Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 3.168
Filtrar
1.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 33(6): e5793, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38783553

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of rescheduling hydrocodone combination products (HCPs) from schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act to the more restrictive schedule II on unintentional pediatric exposures (≤5 years old). METHODS: Using U.S. data on outpatient retail pharmacy dispensing, emergency department (ED) visits, and poison center (PC) exposure cases, we assessed trends in prescriptions dispensed and unintentional pediatric exposure cases involving hydrocodone (rescheduled from III to II) compared to oxycodone (schedule II) and codeine (schedule III for combination products) using descriptive and interrupted time-series (ITS) analyses during the 16 quarters before and after the October 2014 rescheduling of HCPs. RESULTS: Dispensing of hydrocodone products was declining before rescheduling but declined more steeply post-rescheduling. In ITS analyses, both hydrocodone and oxycodone had significant slope decreases in PC case rates in the post versus pre-period that was larger for hydrocodone, while codeine had a small but significant slope increase in PC case rates. An estimated 4202 ED visits for pediatric hydrocodone exposures occurred in the pre-period and 2090 visits occurred in the post-period, a significant decrease of 50.3%. Oxycodone exposures showed no significant decrease. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric hydrocodone unintentional exposure ED visits and PC cases decreased after HCP rescheduling more than would be expected had the pre-rescheduling trend continued; the acceleration in the decrease in hydrocodone PC cases was partially offset by a slowing in the decrease in codeine-involved cases. The trend changes were likely due to multiple factors, including changes in dispensing that followed the rescheduling. Unintentional pediatric medication exposures and poisonings remain a public health concern requiring ongoing, multifaceted mitigation efforts.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Codeína , Control de Medicamentos y Narcóticos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Hidrocodona , Oxicodona , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Preescolar , Oxicodona/efectos adversos , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Control de Medicamentos y Narcóticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Lactante , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Niño , Combinación de Medicamentos
2.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 62(3): 174-182, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38683030

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Despite known contraindications, benzodiazepines are frequently prescribed for older adults. This study utilizes poison control center data on benzodiazepine-involved cases aged 50 and above to compare the characteristics of suspected suicide attempt with other intentional misuse cases. We also examined associations of major medical outcomes (major effect/death) with demographic characteristics and other co-used substances in each group. METHODS: The study employed data from the America's Poison Center National Poison Data System from 2015-2022. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression models were used. RESULTS: Of the benzodiazepine-poisoning cases of intentional misuse (n = 93,245), 85 percent were suicide attempts and 15 percent were other intentional misuses. Reports to poisons centers showed a decline from 2019-2022 when compared to 2015-2016. However, the likelihood of a reported suicide attempt, compared to other intentional misuse, was greater in 2019-2022 compared to 2015-2016 and among those who co-used antidepressants, anxiolytics, atypical antipsychotics, other benzodiazepines, other analgesics, anticonvulsants, and alcohol. The odds of major effect/death in both groups were also greater in 2019-2022, with suicide attempt cases in advanced ages showing higher odds. The co-use of antidepressants, prescription opioids, atypical antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, and other analgesics were associated with a higher likelihood of major effect/death in both exposure groups. For instance, adjusted odds ratios for co-used prescription opioids were 2.20 (95 percent confidence intervals: 2.09-2.31) among suicide attempt cases and 3.51 (95 percent confidence intervals: 3.10-3.97) among other intentional misuse cases. DISCUSSION: Healthcare providers need to screen for suicidal ideation among benzodiazepine users, with special attention to an increased risk of suicide attempt among those who co-use antidepressants and opioids and to decreasing adverse outcomes in all misuse cases. Assessments of underlying mental health and substance use problems and medication regimens to minimize polypharmacy and drug interactions are needed to reduce adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Though the numbers of benzodiazepine-involved suicide attempt and other intentional misuse cases reported to United States poison centers decreased in recent years, the likelihood of major medical effect/death among these cases have increased.


Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones , Intento de Suicidio , Humanos , Benzodiazepinas/envenenamiento , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intento de Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Sobredosis de Droga/epidemiología , Intoxicación/epidemiología
4.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 62(3): 183-189, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38587109

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Mental health problems among youth have escalated over the past decade, with increased rates of self-harm, including suicide attempts by ingestion. Social media use has been linked to youth mental health, including "challenges" urging youth to ingest substances for recreational and other purposes. We hypothesized that social media challenges for particular substances would temporally correspond with increased ingestions of these substances. METHODS: We identified peak Google Trends search times for social media ingestion challenges involving diphenhydramine, laundry pods, nutmeg, and cinnamon, and used data from America's Poison Centers National Poison Data System to plot reported ingestions 3 months before and after peak searches in school-aged children. RESULTS: There were 2,169 individuals in the analysis. Diphenhydramine was the most frequently reported ingestion for misuse/abuse and suicidal purposes (n = 266 and 1,609, respectively). For all ingestions together, 45 percent (n = 979) had a moderate health effect, and 6.35 percent (n = 137) had a major health effect. Time of peak searches corresponded with increased ingestions for each substance. DISCUSSION: We found a temporal relationship between peak Google Trends searches for ingestion challenges and ingestions of that substance reported to United States poison centers. Compared to misuse/abuse ingestions, most suicidal ingestions peaked 1-2 months later, suggesting a public health opportunity for intervention. LIMITATIONS: This retrospective observational study does not establish causal effect. All data are a result of self-reporting of the exposures, which may lead to a reporting bias. Google Trends is not the only search engine and likely underestimates the true incidence of social media posts. CONCLUSIONS: Additional research is needed on the relationship between social media and youth mental health, particularly around "challenges" that place youths' health at risk. There may be opportunities for intervention to decrease medical and mental health sequelae of these challenges.


Asunto(s)
Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Humanos , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Adolescente , Masculino , Femenino , Intento de Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Difenhidramina/envenenamiento
5.
S Afr Fam Pract (2004) ; 66(1): e1-e5, 2024 Feb 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38572878

RESUMEN

The impact of poisoning can differ significantly depending on the specific substance consumed. Identifying toxic substances in a patient is crucial to obtaining a thorough medical history. Frontline healthcare providers in the emergency department often handle patients presenting with poisoning. Their clinical presentation can vary depending on their dose, duration of exposure, and pre-existing medical conditions. Initially, poisoning management entails administering supportive care such as absorption and enhancing the elimination of poison with charcoal and antidote administration after identifying the poisoning substances. This article aims to provide a basic overview of the concepts involved in evaluating and managing these individuals.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones , Humanos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Antídotos/uso terapéutico , Carbón Orgánico/uso terapéutico
6.
Toxicon ; 242: 107704, 2024 May 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38565396

RESUMEN

Members of the genus Protobothrops are amongst the more than twenty-eight range-restricted Indian pit viper species. Their bites and envenomings are rarely documented from India. Pit viper envenomings can be challenging to treat in the Indian setting, since available antivenoms do not satisfactorily neutralize their venoms. Herein, we present the first Indian reports on bites and envenoming by Protobothrops jerdonii and Protobothrops himalayanus resulting in local effects, coagulopathy and acute kidney injury in the case of the former and possible mild, isolated coagulopathy in the case of the latter; and discuss management-related challenges in the context of absent specific antivenoms.


Asunto(s)
Antivenenos , Venenos de Crotálidos , Crotalinae , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones , Mordeduras de Serpientes , Mordeduras de Serpientes/terapia , India , Animales , Humanos , Antivenenos/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Adulto , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad
7.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 62(3): 190-196, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38501499

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Self-medication is the use of drugs to treat self-diagnosed illnesses or symptoms, on one's own initiative, without the guidance of a healthcare professional. Poison centers play an important role in understanding the relationship between self-medication and poisoning. The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical and epidemiological profile of patients exposed to and/or poisoned by different drugs through self-medication. METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional, and descriptive study analyzed data from 2014 to 2020, provided by the Toxicological Information and Assistance Center of Santa Catarina, Brazil. Data were selected, tabulated, and analyzed by using descriptive statistics and group comparison with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were 683 cases of self-medication identified. Most patients were female (62.8 percent) and between 20 and 29 years old (26.1 percent). A toxic dose of a substance was administered in only 22.8 percent of the cases, and five deaths were recorded. The most commonly used medications were anxiolytics (18 percent), followed by analgesics and antipyretics (15.4 percent). Paracetamol was the drug used in three of the five cases that resulted in deaths. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates the prevalence of self-medication among women aged between 20 and 29 years old. Statistical analysis failed to show a relationship between a toxic dose and clinical manifestations. Anxiolytics, analgesics, and antipyretics are the most reported medications probably because healthcare professionals are mostly the ones who contact the center. Analgesics and antipyretics account for more than fifty percent of the deaths caused by self-medication in the present report. Some limitations such as secondary sources are related. CONCLUSION: We highlight the importance of health professionals in promoting the rational use of medicines, as well as poison centers in assisting the population and raising their awareness regarding the issue.


Asunto(s)
Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones , Intoxicación , Automedicación , Humanos , Brasil/epidemiología , Automedicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Adulto Joven , Intoxicación/epidemiología , Intoxicación/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Lactante , Anciano , Analgésicos/envenenamiento
8.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 62(3): 168-173, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38525870

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Orphenadrine overdoses can cause antimuscarinic toxicity, respiratory failure, refractory seizures and cardiotoxicity. The dose-toxicity relationship is poorly defined. Orphenadrine is marketed as immediate and sustained release formulations, and it is not known how the formulation impacts on toxicity. We determined the clinical toxicity of orphenadrine in patients referred to a regional poisons centre. METHODS: Retrospective case series of patients in New South Wales with orphenadrine deliberate self-poisoning from January 2016 to April 2022 referred to the New South Wales Poisons Information Centre. Demographics, history of exposure, treatment and outcomes were extracted from clinical databases. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were constructed to determine thresholds predicting toxicity. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were identified, with information on clinical outcomes in 46 patients and doses in 41 patients. All patients were older than 12 years. The median orphenadrine dose was 770 mg (range 210-10,000 mg), 59 per cent as the immediate release formulation, and 67 per cent reported coingestants. Doses of sustained release formulations were significantly greater than immediate release formulations, median 2,750 mg versus 595 mg. Common clinical features were drowsiness (59 per cent), sinus tachycardia (37 per cent) and confusion (33 per cent). Three patients had mild hypotension, three were intubated for coma, and two had seizures; no patients suffered ventricular dysrhythmias. All patients survived, with 75 per cent being medically cleared within 24 hours of presentation. A dose-toxicity relationship was observed, but conclusions are limited by the small number of cases with moderate or severe toxicity. DISCUSSION: All patients survived, and severe cardiac and neurological toxicity were not observed. This contrasts to published case reports noting severe poisoning at similar or lower doses. Formulation may have an impact on outcomes, with lesser toxicity from sustained release products. CONCLUSIONS: Orphenadrine doses up to 10 g were associated with antimuscarinic toxicity and sedation, but not severe cardiotoxicity. More research exploring the effect of dose and formulation on outcomes is required.


Asunto(s)
Sobredosis de Droga , Orfenadrina , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Orfenadrina/envenenamiento , Intento de Suicidio , Niño , Nueva Gales del Sur , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/envenenamiento , Anciano , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga
9.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 62(2): 112-119, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38426845

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Hexahydrocannabinol is a hexahydro derivative of cannabinol. Poisoning with hexahydrocannabinol was first observed in Europe in May 2022. METHOD: This is a retrospective observational study of cases of self-reported hexahydrocannabinol exposure reported to French poison centres between 1 January 2022 and 31 May 2023. RESULTS: There were 37 cases, including 19 in May 2023. The median age of the patients was 36 (interquartile range 28-43) years, and most were men. Eight patients had a history of substance use disorder. The route of exposure was ingestion in 24, inhalation (smoking or vaping) in 10, inhalation and ingestion in two and sublingual in one. Clinical features were neurological (85 per cent), cardiovascular (61 per cent), gastrointestinal (33 per cent), psychiatric (27 per cent) and ocular (21 per cent). Fifty-nine per cent of the patients were hospitalized. In four patients, the Poisoning Severity Score was 0 (asymptomatic); in 15 patients, the Score was 1 (minor); in 16, the Score was 2 (moderate); and in two cases, the Score was 3 (severe). In 70 per cent of patients, the outcome was known, and all recovered. Testing of biological samples was only undertaken in six cases. Five patients had positive blood or urine tests for hexahydrocannabinol; in two patients, tetrahydrocannabinol and metabolites were also detected. In addition, there was an additional patient in whom Δ8- and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol was detected in the substances used. DISCUSSION: Clinical effects reported in this series included neuropsychiatric and somatic effects. Whilst these cases related to self-reported hexahydrocannabinol use, it is likely that tetrahydrocannabinol use also contributed to the effects in a substantial proportion of cases. This study has some limitations, such as the lack of available information due to the retrospective nature of the study. As a result, it probably overestimates the number of moderate and severe cases due to under-reporting of cases of little or no severity. Analysis of the patient's blood and urine was performed only in six patients, so we cannot be certain that the products consumed by the other patients were hexahydrocannabinol. CONCLUSION: The clinical effects attributed to hexahydrocannabinol were neurological, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, psychiatric and ocular predominantly and were sometimes serious.


Asunto(s)
Intoxicación , Venenos , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Femenino , Dronabinol , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones , Europa (Continente)
10.
Toxicology ; 503: 153755, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38367941

RESUMEN

The attempt to define toxicovigilance can be based on defining its fundamental principles: prevention of infections with toxic substances, collecting information on poisonings, both in terms of their sources and side effects, and confirming poisonings, with the aim of improving treatment. Substances referred to include both those originating from animal bites, ingested inadvertently, and those resulting from environmental poisoning in industrial regions of countries, etc. In this review, we provide information about the crucial function of poison control centres in toxicovigilance, the importance of incorporating big data analytics and artificial intelligence to streamline toxicovigilance processes, and examples of toxicovigilance in different countries. In conclusion, we will present the direction that modern toxicovigilance should take, incorporating available artificial intelligence methods to maximise efficiency.


Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones , Animales , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo
11.
Wilderness Environ Med ; 35(1): 22-29, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38379483

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Aquatic envenomations are common injuries along the coastal United States that pose a public health risk and can cause significant morbidity. We examined aquatic envenomation exposures that were called in to poison control centers (PCC) in the United States from 2011 to 2020. METHODS: The Association of Poison Control Center's (AAPCC) National Poison Data System was queried for all aquatic envenomations reported during the 10 y period from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2020. Data collected included date, exposure and geographic location, patient age and sex, signs and symptoms, management setting, treatments, and clinical outcome. Duplicated records, confirmed nonexposure, and reports not originating within the United States were excluded. RESULTS: There were 8517 human aquatic envenomations reported during the study period, 62% (5243) of whom were male; 56% (4264) of patients were 30 y or younger. There were an average of 852 calls per year, with 46% of calls occurring during June to August. California, Texas, and Florida had the highest number of envenomations during the study period. Fish (61%; 5159) and Cnidaria (30%; 2519) envenomations were the most common exposures. Overall, 37% (3151) of exposures were treated in healthcare facilities, with no deaths reported. CONCLUSIONS: The highest proportion of aquatic envenomations occurred among younger males (≤30 y) during the summer months. While rarely leading to major adverse events, aquatic envenomations were commonly reported injuries to PCC and occurred in all 50 states. Poison control centers continue to be real-time sources of information and data regarding aquatic envenomation trends.


Asunto(s)
Cnidarios , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones , Animales , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Florida , Estaciones del Año , Texas
12.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 33(2): e5767, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38357800

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Medication poisoning is the most common method of self-harm. Longitudinal studies incorporating pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic data are required to describe the phenomenon and to evaluate the long-term impact on mental health. METHODS: Calls to the Poison Control Center of Policlinico Umberto I Hospital - Sapienza University of Rome, Italy, were analyzed retrospectively for characteristics and clinical presentation of cases of interest from January 2018 to December 2022. RESULTS: A total of 756 cases of self-harm by medication poisonings were recorded in the study period. A reduction in rate of cases in 2020 was followed by a return to pre-pandemic levels by 2021. When separately analyzing single- and multi-agent cases, occurrence of cases involving just one medication increased since early 2021, with a peak in 2022 (7.8% of total calls, 95% CI 6.2-9.5, from 4.9%, 95% CI 4.1-5.8 in 2018). This increase in the rate of cases, mostly of none or mild severity, was driven by youth aged 12-21, in which the relative proportion of single- versus multi-agent cases showed an increasing trend since 2020 (from 42.6% in 2018 to 78.6% in 2022). Acetaminophen was the medication most frequently involved and benzodiazepines the largest class. A psychiatric background was increasingly seen in 2022, especially in age group 12-21. CONCLUSION: Single-agent medication self-harm may be an increasingly prevailing phenomenon. Young adolescents with a psychiatric background might be most vulnerable to this behavior in the COVID-19 pandemic aftermath. Healthcare professionals should expect favorable clinical outcome and improve both counseling and psychotherapy supervision in individuals at risk.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Intoxicación , Conducta Autodestructiva , Adolescente , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones , Pandemias , Conducta Autodestructiva/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Intoxicación/epidemiología , Intoxicación/terapia
13.
J Adolesc Health ; 74(5): 1053-1056, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38416101

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We describe trends in psilocybin exposures among adolescents and young adults as reported to US poison centers over the past decade. METHODS: We queried the National Poison Data System for cases involving psilocybin during January 1, 2013-December 31, 2022. Persons aged 13-25 years were included. We examined exposures to psilocybin by demographics, clinical effects, level of care, and medical outcome. RESULTS: During the 10-year study period, 4,055 psilocybin-involved exposures were reported among adolescents and young adults, 2,667 (65.8%) being single substance exposures. Most single substance cases received medical attention (adolescents: 75.3% [n = 1,176], young adults: 72.1% [n = 797]). We did not find significant change in the number of cases during 2013-2018. Cases started increasing in 2019. In 2022, cases more than tripled among adolescents and more than doubled among young adults, compared to 2018 (p < .0001). DISCUSSION: Continued national surveillance is critical to determine the impact of psilocybin exposures on youth as it becomes increasingly available.


Asunto(s)
Venenos , Psilocibina , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones , Bases de Datos Factuales
14.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 62(2): 107-111, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38416057

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Ammonia solution (ammonium hydroxide) is used to convert cocaine hydrochloride to freebase cocaine. Due to its causticity, unintentional exposure to ammonia in a substance use context can result in injury. The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics of unintentional oral and buccal ammonia solution exposure in a substance use context. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using the French poison centres database over a 10-year period (2009-2018). RESULTS: A total of 1,546 files were extracted, and 263 substance users were included. There was a significant increase in the number of these exposures between 2009 and 2018. Unintentional ingestion of ammonia solution was linked to product decanting in 89 per cent of cases. Substance use prior to the exposure and a festive context, such as free parties or teknivals, were identified in 25 per cent and 21 per cent of cases, respectively. Patients received a hospital examination in 87 per cent of cases. The severity of intoxication in substance users was graded as moderate (33 per cent) or severe (15 per cent) using the Poisoning Severity Score. DISCUSSION: The increased number of ammonia solution cases reported was consistent with an increase in the number of crack users in Europe in the same period. Ammonia solution exposure can suggest the possibility of substance use disorders. In such cases, patients can be referred to receive appropriate treatment and support. This study had some limitations, such as the lack of available information due to the retrospective nature of the study and the non-standardized questions asked by the poison centre during the medical phone interviews. CONCLUSION: Oral and buccal ammonia solution exposure in known substance users in France increased between 2009 and 2018. These users were mostly young men. A festive context and decanting were frequent. Patients were mainly referred to emergency departments to receive clinical examination and care. The potential severity of oral or buccal ammonia solution exposure in substance users requires increased vigilance among all healthcare professionals involved in the management of these intoxication cases.


Asunto(s)
Cocaína , Intoxicación , Venenos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Masculino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Amoníaco , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Intoxicación/terapia
15.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 26(3): 281-288, 2024 02 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37422917

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Exposure to e-cigarette liquids, whether intentional or accidental, might lead to adverse events. This study aimed to describe the prevalence and characteristics of exposures to e-liquids reported to French Poison Control Centers. METHODS: All e-liquids exposure cases reported to French Poison Control Centers from July 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020, were reviewed. Information was collected about the patient's characteristics, exposure circumstances, management and outcome. RESULTS: About 919 cases of exposure to e-liquids were reported. Ages ranged from one month to 89 years, with a mean age of 16.6 ± 18.6 years and a median age of 4 years. The highest number of exposures-50.7%-concerned infants (0-4 years), 3.1% children (5-11 years), 5.9% adolescents (12-17 years), and 40.1% of cases concerned adults. The majority of cases were accidental (95.0%). Intentional exposures (4.9%) were mainly observed in patients older than 12 years of age (P < 0.001). The route of exposure was ingestion in 73.7% of the cases. A total of 455 exposures showed no symptoms or signs related to poisoning. High nicotine concentration in e-liquids was associated with an increase in hospital management (Odds-ratio from 1.77 to 2.60). CONCLUSION: Involuntary exposures to e-liquids occurred more often in children under the age of five, mainly by ingestion. Unlike intentional ingestions, unintentional ingestions rarely resulted in severe adverse events. These findings highlight the importance of ongoing surveillance to prevent such exposures and associated injuries, emphasizing the need for effective regulation of these products.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina , Vapeo , Niño , Adulto , Lactante , Adolescente , Humanos , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones , Nicotina/efectos adversos
18.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 90(3): 812-818, 2024 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37953463

RESUMEN

AIMS: Lacosamide is a third-generation antiepileptic drug used as adjunctive therapy for partial seizures. Since its approval in 2008 very few cases of lacosamide overdose have been described in literature. The aim of our study was to evaluate clinical characteristics of acute lacosamide poisoning. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed including all cases of acute lacosamide poisoning referred to Pavia Poison Control Centre from January 2012 to December 2021. For each patient age, sex, ingested dose, coingestants, clinical manifestations, treatment and outcome were collected. RESULTS: A total of 31 subjects (median age 39 years, [interquartile range: 26.5-46.5]; females 22/31) were included. The median lacosamide ingested dose was 1500 mg [650-2800]. In 35.5% of cases lacosamide was the single ingested substance, while in 64.5% coingestants were also present. Coingestants varied from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 3, with the more common being benzodiazepines and valproic acid. Clinical manifestations were present in 87% patients the most common were: vomiting (29%); seizures (29%), coma (25.8%), drowsiness (25.8%), confusion (12.9%), agitation (12.9%), tachycardia (12.9%), tremors (9.7%), bradycardia (9.7%), headache (6.5%) and hypertension (3.2%). The median lacosamide ingested dose was significantly higher in patients that experienced coma compared to patient who did not (2800 vs. 800 mg; P = .0082). Orotracheal intubation was necessary in 32.3% of patients. All patients fully recovered. CONCLUSION: Lacosamide acute overdose may lead to a severe clinical picture. Dentral nervous system symptoms predominated, particularly seizures and coma occurred in a high percentage of cases.


Asunto(s)
Sobredosis de Droga , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Coma/inducido químicamente , Coma/tratamiento farmacológico , Sobredosis de Droga/terapia , Sobredosis de Droga/tratamiento farmacológico , Lacosamida/uso terapéutico , Convulsiones/inducido químicamente , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos
20.
Public Health Rep ; 139(1): 112-119, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37933467

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic led to widespread fear of infection, with many people expanding their use of cleaning products and trying unproven prevention and treatment strategies. We described shifts in reported exposures related to COVID-19 home interventions. METHODS: This study considered suspected toxicity exposures involving household cleaning products (bleach, peroxide, disinfectants), antimalarials (hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine), and ivermectin reported to the California Poison Control System from 2015 through 2021 and assessed trends in exposures by using interrupted time-series analyses. RESULTS: We found a significant increase in exposures reported to the California Poison Control System related to household cleaning products and ivermectin during the COVID-19 pandemic. As of January 1, 2015, the baseline level of reported exposures to household cleaning products was 707.33 per month and was declining at a rate of 1.71 (95% CI, -2.87 to -0.56) per month through February 29, 2020. In March 2020, an increase of 466.57 (95% CI, 328.08-605.07) reported exposures above baseline occurred, after which exposures to cleaning products decreased at a rate of 23.40 (95% CI, -32.48 to -14.32) per month. The number of reported exposures to antimalarials did not change significantly before or during the pandemic. The number of reported ivermectin exposures before December 2020 was initially stable at 14.50 per month and then increased by 2.05 per month through December 2021. CONCLUSIONS: Our observations suggest that while some dangerous home prevention and treatment efforts resolve over time, further interventions may be needed to reduce the public health effects related to attempts to self-treat COVID-19 with ivermectin.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos , COVID-19 , Desinfectantes , Venenos , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Ivermectina , Pandemias/prevención & control , Peróxidos , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones , California/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA