RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: With our diverse training, theoretical and empirical toolkits, and rich data, evolutionary and biological anthropologists (EBAs) have much to contribute to research and policy decisions about climate change and other pressing social issues. However, we remain largely absent from these critical, ongoing efforts. Here, we draw on the literature and our own experiences to make recommendations for how EBAs can engage broader audiences, including the communities with whom we collaborate, a more diverse population of students, researchers in other disciplines and the development sector, policymakers, and the general public. These recommendations include: (1) playing to our strength in longitudinal, place-based research, (2) collaborating more broadly, (3) engaging in greater public communication of science, (4) aligning our work with open-science practices to the extent possible, and (5) increasing diversity of our field and teams through intentional action, outreach, training, and mentorship. CONCLUSIONS: We EBAs need to put ourselves out there: research and engagement are complementary, not opposed to each other. With the resources and workable examples we provide here, we hope to spur more EBAs to action.
Asunto(s)
Antropología/organización & administración , Difusión de la Información , Antropología/estadística & datos numéricos , Antropología/tendencias , Evolución Biológica , EstudiantesRESUMEN
Congressional hearings are a venue in which social scientists present their views and analyses before lawmakers in the United States, however quantitative data on their representation has been lacking. We present new, publicly available, data on the rates at which anthropologists, economists, political scientists, psychologists, and sociologists appeared before United States congressional hearings from 1946 through 2016. We show that social scientists were present at some 10,347 hearings and testified 15,506 times. Economists testify before the US Congress far more often than other social scientists, and constitute a larger proportion of the social scientists testifying in industry and government positions. We find that social scientists' testimony is increasingly on behalf of think tanks; political scientists, in particular, have gained much more representation through think tanks. Sociology, and psychology's representation before Congress has declined considerably beginning in the 1980s. Anthropologists were the least represented. These findings show that academics are representing a more diverse set of organizations, but economists continue to be far more represented than other disciplines before the US Congress.
Asunto(s)
Antropología/estadística & datos numéricos , Gobierno , Formulación de Políticas , Política , Psicología/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Pública/economía , Ciencias Sociales/estadística & datos numéricos , Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto , Humanos , Industrias , Factores de Tiempo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Biological Anthropology studies the variation and evolution of living humans, non-human primates, and extinct ancestors and for this reason the field should be in an ideal position to attract scientists from a variety of backgrounds who have different views and experiences. However, the origin and history of the discipline, anecdotal observations, self-reports, and recent surveys suggest the field has significant barriers to attracting scholars of color. For a variety of reasons, including quantitative research that demonstrates that diverse groups do better science, the discipline should strive to achieve a more diverse composition. Here we discuss the background and underpinnings of the current and historical dearth of diversity in Biological Anthropology in the U.S. specifically as it relates to representation of minority and underrepresented minority (URM) (or racialized minority) scholars. We trace this lack of diversity to underlying issues of recruitment and retention in the STEM sciences generally, to the history of Anthropology particularly around questions of race-science, and to the absence of Anthropology at many minority-serving institutions, especially HBCUs, a situation that forestalls pathways to the discipline for many minority students. The AAPA Committee on Diversity (COD) was conceived as a means of assessing and improving diversity within the discipline, and we detail the history of the COD since its inception in 2006. Prior to the COD there were no systematic AAPA efforts to consider ethnoracial diversity in our ranks and no programming around questions of diversity and inclusion. Departmental survey data collected by the COD indicate that undergraduate majors in Biological Anthropology are remarkably diverse, but that the discipline loses these scholars between undergraduate and graduate school and systematically up rank. Our analysis of recent membership demographic survey data (2014 and 2017) shows Biological Anthropology to have less ethnoracial diversity than even the affiliated STEM disciplines of Biology and Anatomy; nearly 87% of AAPA members in the United States identify as white and just 7% as URM scholars. These data also suggest that the intersection of race and gender significantly influence scholarly representation. In response to these data, we describe a substantial body of programs that have been developed by the COD to improve diversity in our ranks. Through these programs we identify principal concerns that contribute to the loss of scholars of color from the discipline at different stages in their careers, propose other directions that programming for recruitment should take, and discuss the beginnings of how to develop a more inclusive discipline at all career stages.
Asunto(s)
Antropología/estadística & datos numéricos , Docentes/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Antropología/organización & administración , Biología/organización & administración , Biología/estadística & datos numéricos , Diversidad Cultural , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
American Association of Physical Anthropologists (AAPA) membership surveys from 1996 and 1998 revealed significant gender disparities in academic status. A 2014 follow-up survey showed that gender equality had improved, particularly with respect to the number of women in tenure-stream positions. However, although women comprised 70% of AAPA membership at that time, the percentage of women full professors remained low. Here, we continue to consider the status of women in biological anthropology by examining the representation of women through a quantitative analysis of their participation in annual meetings of the AAPA during the past 20 years. We also review the programmatic goals of the AAPA Committee on Diversity Women's Initiative (COD-WIN) and provide survey results of women who participated in COD-WIN professional development workshops. Finally, we examine the diversity of women's career paths through the personal narratives of 14 women biological anthropologists spanning all ranks from graduate student to Professor Emeritus. We find that over the past 20 years, the percentage of women first authors of invited symposia talks has increased, particularly in the sub-disciplines of bioarchaeology, genetics, and paleoanthropology. The percentage of women first authors on contributed talks and posters has also increased. However, these observed increases are still lower than expected given the percentage of graduate student women and women at the rank of assistant and associate professor. The personal narratives highlight first-hand the impact of mentoring on career trajectory, the challenges of achieving work-life satisfaction, and resilience in the face of the unexpected. We end with some suggestions for how to continue to improve equality and equity for women in biological anthropology.
Asunto(s)
Antropología , Docentes , Mujeres/psicología , Antropología/organización & administración , Antropología/estadística & datos numéricos , Biología/organización & administración , Biología/estadística & datos numéricos , Selección de Profesión , Docentes/psicología , Docentes/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Madres/psicología , Sociedades Científicas/organización & administración , Sociedades Científicas/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
The transmission of genes and culture between human populations has major implications for understanding potential correlations between history, biological, and cultural variation. Understanding such dynamics in 19th century, post-contact Native Americans on the western Great Plains is especially challenging given passage of time, complexity of known dynamics, and difficulties of determining genetic patterns in historical populations for whom, even today, genetic data for their descendants are rare. Here, biometric data collected under the direction of Franz Boas from communities penecontemporaneous with the classic bison-hunting societies, were used as a proxy for genetic variation and analyzed together with cultural data. We show that both gene flow and "culture flow" among populations on the High Plains were mediated by geography, fitting a model of isolation-by-distance. Moreover, demographic and cultural exchange among these communities largely overrode the visible signal of the prior millennia of cultural and genetic histories of these populations.
Asunto(s)
Cultura , Flujo Génico , Variación Genética , Indígenas Norteamericanos/etnología , Indígenas Norteamericanos/genética , Animales , Antropología/métodos , Antropología/estadística & datos numéricos , Biometría/métodos , Bison/fisiología , Ecosistema , Geografía , Humanos , América del NorteRESUMEN
The costly interactions between humans and wildfires throughout California demonstrate the need to understand the relationships between them, especially in the face of a changing climate and expanding human communities. Although a number of statistical and process-based wildfire models exist for California, there is enormous uncertainty about the location and number of future fires, with previously published estimates of increases ranging from nine to fifty-three percent by the end of the century. Our goal is to assess the role of climate and anthropogenic influences on the state's fire regimes from 1975 to 2050. We develop an empirical model that integrates estimates of biophysical indicators relevant to plant communities and anthropogenic influences at each forecast time step. Historically, we find that anthropogenic influences account for up to fifty percent of explanatory power in the model. We also find that the total area burned is likely to increase, with burned area expected to increase by 2.2 and 5.0 percent by 2050 under climatic bookends (PCM and GFDL climate models, respectively). Our two climate models show considerable agreement, but due to potential shifts in rainfall patterns, substantial uncertainty remains for the semiarid inland deserts and coastal areas of the south. Given the strength of human-related variables in some regions, however, it is clear that comprehensive projections of future fire activity should include both anthropogenic and biophysical influences. Previous findings of substantially increased numbers of fires and burned area for California may be tied to omitted variable bias from the exclusion of human influences. The omission of anthropogenic variables in our model would overstate the importance of climatic ones by at least 24%. As such, the failure to include anthropogenic effects in many models likely overstates the response of wildfire to climatic change.
Asunto(s)
Antropología/estadística & datos numéricos , Cambio Climático/estadística & datos numéricos , Incendios/estadística & datos numéricos , Actividades Humanas/estadística & datos numéricos , California , Clima , Desastres/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , ProbabilidadRESUMEN
Se define agenesia como la ausencia de dientes por alteraciones genéticas aisladas o sindrómicas. La agenesia del tercer molar está asociada a malformaciones y es considerada por diversos autores, consecuencia de la evolución humana (Larmour et al., 2005). Son los dientes con mayor prevalencia de agenesia junto con segundos premolares e incisivos laterales (Fuller & Denehy, 1984). La prevalencia varía entre 9% y 37% (McNamara & Foley, 2006); Arboleda et al. (2006) señalan una prevalencia del 20%. La literatura indica variables estadísticas porcentuales, por género, por arcada dentaria, por lado y por diente, con escasos artículos sobre grupos originarios de Chile. La población en estudio consistió en 52 hombres y 48 mujeres, de 14 a 26 años de edad, pacientes de la Clínica Odontológica de la Universidad de Antofagasta. Todos los individuos eran sanos, sin ninguna malformación general o maxilofacial, no habían presentado enfermedades infecciosas que afectaran la odontogénesis y los períodos de erupción dentarios, sin exodoncias de ningún tercer molar y tratamiento ortodóncico previo al examen radiográfico panorámico. Se determina un 20,0% de casos de agenesia, con 8,25% de agenesia, respecto a número total de terceros molares y 1,03% de agenesia de terceros molares en relación al total de dientes. No se determina ninguna diferencia estadística significativa al 95% de confianza, predominando la agenesia en el género femenino, a nivel maxilar, en el lado izquierdo, de tipo simple, siendo el tercer molar superior izquierdo el diente que presenta el mayor número de casos de agenesia.
Agenesis is defined as the absence of teeth by genetic alterations isolated or syndromic. Agenesis of third molar is associated to malformations and is considerate by diverse authors as a consequence of human evolution (Larmour et al, 2005). The third molars are teeth with higher prevalence of agenesis together with seconds premolars and lateral incisive (Fuller & Denehy, 1984). The prevalence varies between 9 percent to 37% (McNamara & Foley, 2006). Arboleda et al. (2006) indicated a prevalence of 20%. The literature notes statistical variables percentage by gender, dental arch, side, and tooth, with few articles on groups originating from Chile. The population in study consisted of 52 men and 48 women between 14 and 26 years old, patients of the dental clinic of the Universidad de Antofagasta. All individuals were healthy, without any general or maxillofacial malformation without infectious diseases affecting the odontogenesis and dental eruption, without extractions of third molar and orthodontic treatment prior to the panoramic x-ray. A 20% of individuals with agenesis was determined, with 8.25% of agenesis respect the total number of third molars and 1.03% agenesis respect the total number of teeth. Statistical analyses did not show significant differences at 95% level, with agenesis of third molar prevalence in females, in maxilla, in the left side, simple, being the left maxillary third molar the tooth that present many number of agenesis.
Asunto(s)
Adolescente , Adulto , Anodoncia/embriología , Anodoncia/epidemiología , Anodoncia , Tercer Molar/anomalías , Tercer Molar/embriología , Antropología/estadística & datos numéricos , Antropología/métodos , Chile/epidemiología , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Etnicidad/genética , Radiografía Panorámica/métodosRESUMEN
Researchers across the health sciences are engaged in a vigorous debate over the role that the concepts of "race" and "ethnicity" play in health research and clinical practice. Here we contribute to that debate by examining how the concepts of race, ethnicity, and racism are used in medical-anthropological research. We present a content analysis of Medical Anthropology and Medical Anthropology Quarterly, based on a systematic random sample of empirical research articles (n = 283) published in these journals from 1977 to 2002. We identify both differences and similarities in the use of race, ethnicity, and racism concepts in medical anthropology and neighboring disciplines, and we offer recommendations for ways that medical anthropologists can contribute to the broader debate over racial and ethnic inequalities in health.
Asunto(s)
Antropología , Prejuicio , Grupos Raciales , Terminología como Asunto , Antropología/estadística & datos numéricos , Bibliometría , Etnicidad , Humanos , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , InvestigaciónRESUMEN
The 1998/1999 direct dating of two Neandertal specimens from level G(1) of Vindija Cave in Croatia to approximately 28,000 and approximately 29,000 radiocarbon ((14)C) years ago has led to interpretations concerning the late survival of Neandertals in south-central Europe, patterns of interaction between Neandertals and in-dispersing early modern humans in Europe, and complex biocultural scenarios for the earlier phases of the Upper Paleolithic. Given improvements, particularly in sample pretreatment techniques for bone radiocarbon samples, especially ultrafiltration of collagen samples, these Vindija G(1) Neandertal fossils are redated to approximately 32,000-33,000 (14)C years ago and possibly earlier. These results and the recent redating of a number of purportedly old modern human skeletal remains in Europe to younger time periods highlight the importance of fine chronological control when studying this biocultural time period and the tenuous nature of monolithic scenarios for the establishment of modern humans and earlier phases of the Upper Paleolithic in Europe.
Asunto(s)
Fósiles , Antropología/métodos , Antropología/estadística & datos numéricos , Antropometría/métodos , Radioisótopos de Carbono , Croacia , HumanosRESUMEN
Great ape populations are undergoing a dramatic decline, which is predicted to result in their extinction in the wild from entire regions in the near future. Recent findings have particularly focused on African apes, and have implicated multiple factors contributing to this decline, such as deforestation, hunting, and disease. Less well-publicised, but equally dramatic, has been the decline in orang-utans, whose distribution is limited to parts of Sumatra and Borneo. Using the largest-ever genetic sample from wild orang-utan populations, we show strong evidence for a recent demographic collapse in North Eastern Borneo and demonstrate that this signature is independent of the mutation and demographic models used. This is the first demonstration that genetic data can detect and quantify the effect of recent, human-induced deforestation and habitat fragmentation on an endangered species. Because current demographic collapses are usually confounded by ancient events, this suggests a much more dramatic decline than demographic data alone and emphasises the need for major conservation efforts.