Analysis of predictive factors for late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after surgical ablation in patients undergoing rheumatic valve surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To identify independent predictors of late recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after surgical ablation in patients undergoing rheumatic valve surgery. METHODS: A total of 258 patients who underwent surgical ablation for AF with rheumatic heart disease at our hospital between January 2019 and June 2022 were retrospectively included. The patients were followed up for 12 months. Late recurrence was defined as any AF recurrence longer than 30 s between 3 and 12 months. Patients with or without late recurrence were divided into non-recurrence and recurrence groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the predictors of late recurrence. RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality rate was 0.8% (2/258), and the late recurrence rate of AF was 38.4%, including 152 and 95 cases in the non-recurrent and recurrent groups respectively, with a follow-up completion rate of 96.5% (247/256). There were no deaths during follow-up, two patients (0.8%) experienced a stroke, and one patient (0.4%) experienced gastrointestinal hemorrhage. The results of the univariate and multivariate analyses of the preoperative risk factors for late recurrence showed a left atrial (LA) anteroposterior diameter ≥ 52.9 mm (odds ratio [OR] = 2.366, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.089-5.138, P = 0.030], ratio of the superoinferior to the anteroposterior diameters of LA (S-AR) < 1.19 (OR = 4.639, 95% CI = 2.181-9.865, P < 0.001), and AF duration ≥ 39 months (OR = 6.152, 95% CI = 2.897-13.061, P < 0.001), and cardiothoracic ratio ≥ 0.63 (OR = 2.716, 95% CI = 1.314-5.612, P = 0.007) were the most significant independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: LA anteroposterior diameter ≥ 52.9 mm, S-AR < 1.19, and AF duration ≥ 36 months and cardiothoracic ratio ≥ 0.63 are independent predictors for late recurrence of AF after surgical ablation in patients undergoing rheumatic valve surgery.

An observational study on the application of fast-track cardiac anesthesia using target-controlled infusion of sufentanil and propofol in valve replacement surgery.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of fast-track cardiac anesthesia using target-controlled infusion of sufentanil and propofol in valve replacement surgery. The clinical data of 88 patients with rheumatic heart disease undergoing valve replacement surgery were retrospectively analyzed and grouped based on different treatment methods. Among them, 44 cases received fast-track cardiac anesthesia using target-controlled infusion of fentanyl and propofol from November 2019 to July 2021 were set as the control group, and 44 cases received fast-track cardiac anesthesia using target-controlled infusion of sufentanil and propofol from August 2021 to February 2022 were set as the study group. The study group showed shorter postoperative awakening time, extubation time, and hospital stay duration, and lower dosage of dopamine and nitroglycerin consumption compared to the control group (P < .05). At T5 and T6, both groups exhibited higher ACTH, cortisol (Cor), and C3a than at T0, and the study group showed significantly lower ACTH, Cor, and C3a at T5 and T6 than the control group (P < .05). At T7, the control group showed higher ACTH, Cor, and C3a than at T0, and ACTH, Cor, and C3a were significantly lower in the study group than in the control group at T7 (P < .05). Fast-track cardiac anesthesia using target-controlled infusion of sufentanil and propofol in valve replacement surgery has demonstrated favorable application effects, which stabilizes hemodynamics, alleviates myocardial damage, suppresses endocrine stress responses, and does not increase adverse reactions, thereby exhibiting good safety.

Left atrial mechanical dispersion and left atrial stiffness predicts recurrence of atrial fibrillation: In patients with moderate-severe rheumatic mitral stenosis.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between preoperative left atrial function and recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after mitral valve surgery and Cox Maze procedure in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS) combined with AF, in order to facilitate clinical risk stratification and to guide treatment strategies. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatic MS attending Beijing Anzhen Hospital of Capital Medical University from April 2022 to September 2023 were prospectively collected, and all of them underwent transthoracic two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography to assess left atrial structure and function before undergoing mitral valve surgery and Cox Maze procedure and postoperative follow-up. 121 patients were enrolled, of whom 77.69 % (94/121) were female, with a median follow-up time of 9.56 ± 1.83 months, and 48 patients (39.7 %, 48/121) had postoperative recurrence of AF. Preoperative left atrial stiffness index (LASI) [3.76(3.10-5.44) vs. 2.41(1.75-3.33), P < 0.001] and left atrial mechanical dispersion (SD-TPS) (15.84 ± 5.92vs. 11.58 ± 5.96, P = 0.001) were significantly higher in the postoperative AF recurrence group than in the without recurrence group; Multivariable cox regression analysis showed that LASI>3.15 and SD -TPS > 13.2 were associated with independent risk factors for AF recurrence (hazard ratio = 2.957, 95 %CI,1.366-6.399, P = 0.006 and hazard ratio = 2.892, 95 %CI,1.381-6.057, P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: LASI and SD-TPS were effective predictors of postoperative recurrence of AF in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatic MS, and LASI >3.15 and SD-TPS% >13.2 were independent influences on the recurrence of AF after Cox Maze in this group of patients.

A case of anaphylactic shock to human fibrinogen infusion during cardiac surgery.

Human fibrinogen (FIB) has been clinically proven to be considerably effective for the treatment of postoperative bleeding, with reported cases of allergic reactions to human FIB being rare. Here, we report a case of an anaphylactic shock in 27-year-old patients with rheumatic heart valve disease who received a human FIB infusion during mitral valve replacement, aortic valve replacement, and tricuspid valve-shaping surgery. The patients showed generalised profuse sweating, a barely noticeable skin rash, faint pulse, systolic pressure < 50 mmHg, and a heart rate of 71 beats/min. We share insights from a case of severe allergy to human FIB infusion during cardiac surgery, through which we have gained experience in the processes of diagnosing and treating. This report aims to provide a preliminary summary of the characteristics of this case to serve as a reference for fellow clinicians.

Comparison of Mitral Valve Repair Versus Percutaneous Mitral Balloon Commissurotomy for Patients With Rheumatic Heart Disease: A Single-Centre Study.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous mitral balloon commissurotomy (PMBC) is the standard treatment option for patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS), according to current guidelines. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of rheumatic mitral valve repair (rMVR) and PMBC in this patient population. METHODS: Baseline, clinical, and follow-up data from 703 patients with rheumatic heart disease who underwent PMBC or rMVR at the current centre were collected and analysed. A 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching method was used to balance the differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The primary outcome was mitral valve reoperation, and the secondary outcome was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Propensity score matching generated 101 patient pairs for comparison. In the matched population, there were no significant differences in the early clinical outcomes between the groups. The median follow-up time was 40.9 months. Overall, patients in the rMVR group had a statistically significantly lower risk of mitral valve reoperation than those in the PMBC group (HR 0.186; 95% CI 0.041-0.835; p=0.028). Regarding all-cause mortality, no statistically significant differences were observed between the rMVR and PMBC groups (HR 4.065; 95% CI 0.454-36.374; p=0.210). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PMBC, rMVR has more advantages for the correction of valve lesions; therefore, it may offer a better prognosis than PMBC in select patients with rheumatic MS. However, this finding needs to be verified in future studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods.

A simple, ingenious approach for intra-operative detection of coronary cameral fistula.

A 56-year-old female presented to us with rheumatic mitral stenosis with a left atrial clot. We found one coronary cameral fistula on the coronary angiography from the posterior left ventricular branch to the left ventricle. She was taken up for surgical mitral valve replacement and clot removal. A residual coronary fistula may increase the risk of infective endocarditis, especially in the presence of mechanical prosthesis. Henceforth, intra-operatively, we used the methylene blue dye injection as an easy technique to detect and safely close the coronary fistula from inside the left ventricular chamber. She recovered smoothly with a successful outcome.

Lack of awareness of secondary rheumatic prevention in preoperative candidates for mitral valve surgery - alarming situation.

BACKGROUND: We conducted this study to assess the compliance with secondary rheumatic prophylaxis among preoperative patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease undergoing valvular heart surgery at a tertiary care cardiac hospital in a developing country. METHODS: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary care cardiac hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. The inclusion criteria encompassed patients of any sex, aged between 18 and 80 years, who had been diagnosed with rheumatic mitral valve disease through transthoracic echocardiography and had undergone valvular heart surgery. The level of compliance with secondary rheumatic prophylaxis and barriers toward noncompliance was assessed during routine preoperative interview session. This preventive measure plays a crucial role in reducing the progression of the disease and improving patient outcomes. RESULTS: Out of the 239 patients included in the study, 125 (52.3%) were females, with a mean age of 38.8 ± 11.8 years. The majority of patients (88.7%) came from rural areas. Among the patients, 79 (33.1%) received rheumatic prophylaxis, while 160 (66.9%) did not adhere to it regularly. The common barriers for receiving rheumatic prophylaxis were non availability (41.0%) and nonaffordability (40.6%). Additionally, 28.0% of patients had lacked awareness of the importance of rheumatic prophylaxis, and 2.5% expressed fear of injection site pain and subsequent symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: A concerning level of noncompliance with secondary rheumatic prophylaxis was observed. The barriers identified in patients who did not receive rheumatic prophylaxis were primarily related to affordability, availability, lack of awareness, and fear of injection site pain and subsequent symptoms.

Heart Transplantation in a Patient With Rheumatic Heart Disease and Severe Left Atrial Calcification.

A 62-year-old woman who had undergone mitral valve replacement 24 years ago was admitted to the hospital with congestive heart failure. She needed heart transplantation for stage D heart failure. Preoperative cardiac computed tomographic scans showed a severely calcified left atrium and a large right atrium. Given that the left atrium's calcification was too severe to suture, the calcified left atrial wall was broadly resected, and the resected left atrial wall was reconstructed with a bovine pericardial patch for anastomosis with the donor's left atrial wall. The operation was completed without heavy bleeding, and the patient was discharged from the hospital with no complications.

Delayed Diagnosis of Pulmonary Artery Thrombosis in a Patient Undergoing Mitral Valve Replacement.

ABSTRACT: The occurrence of pulmonary artery thrombus in association with rheumatic mitral stenosis is a rare complication. Pulmonary artery thrombus formation may worsen pulmonary artery pressures, and this may precipitate acute right heart failure. The possible mechanisms behind pulmonary artery thrombus formation during mitral valve replacement surgery could be acute coagulopathy following surgery, the presence of chronic pulmonary thromboembolism, or chronic atrial fibrillation. We report an unusual case of pulmonary artery thrombus in a patient with rheumatic MS which was diagnosed with transoesophageal echocardiography after MVR.

A review regarding the article 'Comparative efficacy and safety of mitral valve repair versus mitral valve replacement in Rheumatic heart disease: A high-value care systematic review and meta-analysis'.

Rheumatic heart disease remains a major cause of cardiovascular death worldwide. Limited real-world nationwide data are available to compare the long-term outcomes between mitral valve repair and replacement in rheumatic heart disease. For patients with RHD, MVP is the superior choice of surgical intervention owing to better long-term survival, reduced incidence of early mortality and thromboembolic events. However, it entails higher chances of re-operation at follow-up at four, eight and twelve years. Although feasible, surgeons may opt for MVR in patients with a worse prognosis. Whereas degenerative mitral repair for severe MR has been proven superior to replacement, the optimal operative strategy for mitral RHD remains unclear. In developing countries, mitral RHD commonly develops in young patients, predominantly consists of MR rather than MS, and occurs more frequently than in the United States. In addition, the predominant MR etiology (rather than MS), relatively early intervention in the RHD timeline, and variation in Carpentier MR types among developing world populations further make these rheumatic MVs more amenable to repair than replacement. Patients should be carefully selected for mitral valve repair because of its higher reoperation rate, particularly those with previous percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy. Careful assessment of anterior leaflet mobility/calcification to determine mitral repair or replacement was associated with improved outcomes. This decision-making strategy may alter the threshold for rheumatic mitral replacement in the current valve-in-valve era.

Combined transcatheter aortic valve and tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation in a patient with a mitral mechanical prosthesis.

Despite progressively uncommon in Western countries, rheumatic heart disease still portrays a significant global burden. In elderly or high-surgical risk patients, plurivalvular disease may require a complex percutaneous approach. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with previous monoleaflet mitral prosthesis is challenging due to interference between the aortic valve and the rigid mitral mechanical prosthesis "ring." Prior cases report the use of CoreValve or Edwards Sapien aortic valves in patients with adequate mitro-aortic distance. Performing a second major procedure, such as tricuspid valve-in-valve (TVIV), sequentially during a single percutaneous intervention, increases treatment complexity. An 83-year-old woman with rheumatic heart disease, with previous implantation of a Bjork-Shiley monoleaflet mitral prosthesis, and Carpentier-Edwards 29 tricuspid bioprosthesis presented with decompensated heart failure due to severe aortic stenosis and tricuspid bioprosthesis stenosis. After HeartTeam discussion, the patient was deemed as inoperable due to a prohibitive surgical risk. As an alternative, a TAVI (Navitor FlexNav) and a transcatheter TVIV replacement (Edwards Sapiens 3 Ultra) were discussed and proposed, with both techniques being performed sequentially in a single procedure. TAVI in a patient with a previous monoleaflet mitral mechanical prosthesis and TVIV may be a feasible approach in inoperable patients with plurivalvular disease.

Successful treatment of severe primary mitral regurgitation due to rheumatic aetiology using a novel-designed transcatheter edge-to-edge repair system.

The transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER) has been recommended as a reliable treatment option for selected patients with severe degenerative and functional mitral regurgitation (MR). Although MR patients with rheumatic etiology were excluded from two significant trials (EVEREST II and COAPT) that established a role for the TEER in degenerative and functional MR. However, it has been reported that the TEER procedure could be safely and effectively performed in carefully selected rheumatic MR patients. Therefore, we share a case report of successfully treating severe rheumatic MR using a novel-designed TEER system (JensClipTM).

Comparative efficacy and safety of mitral valve repair versus mitral valve replacement in Rheumatic heart disease: A high-value care systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHD) remains a leading cause of cardiovascular death (CVD) globally. Mitral Valve repair (MVP) and mitral valve replacement (MVR) are the two most commonly and successfully used techniques to treat the disease. MVP is associated with reduced post-operative complications compared to MVR; however, it carries the risk of valvular fibrosis and scarring. Given the lack of recommendations, inconsistent findings, and paucity of pathophysiological evidence at present, we aimed to conduct a meta-analysis and systematically review the available literature to determine the efficacy and safety of MVP compared to MVR in improving clinical outcomes among patients with RHD. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Central and Scopus from inception till September 2023. The primary objective was early mortality defined as any cause-related death occurring 30 days following surgery. Secondary outcomes included long-term survival defined as the time duration between hospital discharge and all-cause death. Infectious endocarditis, thromboembolic events (including stroke, brain infarction, peripheral embolism, valve thrombosis, and transient ischemic attack), and haemorrhagic events (any serious bleeding event that required hospitalisation, resulted in death, resulted in permanent injury, or required blood transfusion) were all considered as post- operative complications. Additionally aggregated Kaplan-Meier curves were reconstructed for long term survival, freedom from reoperation, and freedom from valve-related adverse events by merging the reconstructed individual patient data (IPD) from each individual study. A significant decrease in early mortality with MV repair strategy versus MV replacement [RR 0.63; P = 0.003) irrespective of mechanical or bioprosthetic valves was noted. The results reported significantly higher long-term survival in patients undergoing MVP versus MVR (HR 0.53; P = 0.0009). Reconstructed Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the long term survival rates at 4, 8, and 12 years were 88.6, 82.0, 74.6 %, in the MVR group and 91.7, 86.8, 81.0 %, in the MVP group, respectively. MVP showed statistically significant reduction in early mortality, adverse vascular events, and better long-term survival outcomes compared to the MVR strategy in this analysis.

Percutaneous treatment of an early complication after endocarditis surgery with Cabrol type repair.

We present a 70-year-old man with rheumatic mitral valve disease who had undergone 3 previous open-heart surgeries, the last of which was a new mitral valve replacement for a mechanical prosthesis due to early bioprosthetic endocarditis.

[Technical exploration and early results of two-port total thoracoscopic aortic-mitral double-valve replacement].

Objective: To examine the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing total thoracoscopic aortic-mitral double-valve replacement. Methods: This is a retrospective case series study. The clinical data of 50 patients who underwent double-valve replacement under a total thoracoscopic two-port approach from November 2021 to August 2022 in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. There were 32 males and 18 females, with an age of (55.3±8.8) years (range: 21 to 62 years). Among them, 36 cases had rheumatic heart disease and 14 cases had infective endocarditis. The 3rd intercostal space between the right anterior axillary line and the midclavicular line was selected as the main operating hole, the total thoracoscopic double-valve replacement were successfully carried out. Baseline data, intraoperative information, surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications were collected for all patients. Results: The cardiopulmonary bypass time was (168.2±30.9) minutes (range: 125 to 187 minutes), the aortic cross-clamping time was (118.8±16.5) minutes (range: 96 to 147 minutes). Five patients received bioprosthetic valves, and 45 received mechanical prosthetic valves. Postoperative mechanical ventilation lasted (9.6±3.4) hours (range: 5.1 to 14.2 hours), the ICU stay was (24.8±7.3) hours (range: 16.3 to 30.1 hours), and the postoperative hospital stay was (6.5±1.2) days (range: 5.0 to 8.0 days). Four patients received red blood cell transfusions of (2.7±0.9) units (range: 2 to 4 units), and the postoperative chest drainage volume was (222.1±56.3) ml (range: 175 to 289 ml). No deaths occurred intraoperatively or in the early postoperative period. One patient required reoperation due to bleeding in the aortic incision. Three patients had mild to moderate paravalvular leakage around the prosthetic aortic valve, with no cases of third-degree atrioventricular block or conversions to median sternotomy. Conclusions: The early outcomes of total thoracoscopic double valve replacement surgery are satisfactory, demonstrating safety and efficacy. This surgical approach expands the scope of total thoracoscopic cardiac surgery, which warrants further investigation and research.

Scoring model based on cardiac CT and clinical factors to predict early good mitral valve repair in rheumatic mitral disease.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the mitral valve calcification and mitral structure detected by cardiac computed tomography (cardiac CT) and establish a scoring model based on cardiac CT and clinical factors to predict early good mitral valve repair (EGMR) and guide surgical strategy in rheumatic mitral disease (RMD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective bi-center cohort study. Based on cardiac CT, mitral valve calcification and mitral structure in RMD were quantified and evaluated. The primary outcome was EGMR. A logical regression algorithm was applied to the scoring model. RESULTS: A total of 579 patients were enrolled in our study from January 1, 2019, to August 31, 2022. Of these, 443 had baseline cardiac CT scans of adequate quality. The calcification quality score, calcification and thinnest part of the anterior leaflet clean zone, and papillary muscle symmetry were the independent CT factors of EGMR. Coronary artery disease and pulmonary artery pressure were the independent clinical factors of EGMR. Based on the above six factors, a scoring model was established. Sensitivity = 95% and specificity = 95% were presented with a cutoff value of 0.85 and 0.30 respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic of external validation set was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Mitral valve repair is recommended when the scoring model value > 0.85 and mitral valve replacement is prior when the scoring model value < 0.30. This model could assist in guiding surgical strategies for RMD. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The model established in this study can serve as a reference indicator for surgical repair in rheumatic mitral valve disease. KEY POINTS: • Cardiac CT can reflect the mitral structure in detail, especially for valve calcification. • A model based on cardiac CT and clinical factors for predicting early good mitral valve repair was established. • The developed model can help cardiac surgeons formulate appropriate surgical strategies.

Midterm Outcome of Valve Repair for Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis: 6-year Experience in a Single Mid-Volume Cardiac Center.

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have reported satisfactory long-term results of mitral valve (MV) repair for rheumatic mitral disease. However, the effects of this procedure in isolated rheumatic mitral stenosis remain unclear. In addition, protective effects of MV repair on cardiac function have not been verified in rheumatic MV disease. This study retrospectively evaluated early mortality and mid-term results of MV repair for isolated rheumatic mitral stenosis in a mid-volume cardiac centre, and explored the effects of this procedure on cardiac function. METHODS: Between January 2015 and May 2021, 360 patients with isolated rheumatic mitral stenosis and combined (concomitant) atrial fibrillation (AF) underwent MV repair (100 patients) or MV replacement (260 patients). Perioperative characteristics were compared between the two groups and a regression analysis for early mortality and mid-term left ventricular ejection fraction was conducted. In addition, mid-term survival was compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the two groups were balanced after matching. Compared with patients in the replacement group, patients with MV repair had a lower occurrence of postoperative hypotension and AF. There was no difference in early mortality or mid-term survival between the two groups. However, MV repair was associated with a higher mid-term left ventricular ejection fraction. During follow-up, four thromboembolic events and four haemorrhagic events occurred in the replacement group. No blood coagulation-related complications occurred in the repair group. CONCLUSION: Mitral valve repair for isolated rheumatic mitral stenosis and concomitant AF was feasible in a mid-volume cardiac centre, with satisfactory perioperative results and mid-term outcomes. Furthermore, this procedure preserved mid-term left ventricular systolic function.

Surgical aortic valve replacement etiologies, hemodynamics, and outcomes in 1346 patients from the Malaysian heart centre.

BACKGROUND: This study examined the characteristics and outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) both isolated and in combination with other cardiac surgery in Malaysia from 2015 to 2021. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 1346 patients analyzed on the basis of medical records, echocardiograms and surgical reports. The overall sample was both considered as a whole and divided into aortic stenosis (AS)/aortic regurgitation (AR)-predominant and similar-severity subgroups. RESULTS: The most common diagnosis was severe AS (34.6%), with the 3 most common etiologies being bicuspid valve degeneration (45.3%), trileaflet valve degeneration (36.3%) and rheumatic valve disease (12.2%). The second most common diagnosis was severe AR (25.5%), with the most common etiologies being root dilatation (21.0%), infective endocarditis (IE) (16.6%) and fused prolapse (12.2%). Rheumatic valve disease was the most common mixed disease. A total of 54.5% had AS-predominant pathology (3 most common etiologies: bicuspid valve degeneration valve, degenerative trileaflet valve and rheumatic valve disease), 36.9% had AR-predominant pathology (top etiologies: root dilatation, rheumatic valve disease and IE), and 8.6% had similar severity of AS and AR. Overall, 62.9% of patients had trileaflet valve morphology, 33.3% bicuspid, 0.6% unicuspid and 0.3% quadricuspid. For AS, the majority were high-gradient severe AS (49.9%), followed by normal-flow low-gradient (LG) severe AS (10.0%), paradoxical low-flow (LF)-LG severe AS (6.4%) and classical LF-LG severe AS (6.1%). The overall in-hospital and total 1-year mortality rates were 6.4% and 14.8%, respectively. Pure severe AS had the highest mortality. For AS-predominant pathology, the etiology with the highest mortality was trileaflet valve degeneration; for AR-predominant pathology, it was dissection. The overall survival probability at 5 years was 79.5% in all patients, 75.7% in the AS-predominant subgroup, 83.3% in the AR-predominant subgroup, and 87.3% in the similar-severity subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: The 3 most common causes of AS- predominant patients undergoing SAVR is bicuspid valve degeneration, degenerative trileaflet valve and rheumatic and for AR-predominant is root dilatation, rheumatic and IE. Rheumatic valve disease is an important etiology in our SAVR patients especially in mixed aortic valve disease. Study registration IJNREC/562/2022.