Incidence and type of adverse events in patients with cirrhosis receiving terlipressin: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Terlipressin has been widely used for various cirrhosis-related complications, but its safety profile remains controversial. Herein, this issue was systematically evaluated. METHODS: All studies reporting adverse events (AEs) of terlipressin in cirrhosis were screened. Incidences were pooled using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the patient's characteristics and treatment regimens. Interaction among subgroups was evaluated. RESULTS: Seventy-eight studies with 7257 patients with cirrhosis were included. The pooled incidences of any AEs, treatment-related AEs, any serious AEs (SAEs), treatment-related SAEs, treatment withdrawal due to AEs, and treatment withdrawal due to treatment-related AEs were 31%, 22%, 5%, 5%, 4%, and 4% in patients with cirrhosis receiving terlipressin, respectively. Patients with hepatorenal syndrome had higher incidences of any SAEs (29% vs. 0% vs. 0%, pinteraction = 0.01) and treatment-related SAEs (8% vs. 1% vs. 7%, pinteraction = 0.02) than those with variceal bleeding or ascites. Patients who received terlipressin with human albumin had higher incidences of any SAEs (18% vs. 1%, pinteraction = 0.04) and treatment-related SAEs (7% vs. 0%, pinteraction = 0.09) than those without albumin. Patients with total bilirubin level >4.3 mg/dL had higher incidences of any AEs (69% vs. 24%, pinteraction = 0.02), any SAEs (64% vs. 0%, pinteraction < 0.01), and treatment-related SAEs (8% vs. 1%, pinteraction = 0.04) than those ≤4.3 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS: AEs are common in patients with cirrhosis receiving terlipressin and influenced by clinical scenarios, combination with albumin, and bilirubin levels.

Clinical characteristics and predictors of benign portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis: A retrospective single-center study.

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a common thrombotic complication of cirrhosis. It can lead to variceal bleeding and bowel ischemia and also complicate liver transplantation. Identifying the possible risk factors associated with PVT can aid in identifying patients at high risk, enabling their screening and potentially preventing PVT through the rational use of anticoagulants. This study focuses on examining the clinical characteristics of PVT in cirrhotic patients and identifying the clinical and biochemical factors that are linked to the development of PVT. Consecutive hospitalized cirrhotic patients between 2015 and 2023 were identified through the hospital's computerized medical records based on the Tenth Revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10) coding system and retrospectively analyzed. 928 individuals were included in this study; 783 (84.3%) without PVT and 145 (15.7%) with benign PVT. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) was significantly more common in the PVT group (P-value = .02), while alcohol and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) were less common in this group (P-value = .01 and .02, respectively). Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (P-value < .01), ascites (P-value = .01), and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) (P-value = .02) were more common in the PVT group. Patients with PVT had a higher international normalized ratio (INR) level (P-value = .042) and lower plasma albumin (P-value = .01). No differences were identified in white blood cell, hemoglobin, platelet, and bilirubin levels. However, patients with PVT had higher model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) (P-value = .01) and Child-Pugh scores (P-value = .03). This study demonstrated a higher likelihood of PVT presence in cirrhotic patients with advanced age, HBV, and HCC, along with ascites, SBP, splenomegaly, hypoalbuminemia, elevated INR, and a higher MELD score. Nevertheless, additional research endeavors are necessary to accurately ascertain and validate supplementary risk factors within a broader demographic.

Burden of Portal Hypertension Complications Is Greater in Liver Transplant Wait-Listed Registrants with End-Stage Liver Disease and Type 2 Diabetes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) awaiting liver transplantation (LT) remains poorly defined. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the relationship between T2DM and clinical outcomes among patients with LT waitlist registrants. We hypothesize that the presence of T2DM will be associated with worse clinical outcomes. METHODS: 593 patients adult (age 18 years or older) who were registered for LT between 1/2010 and 1/2017 were included in this retrospective analysis. The impact of T2DM on liver-associated clinical events (LACE), survival, hospitalizations, need for renal replacement therapy, and likelihood of receiving LT were evaluated over a 12-month period. LACE was defined as variceal hemorrhage, hepatic encephalopathy, and ascites. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis were used to determine the association between T2DM and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The baseline prevalence of T2DM was 32% (n = 191) and patients with T2DM were more likely to have esophageal varices (61% vs. 47%, p = 0.002) and history of variceal hemorrhage (23% vs. 16%, p = 0.03). The presence of T2DM was associated with increased risk of incident ascites (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.11, 3.28, p = 0.019). Patients with T2DM were more likely to require hospitalizations (56% vs. 49%, p = 0.06), hospitalized with portal hypertension-related complications (22% vs. 14%; p = 0.026), and require renal replacement therapy during their hospitalization. Patients with T2DM were less likely to receive a LT (37% vs. 45%; p = 0.03). Regarding MELD labs, patients with T2DM had significantly lower bilirubin at each follow-up; however, no differences in INR and creatinine were noted. CONCLUSION: Patients with T2DM are at increased risk of clinical outcomes. This risk is not captured in MELD score, which may potentially negatively affect their likelihood of receiving LT.

Prevalence and risk factors for cirrhotic cardiomyopathy: a prospective cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess cardiac structure and function in patients with cirrhosis, to investigate the prevalence of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM) in patients with cirrhosis of different etiologies and to analyze the risk factors for the development of CCM. METHODS: This study selected cirrhotic patients aged 18-75 years who were hospitalized in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. Patients with known heart disease, chronic lung disease, severe renal insufficiency, malignancy, thyroid disease, hypertension, diabetes or pregnancy were excluded. A total of 131 patients with cirrhosis were finally included. Based on the results of echocardiography, patients who met the diagnostic definition of CCM were included in the CCM group, otherwise, they were classified as the non-CCM group. The demographic and clinical data of the two groups were compared, and the clinical characteristics and risk factors of CCM were evaluated. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of CCM was 24.4%, and the occurrence of CCM was not related to the etiology of liver cirrhosis. The prevalence of CCM was significantly higher among cirrhotic patients complicated with ascites (31.4% vs. 16.4%; P  = 0.046) or with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) (42.9% vs. 17.1%; P  = 0.003). Older age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.058; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.005-1.113; P  = 0.032] and PVT (OR = 2.999; 95% CI, 1.194-7.533; P  = 0.019) were independent risk factors for the development of CCM. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of CCM in cirrhotic patients was 24.4%, and the occurrence of CCM was not related to the etiology of cirrhosis. The prevalence of CCM was higher in cirrhotic patients with ascites or PVT. Older age and PVT are independent risk factors for CCM, but validation in larger sample studies is still needed.

Risk factors for hospital readmission among patients with cirrhosis and ascites in China: a retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: In this investigation, we aimed to explore risk factors for 90-day hospital readmission among patients with cirrhosis and ascites in an Asian population. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included consecutive patients diagnosed with cirrhosis and ascites hospitalized in Renji Hospital between 2018 and 2022 to elucidate risk factors for 90-day readmission. We conducted multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify readmission risk factors. RESULTS: We included 265 patients with cirrhosis and ascites. A 43% readmission rate was observed within 90 days. After adjustment for multiple covariates, we found that readmission within 90 days was independently linked to reduced levels of hemoglobin (odds ratio [OR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94-0.97) and serum albumin (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83-0.93), and higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and sodium (MELD-Na) scores (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07) at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cirrhosis who have ascites are frequently rehospitalized within 90 days after discharge. Lower hemoglobin or albumin and higher MELD-Na scores at discharge may be the main risk factors for hospital readmission.

Optimal resting heart rate and ascites-related death in patients with cirrhosis and ascites using nonselective beta-blockers (ORCA).

Nonselective beta-blockers (NSBBs) may exacerbate ascites by impairing cardiac function. This study evaluated the impact of achieving a heart rate target of 55-60 beats per minute (bpm) on ascites-related death and complications from worsening ascites in patients with cirrhosis and diuretic-responsive ascites using NSBBs. A retrospective study was conducted at the Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University (2012-2022) and analyzed patients with cirrhosis and diuretic-responsive ascites using NSBBs (propranolol/carvedilol) for variceal bleeding prophylaxis. The outcomes were incidence of ascites-related death and complications from worsening ascites, comparing the achievable target group (heart rate 55-60 bpm) and the unachievable target group (heart rate >60 bpm). A total of 206 patients were included in the study, with a median follow-up time of 20 months. The patients were divided into an achievable target group (n = 75, median heart rate = 58.0 bpm) and an unachievable target group (n = 131, median heart rate = 73.6 bpm). Propranolol was the most used NSBB (95.1%). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for ascites-related death from spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) or refractory ascites (RA) or hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) or hepatic encephalopathy (HE) showed no difference between the groups (adjusted HR 0.59 [0.23-1.54]; p = 0.28). Additionally, no significant difference was found in the incidence of complications between groups, including SBP, RA, HRS, and HE. Achieving a heart rate target of 55-60 bpm with NSBBs for variceal bleeding prophylaxis is safe in patients with diuretic-responsive ascites and cirrhosis.

Further decompensation in cirrhosis: Results of a large multicenter cohort study supporting Baveno VII statements.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The prognostic weight of further decompensation in cirrhosis is still unclear. We investigated the incidence of further decompensation and its effect on mortality in patients with cirrhosis. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Multicenter cohort study. The cumulative incidence of further decompensation (development of a second event or complication of a decompensating event) was assessed using competing risks analysis in 2028 patients. A 4-state model was built: first decompensation, further decompensation, liver transplant, and death. A cause-specific Cox model was used to assess the adjusted effect of further decompensation on mortality. Sensitivity analyses were performed for patients included before or after 1999. In a mean follow-up of 43 months, 1192 patients developed further decompensation and 649 died. Corresponding 5-year cumulative incidences were 52% and 35%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of death and liver transplant after further decompensation were 55% and 9.7%, respectively. The most common further decompensating event was ascites/complications of ascites. Five-year probabilities of state occupation were 24% alive with first decompensation, 21% alive with further decompensation, 7% alive with a liver transplant, 16% dead after first decompensation without further decompensation, 31% dead after further decompensation, and <1% dead after liver transplant. The HR for death after further decompensation, adjusted for known prognostic indicators, was 1.46 (95% CI: 1.23-1.71) ( p <0.001). The significant impact of further decompensation on survival was confirmed in patients included before or after 1999. CONCLUSIONS: In cirrhosis, further decompensation occurs in ~60% of patients, significantly increases mortality, and should be considered a more advanced stage of decompensated cirrhosis.

Thirty-Day Readmissions Are Largely Not Preventable in Patients With Cirrhosis.

INTRODUCTION: Hospital readmissions are common in patients with cirrhosis, but there are few studies describing readmission preventability. We aimed to describe the incidence, causes, and risk factors for preventable readmission in this population. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of patients with cirrhosis hospitalized at a single center between June 2014 and March 2020 and followed up for 30 days postdischarge. Demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic data, functional status, and quality of life were collected. Readmission preventability was independently and systematically adjudicated by 3 reviewers. Multinomial logistic regression was used to compare those with (i) preventable readmission, (ii) nonpreventable readmission/death, and (iii) no readmission. RESULTS: Of 654 patients, 246 (38%) were readmitted, and 29 (12%) were preventable readmissions. Reviewers agreed on preventability for 70% of readmissions. Twenty-two (including 2 with preventable readmission) died. The most common reasons for readmission were hepatic encephalopathy (22%), gastrointestinal bleeding (13%), acute kidney injury (13%), and ascites (6%), and these reasons were similar between preventable and nonpreventable readmissions. Preventable readmission was often related to paracentesis timeliness, diuretic adjustment monitoring, and hepatic encephalopathy treatment. Compared with nonreadmitted patients, preventable readmission was independently associated with racial and ethnic minoritized individuals (odds ratio [OR] 5.80; 95% CI, 1.96-17.13), nonmarried marital status (OR 2.88; 95% CI, 1.18-7.05), and admission in the prior 30 days (OR 3.45; 95% CI, 1.48-8.04). DISCUSSION: For patients with cirrhosis, readmission is common, but most are not preventable. Preventable readmissions are often related to ascites and hepatic encephalopathy and are associated with racial and ethnic minorities, nonmarried status, and prior admissions.

Daily Low-Volume Paracentesis and Clinical Complications in Patients With Refractory Ascites.

Importance: The potential association of low-volume paracentesis of less than 5 L with complications in patients with ascites remains unclear, and individuals with cirrhosis and refractory ascites (RA) treated with devices like Alfapump or tunneled-intraperitoneal catheters perform daily low-volume drainage without albumin substitution. Studies indicate marked differences regarding the daily drainage volume between patients; however, it is currently unknown if this alters the clinical course. Objective: To determine whether the incidence of complications, such as hyponatremia or acute kidney injury (AKI), is associated with the daily drainage volume in patients with devices. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study of patients with liver cirrhosis, RA, and a contraindication for a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt who received either device implantation or standard of care (SOC; ie, repeated large-volume paracentesis with albumin infusion), and were hospitalized between 2012 and 2020 were included. Data were analyzed from April to October 2022. Interventions: Daily ascites volume removed. Main outcomes and Measures: The primary end points were 90-day incidence of hyponatremia and AKI. Propensity score matching was performed to match and compare patients with devices and higher or lower drainage volumes to those who received SOC. Results: Overall, 250 patients with RA receiving either device implantation (179 [72%] patients; 125 [70%] male; 54 [30%] female; mean [SD] age, 59 [11] years) or SOC (71 [28%] patients; 41 [67%] male; 20 [33%] female; mean [SD] age, 54 [8]) were included in this study. A cutoff of 1.5 L/d or more was identified to estimate hyponatremia and AKI in the included patients with devices. Drainage of 1.5 L/d or more was associated with hyponatremia and AKI, even after adjusting for various confounders (hazard ratio [HR], 2.17 [95% CI, 1.24-3.78]; P = .006; HR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.01-2.16]; P = .04, respectively). Moreover, patients with taps of 1.5 L/d or more and less than 1.5 L/d were matched with patients receiving SOC. Those with taps of 1.5 L/d or more had a higher risk of hyponatremia and AKI compared with those receiving SOC (HR, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.06-2.68]; P = .02 and HR, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.04-2.18]; P = .03), while patients with drainage of less than 1.5 L/d did not show an increased rate of complications compared with those receiving SOC. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, clinical complications in patients with RA performing low-volume drainage without albumin infusion were associated with the daily volume drained. Based on this analysis, physicians should be cautious in patients performing drainage of 1.5 L/d or more without albumin infusion.

Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis among Chronic Liver Disease Patients with Ascites Admitted to the Department of Medicine of a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

Introduction: Chronic liver disease is a common problem worldwide. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is a dreaded complication and has high in-hospital mortality. Few studies have been done about the prevalence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and associated clinical and biochemical features in a hospital-based population. The aim of this study was to find out the prevalence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in chronic liver disease patients with ascites admitted to Department of Medicine in a tertiary care centre. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was done among patients with chronic liver disease with ascites admitted to the Department of Medicine of a tertiary care centre between 18 March 2021 to 28 February 2022 after receiving ethical approval from the Institutional Review Committee (Reference number: PMM2103161493). Convenience sampling method was used. Diagnostic paracentesis was done in every such patient. Point estimate and 95% Confidence Interval were calculated. Results: Among 157 patients, the prevalence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis was 46 (29.29%) (22.17-36.41, 95% Confidence Interval). The most common presenting symptom was pain abdomen seen in 29 (63.04%). Conclusions: The prevalence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in chronic liver disease patients with ascites was similar to studies done in similar settings. Clinicians should be aware that it can present with or without abdominal pain. Keywords: ascites; liver diseases; peritonitis; prevalence.

The incidence and natural history of ascites after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Ascites is common in cirrhosis but uncommon after liver transplant. We aimed to characterize the incidence, natural history, and current management strategies of post-transplant ascites. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent liver transplantation at 2 centers. We included patients who underwent deceased donor whole graft liver transplants between 2002 and 2019. Chart review identified patients with post-transplant ascites, requiring a paracentesis between 1 and 6-month post-transplants. Detailed chart review identified clinical and transplant characteristics, evaluation of ascites etiology, and treatments. RESULTS: Of 1591 patients who successfully underwent a first-time orthotopic liver transplant for chronic liver disease, 101 (6.3%) developed post-transplant ascites. Only 62% of these patients required large volume paracentesis for ascites before transplant. 36% of patients with post-transplant ascites had early allograft dysfunction. Most patients with post-transplant ascites (73%) required a paracentesis within 2 months of transplant, but 27% had delayed ascites onset. From 2002 to 2019, ascites studies were obtained less often, and hepatic vein pressure measurement was performed more often. Diuretics were the mainstay of treatment (58%). The use of albumin infusion and splenic artery embolization to treat post-transplant ascites increased over time. Larger pre-transplant spleen size was associated with a greater number of post-transplant paracenteses (r=0.32 and p=0.003). For patients who underwent splenic intervention, paracentesis frequency was significantly reduced (1.6-0.4 paracenteses/month, p=0.0001). The majority (72%) of patients had clinical resolution of their ascites at 6-month post-transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent or recurrent ascites continues to be a clinical issue in the modern era of liver transplantation. Most had clinical resolution within 6 months, some requiring intervention.

Low back pain in patients hospitalised with liver cirrhosis- a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Lower back pain is a common issue, but little is known about the prevalence of pain in patients with liver cirrhosis during hospitalisation. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine lower back pain in patients with liver cirrhosis. METHODS: The sample consisted of patients with liver cirrhosis (n = 79; men n = 55; women n = 24; mean age = 55.79 ± 12.52 years). The hospitalised patients were mobile. The presence and intensity of pain were assessed in the lumbar spine during hospitalisation. The presence of pain was assessed using the visual analogue pain scale (0-10). The range of motion of the lower spine was assessed using the Schober and Stibor tests. Frailty was measured by Liver Frailty Index (LFI). The condition of liver disease was evaluated using The Model For the End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and Child-Pugh score (CPS) and ascites classification. Student's t test and Mann-Whitney test were used for analysis of the difference of group. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Tukey post hoc test was used to test differences between categories of liver frailty index. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to test pain distribution. Statistical significance was determined at the α-0.05 significance level. RESULT: The prevalence of pain in patients with liver cirrhosis was 13.92% (n = 11), and the mean intensity of pain according to the visual analogue scale was 3.73 (± 1.90). Lower back pain was present in patients with ascites (15.91%; n = 7) and without ascites (11.43%; n = 4). The prevalence of lower back pain was not statistically significant between patients with and without ascites (p = 0,426). The base of Schober's assessment mean score was 3.74 cm (± 1.81), and based on Stibor's assessment mean score was 5.84 cm (± 2.23). CONCLUSION: Lower back pain in patients with liver cirrhosis is a problem that requires attention. Restricted spinal mobility has been reported in patients with back pain, according to Stibor, compared to patients without pain. There was no difference in the incidence of pain in patients with and without ascites.

Clinical risk factors for ascites in metastatic pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Malignant ascites is common in metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) and its management still remains a clinical challenge. Early identification of patients at risk for ascites development may support and guide treatment decisions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of patients treated for mPC at the Medical University of Vienna between 2010 and 2019 were collected by retrospective chart review. Ascites was defined as clinically relevant accumulation of intraperitoneal fluid diagnosed by ultrasound or computer tomography scan of the abdomen. We investigated the association between general risk factors, metastatic sites, liver function, systemic inflammation as well as portal vein obstruction (PVO) and ascites development. RESULTS: Among 581 patients with mPC included in this study, 122 (21.0%) developed ascites after a median of 8.7 months after diagnosis of metastatic disease. The occurrence of ascites led to an 8.9-fold increased risk of death [confidence interval (CI) 7.2-11, P < 0.001] with a median overall survival of 1 month thereafter. Clinical risk factors for ascites were male sex [hazard ratio (HR) 1.71, CI 1.00-2.90, P = 0.048], peritoneal carcinomatosis (HR 6.79, CI 4.09-11.3, P < 0.001), liver metastases (HR 2.16, CI 1.19-3.91, P = 0.011), an albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score grade 3 (HR 6.79, CI 2.11-21.8, P = 0.001), PVO (HR 2.28, CI 1.15-4.52, P = 0.019), and an elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) (HR 4.19, CI 1.58-11.1, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Survival after diagnosis of ascites is very limited in mPC patients. Male sex, liver and peritoneal metastases, impaired liver function, PVO, as well as systemic inflammation were identified as independent risk factors for ascites development in this uniquely large real-life patient cohort.

Nodular Regenerative Hyperplasia Is Not a Rare Condition After Liver Transplantation: Incidence, Predictive Factors, and Impact on Survival.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to evaluate incidence and to identify the risk factors of occurrence and the predictive factors of symptomatic forms of nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) after liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: To identify risk factors of NRH following LT, we included 1648 patients transplanted from 2004 to 2018 and compared the patients developing NRH after LT to those who did not. To identify predictive factors of symptomatic NRH, we selected 115 biopsies displaying NRH and compared symptomatic to asymptomatic forms. Symptomatic NRH was defined as the presence of ascites, esophageal varices, hepatic encephalopathy, portal thrombosis, retransplantation, or death related to NRH. RESULTS: The incidence of NRH following LT was 5.1%. In multivariate analysis, the independent factor of developing NRH after LT was the donor's age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.02; confidence interval, 1.01-1.03; P = 0.02). Symptomatic forms occurred in 29 (25.2%) patients: 19 (16.5%) patients presented with ascites, 13 (11.3%) with esophageal varices, 4 (3.5%) with hepatic encephalopathy, and 8 (7%) with portal thrombosis. The median period before the onset of symptoms was 8.4 (1.5-11.3) y after LT. The spleen size at diagnosis/before LT ratio (OR = 12.5; 114.17-1.37; P = 0.0252) and thrombectomy during transplantation (OR = 11.17; 1.48-84.11; P = 0.0192) were associated with symptomatic NRH in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: NRH following LT is frequent (5.1%) and leads to symptomatic portal hypertension in 25.2% of patients. Using older grafts increases the risk of developing NRH after LT. Clinicians should screen for signs of portal hypertension, particularly in measuring spleen size.

Portal Hypertension among Patients with Chronic Liver Disease Admitted to the Department of Internal Medicine of a Tertiary Care Centre.

Introduction: Portal hypertension is increased pressure within the portal vein. A portal pressure gradient of more than 10 mmHg is defined as "clinically significant portal hypertension" due to manifestations such as splenomegaly, gastroesophageal varices, ascites, hepatorenal syndrome, hepatopulmonary syndrome, hepatic encephalopathy, and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. The aim of this study was to find out the prevalence of portal hypertension among patients with chronic liver disease admitted to the Department of Internal Medicine of a tertiary care centre. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among patients with chronic liver disease in the Department of Internal Medicine of a tertiary care centre from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2022 after obtaining ethical approval from the Institutional Review Committee. Convenience sampling method was used. The point estimate was calculated at a 95% Confidence Interval. Results: Among 247 patients with chronic liver disease, the prevalence of portal hypertension was 38 (15.38%) (10.88-19.88, 95% Confidence Interval). A total of 16 (42.11%) patients were in the age group of 51-60 years and males were 36 (94.74%). Ascites as a complication were found in 4 (10.53%). Conclusions: The prevalence of portal hypertension among chronic liver disease inpatients in a tertiary care centre was found to be lower than other studies done in international settings. Keywords: inpatients; liver disease; portal hypertension; prevalence.

Characterization of patients with acutely decompensated cirrhosis who received care in different highly complex emergency services of Medellín, Colombia. / Caracterización de los pacientes con cirrosis agudamente descompensada que consultaron a diferentes servicios de urgencias de alta complejidad en Medellín, Colombia

INTRODUCTION: Cirrhosis is one of the ten leading causes of death in the Western hemisphere and entails a significant cost of health care. OBJECTIVE: To describe the sociodemographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of patients older than 18 years who received care for acute decompensation of cirrhosis in the emergency services of three highly complex centers in Medellín, Colombia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an observational retrospective cohort study from clinical records. The results were analyzed by frequency measures and represented in tables and graphics. RESULTS: In total, 576 clinical records met the inclusion criteria; 287 were included for analysis, and 58.9% were men, with an average age of 64 (± 13.5) years. The most frequent causes of cirrhosis were alcohol intake (47.7%), cryptogenic or unspecified etiology (29.6%), and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (9.1%). The main reasons for visiting the emergency department were the presence of edema and/or ascites (34.1%), suspicion of gastrointestinal bleeding (26.5%), abdominal pain (14.3%) and altered mental status (13.9%). The most frequent clinical manifestations of an acute decompensation of cirrhosis were ascites (45.6%), variceal hemorrhage (25.4%), hepatic encephalopathy (23.0%), and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (5.2%). During their treatment, 56.1% of the patients received intravenous antibiotics; 24.0%, human albumin; 24.0%, vasoactive support, and 27.5%, blood products; 21.3% required management in an intensive or intermediate care unit, registering 53 deceased patients for a mortality of 18.5%. CONCLUSION: Patients who consult the emergency services due to acute decompensation of cirrhosis demand a high amount of health resources, frequently present associated complications, and a high percentage requires management in critical care units and shows a high in-hospital mortality rate.

Introducción. La cirrosis hace parte de las diez primeras causas de muerte en el hemisferio occidental y acarrea un importante costo en salud. Objetivo. Describir las características sociodemográficas, clínicas y de laboratorio, de los pacientes mayores de 18 años que recibieron atención por descompensación aguda de la cirrosis en los servicios de urgencias de tres centros de alta complejidad en Medellín, Colombia. Materiales y métodos. Se trata de un estudio observacional de cohorte. Los resultados se analizaron mediante medidas de frecuencia, y se representaron en tablas y gráficas. Resultados. En total, en 576 registros clínicos se cumplieron los criterios de inclusión; se incluyeron 287 para el análisis. El 58,9 % fueron hombres, con edad promedio de 64 (±13,5) años. Las causas más frecuentes de cirrosis fueron: ingestión de alcohol (47,7 %), criptogénica o inespecífica (29,6 %) y enfermedad por hígado graso no alcohólico (9,1 %). Los principales motivos de consulta fueron: presencia de edemas, ascitis o ambas (34,1 %), sospecha de hemorragia digestiva (26,5 %), dolor abdominal (14,3 %) y alteración del estado mental (13,9 %). Los diagnósticos de complicación aguda más frecuentes fueron ascitis (45,6 %), hemorragia digestiva por várices esofágicas (25,4 %), encefalopatía hepática (23,0 %) y peritonitis bacteriana espontánea (5,2 %). El 56,1 % de los pacientes recibió antibióticos; el 24,0 %, albúmina humana; el 24,0 % medicamentos, y el 27,5 % hemoderivados. En el 21,3 % de los casos, se requirió hospitalización en la unidad de cuidados intensivos o en la de cuidados intermedios. Se registraron 53 decesos, para una mortalidad del 18,5 %. Conclusiones. Los pacientes que consultan a los servicios de urgencias por una descompensación aguda de la cirrosis demandan una gran cantidad de recursos, frecuentemente presentan complicaciones asociadas, requieren manejo en unidades de cuidado crítico y evidencian una alta tasa de mortalidad.

Real-world clinical features, health-care utilization, and economic burden in decompensated cirrhosis patients: A national database.

BACKGROUND: Patients with decompensated cirrhosis are well known to experience morbidity and mortality. AIM: We assessed clinical characteristics, health-care utilization, and economic burden according to the type, number, and combination of decompensation-related complications. METHODS: We used recent nationally representative sample data from 2016 to 2018, covering approximately 13% of hospitalized patients in South Korea annually. Decompensation-related complications included ascites, hepatic encephalopathy (HE), gastroesophageal variceal (GEV) bleeding, and hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). RESULTS: Among 14 601 patients with decompensated cirrhosis, 11 201 (76.7%) experienced ≥ 1 decompensation-related complications, and approximately three-quarters underwent hospitalization. The most prevalent decompensation-related complications were ascites (54.8%), GEV bleeding (33.2%), HE (27.4%), and HRS (3.6%). Patients with GEV bleeding exhibited the highest hospitalization rate (95.7%), and patients with HE or HRS underwent hospitalization for 4 weeks/year due to decompensated cirrhosis. Hospitalization costs were 1.9 times higher in patients with HRS than in those with ascites alone ($9022 vs $4673; P < 0.01). Once patients developed decompensation-related complications, 41.3% had ≥ 2 types of decompensation-related complications. As the number of decompensation-related complications increased from 0 to ≥ 3, health-care utilization and economic burden significantly increased in a stepwise manner; patients with ascites, GEV bleeding, and HE visited medical institutions 2.2 times more (11 vs 5/year; P < 0.01) and incurred 6.4 times greater medical expenditure ($11 060 vs $1728/year; P < 0.01) than those with ascites only. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of patients had multiple decompensation-related complications and socioeconomic burdens for decompensated cirrhosis considering admission rate, hospital stay, and costs increased markedly, depending on the number of decompensation-related complications.

Spontaneous Ascitic Fluid Infection: Are we Experiencing an Epidemiological shift in Causative Organisms?

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous ascitic fluid infection (SAI) is common in cirrhotic patients leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Third-generation cephalosporins are currently recommended as first-line therapy. This is a retrospective observational study that aims to determine bacterial etiology, susceptibility patterns of SAI, and its correlation with model for end-stage liver disease-sodium (MELD-Na) and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was conducted on 274 consecutive cases admitted in Bombay Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India. Cases of cirrhosis (irrespective of etiology) with ascites between the ages of 18-85 years were included in this study. Ascitic fluid of every patient was aspirated under all aseptic measures and was sent for biochemical, culture, and cytological analysis. RESULTS: Of the 274 patients studied, 34 (12.4%) patients were diagnosed to have SAI. Culture-negative neutrocytic ascites (CNNA) was present in 27 patients, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) was present in six patients, and monomicrobial bacteriascites was seen in one patient. Mean age of patients enrolled was 56.05 ± 2.47 years. Eighty-two percent were males and 18% were females. Alcohol (45.45%) was the leading cause of cirrhosis followed by nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) related cirrhosis (26.47.7%) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) related cirrhosis (11.46%) and cryptogenic cirrhosis (8.82%). Average MELD-Na score was 25 and the CTP class C was most common. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most commonly isolated organism followed by Escherichia coli. The various factors that predispose to development of SBP include low ascitic fluid protein concentration, a high level of serum bilirubin, deranged serum creatinine, high Child-Pugh score, and high MELD-Na score. CONCLUSION: Ascitic fluid analysis remains the single most important test for identifying and assessing a course of SBP. Early diagnosis and treatment will reduce the mortality rate in these patients.

Epidemiology of ascites fluid infections in patients with cirrhosis in Queensland, Australia from 2008 to 2017: A population-based study.

ABSTRACT: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), a common infection in patients with cirrhosis and ascites, is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to investigate changes in the epidemiology of ascites fluid infections over time in an Australian population, including patient demographics, trends in mortality, length of hospital stay and the nature and antibiotic resistance profile of causative organisms.An observational descriptive population-based epidemiological study of patients with cirrhosis admitted to public hospitals in Queensland during 2008-2017 was performed, linking demographic/clinical and microbiology data.Among 103,165 hospital admissions of patients with cirrhosis, ascites was present in 16,550 and in 60% (9977) a sample of ascitic fluid was tested. SBP was diagnosed in 770 admissions (neutrophil count >250/ml) and bacterascites in 552 (neutrophil count <250/ml with positive culture). The number of admissions with an ascites fluid infection increased by 76% from 2008 to 2017, paralleling an 84% increase in cirrhosis admissions over the same timeframe. Patients with SBP had a longer hospital stay (median 15.7 vs 8.3 days for patients without SBP, P < .001) and higher in-hospital mortality, although this decreased from 39.5% in 2008 to 2010 to 24.8% in 2015 to 2017 (P < .001). Common Gram-positive isolates included coagulase negative staphylococci (37.9%), viridans group streptococci (12.1%), and Staphylococcus aureus (7.2%). Common Gram-negative isolates included Escherichia coli (13.0%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (3.1%) and Enterobacter cloacae (2.6%). The prevalence of resistance to any tested antibiotic was <10%.SBP remains associated with high in-hospital mortality and long hospital stay. Typical skin and bowel pathogens were common, therefore, empirical antibiotic therapy should target these pathogens. This study provides valuable evidence informing infection management strategies in this vulnerable patient population.

Propranolol use in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites: A nationwide study.

Background: The impact of propranolol on patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites is controversial. We conducted a nationwide longitudinal cohort study to compare the survival between patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites, with and without using propranolol. Methods: Data of patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites using propranolol, and controls matched by age and gender, were extracted from The National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. The baseline demographic characteristics were compared between groups. Cox regression analysis was used to examine the predictors of mortality. Results: In this study, 1788 patients were enrolled in each group; 1304 patients (72.9%) in the propranolol group and 1445 patients (80.8%) in the control group died (P < 0.001). The mean survival was 34.3 ± 31.2 months in the propranolol group and 20.8 ± 26.6 months in the control group (P < 0.001). Propranolol (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.64, P < 0.001), statins (HR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.34-0.56, P < 0.001), age (HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.02, P < 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (HR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.05-1.24, P = 0.002) were the independent predictors for mortality. Conclusions: Use of propanolol was associated with reduced mortality, compared with controls, in this nationwide cohort of patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites.