Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 68.708
Filtrar
1.
Lancet Public Health ; 9(5): e282-e294, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702093

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sex and gender shape health. There is a growing body of evidence focused on comprehensively and systematically examining the magnitude, persistence, and nature of differences in health between females and males. Here, we aimed to quantify differences in the leading causes of disease burden between females and males across ages and geographies. METHODS: We used the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021 to compare disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) rates for females and males for the 20 leading causes of disease burden for individuals older than 10 years at the global level and across seven world regions, between 1990 and 2021. We present absolute and relative differences in the cause-specific DALY rates between females and males. FINDINGS: Globally, females had a higher burden of morbidity-driven conditions with the largest differences in DALYs for low back pain (with 478·5 [95% uncertainty interval 346·3-632·8] more DALYs per 100 000 individuals among females than males), depressive disorders (348·3 [241·3-471·0]), and headache disorders (332·9 [48·3-731·9]), whereas males had higher DALY rates for mortality-driven conditions with the largest differences in DALYs for COVID-19 (with 1767·8 [1581·1-1943·5] more DALYs per 100 000 among males than females), road injuries (1012·2 [934·1-1092·9]), and ischaemic heart disease (1611·8 [1405·0-1856·3]). The differences between sexes became larger over age and remained consistent over time for all conditions except HIV/AIDS. The largest difference in HIV/AIDS was observed among those aged 25-49 years in sub-Saharan Africa with 1724·8 (918·8-2613·7) more DALYs per 100 000 among females than males. INTERPRETATION: The notable health differences between females and males point to an urgent need for policies to be based on sex-specific and age-specific data. It is also important to continue promoting gender-sensitive research, and ultimately, implement interventions that not only reduce the burden of disease but also achieve greater health equity. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.


Asunto(s)
Años de Vida Ajustados por Discapacidad , Carga Global de Enfermedades , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Sexuales , Adulto , Salud Global/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Adolescente , Costo de Enfermedad , Adulto Joven , Longevidad , Niño , COVID-19/epidemiología
2.
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med ; 16(1): e1-e7, 2024 Apr 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708724

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND:  Self-management is highly recommended in managing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Amid the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown, many restrictions were imposed, which might have affected the continuum of care and self-management. However, little is known about how people with T2DM experienced self-management during COVID-19 lockdown within the primary health care (PHC) facilities. AIM:  The study explored and described the self-management challenges of adults with T2DM in Ekurhuleni PHC facilities amid COVID-19 level 5 and 4 lockdowns. SETTING:  The study was conducted in three community health centres in Ekurhuleni which are rendering PHC services. METHODS:  A phenomenological, qualitative, exploratory, and descriptive design was utilised. Purposive sampling was used to select adult patients with T2DM. Data were collected telephonically between July 2022 and August 2022 using semi-structured interviews. Inductive content analysis was used to analyse data. RESULTS:  Two themes emerged from the interviews, namely, uncontrolled blood glucose levels and financial challenges. CONCLUSION:  The patients with T2DM experienced uncontrolled blood glucose levels and financial challenges during the COVID-19 lockdown. Guidelines to improve self-management programmes during restrictions are needed to promote good health during future pandemics to prevent complications and mortality. The telehealth model can be designed to monitor chronic patients at home during lockdown as a two-way communication.Contribution: More knowledge and insight into self-management and health promotion of patients with T2DM was provided by this study. Increased training needs arose for PHC nurses in managing and monitoring patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Atención Primaria de Salud , Automanejo , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Investigación Cualitativa , SARS-CoV-2 , Anciano , Cuarentena , Turquía
3.
S Afr Fam Pract (2004) ; 66(1): e1-e7, 2024 Apr 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708746

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND:  Stillbirths are a global public health challenge, predominantly affecting low- and middle-income countries. The causes of most stillbirths are preventable. OBJECTIVES:  this study reviewed perinatal clinical audit data from Kgapane Hospital over a 4-year period with a special focus on the factors associated with stillbirths. METHODS:  File audits were done for all stillbirths occurring at Kgapane Hospital and its catchment area from 2018 to 2021. The data from these audits were analysed to identify factors associated with stillbirths. RESULTS:  A total of 392 stillbirths occurred during the study period at Kgapane Hospital and its surrounding clinics, resulting in a stillborn rate of 19.06/1000 births. Of the 392 stillbirths recorded, audits were conducted on 354 of the maternal case records. The five most common causes of stillbirths identified were: hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP) (29.7%), intrauterine growth restriction without HDP (11.6%), birth asphyxia (7.1%), premature labour ( 1000 g) (6.5%) and maternal infections (5.9%) including HIV with unsuppressed VL, intrauterine infection, coronavirus disease (COVID) and syphilis. Modifiable factors that can form the basis of improvement strategies should include training, timeous referral, plus improved resources and staffing. CONCLUSION:  Understanding the causes of stillbirths can guide improvement strategies to reduce this heart-breaking complication of pregnancy.Contribution: Family physicians working in rural hospitals are also responsible for perinatal care. Understanding the factors associated with stillbirths will guide them to develop improvement strategies to reduce these preventable deaths.


Asunto(s)
Mortinato , Humanos , Mortinato/epidemiología , Femenino , Embarazo , Sudáfrica/epidemiología , Adulto , Recién Nacido , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/epidemiología , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , COVID-19/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología
5.
S Afr Fam Pract (2004) ; 66(1): e1-e9, 2024 Apr 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708752

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND:  Spontaneous abortions occur in 12.5% of pregnancies and have a significant impact on the well-being of women. Dissatisfaction with health services is well-documented, but no studies have been conducted in district health services of the Western Cape. The aim was to explore the lived experiences of women presenting with spontaneous abortions to the emergency department at Helderberg Hospital. METHODS:  A descriptive phenomenological qualitative study used criterion-based purposive sampling to identify suitable participants. Data were collected through semi-structured individual interviews. Atlas-ti (version 22) software assisted with data analysis using the framework method. RESULTS:  A total of nine participants were interviewed. There were four main themes: a supportive environment, staff attitudes and behaviour, the impact of time, and sharing of information. The comfort, cleanliness and privacy of the environment were important. COVID-19 had also impacted on this. Showing interest, demonstrating empathy and being nonjudgemental were important, as well as the waiting time for definitive treatment and the time needed to assimilate and accept the diagnosis. In addition, the ability to give relevant information, explain the diagnosis and help patients share in decision-making were key issues. CONCLUSION:  This study highlighted the need for a more person-centred approach and managers should focus on changes to organisational culture through training and clinical governance activities. Attention should be paid to the physical environment, availability of patient information materials and sequential coordination of care with primary care services.Contribution: This study identifies issues that can improve person-centredness and women's satisfaction with care for spontaneous abortion.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Espontáneo , COVID-19 , Hospitales de Distrito , Investigación Cualitativa , Humanos , Femenino , Sudáfrica , Adulto , Aborto Espontáneo/psicología , Embarazo , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , SARS-CoV-2 , Entrevistas como Asunto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Satisfacción del Paciente , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Adulto Joven
6.
Glob Health Action ; 17(1): 2345968, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717833

RESUMEN

On 7 December 2022, the State Council of China released 'Measures to Further Optimize the Implementation of the Prevention and Control of the New Coronavirus Epidemic'. The previous three-year dynamic zero epidemic prevention policy was then replaced with a full liberalization policy. On 5 May 2023, the World Health Organization declared that COVID-19 no longer constituted a 'public health emergency of international concern.' However, given the ongoing prevalence of coronavirus, emerging mutations, and the liberalization of restrictions, there are increased risks of vulnerable people contracting new variants. Low vaccination coverage among older people with compromised immune systems, puts them at further risk. The policy shift will increase pressure on already stretched health infrastructure and medical resources. This short article adds to the current debate arguing that the Chinese government should take commensurate preventive measures, including strengthening medical facilities and equipment and targeting ongoing vaccination in older people.


Paper ContextThe COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected older people.This short paper discusses the consequences of China's liberalization policy on the older population.It suggests that the Chinese government should have taken targeted measures to mitigate health risks occurring under the changed circumstances.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Política de Salud , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , China/epidemiología , Anciano , Salud Pública , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación
7.
Am J Public Health ; 114(6): 633-641, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38718333

RESUMEN

Objectives. To evaluate the effects of a comprehensive traffic safety policy-New York City's (NYC's) 2014 Vision Zero-on the health of Medicaid enrollees. Methods. We conducted difference-in-differences analyses using individual-level New York Medicaid data to measure traffic injuries and expenditures from 2009 to 2021, comparing NYC to surrounding counties without traffic reforms (n = 65 585 568 person-years). Results. After Vision Zero, injury rates among NYC Medicaid enrollees diverged from those of surrounding counties, with a net impact of 77.5 fewer injuries per 100 000 person-years annually (95% confidence interval = -97.4, -57.6). We observed marked reductions in severe injuries (brain injury, hospitalizations) and savings of $90.8 million in Medicaid expenditures over the first 5 years. Effects were largest among Black residents. Impacts were reversed during the COVID-19 period. Conclusions. Vision Zero resulted in substantial protection for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations known to face heightened risk of injury, but the policy's effectiveness decreased during the pandemic period. Public Health Implications. Many cities have recently launched Vision Zero policies and others plan to do so. This research adds to the evidence on how and in what circumstances comprehensive traffic policies protect public health. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(6):633-641. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307617).


Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Tránsito , Medicaid , Pobreza , Heridas y Lesiones , Humanos , Accidentes de Tránsito/estadística & datos numéricos , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/prevención & control , Pobreza/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Seguridad , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control
11.
Am J Public Health ; 114(6): 599-609, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38718338

RESUMEN

Objectives. To assess heterogeneity in pandemic-period excess fatal overdoses in the United States, by location (state, county) and substance type. Methods. We used seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) models to estimate counterfactual death counts in the scenario that no pandemic had occurred. Such estimates were subtracted from actual death counts to assess the magnitude of pandemic-period excess mortality between March 2020 and August 2021. Results. Nationwide, we estimated 25 668 (95% prediction interval [PI] = 2811, 48 524) excess overdose deaths. Specifically, 17 of 47 states and 197 of 592 counties analyzed had statistically significant excess overdose-related mortality. West Virginia, Louisiana, Tennessee, Kentucky, and New Mexico had the highest rates (20-37 per 100 000). Nationally, there were 5.7 (95% PI = 1.0, 10.4), 3.1 (95% PI = 2.1, 4.2), and 1.4 (95% PI = 0.5, 2.4) excess deaths per 100 000 involving synthetic opioids, psychostimulants, and alcohol, respectively. Conclusions. The steep increase in overdose-related mortality affected primarily the southern and western United States. We identified synthetic opioids and psychostimulants as the main contributors. Public Health Implications. Characterizing overdose-related excess mortality across locations and substance types is critical for optimal allocation of public health resources. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(6):599-609. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307618).


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Sobredosis de Droga , Humanos , Sobredosis de Droga/mortalidad , Sobredosis de Droga/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/mortalidad , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología
12.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 3891, 2024 May 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38719858

RESUMEN

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, along with the implementation of public health and social measures (PHSMs), have markedly reshaped infectious disease transmission dynamics. We analysed the impact of PHSMs on 24 notifiable infectious diseases (NIDs) in the Chinese mainland, using time series models to forecast transmission trends without PHSMs or pandemic. Our findings revealed distinct seasonal patterns in NID incidence, with respiratory diseases showing the greatest response to PHSMs, while bloodborne and sexually transmitted diseases responded more moderately. 8 NIDs were identified as susceptible to PHSMs, including hand, foot, and mouth disease, dengue fever, rubella, scarlet fever, pertussis, mumps, malaria, and Japanese encephalitis. The termination of PHSMs did not cause NIDs resurgence immediately, except for pertussis, which experienced its highest peak in December 2023 since January 2008. Our findings highlight the varied impact of PHSMs on different NIDs and the importance of sustainable, long-term strategies, like vaccine development.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades Transmisibles , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/transmisión , COVID-19/prevención & control , China/epidemiología , Enfermedades Transmisibles/epidemiología , Pandemias/prevención & control , Incidencia , Estaciones del Año , Salud Pública , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos
13.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10534, 2024 05 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720009

RESUMEN

Health care workers have been exposed to COVID-19 more than people in other professions, which may have led to stigmatization, discrimination, and violence toward them, possibly impacting their mental health. We investigated (1) factors associated with stigma, discrimination, and violence, (2) the association of stigma, discrimination, and violence with mental health, (3) everyday experiences of stigmatization, discrimination, and violence. We chose a combination of a quantitative approach and qualitative content analysis to analyze data collected at three time points: in 2020, 2021 and 2022. A higher age was associated with lower odds of experiencing stigma, discrimination, and violence, whereas female gender was related to more negative experiences. The intensity of exposure to COVID-19 was associated with greater experience with stigmatization, discrimination, and violence across all three years (for example in 2022: odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 1.74, 1.18-2.55 for mild exposure; 2.82, 1.95-4.09 for moderate exposure; and 5.74, 3.55-9.26 for severe exposure, when compared to no exposure). Stigma, discrimination, and violence were most strongly associated with psychological distress in 2020 (odds ratio = 2.97, 95% confidence interval 2.27-3.88) and with depressive symptoms in 2021 (odds ratio = 2.78, 95% confidence interval 2.12-3.64). Attention should be given to the destigmatization of contagious diseases and the prevention of discrimination, violence, and mental health problems, both within workplaces and among the public.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Personal de Salud , Salud Mental , Pandemias , Estigma Social , Humanos , COVID-19/psicología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Personal de Salud/psicología , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2 , Violencia/psicología , Discriminación Social/psicología
14.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1268, 2024 May 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720254

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In Africa, approx. 675 million people were at risk of food insecurity. COVID-19 pandemic is likely to have exacerbated this situation, by damaging populations' access to and affordability of foods. This study is aimed at estimating the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on availability and prices of essential food commodities at 20 large markets in Ghana. METHODS: Data on food availability and food retail prices collected through weekly market-level data during the period from July 2017 to September 2020 were used in this study. We performed interrupted time-series analyses and estimated the percentage increases between the observed and predicted food prices by food group and by region to assess the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on food prices. RESULTS: As a result, the impact of COVID-19 on food availability was limited. However, the results of interrupted time-series analyses indicate a significant increase in overall mean food prices in Greater Accra, Eastern and Upper East regions. It was also found that mean price of starchy roots, tubers and plantains significantly increased across regions. DISCUSSION: The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on food availability and prices was significant but varied by food type and regions in Ghana. Continuous monitoring and responses are critical to maintain food availability and affordability.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Comercio , Abastecimiento de Alimentos , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Ghana/epidemiología , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Abastecimiento de Alimentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Abastecimiento de Alimentos/economía , Comercio/estadística & datos numéricos , Comercio/economía , Inseguridad Alimentaria/economía , Pandemias/economía
15.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1259, 2024 May 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720278

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Worldwide, it has been reported that fully vaccinated people still die of COVID-19-associated symptoms, generating public uncertainty about the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines. Hence, this research is aimed at assessing the incidence of COVID-19 breakthrough infection among vaccinated Health Workers and the possible effect of changes in the practice of post-vaccination safety precautions. METHOD: This was a Health facility-based descriptive cross-sectional study. Data were collected using self-administered questionnaires distributed at the participant's work unit across the selected health facilities. The nasopharyngeal specimen was also obtained from the participants and analysed using STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag Test rapid chromatographic immunoassay for the detection of antigens to SARS-CoV-2. All data were input and analyzed using SPSS version 20. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant relationship between the vaccination status of respondents and the post-vaccination test result (χ2 = 6.816, df = 1, p = 0.009). The incidence of COVID-19 infection among the vaccinated and unvaccinated HCWs was 2% and 8% respectively. 5 of the 15 respondents who tested positive for COVID-19 had been fully vaccinated. However, all 5 of them did not practice safety measures after vaccination. None of the respondents who practised safety measures after vaccination tested positive for COVID-19. The remaining 10 respondents that tested positive for COVID-19 had not been vaccinated though they practised safety precautions. CONCLUSION: Vaccination and the practice of safety precautions will go a long way to preventing future COVID-19 breakthrough infections.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Nigeria , Estudios Transversales , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Incidencia , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Infección Irruptiva
16.
Int J Equity Health ; 23(1): 93, 2024 May 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720282

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Health disparities, starkly exposed and exacerbated by coronavirus disease 2019, pose a significant challenge to healthcare system access and health outcomes. Integrating health inequalities into health technology assessment calls for robust analytical methodologies utilizing disaggregated data to investigate and quantify the scope of these disparities. However, a comprehensive summary of population datasets that can be used for this purpose is lacking. The objective of this review was to identify publicly accessible health inequalities data repositories that are potential resources for healthcare decision-making and future health technology assessment submissions. METHODS: An environmental scan was conducted in June of 2023 of six international organizations (World Health Organization, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Eurostat, United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation, the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, and World Bank) and 38 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. The official websites of 42 jurisdictions, excluding non-English websites and those lacking English translations, were reviewed. Screening and data extraction were performed by two reviewers for each data repository, including health indicators, determinants of health, and health inequality metrics. The results were narratively synthesized. RESULTS: The search identified only a limited number of country-level health inequalities data repositories. The World Health Organization Health Inequality Data Repository emerged as the most comprehensive source of health inequality data. Some country-level data repositories, such as Canada's Health Inequality Data Tool and England's Health Inequality Dashboard, offered rich local insights into determinants of health and numerous health status indicators, including mortality. Data repositories predominantly focused on determinants of health such as age, sex, social deprivation, and geography. CONCLUSION: Interactive interfaces featuring data exploration and visualization options across diverse patient populations can serve as valuable tools to address health disparities. The data they provide may help inform complex analytical methodologies that integrate health inequality considerations into healthcare decision-making. This may include assessing the feasibility of transporting health inequality data across borders.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , SARS-CoV-2 , Toma de Decisiones , Salud Global , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud
17.
Harm Reduct J ; 21(1): 91, 2024 May 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720307

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Substance use disorder treatment and recovery support services are critical for achieving and maintaining recovery. There are limited data on how structural and social changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic impacted individual-level experiences with substance use disorder treatment-related services among community-based samples of people who inject drugs. METHODS: People with a recent history of injection drug use who were enrolled in the community-based AIDS Linked to the IntraVenous Experience study in Baltimore, Maryland participated in a one-time, semi-structured interview between July 2021 and February 2022 about their experiences living through the COVID-19 pandemic (n = 28). An iterative inductive coding process was used to identify themes describing how structural and social changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic affected participants' experiences with substance use disorder treatment-related services. RESULTS: The median age of participants was 54 years (range = 24-73); 10 (36%) participants were female, 16 (57%) were non-Hispanic Black, and 8 (29%) were living with HIV. We identified several structural and social changes due the pandemic that acted as barriers and facilitators to individual-level engagement in treatment with medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and recovery support services (e.g., support group meetings). New take-home methadone flexibility policies temporarily facilitated engagement in MOUD treatment, but other pre-existing rigid policies and practices (e.g., zero-tolerance) were counteracting barriers. Changes in the illicit drug market were both a facilitator and barrier to MOUD treatment. Decreased availability and pandemic-related adaptations to in-person services were a barrier to recovery support services. While telehealth expansion facilitated engagement in recovery support group meetings for some participants, other participants faced digital and technological barriers. These changes in service provision also led to diminished perceived quality of both virtual and in-person recovery support group meetings. However, a facilitator of recovery support was increased accessibility of individual service providers (e.g., counselors and Sponsors). CONCLUSIONS: Structural and social changes across several socioecological levels created new barriers and facilitators of individual-level engagement in substance use disorder treatment-related services. Multilevel interventions are needed to improve access to and engagement in high-quality substance use disorder treatment and recovery support services among people who inject drugs.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Femenino , Baltimore , Adulto , Masculino , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/rehabilitación , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Anciano , Investigación Cualitativa , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemias , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/rehabilitación , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud
18.
Syst Rev ; 13(1): 126, 2024 May 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720337

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The unprecedented volume and speed at which COVID-19-related systematic reviews (SRs) may have been produced has raised questions regarding the quality of this evidence. It is feasible that pandemic-related factors may have led to an impairment in quality (reduced internal validity, increased risk of bias [RoB]). This may have serious implications for decision-making related to public health and individual healthcare. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to compare the quality of SRs published during the pandemic that were related to COVID-19 with SRs published during the pandemic that were unrelated to COVID-19 (all of which were fully appraised in the KSR Evidence database of SRs in healthcare). Our secondary objective was to compare the quality of SRs published during the pandemic (regardless of research topic), with SRs published pre-pandemic. METHODS: We compared all SRs related to COVID-19 to all SRs unrelated to COVID-19 that (i) were published during the pandemic (between 1st March 2020 and September 14, 2022), (ii) were included in KSR Evidence, and (iii) had been appraised using the ROBIS tool. We then compared all SRs published during the pandemic (regardless of research topic) with a pre-pandemic sample of SRs. RESULTS: For SRs published during the pandemic, we found there was no statistically significant difference in quality between those SRs tagged as being related to COVID-19 and those that were not [relative risk (RR) of low RoB for COVID-19 versus COVID-19-unrelated reviews: 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66 to 1.34]. Generally, COVID-19 SRs and COVID-19-unrelated SRs were both of low quality with only 10% of COVID-19 reviews and 11% of COVID-19-unrelated reviews rated as low RoB. However, SRs (regardless of topic) published during the pandemic were of lower quality than those published pre-pandemic (RR for low RoB for 'during pandemic' versus 'pre-pandemic': 0.30; 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.34) with 11% of pandemic and 36% of pre-pandemic SRs rated as low RoB. CONCLUSION: These results suggest COVID-19 and COVID-19-unrelated SRs published during the pandemic are equally of low quality. SRs published during the pandemic were generally lower quality compared with SRs published pre-pandemic irrespective of COVID-19 focus. Moreover, SR quality in general is seriously lacking, and considerable efforts need to be made to substantially improve the quality and rigour of the SR process.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , COVID-19/epidemiología , Humanos , Pandemias
19.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 74(3): 242-250, 2024 May 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722211

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mental ill health has a high economic impact on society and employers. National and international policy advocates line manager (LM) training in mental health as a key intervention, but little is known about employer training provisions. AIMS: To explore the prevalence and characteristics of organizations that offer LM training in mental health. METHODS: Secondary analysis of existing longitudinal anonymised organizational-level survey data derived from computer-assisted telephone interview surveys collected in four waves (2020:1900 firms, 2021:1551, 2022:1904, 2023:1902) in England, before, during and after a global pandemic. RESULTS: The proportion of organizations offering LM training in mental health increased pre- to post-pandemic (2020:50%, 2023:59%) but 41% do not currently provide it. Logistic regression confirmed that LM training is more likely to be offered by large-sized enterprises, organizations with a larger proportion of employees who are younger (aged 25-49), female, disabled and from ethnic minority communities. Sector patterns were inconsistent, but in 2023, organizations from the 'Hospitality' and 'Business Services' sectors were more likely to provide LM training than other sectors. CONCLUSIONS: Continued efforts are needed to increase the proportion of employers offering LM training in mental health, particularly small- to medium-sized enterprises, and organizations with predominantly male, White and/or older workforces.


Asunto(s)
Salud Mental , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inglaterra , COVID-19/epidemiología , Salud Laboral , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
20.
J Health Popul Nutr ; 43(1): 58, 2024 May 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38725055

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected human social contact patterns, but there is limited understanding regarding the post-pandemic social contact patterns. Our objective is to quantitatively assess social contact patterns in Suzhou post-COVID-19. METHODS: We employed a diary design and conducted social contact surveys from June to October 2023, utilizing paper questionnaires. A generalized linear model was utilized to analyze the relationship between individual contacts and covariates. We examined the proportions of contact type, location, duration, and frequency. Additionally, age-related mixed matrices were established. RESULTS: The participants reported an average of 11.51 (SD 5.96) contact numbers and a total of 19.78 (SD 20.94) contact numbers per day, respectively. The number of contacts was significantly associated with age, household size, and the type of week. Compared to the 0-9 age group, those in the 10-19 age group reported a higher number of contacts (IRR = 1.12, CI: 1.01-1.24), while participants aged 20 and older reported fewer (IRR range: 0.54-0.67). Larger households (5 or more) reported more contacts (IRR = 1.09, CI: 1.01-1.18) and fewer contacts were reported on weekends (IRR = 0.95, CI: 0.90-0.99). School had the highest proportion of contact durations exceeding 4 h (49.5%) and daily frequencies (90.4%), followed by home and workplace. The contact patterns exhibited clear age-assortative mixing, with Q indices of 0.27 and 0.28. CONCLUSIONS: We assessed the characteristics of social contact patterns in Suzhou, which are essential for parameterizing models of infectious disease transmission. The high frequency and intensity of contacts among school-aged children should be given special attention, making school intervention policies a crucial component in controlling infectious disease transmission.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/transmisión , COVID-19/epidemiología , China/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Adolescente , Niño , Adulto Joven , Preescolar , Persona de Mediana Edad , Lactante , Trazado de Contacto/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , SARS-CoV-2 , Recién Nacido , Composición Familiar , Pandemias , Anciano , Enfermedades Transmisibles/transmisión , Enfermedades Transmisibles/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA