Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures-Beyond B2.

The proliferation of hip arthroplasty has seen concomitant increases in periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs). The most common pattern involves fracture at the level of a loose prosthesis (B2). B2 PFFs have a unique mechanopathogenesis linked to the tendency of polished taper-slip cemented stems to subside in the cement. Such stems carry a much higher PFF risk than other cemented designs. Mega-data, consistent across national registries, suggest that increasing application of the taper-slip principle has resulted in the emergence of highly polished, very low friction cemented prostheses. These have the propensity to migrate within the cement, increasing B2 PFF risk. This would explain the strong association between cobalt-chromium stems and PFF. Is PFF the mode of failure of polished taper-slip stems rather than aseptic loosening? Established wisdom teaches that B2 PFFs should be managed with revision surgery. There is a large body of new evidence that, in certain instances, fixation results in outcomes at least equivalent to revision arthroplasty, with shorter surgical time, decreased transfusion requirements, and lower dislocation risk. This is so in B2 PFFs around cemented polished taper-slip stems with an intact bone-cement interface. We outline advances in understanding of B2 PFF with special reference to mechanopathogenesis and indications for fixation.

Reliably calibrating X-ray images required for preoperative planning of THA using a device-adapted magnification factor.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Calibrated pelvic X-ray images are needed in the preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty (THA) to predict component sizes. Errors and mismatch in the size of one or more components are reported, which can lead to clinically relevant complications. Our aim is to investigate whether we can solve the fundamental problem of X-ray calibration and whether traditional X-ray still has a place in preoperative planning despite improved radiological alternatives. METHODS: Based on geometric and radiographic principles, we estimate that the magnification factor is adapted to the X-ray device and depends strongly on the source-image distance of the device. We analyse the errors of the various calibration methods and investigate which narrow range can be expected to show that the center of rotation is sufficiently accurate. Based on the results of several CT-scans we defined an adapted magnification factor and validated the degree of measurement accuracy. RESULTS: The true magnification of objects on X-ray images depends mainly on the device settings. Stem size prediction is possible to a limited extent, with an error margin of 4.3%. Components can be predicted with a safety margin of one size up and down as with CT or 3D images. The prerequisite is that the source-image distance is greater than or equal to 120 cm, the table-image distance is known, and the object-image distance is estimated according to the patient's BMI. We defined a device-adapted magnification factor that simplifies the templating routine and can be used to obtain the most reliable preoperative dimensional measurements that can be expected from X-ray images. We found the error margin of the magnification factor with the highest degrees of prediction and precision. CONCLUSION: Preoperative planning is reliable and reproducible using X-ray images if calibration is performed with the device-adapted magnification factor suggested in this paper.

Are Metal Ion Levels Elevated After Dual Mobility Acetabular Systems Minimum Five-Year Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Dual mobility acetabular systems for total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been shown to have decreased dislocation rates and reduced revision rates, but there is controversy over the potential release of sufficient levels of metal ions into the blood to cause adverse local tissue reactions. However, there is a lack of long-term studies analyzing these levels of cobalt and chromium. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the levels these metal ions at a minimum 5-year follow-up after dual mobility implantation. Specifically, we analyzed: 1. overall blood and urine cobalt levels; 2. overall blood and urine chromium levels; 3. cobalt levels stratified by length of follow-up and various implant-related metrics (i.e., offset, cup size, stem, and neck angle); as well as 4. chromium levels stratified by length of follow-up and these various implant-related metrics. METHODS: A total of 41 patients who underwent THA with modular dual mobility acetabular systems between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2016, were identified and followed for a mean time of 6 years (range: 5 to 10 years). All patients had well-functioning hips (Harris Hip Scores greater than 90 points (range: 90 to 100 points) and had no evidence of impending radiographic failure or progressive radiolucencies. Cobalt and chromium serum and plasma, blood, as well as urine levels were obtained at final followup. Additional parameters analyzed included: head material and size, stem offset, cup size, as well as stem-neck angle. RESULTS: Concentrations of cobalt were low as the mean blood and urine levels for all patients were 0.6 ± 0.5 µg/L (normal < 1.8 µg/L) and 0.8 ± 0.8 µg/L (normal < 2.8 µg/L), respectively. Only one patient had a minimally elevated blood cobalt level by 0.1 µg/L. These levels were not substantially different when subgroup analyses were performed for ceramic and cobalt-chrome heads. The mean chromium levels in blood and urine were also found to be low for all patients as values were 0.8 ± 0.2 µg/L (normal: < 1.2 µg/L) and 1.2 ± 0.5 ng/milliliter (normal: < 2 ng/L), respectively. Similarly, only one patient had a very slightly elevated blood chromium level of 1.3 µg/L. Additionally, analyses of ceramic or cobalt-chrome heads separately did not demonstrate differences in blood or urine levels. Blood cobalt or chromium concentrations had minimal changes with longer lengths of follow-ups, and with different stem offsets, cup sizes, stems, or neck angles. CONCLUSION: Dual mobility acetabular systems when combined with the two stems studied produced low levels of blood as well as urine cobalt and chromium levels at a minimum follow-up of 5 years (mean: 6 years; range: 5 to 10 years). These results remained below the threshold of normal and clinically insignificant regardless of length of follow-up, head material, or various implant measurements. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate low levels of metal ions at longer than 4-year follow-up. These data may be of importance to surgeons deciding on the appropriate implants to use for their high-risk patients.

Dual Mobility Versus Fixed Bearing Implants in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Under 55 Years of Age.

INTRODUCTION: Prosthetic dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most common causes of revision THA. Dual-mobility (DM) bearings were introduced to mitigate complications; however, there is minimal data on their performance in younger patients. This study compared results of patients who were under 55 years of age undergoing primary THA with DM or fixed-bearing (FB) implants. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients younger than 55 years who underwent primary THA with at least 2 years of follow-up between June 2011 and August 2019 was performed. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on the implant they received (DM vs. FB). Primary outcomes were 90-day all-cause readmission, dislocation, all-cause revision, 90-day readmission and revision due to dislocation, and implant component survivorship. Demographic differences were assessed using chi-squared and independent samples t-tests. Outcomes were compared using multivariate linear and logistic regressions to control for confounding variables. RESULTS: A total of 803 patients were included (DM = 73, FB = 730). The DM and FB cohorts had similar rates of 90- day all-cause readmission (6.8% vs. 3.2%; p = 0.243) and 90-day readmission due to dislocation (4.1% vs. 0.8%; p = 0.653). At a mean follow-up of 4.42 ± 1.91 years, dislocation (4.1% vs. 1.1%; p = 0.723) and all-cause revision (5.5% vs. 4.9%; p = 0.497) rates between the DM and FB cohorts were similar. Kaplan Meier analysis yielded no significant differences in survivorship between groups for all-cause revision (95.1% vs. 94.5%; p = 0.923), revision due to dislocation (100% vs. 98.9%; p = 0.370), and acetabular component revision (97.3% vs. 98.6%; p = 0.418). CONCLUSION: Dual mobility implants demonstrate similar dislocation rates and implant survivorship compared to FB in patients less than 55 years of age. Larger trials with long-term follow-up may be required to further elucidate the effects of DM bearings compared to FB inserts in younger patients undergoing primary THA.

Polyethylene liner dissociation in total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective case-control study on a single implant design.

BACKGROUND: Modular acetabular components for total hip arthroplasty (THA) provide intraoperative flexibility; however, polyethylene liner dissociation may occur. This study aimed to examine the incidence and causes of liner dissociation associated with a specific acetabular component design at a single centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 7027 patients who underwent primary THA was performed to identify isolated liner dislocations. Patient demographics, clinical presentations, surgical and implant details, and both radiographic and computed tomography (CT) findings were analysed. Patients with liner dislocation were matched to a control group via 2:1 propensity score matching, and a logistic regression analysis was employed to identify associated risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients (0.45%) experienced liner dislocation at a mean 71.47 ± 60.10 months post surgery. Significant factors contributing to dislocations included the use of a conventional compared with a highly crosslinked polyethylene component (p = 0.049) and screw fixation (p = 0.028). Radiographic and CT analysis highlighted the importance of proper component orientation, revealing that patients experiencing dislocations demonstrated significantly lower acetabular cup anteversion angles (p = 0.001) compared with the control group. Impingement and malposition, identified in 41% and 47% of the cases, respectively, further underscored the multifactorial nature of dislocation risks. CONCLUSIONS: While the overall rate of polyethylene liner dislocation was low, the findings of this study highlight the importance of appropriate cup placement to decrease the risk of dissociation. It further substantiates the influence of impingement and malposition in liner displacement, with increased mechanical stress exerted on the locking mechanism under adverse conditions and the potential risk increase due to screw placement.

Association between cup fixation screw and iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty can result not only from acetabular cup but also from cup fixation screw. However, research addressing this screw impingement is scarce, leaving the details undetermined. This study aimed to elucidate the incidence and threshold of symptomatic iliopsoas impingement attributable to protrusion of the cup fixation screw into the iliopsoas muscle and to evaluate its impact on postoperative radiographic imaging findings and patient-reported outcome measures. METHODS: A total of 152 hips were included in this study. The symptomatic threshold of screw protrusion was determined using a receiver operating characteristic curve, and patients were divided into low-protrusion and high-protrusion groups using this threshold. The area and Hounsfield Unit values of the iliopsoas muscle on CT and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire postoperatively were investigated. FINDINGS: 10 hips (6.5%) were exhibited symptoms of IPI in this series. The threshold for screw protrusion length was identified as 6.4 mm. Patients in the high protrusion group exhibited significantly larger area and lower Hounsfield Unit values of the iliopsoas muscle. In addition, the high protrusion group revealed significantly lower scores (total, pain, movement, mental). Furthermore, subscales scores (pain, movement) in the high protrusion group didn't improve from 3 months to 12 months postoperatively with significance. INTERPRETATION: This study underscores the imperative for surgeons to consider the length of the cup fixation screw. This careful consideration is crucial for mitigating the incidence of postoperative iliopsoas impingement and enhancing total hip arthroplasty outcomes.

Determination of rotation center and diameter of femoral heads using off-the-shelf augmented reality hardware for navigation.

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), determining the center of rotation (COR) and diameter of the hip joint (acetabulum and femoral head) is essential to restore patient biomechanics. This study investigates on-the-fly determination of hip COR and size, using off-the-shelf augmented reality (AR) hardware. An AR head-mounted device (HMD) was configured with inside-out infrared tracking enabling the determination of surface coordinates using a handheld stylus. Two investigators examined 10 prosthetic femoral heads and cups, and 10 human femurs. The HMD calculated the diameter and COR through sphere fitting. Results were compared to data obtained from either verified prosthetic geometry or post-hoc CT analysis. Repeated single-observer measurements showed a mean diameter error of 0.63 mm ± 0.48 mm for the prosthetic heads and 0.54 mm ± 0.39 mm for the cups. Inter-observer comparison yielded mean diameter errors of 0.28 mm ± 0.71 mm and 1.82 mm ± 1.42 mm for the heads and cups, respectively. Cadaver testing found a mean COR error of 3.09 mm ± 1.18 mm and a diameter error of 1.10 mm ± 0.90 mm. Intra- and inter-observer reliability averaged below 2 mm. AR-based surface mapping using HMD proved accurate and reliable in determining the diameter of THA components with promise in identifying COR and diameter of osteoarthritic femoral heads.

Total hip arthroplasty with porous tantalum trabecular metal pads in patients with Crowe IV developmental dysplasia of the hip: a midterm followup study.

PURPOSE: Crowe IV developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a catastrophic hip disease. Moreover, obtaining ideal clinical efficacy in conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA) is often difficult. In this study, we aimed to assess the mid-term clinical results of THA with porous tantalum trabecular metal (TM) pads for acetabular reconstruction in the treatment of Crowe IV DDH. METHODS: A cohort of 28 patients (32 hips) diagnosed with Crowe type IV DDH who underwent acetabular reconstruction during THA using TM pads with scheduled follow-up between 2011 and 2018, were included in this study. Eight cases were men and 24 were women, with a mean age of 48.4 years (range, 36-72 years) and a mean follow-up was 74.3 months (range, 42-132 months). All patients underwent acetabular reconstruction using TM pads and total hip replacement with subtrochanteric osteotomy. RESULTS: At the final follow-up, 28 hips (87.5%) demonstrated mild or no postoperative limping. The Harris Hip Score improved from 58.4 ± 10.6 preoperatively to 85.6 ± 8.9. The mean pain, stiffness, and function scores on the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis index were 86.5 ± 10.2, 87.3 ± 12.4 and 85.4 ± 11.6 respectively. The mean score of patient satisfaction was 90.4 ± 7.6. Additionally, the SF-12 physical summary score was 41.8 ± 5.6 and the SF-12 mental summary score was 51.6 ± 5.4. TM construct survivorship due to all-cause failure was 90.6% at 5 years with 3 hips at risk, 87.5% at 10 years with 4 hips at risk. The survivorship due to failure from aseptic loosening was 96.9% at 5 years with 1hips at risk and 93.75% at 10 years with 2 hips at risk. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated satisfactory mid-term clinical and radiological results with the application of TM pads for acetabular reconstruction combined with THA in patients with Crowe IV DDH. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR1800014526, Date: 18/01/2018.

Retrieval Analysis of Titanium Nitride Coatings for Orthopaedic Implants.

BACKGROUND: The first generation of titanium nitride (TiN) coatings for orthopaedic implants was clinically introduced in the 1990s because of their promising biocompatibility, wear resistance, and corrosion resistance. This study evaluated the in vivo performance of early TiN-coated knee and hip implants, focusing on the bearing surfaces and mechanisms of in vivo damage. METHODS: There were 13 TiN-coated implants (5 knee and 8 hip) retrieved from 8 patients as part of a multi-institutional implant retrieval program. The average implantation time was 4.25 years for knees and 17.5 years for hips. Implant revisions occurred for various reasons, including polyethylene wear, loosening, pain, infection, and instability. Components were examined using a semiquantitative scoring method, and surface roughness measurements were performed using white-light interferometry. Surface morphology, chemistry, and particle characterization were also assessed by scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: For hips, mild corrosion was found on femoral head tapers, along with severe scratching on certain femoral heads. Knee implants exhibited low burnishing and scratching for both mechanisms. Roughness measurements (Sa) were 37.3 nm (interquartile range = 22.0 to 62.4) for hips and 85.3 nm (interquartile range = 66.3 to 110) for knees. The observed scratch depth in both hip and knee implants due to third-body particles ranged from 0.3 to 1.3 µm. The coating coverage remained intact in the majority of the implants, with 2 cases of small, localized cohesive chipping and substrate exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study confirm the potential in vivo durability of early TiN coatings and will be useful in benchmarking wear tests for modern TiN-coated orthopaedic implants.

The Modified Harrington Procedure for Metastatic Peri-Acetabular Bone Lesion Using a Novel Highly Porous Titanium Revision Shell with Long Lever Arm Screw.

Background and Objectives: Peri-acetabular metastases often lead to significant pain and functional impairment. Surgical interventions, including the Harrington procedure, aim to address these challenges. This study evaluates a modified Harrington procedure using the MUTARS® PRS® (Pelvic Revision Shell) with an 8 mm fixation screw for severe acetabular defects resulting from metastatic lesions. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of 12 patients treated between January 2020 and December 2023 was conducted. The procedure involved using the novel MUTARS® PRS® with an 8 mm in diameter dome screw (length 70-100 mm). Outcome measures included implant positioning changes, complication rates, functional outcomes, implant longevity, and patient survival. Radiological assessments were performed postoperatively, with follow-ups at 3, 6, 12 months, and annually thereafter. Results: Average follow-up was 15 ± 11 months, with 67% patient survival at 1 year and 44% at 2 years. Implant survivorship remained 100%. Harris Hip Score improved significantly from 37 ± 22 preoperatively to 75 ± 15 at the last follow-up. No revisions involving implant components were reported. Complications occurred in 5 of 12 patients. Overall, PRS® demonstrates effective osseous ingrowth, high primary stability, immediate full weight-bearing, and low complication rates. Conclusions: PRS® integrates facilitating osseous ingrowth for preferable long-term outcomes, while efficiently transmitting the weight-bearing load to the intact aspect of the pelvis using a long 8 mm lever screw, enhancing the primary stability of the construct. It proves to be an effective and reproducible technique for managing destructive metastatic lesions of the acetabulum and peri-acetabular region, even in irradiated bone.

Long-Term Outcomes and a Radiological Assessment of Hydroxyapatite-Tricalcium Phosphate-Coated Total Hip Arthroplasty (Trilogy/Zimmer): A Long-Term Follow-Up Study.

Background and Objectives: Favorable short- and mid-term results for hydroxyapatite (HA)-tricalcium phosphate (TCP)-coated total hip arthroplasty (THA) (Trilogy/Zimmer) have been reported in the literature; however, the long-term results beyond 15 years have not been documented. Therefore, this study evaluated the long-term postoperative results, radiological bone changes, and implant fixation of the acetabular component of HA-TCP-coated THA. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 212 patients who underwent primary HA-TCP-coated THA (Trilogy/Zimmer) at our institution between 1 October 2002, and 31 March 2008; 166 who were available for follow-up at least 15 years postoperatively were included (capture rate: 78.3%). All implants were Trilogy/Zimmer. We investigated the survival rate, with aseptic loosening as the endpoint. Clinical evaluations included the presence of dislocation and a modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) preoperatively and at the final observation. Results: The mean age at surgery and at the follow-up period were 57.7 ± 9.6 and 17.1 ± 1.5 years, respectively. The survival rate was 99.4% (165/166), with aseptic loosening as the endpoint. Dislocation was observed in 4/166 (2.4%) patients. The mHHS improved significantly from 46.1 points preoperatively to 82.2 points during the last survey (p < 0.05). The results revealed that fixation was favorable in all cases except for one case of aseptic loosening. The Trilogy implant coated with HA-TCP was highly effective in bone induction, and bone ingrowth was considered to have occurred without failure, further indicating its usefulness. The long-term results of cementless THA using an HA-TCP coating (Trilogy/Zimmer), with a mean follow-up period of 17.1 years, revealed a commendable survival rate of 99.4%, considering aseptic loosening as the endpoint. Conclusions: HA-TCP-coated THA (Trilogy/Zimmer) had good long-term results. However, further long-term observation is required in patients who have undergone this surgery, and the stem side should be evaluated and investigated, including comorbidities.

Conversion Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in Managing Post-traumatic Arthritis With Retained Femoral Hardware: A Case Report.

CASE: A 70-year-old man with a year-long history of arthritic pain in his left hip presented to our clinic. He had a left intertrochanteric hip fracture 6 years ago, fixed with an open reduction internal fixation with a cephalomedullary nail. He underwent a conversion Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) with removal of the proximal helicoidal blade and retention of the intramedullary nail. At 7-year follow-up, the patient reported satisfactory clinical outcomes and excellent radiographic fixation. CONCLUSION: This case highlights using conversion BHR in patients with post-traumatic arthritis with retained femoral hardware as an alternative to conventional total hip arthroplasty.

Impact of fixation method on femoral bone loss: a retrospective evaluation of stem loosening in first-time revision total hip arthroplasty among two hundred and fifty five patients.

PURPOSE: Implant loosening represent the most common indication for stem revision in hip revision arthroplasty. This study compares femoral bone loss and the risk of initial revisions between cemented and uncemented loosened primary stems, investigating the impact of fixation method at primary implantation on femoral bone defects. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed 255 patients who underwent their first revision for stem loosening from 2010 to 2022, receiving either cemented or uncemented stem implants. Femoral bone loss was preoperatively measured using the Paprosky classification through radiographic evaluations. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated the survival probability of the original stem, and the hazard ratio assessed the relative risk of revision for uncemented versus cemented stems in the first postoperative year and the following two to ten years. RESULTS: Cemented stems showed a higher prevalence of significant bone loss (type 3b and 4 defects: 32.39% vs. 2.72%, p < .001) compared to uncemented stems, which more commonly had type 1 and 2 defects (82.07% vs. 47.89%, p < .001). In our analysis of revision cases, primary uncemented stems demonstrated a 20% lower incidence of stem loosening in the first year post-implantation compared to cemented stems (HR 0.8; 95%-CI 0.3-2.0). However, the incidence in uncemented stems increased by 20% during the subsequent years two to ten (HR 1.2; 95%-CI 0.7-1.8). Septic loosening was more common in cemented stems (28.17% vs. 10.87% in uncemented stems, p = .001). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated a modestly longer revision-free period for cemented stems within the first ten years post-implantation (p < .022). CONCLUSION: During first-time revision, cemented stems show significantly larger femoral bone defects than uncemented stems. Septic stem loosening occurred 17.30% more in cemented stems.

Acute Periprosthetic Hip Fractures With Short, Uncemented Femoral Stems.

BACKGROUND: Uncemented femoral stems in hip arthroplasty have shown excellent long-term results, and several systematic studies indicate satisfactory performance of short stems. However, biomechanical and finite element analysis studies have suggested that shorter stems allow greater micromotion, producing greater strain at the implant-bone interface, which potentially increases the risk for periprosthetic fracture (PPF). We sought to assess this risk within our unit. METHODS: Our institution's arthroplasty database was searched for all primary total hip arthroplasties using short femoral stems performed between July 14, 2009 and August 29, 2022. The overall PPF rate and the PPF rate for individual femoral stems were established. Preoperative X-rays for each case were analyzed to characterize individual proximal femoral geometry. A data analysis was performed to identify risk factors for PPF. RESULTS: For the time period assessed, 3,192 short femoral stems were implanted. This included 1,561 of stem A and 1,631 of stem B. Women constituted 55.37% of the cohort. The average patient age was 66 years (range, 22 to 95). The PPF rate was 0.6%, with 19 PPFs identified at a follow-up of 3 months. There was a significantly higher fracture rate in stem A (0.96%) compared to stem B (0.25%) (P ≤ .01). Proximal femoral geometry, age, and sex were not determined to be risk factors for PPF in our cohort. Individual surgeons and surgical approaches appeared to confer no increased risk. There was no significant difference in average stem length, but multivariate analysis identified stem type and stem length as an independent risk factor for PPF. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified individual stem and stem length as independent risk factors for PPF within our cohort. PPF is a multifactorial issue, and consensus on emerging risk factors such as implant design will hopefully inform decisions that can provide further risk reduction for individual patients.

Surgical Approach Does Not Influence Instability Risk in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Although the direct anterior (DA) approach has increased in popularity for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), there is limited evidence regarding its use for revision THA. It is unknown whether the dislocation benefit seen in the primary setting translates to revision cases. METHODS: This retrospective review compared the dislocation rates of revision THA performed through DA versus postero-lateral (PL) approaches at a single institution (2011 to 2021). Exclusion criteria included revision for instability, ≥ 2 prior revisions, approaches other than DA or PL, and placement of dual-mobility or constrained liners. There were 182 hips in 173 patients that met the inclusion criteria. The average follow-up was 6.5 years (range, 2 to 8 years). RESULTS: There was a trend toward more both-component revisions being performed through the PL approach. There were no differences in dislocation rates between the DA revision and PL revision cohorts, which were 8.1% (5 of 72) and 7.5% (9 of 120), respectively (P = .999). Dislocation trended lower when the revision approach was discordant from the primary approach compared to cases where primary and revision had a concordant approach (4.9 versus 8.5%), but this was not statistically significant (P = .740). No significant differences were found in return to operating room, 90-day emergency department visits, or 90-day readmissions. However, the length of stay was significantly shorter in patients who had DA revisions after a primary PL procedure (P = .021). CONCLUSIONS: Dislocation rates following revision THA did not differ between the DA and PL approaches irrespective of the primary approach. Surgeons should choose their revision approach based on their experience and the specific needs of the patient.

A new seven-axis robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty system improves component positioning: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.

This study compared the radiologic and clinical outcomes of a new seven-axis robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) and conventional THA. Hundred and four patients were randomly assigned to two groups-the robotic-assisted THA group (RAS group) and the conventional THA group (CON group). The preoperative and postoperative Harris Hip score (HHS), acetabular inclination, anteversion, femoral offset, and leg length discrepancy (LLD) were compared. During the follow-up, no patients had any complications that could be associated with the use of the robot. The proportion of acetabular cups in the safety zone was significantly higher in the RAS group than that in the CON group. The two groups had significantly different mean absolute difference of inclination and anteversion. There was no significant difference in the postoperative HHSs, changes in HHSs, femoral offset, and lower limb length between the two groups. The seven-axis robotic-assisted THA system is safe and effective, and leads to better acetabulum cup positioning compared to conventional THA. The improvements observed in the HHS, LLD, and femoral offset in the RAS group were similar to those in the CON group.Clinical trial registration time: 19/05/2022.Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2200060115.

Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular Fluted Tapered Stems: Long-Term Follow-up of 515 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Modular fluted tapered (MFT) femoral components are frequently utilized in aseptic revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs). However, long-term follow-up has been limited. The purpose of this study was to update our prior series at long-term follow-up, with specific emphasis on implant survivorship, radiographic results, and complications in a large cohort of aseptic revision THAs using MFT stems. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 515 aseptic femoral revisions performed with 2 MFT stem designs in the total joint registry of a single tertiary care academic institution from 1999 to 2013. Serial radiographs were reviewed for subsidence of >5 mm. The mean follow-up (and standard deviation) was 10 ± 5 years (range, 2 to 21 years). A competing risk model accounting for death was utilized. RESULTS: The 15-year cumulative incidence of any revision was 12%. There were 57 revisions, 27 of which involved revision of the fluted tapered component (FTC). Dislocation (n = 19), periprosthetic joint infection (n = 15), and aseptic loosening of the FTC (n = 11) were the most common reasons for revision. The 15-year cumulative incidence of any reoperation was 16%. The 15-year cumulative incidences were 6% for any FTC revision and 2% for FTC revision for aseptic loosening. Stem subsidence of >5 mm occurred in 2% of unrevised cases, and all but 1 stem was stable at the most recent follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This large series of MFT stems used in aseptic revision THAs had a 2% incidence of subsequent revision of the FTC for aseptic loosening at 15 years. Dislocation and infection were the most common reasons for any revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

An Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy Is Necessary for the Removal of Broken Modular Metaphyseal Engaging Femoral Stems.

BACKGROUND: Modular metaphyseal engaging (MME) femoral components in total hip arthroplasty (THA) allow optimized femoral length, offset, and anteversion and are useful in patients with unusual proximal femoral anatomy. Fretting, corrosion, and stem fractures above the modular sleeve are complications associated with these implants. The purpose of this study was to identify failure mechanisms of retrieved MME femoral components at our institution, identify all broken stem cases, and evaluate how often an extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) was required for removal. METHODS: All consecutively retrieved MME femoral components from September 2002 to May 2023 were reviewed. Patient demographics, procedure information, component specifications, indications for removal, and requirements for further revision surgery were reviewed. Descriptive statistics were calculated for variables of interest. RESULTS: There were 131 retrieved MME components. The mean age at surgery was 59 years (range, 28 to 75), 49% were women, mean body mass index was 29.4 (range, 20.7 to 33.3), and mean American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 2.4 ± 0.5. There were 102 (78%) stems of 1 design (stem A), and 29 (22%) stems of a different design (stem B). Of 131 components, 10 (7.6%) failed secondary to stem fracture proximal to the modular sleeve. Four of 102 (4%) of stem A and 6 of 29 (21% of stem B) fractured. All broken stems required additional intervention for removal during revision THA, using an ETO (N = 9) or cortical window (N = 1) in which an intraoperative proximal femoral fracture occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Broken MME stems present a challenge for orthopaedic surgeons during revision THA. When a stem fracture occurs above the ingrown sleeve, the distal splines may have osseous interdigitation into the clothespin. Thus, when revising a broken MME stem, an ETO should be performed, and the segment should be long enough to allow distal access.

Quasi-static mechanical evaluation of canine cementless total hip replacement broaches: effect of tooth design on broach and stem insertion.

BACKGROUND: Biomedtrix BFX® cementless total hip replacement (THR) requires the use of femoral broaches to prepare a press-fit envelope within the femur for subsequent stem insertion. Current broaches contain teeth that crush and remove cancellous bone; however, they are not particularly well-suited for broaching sclerotic (corticalized) cancellous bone. In this study, three tooth designs [Control, TG1 (additional V-grooves), TG2 (diamond tooth pattern)] were evaluated with a quasi-static testing protocol and polyurethane test blocks simulating normal and sclerotic bone. To mimic clinical broaching, a series of five sequential broach insertions were used to determine cumulative broaching energy (J) and peak loads during broach insertion. To determine the effect of broach tooth design on THR stem insertion, a BFX® stem was inserted into prepared test blocks and insertion and subsidence energy and peak loads were determined. RESULTS: Broach tooth design led to significant differences in broaching energy and peak broaching loads in test blocks of both densities. In low density test blocks, TG1 required the lowest cumulative broaching energy (10.76 ±0.29 J), followed by Control (12.18 ±1.20 J) and TG2 (16.66 ±0.78 J) broaches. In high density test blocks, TG1 required the lowest cumulative broaching energy (32.60 ±2.54 J) as compared to Control (33.25 ±2.16 J) and TG2 (59.97 ±3.07 J).  During stem insertion and subsidence testing, stem insertion energy for high density test blocks prepared with Control broaches was 14.53 ± 0.81 J, which was significantly lower than blocks prepared with TG1 (22.53 ± 1.04 J) or TG2 (19.38 ± 3.00 J) broaches. For stem subsidence testing in high density blocks, TG1 prepared blocks required the highest amount of energy to undergo subsidence (14.49 ± 0.49 J), which was significantly greater than test blocks prepared with Control (11.09 ±0.09 J) or TG2 (12.57 ± 0.81 J) broaches. CONCLUSIONS: The additional V-grooves in TG1 broaches demonstrated improved broaching performance while also generating press-fit envelopes that were more resistant to stem insertion and subsidence. TG1 broaches may prove useful in the clinical setting; however additional studies that more closely simulate clinical broach impaction are necessary prior to making widespread changes to THR broaches.

The effect of a collar on primary stability of standard and undersized cementless hip stems: a biomechanical study.

INTRODUCTION: Aseptic loosening and periprosthetic fractures are main reasons for revision after THA. Quite different from most other stem systems, Corail cementless hip stems show better survival rates than their cemented counterpart, which can possibly be explained by the use of a collar. The study aimed to investigate primary stability with standard and undersized hip stems both collared and collarless. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Primary stability of cementless, collared and collarless, femoral stems was measured in artificial bones using both undersized and standard size. After preconditioning, 3D micromotion was measured under cyclic loading at the bone-implant interface. RESULTS: The use of a collar resulted in higher micromotion within the same stem size but showed no statistically significant difference for both standard and undersized hip stems. The collared and collarless undersized stems showed no significant differences in 3D micromotion at the upper measuring positions compared to the standard stem size. Micromotion was significantly higher in the distal measuring positions, with and without collar, for the undersized stems (vs. standard collarless stem size). CONCLUSION: The key finding is that the collarless and collared Corail hip stems, within one stem size, showed no significant differences in primary stability. Undersized stems showed significantly higher micromotion in the distal area both with and without collar.