A Retrospective Review of Anthralin in Petrolatum in the Treatment of Alopecia Areata in the Pediatric Population.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Alopecia areata (AA) is a T-cell driven autoimmune disease, which results in hair loss. This study aims to determine the efficacy, tolerability and safety of different concentrations of anthralin in the treatment of pediatric AA. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients < 18 yo diagnosed with AA treated with anthralin at SickKids Hospital, Toronto dermatology outpatient clinic in 2016 - 2018. Anthralin used at 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.5% and 1% in petrolatum at short contact, at increments of 15 minutes every week until a 1 hr maximum contact achieved. No other treatment was used in conjunction. Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) scores (SS) were determined using photographs and descriptions to assess severity of alopecia at baseline and post anthralin treatment. RESULTS: A total of 11 charts were reviewed in this retrospective cohort. Hair loss pattern; 3 patients with patchy, 6 had mixed (patchy and ophiasis), and 2 were totalis. All except for 1 patient had failed traditional treatments. One patient had complete hair regrowth, 3 showed more than 85% hair re-growth and 7 patients showed more than 75% hair regrowth, the average time for this to occur was 6.5 months. None of the patients experience serious side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated the efficacy and tolerability of topical anthralin 0.1% to 1% in pediatric alopecia areata. In our study, anthralin 0.2% appears to offer the best performance and tolerability profile among the different concentrations used, with treatment course of at least 6 months in order to achieve more than 75% hair regrowth.

A systematic review on the treatment of pediatric severe alopecia areata by topical immunotherapy or Anthralin (contact sensitization) or low-level light/laser therapy (LLLT): focus on efficacy, safety, treatment duration, recurrence, and follow-up based on clinical studies.

INTRODUCTION: Alopecia areata (AA) in its extensive and severe forms is treatment-challenging, especially in pediatrics. METHOD: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review of seven electronic databases was searched by the terms "alopecia areata," "pediatric," "topical immunotherapy," "Anthralin," and "light therapy" from inception until March 2021. All the alternative names of the disease and therapies have been included in the search terms. 790 articles went to title abstract review by two independent reviewers. In the subsequent level, a review of the full text of studies was conducted. RESULTS: Finally, 10 relevant articles in terms of content structure, subject coverage, and purpose, were selected for further review. The highest percentages of complete hair regrowth were 79.6% and 63.61% by SADBE (topical immunotherapy) and laser therapy. By Anthralin (contact sensitization), the complete response rate was below 50% (between 30 and 35%). Regarding average response, the most effective methods were local immunotherapy (with an average effectiveness of 53.8%), laser therapy (52.55%), and the use of Anthralin-induced contact dermatitis (30.86%), respectively. However, recurrence rate-after treatment with induced contact dermatitis by topical medications like Anthralin (contact sensitization)-was lower (mean 43.53%) in comparison with local immunotherapy (57%). In topical immunotherapy, light base therapy, and contact sensitization, the highest percentage of complete hair regrowth and the average response rate were (63.61% and 52.55%), (79.6% and 53.8%) and (32% and 30.8%), respectively. These methods are considered safe in children. CONCLUSION: A high and more than 50% efficacy in hair regrowth could be expected by topical immunotherapy and light/laser therapy method. No serious side effects have been observed by these methods that are well tolerated in children. Therefore, a combination of local immunotherapy and light/laser therapy could be suggested for the treatment of extensive AA in children. The use of Anthralin could be associated with a lower but more durable response. These points are important for patient selection in individualized situations.

A randomized trial of diphenylcyclopropenone (DPCP) combined with anthralin versus DPCP alone for treating moderate to severe alopecia areata.

BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic autoimmune disorder. Finding the best treatment regimen for it remains a challenge. Currently, one of the best documented treatment modalities for AA is topical immunotherapy. AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of combined DPCP and anthralin versus standard protocol (DPCP alone). METHODS: A prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted on 50 patients with Alopecia areata who received DPCP alone (group D) or in combination with anthralin (group D/A). Percentage of hair regrowth after 6 months of treatment and the incidence of drug-related adverse effects were evaluated and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Complete hair regrowth was observed among three patients in each group (18.75% in Group D and 15.79% in Group D/A) after 6 months. Moreover, 25% and 31% of patients in group D and 21% and 47% of patients in group D/A had > 75% and > 50% hair regrowth respectively at the end of the study (P-value: 0.696). In addition, earlier age of onset, chronicity of lesions, nail involvement, facial hair loss and extensive lesions at baseline were associated with poor clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: DPCP and anthralin was as effective as DPCP alone and anthralin did not add to the effect of DPCP in treating AA.

Dithranol: An Insight into its Novel Delivery Cargos for Psoriasis Management.

OBJECTIVE: Dithranol (DTH) is a well-known moiety that has long been used promisingly to impede and treat skin disorders, particularly psoriasis. Nowadays, a rekindled interest in the use of DTH for this disorder has been observed. Side effects associated with conventional topical formulations of this moiety have aroused the interest of the scientific community in investigating novel cargos of DTH for psoriasis management. RESULTS: Previous research has evidenced the anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferating potential of DTH. Numerous studies have indicated that DTH inhibits polymorphonuclear (PMN) leucocyte, modulates epidermal cell receptors and promotes anti-psoriatic action. However, some deterrent factors like poor solubility, stability, toxicity, staining and skin irritation hamper its use as a potential therapeutic agent. With the adoption of novel drug delivery technologies, the above mentioned inherent limitations of DTH have been compensated to reestablish this drug moiety. CONCLUSION: This article reviews novel drug delivery aspects, safety concerns, clinical evidence, current status, and future opportunities of DTH in the management of psoriasis. Further, it will update researchers on this promising drug moiety, which is free from systemic adverse responses in comparison to other therapeutic molecules like steroids, for psoriasis treatment.

Efficacy and safety of anthralin in combination with diphenylcyclopropenone in the treatment of alopecia areata: a retrospective case series.

Contact immunotherapy with diphenylcyclopropenone (DPCP) and anthralin is considered the treatment option for extensive alopecia areata (AA) unresponsive to DPCP immunotherapy alone. Only one study has described the efficacy of combination therapy; therefore, we investigated whether topical DPCP and anthralin can promote hair regrowth in DPCP-non responders. In this retrospective case-series we analyzed the efficacy and side effects of DPCP with anthralin in AA patients who did not respond to several months of treatment with DPCP alone. Thirty-two DPCP-nonresponsive AA patients were treated with DPCP and anthralin for the average of 8.3 ± 3.8 (3-17) months. During the treatment, 40.62% of patients (13 patients out of 32) had terminal hair regrowth. The mean of hair regrowth rate was 41%; it was mainly as partial hair regrowth (˂ 50%) and 27.27% of cases achieved > 50% terminal hair regrowth. Treatment response strongly related to the duration of combination therapy (p value ˂ 0.001), but we did not find any relation with other demographic characteristics. The first signs of response to treatment were noticed 2-12 months (5.5 ± 3.4) after initiation of combination therapy while there was a positive correlation among the duration of treatment and percentage of hair regrowth (p < 0.001). The most common complication was bullae (25%), and the least frequent side effect was generalized pruritus (3.1%). The combination therapy with DPCP and anthralin could be effective to treat DPCP non-responder AA patients. Additionally, the higher treatment response could be achieved by longer treatment duration.

Use of topical therapies for pediatric psoriasis: A systematic review.

Psoriasis is one of the most common chronic skin diseases, affecting 1%-3% of the general population. It can have a significant negative impact on a patient's quality of life, and in approximately 30% of patients first symptoms can be traced back to childhood. We have performed a comprehensive literature search using the MEDLINE database in order to ascertain the efficacy and adverse reactions of topical treatments in pediatric psoriasis. A total of 13 relevant articles were identified on the following topical agents: corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, vitamin D analogs, and dithranol. Corticosteroids achieved clearance in 72.7% of patients. Calcitriol lead to a 57.2%-100% mean improvement in severity, and calcipotriol to 52%-64%. Combination of calcipotriol and corticosteroids achieved an improvement in mean severity ranging between 32.1% and 80%. Treatment with tacrolimus lead to an >50% improvement. Finally, short contact dithranol lead to a variable response in clearance between different studies, ranging between 3.7% and 81%. No serious adverse reactions were documented, the most common local reaction being irritation. Pediatric psoriasis is a common and challenging condition with no easy and definitive solution. Topical agents are safe, easy to use, readily available and cheap. However, they need to be applied repeatedly, may cause skin irritation, and can be messy. Based on the results presented above, we recommend utilizing all the available topical options before escalating to systemic treatments.

Efficacy and safety of diphenylcyclopropenone alone or in combination with anthralin in the treatment of chronic extensive alopecia areata: a retrospective case series.

BACKGROUND: Some patients with chronic extensive alopecia areata (AA) may be refractory to topical immunotherapy. Combination therapy is recommended for such patients. Efficacy and safety of a combination therapy with diphenylcyclopropenone (DPCP) and anthralin in chronic extensive AA is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether the combination therapy of DPCP and anthralin is superior to DPCP alone in chronic extensive AA. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy, side effects, and relapse rates of DPCP (alone or with anthralin) in chronic extensive AA. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients (22 were treated only with DPCP, and 25 with DPCP and anthralin for at least 30 weeks) were evaluated. Complete hair regrowth was observed in 36.4% and 72% of the patients who received DPCP and combination therapy, respectively (P = .01). Hair regrowth duration was shorter with combination therapy (P = .01). Regrowth rates of the eyebrows, eyelashes, and beard in patients on combination therapy were higher than those in patients on DPCP (P = .01). Side effects such as folliculitis, hyperpigmentation, and staining of skin, hair, and clothes were more common in combination therapy group. LIMITATIONS: The retrospective design and small number of patients are limitations. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with DPCP and anthralin is superior to DPCP alone in chronic extensive AA.

The effectiveness and safety of short-contact dithranol therapy in paediatric psoriasis: a prospective comparison of regular day care and day care with telemedicine.

BACKGROUND: Evidence on the effectiveness and safety of short-contact dithranol therapy in paediatric psoriasis is sparse and based only on retrospective data. The best results are achieved in a time-consuming day-care setting. OBJECTIVES: To study prospectively the effectiveness and safety of short-contact dithranol therapy in paediatric psoriasis. In addition, the effectiveness, safety, duration of treatment and number of visits between regular day care and day care with telemedicine were compared. METHODS: Data were collected from the prospective observational Child-CAPTURE registry of children with psoriasis. Effectiveness was measured as the mean percentage improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). Safety was assessed by recording adverse events. The number of visits and duration of treatment were reported. RESULTS: For all patients a mean percentage reduction in PASI score of -69·3% was found, with no significant differences between regular day care and day care with telemedicine. The only adverse event reported was irritation of the skin. Neither the frequency of irritation during treatment nor the mean duration of treatment significantly differed between the two groups. Patients with telemedicine had significantly fewer visits. CONCLUSIONS: This first prospective observational study demonstrates that short-contact dithranol therapy in paediatric psoriasis is effective and safe. Regular day care and day care with telemedicine are equally effective. Telemedicine can be of additional value as it is less time consuming. We hope it will therefore make dithranol treatment appropriate for a larger number of children with psoriasis.

An investigation of the effects of dithranol-induced apoptosis in a human keratinocyte cell line.

OBJECTIVES: Dithranol, one of the most successful topical agents for the treatment of psoriasis, has been shown to exert its therapeutic effect by inducing keratinocyte apoptosis. To gain further insights into dithranol-induced apoptotic events in vitro, a detailed investigation of its time- and dose-dependent effects has been performed through the evaluation of selected apoptotic markers, using a human keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT) as a model. METHODS: The time- and dose-dependent effects of dithranol on a human keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT) were investigated through the evaluation of a series of apoptotic markers; morphological changes (electron microscopy), phosphatidylserine externalisation (flow cytometry), and caspase-3/7 activation. KEY FINDINGS: The dithranol-induced apoptotic cascade was found to follow a well-defined dose and time-course, with the concentration and the period of exposure to the drug acting as the two major factors influencing the events and nature of cell death. The earliest apoptotic event detected was caspase activation (after 6 h), followed by the occurrence of phosphatidylserine externalisation (after 9 h) and subsequently the morphological characteristics associated with early and late stage apoptosis/necrosis (after 12 h). CONCLUSIONS: This study has elucidated the dose- and time-response effects of dithranol-induced apoptosis in human keratinocytes in vitro.

[Children and adolescents with psoriasis. What therapy is recommended?]. / Kinder und Jugendliche mit Psoriasis. Welche Maßnahmen werden empfohlen?

Juvenile psoriasis shows a cumulative incidence of 1.76% until the 18th year of life and thus is important for both pediatricians and dermatologists. In contrast to psoriasis in adults, the main trigger factors are infections, mechanical trauma and stress factors and to a much lesser extent medical and recreational drugs. Apart from the classical predilection sites, the diaper area, scalp and face are mainly involved. Guttate psoriasis following streptococcal infections is a specific clinical manifestation in childhood and adolescence. Psoriasis arthritis of childhood falls into the group of juvenile idiopathic arthritis and typically presents before or simultaneously with skin symptoms. All recommended childhood vaccinations should be administered, ideally when the disease is under remission. Therapy relies heavily on topical agents like dithranol, corticosteroids, and alternatively topical calcineurin inhibitors in addition to individually adapted skin moisturizing measures. In severe cases which do not adequately respond to topical therapy, systemic treatment with classical immunomodulatory agents like methotrexate, cyclosporin, retinoids and fumarates may be initiated but all usage is off-label. The only agent licensed for the treatment of psoriasis in patients above the age of 8 years is etanercept if classical treatment has failed. Rehabilitative measures in mountain and seaside areas are reasonable for maintaining improvement and helping patient learn to deal with disease.

Targeted 307 nm UVB-phototherapy in psoriasis. A pilot study comparing a 307 nm excimer light with topical dithranol.

BACKGROUND: Phototherapy is a cornerstone in treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Narrow-band UVB has been shown to be a potent therapeutic tool. To reduce the potential carcinogenic risk, targeted phototherapy has been developed using excimer lasers or excimer light devices (ELD). OBJECTIVE: The role of excimer light therapy in practice and modes of action are not completely understood. We wanted to investigate a 307 nm ELD for plaque psoriasis in comparison with topical dithranol therapy twice daily. METHODS: We conducted a pilot trial in 21 adult patients with moderate plaque-type psoriasis. Two target lesions of comparable size and plaque-modified Psoriasis Activity and Severity Index (PSI) scores were selected. Lesion A was treated three times using a newly developed 307 nm ELD. Lesion B was treated twice daily with dithranol ointment. The mean period of treatment was 9 days. Clinical evaluation included PSI scores, safety, time needed to treat, and patient's satisfaction. In addition, fluorescence-remission imaging technique was used for objective evaluation. RESULTS: Both treatments improved the PSI score (mean 3.0 points). The treatments were safe but ELD was more convenient for patients. The time needed to treat the target lesion was significantly shorter with ELD. Targeted UVB therapy normalized NADH fluorescence in lesional skin. CONCLUSIONS: The 307 nm excimer light therapy for plaque type psoriasis was equipotent to twice daily topical dithranol. Efficacy, safety, and convenience suggest that targeted UVB therapy with quasi monochromatic light is a new useful treatment option for patients with limited psoriatic plaques.

Therapy of psoriasis in childhood and adolescence - a German expert consensus.

Psoriasis of childhood shows an annual prevalence of 0.71 % and accordingly has to be regarded as a frequent chronic inflammatory skin disorder of this age. The impact on the quality of life as well as development of the afflicted children and their parents is evident. On the other side, therapy is demanding with regard to the specific juvenile metabolism, physical development and skin penetration of topical drugs. Long-term treatment at an early age has to be critically judged regarding the chronicity of the disease. Topical corticosteroids, alternatively dithranol may be used first-line, followed by vitamin D derivatives. A combination with UV-light, preferably UV-B, has to be decided on an individual basis. Systemic treatment may be initiated in recalcitrant disease with methotrexate and cyclosporine where long-term experience is available from juvenile rheumatology and transplantation medicine. Alternatively fumaric acid esters or retinoids are available. Rehabilitation procedures will help the children and their parents to cope with the disease and its treatment. The different treatment options are presented here as a German expert consensus, as clinical studies are hardly available and only a few therapeutics are licensed for this age. In any case the therapy has to be individually planned and decided together with the patients and their parents to gain maximal safety, comfort and success.

Childhood psoriasis: often favorable outcome.

(1) Plaque psoriasis is the most common form of psoriasis in children. Topical agents should be tried first, especially well-tolerated products such as emollients. Topical corticosteroids are sometimes useful during exacerbations but, given adverse effects, they should only be used for short periods; (2) UVB phototherapy is an option for extensive psoriasis refractory to local treatments, but it carries a long-term risk of skin cancer. Immunosuppressants have not been well assessed in this setting, but methotrexate has been better evaluated than the others.

A comparison of twice-daily calcipotriol ointment with once-daily short-contact dithranol cream therapy: a randomized controlled trial of supervised treatment of psoriasis vulgaris in a day-care setting.

BACKGROUND: Calcipotriol has become a first-line treatment for psoriasis. Its efficacy and safety have been shown in many comparative clinical trials carried out in outpatients. In a comparative study in patients visiting the outpatient department once every 14 days, it was shown that calcipotriol was more effective and better tolerated compared with dithranol. OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical efficacy of calcipotriol ointment with that of dithranol cream in a supervised treatment regimen. METHODS: In a multicentre randomized controlled trial in six centres in the Netherlands, 106 patients with chronic plaque psoriasis were included, 54 receiving calcipotriol ointment twice daily and 52 dithranol cream once daily. Patients were treated at the day-care centre, using the care instruction principle of daily visits during the first week and twice-weekly visits subsequently for up to 12 weeks. RESULTS: This study failed to prove that calcipotriol is as efficacious as dithranol when used in a day-care setting (noninferiority test). The mean percentage reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index from baseline to end of treatment was 57.0% in the calcipotriol group vs. 63.6% in the dithranol group. However, the two-sided test for superiority indicated no statistically significant difference between the treatment groups (P = 0.39). At the end of treatment, 15% of the patients treated with calcipotriol ointment and 25% of those treated with dithranol cream did not require any further treatment. Although calcipotriol ointment appeared to be more effective during the first 8 weeks, a difference was no longer apparent at 12 weeks. In comparison with the high number of drop-outs due to cutaneous side-effects in the calcipotriol group, the frequency of a tolerable degree of irritation appeared to be higher in patients treated with dithranol. However, concomitant corticosteroid treatment of dithranol irritation in seven patients may have contributed to this difference between both treatments. Moreover, patients receiving therapy with calcipotriol ointment experienced fewer application-related skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders than patients treated with dithranol cream: 21 of 53 (40%) and 37 of 52 (71%), respectively. This difference is statistically significant (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis that calcipotriol ointment might be at least as effective as dithranol cream in the day-care setting could not be proven in the present study. Whereas calcipotriol has become a mainstay in the routine outpatient treatment of psoriasis not requiring a day-care setting, dithranol treatment, being difficult as a routine outpatient therapy, has increased efficacy and improved tolerability if the treatment is carried out in a day-care setting.

[Classical topical therapy of psoriasis]. / Klassische Therapien der topischen Psoriasisbehandlung.

In most cases mild to moderate forms of psoriasis can be treated with topical therapy. In addition, topical agents are also routinely combined with UV or systemic therapy to treat severe forms of psoriasis. A variety of standard products are available. The oldest topical treatment is anthralin. Since 1952 the development of topical corticosteroids has revolutionized not only dermatological treatment in general but the treatment of psoriasis in particular. Through the continuous development of these compounds, a better risk-benefit profile has been achieved. Corticosteroids are the most frequently employed topical agent for psoriasis treatment worldwide.

[Maintenance therapy of psoriasis]. / Basistherapie der Psoriasis vulgaris.

Maintenance therapy in the interval between flares is an essential part of the therapeutic approach to psoriasis. The therapeutic effectiveness of maintenance therapy results from a positive influence on the physicochemical characteristics of individual compartments of the skin, especially the stratum corneum and the epidermis. The objective is revert from a pathological milieu toward a physiological one. These effects may be supplemented by pharmacological or biochemical effects of the active substances or substance mixtures. Focal points are the use of lipophilic bases as well as keratoplastic, antiseptic and antipruriginous additives.

Dithranol irritation in psoriasis treatment: a study of 68 inpatients.

The irritant response of perilesional skin is a serious limitation of dithranol therapy in psoriasis. No data are available on the actual prevalence and severity of irritation during 24-h dithranol treatment in an inpatient setting. Using a retrospective analysis of 68 patients with psoriasis visiting our inpatient department for dithranol treatment, the occurrence of dithranol irritation was studied. We found a relatively high frequency of dithranol irritation. Furthermore, most irritation occurs at the start of the therapy with relatively low concentrations.

Effectiveness and side effects of UVB-phototherapy, dithranol inpatient therapy and a care instruction programme of short contact dithranol in moderate to severe psoriasis.

The efficacy of UVB-phototherapy (UVB) and dithranol treatment for psoriasis is well established. However, well-conducted clinical trials on the efficacy of dithranol are not available, making comparison between these time-honoured treatments with currently available therapies impossible. We studied the effectiveness of dithranol in a care instruction programme using short time exposures (short contact treatment), UVB-phototherapy and dithranol treatment in an inpatient setting. In an open randomised study we included 250 patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. The intention to treat group existed of 238 patients. 100 patients were treated with short contact dithranol, 78 Patients were treated with UVB and 60 patients underwent inpatient dithranol treatment. We found UVB and dithranol treatment to be effective and safe in moderate to severe psoriasis. The efficacy of short contact dithranol treatment equals the efficacy of UVB-phototherapy. Dithranol treatment at the inpatient department showed superior efficacy in clinical response rate and treatment duration as compared to UVB and short contact treatment. The median number of days in remission was significantly longer after short contact treatment as compared to inpatient treatment. Although the use of dithranol is hampered by skin irritation and staining, the present study shows that dithranol treatment has an outstanding efficacy and safety profile. Comparison between different antipsoriatic treatments should, besides clearing capacity, reconcile duration of remission, safety, patient acceptability and costs.