Data set for reporting of carcinoma of the adrenal cortex: explanations and recommendations of the guidelines from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting.

Complete resection of adrenal cortical carcinoma (ACC) with or without adjuvant therapy offers the best outcome. Recurrence is common, and in individual cases, the long-term outcome is difficult to predict, making it challenging to personalize treatment options. Current risk stratification approaches are based on clinical and conventional surgical pathology assessment. Rigorous and uniform pathological assessment may improve care for individual patients and facilitate multi-institutional collaborative studies. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) convened an expert panel to review ACC pathology reporting. Consensus recommendations were made based on the most recent literature and expert opinion. The data set comprises 23 core (required) items. The core pathological features include the following: diagnosis as per the current World Health Organization classification, specimen integrity, greatest dimension, weight, extent of invasion, architecture, percentage of lipid-rich cells, capsular invasion, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, atypical mitotic figures, coagulative necrosis, nuclear grade, mitotic count, Ki-67 proliferative index, margin status, lymph node status, and pathological stage. Tumors were dichotomized into low-grade (<20 mitoses per 10 mm2) and high-grade (>20 mitoses per 10 mm2) ones. Additional noncore elements that may be useful in individual cases included several multifactorial risk assessment systems (Weiss, modified Weiss, Lin-Weiss-Bisceglia, reticulin, Helsinki, and Armed Forces Institute of Pathology scores/algorithms). This data set is now available through the ICCR website with the hope of better standardizing pathological assessment of these relatively rare but important malignancies.

[Current criteria for the diagnosis of adrenocortical carcinoma]. / Sovremennye kriterii diagnostiki adrenokortikal'nogo raka.

Adrenocortical carcinoma is a rare malignant tumor of the adrenal cortex with an unfavorable prognosis. In 2017, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) published the 4th edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of Endocrine Organs. The updated classification reflects a multidisciplinary experience in diagnosing and predicting the course of adrenal cortex tumors, obtained on the basis of current studies. This paper highlights the key provisions of the updated WHO classification for adrenocortical carcinoma.

A Novel T-Stage Classification System for Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Proposal from the US Adrenocortical Carcinoma Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The 7th AJCC T-stage system for adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC), based on size and extra-adrenal invasion, does not adequately stratify patients by survival. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is a known poor prognostic factor. We propose a novel T-stage system that incorporates LVI to better risk-stratify patients undergoing resection for ACC. METHOD: Patients undergoing curative-intent resections for ACC from 1993 to 2014 at 13 institutions comprising the US ACC Group were included. Primary outcome was disease-specific survival (DSS). RESULTS: Of the 265 patients with ACC, 149 were included for analysis. The current T-stage system failed to differentiate patients with T2 versus T3 disease (p = 0.10). Presence of LVI was associated with worse DSS versus no LVI (36 mo vs. 168 mo; p = 0.001). After accounting for the individual components of the current T-stage system (size, extra-adrenal invasion), LVI remained a poor prognostic factor on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 2.14, 95% confidence interval 1.05-4.38, p = 0.04). LVI positivity further stratified patients with T2 and T3 disease (T2: 37 mo vs. median not reached; T3: 36 mo vs. 96 mo; p = 0.03) but did not influence survival in patients with T1 or T4 disease. By incorporating LVI, a new T-stage classification system was created: [T1: ≤ 5 cm, (-)local invasion, (+/-)LVI; T2: > 5 cm, (-)local invasion, (-)LVI OR any size, (+)local invasion, (-)LVI; T3: > 5 cm, (-)local invasion, (+)LVI OR any size, (+)local invasion, (+)LVI; T4: any size, (+)adjacent organ invasion, (+/-)LVI]. Each progressive new T-stage group was associated with worse median DSS (T1: 167 mo; T2: 96 mo; T3: 37 mo; T4: 15 mo; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the current T-stage system, the proposed T-stage system, which incorporates LVI, better differentiates T2 and T3 disease and accurately stratifies patients by disease-specific survival. If externally validated, this T-stage classification should be considered for future AJCC staging systems.

Mecanismos moleculares do efeito citotóxico de FGF2 em células transformadas por RAS / Molecular mechanisms of the cytotoxic effect of FGF2 in rastransformed cells

O FGF2 (Fibroblast Growth Factor 2) é um clássico fator peptídico de crescimento que ativa vias intracelulares de sinalização molecular promovendo a transição G0 → G1 e o comprometimento com o ciclo celular. Não surpreendentemente, seus papéis pró-tumoral e angiogênico estão bem caracterizados e estabelecidos na literatura. No entanto, um crescente corpo de evidências tem indicado que o FGF2 também pode exercer efeitos anti-tumorais in vitro e in vivo, em modelos murinos e também humanos. Neste contexto, nosso grupo publicou em 2008 que o FGF2 exerce um efeito antiproliferativo seletivo em células murinas malignas dependentes de alta atividade de K-Ras e H-Ras. Os genes ras compõem a família de oncogenes mais frequentemente mutada em tumores malignos humanos, alcançando aproximadamente 30% de todos os casos. O desenvolvimento de terapias contra tumores dependentes de Ras fracassou, apesar dos intensos esforços e investimentos desde a descoberta em 1982 de suas mutações ativadoras em múltiplos cânceres. O objetivo deste trabalho foi desvendar os mecanismos moleculares pelo quais o FGF2 inibe irreversivelmente a proliferação de células malignas dependentes da atividade de Ras, empregando como modelos experimentais a linhagem murina Y1 de células adrenocorticais, e 4 linhagens humanas derivadas de sarcomas de Ewing. Identificamos que o efeito citotóxico do FGF2 não se processa por um mecanismo novo e independente das viasproliferativas classicamente ativadas por fatores peptídicos de crescimento. Ao contrário, seu efeito tóxico é resultado de sinalização mitogênica exagerada decorrente de estimulação sustentada por FGF2. A ativação da via de MAPK, principal sinalização mitogênica intracelular, a níveis elevados e sustentados provoca estresse mitogênico, que se propaga para a fase S na forma de estresse replicativo. Nesta situação, a célula passa a depender exageradamente da sinalização protetora de ATR, de modo que a combinação de estimulação com FGF2 e inibição de ATR foi altamente letal para as células malignas dependentes de Ras empregadas neste trabalho. Também analisamos as bases moleculares de resistência a FGF2 exibida por células Y1 anteriormente selecionadas para resistir ao efeito tóxico do FGF2 (Y1FRs). Descobrimos que a pressão seletiva do FGF2 não teve efeito na expressão de seus receptores, mas provocou a eliminação de um dos dois cromossomos que portam a amplificação gênica de ras nesta linhagem, enquanto o segundo cromossomo foi mantido por ser a única fonte de genes ribossomais ativos. Suas cópias de ras, no entanto, mostraram-se transcricionalmente silenciadas. Além disso, as sublinhagens Y1FRs não expressam o principal RasGEF, GRP4, encontrado nas células parentais Y1, o que pode ter influenciado o surgimento do fenótipo resistente ao FGF2. As linhagens resistentes mostraram grande redução no número de cromossomos e aumento da frequência de fusões entre cromossomos não homólogos em relação às células parentais

FGF2 (Fibroblast Growth Factor 2) is a classic peptide growth factor that activates intracellular molecular signaling pathways promoting the G0 → G1 transition and cell cycle commitment. Not surprisingly, its pro-tumor and angiogenic roles are well characterized and established in the literature. However, a growing body of evidence has indicated that FGF2 may also exert anti-tumor effects in vitro and in vivo in murine and human models. In this context, our group reported in 2008 that FGF2 exerts a selective antiproliferative effect in murine cells dependent on high activity of K-Ras and H-Ras. Ras genes make up the most frequently mutated oncogene family in human malignant tumors, reaching approximately 30% of all cases. The development of therapies against Ras-dependent tumors has failed despite intense efforts and investments since the discovery in 1982 of its activating mutations in multiple cancers. The objective of this work was to uncover the molecular mechanisms by which FGF2 irreversibly inhibits the proliferation of malignant cells dependent on Ras activity, using as experimental models the Y1 murine lineage of adrenocortical malignant cells and 4 human lineages derived from Ewing sarcomas. We showed that the cytotoxic effect of FGF2 did not involve novel cell cycle regulatory pathways; instead, this cytotoxic effect is a result of sustainedhyper mitogenic stimulation by FGF2. Activation of the KRas/MAPK pathway, the major intracellular mitogenic signaling, at high and sustained levels provokes mitogenic stress, which is propagated to S phase as replicative stress. In this situation, the cell dependence on the ATR protective signaling is enhanced, so that the combination of stimulation with FGF2 and inhibition of ATR was highly lethal for the Ras dependent malignant cells employed in this work. We also analyzed the molecular basis of FGF2 resistance exhibited by Y1 cells previously selected for resistance to FGF2. We found that the selective pressure of FGF2 had no effect on the expression of its receptors but promoted the elimination of one of the two marker chromosomes that carry the K-ras amplified copies, while the second chromosome was maintained because it is the only source of active ribosomal genes; however, its K-ras amplified copies were transcriptionally silenced. In addition, the Y1FRs sublines did not express the main RasGEF, GRP4, found in the parental Y1 cells, which might have played a role in the emergence of the FGF2-resistant phenotype. The resistant Y1FRs sublines showed a large reduction in chromosome numbers and increased frequency of fusions between non-homologous chromosomes in relation to parental cells

Validation of the prognostic role of the "Helsinki Score" in 225 cases of adrenocortical carcinoma.

Adrenocortical carcinoma patient prognosis is extremely variable and poorly predictable. The newly introduced Helsinki Score is the first so far proposed diagnostic and prognostic system based on the combined evaluation of morphological (mitoses and necrosis) and immunohistochemical (Ki-67) parameters. The aim of the study was to validate the prognostic role of the Helsinki Score for adrenocortical carcinoma characterization. Thus, 225 adrenocortical carcinomas were reclassified using the Weiss Score and the Helsinki Score (3× mitotic count + 5 × necrosis + Ki-67 index). At univariate analysis, statistically significant prognostic values were observed at the log-rank test for mitotic count (cutoff values: <6 and ≥55; P<.0001), Ki-67 (cutoff values: <20 and ≥50; P<.0001), Weiss Score (cutoff values: <5 and ≥8; P<.0001), Helsinki Score (cutoff values: <13 and ≥19; P<.0001), histological variant (conventional versus oncocytic; P=.009), necrosis (P=.001), and stage (P=.005). Cox multivariate analysis using a backward stepwise selection method retained only Helsinki Score and Weiss Score as predictors of poor prognosis (P<.0001 and P=.0005, respectively). Helsinki Score (with a threshold of 28.5 points; area under the curve [AUC]=0.729, 95% confidence interval=0.66-0.79) and Ki-67 (with a threshold of 20.5%; AUC=0.727, 95% confidence interval=0.66-0.79) showed the best and equivalent AUCs predicting disease-related deaths determined using receiver operating characteristic statistics. In conclusion, the Helsinki Score is a valuable system to predict prognosis in adrenocortical carcinoma, outperforming the currently established prognostic parameters.

Dissecting Morphological and Molecular Heterogeneity in Adrenocortical Carcinoma.

Adrenocortical carcinoma is generally considered a single entity by pathologists and clinicians. Nevertheless, the knowledge cumulated along the last decade on the pathological characterization, the clinical outcome and the molecular pathogenesis of adrenocortical carcinoma demonstrate that one of the most relevant emerging issues is related to its heterogeneity. Three major morphological variants have been described (oncocytic, myxoid and sarcomatoid) but are not included in the current WHO classification, yet. Moreover, even "conventional" adrenocortical carcinomas have a high degree of morphological heterogeneity as well as different mitotic/proliferative capacity, either among different cases or within individual lesions. Furthermore, immunohistochemical and molecular studies, based on a wide set of different methodologies, identified novel biomarkers in adrenocortical carcinoma of diagnostic and prognostic relevance, which claimed again the concept that this tumor type represents an heterogeneous group of neoplasms which cannot be considered a unique entity. The integration between morphology, immunophenotype and molecular data is expected in the next years to build a novel concept of adrenocortical carcinoma classification into specific subgroups, as it is currently approached for other types of neoplasms such as breast or lung cancer, which are not merely descriptive, but also characterized by a specific biological and clinical behavior.

[Treatment of adrenocortical carcinomas is challenging]. / Diagnose og behandling af binyrebarkkarcinom.

Adrenocortical carcinomas (ACC) are rare tumours responsible for only 0.02% of the total number of malignant diseases. However the ACC are aggressive with a mean fiveyears survival of 20-50% and are often associated with increased production of adrenocortical hormones. The effect of the treatment is controversial and often based on small retrospective series or expert opinions. Centralization, international attention and collaboration in the treatment of ACC are mandatory. Randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the best treatment strategy in order to increase survival in patients with ACC.

Histologic and immunohistochemical classification of 41 bovine adrenal gland neoplasms.

Tumors of the adrenal glands are among the most frequent tumors in cattle; however, few studies have been conducted to describe their characteristics. The aim of this study was to classify 41 bovine adrenal neoplasms from 40 animals based on macroscopic and histologic examination, including electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry for melan A, synaptophysin, chromogranin A, vimentin, pan-cytokeratin, 2',3'-cyclic nucleotide-3'-phosphohydrolase (CNPase), and Ki-67. The tumors were classified as 23 adrenocortical adenomas, 12 adrenocortical carcinomas, 2 schwannomas, 2 pheochromocytomas (1 malignant), and 1 ganglioneuroma. Five histologic features were characteristic of metastasizing adrenocortical tumors: invasion of the capsule, vascular invasion, diffuse growth pattern, spindle-cell morphology, and nuclear pleomorphism. Adrenocortical tumors with at least 3 of these features were classified as malignant. Immunohistochemically, adrenocortical tumors expressed melan A (16/19), vimentin (14/26), cytokeratin (11/26), and chromogranin A (9/27), whereas pheochromocytomas expressed chromogranin A (2/2), synaptophysin (2/2), and vimentin (1/2). Both schwannomas expressed CNPase. An immunohistochemistry panel consisting of antibodies against melan A, synaptophysin, and CNPase was considered most useful to classify bovine adrenal tumors. However, the distinction between benign and malignant adrenocortical tumors was based on histologic features as in human medicine.

Current update on cytogenetics, taxonomy, diagnosis, and management of adrenocortical carcinoma: what radiologists should know.

OBJECTIVE: A multimodality imaging spectrum of adrenocortical carcinoma, with an emphasis on both anatomic and functional imaging, will be reviewed. Recent advances in the molecular cytogenetics of this tumor and its impact on diagnosis, prognosis, and development of newer targeted therapy will be discussed in this article. CONCLUSION: Adrenocortical carcinomas are rare aggressive tumors associated with a poor prognosis. Awareness of the molecular behavior and spectrum of imaging features of this tumor can help in appropriate patient treatment.

Adrenocortical neoplasia: evolving concepts in tumorigenesis with an emphasis on adrenal cortical carcinoma variants.

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare, heterogeneous malignancy with a poor prognosis. According to WHO classification 2004, ACC variants include oncocytic ACCs, myxoid ACCs and ACCs with sarcomatous areas. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review of these rare subtypes of adrenocortical malignancy and emphasize their clinicopathological features with the aim of elucidating aspects of diagnostic categorization, differential diagnostics and biological behavior. The issue of current terminology, applied to biphasic tumors with pleomorphic, sarcomatous or sarcomatoid elements arising in adrenal cortex, is also discussed. We additionally present emerging evidence concerning the adrenal cortical tumorigenesis and the putative adenoma-carcinoma sequence as well.

Recent advances in histopathology and immunohistochemistry of adrenocortical carcinoma.

Discerning malignancy in resected adrenocortical neoplasms can pose diagnostic difficulty. Macroscopic examination is the first important step toward diagnosis and should include accurate measurement of weight and dimension of the specimens and description of the cut surface of the tumors. It is also important to sample the specimens for histological diagnosis near foci of hemorrhage and/or necrosis. Histological scoring systems evaluating multiple parameters, especially the criteria of Weiss, have been shown to be reliable in differential diagnosis between adrenocortical adenoma and carcinoma. A tumor is defined as adrenocortical carcinoma when three or more of the following criteria are met; (1) high nuclear grade, (2) mitotic rate six or more per 50 high power fields, (3) atypical mitosis, (4) clear cells less than 25%, (5) a diffuse architecture pattern in more than one-third of the tumor, (6) confluent necrosis, (7) venous invasion, (8) sinusoidal invasion, and (9) capsular invasion. The criteria are relatively straightforward and considered the most effective standard for diagnosis of adrenocortical malignancy. However, great care should be taken in applying the criteria to histological evaluation of two relatively rare and peculiar adrenocortical tumors, adrenocortical oncocytoma and pediatric adrenocortical neoplasms. At this juncture, ancillary biological or molecular markers are of little practical value in terms of differential diagnosis between adrenocortical adenoma and carcinoma but tumors with MIB1 or Ki-67 labeling index more than 2.5 may be considered malignant. Prognostic markers of adrenocortical carcinoma have not been established other than complete respectability of the tumor. There are also no surrogate markers for predicting response to therapy with Mitotane, an adrenolytic agent. It sometimes is important for surgical pathologists to differentiate adrenocortical carcinoma from metastatic malignancies of other sites. An immunohistochemical evaluation of adrenal 4 binding protein (Ad4BP) or SF-1, a transcription factor of all steroidogenesis, can aid in this differential diagnosis because nuclear immunoreactivity for this transcription factor is relatively specific to steroid producing cells.

Histopathological diagnosis and prognostic factors in adrenocortical carcinoma.

A great majority of adrenocortical tumors are benign, and many adrenocortical carcinomas (ACC) are obviously malignant at presentation. The histopathological diagnosis of ACC is occasionally difficult, particularly with stage I and stage II disease. The prognosis of ACC is generally poor. Surgery is the major treatment, with chemotherapy and radiotherapy being applicable to only restricted patients. The Weiss criteria are useful in diagnosing the common adult type of ACC. Histopathological prognostic factors of ACC have not been fully established because of the rarity of the disease. In this article, we first describe the current histopathological diagnostic and prognostic factors of ACC, highlighting the special types of ACC to which Weiss's criteria are not fully applicable. These special type tumors include pediatric adrenocortical tumors, oncocytomas, and aldosterone-producing tumors of pure zona glomerulosa type. Then we present three cases with unusual small adrenocortical tumors. One patient had an unequivocal ACC showing metastatic disease. One had a histologically defined ACC with no metastasis or macroscopic invasion. The third was a pediatric patient with a tumor showing a nodule-in-nodule pattern with insulin-like growth factor II expression.

Virilising adrenocortical tumours in children.

UNLABELLED: Adrenocortical tumours (ACT) are a rare but important cause of virilisation in infancy and childhood. Four cases of virilising ACT are presented. Two girls (age 0.9 years and 3.9 years) and two boys (age 6.2 years and 6.4 years) had symptoms and signs of virilisation before the age of 6 years. Diagnosis of a virilising adrenal tumour was confirmed by laboratory tests, diagnostic imaging and histology. However, one female patient was misdiagnosed and treated for 3 months as atypical congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Ultrasonography of the adrenal region could not visualise the tumour in three out of four cases. The most sensitive method of diagnostic imaging was MRI. In all cases, treatment consisted of complete surgical resection of the adrenal tumour by open abdominal surgery. Immunohistochemistry was performed in all patients and in two patients there was an overexpression of p53, indicating p53 mutation and in three cases the ki67 proliferation index was greater than 5%. The classification of ACT in childhood is extremely difficult. Histology scores adapted from adrenal tumours in adults and molecular markers are under investigation, but there is still not enough clinical experience since ACT are so rare. CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up is mandatory not only because of the uncertainty in classification of adrenocortical tumours, but also for observation of growth and pubertal development.

Discerning malignancy in resected adrenocortical neoplasms.

Differential diagnosis between adenoma and carcinoma in resected human adrenocortical neoplasms may be one of the most problematic and difficult areas of surgical pathology practice. This is especially true in cases of relatively small adrenocortical tumors not associated with obvious signs of malignancy such as necrosis and/or hemorrhage. In addition, the numbers of these small adrenocortical neoplasms are increasing owing to the widespread application of sophisticated computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging scans. No single parameter can be effective in this differential diagnosis of resected adrenocortical tumor. Histopathologic evaluation using a multivariate scoring system is considered most effective in discerning malignancy and biologic behavior of resected adrenocortical neoplasms. Molecular and cellular findings of adrenocortical carcinoma have been inconsistent except for the increased cell proliferation associated with adrenocortical malignancy. Therefore, an assessment of neoplastic cell proliferation using immunostains of cell cycle-associated nuclear antigen such as Ki-67 is the only useful auxiliary method of evaluating malignancy in resected adrenocortical neoplasms at present.