetic and familial contributions to early-onset atrial fibrillation are described primarily in individuals of European ancestry. However, the role of racial and familial contributions in the pathogenesis of early-onset atrial flutter (EOAFL) is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this cross-sectional study, participants were enrolled prospectively from 2015 to 2021 in multiple academic centers with a diagnosis of atrial flutter (AFL) confirmed by ECG. EOAFL was defined as a diagnosis of AFL before age 66 years with no concomitant or previous diagnosis of atrial tachyarrhythmias. Family history was adjudicated through baseline questionnaires and direct family interviews about the diagnosis of atrial tachyarrhythmias, stroke, and cardiomyopathy. The primary exposure was a positive family history in first-degree relatives, and the primary outcome was the odds of EOAFL versus late-onset AFL. A total of 909 patients were enrolled. Participants with a positive family history of atrial tachyarrhythmias were younger, less likely to be of Black race, and more likely to have EOAFL. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for EOAFL in those with a positive family history was 1.8 (95% CI, 1.1-3.0). There was an increased odds of EOAFL in those of Black race (OR, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.4-3.2]), alcohol use (OR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.0-2.6]), and obstructive sleep apnea (OR, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.0-3.4]). Use of cardioselective ß blockers or calcium channel blockers before the diagnosis of AFL were associated with a lower odds of EOAFL (OR, 0.5 [95% CI, 0.2-0.9]). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a potentially hereditary predisposition to EOAFL across race and ethnicity, warranting further study of the genetic contributions to AFL.

Comparison of anterior mitral line and mitral isthmus line for ablation of mitral annular flutter.

BACKGROUND: Mitral annular flutter (MAF) is the most common left atrial macro-reentrant arrhythmia following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The best ablation approach for this arrhythmia remains unclear. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study sought to compare the acute and long-term outcomes of patients with MAF treated with an anterior mitral line (AML) versus a mitral isthmus line (MIL). Acute ablation success, complication rates, and long-term arrhythmia recurrence were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2021, a total of 81 patients underwent ablation of MAF (58 with an AML and 23 with a MIL). Acute procedural success defined as bidirectional block was achieved in 88% of the AML and 91% of the MIL patients respectively (p = 1.0). One year freedom from atrial arrhythmias was 49.5% versus 77.5% and at 4 years was 24% versus 59.6% for AML versus MIL, respectively (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.38, confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.82, p = .009). Fewer patients in the MIL group had recurrent atrial flutter when compared to the AML group (HR: 0.32, CI: 0.12-0.83, p = .009). The incidence of recurrent AF, on the other side, was not different between both groups (21.7% vs. 18.9%; p = .76). There were no serious adverse events in either group. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study of patients with MAF, a MIL compared to AML was associated with a long-term reduction in recurrent atrial arrhythmias driven by a reduction in macroreentrant atrial flutters.

Development and validation of the Atri-Risk Conduction Index risk score to predict risk of atrial fibrillation after typical atrial flutter ablation.

BACKGROUND: Identification of patients at risk for atrial fibrillation (AF) after typical atrial flutter (tAFL) ablation is important to guide monitoring and treatment. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to create and validate a risk score to predict AF after tAFL ablation METHODS: We identified patients who underwent tAFL ablation with no AF history between 2017 and 2022 and randomly allocated to derivation and validation cohorts. We collected clinical variables and measured conduction parameters in sinus rhythm on an electrophysiology recording system (CardioLab, GE Healthcare). Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions (LogR) were used to evaluate association with AF development. RESULTS: A total of 242 consecutive patients (81% male; mean age 66 ± 11 years) were divided into derivation (n =142) and validation (n = 100) cohorts. Forty-two percent developed AF over median follow-up of 330 days. In multivariate LogR (derivation cohort), proximal to distal coronary sinus time (pCS-dCS) ≥70 ms (odds ratio [OR] 16.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.6-49), pCS time ≥36 ms (OR 4.5; 95% CI 1.5-13), and CHADS2-VASc score ≥3 (OR 4.3; 95% CI 1.6-11.8) were independently associated with new AF during follow-up. The Atri-Risk Conduction Index (ARCI) score was created with 0 as minimal and 4 as high-risk using pCS-dCS ≥70 ms = 2 points; pCS ≥36 ms = 1 point; and CHADS2-VASc score ≥3 = 1 point. In the validation cohort, 0% of patients with ARCI score = 0 developed AF, whereas 89% of patients with ARCI score = 4 developed AF. CONCLUSION: We developed and validated a risk score using atrial conduction parameters and clinical risk factors to predict AF after tAFL ablation. It stratifies low-, moderate-, and high-risk patients and may be helpful in individualizing approaches to AF monitoring and anticoagulation.

Safety and effectiveness of additional left atrial posterior wall ablation using pulsed field ablation for persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation patients.

INTRODUCTION: The unique safety profile of pulsed field ablation (PFA) has made pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) + left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) ablation promising for treating persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF). The goal of this study was to assess long-term freedom from atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, and atrial tachycardia (AF/AFL/AT), as well as the safety and feasibility of LAPW PFA using multipolar, pentaspline Farawave catheter. METHODS: Retrospective observational study at a single institution. Data for 94 patients were collected from a prespecified intraprocedural registry. The long-term AF/AFL/AT recurrence assessment was based on an analysis of medical history; 24-h Holter ECGs at 3, 6, and 12 months postablation; and 12-lead ECGs recorded during symptomatic episodes or visits. RESULTS: Half of the patients had ls-PerAF, and half had a history of catheter ablation-mostly RF PVI. The acute ablation success rate was 100%, and the primary safety outcome was observed in 2 patients. Fifty patients experienced AF/AFL/AT recurrence (54.3%). An increase in LAPW low-voltage areas and AF classification were associated with arrhythmia recurrence. After a median follow-up of 13 months, the Kaplan‒Meier estimated median time free of AF/AFL/AT after a single procedure was 14.7 months. CONCLUSION: PFA PVI + PWA had the best outcome in perAF patients without extensive LA fibrosis. AF recurrence was paroxysmal in significant part of the cohort. The addition of PWA to PVI using multipolar PFA was safe and did not significantly influence the transpired ablation time.

Optimal timing of electrical cardioversion for acute decompensated heart failure caused by atrial arrhythmias: The earlier, the better?

The optimal timing for electrical cardioversion (ECV) in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) with atrial arrhythmias (AAs) is unknown. Here, we retrospectively evaluated the impact of ECV timing on SR maintenance, hospitalization duration, and cardiac function in patients with ADHF and AAs. Between October 2017 and December 2022, ECV was attempted in 73 patients (62 with atrial fibrillation and 11 with atrial flutter). Patients were classified into two groups based on the median number of days from hospitalization to ECV, as follows: early ECV (within 8 days, n = 38) and delayed ECV (9 days or more, n = 35). The primary endpoint was very short-term and short-term ECV failure (unsuccessful cardioversion and AA recurrence during hospitalization and within one month after ECV). Secondary endpoints included (1) acute ECV success, (2) ECVs attempted, (3) periprocedural complications, (4) transthoracic echocardiographic parameter changes within two months following successful ECV, and (5) hospitalization duration. ECV successfully restored SR in 62 of 73 patients (85%), with 10 (14%) requiring multiple ECV attempts (≥ 3), and periprocedural complications occurring in six (8%). Very short-term and short-term ECV failure occurred without between-group differences (51% vs. 63%, P = 0.87 and 61% vs. 72%, P = 0.43, respectively). Among 37 patients who underwent echocardiography before and after ECV success, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) significantly increased (38% [31-52] to 51% [39-63], P = 0.008) between admission and follow-up. Additionally, hospital stay length was shorter in the early ECV group than in the delayed ECV group (14 days [12-21] vs. 17 days [15-26], P < 0.001). Hospital stay duration was also correlated with days from admission to ECV (Spearman's ρ = 0.47, P < 0.001). In clinical practice, early ECV was associated with a shortened hospitalization duration and significantly increased LVEF in patients with ADHF and AAs.

Validation of a novel smartphone-based photoplethysmographic method for ambulatory heart rhythm diagnostics: the SMARTBEATS study.

AIMS: In the current guidelines, smartphone photoplethysmography (PPG) is not recommended for diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF), without a confirmatory electrocardiogram (ECG) recording. Previous validation studies have been performed under supervision in healthcare settings, with limited generalizability of the results. We aim to investigate the diagnostic performance of a smartphone-PPG method in a real-world setting, with ambulatory unsupervised smartphone-PPG recordings, compared with simultaneous ECG recordings and including patients with atrial flutter (AFL). METHODS AND RESULTS: Unselected patients undergoing direct current cardioversion for treatment of AF or AFL were asked to perform 1-min heart rhythm recordings post-treatment, at least twice daily for 30 days at home, using an iPhone 7 smartphone running the CORAI Heart Monitor PPG application simultaneously with a single-lead ECG recording (KardiaMobile). Photoplethysmography and ECG recordings were read independently by two experienced readers. In total, 280 patients recorded 18 005 simultaneous PPG and ECG recordings. Sufficient quality for diagnosis was seen in 96.9% (PPG) vs. 95.1% (ECG) of the recordings (P < 0.001). Manual reading of the PPG recordings, compared with manually interpreted ECG recordings, had a sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of 97.7%, 99.4%, and 98.9% with AFL recordings included and 99.0%, 99.7%, and 99.5%, respectively, with AFL recordings excluded. CONCLUSION: A novel smartphone-PPG method can be used by patients unsupervised at home to achieve accurate heart rhythm diagnostics of AF and AFL with very high sensitivity and specificity. This smartphone-PPG device can be used as an independent heart rhythm diagnostic device following cardioversion, without the requirement of confirmation with ECG.

Peak frequency mapping of atypical atrial flutter.

INTRODUCTION: Peak frequency (PF) mapping is a novel method that may identify critical portions of myocardial substrate supporting reentry. The aim of this study was to describe and evaluate PF mapping combined with omnipolar voltage mapping in the identification of critical isthmuses of left atrial (LA) atypical flutters. METHODS AND RESULTS: LA omnipolar voltage and PF maps were generated in flutter using the Advisor HD-Grid catheter (Abbott) and EnSite Precision Mapping System (Abbott) in 12 patients. Normal voltage was defined as ≥0.5 mV, low-voltage as 0.1-0.5 mV, and scar as <0.1 mV. PF distributions were compared with ANOVA and post hoc Tukey analyses. The 1 cm radius from arrhythmia termination was compared to global myocardium with unpaired t-testing. The mean age was 65.8 ± 9.7 years and 50% of patients were female. Overall, 34 312 points were analyzed. Atypical flutters most frequently involved the mitral isthmus (58%) or anterior wall (25%). Mean PF varied significantly by myocardial voltage: normal (335.5 ± 115.0 Hz), low (274.6 ± 144.0 Hz), and scar (71.6 ± 140.5 Hz) (p < .0001 for all pairwise comparisons). All termination sites resided in low-voltage regions containing intermediate or high PF. Overall, mean voltage in the 1 cm radius from termination was significantly lower than the remaining myocardium (0.58 vs. 0.95 mV, p < .0001) and PF was significantly higher (326.4 vs. 245.1 Hz, p < .0001). CONCLUSION: Low-voltage, high-PF areas may be critical targets during catheter ablation of atypical atrial flutter.

A Simple Score to Predict New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation After Ablation of Typical Atrial Flutter.

BACKGROUND: New-onset atrial fibrillation (NeAF) is common after cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent counterclockwise atrial flutter (CCW-AFL) ablation. This study aimed to investigate a simple predictive model of NeAF after CCW-AFL ablation. METHODS: From January 2013, to December 2017, consecutive patients receiving CCW-AFL ablation were enrolled from 3 centres. Clinical, echocardiographic, and electrocardiographic data were collected and followed. Patients from 2 centres and another centre were assigned into the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. In the derivation cohort, logistic regression was performed to evaluate the ability of parameters to discriminate those with and without NeAF. A score system was developed and then validated. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-one patients (mean 59.7 ± 13.6 age; 205 male) were analyzed. During follow-up (73.0 ± 6.5 months), 107 patients (39.5%) had NeAF; 190 and 81 patients were detected in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. Hypertension, age ≥ 70 years, left atrial diameter ≥ 42 mm, P-wave duration ≥ 120 ms and the negative component of flutter wave in lead II ≥ 120 ms were selected as the final parameters. A weighted score was used to develop the HAD-AF score ranging from 0 to 9. In the derivation cohort, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.938 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.902-0.974), superior to those of currently used CHA2DS2-VASC (0.679, 95% CI, 0.600-0.757) and HATCH scores (0.651, 95% CI, 0.571-0.730) (P < 0.001). Performance maintained in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Six years after CCW-AFL ablation, 39.5% of patients developed NeAF. HAD-AF score can reliably identify patients likely to develop NeAF after CCW-AFL ablation.

Sensitivity and specificity of handheld one lead ECG detecting atrial fibrillation in an outpatient clinic setting.

AIMS: To validate the sensitivity and specificity of the Zenicor One handheld ECG device for detection of atrial fibrillation in an outpatient clinical setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients attending outpatient clinics at Danderyd Hospital (n = 220) were examined with one lead handheld ECG immediately after standard care 12­lead ECG recording. Twelve recordings were excluded (atrial flutter or pacing) or missing. The recordings were dichotomously categorized as "atrial fibrillation" or "not atrial fibrillation" by two senior cardiologists. In cases of diverging interpretations, a third senior cardiologist had the deciding vote. Sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing atrial fibrillation was calculated with 12­lead ECG as gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of atrial fibrillation with one lead handheld ECG and 12­lead ECG as gold standard was 98% and 99% respectively. CONCLUSION: In a health-care outpatient setting, Zenicor One handheld ECG had high sensitivity and specificity for detection of atrial fibrillation when compared with 12­lead ECG.

Incidence and patterns of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter-the FLUTFIB study.

AIMS: In patients with atrial flutter (AFL), ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) is a highly effective procedure to prevent AFL recurrence, but atrial fibrillation (AF) may occur during follow-up. The presented FLUTFIB study was designed to identify the exact incidence, duration, timely occurrence, and associated symptoms of AF after CTI ablation using continuous cardiac monitoring via implantable loop recorders. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred patients with AFL without prior AF diagnosis were included after CTI ablation (mean age 69.7 ± 9.7 years, 18% female) and received an implantable loop recorder for AF detection. After a median follow-up of 24 months 77 patients (77%) were diagnosed with AF episodes. Median time to first AF occurrence was 180 (43-298) days. Episodes lasted longer than 1 h in most patients (45/77, 58%). Forty patients (52%) had AF-associated symptoms.Patients with and without AF development showed similar baseline characteristics and neither HATCH- nor CHA2DS2-VASc scores were predictive of future AF episodes. Oral anticoagulation (OAC) was stopped during FU in 32 patients (32%) and was re-initiated after AF detection in 15 patients (15%). No strokes or transient ischaemic attack episodes were observed during follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study represents the largest investigation using implantable loop recorders (ILRs) to detect AF after AFL ablation and shows a high incidence of AF episodes, most of them being asymptomatic and lasting longer than 1 h. In anticipation of trials determining the duration of AF episodes that should trigger OAC initiation, these results will help to guide anticoagulation management after CTI ablation.

Cardiovascular Disease: Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia in adults, with lifetime rates of 21% to 33%. There are numerous risk factors, including older age, hypertension, coronary disease, obstructive sleep apnea, diabetes, and others. Patients engaging in lifelong high-endurance exercise also have increased risk. Some organizations recommend screening; others do not. However, many patients identify AF themselves using mobile cardiac monitoring devices, some of which accurately detect the arrhythmia. Patients with AF with hemodynamic instability are treated with immediate synchronized cardioversion. Treatment options for stable patients include scheduled cardioversion, rhythm control with pharmacotherapy, catheter ablation, and rate control with pharmacotherapy. Catheter ablation is increasingly used as first-line therapy, with up to 80% of patients remaining AF-free after one or two ablation treatments, an outcome superior to that with pharmacotherapy. Patients with AF should receive anticoagulation based on the CHA2DS2-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age 75 years or older [doubled], Diabetes, prior Stroke or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism [doubled], Vascular disease, Age 65 to 74 years, Sex category) score, and also before and immediately after ablation or cardioversion. It is uncertain whether long-term anticoagulation is needed after successful ablation. Atrial flutter (AFL) is the second most common sustained supraventricular arrhythmia. Patients with AFL are at risk of developing AF, and many recommendations for managing AFL are similar to those for AF. The preferred management for AFL is catheter ablation, with success rates exceeding 90%.