Vision loss due to atypical bilateral edema of the optic nerve in a patient with hereditary angioedema: A case report.

PURPOSE: To describe a rare case of vision loss due to bilateral edema of the optic nerve in a patient with Hereditary Angioedema, treated with prophylactic C1-esterase inhibitor. METHODS: A 60-year-old Caucasian male affected by Hereditary Angioedema with unknown genetic defect (HAE- UNK) was admitted to our hospital presenting bilateral vision loss (best corrected visual acuity of 20/32 in the right eye and hand motion in the left eye) during an HAE attack. Intravenous administration of C1- esterase inhibitor (C1-INH, 1500 IU, Berinert, CSL Behring) determined the resolution of facial and periorbital swelling, however visual impairment persisted, in contrast with previous attacks experienced by the patient. Fundus examination revealed a vital optic disc without papilledema in both eyes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head and orbits showed bilateral edema of the optic nerve sheath. Treatment with intravenous and oral steroids was ineffective. Subsequently, a prophylactic treatment strategy with subcutaneous C1-esterase inhibitor was started (7000 IU every four days). RESULTS: Complete regression of edema of the optic nerves was observed by imaging at two months of follow-up after chronic treatment with C1-esterase inhibitor (7000 IU every four days). Complete restoration of visual acuity was achieved (BCVA 20/20 in both eyes) and multimodal imaging of the optic nerves demonstrated the absence of anatomical and functional damage. CONCLUSION: Patients affected by HAE may show atypical presentation with edema of the optic nerves without involvement of the optic nerve head. They may significantly benefit from prophylactic and chronic treatment with C1-esterase inhibitor.

[Facial swelling due to angioedema: often mast cell mediated, but not always]. / Gelaatszwellingen door angio-oedeem.

Most cases of angioedema are mast cell mediated. We present three patients with angioedema, who were admitted to our emergency room or outpatient clinic. One of them did have mast cell mediated angioedema, despite insufficient response to initial antihistamine treatment. The other patients had more rare cases of angioedema, i.e. hereditary angioedema with C1-inhibitor deficiency and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor associated angioedema. We discuss similarities and differences in symptoms, diagnosis and treatment between these causes of angioedema. We recommend keeping the differential diagnosis of angioedema in mind when a patient with angioedema is presented, including rarer pathophysiological explanations.

Genetic Variants Leading to Urticaria and Angioedema and Associated Biomarkers.

Advances in next generation sequencing technologies, as well as their expanded accessibility and clinical use over the past 2 decades, have led to an exponential increase in the number of identified single gene disorders. Among these are primary atopic disorders-inborn errors of immunity resulting in severe allergic phenotypes as a primary presenting feature. Two cardinal aspects of type I immediate hypersensitivity allergic reactions are hives and angioedema. Mast cells (MCs) are frequent primary drivers of these symptoms, but other cells have also been implicated. Even where MC degranulation is believed to be the cause, mediator-induced symptoms may greatly vary among individuals. Angioedema-particularly in the absence of hives-may also be caused by hereditary angioedema conditions resulting from aberrant regulation of contact system activation and excessive bradykinin generation or impairment of vascular integrity. In these patients, swelling can affect unpredictable locations and fail to respond to MC-directed therapies. Genetic variants have helped delineate key pathways in the etiology of urticaria and nonatopic angioedema and led to the development of targeted therapies. Herein, we describe the currently known inherited and acquired genetic causes for these conditions, highlight specific features in their clinical presentations, and discuss the benefits and limitations of biomarkers that can help distinguish them.

Successful treatment of post-pericardiotomy syndrome via C1 inhibitor replacement therapy in a hereditary angioedema patient with Marfan syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency (HAE-C1INH) is caused by dysfunctional C1-INH protein due to mutations in the SERPING1 gene encoding C1-INH. Marfan syndrome is a genetic connective tissue disease that affects the cardiovascular and ocular systems along with the skeletal system. In this case, we present the successful treatment of post-pericardiotomy syndrome unresponsive to classical therapy, which has not been described in the literature. The syndrome developed in a patient with hereditary angioedema (HAE) who underwent open heart surgery due to cardiac involvement in Marfan syndrome. CASE: A nine-year-old male HAE-C1INH patient underwent open heart surgery secondary to cardiac involvement caused by Marfan syndrome. To prevent HAE attacks, 1000 units of C1 inhibitor concentrate therapy were given 2 hours before and 24 hours after the operation. Post-pericardiotomy syndrome was diagnosed on the postoperative second day and ibuprofen 15 mg/kg/day (3 weeks) was started. Since there was no response to classical treatment on the 21st postoperative day, C1 inhibitor concentrate treatment was planned as 1000 units/ dose for 2 days a week considering a prolonged hereditary angioedema attack. In the second week of treatment, complete recovery was achieved for pericardial effusion with a total of 4 doses. CONCLUSIONS: We emphasize that in patients with hereditary angioedema undergoing this treatment, care should be taken in terms of complications that may be associated with the disease even if short-term prophylaxis is given before operations and that longer-term use of C1 inhibitor concentrate has a place in treatment.

Gene Mutations Linked to Hereditary Angioedema in Solitary Angioedema Patients With Normal C1 Inhibitor.

BACKGROUND: Chronic recurrent angioedema without wheals (CRA) with normal C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) that is unresponsive to antihistamines may involve patients with recurrent angioedema of unknown cause (ie, so-called non-histaminergic idiopathic angioedema) as well as patients with hereditary angioedema with normal C1-INH (HAEnCI) when HAEnCI occurs in only one family member. OBJECTIVE: To identify patients with one of type of HAEnCI in a group of patients with CRA with normal C1-INH that was unresponsive to antihistamines. METHODS: A total of 132 patients with CRA and normal C1-INH that was unresponsive to antihistamines underwent mutational and clinical analysis. The presence of hereditary angioedema-specific mutations in Factor XII, plasminogen, ANGPT1, KNG1, MYOF, and HS3ST6 genes was tested by Sanger sequencing. When an HAEnCI-causing mutation was identified, available asymptomatic relatives were genetically tested. RESULTS: In 116 of 132 solitary patients with CRA (87.9%), none of the six HAEnCI-linked mutations could be found. Ten patients (7.6%) had the Factor XII mutation c.983C>A (p.T328K) and six (4.5%) the plasminogen mutation c.988A>G (p.K330E). Other mutations linked to HAEnCI were not found in this patient series. In the 16 families with HAEnCI, 11 asymptomatic carriers of one of the HAEnCI-linked mutations were identified. CONCLUSIONS: A search for HAEnCI-linked mutations in patients with solitary CRA may lead to the detection of patients and families with HAEnCI. This is important because family members can be identified who are at risk for developing potentially life-threatening angioedema, although they were previously asymptomatic. Without genetic investigation, the risk for an HAEnCI would have remained undetected in these patients and asymptomatic relatives.

Recurrent abdominal pain as the only clinical manifestation of hereditary angioedema type II.

Recurrent abdominal pain is a common reason for consultation in Gastroenterology. The differential diagnosis includes hereditary angioedema (HAE), a rare disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of angioedema, without urticaria or pruritus, which most often affects the skin, but also mucosal tissues of the gastrointestinal tract, triggered by diverse factors such as infections, trauma, surgery, drugs, or stress. It is a disease with a difficult diagnosis due to its heterogeneous and transitory clinical features, so having a clinical suspicion in the appropriate context would allow the administration of a specific treatment and avoid unnecessary examinations. We present the case of a 19-year-old male followed-up for recurrent abdominal pain that, after numerous microbiological, endoscopic, and radiological examinations, complement tests were requested, obtaining low levels of C4 with increased levels of C1 inhibitor and reduced functional activity, being diagnosed with HAE type II.

Positive perception of COVID-19 vaccination in HAE: No significant impact of vaccination on disease course.

Background: There are some adverse effects with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, but the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on attacks in hereditary angioedema (HAE) is not well defined. Objective: We aimed to investigate the influence of COVID-19 vaccination on the course of HAE. Method: The COVID-19 vaccination status was determined in 140 adult patients with HAE. The number and severity of attacks recorded from patients' diaries were evaluated at four different periods, comprising 1 month before the first dose, the period between the first and the second doses of COVID-19 vaccine in all the patients, the period between the second dose and the third doses in those who received three doses, and 1 month after the last vaccination dose. The disease and attack severities were assessed with the disease severity score (DSS) and 10-point visual analog scale, respectively. The patients were divided into two main groups as group 1 (those who had at least two doses of COVID-19 vaccines [n = 114]) and group 2 (those who had no vaccination [n = 26]). Only Sinovac and Biontech, which were only approved in Turkey. Results: The mean ± standard deviation DSS was significantly higher in the patients who experienced an attack after vaccination within 48 hours (6.61 ± 1.88 versus 4.14 ± 1.69; p < 0.001). Long-term prophylaxis was less common in the patients with an increased number of attacks (n = 5 (27.8%) versus n = 54 (56.3%); p = 0.027). The number of patients with less than a high school education was higher in group 2 (n = 23 [88.5%]) than in group 1 (n = 26 [3.1%]) (p < 0.001). The number of patients who had concerns about the triggering of a vaccine-induced HAE attack or about the possible vaccine adverse effects was higher in group 2 (n = 26 [100%]) than in group 1 (n = 74 [64.9%]). Conclusion: It seems that COVID-19 vaccination does not increase HAE attacks regardless of the type of the vaccines. We recommend that HAE activity should be under control before COVID-19 vaccination, and the patients should be well informed about the safety of the vaccines.

Presentation of an extraordinary colic: abdominal pain as the first and only utterance of an acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency.

C1-inhibitor deficiency is a rare disease which incorporates acute self-limiting intermittent swelling of the subcutaneous tissue and mucous membranes. Attacks most frequently affect the face and/or the upper airway. Isolated angioedema of the small bowel is an uncommon manifestation and often accompanied by diagnostic delay. In the present case, abdominal pain turned out to be the first and only utterance of an acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency, secondary to a splenic marginal zone lymphoma. Imaging showed wall thickening of the small intestine, ascites and splenomegaly. The abdominal pain and intestinal wall thickening with surrounding ascites on imaging spontaneously resolved each episode within 2-3 days. Gastrointestinal manifestations of angioedema may mimic an acute abdomen, and subsequently one-third of these patients undergo unnecessary surgery prior to a definite diagnosis. This emphasises the importance of considering the diagnosis in case of an 'extraordinary colic'.

Bradykinin mediated gastrointestinal edema as a cause of abdominal attacks in patients with hereditary angioedema due to C1-inhibitor deficiency.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) due to C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency is a rare hereditary disease characterized by recurrent subcutaneous or submucosal angioedema due to uncontrolled bradykinin production caused by C1-INH dysfunction. Submucosal gastrointestinal swellings provoking abdominal attacks are common and mimic acute abdomen, thus constituting a diagnostic challenge. We aimed to investigate the difficulties in diagnosing abdominal attacks in patients with C1-INH-HAE and to assess the diagnostic value of medical history, the course of the attack, abdominal imaging, and treatment efficacy. The retrospective analysis of diagnostic problems and treatment complications of abdominal attacks in 274 patients with C1-INH-HAE were performed. The value of history, laboratory findings, prodromal symptoms and course of attacks and imaging were assessed. Abdominal attacks were confirmed in 274 of the 322 patients (85%; 190 women and 84 men; age, 4-70 years). In 49% of cases, the abdominal attack was the first and the only symptom for years. The simultaneous presence of marginal erythema (45% of cases), subcutaneous edema (30%), and pharyngo-laryngeal edema (10%) facilitated the diagnosis of an abdominal attack due to C1-INH-HAE. Abdominal attacks manifested with recurrent acute abdominal symptoms lasting 2 to 5 days. The disease course was characterized by the phase of progressive prodromal symptoms followed by peak symptoms and spontaneous symptom resolution. Abdominal imaging often revealed abundant ascites and limited bowel edema. In 60 cases (22%), the diagnostic difficulties resulted in exploratory laparotomy, which was inconclusive in 48 patients (80%). The attacks usually subsided within 2 hours from the administration of recommended drugs (plasma-derived C1-INH, recombinant C1-INH or icatibant). We conclude that recurrent abdominal attacks lasting a few days and resolving spontaneously were common symptoms of C1-INH-HAE. Abdominal imaging revealed transitional fluid or bowel edema. The effectiveness of recommended drugs as plasma-derived C1-INH, recombinant C1-INH or icatibant confirmed the diagnosis.

Consider Hereditary Angioedema in the Differential Diagnosis for Unexplained Recurring Abdominal Pain.

Health care providers are likely to encounter patients with recurrent unexplained abdominal pain. Because hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare disease, it may not be part of the differential diagnosis, especially for patients who do not have concurrent skin swelling in addition to abdominal symptoms. Abdominal pain is very common in patients with HAE, occurring in up to 93% of patients, with recurrent abdominal pain reported in up to 80% of patients. In 49% of HAE attacks with abdominal symptoms, isolated abdominal pain was the only symptom. Other abdominal symptoms that commonly present in patients with HAE include distension, cramping, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. The average time from onset of symptoms to diagnosis is 6 to 23 years. Under-recognition of HAE in patients presenting with predominant gastrointestinal symptoms is a key factor contributing to the delay in diagnosis, increasing the likelihood of unnecessary or exploratory surgeries or procedures and the potential risk of related complications. HAE should be considered in the differential diagnosis for patients with unexplained abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and/or diarrhea who have complete resolution of symptoms between episodes. As highly effective targeted therapies for HAE exist, recognition and diagnosis of HAE in patients presenting with isolated abdominal pain may significantly improve morbidity and mortality for these individuals.