[The frequency of cachexia and its associated factors in elderly diabetic patients with chronic diseases: A study using the diagnostic criteria of the Asian Working Group for Cachexia].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency of cachexia and its associated factors using the Asian Working Group for Cachexia (AWGC) criteria in elderly patients with diabetes and chronic diseases. METHODS: The subjects were diabetic outpatients of ≥65 years of age who were managed at Ise Red Cross Hospital. Patients with chronic disease (chronic heart failure, cancer, or chronic renal failure). Cachexia was evaluated based on the AWGC criteria and was defined as a body mass index (BMI) <21 kg/m2 and one or more of the following: anorexia, elevated C-reactive protein, and decreased grip strength. A logistic regression analysis was used to identify cachexia-related factors, with cachexia as the dependent variable, and various variables (basic attributes, blood glucose-related parameters, diabetic complications, comorbidities, and treatment) as explanatory variables. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-two patients (male, n=164; female, n=78) were included in the study. Forty patients (16.5%) had cachexia. A logistic analysis revealed that age (odds ratio (OR), 1.16; P<0.001), type 1 diabetes (OR, 15.25; P=0.002), diabetic retinopathy (OR, 5.72; P=0.001), and physical frailty (OR, 7.06; P<0.001) were associated with cachexia. CONCLUSION: Elderly diabetics with chronic diseases were more likely to have cachexia. According to the AWGC criteria, the frequency of cachexia was 16.5% in elderly patients with diabetes and chronic diseases. Additionally, type 1 diabetes, diabetic retinopathy, age, and physical frailty were identified as factors associated with cachexia. In elderly diabetes patients with chronic diseases, it is therefore important to raise awareness regarding cachexia when these related factors are diagnosed.

Machine learning to identify precachexia and cachexia: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Detection of precachexia is important for the prevention and treatment of cachexia. However, how to identify precachexia is still a challenge. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to detect cancer precachexia using a simple method and distinguish the different characteristics of precachexia and cachexia. METHODS: We included 3896 participants in this study. We used all baseline characteristics as input variables and trained machine learning (ML) models to calculate the importance of the variables. After filtering the variables based on their importance, the models were retrained. The best model was selected based on the receiver operating characteristic value. Subsequently, we used the same method and process to identify patients with precachexia in a noncachexia population using the same method and process. RESULTS: Participants in this study included 2228 men (57.2%) and 1668 women (42.8%), of whom 471 were diagnosed with precachexia, 1178 with cachexia, and the remainder with noncachexia. The most important characteristics of cachexia were eating changes, arm circumference, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) level, and C-reactive protein albumin ratio (CAR). The most important features distinguishing precachexia were eating changes, serum creatinine, HDL, handgrip strength, and CAR. The two logistic regression models for screening for cachexia and diagnosing precachexia had the highest area under the curve values of 0.830 and 0.701, respectively. Calibration and decision curves showed that the models had good accuracy. CONCLUSION: We developed two models for identifying precachexia and cachexia, which will help clinicians detect and diagnose precachexia.

Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition cachexia: an inflammation-first approach for the diagnosis of disease-related malnutrition.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The following article examines the rationale for an inflammation-first approach for diagnosing cachexia and how the current Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) framework may be adapted to facilitate this. RECENT FINDINGS: Recently, the GLIM have published guidance on the measurement of inflammation in the context of cachexia, advocating that C-reactive protein (CRP) should be utilized for quantification. The inclusion of a systemic inflammatory biomarker for the diagnosis of cachexia questions whether it may be more aptly considered a systemic inflammatory syndrome. SUMMARY: The current consensus of the GLIM is that cachexia is 'disease-related malnutrition with inflammation'. In line with this definition, the GLIM proposed a two-step diagnostic framework: screening for malnutrition using validated screening tools and then confirming the presence of disease-related malnutrition with phenotypic (nonvolitional weight loss, low BMI, and reduced muscle mass) and aetiologic criterion reduced food intake/assimilation, and inflammation or disease burden). The GLIM are to be commended for guidance on the measurement of systemic inflammation in their current proposal, given the relative importance to clinical outcomes in patients with cancer. However, the use of CRP is somewhat rudimentary and contrasts other cancer cachexia guidelines and contemporary clinical cancer research.

Assessing cachexia in obesity: contradiction or perfectly possible?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Existing definitions of clinically important weight loss in patients with cancer do not specifically address weight loss in patients who are obese at presentation. This review explores the clinical impact of weight loss and depletion of the skeletal muscle mass (i.e., criteria defining cancer cachexia), in patients with obesity. RECENT FINDINGS: Overweight and obese BMI values are shown by many recent studies to pose a survival advantage in patients with cancers of advanced stage, when compared with BMI in normal and underweight ranges. The classification of cancer-associated weight loss has evolved, and current grading schemes evaluate the impact of weight across the range of BMI values. Weight loss is associated with mortality in patients with BMI more than 30 kg/m 2 , however this is to a much lesser degree than in patients with lower BMI values. Diagnostic imaging permits the precise assessment of skeletal muscle index (SMI) in patients with cancer, and it has been clearly shown that while usually quite muscular, obese patients can have profound muscle depletion (i.e., sarcopenia), independent of the presence of weight loss. Muscle depletion associates strongly with mortality in obese patients, as well as with complications of cancer surgery and systemic therapy. SUMMARY: It would seem contradictory to diagnose concurrent obesity and cachexia, as these terms represent opposite ends of the weight spectrum. Weight loss can occur in anyone with cancer, however its priority for clinical management may be lesser in obese versus low body weight individuals. Sarcopenic obesity is strongly associated with a poor clinical outcome and deserves further research, diagnosis in clinical practice, and new strategies for mitigation.

Prevalence and relevance of cachexia as diagnosed by two different definitions in patients undergoing hemodialysis: A retrospective and exploratory study.

OBJECTIVE: Cachexia is present in various chronic diseases and is associated with decreased quality of life and increased risk of morbidity and mortality. However, evidence regarding the association of cachexia with prognosis in patients undergoing hemodialysis is limited. We assessed cachexia using two definitions and compared prevalence, functional impairment, and prognostic impact in patients undergoing hemodialysis. METHODS: We enrolled outpatients undergoing hemodialysis at two centers retrospectively. We assessed cachexia using the conventional cachexia (Evans' criteria) and the Asian Working Group for Cachexia (AWGC) criteria. The study examined all-cause mortality and functional status (Clinical Frailty Scale and short physical performance battery). We used Cox proportional hazards model to examine the association with prognosis, and logistic regression analysis to examine the association with functional impairment. RESULTS: Among 367 patients (mean age, 67 years; 63 % male), cachexia prevalence, as defined by Evans' criteria and AWGC, was 21.3 % and 35.2 %, respectively. Cachexia as defined by Evans' criteria was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.81, 1.02-3.23). Also, cachexia as defined by AWGC criteria showed suggestive association with increasing mortality (HR, 95 % CI: 1.56, 0.90-2.70). Similar results were seen between cachexia and functional impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients on hemodialysis, cachexia was highly prevalent and was associated with poor prognosis and functional impairment. Detecting cachexia in earlier stages may be useful for risk stratification in this population.

Characteristics and prognostic impact of cancer cachexia defined by the Asian Working Group for Cachexia consensus in patients with curable gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cachexia is prevalent in cancer patients. The conventional diagnostic criteria for cachexia are often based on Western evidence, lacking consensus for Asian populations. This study aims to compare Asian Working Group for Cachexia (AWGC) criteria with Fearon's criteria, assessing their differences in population characteristics and prognostic impact. METHODS: The clinical data of patients who underwent radical gastrectomy between 2013 and 2019 were prospectively collected. Cachexia diagnosis involves the utilization of either AWGC criteria and the previous international consensus proposed by Fearon et al. A scoring model is established based on the optional criteria according to the AWGC criteria. Univariate and multivariate logistic and Cox regression analysis were conducted to determine the independent effect factors for postoperative complications and overall survival. RESULTS: In a total of 1330 patients, 461 met AWGC cachexia criteria and 311 met Fearon's criteria. Excluding 262 overlapping cases, those diagnosed solely with AWGC-cachexia had higher age and lower BMI, albumin, hemoglobin, and handgrip strength compared to those by Fearon's criteria alone. AWGC-cachexia independently increased the risk of postoperative complications, whereas Fearon's criteria did not. Patients with AWGC-cachexia also exhibited shorter overall survival than Fearon's criteria. The AWGC-based cachexia grading system effectively stratifies the risks of postoperative complications and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The AWGC criteria is more effective in diagnosing cancer cachexia in the Asian population and provide better prognostic indicators.

Biomarker endpoints in cancer cachexia clinical trials: Systematic Review 5 of the cachexia endpoint series.

Regulatory agencies require evidence that endpoints correlate with clinical benefit before they can be used to approve drugs. Biomarkers are often considered surrogate endpoints. In cancer cachexia trials, the measurement of biomarkers features frequently. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the frequency and diversity of biomarker endpoints in cancer cachexia trials. A comprehensive electronic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane (1990-2023) was completed. Eligible trials met the following criteria: adults (≥18 years), prospective design, more than 40 participants, use of a cachexia intervention for more than 14 days and use of a biomarker(s) as an endpoint. Biomarkers were defined as any objective measure that was assayed from a body fluid, including scoring systems based on these assays. Routine haematology and biochemistry to monitor intervention toxicity were not considered. Data extraction was performed using Covidence, and reporting followed PRISMA guidance (PROSPERO: CRD42022276710). A total of 5975 studies were assessed, of which 52 trials (total participants = 6522) included biomarkers as endpoints. Most studies (n = 29, 55.7%) included a variety of cancer types. Pharmacological interventions (n = 27, 51.9%) were most evaluated, followed by nutritional interventions (n = 20, 38.4%). Ninety-nine different biomarkers were used across the trials, and of these, 96 were assayed from blood. Albumin (n = 29, 55.8%) was assessed most often, followed by C-reactive protein (n = 22, 42.3%), interleukin-6 (n = 16, 30.8%) and tumour necrosis factor-α (n = 14, 26.9%), the latter being the only biomarker that was used to guide sample size calculations. Biomarkers were explicitly listed as a primary outcome in six trials. In total, 12 biomarkers (12.1% of 99) were used in six trials or more. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels both increased significantly in all three trials in which they were both used. This corresponded with a primary outcome, lean body mass, and was related to the pharmacological mechanism. Biomarkers were predominately used as exploratory rather than primary endpoints. The most commonly used biomarker, albumin, was limited by its lack of responsiveness to nutritional intervention. For a biomarker to be responsive to change, it must be related to the mechanism of action of the intervention and/or the underlying cachexia process that is modified by the intervention, as seen with IGFBP-3, IGF-1 and anamorelin. To reach regulatory approval as an endpoint, the relationship between the biomarker and clinical benefit must be clarified.

Influence of cachexia on immunotherapy efficacy and prognosis for malignant tumors of the digestive system.

BACKGROUND: The presence of cancer cachexia is a significant adverse prognostic indicator in patients with malignant tumors. Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome characterized by a constant loss of skeletal muscles with or without a loss of weight, leading to immune dysfunction. We performed a retrospective study to investigate the influence of cachexia on the immunotherapy efficacy and prognosis for malignant tumors of the digestive system. METHODS: The present study adopts a cross-sectional design. The prognosis data of patients with advanced cancer of the digestive system who received immunotherapy from September 2021 to December 2022 were analyzed. Cachexia was calculated using the change of the area of the psoas major muscle (PMMA) or the weight. We measured the change at the beginning of immunotherapy and at least 2 cycles afterward. The participants were categorized into the cachexia group and control group based on the evaluation criteria. Kaplan-Meier and Log-rank methods were used for survival analysis. Cox proportional hazard model as a method to assess the contribution of different clinical factors to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: A total number of 98 patients, including esophageal carcinoma (4, 4%), gastric (36, 37%), colorectal (51, 52%), and other cancer types (7, 7%), were enrolled. Fifty-four patients were diagnosed with non-cancer cachexia, and the cancer cachexia group included 44 patients. The median PFS in the cachexia group was shorter than that in the control group (130 days vs. 212 days). Their difference was not significant (p = .321). The survival rate of the patients without cachexia was longer than of those with cachexia (p = .027). The level of albumin and the number of metastatic organs were related to PFS (p = .020, p = .029). The albumin level was significantly associated with the OS of patients (p = .003). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of cachexia was significantly associated with poor OS in patients with malignant tumors of the digestive system who received immunotherapy, not with PFS or the response to immunotherapy.

The relationship between LDH and GLIM criteria for cancer cachexia: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer cachexia is a clinical condition characterized by recognizable "sickness behaviors" accompanied by loss of lean body tissue. The Global Leadership on Malnutrition (GLIM) has proposed phenotypic (unintentional weight loss, low body mass index and low muscle mass) and aetiologic (reduced food intake and inflammation or disease burden) diagnostic criteria. Recent work has suggested serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) might represent a 3rd aetiologic criteria. Little is known of its relationship with GLIM. A systematic review and meta-analysis of their comparative prognostic value and association was performed. METHODS: A search of electronic databases (PubMed, Medline, Ovid, Cochrane) up to February 2023 was used to identify studies that compared the prognostic value of LDH and components of the GLIM criteria in cancer. An analysis of the relationship between LDH and the components of GLIM was undertaken where this data was available. RevMan 5.4.1 was used to perform a meta-analysis for each diagnostic criteria that had 3 or more studies which reported hazard ratios with a 95 per cent confidence interval for overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 119 studies were reviewed. Advanced lung cancer was the most studied population. Included in the meta-analysis were 6 studies (n=2165) on LDH and weight loss, 17 studies (n=7540) on LDH and low BMI, 5 studies (n=758) on LDH and low muscle mass, 0 studies on LDH and food intake and 93 studies (n=32,190) on LDH and inflammation. There was a significant association between elevated serum LDH and each of low BMI (OR 1.39, 1.09 - 1.77; p=0.008), elevated NLR (OR 2.04, 1.57 - 2.65; p<0.00001) and elevated CRP (OR 2.58, 1.81 - 3.67; p<0.00001). There was no association between elevated serum LDH and low muscle mass. Only one study presented data on the association between LDH and unintentional weight loss. Elevated LDH showed a comparative OS (HR 1.86, 1.57 - 2.07; p<0.00001) to unintentional weight loss (HR 1.57, 1.23 - 1.99; p=0.0002) and had a similar OS (HR 2.00, 1.70 - 2.34; p<0.00001) to low BMI (HR 1.57, 1.29-2.90; p<0.0001). LDH also showed an OS (HR 2.25, 1.76 - 2.87; p<0.00001) congruous with low muscle mass (HR 1.93, 1.14 - 3.27; p=0.01) and again, LDH conferred as poor an OS (HR 1.77, 1.64-1.90; p<0.00001) as elevated NLR (HR 1.61, 1.48 - 1.77; p<0.00001) or CRP (HR 1.55, 1.43 - 1.69; p<0.00001). CONCLUSION: Current literature suggests elevated serum LDH is associated with inflammation in cancer (an aetiologic GLIM criterion), however more work is required to establish the relationship between LDH and the phenotypic components of GLIM. Additionally, elevated serum LDH appears to be a comparative prognosticator of overall survival in cancer when compared to the GLIM criteria.

Relationship between cachexia and short physical performance battery scores in patients with heart failure attending comprehensive outpatient cardiac rehabilitation.

Heart failure (HF) can cause metabolic imbalances, leading to anabolic resistance and increased energy expenditure, which often results in weight loss and cachexia. Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation (CR), including exercise, nutritional support, and risk management, is crucial for enhancing the health and quality of life of patients with HF and is expected to play a central role in the prevention and treatment of HF-associated cachexia. However, the prevalence of cachexia in patients with HF undergoing comprehensive outpatient CR is currently unknown, and the detailed characteristics including of motor function of such patients remain undefined. Therefore, this cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of cachexia and the relationship between cachexia and lower limb motor function in patients with HF undergoing outpatient CR. This study included 115 consecutive patients with HF (43% male; mean age, 78 ± 8 years) who underwent comprehensive outpatient CR. The cachexia status was assessed according to the definition proposed by the Asian Working Group on Cachexia in 2023. The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Form (MNA-SF) were used to evaluate motor function of the lower limbs and nutritional status, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to examine the potential relationship between cachexia and low SPPB scores (≤ 9 points). The prevalence of cachexia was 30% in this study. Compared with those without cachexia, patients with cachexia were significantly older and showed notable reductions in body mass index, MNA-SF scores, handgrip strength, gait speed, and SPPB scores. A multivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusted for confounders, revealed that both age (odds ratio [OR], 1.129; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.034-1.248; P = 0.016) and presence of cachexia (OR, 3.783; 95% CI, 1.213-11.796; P = 0.022) were independently associated with low SPPB scores. These findings highlight the importance of focusing on cachexia in patients with HF as part of a comprehensive outpatient CR and may be crucial in developing treatments to improve lower limb motor function in patients with HF who develops cachexia.

Metabolomic profiling of cancer-related fatigue involved in cachexia and chemotherapy.

Patients with advanced cancer are frequently burdened with a severe sensation of fatigue called cancer-related fatigue (CRF). CRF is induced at various stages and treatments, such as cachexia and chemotherapy, and reduces the overall survival of patients. Objective and quantitative assessment of CRF could contribute to the diagnosis and prediction of treatment efficacy. However, such studies have not been intensively performed, particularly regarding metabolic profiles. Here, we conducted plasma metabolomics of 15 patients with urological cancer. The patients with and without fatigue, including those with cachexia or chemotherapy-induced fatigue, were compared. Significantly lower concentrations of valine and tryptophan were observed in fatigued patients than in non-fatigued patients. In addition, significantly higher concentrations of polyamine pathway metabolites were observed in patients with fatigue and cachexia than in those without cachexia. Patients with exacerbated fatigue due to chemotherapy showed significantly decreased cysteine and methionine metabolism before chemotherapy compared with those without fatigue exacerbation. These findings suggest that plasma metabolic profiles could help improve the diagnosis and monitoring of CRF.

Cachexia Index in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: The cachexia index is a novel biomarker of cancer cachexia. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of cachexia index on prognosis after surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. METHODS: In August 2023, we systematically searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Ovid for relevant studies on the oncological outcome after gastrointestinal cancer surgery and analyzed the findings from these studies for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Our systematic and meta-analysis review identified eight studies involving 1876 patients. The number of patients with low cachexia index accounted for 813 patients (43.3%). We found that low cachexia index was associated with worse overall survival (pooled HR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.85-2.87; z = 7.49; P < 0.001) and disease/relapse/progression-free survival (pooled HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.45-2.18; z = 5.50; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis showed that cachexia index was associated with oncological outcome after gastrointestinal cancer surgery. However, the limitations of this meta-analysis should be taken into consideration when interpreting the results.

Bridging gaps in cancer cachexia Care: Current insights and future perspectives.

Cachexia is characterized by severe weight loss and skeletal muscle depletion, and is a threat to cancer patients by worsening their prognosis. International guidelines set indications for the screening and diagnosis of cancer cachexia and suggest interventions (nutritional support, physical exercise, and pharmacological treatments). Nevertheless, real-life experience not always aligns with such indications. We aimed to review the current state of the field and the main advancements, with a focus on real-life clinical practice from the perspectives of oncologists, nutrition professionals, and radiologists. Pragmatic solutions are proposed to improve the current management of the disease, emphasizing the importance of increasing awareness of clinical nutrition's benefits, fostering multidisciplinary collaboration, promoting early identification of at-risk patients, and leveraging available resources. Given the distinct needs of patients who are receiving oncologic anti-cancer treatments and those in the follow-up phase, the use of tailored approaches is encouraged. The pivotal role of healthcare professionals in managing patients in active treatment is highlighted, while patient and caregiver empowerment should be strengthened in the follow-up phase. Telemedicine and web-based applications represent valuable tools for continuous monitoring of patients, facilitating timely and personalized intervention through effective communication between patients and healthcare providers. These actions can potentially improve the outcomes, well-being, and survival of cancer patients with cachexia.

Circulating factors in cancer cachexia: recent opportunities for translational research.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To discuss the recent discoveries and limitations of the available literature on emerging circulating biomarkers of cancer cachexia. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies on circulating factors in cancer cachexia show promising alternatives for diagnosing the syndrome in a minimally invasive manner in the clinic setting, as well as potential targets for cancer cachexia treatment. Factors secreted by the tumor and the adipose tissue, such as extracellular vesicles and soluble proteins, respectively, have been shown to either directly induce wasting in vitro and in vivo or to be altered in the cachectic phenotype. The detection and characterization of circulating cells allows detection of the precachectic stage and the levels of the soluble immune checkpoint protein programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) are correlated with the presence of the hallmarks of cancer cachexia. SUMMARY: Structural, molecular, and metabolic alterations have been observed in various tissues, revealing the occurrence of sustained inter-compartment crosstalk in cachectic patients. Early diagnosis of cancer cachexia becomes crucial to avoid the establishment of refractory cachexia through the implementation of interventions that may attenuate systemic inflammation and muscle loss. More studies on human cancer cachexia are required in order to address the recently discovered cachexia-associated circulating factors' value as biomarkers of the syndrome.

Handgrip Strength Predicts Survival in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a common cancer with a poor prognosis and is associated with a high prevalence of cachexia, a metabolic syndrome of muscle wasting due to complex mechanisms. In addition to loss of muscle mass, cancer patients also experience functional deterioration. The aim of this study is to determine whether there is an association between muscle mass and function and clinical outcomes, particularly survival. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study including all patients with PDAC at Monash Health from March 2016 to December 2017. We conducted body composition analysis for myopenia and handgrip strength testing. We constructed Kaplan-Meier curves to estimate whether myopenia and low hand grip strength were associated with poorer survival. RESULTS: Myopenia was not associated with a significant difference in PDAC-specific survival (log-rank P = 0.60). However, low handgrip strength was associated with significantly worse PDAC-specific survival compared with other patients (log-rank hazard ratio, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-3.09; P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between survival in PDAC and handgrip strength, but not anatomical muscle mass, suggests that functional testing of strength may be important in prognostication of patients with PDAC, alongside existing tools such as the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status.

Comprehensive evaluation of serum hepatic proteins in predicting prognosis among cancer patients with cachexia: an observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic proteins, including albumin, prealbumin, and transferrin have been confirmed to be prognostic predictors in various cancers. This study aimed to comprehensively assess the prognostic value of these three serum markers in patients with cancer cachexia. METHODS: This multicenter prospective cohort study included 1303 cancer cachexia patients, among whom 592 deaths occurred during a median follow-up of 20.23 months. The definition of cachexia was based on the 2011 international consensus. Concordance index (C-index) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were applied to compare the prognostic performance. The primary outcome was overall survival, which was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method generated by log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to identify independent predictors associated with survival. The secondary outcomes included 90-days mortality and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: C-index and ROC curves showed that albumin had the most accurate predictive capacity for survival, followed by transferrin and prealbumin. Multivariate Cox analysis confirmed that low albumin (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.51, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] = 1.28-1.80, P < 0.001), prealbumin (HR = 1.42, 95%CI = 1.19-1.69, P < 0.001), and transferrin (HR = 1.50, 95%CI = 1.25-1.80, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for long-term survival in cancer patients with cachexia. In subgroup analysis, the prognostic value of low albumin was significant in patients with upper gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary and pancreatic, and colorectal cancers; low prealbumin was significant in colorectal cancer; and low transferrin was significant in patients with upper gastrointestinal and colorectal cancer. All three hepatic proteins were valuable as prognostic predictors for patients with advanced (Stage III and IV) cancer with cachexia. The risks of 90-days mortality and impaired QoL were higher in cachexia patients with low albumin, prealbumin, and transferrin levels. CONCLUSION: Low albumin, prealbumin, and transferrin levels were all independent prognostic factors affecting patients with cancer cachexia, especially in patients in the advanced stages. These results highlight the value of routinely checking serum hepatic proteins in clinical practice to predict the prognosis of patients with cancer cachexia.

[The Second Web Questionnaire Survey on Cancer Cachexia Japanese Evidence for Patients Of Cancer Cachexia â ¡ (J-EPOCC â ¡)-Disease Awareness and Issues Related to Cancer Cachexia Among Healthcare Professionals].

In 2019, the Cancer Cachexia Web Questionnaire Survey(J-EPOCC)was conducted among cancer patients, their families and healthcare professionals in Japan, and it showed that the term"cancer cachexia"was highly recognized among health care professionals, whereas the staging and criteria for cancer cachexia defined by European Palliative Care Research Collaborative( EPCRC)was less understood. Also, many healthcare professionals tended to consider the term"cancer cachexia" as the terminal stage of cancer, and most of them lacked the knowledge that cancer cachexia is a disease complication which is potentially developed from the early stage of cancer. Since anamorelin was approved in 2021 for"Cancer cachexia in unresectable advanced or recurrent of non-small cell lung cancer, gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer and colorectal cancer", the treatment environment for cancer cachexia has greatly changed. Thus, the second Web Questionnaire Survey(J-EPOCC Ⅱ) was conducted in June 2022 to investigate changes in the problem awareness of cancer cachexia, especially appetite loss and weight loss, among patients and their families and healthcare professionals1). The results for healthcare professionals showed that the awareness of the staging and criteria has increased among doctors in 2022 compared with 2019, and an increasing number of doctors considered"cancer cachexia"was associated with loss of muscle mass, totally body weight loss, appetite loss and systemic inflammation that may occur in early stages of cancer. On the other hand, awareness of staging and diagnostic criteria for cancer cachexia has not remarkably changed among medical staff since 2019, with levels of awareness varying among those with different job categories. Therefore, in order to achieve early detection and intervention of cancer cachexia, it is necessary to raise the awareness of cancer cachexia among not only doctors but also medical staff by increasing their opportunities to get to know the disease condition, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer cachexia.

[The Second Web Questionnaire Survey on Cancer Cachexia Japanese Evidence for Patients Of Cancer Cachexiaâ ¡ (J-EPOCCâ ¡)-Challenges in Early Detection and Early Intervention for Appetite Loss and Weight Loss During Cancer Treatment].

In 2019, the Cancer Cachexia Web Questionnaire Survey(J-EPOCC), conducted among cancer patients, their families and healthcare professionals in Japan showed that nearly half of patients who had experienced appetite loss or weight loss during cancer treatment had not consulted with healthcare professionals about their symptoms, and it meant that patients missed the opportunity to receive medical intervention. Since anamorelin was approved in 2021 fo"r Cancer cachexia in non- small cell lung cancer, gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer and colorectal cancer", the treatment environment for cancer cachexia has greatly changed. Thus, the second Web Questionnaire Survey(J-EPOCCⅡ)was conducted in June 2022 to investigate changes in the problem awareness of cancer cachexia, especially appetite loss and weight loss, among patients and their family and healthcare professionals. The results showed that there was no apparent change in awareness of appetite loss and weight loss, suggesting many patients may miss treatment opportunities. Further disease awareness is required among patients and their families to enhance the understanding of the significance of therapeutic interventions for appetite loss or weight loss, and to call their attention for early detection and treatment.

Impacts of fluid retention on prognostic abilities of cachexia diagnostic criteria in cancer patients with refractory cachexia.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The international cancer cachexia criteria with a cutoff of 5% weight loss (WL) was proposed in Western patients. The Asian Working Group for Cachexia (AWGC) developed new criteria in Asian patients. The AWGC criteria are not cancer-specific and employ a cutoff of 2% WL. However, it is unclear whether both criteria are useful in patients with very advanced cancer because WL can be underestimated owing to fluid retention. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the impacts of fluid retention on the prognostic abilities of both criteria in cancer patients with weeks of survival. METHODS: This study involved a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study. The inclusion criteria constrained the study to adult patients with advanced cancer. Patients were divided into Non-cachexia and Cachexia groups using the international criteria and AWGC criteria. We performed time-to-event analyses using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests, and by conducting univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 402 patients were included in the analysis. Using the international criteria, the p-values for the log-rank test and stratified log-rank test for the mixed patients with and without fluid retention were 0.55 and 0.18, respectively. Using the AWGC criteria, the p-values for the log-rank test and stratified log-rank test for the mixed patients with and without fluid retention were 0.38 and 0.12, respectively. Without considering the impacts of fluid retention, no significant differences were observed between the Non-cachexia and Cachexia groups for both criteria. After adjusting for the status of fluid retention, significantly higher risks of mortality were not observed in the Cox proportional hazard model for the Cachexia group compared with the Non-cachexia group, for both criteria. However, significant associations were observed between fluid retention and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: The international criteria and AWGC criteria lost their prognostic abilities in cancer patients with weeks of survival. Since measurements of %WL were significantly confounded by fluid retention, fluid retention-adjusted criteria for cachexia need to be developed for cancer patients with refractory cachexia.