Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 2.578
Filtrar
1.
Clin Sci (Lond) ; 138(18): 1131-1150, 2024 Sep 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39282930

RESUMEN

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors (VEGFRis) improve cancer survival but are associated with treatment-limiting hypertension, often attributed to endothelial cell (EC) dysfunction. Using phosphoproteomic profiling of VEGFRi-treated ECs, drugs were screened for mitigators of VEGFRi-induced EC dysfunction and validated in primary aortic ECs, mice, and canine cancer patients. VEGFRi treatment significantly raised systolic blood pressure (SBP) and increased markers of endothelial and renal dysfunction in mice and canine cancer patients. α-Adrenergic-antagonists were identified as drugs that most oppose the VEGFRi proteomic signature. Doxazosin, one such α-antagonist, prevented EC dysfunction in murine, canine, and human aortic ECs. In mice with sorafenib-induced-hypertension, doxazosin mitigated EC dysfunction but not hypertension or glomerular endotheliosis, while lisinopril mitigated hypertension and glomerular endotheliosis without impacting EC function. Hence, reversing EC dysfunction was insufficient to mitigate VEGFRi-induced-hypertension in this mouse model. Canine cancer patients with VEGFRi-induced-hypertension were randomized to doxazosin or lisinopril and both agents significantly decreased SBP. The canine clinical trial supports safety and efficacy of doxazosin and lisinopril as antihypertensives for VEGFRi-induced-hypertension and the potential of trials in canines with spontaneous cancer to accelerate translation. The overall findings demonstrate the utility of phosphoproteomics to identify EC-protective agents to mitigate cardio-oncology side effects.


Asunto(s)
Doxazosina , Células Endoteliales , Hipertensión , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Animales , Perros , Humanos , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/metabolismo , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Doxazosina/farmacología , Doxazosina/uso terapéutico , Células Endoteliales/efectos de los fármacos , Células Endoteliales/metabolismo , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/metabolismo , Proteómica/métodos , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Lisinopril/farmacología , Lisinopril/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Antihipertensivos/farmacología , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacología , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/farmacología , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico , Sorafenib/farmacología , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico
2.
Alcohol Alcohol ; 59(5)2024 Jul 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39270736

RESUMEN

AIMS: We conducted a proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial of the mu-opioid receptor antagonist, naltrexone, augmented with the alpha-1 adrenergic receptor antagonist, prazosin, for alcohol use disorder in veterans. We sought a signal that the naltrexone plus prazosin combination regimen would be superior to naltrexone alone. METHODS: Thirty-one actively drinking veterans with alcohol use disorder were randomized 1:1:1:1 to naltrexone plus prazosin (NAL-PRAZ [n = 8]), naltrexone plus placebo (NAL-PLAC [n = 7]), prazosin plus placebo (PRAZ-PLAC [n = 7]), or placebo plus placebo (PLAC-PLAC [n = 9]) for 6 weeks. Prazosin was titrated over 2 weeks to a target dose of 4 mg QAM, 4 mg QPM, and 8 mg QHS. Naltrexone was administered at 50 mg QD. Primary outcomes were the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS), % drinking days (PDD), and % heavy drinking days (PHDD). RESULTS: In the NAL-PRAZ condition, % reductions from baseline for all three primary outcome measures exceeded 50% and were at least twice as large as % reductions in the NAL-PLAC condition (PACS: 57% vs. 26%; PDD: 51% vs. 22%; PHDD: 69% vs. 15%) and in the other two comparator conditions. Standardized effect sizes between NAL-PRAZ and NAL-PLAC for each primary outcome measure were >0.8. All but one participant assigned to the two prazosin containing conditions achieved the target prazosin dose of 16 mg/day and maintained that dose for the duration of the trial. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that prazosin augmentation of naltrexone enhances naltrexone benefit for alcohol use disorder. These results strengthen rationale for an adequately powered definitive randomized controlled trial.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1 , Alcoholismo , Quimioterapia Combinada , Naltrexona , Antagonistas de Narcóticos , Prazosina , Prueba de Estudio Conceptual , Humanos , Naltrexona/uso terapéutico , Naltrexona/administración & dosificación , Prazosina/uso terapéutico , Prazosina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alcoholismo/tratamiento farmacológico , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Veteranos , Método Doble Ciego
3.
PLoS One ; 19(8): e0309222, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39172922

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To study the effects of benign prostatic hyperplasia treatments, namely: alpha-adrenergic receptor blockers, 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors on the risk of Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All male Medicare enrollees aged 65 or above who were diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia and received one of the study drugs between 2007-2020 were followed-up for the three outcomes. We used Cox regression analysis to assess the relative risk of each of the outcomes for each study drug compared to the most prescribed drug, tamsulosin, while controlling for demographic, socioeconomic and comorbidity factors. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The study analyzed 1.1 million patients for a mean follow-up period of 3.1 years from being prescribed one of the study drugs. For all outcomes, patients on tamsulosin were used as the reference for comparison. For mortality, alfuzosin was associated with 27% risk reduction (HR 0.73, 95%CI 0.68-0.78), and doxazosin with 6% risk reduction (HR 0.94, 95%CI 0.91-0.97). For Parkinson's disease, terazosin was associated with 26% risk reduction (HR 0.74, 95%CI 0.66-0.83), and doxazosin with 21% risk reduction (HR 0.79, 95%CI 0.72-0.88). For Alzheimer's disease, terazosin was associated with 27% risk reduction (HR 0.73, 95%CI 0.65-0.82), and doxazosin with 16% risk reduction (HR 0.84, 95%CI 0.76-0.92). Tadalafil was associated with risk reduction (27-40%) in all 3 outcomes. More research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of these observations. Given the availability of safer alternatives for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia, caution should be exercised when using tamsulosin in elderly patients, especially those with an increased risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Medicare , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Hiperplasia Prostática , Tamsulosina , Humanos , Masculino , Tamsulosina/uso terapéutico , Tamsulosina/efectos adversos , Anciano , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Hiperplasia Prostática/mortalidad , Hiperplasia Prostática/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/mortalidad , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/epidemiología , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/mortalidad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de 5-alfa-Reductasa/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de 5-alfa-Reductasa/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 5/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 5/efectos adversos
4.
Environ Toxicol Pharmacol ; 110: 104527, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39106924

RESUMEN

This study assessed the ability of α1 and α2-adrenergic drugs to decrease fentanyl-induced locomotor and ventilatory depression. Rats were given saline or fentanyl, followed by: (1) naltrexone, (2) naloxone, (3) nalmefene, (4) α1 agonist phenylephrine, (5) α1 antagonist prazosin, (6) α1D antagonist BMY-7378, (7) α2 agonist clonidine, (8) α2 antagonist yohimbine or (9) vehicle. All µ-opioid antagonists dose-dependently reversed fentanyl-induced locomotor and ventilatory depression. While the α1 drugs did not alter the effects of fentanyl, clonidine dose-dependently decreased locomotion and respiration with and without fentanyl. Conversely, yohimbine given at a low dose (0.3-1 mg/kg) stimulated ventilation when given alone and higher doses (>1 mg/kg) partially reversed (∼50 %) fentanyl-induced ventilatory depression, but not locomotor depression. High doses of yohimbine in combination with a suboptimal dose of naltrexone reversed fentanyl-induced ventilatory depression, suggestive of additivity. Yohimbine may serve as an effective adjunctive countermeasure agent combined with naltrexone to rescue fentanyl-induced ventilatory depression.


Asunto(s)
Fentanilo , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2 , Animales , Fentanilo/farmacología , Masculino , Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/metabolismo , Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/metabolismo , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/farmacología , Ratas , Locomoción/efectos de los fármacos , Analgésicos Opioides/farmacología , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/farmacología , Yohimbina/farmacología , Naltrexona/farmacología , Naltrexona/análogos & derivados , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/farmacología , Respiración/efectos de los fármacos
6.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 427, 2024 Jul 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39037497

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The study aimed to determine the typical clearance and volume of distribution values of tamsulosin in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and to identify factors with a measurable impact on the drug's elimination. METHODS: This open-label, single-arm population pharmacokinetic study involved 65 adult men with BPH who had been on tamsulosin therapy for at least seven days. The steady-state serum concentrations of tamsulosin were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry. Population pharmacokinetic parameters, their variability, and influencing factors were estimated based on a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model using NONMEM software. RESULTS: The estimated tamsulosin clearance in BPH patients was 0.719 L/h, and the steady-state volume of distribution was 32 L. Neither renal nor liver function parameters had a statistically significant effect on tamsulosin clearance. However, a positive correlation was observed between hemoglobin levels and tamsulosin clearance in the BPH patient cohort. CONCLUSION: Our investigation reveals significant associations between tamsulosin pharmacokinetics and specific characteristics of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to BPH. The study highlights that tamsulosin clearance is associated with hemoglobin levels in patients with LUTS/BPH. This study underscores the importance of considering patient-specific factors when managing BPH treatment with tamsulosin, emphasizing associations rather than causative relationships.


Asunto(s)
Hiperplasia Prostática , Tamsulosina , Humanos , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Tamsulosina/farmacocinética , Tamsulosina/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/farmacocinética , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/tratamiento farmacológico , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/etiología
8.
Investig Clin Urol ; 65(4): 342-350, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38978214

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study investigated the effect of administering tamsulosin before surgery on the successful insertion of a 12/14 French (F) ureteral access sheath (UAS) during the procedure, as well as the impact of preoperative and postoperative tamsulosin use on symptoms related to the ureteral stent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a randomized, single-center, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial involving 200 patients who underwent unilateral retrograde intrarenal surgery. Patients received either tamsulosin (0.4 mg) or placebo 1 week before surgery until stent removal. Patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups. Group 1 received tamsulosin throughout the study period. Group 2 received tamsulosin before surgery and placebo after surgery. Group 3 received placebo before surgery and tamsulosin after surgery. Group 4 received placebo before and after surgery. The USSQ (Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire) was completed between postoperative days 7 and 14 immediately before stent removal. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients were included in this analysis. Their mean age was 55.0±11.0 years, and 48 patients (30.0%) were female. In the group that received preoperative tamsulosin, the success rate of 12/14F UAS deployment was significantly higher than that of the preoperative placebo group (88.0 vs. 75.3%, p=0.038). Preoperative and postoperative tamsulosin did not significantly alleviate symptoms related to the ureteral stent. CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed that preoperative administration of tamsulosin improved the success of larger-sized UAS, whereas preoperative and postoperative tamsulosin use did not significantly alleviate symptoms related to ureteral stents.


Asunto(s)
Stents , Tamsulosina , Uréter , Humanos , Tamsulosina/uso terapéutico , Tamsulosina/administración & dosificación , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Uréter/cirugía , Anciano , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/administración & dosificación
11.
Cardiovasc Toxicol ; 24(8): 789-799, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38877381

RESUMEN

Levamisole is an anthelmintic drug restricted to veterinary use but is currently detected as the most widely used cocaine cutting agent in European countries. Levamisole-adulterated cocaine has been linked to acute kidney injury, marked by a decrease in glomerular filtration rate, which involves reduced renal blood flow, but data on the alteration of renovascular response produced by levamisole are scarce. Renal arteries were isolated from healthy rabbits and used for isometric tension recording in organ baths and protein analysis. We provide evidence that depending on its concentration, levamisole modulates renovascular tone by acting as a non-selective α-adrenergic receptor blocker and down-regulates α1-adrenoceptor expression. Furthermore, levamisole impairs the endothelium-dependent relaxation induced by acetylcholine without modifying endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) expression. However, exposure to superoxide dismutase (SOD) partially prevents the impairment of ACh-induced relaxation by levamisole. This response is consistent with a down-regulation of SOD1 and an up-regulation of NADPH oxidase 4 (Nox4), suggesting that endothelial NO loss is due to increased local oxidative stress. Our findings demonstrate that levamisole can interfere with renal blood flow and the coordinated response to a vasodilator stimulus, which could worsen the deleterious consequences of cocaine use.


Asunto(s)
Levamisol , Óxido Nítrico , Arteria Renal , Vasodilatación , Animales , Levamisol/farmacología , Levamisol/toxicidad , Conejos , Arteria Renal/efectos de los fármacos , Arteria Renal/metabolismo , Arteria Renal/fisiopatología , Óxido Nítrico/metabolismo , Vasodilatación/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/farmacología , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/toxicidad , Óxido Nítrico Sintasa de Tipo III/metabolismo , Estrés Oxidativo/efectos de los fármacos , Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/metabolismo , Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/efectos de los fármacos , Superóxido Dismutasa/metabolismo , NADPH Oxidasa 4/metabolismo , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Superóxido Dismutasa-1/metabolismo , Vasodilatadores/farmacología
12.
J Assoc Physicians India ; 72(4): 21-23, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38881078

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The isometric handgrip (IHG) test is commonly used to detect sympathetic autonomic dysfunction. Tamsulosin, approved for the management of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), acts as an antagonist for α1-adrenergic receptors (α1-AR), whereas prazosin, an α1 receptor blocker, being less selective than tamsulosin, is used as an antihypertensive agent clinically. Our objective was to investigate if there is a distinction in blood pressure (BP) increase during IHG exercise between individuals with essential hypertension taking tamsulosin compared to those taking prazosin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was performed on 50 subjects receiving tablet prazosin and 47 subjects receiving tamsulosin, who were asked to undergo an IHG test. Pre- and posttest BP was recorded for both the groups, and the difference in diastolic BP (DBP) (delta DBP) was compared between the groups and to their respective baseline values. RESULTS: Post-IHG test, mean DBP was found to be 93.98 ± 9.13 mm Hg in the prazosin group and 101.00 ± 12.05 mm Hg in the tamsulosin group, respectively. The change of delta DBP in the tamsulosin group was significant, but the prazosin group showed an insignificant rise in DBP. CONCLUSION: Prazosin, being less selective than tamsulosin in terms of α1 receptor antagonism, showed suppression of BP during IHG. Tamsulosin demonstrates high selectivity for prostatic receptors while showing minimal affinity for vascular receptors. As a result, its impact on BP is expected to be minimal.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1 , Presión Sanguínea , Fuerza de la Mano , Hipertensión , Prazosina , Hiperplasia Prostática , Tamsulosina , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Hiperplasia Prostática/fisiopatología , Prazosina/farmacología , Prazosina/uso terapéutico , Prazosina/administración & dosificación , Tamsulosina/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/farmacología , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Fuerza de la Mano/fisiología , Anciano , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , India
13.
Int J Urol ; 31(9): 968-974, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38934050

RESUMEN

Benign prostatic hyperplasia, a prevalent condition in aging men, is characterized by the proliferation of prostatic epithelial and stromal cells, which leads to bladder outlet obstruction and the exacerbation of lower urinary tract symptoms. There is increasing evidence that chronic prostatic inflammation contributes to the pathogenesis and progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia. This review explores the complex relationship between chronic inflammation and benign prostatic hyperplasia, focusing on the underlying mechanisms, clinical implications, and current therapeutic approaches. The pathophysiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia is multifaceted, involving factors such as hormonal changes, hypoxia, urine reflux into prostatic ducts and stroma, autoimmune responses, and infection-induced inflammation. Inflammatory cytokines, particularly interleukin-17 and interleukin-8, may play key roles in tissue remodeling and smooth muscle contraction within the prostate, thereby influencing benign prostatic hyperplasia progression. Current therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia include α1-blockers, phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors, 5α-reductase inhibitors, and plant-based treatments (e.g., pollen extract). These therapies aim to alleviate symptoms by reducing prostatic inflammation, improving blood flow, and inhibiting hormonal pathways involved in prostatic enlargement. However, patients with chronic prostatic inflammation often experience more severe lower urinary tract symptoms and may be resistant to conventional treatments. This resistance has prompted the exploration of alternative therapies targeting inflammation. Chronic prostatic inflammation plays a central role in the pathogenesis and severity of benign prostatic hyperplasia. An understanding of its mechanisms will enable the development of more effective treatments to improve the quality of life among patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.


Asunto(s)
Hiperplasia Prostática , Humanos , Hiperplasia Prostática/fisiopatología , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicaciones , Hiperplasia Prostática/terapia , Masculino , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/etiología , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/fisiopatología , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/tratamiento farmacológico , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/terapia , Próstata/patología , Próstata/inmunología , Próstata/fisiopatología , Prostatitis/fisiopatología , Prostatitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Prostatitis/inmunología , Prostatitis/terapia , Prostatitis/etiología , Enfermedad Crónica , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 5/uso terapéutico , Inflamación/fisiopatología , Inhibidores de 5-alfa-Reductasa/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico
14.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 365, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38822877

RESUMEN

AIM: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of administering double-dose tamsulosin (0.8 mg) for treating patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who have not responded to the standard single dose of tamsulosin (0.4 mg) and are deemed unsuitable for transurethral resection (TUR) intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 2022 and July 2023, we prospectively analyzed 111 patients who were experiencing severe BPH symptoms. These patients received a double dose of tamsulosin for one month. We collected baseline characteristics such as age, body mass index, and underlying medical conditions. Various parameters including the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, prostate volume, peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), voided volume, and post-void residual volume were evaluated before and after treatment. RESULTS: All 111 patients completed the study. The mean age, PSA level, and prostate volume were 63.12 ± 4.83 years, 3.42 ± 0.93 ng/ml, and 50.37 ± 19.23 ml, respectively. Of these patients, 93 showed improvement in Qmax, post-void residual volume, and IPSS score (p-value = 0.001). The total IPSS score and total Qmax improved from 24.03 ± 2.49 and 7.72 ± 1.64 ml/sec to 16.41 ± 3.84 and 12.08 ± 2.37 ml/sec, respectively. CONCLUSION: Double-dose 0.8mg tamsulosin as an alpha-blocker therapy appears to be a viable temporary management option for BPH patients who have not responded to the standard single dose 0.4mg tamsulosin and are not suitable candidates for TUR intervention.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1 , Hiperplasia Prostática , Tamsulosina , Humanos , Tamsulosina/administración & dosificación , Tamsulosina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Esquema de Medicación
15.
Neurology ; 103(2): e209570, 2024 Jul 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38896813

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Terazosin, doxazosin, and alfuzosin (Tz/Dz/Az) are α-1 adrenergic receptor antagonists that also bind to and activate a key adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-producing enzyme in glycolysis. It is hypothesized that the increase in energy availability in the brain may slow or prevent neurodegeneration, potentially by reducing the accumulation of alpha-synuclein. Recent work has suggested a potentially neuroprotective effect of the use of Tz/Dz/Az in Parkinson disease in both animal and human studies. We investigated the neuroprotective effects of Tz/Dz/Az in a closely related disease, dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). METHODS: We used a new-user active comparator design in the Merative Marketscan database to identify men with no history of DLB who were newly started on Tz/Dz/Az or 2 comparator medications. Our comparator medications were other drugs commonly used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia that do not increase ATP: the α-1 adrenergic receptor antagonist tamsulosin or 5α-reductase inhibitor (5ARI). We matched the cohorts on propensity scores and duration of follow-up. We followed up the matched cohorts forward to estimate the hazard of developing DLB using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Men who were newly started on Tz/Dz/Az had a lower hazard of developing DLB than matched men taking tamsulosin (n = 242,716, 728,256 person-years, hazard ratio [HR] 0.60, 95% CI 0.50-0.71) or 5ARI (n = 130,872, 399,316 person-years, HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57-0.93). while the hazard in men taking tamsulosin was similar to that of men taking 5ARI (n = 159,596, 482,280 person-years, HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.96-1.42). These results were robust to several sensitivity analyses. DISCUSSION: We find an association in men who are taking Tz/Dz/Az and a lower hazard of DLB compared with similar men taking other medications. When combined with the literature of Tz/Dz/Az on Parkinson disease, our findings suggest that glycolysis-enhancing drugs may be broadly protective in neurodegenerative synucleinopathies. A future randomized trial is required to assess these associations for causality. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that Tz/Dz/Az use reduces the rate of developing DLB in adult men.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1 , Doxazosina , Enfermedad por Cuerpos de Lewy , Prazosina , Quinazolinas , Humanos , Masculino , Doxazosina/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Prazosina/análogos & derivados , Prazosina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad por Cuerpos de Lewy/tratamiento farmacológico , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico , Quinazolinas/uso terapéutico , Quinazolinas/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Tamsulosina/uso terapéutico , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/farmacología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios de Cohortes
16.
J Pediatr Urol ; 20 Suppl 1: S35-S42, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38906708

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little is known about alpha blocker use in young children, particularly in those with lower urinary tract obstruction (LUTO). Therefore, we aimed to assess the safety and tolerability of selective alpha-blockers in children under 3 years of age with LUTO. METHODS: A prospectively-collected database captured 93 patients born between 12/2005 and 01/2023. Assessed data included baseline characteristics, ultrasound features, blood pressure (BP), side effects and creatinine values. Primary outcome was side effects or discontinuation of alpha-blockers. Secondary outcomes were BP parameters, growth, and kidney function. Data are shown as median with interquartile range (IQR), Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% CI and mean value with standard deviation (SD). RESULTS: A total of 33 patients less than 3 years of age were started on alpha-blockers at 16.8 ± 11.8 months and followed for 48.9 ± 40.5 months. At last follow-up, no significant effect on systolic/diastolic BP percentiles (p > 0.9 and p > 0.9), creatinine levels (p > 0.9). Weight percentiles increased to the last follow-up (37.8 ± 33.2 vs. 53.6 ± 32.9, p = 0.0133) while height percentiles increased from 28 to 100 days to last follow-up (12.9 ± 18.3 vs. 39.6 ± 35.2, p=0.001). Four patients discontinued alpha-blockers; however, no side-effects were reported during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: No severe clinical or systemic side effects were observed, demonstrating safety and tolerability in young children with LUTO. Although alpha-blockers did not significantly improve kidney function in short term follow-up, and failure to thrive was not observed in these children. Additional studies with more patients are required to assess the optimal dosing and timing leading to maximal benefits for these infants.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1 , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Estudios Prospectivos , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/efectos adversos , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios de Seguimiento , Obstrucción Uretral
17.
Pharmacol Rep ; 76(4): 807-822, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38858312

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Apart from antagonizing ß-adrenoceptors, carvedilol antagonizes vascular α1-adrenoceptors and activates G protein-independent signaling. Even though it is a commonly used antihypertensive and α1-adrenoceptors are essential for the treatment of voiding symptoms in benign prostatic hyperplasia, its actions in the human prostate are still unknown. Here, we examined carvedilol effects on contractions of human prostate tissues, and on stromal cell growth. METHODS: Contractions of prostate tissues from radical prostatectomy were induced by electric field stimulation (EFS) or α1-agonists. Growth-related functions were examined in cultured stromal cells. RESULTS: Concentration-response curves for phenylephrine, methoxamine and noradrenaline were right shifted by carvedilol (0.1-10 µM), around half a magnitude with 100 nM, half to one magnitude with 1 µM, and two magnitudes with 10 µM. Right shifts were reflected by increased EC50 values for agonists, with unchanged Emax values. EFS-induced contractions were reduced by 21-54% with 0.01-1 µM carvedilol, and by 94% by 10 µM. Colony numbers of stromal cells were increased by 500 nM, but reduced by 1-10 µM carvedilol, while all concentrations reduced colony size. Decreases in viability were time-dependent with 0.1-0.3 µM, but complete with 10 µM. Proliferation was slightly increased by 0.1-0.5 µM, but reduced with 1-10 µM. CONCLUSIONS: Carvedilol antagonizes α1-adrenoceptors in the human prostate, starting with concentrations in ranges of known plasma levels. In vitro, effect sizes resemble those of α1-blockers used for the treatment of voiding symptoms, which requires concentrations beyond plasma levels. Bidirectional and dynamic effects on the growth of stromal cells may be attributed to "biased agonism".


Asunto(s)
Carvedilol , Proliferación Celular , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Próstata , Células del Estroma , Carvedilol/farmacología , Humanos , Masculino , Células del Estroma/efectos de los fármacos , Células del Estroma/metabolismo , Próstata/efectos de los fármacos , Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Contracción Muscular/efectos de los fármacos , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/farmacología , Células Cultivadas , Estimulación Eléctrica , Norepinefrina/farmacología , Propanolaminas/farmacología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Metoxamina/farmacología , Fenilefrina/farmacología , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Hiperplasia Prostática/patología , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/farmacología , Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/efectos de los fármacos , Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/metabolismo
18.
Cell Physiol Biochem ; 58(3): 212-225, 2024 May 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38852193

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Adrenaline quickly inhibits the release of histamine from mast cells. Besides ß2-adrenergic receptors, several in vitro studies also indicate the involvement of α-adrenergic receptors in the process of exocytosis. Since exocytosis in mast cells can be detected electrophysiologically by the changes in the membrane capacitance (Cm), its continuous monitoring in the presence of drugs would determine their mast cell-stabilizing properties. METHODS: Employing the whole-cell patch-clamp technique in rat peritoneal mast cells, we examined the effects of adrenaline on the degranulation of mast cells and the increase in the Cm during exocytosis. We also examined the degranulation of mast cells in the presence or absence of α-adrenergic receptor agonists or antagonists. RESULTS: Adrenaline dose-dependently suppressed the GTP-γ-S-induced increase in the Cm and inhibited the degranulation from mast cells, which was almost completely erased in the presence of butoxamine, a ß2-adrenergic receptor antagonist. Among α-adrenergic receptor agonists or antagonists, high dose prazosin, a selective α1-adrenergic receptor antagonist, significantly reduced the ratio of degranulating mast cells and suppressed the increase in the Cm. Additionally, prazosin augmented the inhibitory effects of adrenaline on the degranulation of mast cells. CONCLUSION: This study provided electrophysiological evidence for the first time that adrenaline dose-dependently inhibited the process of exocytosis, confirming its usefulness as a potent mast cell-stabilizer. The pharmacological blockade of α1-adrenergic receptor by prazosin synergistically potentiated such mast cell-stabilizing property of adrenaline, which is primarily mediated by ß2-adrenergic receptors.


Asunto(s)
Degranulación de la Célula , Epinefrina , Exocitosis , Mastocitos , Prazosina , Animales , Mastocitos/efectos de los fármacos , Mastocitos/metabolismo , Mastocitos/citología , Epinefrina/farmacología , Ratas , Prazosina/farmacología , Degranulación de la Célula/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Exocitosis/efectos de los fármacos , Técnicas de Placa-Clamp , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/farmacología , Ratas Wistar
19.
J Endourol ; 38(9): 936-947, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38757611

RESUMEN

Introduction: The use of a ureteral access sheath (UAS) during ureteroscopy (URS) has been associated with the risk for ureteral injuries. Preoperative administration of α1-blockers presents a potential mitigator of such lesions by inducing ureteral relaxation, which may also contribute to improving other surgical outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies comparing preoperative α1-blockers administration vs its non-use in adult patients without pre-stenting undergoing URS. Binary outcomes were evaluated using risk ratios (RRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was measured with the Cochran's Q test, I2 statistics, and prediction intervals (PIs). A DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was utilized for all outcomes. Results: Eleven studies encompassing 1074 patients undergoing URS were included, of whom 522 (48.60%) received α1-blockers before the procedure. Preoperative α1-blockers were associated with a reduction in significant ureteral injuries (RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.17-0.53; I2 = 6%; PI 0.10-0.88) and an increase in mean successful UAS insertion (OR 2.14; 95% CI 1.08-4.23; I2 = 23%; PI 0.51-8.93). In patients undergoing exclusively ureteroscopy lithotripsy (URSL), the medications also reduced total complications (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.46-0.84; I2 = 0%) and complications graded Clavien-Dindo III or higher (RR 0.16; 95% CI 0.04-0.69; I2 = 0%), but no significant difference between groups was found in the stone-free rate (RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.86-1.40; I2 = 91%; PI 0.47-2.59). Conclusion: Preoperative α1-blockers were linked to a decrease in significant ureteral injuries with UAS use and fewer complications during URSL procedures. However, their impact on the successful insertion of a UAS remains uncertain. Consideration of administering preoperative α1-blockers in non-stented adult patients undergoing URS with UAS is advisable.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1 , Uréter , Ureteroscopía , Humanos , Ureteroscopía/métodos , Ureteroscopía/efectos adversos , Uréter/cirugía , Uréter/lesiones , Resultado del Tratamiento , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico , Cuidados Preoperatorios
20.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 116(9): 1459-1465, 2024 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38718219

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: α1-Adrenergic receptor antagonists are commonly used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia. Preclinical studies suggest that they induce cell death and inhibit tumor growth. This study evaluated the risk of prostate cancer death in men using α1-adrenergic receptor antagonists. METHODS: A population-based cohort study in Stockholm, Sweden (January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2019) included 451 779 men with a prostate-specific antigen test result. Study entry was 1 year after the first prostate-specific antigen test. Men were considered exposed at their second filled prescription. The primary outcome was prostate cancer mortality. Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and prostate cancer incidence. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all outcomes. Inverse-probability weighting with marginal structural models accounted for time-dependent confounders. RESULTS: Of 351 297 men in the final cohort, 39 856 (11.3%) were exposed to α1-adrenergic receptor antagonists. Median (interquartile range) follow-up for prostate cancer mortality was 8.9 (5.1-10.9) years; median (interquartile range) exposure time to α1-adrenergic receptor antagonists was 4.4 (2.0-7.6) years. There was no evidence of an association between α1-adrenergic receptor antagonist use and prostate cancer mortality, all-cause mortality, or high-grade prostate cancer. α1-Adrenergic receptor antagonist use was associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer (HR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.17) and low-grade prostate cancer (HR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.11 to 1.33). Men whose prostate cancer was treated with α1-adrenergic receptor antagonists underwent more frequent prostate-specific antigen testing. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show no significant association between α1-adrenergic receptor adrenoceptor antagonist exposure and prostate cancer mortality or high-grade prostate cancer. Although the preclinical evidence indicates a potential chemopreventive effect, this study's findings do not support it.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1 , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Suecia/epidemiología , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Estudios de Cohortes , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Hiperplasia Prostática/mortalidad , Hiperplasia Prostática/epidemiología , Estudios de Seguimiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA