RESUMEN
Infective native aneurysms (INA) of the infrapopliteal arteries are rare and have previously been poorly described. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the literature of this entity. Furthermore, two case reports of our own clinical experience are presented. PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and Web of Science were searched for articles on INAs of the infrapopliteal segment from January 1990 to September 2023. Article screening and selection were performed adhering to PRISMA guidelines. A total of 98 articles were screened and 20 were eligible for inclusion, of which all were case reports. In total, 22 patients with 28 infrapopliteal INAs were identified. The majority of INAs were located in the tibioperoneal trunk (n = 10, 36%) followed by the posterior tibial artery (n = 7, 25%). A current, or history of, infective endocarditis (IE) was described in 18 out of 22 patients (82%). Two patients died during hospitalization and one patient required a transfemoral amputation. A conservative antibiotic-only approach was chosen in three out of 28 INAs, two of which were the case reports described in this article; surgical or endovascular intervention was performed in 19 out of 28 aneurysms. No complications occurred in the conservative group, but one complication (transfemoral amputation) occurred in the interventional group. Infrapopliteal INA is a rare entity, and most described cases are precipitated by IE. Surgery or endovascular treatment might be indicated, but more research is warranted to define which patient would benefit and by what surgical approach.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Infectado , Antibacterianos , Arteria Poplítea , Humanos , Arteria Poplítea/cirugía , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/microbiología , Aneurisma Infectado/microbiología , Aneurisma Infectado/cirugía , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico , Aneurisma Infectado/mortalidad , Aneurisma Infectado/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Riesgo , Amputación Quirúrgica , Adulto , Resultado FatalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of biological grafts provides acceptable mid- and long-term results in native or prosthetic vascular infections. Several reports describe the successful use of bovine pericardium in case of vascular infections, mainly as a large patch to be sutured as a tubular graft. Recently, a novel prefabricated bovine pericardium graft (Biointegral Surgical No-React® Inc, Mississauga, ON, Canada) has been introduced in clinical practice with promising results. In this study, we report our preliminary experience utilizing Biointegral Surgical graft in case of native and or prosthetic aorto-iliac and infrainguinal infection. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 20 patients with native or prosthetic aorto-iliac and infrainguinal infection who underwent in situ reconstruction (ISR) with a Biointegral Surgical No-React bovine pericardium prosthesis between October 2020 and February 2023 at the Vascular Surgery Unit of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli - IRCCS in Rome, Italy. All patients followed a standardized protocol including postoperative anticoagulation and long-term intravenous antibiotics. RESULTS: The indication for surgery was: mycotic aortic aneurysm in 4 patients (20%), graft infection after abdominal aortic repair in 11 patients (55%), peripheral graft infection in 5 patients (25%). Complete excision of the infected aorta or prosthetic graft, surgical debridement and ISR were performed in all patients. Hospital mortality rate was 5% (n = 1) and graft-related mortality of 0%. During follow-up (median 13 months, range 6-34 months), reinfection was 5.2% and primary graft patency 94.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of prefabricated bovine pericardial grafts represents a promising option for the treatment of native and prosthetic aorto-iliac and infrainguinal infections. The application of this biological graft with a standardized postoperative protocol has been associated with a satisfactory patency and reinfection rate without increased bleeding complications.
Asunto(s)
Bioprótesis , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Prótesis Vascular , Pericardio , Diseño de Prótesis , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/mortalidad , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pericardio/trasplante , Masculino , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Animales , Bovinos , Factores de Tiempo , Xenoinjertos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Arteria Ilíaca/cirugía , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Factores de Riesgo , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Aneurisma Infectado/cirugía , Aneurisma Infectado/microbiología , Aneurisma Infectado/mortalidad , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico por imagen , ReoperaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Infected aortic grafts and mycotic aneurysms represent one of the most complex challenges faced by vascular surgeons. Treatment has progressed from extra-anatomical bypass to in situ reconstruction. Additionally, bovine pericardium reconstruction (BPR) has increased, due to accessibility and reduced lower limb morbidity. There remains, however, limited evidence for its use. The aim is to pool all known data to understand outcomes following BPR of mycotic aneurysms or infected vascular grafts. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in November 2021 with subsequent computerized meta-analysis of the pooled results and a final search in March 2022. Three databases, Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and National Institutes of Health PubMed (PubMed), were searched for the search term "(bovine OR xenoprosthetic) AND (aneurysm)", according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS: From 9 studies, there were 133 patients: 67% graft infections and 33% mycotic aneurysms. Fifty-seven percent of reconstructions were in the abdominal aorta and 33% were in the thoracic aorta. One hundred fifty-eight pathogens were identified, including Staphylococcus aureus (23%), Candida albicans (13%), and Escherichia coli (13%). In 12%, no microorganisms were identified. Thirty-day mortality was 19.14% (CI 10.83-28.71), late mortality was 19.08% (confidence interval [CI] 7.76-32.83), and overall mortality was 40.20% (CI 29.82-50.97). One patient died intraoperatively. There were a total of 151 in-hospital complications after 30 days postoperation. Common complications were acute renal failure (17%), pneumonia (14%), delirium (12%), respiratory insufficiency (11%) and renal insufficiency (7%). Lower limb ischemia was low, occurring in 5.66% (CI 0.54-13.82) of patients. Loss of graft patency leading to reintervention occurred in 1.20% (CI 0.00-7.71) of the grafts. Reinfection rate was 0.00% (CI 0.00-1.21). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis highlights low reinfection and high graft patency using BPR with medium-length follow-up; however, there remain limited long-term and comparative data regarding options for aortic reconstruction. As expected in this complex cohort, the complication rate and 30-day mortality remain high.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Infectado , Bioprótesis , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Prótesis Vascular , Xenoinjertos , Pericardio , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Aneurisma Infectado/cirugía , Aneurisma Infectado/microbiología , Aneurisma Infectado/mortalidad , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Animales , Pericardio/trasplante , Resultado del Tratamiento , Bovinos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , Masculino , Femenino , Factores de Tiempo , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/microbiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Medición de Riesgo , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Infected native aneurysms (INAs) of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries are uncommon, but potentially fatal. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has recently been introduced as a durable treatment option, with outcomes comparable to those yielded by conventional open repair. However, owing to the rarity of the disease, the strengths and limitations of each treatment remain uncertain. The present study aimed to separately assess post-open repair and post-EVAR outcomes and to clarify factors affecting the short-term and late prognosis after each treatment. METHODS: Using a nationwide clinical registry, we investigated 600 patients treated with open repair and 226 patients treated with EVAR for INAs of the abdominal aorta and/or common iliac artery. The relationships between preoperative or operative factors and postoperative outcomes, including 90-day and 3-year mortality and persistent or recurrent aneurysm-related infection, were examined. RESULTS: Prosthetic grafts were used in >90% of patients treated with open repair, and in situ and extra-anatomic arterial reconstruction was performed in 539 and 57 patients, respectively. Preoperative anemia and imaging findings suggestive of aneurysm-enteric fistula were independently associated with poor outcomes in terms of both 3-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-2.62; P = .046, and HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.12-4.46; P = .022, respectively) and persistent or recurrent infection (odds ratio [OR], 2.16; 95% CI, 1.04-4.49; P = .039, and OR, 4.96; 95% CI, 1.81-13.55; P = .002, respectively) after open repair, whereas omental wrapping or packing and antibiotic impregnation of the prosthetic graft for in situ reconstruction contributed to improved 3-year survival (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39-0.92; P = .019, and HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.88; P = .014, respectively). Among patients treated with EVAR, abscess formation adjacent to the aneurysm was significantly associated with the occurrence of persistent or recurrent infection (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.06-4.72; P = .034), whereas an elevated preoperative white blood cell count was predictive of 3-year mortality (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.00-3.13; P = .048). CONCLUSIONS: Profiles of prognostic factors differed between open repair and EVAR in the treatment of INAs of the abdominal aorta and common iliac artery. Open repair may be more suitable than EVAR for patients with concurrent abscess formation.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Infectado , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Aneurisma Ilíaco , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Masculino , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Anciano , Aneurisma Ilíaco/cirugía , Aneurisma Ilíaco/mortalidad , Aneurisma Ilíaco/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Ilíaco/microbiología , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Aneurisma Infectado/cirugía , Aneurisma Infectado/microbiología , Aneurisma Infectado/mortalidad , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/mortalidad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Recurrencia , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to describe the microbiology of surgically treated infective native (mycotic) aortic aneurysms (INAAs), and associated survival and development of infection-related complications (IRCs). METHODS: Data were pooled from 2 nationwide studies on surgically treated patients with INAAs in Sweden, between 1994 - 2016. Patients were grouped and analyzed according to culture results: 1) Staphylococcus aureus, 2) Streptococcus species (sp.), 3) Salmonella sp., 4) Enterococcus sp., 5) Gram-negative intestinal bacteria, 6) Other sp. (all other species found in culture), and 7) Negative cultures. RESULTS: A sum of 182 patients were included, mean age 71 years (standard deviation; SD: 8.9). The median follow-up was 50.3 months (range 0 - 360). 128 (70.3%) patients had positive blood and/or tissue culture; Staphylococcus aureus n = 38 (20.9%), Streptococcus sp. n = 37 (20.3%), Salmonella sp. n = 19 (10.4%), Enterococcus sp. n = 16 (8.8%), Gram-negative intestinal bacteria n = 6, (3.3%), Other sp. n = 12 (6.6%) and Negative cultures n = 54 (29.7%). The estimated survival for the largest groups at 2-years after surgery was: Staphylococcus aureus 62% (95% Confidence interval 53.9 - 70.1), Streptococcus sp. 74.7% (67.4 - 82.0), Salmonella sp. 73.7% (63.6 - 83.8), Enterococcus sp. 61.9% (49.6 - 74.2), and Negative cultures 89.8% (85.5 - 94.1), P = .051. There were 37 IRCs (20.3%), and 19 (51.4%) were fatal, the frequency was insignificant between the groups. The majority of IRCs, 30/37 (81%), developed during the first postoperative year. CONCLUSION: In this assessment of microbiological findings of INAAs in Sweden, 50% of the pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus sp., or Salmonella sp.. The overall 20%-frequency of IRCs, and its association with high mortality, motivates long-term antibiotic treatment regardless of microbial findings.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Infectado/microbiología , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Streptococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Anciano , Aneurisma Infectado/complicaciones , Aneurisma Infectado/mortalidad , Enterococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , SueciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to demonstrate the clinical outcomes of open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for infective native aortic aneurysms (INAAs). METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Databases were searched for articles reporting OSR and/or EVAR repair of INAA. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Moga-Score. Random-effects models were used to calculate the pooled measures. RESULTS: A total of 34 studies were included, with 22 studies reporting OSR alone, 6 studies reporting EVAR alone and 6 comparative studies for INAAs. The pooled estimates of infection-related complications (IRCs) were 8.2% (95% CI 4.9%-12.2%) in OSR cohort and 23.2% (95% CI 16.1%-31.0%) in EVAR cohort. EVAR was associated with a significantly increased risk of IRCs compared with OSR during follow-up (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.0-3.7). As for survival outcomes, the summary estimate rate of all cause 30-day, 3-month and 1-year mortality in OSR cohort were 11.7% (95% CI 7.7%-16.1%), 21.6% (95%CI 16.3%-27.4%) and 28.3% (95% CI 20.5%-36.7%; I2=50.47%), respectively. For EVAR cohort, the summary estimate rate of all cause 30-day, 3-month and 1-year mortality were 4.9% (95% CI 1.1%-10.4%), 9.4% (95% CI 2.7%-18.7%) and 22.2% (95% CI 12.4%-33.7%), respectively. EVAR was associated with a significantly decreased of 30-day mortality (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.6). However, no difference was found between EVAR and OSR in 3-month (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0-1.1), 1-year all-cause mortality (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.1-1.1) or aneurysm-related mortality (OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.5-3.9). Moreover, no difference of incidence of reintervention was observed (OR 2.6, 95% CI 0.9-7.7; I2=53.7%) between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR could provide better short-term survival than OSR in patients with INAAs. However, patients undergoing EVAR suffered from higher risks of IRCs. EVAR could be considered as an alternative for low-risk patients with well-controlled infections or patients considered high-risk for open reconstruction.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Infectado/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Anciano , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico , Aneurisma Infectado/microbiología , Aneurisma Infectado/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico , Aneurisma de la Aorta/microbiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Retratamiento , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the survival and freedom from reinfection for patients with infected native aortic aneurysms (INAAs) treated with in situ revascularization (ISR), using either open surgical repair (OSR) or endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), and to identify the predictors of outcome. METHODS: Patients with INAAs who had undergone ISR from January 2005 to December 2020 were included in the present retrospective single-center study. The diagnosis of INAAs required a combination of two or more of the following criteria: (1) clinical presentation, (2) laboratory results, (3) imaging findings, and (4) intraoperative findings. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. The secondary endpoints were in-hospital mortality, estimated survival, patency, and freedom from reinfection using the Kaplan-Meier method. The predictive factors for adverse outcomes were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test or the Fisher exact test and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients (53 men [81.5%]; median age, 69.0 years; interquartile range, 61.5-75.0 years) were included, 31 (47.7%) were immunocompromised, 60 were symptomatic (92.3%), and 32 (49.2%) had presented with rupture, including 3 aortocaval fistulas (4.6%) and 12 aortoenteric fistulas (18.5%). The most common location was infrarenal (n = 39; 60.0%). Of the 65 patients, 55 (84.6%) had undergone primary OSR with ISR, 3 (4.6%) had required EVAR as a bridge to OSR, and 8 (12.3%) had undergone EVAR as definitive treatment. The approach was a midline laparotomy for 44 patients (67.7%), mostly followed by reconstruction and aortic-aortic bypass (n = 28; 40.6%) and the use of a silver and triclosan Dacron graft (n = 30; 43.5%). Causative organisms were identified in 55 patients (84.6%). The 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates were 6.2% (n = 4) and 10.8% (n = 7). The median follow-up was 33.5 months (interquartile range, 13.6-62.3 months). The estimated 1- and 5-year survival rates were 79.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67.6%-87.7%) and 67.4% (95% CI, 51.2%-79.3%). The corresponding freedom from reinfection rates were 92.5% (95% CI, 81.1%-97.1%) and 79.4% (95% CI, 59.1%-90.3%). On multivariate analysis, in-hospital mortality increased with uncontrolled sepsis (P < .0001), rapidly expanding aneurysms (P = .008), and fusiform aneurysms (P = .03). The incidence of reinfection increased with longer operating times (P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: The selective use of ISR and OSR combined with targeted antimicrobial therapy functioned reasonably well in the treatment of INAAs, although larger, prospective, multicenter studies with appropriately powered comparative cohorts are necessary to confirm our findings and to determine the best vascular substitute and precise role of EVAR as a bridge to OSR or definitive treatment.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Infectado/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Infectado/microbiología , Aneurisma Infectado/mortalidad , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta/microbiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reinfección , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to assess any relation between spondylitis and aortic aneurysmal disease by reviewing the current literature. METHODS: A systematic search was undertaken using MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases till May 2019, for articles reporting on patients suffering from spondylitis and aortic aneurysm. RESULTS: The most involved aortic segment was infrarenal aorta (56.9%). The lumbar vertebrae were more frequently affected (79.7%). Commonest symptoms were back pain (79.1%), fever (33.7%) and lower limb pain (29.1%). 55.8% of cases were diagnosed using computed tomography. The pathology was attributed to infectious causes in 25.1% of cases. 53.4% of patients were treated only for the aneurysm, 27.9% for both pathologies, while two patients solely for the vertebral disease. Endovascular aneurysm repair was chosen in 12.8% of cases. The 30-day mortality was 8.1% (7/86); mostly from vascular complications. CONCLUSIONS: A synchronous spondylitis and aortic aneurysm may share common etiopathology, when an infectious or inflammatory cause is presented. The lumbar vertebrae are more frequently affected. Low quality data do not allow safe conclusion to suggest the best treatment option.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Infectado , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Espondilitis , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico , Aneurisma Infectado/microbiología , Aneurisma Infectado/mortalidad , Aneurisma Infectado/terapia , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/microbiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/terapia , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Trasplante Óseo , Tratamiento Conservador , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Femenino , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteotomía , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Espondilitis/diagnóstico , Espondilitis/microbiología , Espondilitis/mortalidad , Espondilitis/terapia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Primary infected aneurysms of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries are potentially life-threatening. However, because of the rarity of the disease, its pathogenesis and optimal treatment strategy remain poorly defined. METHODS: A nationwide retrospective cohort study investigated patients who underwent surgical treatment for a primary infected abdominal aortic and/or common iliac artery (CIA) aneurysm between 2011 and 2017 using a Japanese clinical registry. The study evaluated the relationships between preoperative factors and postoperative outcomes including 90-day and 3-year mortality, and persistent or recurrent aneurysm-related infection. Propensity score matching was used to compare survival between patients who underwent in situ prosthetic grafting and those who had endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). RESULTS: Some 862 patients were included in the analysis. Preceding infection was identified in 30.2 per cent of the patients. The median duration of postoperative follow-up was 639 days. Cumulative overall survival rates at 30 days, 90 days, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years were 94.0, 89.7, 82.6, 74.9 and 68.5 per cent respectively. Age, preoperative shock and hypoalbuminaemia were independently associated with short-term and late mortality. Compared with open repair, EVAR was more closely associated with persistent or recurrent aneurysm-related infection (odds ratio 2.76, 95 per cent c.i. 1.67 to 4.58; P < 0.001). Propensity score-matched analyses demonstrated no significant differences between EVAR and in situ graft replacement in terms of 3-year all-cause and aorta-related mortality rates (P = 0.093 and P =0.472 respectively). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing surgical intervention for primary infected abdominal aortic and CIA aneursyms, postoperative survival rates were encouraging. Eradication of infection following EVAR appeared less likely than with open repair, but survival rates were similar in matched patients between EVAR and in situ graft replacement.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Infectado/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma Ilíaco/cirugía , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Aneurisma Infectado/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Prótesis Vascular , Estudios de Cohortes , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hipoalbuminemia/mortalidad , Aneurisma Ilíaco/mortalidad , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Análisis por Apareamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Choque/mortalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mycotic abdominal aorta aneurysm (MAAA) is a rare and life-threatening condition. Because of its rarity, there is a lack of adequately powered studies and consensus on its treatment and follow up. This study aimed to review the outcomes following surgical intervention for MAAA in a single tertiary centre and to formulate a management protocol based on available evidence and expert opinion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected by retrospective review of case records of all patients who underwent repair of MAAA in a single tertiary referral centre from 2001 to 2018. Demographic, clinical and outcome data were analysed and compared with previously published series in the literature. A management protocol was formulated based on available literature which was then reviewed and modified as per expert opinion from multidisciplinary discussions. RESULTS: Seventeen patients underwent repair of MAAA during the study period including 4 Open repairs, 4 surgeon modified fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repairs (SM FEVAR) and 9 endovascular aortic aneurysm repairs (EVAR). One-year overall survival was 94.1%, 3-year survival was 81.8% and 5-year survival was 75.0%. The infection-free survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 87.5%, 81.8% and 62.5%, respectively. The overall survival and infection-free survival curves for Open repair, EVAR and SM FEVAR when compared using Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) test and did not show any statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Management of MAAA with selective use of open or endovascular repair, in combination with appropriate long-term antibiotic therapy, can achieve acceptable outcomes. The proposed protocol can aid as a guiding document for the management of MAAA but needs taking into consideration individual patient variability and local expertise.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Infectado/cirugía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Protocolos Clínicos , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Infectado/microbiología , Aneurisma Infectado/mortalidad , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/microbiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Terapia Combinada , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Infected femoral artery pseudoaneurysms (IFAPs) are a known complication of illicit intravenous drug injection. As the opioid crisis in our country continues to worsen, we will likely see more IFAPs and algorithms for management of these patients will need to be elucidated. The aim of this study was to describe the surgical management and outcomes of patients presenting with IFAPs treated with femoral artery ligation. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective study of consecutive patients presenting to our institution with IFAPs associated with illicit drug injection between 2004 and 2017 and treated with primary ligation. Primary end points included major adverse limb events (MALE) and death. Baseline demographics, clinical features, and long-term outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Over the study period, 60 IFAPs were managed with arterial ligation in 58 patients. Fifty-two percent of patients underwent common femoral artery ligation, 30% of patients underwent a triple ligation (ligation of the common femoral artery, profunda femoris artery, and superficial femoral artery), and 18% of patients underwent ligation of the superficial femoral artery only. The average postoperative ankle-brachial index was 0.47. None of the patients underwent revascularization at the index procedure. In our early experience, four patients (6.6%) underwent delayed revascularization with a prosthetic bypass. Two of the patients subsequently re-presented with infected bypass grafts and required the only major amputations in our series. The mean follow-up was 51.3 months and four patients were lost to follow-up. No differences were identified in MALE between patients undergoing a femoral artery ligation vs a triple ligation. Nine patients (15%) died during the follow-up period and all deaths were unrelated to IFAP treatment; the mean survival from procedure to death was 28 months. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the largest series in the United States of IFAP related to illicit drug use treated with femoral artery ligation and found it is a safe procedure associated with low MALE. Reconstruction is not recommended and is associated with graft infection. Although the mortality rate in these patients was high, it was not related to the ligation procedure.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Falso/cirugía , Aneurisma Infectado/cirugía , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/complicaciones , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/cirugía , Adulto , Amputación Quirúrgica , Aneurisma Falso/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Falso/mortalidad , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Infectado/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Femoral/lesiones , Humanos , Ligadura , Recuperación del Miembro , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidad , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/mortalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Superior mesenteric artery aneurysms (SMAAs) are a rare clinical problem that can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The optimal surgical approach for both mycotic and degenerative SMAAs remains poorly defined. The study was designed to review our institutional experience and develop a treatment algorithm. METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective review was performed to document presentation, treatment, and outcomes of patients undergoing surgical repair of SMAAs from 2003 to 2020. The primary end-point was 30-day mortality, and secondary end-points included complications, patency, freedom from reinfection, freedom from reintervention, and survival. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (mean age: 46 ± 16 yrs; 50% male; mean diameter 2.4 ± 2.0 cm) underwent treatment of mycotic (50%) or degenerative (50%) SMAAs. Abdominal pain (66%) was the most common presenting symptom, and the diagnosis was confirmed with CT arteriography. Endocarditis secondary to intravenous drug abuse was responsible for most (88%) of the mycotic SMAAs, with a majority (66%) having positive cultures and Streptococcus being the most common organism. The majority (61%) of patients underwent urgent or emergent repair with aneurysmectomy and interposition saphenous vein bypass being the most common treatment of mycotic SMAAs while aneurysmectomy and prosthetic bypass were used most frequently for degenerative aneurysms. The operative mortality rate was 6% with a major complication rate of 17% (n = 3 patients: respiratory failure/reintubation-1, pulmonary embolism-1, necrotizing pancreatitis/graft disruption and death-1). The single death occurred in a patient with a degenerative aneurysm that developed postoperative pancreatitis and multiple organ dysfunction. The mean clinical follow-up time was 25 ± 48 (95% CI 1-48) months. The estimated primary patency, freedom from reinfection, and freedom from reintervention were 93 ± 7 %, 94 ± 5%, and 94 ± 5%, respectively, at 1 year. The overall mean survival was 55 ± 51 (95% CI 30-80) months with an estimated survival at 3 years of 77 ± 10%. CONCLUSIONS: SMAAs associated with both degenerative and mycotic etiologies can be treated using a variety of surgical approaches with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Mycotic SMAAs should likely be repaired, regardless of size, while the indications for asymptomatic, degenerative aneurysms remain to be defined by further natural history studies.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Infectado/cirugía , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Adulto , Anciano , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Infectado/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Reinfección , Retratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Vascular surgical groin wound infection (VS-GWI) has multiple causes and frequently is manifested as a limb- or life-threatening problem, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. For patients undergoing operative extirpation, in situ repair, extra-anatomic bypass, or ligation can be used; however, limited data exist describing comparative results of the different operative choices or conduit subtypes. Therefore, we sought to describe our experience with management of VS-GWI and to detail outcomes of the different strategies. METHODS: Patients (2003-2017) undergoing surgical treatment of VS-GWI (Szilagyi grade III) secondary to primary infectious arteritis or infected pseudoaneurysm after percutaneous intervention as well as previous prosthetic graft placement were reviewed. The primary end point was major adverse limb events (MALEs; major amputation, graft occlusion, or unplanned reintervention). Secondary end points included 30-day mortality, wound healing, amputation-free survival (AFS), and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to determine relative risk of end points; Kaplan-Meier methodology was employed to estimate freedom from outcomes. RESULTS: There were 149 patients (age, 65 ± 11 years; body mass index, 27 ± 6 kg/m2; 70% male; 32% diabetes) identified, of whom 120 (81%) had unilateral and 29 (19%) had bilateral VS-GWI. Indications included infected prosthetic bypass (88% [n = 131]; infrainguinal, 107; suprainguinal, 24) and primary infectious femoral artery complications (12% [n = 18]). A majority underwent single-stage operations (87% [n = 129]). In situ reconstruction occurred in 87% (n = 129); 9% (n = 13) underwent ligation, and 6% (n = 7) received extra-anatomic revascularization. Autogenous conduit was used most commonly (68% [n = 101/149]; 88% single stage), of which 81% (n = 80) were femoral vein. The remaining patients received cadaveric (15% [n = 23]; 87% single stage) or prosthetic (8% [n=12]; 67% single stage) grafts. Adjunctive myocutaneous flap was used in 37% (n = 54). Length of stay was 19 ± 15 days and 30-day mortality was 7% (n = 10), with no difference between conduit repair types. All femoral wounds healed (mean follow-up, 17 ± 11 months); however, 33% (n = 49) underwent reoperation (unplanned graft reintervention, 33%; graft occlusion, 16%; wound débridement, 15%; major amputation, 11%). Reinfection occurred in 17% (n = 27), with no difference between groups. MALE rate was 22% (n = 33; most were arterial reinterventions, 19%), with no difference in single-stage vs multistage, in situ vs extra-anatomic, or autogenous vs nonautogenous conduit strategies Predictors of MALE included younger age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.6 per decade; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.5; P = .02) and lower body mass index (<25 kg/m2; HR, 1.6 per BMI category; 95% CI, 1.1-2.5; P = .02). Overall, 1- and 3-year freedom from MALE, AFS, and survival were as follows: MALE, 74% ± 5% and 63% ± 6%; AFS, 68% ± 4% and 58% ± 5%; survival, 78% ± 3% and 70% ± 4%. Autogenous conduit use was associated with better survival (HR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.8; 1-year: 83% ± 4% vs nonautogenous, 78% ± 4%; 3-year: 68% ± 8% vs 53% ± 9%; log-rank, P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: An individualized approach to operative strategy and conduit choice leads to comparable outcomes in this challenging group of patients. VS-GWI can be safely managed with in situ, autogenous reconstruction in a majority of patients with acceptable mortality, excellent wound healing rates, and improved overall survival. However, a significant proportion of patients experience reinfection and MALEs, the preponderance of which are arterial reintervention, mandating need for close follow-up and graft surveillance.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Falso/cirugía , Aneurisma Infectado/cirugía , Arteritis/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Remoción de Dispositivos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Ingle/irrigación sanguínea , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/cirugía , Anciano , Amputación Quirúrgica , Aneurisma Falso/diagnóstico , Aneurisma Falso/microbiología , Aneurisma Falso/mortalidad , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico , Aneurisma Infectado/microbiología , Aneurisma Infectado/mortalidad , Arteritis/diagnóstico , Arteritis/microbiología , Arteritis/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Bases de Datos Factuales , Remoción de Dispositivos/efectos adversos , Remoción de Dispositivos/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Femenino , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/etiología , Humanos , Ligadura , Recuperación del Miembro , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/mortalidad , Reinfección , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/microbiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Cicatrización de HeridasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short and long-term results of in situ prosthetic graft treatment using rifampicin-soaked silver polyester graft in patients with aortic infection. MATERIAL AND METHOD: All the patients surgically managed in our center for an aortic infection were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was the intra-hospital mortality, secondary outcomes were limb salvage, persistent or recurrent infection, prosthetic graft patency, and long-term survival. RESULTS: From January 2004 to December 2015, 18 consecutive patients (12 men and 6 women) were operated on for aortic infection. Six mycotic aneurysms and 12 prosthetic infections, including 8 para-entero-prosthetic fistulas, were treated. In 5 cases, surgery was performed in emergency. During the early postoperative period, we performed one major amputation and two aortic infections were persistent. Intra-hospital mortality was 27.7%. The median follow-up among the 13 surviving patients was 26 months. During follow-up, none of the 13 patients presented reinfection or bypass thrombosis. CONCLUSION: This series shows that in situ revascularization with rifampicin-soaked silver polyester graft for aortic infection have results in agreement with the literature in terms of intra-hospital mortality with a low reinfection rate.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Infectado/cirugía , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Prótesis Vascular , Poliésteres , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Rifampin/administración & dosificación , Plata , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Infectado/microbiología , Aneurisma Infectado/mortalidad , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta/microbiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Femenino , Francia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Poliésteres/efectos adversos , Diseño de Prótesis , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico por imagen , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rifampin/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Plata/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To demonstrate post-treatment computed tomography (CT) findings and outcomes of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for mycotic aortic aneurysm (MAA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical data of patients with MAA who underwent EVAR from June 2010 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 22 patients were included (19 men and 3 women). The periaortic features of the MAA regression after EVAR were graded and evaluated by follow-up CT. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 36.5 months (range, 0.5-97 months.). The cumulative survival rate at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years was 95.5%, 86.4%, 81.6%, and 73.4%, respectively. The early and late infection-related complication (IRC) rate was 18.2% and 13.6%, respectively. One patient died within 1 month from severe acidosis and shock. Of the other patients, the median time to stable response of the MAA was 6 months (range, 3-36 months). Fourteen patients (66.7%) showed early response of the MAA, while 7 patients (33.3%) showed delayed response. A significant association was observed between delayed response and late IRCs (P = .026). CONCLUSIONS: The post-EVAR periaortic features on follow-up CT aid in monitoring the treatment response of the MAA. Early response of the MAA was associated with a low rate of late IRCs and might aid in adjusting the antibiotic duration after the patient has achieved complete or nearly complete regression of the MAA.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Infectado/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Aortografía , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Infectado/mortalidad , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Infected false aneurysms (IFA) caused by intravenous drug abuse are uncommon but challenging lesions. The best approach for the surgical management of this condition is still unknown. The aim is to present a single-center 14-year experience in the IFA treatment in intravenous drug abusers, thus providing additional data regarding the treatment options and outcome in these patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 32 consecutive patients with vascular injuries secondary to intravenous drug abuse, during the period from January 2004 to April 2018, was performed. Data of interest were extracted from patients' medical history records, anesthesia charts, and database implemented in daily practice, or were obtained by personal contact. The diagnosis was set based on history, physical examination and/or color Doppler sonography, multidetector computed tomographic angiography, and digital subtraction angiography. The outcome included graft patency, limb amputation, and mortality. RESULTS: During study period, 32 heroin abusers, predominantly males (81%), were surgically treated due to vascular injuries, with mean age of 35.2 years. The vast majority of patients have had an injury of the lower extremity blood vessels (84.3%) and the common femoral artery was the most common site of injury (59.4%). Three-quarters of patients underwent resection of the false aneurysm and ligation of the artery without reconstruction of the blood vessel. In 7 cases (21.9%), arterial reconstruction was performed with overall failure rate of 42.86%. The overall mortality rate was 6.25% and the rate of extremity salvage was 96.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The best treatment option is yet to be found, but based on the results of the present study, ligation of affected artery without revascularization seems to be an efficient, safe, and optimal treatment method, with minor risk of the extremity loss.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Falso/cirugía , Aneurisma Infectado/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Consumidores de Drogas , Dependencia de Heroína/complicaciones , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/complicaciones , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/cirugía , Adulto , Amputación Quirúrgica , Aneurisma Falso/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Falso/microbiología , Aneurisma Falso/mortalidad , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Infectado/microbiología , Aneurisma Infectado/mortalidad , Prótesis Vascular , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Femenino , Dependencia de Heroína/diagnóstico , Dependencia de Heroína/mortalidad , Humanos , Ligadura , Recuperación del Miembro , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/diagnóstico , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/microbiología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/mortalidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Mycotic aneurysms of the abdominal aorta (MAAA) can be treated by open repair (OR) or endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). This nationwide study provides an overview of the situation of MAAA treatment in The Netherlands in 2016. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted with all centers that registered aortic abdominal aneurysms in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit in 2016. Questionnaires on 1-year outcomes were sent to all centers that treated patients with MAAA. The primary aim was to determine 30-day and 1-year mortality and morbidity of OR- and EVAR-treated patients. Morbidity was determined by the need for reoperations and the number of readmissions to the hospital. RESULTS: Twenty-six MAAA were detected in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit database of 2016, resulting in an incidence of 0.7% of all registered abdominal aortic aneurysms. The 30-day mortality for OR and EVAR treated patients was 1 in 13 and 0 in 13, respectively. Major and minor reinterventions within 30 days were needed for two (one OR and one EVAR) and two (one OR and one EVAR) patients, respectively. Two patients (15.4%) in the OR group and one patient (7.7%) in the EVAR group were readmitted to hospital within 30 days. In total, 1-year outcomes of 23 patients were available. In the OR group, one patient (9.1%) died in the first postoperative year. There was one major reintervention (removal of endoprosthesis and spiralvein reconstruction) in the EVAR group. Two patients (18.2%) treated with OR and two (16.7%) treated with EVAR required a minor reintervention. In both groups, four patients (OR, 36.4%; EVAR, 33.3%) were readmitted to hospital within 1 year postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Both OR- and EVAR-treated patients show acceptable clinical outcomes after 30 days and at the 1-year follow-up. Depending on the clinical course of the patient, EVAR may be considered in the management of this disease.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Infectado/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Anciano , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Infectado/microbiología , Aneurisma Infectado/mortalidad , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/microbiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Esquema de Medicación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Auditoría Médica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Readmisión del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Infected coronary artery aneurysms (ICAA) represent a rare but potentially fatal complication of pre-existent atherosclerotic or non-atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, percutaneous coronary artery intervention, endocarditis or extracardiac infection. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of four cases in addition to 51 infected coronary artery aneurysms from the literature, for a total of 55 ICAA was performed. Clinical and morphological information including age, sex, clinical presentation, microbial cultures, size, location and associated abnormalities as well as patient outcome was reviewed. RESULTS: 83% of affected patients were adult males, with an average age of 55.24 years. The right coronary artery was the most commonly affected vessel (40%). In nearly 80% of the time, the responsible organism was either Staphylococcus aureus (53.3%), or Streptococcus (20%) infection. ICAA are typically large, on average 3.4 cm in diameter and can measure up to 9 cm. On contrast enhanced CT, imaging features include lobulated contour or saccular shape (54.2%) with thick wall or mural thrombus (87.5%). Associated abnormal appearance of the pericardium with either pericardial fluid, thickening or loculation is common (79.2%). CONCLUSION: ICAA are typically large, and characterized by a thick wall with a lobulated or saccular shape. Association with mediastinal, chest wall or pericardial abnormalities are common. This combination of findings, in the setting of fever, known infection, or recent coronary intervention should raise concern for ICAA.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Infectado/microbiología , Aneurisma Coronario/microbiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Infectado/mortalidad , Aneurisma Infectado/cirugía , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Aneurisma Coronario/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Coronario/mortalidad , Aneurisma Coronario/cirugía , Angiografía Coronaria , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Endovascular techniques have been increasingly used to treat mycotic aortic aneurysms. However, apart from survival, the potential benefits of open surgery and endovascular repair for mycotic aortic aneurysms are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and mid-term outcomes after open surgery versus endovascular repair for mycotic aortic aneurysms. METHODS: All patients treated for mycotic aortic aneurysms at Peking University People's Hospital between 2001 and 2017 were identified. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests. The reoperation rate was analyzed using a competing-risk analysis. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were identified. The mean follow-up time was 41 months (median, 29; range, 1-135 months). The 30-day mortality in the open surgery group was 8.7% (2/23) versus 5% (1/20) in the endovascular repair group (P = .999). The overall survival for open surgery and endovascular repair was 78% versus 75%, respectively, at 1 year, and 69% versus 41% (P = .210), respectively, at 5 years. But during the follow-up, the open surgery group demonstrated multiple benefits, including a shorter length of hospital stay (26.80 ± 14.1 days vs 42.73 ± 21.22 days, P = .026), fewer readmissions (mean 0.61 vs 1.30, P = .037), and lower infection-related reoperations (P = .018) than endovascular repair at 3 years. Subgroup analysis revealed better survival for open surgery in patients with a periaortic mass less than 20 mm (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences between endovascular repair and open surgery in survival. However, in the mid-term, the potential benefits of open surgery are favorable compared with endovascular repair, including lower infection-related reoperation rates and reduced medical burden.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Infectado/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Adulto , Anciano , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Infectado/microbiología , Aneurisma Infectado/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta/microbiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Reoperación , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to report the short- and medium-term outcome of surgeon-modified fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (SM-FEVAR) for acute complex aortic aneurysms. METHODS: Interrogation of a prospectively maintained database identified consecutive patients who underwent SM-FEVAR for acute complex aortic aneurysms (including mycotic aneurysms treated with rifampicin-soaked endografts) in a single institution between October 2009 and November 2018. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients (37 men; median age, 73 years [range, 50-85 years]; aneurysm diameter, 76 mm [interquartile range, 58-90 mm]) with acute thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (n = 50; 40 symptomatic, 10 ruptured; 19 extent I-III, 31 extent IV) or symptomatic type IA endoleaks after infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair (n = 4) underwent SM-FEVAR. Seven of the patients had adjunct chimney and periscope stent grafts or surgical bypasses. A total of 187 vessels (mean, 3.4 [range, 1-5] per patient) were targeted for preservation; nine occluded intraoperatively or within 30 days. The 30-day/in-hospital mortality was 16.7% (n = 9; symptomatic, 7.4%; rupture, 50%) and fell significantly from 29.6% (n = 8) in the first 27 patients to 3.7% (n = 1) in the most recent 27 patients (P = .0243). Spinal cord ischemia occurred in one patient (1.9%) who died within 30 days. No survivors required permanent renal dialysis. Estimated survival at 12 and 24 months was 73.2% (standard error [SE], 6.2%). Eight patients underwent 12 late aorta- or graft-related reinterventions. Estimated freedom from reintervention at 12 months and 24 months was 87.9% (SE, 5.2%) and 81.6% (SE, 6.4%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute complex aneurysms, SM-FEVAR provides a customized solution that is associated with good medium-term survival and durability. The knowledge and skills to perform safe SM-FEVAR should be within the capabilities of high-volume specialist aortic centers.