RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Frozen shoulder is a prevalent condition among individuals in their middle and later years. Invasive therapy has shown promising results in the treatment of frozen shoulders, but its widespread adoption has been hampered by high costs and the need for advanced medical technology. As a result, patients with frozen shoulders often turn to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for symptomatic relief. However, the oral administration of NSAIDs can lead to troublesome adverse effects on the gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and urinary systems. In contrast, topical NSAIDs have gained attention for their excellent efficacy and lower adverse effects in various chronic pain conditions. Therefore, our study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of topical NSAIDs in improving pain and mobility among patients with frozen shoulders. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 108 patients experiencing moderate to severe pain and mobility impairment due to frozen shoulder were enrolled in this study. The participants were randomly assigned to either the experimental group (n=72) or the control group (n=36). The experimental group received daily treatment with the loxoprofen hydrogel patch (LOX-P) in addition to basic rehabilitation physiotherapy. The control group was treated with flurbiprofen cataplasm (FLU-C) twice a day, along with rehabilitation physiotherapy. The primary endpoint for evaluating the efficacy of the two patches was the Constant-Murley score (CMS). Clinical symptom data, adverse events, and patient satisfaction were also recorded. RESULTS: After 14 days of treatment, the effective rate was 66.67% (n=48) in the experimental group and 41.67% (n=15) in the control group. The overall difference in the effective rates was 25.00% (95% CI=5.20-42.52; p=0.013). The safety profiles of the two topical agents were similar, with only a few adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS: The loxoprofen hydrogel patch demonstrates a significant ability to alleviate shoulder pain and restore shoulder function in the treatment of frozen shoulder, with minimal adverse reactions. Chictr.org.cn ID: ChiCTR2100052375.
Asunto(s)
Administración Tópica , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos , Bursitis , Humanos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Bursitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Bursitis/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Fenilpropionatos/administración & dosificación , Fenilpropionatos/uso terapéutico , Fenilpropionatos/efectos adversos , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Flurbiprofeno/administración & dosificación , Flurbiprofeno/efectos adversos , Flurbiprofeno/uso terapéutico , AdultoAsunto(s)
Bursitis , Ozono , Articulación del Hombro , Humanos , Bursitis/terapia , Bursitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Inyecciones Intraarticulares/métodos , Ozono/administración & dosificación , Ozono/uso terapéutico , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Tratamiento de Radiofrecuencia Pulsada/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoAsunto(s)
Bursitis , Ozono , Humanos , Bursitis/terapia , Bursitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Inyecciones Intraarticulares/métodos , Ozono/administración & dosificación , Ozono/uso terapéutico , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Articulación del Hombro , Tratamiento de Radiofrecuencia Pulsada/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The Anti-Freaze-F (AFF) trial assessed the feasibility of conducting a definitive trial to determine whether intra-articular injection of adalimumab can reduce pain and improve function in people with pain-predominant early-stage frozen shoulder. DESIGN: Multicentre, randomised feasibility trial, with embedded qualitative study. SETTING: Four UK National Health Service (NHS) musculoskeletal and related physiotherapy services. PARTICIPANTS: Adults ≥18 years with new episode of shoulder pain attributable to early-stage frozen shoulder. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomised (centralised computer generated 1:1 allocation) to either ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection of: (1) adalimumab (160 mg) or (2) placebo (saline (0.9% sodium chloride)). Participants and outcome assessors were blinded to treatment allocation. Second injection of allocated treatment (adalimumab 80 mg) or equivalent placebo was administered 2-3 weeks later. PRIMARY FEASIBILITY OBJECTIVES: (1) Ability to screen and identify participants; (2) willingness of eligible participants to consent and be randomised; (3) practicalities of delivering the intervention; (4) SD of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) score and attrition rate at 3 months. RESULTS: Between 31 May 2022 and 7 February 2023, 156 patients were screened of whom 39 (25%) were eligible. The main reasons for ineligibility were other shoulder disorder (38.5%; n=45/117) or no longer in pain-predominant frozen shoulder (33.3%; n=39/117). Of the 39 eligible patients, nine (23.1%) consented to be randomised (adalimumab n=4; placebo n=5). The main reason patients declined was because they preferred receiving steroid injection (n=13). All participants received treatment as allocated. The mean time from randomisation to first injection was 12.3 (adalimumab) and 7.2 days (placebo). Completion rates for patient-reported and clinician-assessed outcomes were 100%. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that current NHS musculoskeletal physiotherapy settings yielded only small numbers of participants, too few to make a trial viable. This was because many patients had passed the early stage of frozen shoulder or had already formulated a preference for treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 27075727, EudraCT 2021-03509-23, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05299242 (REC 21/NE/0214).
Asunto(s)
Adalimumab , Bursitis , Estudios de Factibilidad , Dolor de Hombro , Humanos , Adalimumab/administración & dosificación , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inyecciones Intraarticulares , Bursitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Dolor de Hombro/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor de Hombro/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Dimensión del Dolor , Reino Unido , Ultrasonografía IntervencionalRESUMEN
Musculoskeletal conditions of the upper and lower extremities are commonly treated with corticosteroid injections. Ketorolac, a parenteral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, represents an alternative injectant for common shoulder, hip, and knee conditions. A review of the current literature was conducted on the efficacy of ketorolac injection in musculoskeletal diseases. Several studies support the use and efficacy of ketorolac injection in subacromial bursitis, adhesive capsulitis, and hip and knee osteoarthritis. Given the systemic effects of glucocorticoid injections, ketorolac may be a safe and effective alternative in patients with musculoskeletal disease. However, more evidence is required to better understand the effects ketorolac has on the human body during inflammatory processes.
Asunto(s)
Bursitis , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas , Osteoartritis de la Cadera , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla , Humanos , Ketorolaco/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Bursitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
As a common musculoskeletal disorder, frozen shoulder is characterized by thickened joint capsule and limited range of motion, affecting 2-5% of the general population and more than 20% of patients with diabetes mellitus. Pathologically, joint capsule fibrosis resulting from fibroblast activation is the key event. The activated fibroblasts are proliferative and contractive, producing excessive collagen. Albeit high prevalence, effective anti-fibrosis modalities, especially fibroblast-targeting therapies, are still lacking. In this study, microRNA-122 was first identified from sequencing data as a potential therapeutic agent to antagonize fibroblast activation. Then, Agomir-122, an analog of microRNA-122, was loaded into poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles (Agomir-122@NP), a carrier with excellent biocompatibility for the agent delivery. Moreover, relying on the homologous targeting effect, we coated Agomir-122@NP with the cell membrane derived from activated fibroblasts (Agomir-122@MNP), with an attempt to inhibit the proliferation, contraction, and collagen production of abnormally activated fibroblasts. After confirming the targeting effect of Agomir-122@MNP on activated fibroblasts in vitro, we proved that Agomir-122@MNP effectively curtailed fibroblasts activation, ameliorated joint capsule fibrosis, and restored range of motion in mouse models both prophylactically and therapeutically. Overall, an effective targeted delivery method was developed with promising translational value against frozen shoulder.
Asunto(s)
Bursitis , MicroARNs , Nanopartículas , Ratones , Animales , Humanos , Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Bursitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Bursitis/metabolismo , Membrana Celular , Fibrosis , Colágeno/metabolismo , MicroARNs/metabolismoRESUMEN
Frozen shoulder (FS) is a common and progressive shoulder disorder that causes glenohumeral joint stiffness, characterized by inflammation and fibrosis. The treatment options are quite limited, and the therapeutic response is hindered by the fibrous membrane formed by excessive collagen and the rapid removal by synovial fluid. To address these challenges, we designed a hyaluronic acid/Pluronic F-127 (HP)-based injectable thermosensitive hydrogel as a drug carrier loaded with dexamethasone and collagenase (HPDC). We screened for an optimal HP hydrogel that can sustain drug release for approximately 10 days both in vitro and in vivo. In the meanwhile, we found that HP hydrogel could inhibit the proliferation and diminish the adhesion capacity of rat synovial cells induced by transforming growth factor-ß1. Furthermore, using an established immobilization rat model of FS, intra-articular injection of HPDC significantly improved joint range of motion compared to medication alone. Relying on sustained drug release, the accumulated collagen fibers were degraded by collagenase to promote the deep delivery of dexamethasone. These findings showed a positive combined treatment effect of HPDC, providing a novel idea for the comprehensive treatment of FS.
Asunto(s)
Bursitis , Poloxámero , Ratas , Animales , Ácido Hialurónico , Hidrogeles , Bursitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Colágeno , Inyecciones Intraarticulares , Dexametasona/farmacología , ColagenasasAsunto(s)
Bursitis , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Humanos , Bursitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Inyecciones Intraarticulares/métodos , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Articulación del Hombro/diagnóstico por imagenAsunto(s)
Bursitis , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Humanos , Bursitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Inyecciones Intraarticulares/métodos , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Metaanálisis como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Adhesive capsulitis (AC) is a disease of the glenohumeral joint that is characterized by pain and both passive and active global stiffness with a slow and insidious onset. The disease can occur spontaneously (primary AC) or it can be secondary to other comorbidities, surgery, or trauma, such as fracture or dislocation. Multiple treatment approaches have been suggested: intra-articular steroid injection, physical therapy, manipulation under total anesthesia, and arthroscopic or open surgery. Shoulder manipulation under anesthesia is usually proposed to patients that suffer from severe AC and have already undergone several nonoperative treatments without benefit. Different techniques have been proposed. This study presents our manipulation technique and the clinical results we achieved after shoulder mobilization under brachial plexus block in patients with phase III primary AC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on a sample of 110 patients with phase III AC who were treated with this manipulation and followed up for 1 year. Patients underwent two assessments-before the procedure (T0) and 4 months after it (T1)-based on the Numerical Rating Scale, Simple Shoulder Test, and joint range of motion to assess shoulder pain, function, and joint articulation, respectively. Furthermore, the patients had to express their degree of satisfaction with the procedure and the results achieved. RESULTS: Positive and statistically significant results were recorded in terms of pain reduction (ΔNPRS = - 5.4; p < 0.01) and improved functionality (Simple Shoulder Test Δ = 5; p < 0.01). Passive range of motion was statistically significantly increased for each movement at T1. Large increases were observed in extrarotation range of motion (ROM): R1 (Δ = 77.5°) and R2 (Δ = 70°), whereas little improvements were observed in intrarotation ROM. Patients achieved satisfying functional and articular recovery in all cases. Complications that needed further treatment occurred in three cases: a brachial plexus injury, a glenoid flake fracture, and persistent pain and stiffness. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we proposed a standardized method of manipulation under brachial plexus block for patients affected by phase III adhesive capsulitis. The technique was applied among a large cohort of patients, who reported a high satisfaction rate and range-of-motion recovery after 4 months. This could represent an alternative treatment to surgery that has a shorter timeline and does not require patient hospitalization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Asunto(s)
Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial , Bursitis , Articulación del Hombro , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vigilia , Bursitis/cirugía , Bursitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Articulación del Hombro/cirugía , Dolor de Hombro/diagnóstico , Dolor de Hombro/etiología , Dolor de Hombro/terapia , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of corticosteroid (CS) injection methods for frozen shoulder. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched up to May 6, 2023. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated CS injection methods for frozen shoulder were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted independently by 2 authors. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool. DATA SYNTHESIS: A random-effects network meta-analysis was performed within a frequentist framework. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach. A total of 66 RCTs involving 4491 patients were included. For short-term outcomes, 4-site injection (vs placebo [PLA]: standardized mean difference [SMD]=-2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.81 to -1.59 in pain; SMD=2.02; 95% CI, 1.39-2.65 in global function) was the most effective (low certainty). Rotator interval injection was the optimal treatment with moderate to high certainty (vs PLA: SMD=-1.07, 95% CI, -1.51 to -0.64 in pain; SMD=0.94, 95% CI, 0.49-1.40 in global function). For midterm outcomes, 4-site injection was most effective (vs PLA: SMD=-1.71, 95% CI, -2.41 to -1.01 in pain; SMD=2.22, 95% CI, 1.34-3.09 in global function; low certainty). Distension via rotator interval (D-RI) was the optimal treatment with moderate to high certainty (vs PLA: SMD=-1.10, 95% CI, -1.69 to -0.51 in pain; SMD=1.46, 95% CI, 0.73-2.20 in global function). Distension and intra-articular injection via anterior or posterior approaches produced effects equivalent to those of rotator interval injection and D-RI. CONCLUSIONS: Rotator interval injection, distension, and intra-articular injection had equivalent effects on symptom relief. More RCTs are required to validate the superiority of multisite injections.
Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides , Bursitis , Metaanálisis en Red , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Bursitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Inyecciones Intraarticulares , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Adhesive capsulitis affects the shoulder joint, causing pain and limiting motion. In clinical practice, the effectiveness of injections varies, and the factors influencing their success remain unclear. This study investigates the predictors of effective corticosteroid injections in patients with primary adhesive capsulitis. DESIGN: This retrospective study enrolled adhesive capsulitis patients older than 35 yrs who received intra-articular corticosteroid injections. The response was determined based on patients' pain and range of motion 3 mos after the injection. Demographic data, medical comorbidities, and radiographic parameters (critical shoulder angle and acromial index) were compared between the effective and noneffective groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves and logistic regression were used to identify the predictors of injection effectiveness. RESULTS: This study included 325 patients with primary adhesive capsulitis, who were divided into responder (189 patients, 58.2%) and nonresponder (136 patients, 41.8%) groups. The receiver operating characteristic curve revealed that the acromial index score indicated favorable discrimination for predicting a poor response to injections, whereas the critical shoulder angle score did not. Logistic regression revealed that the pain period, diabetes mellitus, and acromial index are predictors of nonresponders to injections. CONCLUSIONS: Long pain duration, the presence of diabetes mellitus, and an acromial index score greater than 0.711 were predictors of nonresponse to corticosteroid injections for primary adhesive capsulitis patients.
Asunto(s)
Bursitis , Diabetes Mellitus , Articulación del Hombro , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Bursitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Bursitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Bursitis/complicaciones , Articulación del Hombro/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor/complicaciones , Inyecciones Intraarticulares/efectos adversos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Dolor de Hombro/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor de Hombro/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor de Hombro/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Pes anserine bursitis is the most common cause of periarticular knee pain. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of local injection-based therapies with different materials. DESIGN: The enrolled patients were randomly allocated to three groups to receive different interventions. Outcome measures included pain severity using the visual analog scale and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index that was evaluated before the intervention, 1 and 8 wks after that. RESULTS: This trial was performed on 72 participants, with male-to-female ratio of 0.14 and with a mean age of 61.49 ± 9.35 yrs. Corticosteroids in the first group, oxygen-ozone in the second group, and dextrose 20% in the third group, were injected into the pes anserine bursa under ultrasound guidance. Interaction between time and group showed a statistically significant improvement in visual analog scale and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index ( P ≤ 0.05) in favor of corticosteroids and oxygen-ozone groups after 1 wk and in favor of oxygen-ozone and prolotherapy groups after 8 wks. CONCLUSIONS: All three treatment options are effective for patients with pes anserine bursitis. This study showed that the effects of oxygen-ozone injection and prolotherapy last longer than those of corticosteroid injection.
Asunto(s)
Bursitis , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla , Ozono , Proloterapia , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Oxígeno , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/terapia , Bursitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Bursitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of rotator interval (RI) vs posterior approach (PA) ultrasound (US) guided corticosteroid injections into the glenohumeral (GH) joint in primary frozen shoulder (PFS). DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search for all relevant studies on Medline, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central, up to January 2023 was conducted. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials that directly compared the US-guided corticosteroid injection into the RI and GH joint using PA in patients clinically and radiographically diagnosed with PFS. DATA EXTRACTION: The primary outcome was pain, and the secondary outcomes were function, and range of motion (ROM). Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool version 2. A random-effects model and generic inverse variance method were performed. Effect sizes were estimated using mean difference (MD) and standardized mean difference (SMD). DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 5 clinical trials involving 323 subjects were included for the meta-analysis. US-guided corticosteroid injections into the RI revealed significant pain relief (MD 1.33 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20 to 2.46]; P=.02) and significant functional improvement (SMD 1.31 [95% CI 0.11 to 2.51]; P=.03) compared with the PA after 12 weeks. CONCLUSION: The results suggest the injection of corticosteroid into RI space is more effective than PA after 12 weeks in improving both pain and functional scores in patients with PFS.
Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides , Bursitis , Humanos , Inyecciones Intraarticulares , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Bursitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Bursitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Dolor de Hombro/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of combination therapy (hydrodilatation and subdeltoid bursa injection with corticosteroid, mobilization, and physical therapy [PT]) with that of PT alone for treating frozen shoulder. DESIGN: A prospective, 2-arm parallel, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Rehabilitation clinic of a private academic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n=70) with frozen shoulder (freezing stage). INTERVENTIONS: Participants (n=35) in the combination group underwent hydrodilatation and subdeltoid bursa injection with corticosteroid twice, mobilization, and usual-care PT for 8 weeks; participants (n=35) in the PT group received only the usual-care PT for 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) was the primary outcome measure. The secondary outcome measures were pain scores on a visual analog scale, range of motion (ROM), the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), quality of life (evaluated using the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey [SF-36]), and self-assessment of the treatment effect. RESULTS: Compared with the PT group, the combination group had significantly better pain (during activity), SPADI, SDQ, active and passive ROM, and self-assessment scores (all P<.001) as well as scores on some parts of the SF-36 (physical function and bodily pain, P<.05). Between-group differences were significant at the 1-, 2-, 4-, and 6-month follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of hydrodilatation (with corticosteroid), bursal corticosteroid injection, and joint mobilization with PT was superior to PT alone for treating frozen shoulder, and the effects persisted for at least 6 months.
Asunto(s)
Bursitis , Articulación del Hombro , Humanos , Hombro , Estudios Prospectivos , Método Simple Ciego , Calidad de Vida , Inyecciones Intraarticulares , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Bursitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor de Hombro , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Frozen shoulder (FS) is a common disorder characterized by spontaneous onset of shoulder pain accompanied by progressive loss of range-of-motions. The cause of FS is still unclear, and radical therapy has not been established. With the final aim of preventing or curing FS at an earlier stage, we reviewed the pathological and biological features of this disease. Many studies indicate that the main pathology of FS is inflammation initially and fibrosis later. There are inflammatory cytokines, immune cells, fibrotic growth factors, and type-III collagen in the synovium and the joint capsule. The immune cell landscape switches from the macrophages to T cells. Activated fibroblasts seem to regulate the inflammatory and fibrotic processes. The imbalance between matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteases might promote fibrosis. Additionally, advanced glycation end-products are noted in the FS synovium. Diabetes mellitus and hypothyroidism are closely related to the development of FS. In terms of nonsurgical treatment, oral or intra-articular glucocorticoids are the only drugs that provide early benefit. Some other anti-inflammatory or antifibrotic drugs may potentially control the FS, but have not been proven effective in the clinical setting. Future studies should be targeted to develop steroid-sparing agents that inhibit biological events in FS.
Asunto(s)
Bursitis , Articulación del Hombro , Humanos , Bursitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Bursitis/metabolismo , Citocinas/metabolismo , Inflamación/patología , Fibrosis , Biología , Articulación del Hombro/patologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine whether the presence of subacromial bursitis in patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy (RCT) was associated with a better outcome after ultrasound (US)-guided subacromial corticosteroid injection. METHODS: A single-center prospective study was performed including patients referred for subacromial injection to manage RCT. At baseline, all patients received an US-guided intra-bursal injection of betamethasone (1 ml). The primary endpoint was reduced pain 3 months (M3) after the procedure: a good responder was defined by a decrease in Visual Analogue Scale pain of more than 30%. Secondary endpoints included functional recovery assessed by the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and clinical success at 6 weeks (W6). We also explored the association between good clinical response and other factors, such as US or X-ray features. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included and 49 presented with subacromial bursitis. At M3, 60% of patients (54/100) were considered good responders. The rate of good responders did not differ between the bursitis and non-bursitis groups (p = 0.6). During follow-up, OSS improved over time whether bursitis was present or not. We did not find any US or X-ray features significantly associated with a favorable clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: The presence of subacromial bursitis did not influence clinical outcomes at 3 months post-subacromial injection in patients suffering from RCT. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The presence of subacromial bursitis did not influence clinical outcomes at 3 months post-subacromial corticosteroid injection in patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy. For patient management, looking for ultrasonographic signs of bursitis does not appear relevant for the indication of the injection. KEY POINTS: ⢠Ultrasound-guided subacromial corticosteroid injections led to a significant improvement in 60% of patients suffering from rotator cuff tendinopathy. ⢠The presence of subacromial bursitis was not associated with better improvement at 3 months post-injection. ⢠Except for the Minnesota score referring to job satisfaction, we did not find any baseline clinical, X-ray, or ultrasound characteristics associated with a successful outcome.
Asunto(s)
Bursitis , Tendinopatía , Humanos , Manguito de los Rotadores/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Prospectivos , Dolor de Hombro/complicaciones , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Bursitis/complicaciones , Bursitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Bursitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Tendinopatía/complicaciones , Tendinopatía/diagnóstico por imagen , Tendinopatía/tratamiento farmacológico , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Treatment for idiopathic adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder remains controversial. Stages 1 to 2 reflect an inflammatory process supporting a rationale for intra-articular glenohumeral joint corticosteroid injection to treat synovial inflammation and prevent progression to capsular fibrosis. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that an intra-articular ultrasound-guided glenohumeral injection (USGI) of corticosteroid in patients diagnosed with Stage 1 or 2 idiopathic adhesive capsulitis will result in timely functional recovery and resolution of pain and stiffness. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. METHODS: Patients with Stage 1 or 2 idiopathic adhesive capsulitis treated with an intra-articular corticosteroid injection were included. Patients were seen by a single physician and diagnosed using history and physical examination with careful attention to measurement of glenohumeral range of motion (ROM). A total of 61 patients met inclusion criteria. ROM measurements documented in the patient charts were recorded in forward flexion, abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation in neutral abduction. All ROM measurements were performed pre- and postinjection. All patients were treated with an USGI of local anesthetic and depomedrol. Recovery criteria were defined as forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation within 15° of the contralateral side and internal rotation within 3 spinous process levels of the contralateral side. RESULTS: A total of 11 patients with Stage 1 and 50 patients with Stage 2 adhesive capsulitis comprised the final study cohort. Within the Stage 1 cohort, all 11 patients met recovery criteria for forward flexion and internal rotation (100%), 10 met recovery criteria for abduction (91%), and 8 met recovery criteria for external rotation (73%). Within the Stage 2 cohort, 31 patients met recovery criteria for forward flexion (62%), 30 met recovery criteria for abduction (60%), 36 met recovery criteria for internal rotation (72%), and 25 met recovery criteria for external rotation (50%). The difference in time to recovery in days was statistically significant in all ROM planes and was within 2 to 6 weeks for patients in Stage 1 and 7 to 10 weeks for Stage 2. CONCLUSION: USGI for early adhesive capsulitis allows patients to recover ROM more rapidly if performed early after onset of pain and stiffness. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results stress the importance of recognition of idiopathic adhesive capsulitis in its early stages and subsequent intervention with an intra-articular glenohumeral corticosteroid injection.
Asunto(s)
Bursitis , Articulación del Hombro , Humanos , Hombro , Bursitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Bursitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Articulación del Hombro/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor , Inyecciones Intraarticulares , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Frozen shoulder (FS) is a common condition that can cause severe pain and limited range of motion in the shoulder joint. While intra-articular steroid injection has been shown to be an effective treatment for FS, manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is an alternative treatment that has gained popularity in recent years. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the effectiveness of MUA on FS patients with concomitant rotator cuff injury or tear. Though a few studies have shown that MUA is not associated with rotator cuff tears, and will not exacerbate the injury, more high-quality studies with bigger sample sizes are needed. Therefore, the aim of this multi-center, single-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, superiority study is to compare the efficacy of MUA versus intra-articular steroid injection in the treatment of FS patients with a diagnosis of rotator cuff injury or tear by MRI. METHODS: A parallel, single-blinded, multi-center randomized controlled trial of 320 patients will be conducted at three hospitals of China. Eligible patients with frozen shoulder and rotator cuff injury or tear diagnosed by MRI will be randomly assigned to, in equal proportions, the manipulation under anesthesia group and the intra-articular steroid injection group via a central randomization system, undergoing a corresponding operation on day one and a sequent physical exercise for 14 days. The primary outcome is the comprehensive efficacy evaluation (total effective rate) and the change of Constant-Murley Score. Outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded, and participants will be asked not to reveal their allocation to assessors. DISCUSSION: This study aims to explore the superiority of manipulation under anesthesia in reducing pain and improving shoulder function in frozen shoulder patients accompanied with rotator cuff injury. To provide a scientific basis for the dissemination and application of manipulation under anesthesia, and a better knowledge for the role of MUA in the treatment of frozen shoulder accompanied with rotator cuff injury. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chictr.org.cn ChiCTR2200067122 . Registered on 27 December 2022. ChiCTR is a primary registry of the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) network and includes all items from the WHO Trial Registration data set in Trial registration.