Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 4.750
Filtrar
1.
Psychiatr Pol ; 58(2): 223-236, 2024 Apr 30.
Artículo en Inglés, Polaco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39003507

RESUMEN

This year, we observe sixty's anniversary of the article by a British psychiatrist, Geoffrey Hartigan, demonstrating, for the first time, the possibility of preventing of the recurrence of mood disorders by using lithium salts. Herein, a history of prevention of recurrences of mood disorders both worldwide and in Poland will be presented concerning both lithium and other mood-stabilizing drugs. The merit for verifying the prophylactic lithium effect in the 1960-1970s should be given to Danish researchers, Mogens Schou and Poul Baastrup. In Poland, the first paper on prophylactic lithium appeared already in 1971. In the 1970s, French researchers showed prophylactic activity of valproic acid amide, and Japanese researchers - carbamazepine. In the 1980th, studies on valproic acid amide were performed in the 2nd Psychiatric Clinic of the Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology led by Prof. Puzynski. Since the mid-1990s, 2nd generation of mood-stabilizing drugs has been introduced, including some atypical antipsychotics (clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole, risperidone) and anticonvulsant drug, lamotrigine, showing prophylactic activity in bipolar mood disorder. The studies on lithium resulted in the identification of factors connected with its prophylactic efficacy as well as the antisuicidal, antiviral, and neuroprotective effects of this drug. From a sixty-year perspective following Hartigan's article, it seems that his pioneering concept on the possibility of pharmacological influence on the course of mood disorders was fully confirmed. Current Polish recommendations on pharmacological prophylaxis of mood disorders were presented in the books "Standardy leczenia niektórych zaburzen psychicznych" and "Psychofarmakologia kliniczna", both published in 2022.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Trastornos del Humor , Humanos , Antimaníacos/uso terapéutico , Antimaníacos/historia , Antipsicóticos/historia , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Bipolar/prevención & control , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Bipolar/historia , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Compuestos de Litio/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Litio/historia , Trastornos del Humor/prevención & control , Trastornos del Humor/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos del Humor/historia , Polonia , Prevención Secundaria
2.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 44(4): 407-412, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38901001

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Psychotic bipolar depression (PBD) is a prevalent yet understudied psychiatric illness, and there are no specific guidelines or Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for its treatment. Recent studies suggest that some antipsychotics and mood stabilizers may be effective in managing bipolar depression; however, their effectiveness for PBD remains unclear. Given the urgent need for more focused research for managing PBD, we conducted a literature review to summarize the existing literature on PBD. METHODS: We conducted an electronic literature search from the 1960s to 2023, utilizing PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google, and selected studies based on their relevance to PBD. FINDINGS: PBD is a complex disorder, with 50%-75% of patients with bipolar disorder exhibiting psychotic features. This likelihood increases among those with a history of psychotic mania. Treatment guidelines often recommend a combination of mood stabilizers, antipsychotics, or electroconvulsive therapy, but they do not specify a first-line treatment. PBD symptoms can be masked by mixed high mood and energy feelings, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment while increasing suicide risk. Limited research has evaluated outcomes of various treatments for PBD, and despite the lack of evidence for superior efficacy, in clinical practice, antipsychotics are frequently prescribed. Notably, combining an antipsychotic with selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors or tricyclic antidepressants may be effective, but including a mood stabilizer is necessary. CONCLUSION: PBD poses a significant challenge in mental health due to its severity and the lack of consensus on optimal treatment approaches. There is a critical need for more dedicated clinical trials and research to answer key questions about the effective treatment of acute PBD, ideal follow-up care, traits of responders to different therapies, and decision models for subsequent treatments.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Trastorno Bipolar , Humanos , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Electroconvulsiva , Antimaníacos/uso terapéutico , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico
3.
Turk Psikiyatri Derg ; 35(2): 150-155, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés, Turco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38842156

RESUMEN

Lithium may cause toxicity as it has a narrow therapeutic range. Lithium intoxication may manifest in the form of acute, acute on chronic and chronic intoxication. Neurotoxicity is a common component of chronic lithium intoxication and the symptoms include tremor, ataxia, dysarthria, extrapyramidal symptoms, hyperreflexia, seizures and status epilepticus. Although rare, catatonia could as a manifestation of lithium neurotoxicity. In this report, we present a patient with bipolar disorder presenting with catatonic symptoms secondary to lithium intoxication. We will discuss the risk factors, differential diagnosis and the treatment of catatonic symptoms. Lithium neurotoxicity may present with various clinical symptoms including catatonia, and differential diagnosis should be made well in such cases. If lithium neurotoxicity is suspected, rapid and appropriate intervention is required to prevent permanent neurological damage. Keywords: Lithium, Neurotoxicity, Catatonia.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Catatonia , Humanos , Antimaníacos/efectos adversos , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Catatonia/inducido químicamente , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/etiología , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/diagnóstico
8.
Ther Drug Monit ; 46(3): 281-284, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38723114

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: This is a case description of a patient with bipolar disorder undergoing lithium therapy who received plasmapheresis for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Plasmapheresis resulted in lower and subtherapeutic serum lithium levels. Using therapeutic drug monitoring, a dose escalation of 80% was necessary to maintain therapeutic serum lithium levels. This underscores the importance of individualized therapy through therapeutic drug monitoring.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Monitoreo de Drogas , Neuromielitis Óptica , Plasmaféresis , Humanos , Antimaníacos/uso terapéutico , Antimaníacos/sangre , Trastorno Bipolar/terapia , Trastorno Bipolar/sangre , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Litio/sangre , Litio/uso terapéutico , Neuromielitis Óptica/terapia , Neuromielitis Óptica/sangre , Plasmaféresis/métodos
9.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 44(4): 418-423, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743015

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Published studies on the association between lithium use and the decreased risk of major neurocognitive disorders (MNCDs) have shown disparities in their conclusions. We aimed to provide updated evidence of this association. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from inception until August 31, 2023. All the observational studies evaluating the association between lithium use and MNCD risk were eligible for inclusion. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% prediction intervals were computed using random-effects models. RESULTS: Eight studies with 377,060 subjects were included in the analysis. In the general population on the association between lithium use versus nonuse and dementia, the OR was 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.77-1.24). Further analysis also demonstrated that lithium use was not associated with an increased risk of Alzheimer's disease (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.31-1.65). When the analysis was restricted to individuals with bipolar disorder to reduce the confounding by clinical indication, lithium exposure was also not associated with a decreased risk of MNCD (OR = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.71-1.15). CONCLUSION: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis do not support a significant association between lithium use and the risk of MNCD.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Compuestos de Litio , Humanos , Compuestos de Litio/efectos adversos , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Bipolar/inducido químicamente , Trastornos Neurocognitivos/inducido químicamente , Trastornos Neurocognitivos/epidemiología , Antimaníacos/efectos adversos , Litio/efectos adversos
10.
J Affect Disord ; 360: 139-145, 2024 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38810780

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lithium is an effective mood stabiliser, but its mechanism of action is incompletely defined. Even at very low doses, lithium may have neuroprotective effects, but it is not clear if these relate to brain lithium concentration in vivo. We have developed magnetic resonance imaging (7Li-MRI) methods to detect lithium in the brain following supplementation at a very low dose. METHODS: Lithium orotate supplements were taken by nine healthy adult male subjects (5 mg daily) for up to 28 days, providing 2-7 % of the lithium content of a typical therapeutic lithium carbonate dose. One-dimensional 7Li-images were acquired on a 3.0 T MRI scanner. All subjects were scanned on day 14 or 28; seven were scanned on both, one at baseline and one after 7-days washout. RESULTS: 7Li-MR signal amplitude was broadly stable between days 14 and 28. Two subjects had notably higher 7Li-signal intensities (approximately 2-4×) compared to other study participants. LIMITATIONS: Lithium adherence was self-reported by all participants without formal validation. The coarse spatial resolution necessary for detection of low concentrations of 7Li exhibits imperfect spatial separation of signal from adjacent pixels. CONCLUSIONS: 7Li-MRI performed using a clinical 3T scanner demonstrated detection of lithium in the brain at very low concentration, in the range of approximately 10-60 mM. The methods are suited to studies assessing low dose lithium administration in psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders, and permit the comparison of different lithium salt preparations at a time of emerging interest in the field.


Asunto(s)
Encéfalo , Suplementos Dietéticos , Carbonato de Litio , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Encéfalo/efectos de los fármacos , Carbonato de Litio/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven , Voluntarios Sanos , Antimaníacos/administración & dosificación
11.
Transl Psychiatry ; 14(1): 211, 2024 May 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38802372

RESUMEN

Lamotrigine is an effective mood stabiliser, largely used for the management and prevention of depression in bipolar disorder. The neuropsychological mechanisms by which lamotrigine acts to relieve symptoms as well as its neural effects on emotional processing remain unclear. The primary objective of this current study was to investigate the impact of an acute dose of lamotrigine on the neural response to a well-characterised fMRI task probing implicit emotional processing relevant to negative bias. 31 healthy participants were administered either a single dose of lamotrigine (300 mg, n = 14) or placebo (n = 17) in a randomized, double-blind design. Inside the 3 T MRI scanner, participants completed a covert emotional faces gender discrimination task. Brain activations showing significant group differences were identified using voxel-wise general linear model (GLM) nonparametric permutation testing, with threshold free cluster enhancement (TFCE) and a family wise error (FWE)-corrected cluster significance threshold of p < 0.05. Participants receiving lamotrigine were more accurate at identifying the gender of fearful (but not happy or angry) faces. A network of regions associated with emotional processing, including amygdala, insula, and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), was significantly less activated in the lamotrigine group compared to the placebo group across emotional facial expressions. A single dose of lamotrigine reduced activation in limbic areas in response to faces with both positive and negative expressions, suggesting a valence-independent effect. However, at a behavioural level lamotrigine appeared to reduce the distracting effect of fear on face discrimination. Such effects may be relevant to the mood stabilisation effects of lamotrigine.


Asunto(s)
Emociones , Expresión Facial , Voluntarios Sanos , Lamotrigina , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Triazinas , Humanos , Lamotrigina/farmacología , Lamotrigina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Emociones/efectos de los fármacos , Triazinas/farmacología , Triazinas/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven , Encéfalo/efectos de los fármacos , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Reconocimiento Facial/efectos de los fármacos , Giro del Cíngulo/efectos de los fármacos , Giro del Cíngulo/diagnóstico por imagen , Amígdala del Cerebelo/efectos de los fármacos , Amígdala del Cerebelo/diagnóstico por imagen , Antimaníacos/farmacología , Antimaníacos/administración & dosificación
12.
Dan Med J ; 71(5)2024 Apr 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704837

RESUMEN

Current evidence for pharmacological treatment of mania during hospitalisation is insufficient as there are no larger well-designed randomised trials of comparative medical treatments of mania during inpatient stays. Moreover, there is considerable variation in pharmacological medication in clinical practice during hospitalisation for mania. Based on a hospital data overview, a systematic search of the literature and a three-day consensus meeting, this narrative review proposed an algorithm for optimised pharmacological treatment of mania during hospitalisation and its subsequent scientific evaluation.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Hospitalización , Manía , Humanos , Manía/tratamiento farmacológico , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Antimaníacos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Bipolar/terapia
13.
J Affect Disord ; 358: 416-421, 2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38735581

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic response to lithium in patients with bipolar disorder is highly variable and has a polygenic basis. Genome-wide association studies investigating lithium response have identified several relevant loci, though the precise mechanisms driving these associations are poorly understood. We aimed to prioritise the most likely effector gene and determine the mechanisms underlying an intergenic lithium response locus on chromosome 21 identified by the International Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLi+Gen). METHODS: We conducted in-silico functional analyses by integrating and synthesising information from several publicly available functional genetic datasets and databases including the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project and HaploReg. RESULTS: The findings from this study highlighted TMPRSS15 as the most likely effector gene at the ConLi+Gen lithium response locus. TMPRSS15 encodes enterokinase, a gastrointestinal enzyme responsible for converting trypsinogen into trypsin and thus aiding digestion. Convergent findings from gene-based lookups in human and mouse databases as well as co-expression network analyses of small intestinal RNA-seq data (GTEx) implicated TMPRSS15 in the regulation of intestinal nutrient absorption, including ions like sodium and potassium, which may extend to lithium. LIMITATIONS: Although the findings from this study indicated that TMPRSS15 was the most likely effector gene at the ConLi+Gen lithium response locus, the evidence was circumstantial. Thus, the conclusions from this study need to be validated in appropriately designed wet-lab studies. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study are consistent with a model whereby TMPRSS15 impacts the efficacy of lithium treatment in patients with bipolar disorder by modulating intestinal lithium absorption.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Simulación por Computador , Absorción Intestinal , Serina Endopeptidasas , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Bipolar/genética , Trastorno Bipolar/metabolismo , Humanos , Absorción Intestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Serina Endopeptidasas/genética , Serina Endopeptidasas/metabolismo , Ratones , Animales , Proteínas de la Membrana/genética , Proteínas de la Membrana/metabolismo , Litio/uso terapéutico , Litio/farmacología , Antimaníacos/farmacología , Antimaníacos/uso terapéutico , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Compuestos de Litio/farmacología , Compuestos de Litio/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Litio/farmacocinética
14.
Pharmacol Rev ; 76(3): 323-357, 2024 May 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38697859

RESUMEN

Over the last six decades, lithium has been considered the gold standard treatment for the long-term management of bipolar disorder due to its efficacy in preventing both manic and depressive episodes as well as suicidal behaviors. Nevertheless, despite numerous observed effects on various cellular pathways and biologic systems, the precise mechanism through which lithium stabilizes mood remains elusive. Furthermore, there is recent support for the therapeutic potential of lithium in other brain diseases. This review offers a comprehensive examination of contemporary understanding and predominant theories concerning the diverse mechanisms underlying lithium's effects. These findings are based on investigations utilizing cellular and animal models of neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders. Recent studies have provided additional support for the significance of glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3) inhibition as a crucial mechanism. Furthermore, research has shed more light on the interconnections between GSK3-mediated neuroprotective, antioxidant, and neuroplasticity processes. Moreover, recent advancements in animal and human models have provided valuable insights into how lithium-induced modifications at the homeostatic synaptic plasticity level may play a pivotal role in its clinical effectiveness. We focused on findings from translational studies suggesting that lithium may interface with microRNA expression. Finally, we are exploring the repurposing potential of lithium beyond bipolar disorder. These recent findings on the therapeutic mechanisms of lithium have provided important clues toward developing predictive models of response to lithium treatment and identifying new biologic targets. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Lithium is the drug of choice for the treatment of bipolar disorder, but its mechanism of action in stabilizing mood remains elusive. This review presents the latest evidence on lithium's various mechanisms of action. Recent evidence has strengthened glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3) inhibition, changes at the level of homeostatic synaptic plasticity, and regulation of microRNA expression as key mechanisms, providing an intriguing perspective that may help bridge the mechanistic gap between molecular functions and its clinical efficacy as a mood stabilizer.


Asunto(s)
Compuestos de Litio , Humanos , Animales , Compuestos de Litio/farmacología , Compuestos de Litio/uso terapéutico , Antimaníacos/farmacología , Antimaníacos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Plasticidad Neuronal/efectos de los fármacos , Glucógeno Sintasa Quinasa 3/metabolismo , Glucógeno Sintasa Quinasa 3/antagonistas & inhibidores
15.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci ; 33: e31, 2024 May 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38779809

RESUMEN

AIMS: Accumulating studies have assessed mortality risk associated with mood-stabilizers, the mainstay treatment for bipolar disorder (BD). However, existing data were mostly restricted to suicide risk, focused on lithium and valproate and rarely adequately adjusted for potential confounders. This study aimed to assess comparative mortality risk with all, natural and unnatural causes between lithium, valproate and three frequently prescribed second-generation antipsychotics (SGA), with adjustment for important confounders. METHODS: This population-based cohort study identified 8137 patients with first-diagnosed BD, who had exposed to lithium (n = 1028), valproate (n = 3580), olanzapine (n = 797), quetiapine (n = 1975) or risperidone (n = 757) between 2002 and 2018. Data were retrieved from territory-wide medical-record database of public healthcare services in Hong Kong. Propensity-score (PS)-weighting method was applied to optimize control for potential confounders including pre-existing chronic physical diseases, substance/alcohol use disorders and other psychotropic medications. PS-weighted Cox proportional-hazards regression was conducted to assess risk of all-, natural- and unnatural-cause mortality related to each mood-stabilizer, compared to lithium. Three sets of sensitivity analyses were conducted by restricting to patients with (i) length of cumulative exposure to specified mood-stabilizer ≥90 days and its medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥90%, (ii) MPR of specified mood-stabilizer ≥80% and MPR of other studied mood-stabilizers <20% and (iii) monotherapy. RESULTS: Incidence rates of all-cause mortality per 1000 person-years were 5.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.5-7.6), 8.4 (7.4-9.5), 11.1 (8.3-14.9), 7.4 (6.0-9.2) and 12.0 (9.3-15.6) for lithium-, valproate-, olanzapine-, quetiapine- and risperidone-treated groups, respectively. BD patients treated with olanzapine (PS-weighted hazard ratio = 2.07 [95% CI: 1.33-3.22]) and risperidone (1.66 [1.08-2.55]) had significantly higher all-cause mortality rate than lithium-treated group. Olanzapine was associated with increased risk of natural-cause mortality (3.04 [1.54-6.00]) and risperidone was related to elevated risk of unnatural-cause mortality (3.33 [1.62-6.86]), relative to lithium. The association between olanzapine and increased natural-cause mortality rate was consistently affirmed in sensitivity analyses. Relationship between risperidone and elevated unnatural-cause mortality became non-significant in sensitivity analyses restricted to low MPR in other mood-stabilizers and monotherapy. Valproate- and lithium-treated groups did not show significant differences in all-, natural- or unnatural-cause mortality risk. CONCLUSION: Our data showed that olanzapine and risperidone were associated with higher mortality risk than lithium, and further supported the clinical guidelines recommending lithium as the first-line mood-stabilizer for BD. Future research is required to further clarify comparative mortality risk associated with individual SGA agents to facilitate risk-benefit evaluation of alternative mood-stabilizers to minimize avoidable premature mortality in BD.


Asunto(s)
Antimaníacos , Antipsicóticos , Trastorno Bipolar , Puntaje de Propensión , Fumarato de Quetiapina , Ácido Valproico , Humanos , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Bipolar/mortalidad , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéutico , Antimaníacos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Fumarato de Quetiapina/uso terapéutico , Fumarato de Quetiapina/efectos adversos , Olanzapina/uso terapéutico , Hong Kong/epidemiología , Risperidona/uso terapéutico , Risperidona/efectos adversos , Litio/uso terapéutico , Causas de Muerte
17.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 44(4): 345-352, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38639433

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety profile of lurasidone combined with either lithium or valproate, in the short-term treatment of patients with bipolar depression. METHODS: Data were pooled from two 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of patients with bipolar depression on stable doses of lithium or valproate randomized to lurasidone (20-120 mg/d) or placebo. Efficacy measures included the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impressions Bipolar Scale, and the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology via self-assessment and were analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures approach. RESULTS: Notably larger week 6 effect sizes were observed when lurasidone was added to lithium, compared with when lurasidone was added to valproate, on 2 of the 3 depression outcome measures, Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score (d = 0.45 vs 0.22) and Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology via self-assessment (d = 0.63 vs 0.29); the efficacy advantage was smaller on the Clinical Global Impressions Bipolar Scale depression score (d = 0.34 vs 0.29). Similar adverse event profiles were observed for lurasidone treatment in combination with either lithium or valproate. The most frequently reported events (≥5%) in both groups were nausea, parkinsonism, somnolence, akathisia, and insomnia. Minimal changes in weight, lipids, and measures of glycemic control were observed during treatment with lurasidone combined with either lithium or valproate. CONCLUSIONS: Lurasidone added to either lithium or valproate was found to be an effective treatment for bipolar depression, with a larger antidepressant effect observed when lurasidone was combined with lithium. There were no clinically meaningful differences in the safety or tolerability of lurasidone when used adjunctively with lithium or valproate.


Asunto(s)
Antimaníacos , Trastorno Bipolar , Quimioterapia Combinada , Clorhidrato de Lurasidona , Ácido Valproico , Humanos , Clorhidrato de Lurasidona/administración & dosificación , Clorhidrato de Lurasidona/efectos adversos , Clorhidrato de Lurasidona/farmacología , Clorhidrato de Lurasidona/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Ácido Valproico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Valproico/efectos adversos , Ácido Valproico/farmacología , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Antimaníacos/administración & dosificación , Antimaníacos/efectos adversos , Antimaníacos/farmacología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Antipsicóticos/farmacología , Compuestos de Litio/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Litio/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Litio/farmacología , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica
18.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 150(2): 91-104, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38643982

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine whether the clinical profiles of bipolar disorder (BD) patients could be differentiated more clearly using the existing classification by diagnostic subtype or by lithium treatment responsiveness. METHODS: We included adult patients with BD-I or II (N = 477 across four sites) who were treated with lithium as their principal mood stabilizer for at least 1 year. Treatment responsiveness was defined using the dichotomized Alda score. We performed hierarchical clustering on phenotypes defined by 40 features, covering demographics, clinical course, family history, suicide behaviour, and comorbid conditions. We then measured the amount of information that inferred clusters carried about (A) BD subtype and (B) lithium responsiveness using adjusted mutual information (AMI) scores. Detailed phenotypic profiles across clusters were then evaluated with univariate comparisons. RESULTS: Two clusters were identified (n = 56 and n = 421), which captured significantly more information about lithium responsiveness (AMI range: 0.033 to 0.133) than BD subtype (AMI: 0.004 to 0.011). The smaller cluster had disproportionately more lithium responders (n = 47 [83.8%]) when compared to the larger cluster (103 [24.4%]; p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Phenotypes derived from detailed clinical data may carry more information about lithium responsiveness than the current classification of diagnostic subtype. These findings support lithium responsiveness as a valid approach to stratification in clinical samples.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Compuestos de Litio , Fenotipo , Humanos , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Bipolar/clasificación , Trastorno Bipolar/diagnóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis por Conglomerados , Compuestos de Litio/farmacología , Compuestos de Litio/uso terapéutico , Antimaníacos/uso terapéutico , Antimaníacos/farmacología
19.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 84: 48-56, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38663126

RESUMEN

Bipolar disorder is associated with increased rates of many physical disorders, but the effects of medication are unclear. We systematically investigated the associations between sustained use of first line maintenance agents, lithium versus lamotrigine and valproate, and the risk of physical disorders using a nation-wide population-based target trial emulation covering the entire 5.9 million inhabitants in Denmark. We identified two cohorts. Cohort 1: patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder prior to first purchase (N = 12.607). Cohort 2: all 156.678 adult patients who had their first ever purchase (since 1995) of either lithium, lamotrigine or valproate between 1997 and 2021 regardless of diagnosis. Main analyses investigated the effect of sustained exposure defined as exposure for all consecutive 6-months periods during a 10-year follow-up. Outcomes included a diagnosis of incident stroke, arteriosclerosis, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, myxedema, osteoporosis, dementia, Parkinson's disease, chronic kidney disease and cancer (including subtypes). In both Cohorts 1 and 2, there were no systematic statistically significant differences in associations between sustained use of lithium versus lamotrigine and valproate, respectively, and any physical disorder, including subtypes of disorders, except myxedema, for which exposure to lithium increased the absolute risk of myxedema with 7-10 % compared with lamotrigine or valproate. In conclusion, these analyses emulating a target trial of "real world" observational register-based data show that lithium does not increase the risk of developing any kind of physical disorders, except myxedema, which may be a result of detection bias.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes , Trastorno Bipolar , Lamotrigina , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Bipolar/epidemiología , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Lamotrigina/efectos adversos , Lamotrigina/uso terapéutico , Antimaníacos/efectos adversos , Antimaníacos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Compuestos de Litio/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Litio/uso terapéutico , Ácido Valproico/efectos adversos , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéutico
20.
Asia Pac Psychiatry ; 16(2): e12555, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38565831

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The debate about observing total versus free serum valproate levels for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been unresolved for decades. This study was planned to assess the agreement between the total versus free valproate levels and the advantage of one method over the other in TDM. METHODS: The present cross-sectional study was done on 93 patients with bipolar disorder. The intraclass correlation coefficient, Bland Altman analysis, and Lin's concordance analysis were done to assess the agreement between the total and free valproate concentrations. Linear and polynomial models were constructed to evaluate the relation between the two measurements. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was done to compare the accuracy for differentiating remission from non-remission on Young's mania rating scale (YMRS). RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient were 0.491 (p = .002) and 0.055 (95% CI:0.037, 0.073), respectively. Bland Altman's analysis showed proportional bias. A polynomial model of second order was found to be the best fit for the prediction of free valproate from the data for total valproate, and 81.4% of the variability in free valproate could be explained when adjusted for albumin levels. The area under the curve for total valproate was 0.60 when compared to free valproate 0.56 for differentiating between remission and non-remission, but the comparison between the two ROC analyses was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Free valproate does not provide any added advantage over the total valproate levels; hence, total valproate levels may continue to be used as the marker for drug monitoring.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Ácido Valproico , Humanos , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Monitoreo de Drogas , Estudios Transversales , Antimaníacos/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA