Tube cecostomy versus appendicostomy for antegrade enemas in the management of fecal incontinence in children: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have directly compared between cecostomy and appendicostomy for the management of fecal incontinence in pediatric population. This systematic review of the literature describes outcomes and complications following both procedures. We also reviewed studies reporting impact on quality of life and patient satisfaction. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar were searched for chronic constipation pediatric patients who underwent cecostomy or appendicostomy. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality. RESULTS: An initial literature search retrieved 633 citations. After review of all abstracts, 40 studies were included in the final analysis, assessing a total of 2086 patients. The overall rate of complications was lower in the cecostomy group compared to the appendicostomy group (16.6% and 42.3%, respectively). Achievement of fecal continence and improvement in patient quality of life were found to be similar in both groups, however the need for revision of surgery was approximately 15% higher in the appendicostomy group. CONCLUSION: Cecostomy has less post procedural complications, however rates of patient satisfaction and impact on quality of life were similar following both procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The percutaneous cecostomy tube in the management of fecal incontinence in children.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate experience with percutaneous cecostomies and their long-term outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June 1994 and March 2009, 290 patients (mean age, 10.1 y) with fecal incontinence underwent percutaneous cecostomy tube placement and subsequent tube management. Technical success, procedural complications, and long-term follow-up until March 2012 were evaluated. RESULTS: A cecostomy was successfully placed in 284 patients (98%), and 257 of 280 patients (92%) underwent a successful exchange to a low-profile tube. A total of 1,431 routine exchanges to low-profile tubes were reviewed in 258 patients (mean, 1.6 ± 1.3 routine tube changes per 1,000 days). Eighty-five patients (29%) experienced one or more early problems after cecostomy, and 10 (3%) had major complications. In the total 463,507 tube-days, 938 late problems were noted: 917 (98%) minor and 22 (2%) major. Forty patients had the cecostomy catheter removed and 141 "graduated" to an adult health care facility. CONCLUSIONS: The percutaneous cecostomy procedure provides a safe management option for fecal incontinence in the pediatric population.

[Treatment of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie's Syndrome). Systematic review]. / Traitement dela Pseudo-Obstruction Colique Aigue (Syndrome d'Ogilvie) Revue Systématique de la Littérature.

BACKGROUND: Ogilvie's syndrome is acute colonic dilatation without organic obstacle in a previously healthy colon. Surgery is the only treatment of cases complicated by necrosis or perforation. In contrast, treatment of uncomplicated forms is not unanimous, and is the subject of this literature review. AIMS: Determine the results of different therapeutic methods of uncomplicated forms of Ogilvie's syndrome in terms of efficiency of removal of colonic distension, recurrence, morbidity and mortality. Clarify their respective indications. METHODS: An electronic literature search in the "MEDLINE" database, supplemented by hand searching on the reference lists of articles, was conducted for the period between 1980 and 2012. RESULTS: Conservative treatment is effective in 53 to 96% of cases with a risk of colonic perforation less than 2.5% and a mortality of 0 to 14% % (level of evidence 4, recommendation grade C). Neostigmine is effective in 64 to 91% of cases after a first dose, with a risk of recurrence of 0 to 38%. It remains effective in 40 to 100% of cases after a second dose (evidence level 2, grade recommendation B). Endoscopic decompression is a safe and effective technique with a success rate of 61 to 100% at the first attempt , a recurrence rate of 0 to 50%, a rate of colonic perforation less than 5% and a mortality less than 5% (level evidence 4, recommendation grade C). PEG may be recommended for the prevention of recurrence of the ACPO after successful treatment with neostigmine or endoscopic decompression (evidence level 2, recommendation grade B). The cecostomy is more effective and safer than conventional colostomy (level of evidence 4, recommendation grade C). The cecostomy is highly effective in colonic decompression but associated with a high mortality (level of evidence 4, recommendation grade C). CONCLUSION: Conservative treatment is recommended in first intention. In case of failure, neostigmine should be tried. If unsuccessful, the endoscopic decompression is proposed. The cecostomy is indicated as a last resort after failure of endoscopic decompression.

Management of pediatric patients with refractory constipation who fail cecostomy.

BACKGROUND: Antegrade continence enema (ACE) is a recognized therapeutic option in the management of pediatric refractory constipation. Data on the long-term outcome of patients who fail to improve after an ACE-procedure are lacking. PURPOSE: To describe the rate of ACE bowel management failure in pediatric refractory constipation, and the management and long term outcome of these patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients that underwent ACE-procedure and had at least 3-year-follow-up. Detailed analysis of subsequent treatment and outcome of those patients with a poor functional outcome was performed. RESULTS: 76 patients were included. 12 (16%) failed successful bowel management after ACE requiring additional intervention. Mean follow-up was 66.3 (range 35-95 months) after ACE-procedure. Colonic motility studies demonstrated colonic neuropathy in 7 patients (58%); abnormal motility in 4 patients (33%), and abnormal left-sided colonic motility in 1 patient (9%). All 12 patients were ultimately treated surgically. Nine patients (75%) had marked clinical improvement, whereas 3 patients (25%) continued to have poor function issues at long term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Colonic resection, either segmental or total, led to improvement or resolution of symptoms in the majority of patients who failed cecostomy. However, this is a complex and heterogeneous group and some patients will have continued issues.

The impact of transcutaneous electrical stimulation therapy on appendicostomy operation rates for children with chronic constipation--a single-institution experience.

PURPOSE: Appendicostomy for antegrade continence enema is a minimally invasive surgical intervention that has helped many children with chronic constipation. At our institution, since 2006, transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) has been trialed to treat slow-transit constipation (STC) in children. This retrospective audit aimed to determine if TES use affected appendicostomy-formation rates and to monitor changes in practice. We hypothesized that appendicostomy rates have decreased for STC but not for other indications. METHODS: Appendicostomy-formation rate was determined for the 5 years before and after 2006. Children were identified as STC or non-STC from nuclear transit scintigraphy and patient records. RESULTS: Since 1999, 317 children were diagnosed with STC using nuclear transit scintigraphy with 121 during 2001 to 2005 (24.2/year) and 147 during 2006 to 2010 (29.4/year). Seventy-four children had appendicostomy formation. For 2001 to 2005, appendicostomy-formation rates for STC and non-STC children were similar: 5.4 per year (n = 27) and 4.8 per year (n = 24), respectively. For 2006 to 2010, appendicostomy-formation rates were 1.2 per year (n = 6) for STC and 3.2 per year (n = 16) for non-STC (χ(2), P = .04). CONCLUSION: Since 2006, appendicostomy-formation rates have significantly reduced in STC but not in non-STC children at our institute, coinciding with the introduction of TES as an alternative treatment for STC. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation has not been tested on non-STC children in this period.

Colonoscopy: why are general surgeons being excluded?

BACKGROUND: The role of surgeons as endoscopists has been extensively debated in the literature, with conflicting studies published regarding the safety and efficacy of surgeons performing colonoscopies. A multitude of medical federations and societies have set various standards for granting endoscopy privileges, many with a bias against general surgeons [1, 3]. We reviewed the colonoscopy experience at our institution to evaluate differences between gastroenterologists (GI) and general (GS) and colorectal surgeons (CRS) in procedure times and complication and cecal intubation rates. METHODS: Between January 2000 and July 2002, 5237 colonoscopies were performed at our institution. The data for procedure times, completion, and complication rates were collected in a prospective database. Complications were defined as perforation, bleeding, and postpolypectomy syndrome. Incomplete colonoscopies due to colitis, poor bowel preparation, or tumor obstruction were excluded. Chi-squared test was used to compare complication and cecal intubation rates between the three groups. Median procedure times were compared using the Kruskall-Wallis and Dunn's pairwise tests. A significant p-value was defined as <0.05. RESULTS: No differences in the complication rate was noted between the three groups: GI (0.12%), CRS (0.15%), and GS (0.11%) ( p = 0.99). There was a trend toward a lower incomplete colonoscopy rate in the GS group compared to CRS and GI: 0.32% vs 0.84% and 0.36%, respectively ( p = 0.07). The median colonoscopy times for GS (29 min), however, were shorter than for GI (34 min, p < 0.001) or CRS (31 min, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: General surgeons perform colonoscopies expeditiously, with as low a morbidity rate and as high a completion rate as their gastroenterology or colorectal surgery colleagues. As the results of this study confirm, general surgeons should not be excluded from endoscopy suites.

Tube caecostomies--a fresh look in paediatric practice.

We have evaluated our practice of tube caecostomies in 21 children operated on from January 1982 to December 1987 at the Royal Hospital for sick children, Bristol, and 18 children operated on at the Paediatric Surgery Unit of the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana from January 1989 to December 1996. The indications for surgery were, Hirschsprung's disease (36) and idiopathic constipation (3). The definitive procedures involved were Duhamel's procedure in 36, Soave's procedure in 2 and colo-anal anastomosis in 1 case. This method reduces the total number of surgical operations required by the child from 3 to 2, thereby reducing the total period of hospitalisation for the child. A sample technique of tube caecostomy is described in 39 children undergoing corrective surgery.

The value of the MACE (Malone antegrade colonic enema) procedure in adult patients.

BACKGROUND: We report our experience with the Malone antegrade colonic enema (MACE) procedure in adult patients suffering from urinary incontinence and intractable constipation with or without fecal soiling. STUDY DESIGN: Since June 1990, the MACE procedure was initiated in 4 female and 12 male patients 14-54 years old (mean age, 29.9 years) with different pathologic conditions (myelodysplasia, n = 7; anorectal anomaly, n = 3; spinal cord lesion, n = 4; neuropathic disease of unclear cause, n = 2). Three surgical techniques were used: reversed and in situ appendix and tapered ileum). Complex simultaneous urologic continence procedures were performed in nine patients. Two patients had undergone previous operations in the lower urinary tract. RESULTS: After 6.6 years of followup (average, 41.7 months), eight patients (50%) were still using the MACE successfully. They were completely clean day and night and were relieved of symptoms of constipation. Eleven complications related to the MACE procedure occurred in seven patients (44%). Eight patients abandoned the procedure for various reasons. The failure rate was higher in chronically constipated patients without fecal soiling. CONCLUSIONS: The MACE procedure is associated with a high failure rate when used in adults, but it may be possible to identify a subgroup of patients in whom the procedure could be beneficial. Success would depend on overcoming technical problems and difficulties with patient compliance.

Cecostomia ampliada: como alternativa para cirugia de colon en un solo tiempo / Widened cecostomy: an alternative to one time colon surgery

Se presenta un trabajo prospectivo, sobre el cecostoma ampliado, como una alternativa para cirugia de colon en un solo tiempo. Se realizaron en total 45 cecostomias ampliadas en el Instituto gastroenterologico de Cochabamba, entre julio de 1988 a enero de 1996, de los cuales fueron 28 varones 62,2 por ciento y 17 mujeres 37,8 por ciento iben las indicaciones, la tecnica quirurgica, el manejo y la morbimortalidad. De los 45 pacientes, en 13 casos 28,9 por ciento no se preparo colon, en 27 casos 60 por ciento estaban mal preparados y en 5 casos 11,1 por ciento existian dudas sobre la anastomosis. Siendo la morbilidad del 22,2 por ciento con 10 casos y la mortalidad fue del 2,2 por ciento con un caso. Tampoco se realizo el seguimiento por diversas causas. Finalmente analizando los resultados de este trabajo, consideramos que el cecostoma ampliado mas el manejo a demanda del tubo de cecostomia, es una buena alternativa para la cirugia de colon en un solo tiempo, tanto para patologia benigna como maligna, con colon no preparado, mal preparado o cuando existen dudas sobre las anastomosis realizadas. Ademas este procedimiento ahorra tiempo, es mas economico porque no requiere de otra cirugia adicional.

Vólvulo de ciego: informe de dos pacientes / Volvulus of the cecum

Se presentan dos casos de vólvulo del ciego, tratados en el Sevicio de Cirugía General del Hospital Juárez de México, uno de 55 años de edad y el otro de 83. El primero sin ningún antecedente de importancia; cuyo cuadro clínico fue de bloqueo intestinal bajo no complicado. Las placas simples de abdomen mostraron gran dilatación a nivel del ciego así como de asas intestinales; en el colon por enema, el bario se detuvo a nivel del ángulo hepático, y se hizo más aparente la dilatación del ciego con niveles hidroaéreos. En el transoperatorio se confirmó vólvulo del ciego con una gran dilatación, se "destuerce" y se llevó a cabo cecopexia con cecostomía. En un seguimiento durante 5 años se encuentra asintomático. El segundo presentó como antecedente hernia inguinal izquierda de 20 años de evolución. Su cuadro clínico fue de bloqueo ntestinal bajo. Las placas simples de abdomen mostraron distensión de colon sigmoideo, "Imagen sugestiva de pico de ave", y en colon ascendente distensión con niveles hidroaéreos. Se llevó a cigía con diagnóstico de vólvulo de sigmoides y hernia inguinal izquierda encarcelad; en el transoperatorio se encontró vólvulo del ciego de 15 cm, hernia inguinal izquierda por deslizamiento, que contenía sigmoides distendido. Se "destuerce" el ciego y se realizó cecopexia, así como plastia inguinal. El paciente falleció a las 24 horas por broncoaspiración. Conclusión. el tratamientio que demuestra buenos resultados cuando el ciego es viable es la cecopexia, cecostomía o ambas a la vez. Cuando el ciego muestra necrosis, la conducta es la resección (Hemicolectomía), con iliotransversoanastomosis primaria si no existe perforación, o bien ileostomía, más técnica de Hartman con el colon distal cuando está presente