New Data on GLP-1s, Diabetic Retinopathy, and CGMs-Highlights From the ADA's Scientific Sessions.

This Medical News article is an interview with Robert Gabbay, MD, PhD, the American Diabetes Association's chief scientific and medical officer.

Tackling obstructive sleep apnea with pharmacotherapeutics: expert guidance.

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of non-pharmacotherapeutic treatment of obstructive sleep apnea, a highly prevalent condition with serious cardiometabolic and neurocognitive health consequences, is well established. Supplementing traditional treatment strategies with medications can improve symptoms and reduce side effects. Efforts to identify medications that target the causes of sleep apnea have met with mixed success. However, this remains a worthwhile objective for researchers to pursue, given the potential benefit pharmacotherapy could bring to those patients who reject or struggle to adhere to existing treatments. AREAS COVERED: This article presents the case for obstructive sleep apnea pharmacotherapy including drugs that reduce the occurrence of apnea events, such as weight loss agents, ventilation activators and muscle and nervous system stimulants, drugs that alleviate symptoms, such as wake-promoting agents for excessive daytime sleepiness, and drugs that improve adherence to existing treatments, such as hypnotics. Literature was accessed from PubMed between 1 March 2024 and 18 April 2024. EXPERT OPINION: Exciting recent advances in both our understanding of obstructive sleep apnea pathology and in the techniques used to identify therapeutic agents and their targets combine to embolden a positive outlook for the expanded use of drugs in tackling this consequential disease.

Evaluating pharmacological treatments for excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnea: A comprehensive network meta-analysis and systematic review.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). Pharmacotherapy offers a potential treatment approach for EDS in OSA patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions for alleviating EDS in patients with OSA. Following PRISMA guidelines, we included randomized controlled trials investigating pharmacological treatments for EDS in adult OSA until August 2023. We conducted meta-analysis, subgroup, and meta-regression analyses using a random effects model. Finally, a network meta-analysis synthesized direct and indirect evidence, followed by a comprehensive safety analysis. We included 32 articles in the meta-analysis (n = 3357). Pharmacotherapy showed a significant improvement in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score (Mean Difference (MD) -2.73, (95 % Confidence Interval (CI) [-3.25, -2.20], p < 0.01) and Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) score (MD 6.00 (95 % CI [2.66, 9.33] p < 0.01). Solriamfetol, followed by Pitolisant and modafinil, exhibited the greatest ESS reduction, while Danavorexton, followed by Solriamfetol and MK-7288, had the strongest impact on MWT. MK-7288 had the most total adverse events (AEs), followed by Danavorexton and armodafinil. Pharmacological Interventions significantly alleviate EDS in OSA patients but with heterogeneity across medications. Treatment decisions should involve a personalized assessment of patient factors and desired outcomes.

Antioxidant therapies for obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common clinical problem that is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes attributed to the oxidative stress due to sympathetic overstimulation. Treatment approaches targeting oxidative stress have been tried by multiple investigators. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of such approaches. METHODS: Pubmed and Embase databases were searched for human studies evaluating the utility of antioxidant therapies in patients with OSA. RESULTS: A total of six studies (five randomized trials and one case-control study) were included, including 160 patients with OSA using N-acetyl cysteine, vitamin C, carbocysteine, superoxide dismutase, vitamin E, allopurinol, and their combinations. There was a significant improvement in flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) following antioxidants, with the pooled effect being 2.16 % (95% CI 1.65-2.67) using the random-effects model (I2 = 0% and p<0.001). It was also associated with a significant reduction in malondialdehyde levels and an increase in reduced glutathione (GSH) levels. There was also a significant improvement in the Epworth sleepiness scale, oxygen desaturation index, and minimum oxygen saturation during sleep without any significant adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Antioxidant therapy in patients with OSA is associated with improved endothelial function, reduced oxidative stress, and improved sleep parameters. These results call for future multicentre studies with longer follow-ups to assess the utility of antioxidant therapy in patients with OSA.

Effect of antihypertensive agents on sleep apnea and ambulatory blood pressure in patients with hypertension: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and hypertension are common conditions that may be linked through sympathetic activation and water retention. We hypothesized that diuretics, which reduce the body water content, may be more effective than amlodipine, a blood pressure (BP)-lowering agent implicated with edema, in controlling OSA in patients with hypertension. We also aimed to compare the effects of these treatments on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind clinical trial, we compared the effects of chlorthalidone/amiloride 25/5 mg with amlodipine 10 mg on OSA measured by portable sleep monitor and BP measured by ABPM. The study included participants older than 40 who had moderate OSA (10-40 apneas/hour of sleep) and BP within the systolic range of 140-159 mmHg or diastolic range of 90-99 mmHg. RESULTS: The individuals in the experimental groups were comparable in age, gender, and other relevant characteristics. Neither the combination of diuretics nor amlodipine alone reduced the AHI after 8 weeks of treatment (AHI 26.3 with diuretics and 25.0 with amlodipine. P = 0.713). Both treatments significantly lowered office, 24-h, and nighttime ABP, but the two groups had no significant difference. CONCLUSION: Chlorthalidone associated with amiloride and amlodipine are ineffective in decreasing the frequency of sleep apnea episodes in patients with moderate OSA and hypertension. Both treatments have comparable effects in lowering both office and ambulatory blood pressure. The notion that treatments could offer benefits for both OSA and hypertension remains to be demonstrated. TRIAL REGISTRATION CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01896661.

[Research status of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on obstructive sleep apnea].

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the most common sleep-disordered breathing disease. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold standard for treatment, but compliance is suboptimal. Therefore, new therapeutic strategies need to be explored. OSA is often associated with multiple comorbidities, particularly type 2 diabetes and obesity. Effective weight loss is known to be crucial in reversing OSA and its associated comorbidities. However, sustained weight loss is difficult to achieve with lifestyle changes alone. Medications that have both hypoglycemic and weight-loss effects are one way to achieve this goal. This article discussed the therapeutic effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on this disease.

Tirzepatide for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: Rationale, design, and sample baseline characteristics of the SURMOUNT -OSA phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Weight reduction is a standard recommendation for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treatment in people with obesity or overweight; however, weight loss can be challenging to achieve and maintain without bariatric surgery. Currently, no approved anti-obesity medication has demonstrated effectiveness in OSA management. This study is evaluating the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide for treatment of moderate to severe OSA in people with obesity. METHODS: SURMOUNT-OSA, a randomized, placebo -controlled, 52-week phase 3 trial, is investigating the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide for treatment of moderate to severe OSA (apnea hypopnea- index ≥15 events/h) in participants with obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2) and an established OSA diagnosis. SURMOUNT-OSA is made of 2 intervention-specific appendices (ISAs): ISA-1 includes participants with no current OSA treatment, and ISA-2 includes participants using positive airway pressure therapy. Overall, 469 participants have been randomized 1:1 to receive tirzepatide or placebo across the master protocol (ISA-1, n = 234; ISA-2, n = 235). All participants are also receiving lifestyle intervention for weight reduction. RESULTS: The primary endpoint for the individual ISAs is the difference in apnea hypopnea- index response, as measured by polysomnography, between tirzepatide and placebo arms at week 52. Secondary endpoints include sleep apnea-specific hypoxic burden, functional outcomes, and cardiometabolic biomarkers. The trial employs digital wearables, including home sleep testing to capture time to improvement and accelerometry for daily physical activity assessment, to evaluate exploratory outcomes. CONCLUSION: SURMOUNT-OSA brings a novel design to investigate if tirzepatide provides clinically meaningful improvement in obesity-related OSA by targeting the underlying etiology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05412004.

Pharmacological interventions for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA): Network meta-analysis.

IMPORTANCE: Pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disease that can have significant negative impacts on a child's health and development. A comprehensive evaluation of different pharmacologic interventions for the treatment of OSA in children is still lacking. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to conduct a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis of pharmacological interventions for the management of obstructive sleep apnea in pediatric population. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and CNKI were searched from 1950 to November 2022 for pediatric OSA. STUDY SELECTION: Multiple reviewers included Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning drugs on OSA in children. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Multiple observers followed the guidance of the PRISMA NMA statement for data extraction and evaluation. Bayesian network meta-analyses(fixed-effect model) were performed to compare the weighted mean difference (WMD), logarithmic odds ratios (log OR), and the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) of the included pharmacological interventions. Our protocol was registered in PROSPERO website (CRD42022377839). MAIN OUTCOME(S) AND MEASURE(S): The primary outcomes were improvements in the apnea/hypopnea index (AHI), while secondary outcomes included adverse events and the lowest arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2). RESULTS: 17 RCTs with a total of 1367 children with OSA aged 2-14 years that met the inclusion criteria were eventually included in our systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ten drugs were finally included in the study. The results revealed that Mometasone + Montelukast (WMD-4.74[95%CrIs -7.50 to -2.11], Budesonide (-3.45[-6.86 to -0.15], and Montelukast(-3.41[-5.45 to -1.39] exhibited significantly superior therapeutic effects compared to the placebo concerning apnea hypopnea index (AHI) value with 95%CrIs excluding no effect. Moreover, Mometasone + Montelukast achieved exceptionally high SUCRA values for both AHI (85.0 %) and SaO2 (91.0 %). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The combination of mometasone furoate nasal spray and oral montelukast sodium exhibits the highest probability of being the most effective intervention. Further research is needed to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety profiles of these interventions in pediatric patients with OSA.

Effect of norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors combined with antimuscarinic agents vs monotherapy for OSA: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Randomized controlled trials have shown that combining norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and antimuscarinics can ameliorate the severity of obstructive sleep apnea. This article explores whether the effectiveness and safety of combining norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors with antimuscarinic agents surpass monotherapy for treating obstructive sleep apnea. METHODS: We searched randomized controlled trials including adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea who received combination therapy and monotherapy in 8 databases from inception until April 5, 2023 and evaluated the studies' quality and conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review. The primary outcome was the apnea-hypopnea index. Secondary outcome measures included loop gain, hypoxic burden, oxygen desaturation index, and ventilation at low ventilatory drive, among other indicators. We assessed the quality of the studies using Cochrane Methods criteria. RESULTS: We identified 4 randomized controlled trials for systematic review and 2 for meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors combined with antimuscarinic agents in patients with obstructive sleep apnea prolonged total sleep time by a mean of 28.20 minutes [95% confidence interval (5.78, 50.61), P = .01] and increased sleep efficiency by 4.73% [95% confidence interval (0.50, 8.97), P = .03] compared with norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors alone. Other indices and adverse events were of no statistical significance. The systematic reviews revealed that norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors combined with antimuscarinics may be superior to monotherapy in improving apnea-hypopnea index and endotypic traits. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation demonstrated the potential advantages of combining norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors plus antimuscarinics for treating OSA compared with norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors alone and revealed no statistically significant difference in drug safety. CITATION: Wang J, Ye Y, Shang Z, et al. Effect of norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors combined with antimuscarinic agents vs monotherapy for OSA: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(8):1363-1372.

The benefits of hypoglycemic therapy for patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

PURPOSE: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is often associated with glycemic abnormalities. This study is conducted to investigate the effects of hypoglycemic therapy on OSA-related indicators. METHOD: We systematically searched Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles on OSA patients receiving any hypoglycemic drugs, published until December 25, 2022. Seven original studies were finally included. The proposal was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022351206). RESULTS: In summary, in addition to reduced glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), we found that hypoglycemic treatment can lower the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) by 7.07/h (p = 0.0001). Although long-term treatment (> 12 weeks) achieved a more significant reduction in HbA1c (- 1.57% vs. - 0.30%) compared to short-term treatment (≤ 12 weeks), there was no significant difference between the two in terms of AHI (intergroup p-value = 0.27). We also found that patients using sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) experienced a greater reduction in AHI (- 11.00/h, p < 0.00001). Additionally, hypoglycemic treatment also showed certain improvements in related indicators like Epworth Sleepiness Scale, body mass index, and blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Our results affirm the benefits of hypoglycemic treatment for OSA patients and highlight the notable effect of SGLT2i. Further researches are needed to help doctors gain a comprehensive understanding of the interaction between OSA and glycemic abnormalities.

DAHOS Study: Efficacy of dapagliflozin in treating heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome - A 3-month, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The recent discovery of new therapeutic approaches to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), including sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, as well as improved treatment of co-morbidities has provided much needed help to HFrEF. In addition, dapagliflozin, one of the SGLT-2 inhibitors, serves as a promising candidate in treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) of HFrEF patients due to its likely mechanism of countering the pathophysiology of OSA of HFrEF. METHODS: This 3-month multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolled participants with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 40% and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) greater than 15. Participants were randomized into two groups: the treatment group received optimized heart failure treatment and standard-dose dapagliflozin, while the control group only received optimized heart failure treatment. The primary endpoint was the difference in AHI before and after treatment between the two groups. Secondary endpoints included oxygen desaturation index (ODI), minimum oxygen saturation, longest apnea duration, inflammatory factors (CRP, IL-6), quality of life score, and LVEF. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were included in the final analysis. AHI, LVEF and other baseline data were similar for the dapagliflozin and control groups. After 12 weeks of dapagliflozin treatment, the dapagliflozin group showed significant improvements in sleep parameters including AHI, HI, longest pause time, ODI, time spent with SpO2 < 90%, and average SpO2. Meanwhile, the control group showed no significant changes in sleep parameters, but did demonstrate significant improvements in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, LVEF, and NT-proBNP levels at 12 weeks. In the experimental group, BMI was significantly reduced, and there were improvements in ESS score, MLHFQ score, and EQ-5D-3L score, as well as significant reductions in CRP and IL-6 levels, while the CRP and IL-6 levels were not improved in the control group. The decrease in LVEF was more significant in the experimental group compared to the control group. There were no significant differences in the magnitude of the decreases between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dapagliflozin may be an effective treatment for heart failure complicated with OSA, and could be considered as a potential new treatment for OSA. (Trial registration  www.chictr.org.cn , ChiCTR2100049834. Registered 10 August 2021).

Correlation between positive airway pressure and medication adherence: the healthy user effect.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Despite the efficacy of positive airway pressure (PAP) for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea, adherence remains challenging and negatively affects assessments of effectiveness. It is unclear whether low adherence is due to intolerance of PAP or whether this reflects overall adherence with medical therapy. We sought to correlate PAP use with medication adherence to determine whether poor adherence with PAP was specific to this treatment or represented global compliance with medical therapy. METHODS: A total of 600 consecutive patients with obstructive sleep apnea were treated with PAP. Objective measures of PAP use were correlated with medication adherence. We included all chronically used medications, defined as medications used daily for at least 90 days prior to PAP initiation. Medication use was verified using an electronic health record. PAP adherence ("regular use") was defined as PAP use for ≥ 4 hours/night on ≥ 70% of nights. Medication adherence was defined as > 70% of pills taken as prescribed. RESULTS: Complete records were available for 566 patients; 361 (63.8%) used chronic medications. The cohort was primarily men (90.3%, age 44.6 ± 10.2 years) with moderate obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index, 18.1 ± 13.9 events/h). In patients on chronic medications, PAP was used 55.8% of nights and 37.7% were regular users. Patients who were adherent with medications used PAP more hours/night (5.4 vs 4.6, P < .001) and were more likely to have regular PAP use compared with those nonadherent with medications (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence with PAP correlated with adherence to chronic medications. Low PAP adherence may reflect an individual's global adherence to medical care. This association may lead to better identification of patients who benefit from targeted therapy to improve overall health care adherence. CITATION: Lettieri MJ, Warren WA, Walter RJ, Lettieri CJ. Correlation between positive airway pressure and medication adherence: the healthy user effect. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(7):1087-1092.

PPARγ Agonist Rosiglitazone and Antagonist GW9662: Antihypertensive Effects on Chronic Intermittent Hypoxia-Induced Hypertension in Rats.

The increased incidence of hypertension associated with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) presents significant physical, psychological, and economic challenges. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) plays a role in both OSA and hypertension, yet the therapeutic potential of PPARγ agonists and antagonists for OSA-related hypertension remains unexplored. Therefore, we constructed a chronic intermittent hypoxia (CIH)-induced hypertension rat model that mimics the pathogenesis of OSA-related hypertension in humans. The model involved administering PPARγ agonist rosiglitazone (RSG), PPARγ antagonist GW9662, or normal saline, followed by regular monitoring of blood pressure and thoracic aorta analysis using staining and electron microscopy. Intriguingly, our results indicated that both RSG and GW9662 appeared to potently counteract CIH-induced hypertension. In silico study suggested that GW9662's antihypertensive effect might mediated through angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AGTR1). Our findings provide insights into the mechanisms of OSA-related hypertension and propose novel therapeutic targets.

Pharmacological treatment for obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Summarize the evidence on drug therapies for obstructive sleep apnea. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, LILACS, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched on February 17th, 2023. A search strategy retrieved randomized clinical trials comparing the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) in pharmacotherapies. Studies were selected and data was extracted by two authors independently. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. RevMan 5.4. was used for data synthesis. RESULTS: 4930 articles were obtained, 68 met inclusion criteria, and 29 studies (involving 11 drugs) were combined in a meta-analysis. Atomoxetine plus oxybutynin vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -7.71 (-10.59, -4.83) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 50 %, overall effect: Z = 5.25, p < 0.001]. Donepezil vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -8.56 (-15.78, -1.33) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 21 %, overall effect: Z = 2.32, p = 0.02]. Sodium oxybate vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -5.50 (-9.28, -1.73) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 32 %, overall effect: Z = 2.86, p = 0.004]. Trazodone vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -12.75 (-21.30, -4.19) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 0 %, overall effect: Z = 2.92, p = 0.003]. CONCLUSION: The combination of noradrenergic and antimuscarinic drugs shows promising results. Identifying endotypes may be the key to future drug therapies for obstructive sleep apnea. Moreover, studies with longer follow-up assessing the safety and sustained effects of these treatments are needed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022362639.

The impact of intranasal corticosteroids in a prospective cohort of children with sleep disordered breathing.

INTRODUCTION: Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is common in children and the most common reason for adenotonsillectomy. This large observational cohort study from a specialist outpatient clinic describes the impact of intranasal steroids (INS) on symptom improvement and the need for surgery. METHOD: Observational cohort study of 568 children assessing the impact of INS using the OSA-5 questionnaire with clinical and surgical outcome measures. RESULTS: The mean OSA-5 score at first visit was 7.78. Symptoms were persistent for a median 9 months (range 2-72). 51% underwent a trial of INS with 56% reporting symptomatic improvement. The mean score decreased from 8.2 to 5.5 (p < 0.0001) in those prescribed INS. They had a significantly higher symptom load (p < 0.01), turbinate size (p < 0.005) and history of atopy (p < 0.01) than the non-trial group. The rate of surgery in the non-trial group was 56% compared with 38% in those who had INS (p < 0.001). With increasing symptom burden, the reported improvement with INS and comparative reduction in surgery increased. Baseline OSA-5 scores were predictive of rates of surgery. Atopic status or age did not influence response to INS. CONCLUSION: The mean score at first visit and the median duration of symptoms indicated significant persistent symptoms in this cohort. The use of INS improved symptoms of SDB in 56%. The need for surgery in the group that received INS was 38% compared with 56% in those not trialling INS, despite the non-trial group having significantly less symptoms and signs. Symptomatic improvement was not influenced by age or atopic status.

A novel TASK channel antagonist nasal spray reduces sleep apnea severity in physiological responders: a randomized, blinded, trial.

Preclinical and human physiological studies indicate that topical, selective TASK 1/3 K+ channel antagonism increases upper airway dilator muscle activity and reduces pharyngeal collapsibility during anesthesia and nasal breathing during sleep. The primary aim of this study was to determine the effects of BAY2586116 nasal spray on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity and whether individual responses vary according to differences in physiological responses and route of breathing. Ten people (5 females) with OSA [apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) = 47 ± 26 events/h (means ± SD)] who completed previous sleep physiology studies with BAY2586116 were invited to return for three polysomnography studies to quantify OSA severity. In random order, participants received either placebo nasal spray (saline), BAY2586116 nasal spray (160 µg), or BAY2586116 nasal spray (160 µg) restricted to nasal breathing (chinstrap or mouth tape). Physiological responders were defined a priori as those who had improved upper airway collapsibility (critical closing pressure ≥2 cmH2O) with BAY2586116 nasal spray (NCT04236440). There was no systematic change in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI3) from placebo versus BAY2586116 with either unrestricted or nasal-only breathing versus placebo (47 ± 26 vs. 43 ± 27 vs. 53 ± 33 events/h, P = 0.15). However, BAY2586116 (unrestricted breathing) reduced OSA severity in physiological responders compared with placebo (e.g., AHI3 = 28 ± 11 vs. 36 ± 12 events/h, P = 0.03 and ODI3 = 18 ± 10 vs. 28 ± 12 events/h, P = 0.02). Morning blood pressure was also lower in physiological responders after BAY2586116 versus placebo (e.g., systolic blood pressure = 137 ± 24 vs. 147 ± 21 mmHg, P < 0.01). In conclusion, BAY2586116 reduces OSA severity during sleep in people who demonstrate physiological improvement in upper airway collapsibility. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of this novel pharmacotherapy target in selected individuals.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Preclinical findings in pigs and humans indicate that blocking potassium channels in the upper airway with topical nasal application increases pharyngeal dilator muscle activity and reduces upper airway collapsibility. In this study, BAY2586116 nasal spray (potassium channel blocker) reduced sleep apnea severity in those who had physiological improvement in upper airway collapsibility. BAY2586116 lowered the next morning's blood pressure. These findings highlight the potential for this novel therapeutic approach to improve sleep apnea in certain people.

Drug therapies for obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common disorder that can affect the quality of life and increase the risk for psychiatric, neurological and cardiometabolic diseases. Despite the significant burden, it poses on health and well-being, there is a lack of evidence regarding the use of drug therapies in these patients. This work aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatment alternatives for patients with OSA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SciELO, LILACS, Scopus, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov, will be used for the search. A search strategy was developed to retrieve clinical trials that have evaluated polysomnographic primary outcome (Apnoea-Hypopnoea index) and secondary outcomes (eg, daytime sleepiness, adverse events) of any drug therapy used for OSA. No date or language restrictions will be applied. Two authors will independently select the studies meeting the inclusion criteria by screening the title, abstract and full text. Data will be extracted, and the risk of bias will be evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Review Manager V.5.4.1 will be used for data synthesis. The Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation will be used to assess the strength of the evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As a review of published data, it is not necessary to obtain ethical approval. The findings of this systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022362639.