Repeatability and reproducibility of a new method for centration analysis via optical zone tangent points after corneal refractive surgery.

PURPOSE: To investigate the repeatability and reproducibility of a new method for centration analysis after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK). METHODS: This study comprised 29 eyes treated with SMILE and 24 with FS-LASIK. Decentrations were analyzed using tangential and pachymetry difference maps respectively. Both difference maps were generated with a Scheimpflug tomographer (Pentacam) for each eye, using preoperative and 3-month postoperative scans. Repeatability and reproducibility were evaluated by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), within-subject standard deviation (Sw), and coefficient of repeatability (CR). RESULTS: ICC, Sw, and CR showed good to excellent repeatability in locating the coordinates of the optical zone (OZ) center on both maps, with values ranging from 0.84 to 0.96, 0.03 to 0.13, and 0.08 to 0.36 respectively. The repeatability of the total decentration from the preoperative corneal vertex on the tangential curvature difference maps( d TC ) and the pachymetry difference maps( d PC ) were moderate and good, respectively. The ICC, Sw, and CR of d TC were 0.63, 0.09, and 0.25, respectively. The ICC, Sw, and CR of d PC were 0.77, 0.10, and 0.28, respectively. The reproducibility of the OZ center measurements was excellent for the tangential difference maps (ICC ≥ 0.97 ) and good for the pachymetry difference maps (ICC ≥ 0.86). ICC, Sw, and CR showed excellent reproducibility of d TC , with values of 0.95, 0.03, and 0.08, respectively. ICC, Sw, and CR showed good reproducibility of d PC , with values of 0.89, 0.06, and 0.17, respectively. CONCLUSION: The centration analysis method used in this study showed good to excellent repeatability and reproducibility in locating the coordinates of the center of the OZ on the tangential and pachymetry difference maps.

Comparison of Objective Visual Quality Following SMILE and SmartPulse Technology-Assisted TransPRK at a 1,050-Hz Ablation Frequency for Moderate-to-High Myopia.

PURPOSE: To compare the objective visual quality of moderate-to-high myopia corrected by small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) at a 1,050-Hz ablation frequency, assisted by Smart-Pulse technology (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions). METHODS: This study involved 123 patients (123 eyes) with moderate-to-high myopia between July 2020 and January 2021. They were categorized into the SMILE group (67 patients, 67 eyes) and the TransPRK group (56 patients, 56 eyes). Follow-ups were conducted at 6 months postoperatively to record the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity, and the Strehl ratio and higher order aberrations were measured using the Sirius anterior segment analysis device (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions) under a 6-mm pupil diameter at various postoperative intervals. RESULTS: At 1 week and 1 month postoperatively, the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) in the SMILE group was superior to that in the TransPRK group (P < .05 for both). At 1 week and 1 month postoperatively, the Strehl ratio value in the SMILE group was higher than that in the TransPRK group (P < .05 for both). At 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, coma was greater in the SMILE group than in the TransPRK group (P < .05 for all). Spherical aberrations were lower in the SMILE group than in the TransPRK group at 3 and 6 months postoperatively (P < .05). At 6 months postoperatively, UDVA was -0.09 ± 0.08 and -0.11 ± 0.05 logMAR in the SMILE and TransPRK groups, respectively, which exceeded their preoperative corrected distance visual acuity of -0.05 ± 0.04 and -0.09 ± 0.08 logMAR (all P < .001). Compared with preoperative values, the Strehl ratio, total higher order, coma, and spherical aberration differences were significantly increased postoperatively in both groups (all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Both surgical methods improved UDVA and each had its advantages. The visual quality of SMILE was superior at 1 week and 1 month postoperatively (Strehl ratio values were higher than those of the TransPRK group), and its spherical aberration was lower than that of the TransPRK group at 3 and 6 months; TransPRK with SmartPulse technology with a 1,050-Hz ablation frequency showed that coma was significantly lower than that of the SMILE group at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(7):e490-e498.].

Early elastic and viscoelastic corneal biomechanical changes after photorefractive keratectomy and small incision lenticule extraction.

PURPOSE: To compare early changes in the corneal biomechanical parameters after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and their correlations with corneal shape parameters. METHODS: One hundred twenty four eyes received myopic PRK and SMILE for similar amounts of myopia. Corneal tomography with Pentacam HR, biomechanical parameters using Corvis ST, and Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) were evaluated before and 2 weeks after surgery. The change in each parameter was compared between groups, while the difference in central corneal thickness and cornea-compensated intraocular pressure measured before and after surgery were considered as covariates. RESULTS: A significant reduction was seen in the corneal stiffness parameter at first applanation, and an increase in deformation amplitude ratio (DAR), and integrated inverse radius (IIR) in both groups after surgery (p < 0.001) Changes in DAR, and IIR were significantly greater in the SMILE than in the PRK group (p < 0.001) Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) decreased in both SMILE and PRK groups after surgery, (p < 0.001) with no statistically significant difference between groups (p > 0.05) Among new Corvis ST parameters, DAR showed a significant correlation with changes in Ambrosio relational thickness in both groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques caused significant changes in corneal biomechanics in the early postoperative period, with greater elastic changes in the SMILE group compared to the PRK group, likely due to lower tension in the SMILE cap and thinner residual stromal bed in SMILE. There were no differences in viscoelastic changes between them, so the lower CH may reflect the volume of tissue removed.

Three-year results of central corneal stromal thickness reduction in small-incision lenticule extraction for high myopia correction.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the long-term corneal stromal remodeling and central stromal thickness (CST) reduction accuracy after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for high myopia correction. METHODS: This prospective study included 30 patients (50 eyes) who had undergone SMILE. Measurements of CST reduction using optical coherence tomography were performed at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years after surgery. Correlations were performed between planned and achieved CST reductions. RESULTS: The study enrolled 50 eyes of 30 patients. The mean spherical equivalent was -9.25±1.52 D(diopters). The postoperative CST increased in the first month after surgery and remained stable for a year. Thereafter, it remained stable during follow-up from 1 to 3 years postoperatively. The predicted CST reduction was 146.4 ± 10.3 µm. The achieved CST reductions at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years after surgery were 135.3 ± 12.1 µm, 130.8 ± 10.6 µm, 125.9 ± 9.4 µm, and 122.2 ± 10.6 µm, respectively. An overestimation of CST reduction was observed three years after surgery. Correlation analysis revealed a strong correlation between planned and achieved CST reductions; however, no correlation was found between CST reductions predicted error and the planned CST reductions. CONCLUSION: During long-term follow-up, our findings revealed a significant stromal remodeling following SMILE in patients with high myopia. Therefore, clinicians should consider it when screening patients with high myopia for SMILE.

Longitudinal analysis of wound healing response post SMILE and LASIK surgery using proteomic profiling of tears.

Different types of refractive surgeries often exhibit differences in wound healing responses. The current study investigated post-operative tear protein profiles in subjects who underwent LASIK and SMILE to elucidate global changes to the proteomic profile during the period the patient cornea undergoes healing. In this study, 10 patients underwent LASIK and SMILE surgery with a contralateral paired eye design. Tear samples were collected using Schirmer's strips preoperatively, at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. Quantitative ITRAQ labeled proteomics was performed and the tear protein ratios were normalized to pre-operative protein levels for each subject. Whole proteomics identified 1345 proteins in tears from LASIK and 1584 proteins in SMILE across time points. About 67 proteins were common in LASIK and SMILE tears across all the time points. Wound healing responses were differentially regulated between two refractive surgeries (SMILE and LASIK). The proteins Ceruloplasmin, Clusterin, Serotransferrin were upregulated at 1 month and 3 months and downregulated at 6 months post operatively in LASIK surgery where as in SMILE these were downregulated. Galectin 3 binding protein showed upregulation at 1 month and the levels decreased at 3 months and 6 months postop in LASIK tears whereas the levels increased at 3 months and 6 months post-op in SMILE tears. The levels of proteins that protect from oxidative stress were higher in SMILE as compared to LASIK postoperatively. The extracellular matrix proteins showed an increase in expression at 6 months in SMILE tears and was stabilized at 6 months in LASIK tears post operatively. Different refractive surgeries induce distinct wound healing responses as identified in tears. This study has implications in targeting key proteins for improving the clinical outcome postrefractive surgery.

[Whether laser corneal refractive surgery combined with presbyopia correction technology could treat presbyopia].

Presbyopia refers to a phenomenon in which the ability of the eye to accommodate is insufficient to meet the daily demand for proximity due to age. In modern society, more and more patients over 40 years old want to solve visual problems caused by presbyopia and refractive errors, which poses new challenges for clinical laser corneal refractive surgery, and a variety of combined presbyopia correction technologies and programs have emerged. However, whether laser corneal refractive surgery combined with presbyopia correction technology could treat presbyopia deserves clinical attention. Based on the mechanism of laser corneal refractive surgery and various presbyopia correction techniques, this article deeply analyzes the purpose and effect of laser corneal refractive surgery combined with presbyopia correction technology. It is proposed that this surgical treatment could only play a role in correcting presbyopia at present and should be performed accordingly.

[Chinese expert consensus on the perioperative medication in laser corneal refractive surgery (2024)].

With the increasing incidence of myopia year by year and the continuous progress of various treatment techniques, laser corneal refractive surgery has become one of the important ways to correct refractive errors. The rational drug use in the perioperative period is important for the success of surgery and reduction of complications. In 2019, based on the development of laser corneal refractive surgery in China, experts from the Refractive Surgery Experts Group of Ocular Microcirculation Branch of Chinese Society of Microcirculation and the Ophthalmology Branch in the Chinese Medical Association formed the "Chinese Expert Consensus on the Perioperative Medication in Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery (2019)". To further promote the expansion of new clinical technologies and surgical methods, and to improve surgical efficacy, the Refractive Surgery Experts Group of Ocular Microcirculation Branch of Chinese Society of Microcirculation, according to the latest domestic and foreign research results, has recently updated the consensus after a collective discussion.

BCLA CLEAR Presbyopia: Management with corneal techniques.

Corneal techniques for enhancing near and intermediate vision to correct presbyopia include surgical and contact lens treatment modalities. Broad approaches used independently or in combination include correcting one eye for distant and the other for near or intermediate vision, (termed monovision or mini-monovision depending on the degree of anisometropia) and/or extending the eye's depth of focus [1]. This report reviews the evidence for the treatment profile, safety, and efficacy of the current range of corneal techniques for managing presbyopia. The visual needs and expectations of the patient, their ocular characteristics, and prior history of surgery are critical considerations for patient selection and preoperative evaluation. Contraindications to refractive surgery include unstable refraction, corneal abnormalities, inadequate corneal thickness for the proposed ablation depth, ocular and systemic co-morbidities, uncontrolled mental health issues and unrealistic patient expectations. Laser refractive options for monovision include surface/stromal ablation techniques and keratorefractive lenticule extraction. Alteration of spherical aberration and multifocal ablation profiles are the primary means for increasing ocular depth of focus, using surface and non-surface laser refractive techniques. Corneal inlays use either small aperture optics to increase depth of field or modify the anterior corneal curvature to induce corneal multifocality. In presbyopia correction by conductive keratoplasty, radiofrequency energy is applied to the mid-peripheral corneal stroma, leading to mid-peripheral corneal shrinkage and central corneal steepening. Hyperopic orthokeratology lens fitting can induce spherical aberration and correct some level of presbyopia. Postoperative management, and consideration of potential complications, varies according to technique applied and the time to restore corneal stability, but a minimum of 3 months of follow-up is recommended after corneal refractive procedures. Ongoing follow-up is important in orthokeratology and longer-term follow-up may be required in the event of late complications following corneal inlay surgery.

Total and simulated keratometry measurements using IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam AXL after small incision lenticule extraction.

PURPOSE: Calculating the intraocular lens (IOL) in patients after corneal refractive surgery presents a challenge. Because an overestimation of corneal power in cases undergone this surgery leading to a subsequent under-correction of IOL power. However, recent advancements in technology have eliable measurement of total corneal power. The aim of this research was to assess the agreement in simulated keratometry (SimK) and total keratometry (TK) values between IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam AXL. METHODS: The study involved 99 patients (99 eyes) undergone small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery. Each patient underwent scans using IOL Master 700 and Pentacam AXL. The following parameters were recorded: SimK1, SimK2, Total K1 (TK1), and Total K2 (TK2) for IOLMaster 700; and SimK1, SimK2, True Net Power (TNP) K1, TNPK2, Total Corneal Refractive Power (TCRP) K1, and TCRP K2 for Pentacam AXL. Agreement between the two devices was evaluated using Bland-Altman plot, while paired t-test was utilized to compare any differences in the same parameter by both instruments. RESULTS: The results revealed a strong correlation between the two devices.Noticeable comparability was identified for all SimK variables. However, there were noticeable differences in TK measurements as well as TK1-TNPK1, TK2-TNP K2, TK1-TCRP K1, and TK2-TCRP K2 parameters when comparing the two devices. The IOLMaster 700 consistently measured steeper values than the Pentacam AXL, with significant and clinically relevant differences of 1.34, 1.37, 0.87, and 0.95 diopters, respectively. CONCLUSION: While there was a noticeable correlation between the IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam AXL in SimK measurements, a marked difference was noted in TK values. The two devices cannot be used interchangeably when quantifying TK values.

Risk Factors for Re-treatment After Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction (KLEx) for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To identify potential risk factors that increase the likelihood of re-treatment following keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) for myopia and myopic astigmatism. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism who underwent KLEx using the VisuMax 500 laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec) between April 2015 and December 2020. Patients were assigned to one of two groups: the control group and the re-treatment group (if they had additional refractive surgery within 2 years of the primary treatment). The effect of different preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters on the re-treatment rate was analyzed. RESULTS: Overall 1,822 eyes of 938 patients were analyzed. In total, 2.96% of eyes (n = 54) underwent re-treatment. The re-treated patients were more likely to be women and have high myopia, high astigmatism, steep corneas, higher ocular residual astigmatism, and residual myopic and/or astigmatic refractive error. In contrast, no significant correlation was found between re-treatment rate and age, chord µ, type of astigmatism, and corneal thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with higher rates of retreatment after KLEx included female gender, manifest refractive high myopia (> -5.00 diopters [D]), astigmatism (> 2.00 D), spherical equivalent (> 6.00 D), ocular residual astigmatism, steeper corneas, and postoperative residual myopic and astigmatic refractive errors. This study may help to preoperatively detect patients at risk for re-treatment, improve preoperative patient counseling, and optimize patient selection to reduce future re-treatment rates. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(6):e362-e370.].

Comparison of visual outcomes and optical aberrations after SMILE with intraoperative Kappa angle adjustments between small and large Kappa angles.

This study compares postoperative visual outcomes and optical aberrations after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) in patients with both small (S-Kappa: Kappa angle < 0.2 mm) and large Kappa (L-Kappa: Kappa angle ≥ 0.2 mm) angles. The evaluated aberrations include total higher-order aberrations (HOAs), horizontal coma (HC), vertical coma (VC), and spherical aberrations (SA), with procedures incorporating intraoperative Kappa angle adjustments. We retrospectively analyzed patient records undergoing SMILE utilizing linear mixed models (LMM). We assessed adjusted mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), Strehl ratio (SR), total HOAs, VC, and SA at pupils of 3 mm and 6 mm for both S-Kappa and L-Kappa. The disparities between S-Kappa and L-Kappa were evaluated by LMM's adjusted mean differences. The differences in optical metrics were also assessed in eyes grouped by myopia levels: low, moderate, and high. A sensitivity analysis was conducted on a threshold of Kappa angle at 0.3 mm. Eight-five patients (169 eyes) were analyzed, and no significant pre-operative difference was found in UDVA (p = .222) or spherical equivalent (p = .433). Post-operative differences were found in SR at 3 mm pupil size (-0.06, p = .022), total HOA 3 mm (0.15, p = .022), HC 3 mm (0.04, p = .042), VC 3 mm and 6 mm (-0.08, p = .041; 0.04, p = .041). The stratified analysis for high myopia revealed significant differences in UDVA (-0.04, p = .037), HC 3 mm (0.07, p = .03), VC 6 mm (-0.21, p = .001), and SA 3 mm and 6 mm (0.07, p = .037; -0.09, p = .037). Sensitivity analysis showed no significant difference using a 0.3 mm Kappa threshold. While some optical aberrations exhibited statistical differences between S-Kappa and L-Kappa, their clinical significance is limited. Thus, a large Kappa angle might not substantially influence post-operative optical aberrations when intraoperative Kappa angle adjustments are implemented.

Feasibility study of treatment of mixed astigmatism with small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) by using research software.

PURPOSE: To report the preliminary experience and initial clinical results following SMILE for the treatment of mixed astigmatism. METHODS: Thirteen eyes of nine patients with a mean age of 27 ± 4.36 years were included in the series. In 8/13 eyes, myopic SMILE license and in 4/13 eyes, hyperopic SMILE license (available as part of an open/research software) was used for the treatment. The mean follow-up was 9.5 ± 8.7 (0.5-24) months, and the median follow-up was 6 months. SETTING: Nethradhama Superspeciality Eye Hospital, Bangalore, India. DESIGN: Exploratory study. RESULTS: The mean preoperative sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent (SE) were 1.44 ± 1.63, -2.70 ± 2.30, and -0.24 ± 1.14 D, which changed to -0.03 ± 0.30, -0.28 ± 0.48, and -0.18 ± 0.49 D, respectively, 6 months postoperatively. Furthermore, 85% (11/13) eyes were within ± 0.50 D, 92% (12/13) eyes were within ± 1.00 D, while all eyes were within ± 1.50 D of SE correction. All eyes were within ± 1.00 D of cylinder correction. In addition, 92% (12/13) eyes had UDVA better than 20/32, with 54% (7/13) eyes having UDVA 20/20 or better. Safety and efficacy indices were 1.08 and 0.92, respectively. No eyes lost more than 1 line of CDVA. The mean corneal higher order aberrations (HOA) increased from 0.111 ± 0.048 to 0.209 ± 0.056 (P < 0.001). The mean objective scatter index (OSI) did not show a significant change (pre = 0.71 ± 0.69, 6 months = 0.89 ± 0.20; P = 0.35). CONCLUSION: Early experience showed that SMILE was feasible for the management of eyes with mixed astigmatism, without any intraoperative complications, unique to the procedure.

SmartSight Correction of Compound Myopic Astigmatism Treatments With Preoperative Astigmatism > 1.00 Diopter Using the SCHWIND ATOS: A Retrospective Case Series.

PURPOSE: To evaluate moderate to high astigmatism corrections on the outcomes of SmartSight lenticule extraction for myopic astigmatism with a new femtosecond laser system. METHODS: Two hundred ninety-two eyes consecutively treated for myopic astigmatism with astigmatism magnitude greater than 1.00 diopter (D) were evaluated at the 6-month follow-up visit. The mean age of the patients was 29 ± 6 years with a mean spherical equivalent of -5.06 ± 2.20 diopters (D) and a mean magnitude of refractive astigmatism of 1.74 ± 0.61 D. RESULTS: At 6 months, astigmatism was 0.10 ± 0.20 D. Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities (UDVA and CDVA, respectively) were both 0.0 ± 0.1 logMAR. Differences between postoperative UDVA and preoperative CDVA and the change in CDVA were both +0.4 ± 0.7 lines better than preoperatively (P < .0003). CONCLUSIONS: Lenticule extraction treatment using Smart-Sight is safe and efficacious at 6 months. Findings suggest that moderate to high astigmatism improves after SmartSight lenticule extraction in the treatment of myopic astigmatism. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(5):e328-e335.].

Uneven Corneal Epithelial Redistribution After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Lenticule Intrastromal Keratoplasty in Correcting Moderate-to-High Hyperopia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the characteristic of corrective epithelial thickness after femtosecond laser-assisted lenticule intrastromal keratoplasty (LIKE) to correct moderate-to-high hyperopia. METHODS: The prospective case series study of the LIKE procedure was performed to correct moderate-to-high hyperopia. The epithelial thickness map was generated by anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) in the corneal central 9-mm zone. Keratometry and corneal higher order aberrations were analyzed by Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: In the 26 eyes of 13 participants who underwent the LIKE procedure for moderate-to-high hyperopia, the attempted spherical equivalence (SEQ) was +6.50 ± 1.09 diopters (D). Compared to the preoperative epithelial thickness maps, the postoperative epithelial thickness had become significantly thinner in the central 5-mm zone; the difference was 6 to 7 µm. The paracentral epithelium performed nonuniform remodeling; the thinnest epithelial thickness was located in the inferotemporal section, which has the greatest difference from the superonasal; the difference between these two was approximately 3 µm. Through correlation analysis, it was found that the sections with thinner epithelium were significantly related to corneal curvature and corneal vertical coma. CONCLUSIONS: The LIKE procedure can be used to correct moderate-to-high hyperopia. This study further indicated the epithelial remodeling characteristic after the LIKE procedure: the central and paracentral corneal epithelial thickness becomes thinner, and the epithelial thickness distributes non-uniformly, which may be the important factor of the postoperative curvature asymmetric distribution and induction of corneal vertical coma. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(5):e321-e327.].

In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Response to Three Different Laser Corneal Refractive Surgeries.

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of three common refractive surgeries on corneal biomechanics. METHODS: Two hundred seven patients who had refractive surgery were included in this study, of whom 65 received transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK), 73 received femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FSLASIK), and 69 received small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Each patient had biomechanical measurements using the Corvis ST (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The measurements included five parameters expected to be associated with corneal biomechanics: deformation amplitude ratio at 2 mm (DAR2), integrated inverse radius (IIR), stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), highest concavity time (HCT), and the updated stress-strain index (SSIv2). The variations in these parameters postoperatively among the three surgeries, and their relationship with corneal thickness (CCT) and intraocular pressure measured by the Dynamic Contour Tonometer (DCT-IOP) were analyzed. RESULTS: SP-A1 decreased significantly from preoperatively to 3 months postoperatively in all three groups, whereas DAR2 and IIR increased significantly, all indicating stiffness losses. Between 3 and 6 months postoperatively, the results were inconsistent, with DAR2 decreasing (indicating stiffness increases) and IIR increasing (denoting stiffness decreases) in the FS-LASIK and SMILE groups. The decrease in SSIv2 (the only measure of corneal material stiffness) postoperatively was comparatively less pronounced at both 3 and 6 months postoperatively. On the other hand, HCT remained generally stable after all three surgeries. Unlike DAR2, IIR, and SP-A1, the changes postoperatively in stiffness parameters HCT and SSIv2 were independent of the corresponding changes in both DCT-IOP and CCT. CONCLUSIONS: Among the stiffness parameters considered, SSIv2 was not correlated with CCT or DCT-IOP, and holds promise for representing the corneal material stiffness and how it remains largely unaffected by refractive surgeries. Overall, FS-LASIK had the most significant impact on corneal stiffness, followed by SMILE, and finally tPRK. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(5):e344-e352.].

Corneal Stroma Analysis and Related Ocular Manifestations in Recovered COVID-19 Patients.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) on corneal stroma characteristics, ocular manifestations, and post-recovery refractive surgery outcomes after varying recovery durations. Methods: Fresh corneal lenticules from patients with post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19; recovered within 135 days) and healthy controls (HCs) after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery were obtained for experimental validation of SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility, morphological changes, and immune response of the corneal stroma. Corneal optical density (CD) was measured using the Pentacam HR. Corneal epithelium thickness (ET) and endothelium parameters were evaluated by wide-field optical coherence tomography (OCT) and non-contact specular microscopy (SP-1P), respectively. All the patients were assessed after SMILE surgery until 3 month of follow-up. Results: The cornea was susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 with the presence of SARS-CoV-2 receptors (CD147 and ACE2) and spike protein remnants (4 out of 58) in post-recovery corneal lenticules. Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 infection triggered immune responses in the corneal stroma, with elevated IL-6 levels observed between 45 and 75 days post-recovery, which were then lower at around day 105. Concurrently, corneal mid-stromal nerve length and branching were initially higher in the 60D to 75D group and returned to control levels by day 135. A similar trend was observed in CD within zones 0 to 2 and 2 to 6 and in the hexagonal cells (HEX) ratio in endothelial cells, whereas ET remained consistent. Notably, these changes did not affect the efficacy, safety, or predictability of post-recovery SMILE surgery. Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 induces temporal alterations in corneal stromal morphology and function post-recovery. These findings provided a theoretical basis for corneal health and refractive surgery management in the post-COVID-19 milieu.

Association of myopia and astigmatism with postoperative ocular high order aberration after small incision lenticule extraction.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the correlation between higher-order aberrations (HOA) after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and the severity of myopia and astigmatism, along with the relevant factors. These findings will provide valuable insights for decreasing the occurrence of HOA after SMILE and enhancing visual quality. METHODS: A total of 75 patients (150 eyes) with myopia and astigmatism who underwent SMILE were categorized into four groups based on the severity of myopia and astigmatism: Myopia Group 1 (Group M1, spherical diopter ranged from -1.00 D to -4.00 D), Myopia Group 2 (Group M2, spherical diopter ranged from -4.10 D to -10.00 D), Astigmatism Group 1 (Group A1, cylindrical diopter ranged from 0 D to -1.00 D), and Astigmatism Group 2 (Group A2, cylindrical diopter ranged from -1.10 D to -3.00 D). A comprehensive assessment was performed to examine the association between HOA and various relevant factors, including a detailed analysis of the subgroups. RESULTS: Group M1 had significantly lower levels of total eye coma aberration (CA), corneal total HOA (tHOA), internal tHOA, and vertical CA ( Z 3 - 1 ) after SMILE than Group M2 (P < 0.05). Similarly, Group A1 had significantly lower levels of total eye tHOA, CA, trefoil aberration (TA), corneal tHOA, TA, and vertical TA ( Z 3 - 3 ) after SMILE than Group A2 (P < 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis indicated a statistically significant positive relationship between the severity of myopia/astigmatism and most HOA (P < 0.05). Subgroup evaluations demonstrated a notable increase in postoperative HOA associated with myopia and astigmatism in Groups M2 and A2 compared with the control group. Lenticule thickness, postoperative central corneal thickness (CCT), postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), and postoperative corneal Km and Cyl were strongly correlated with most HOA. Age, eyes, and postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) were only associated with specific HOA. CONCLUSION: HOA positively correlated with the severity of myopia and astigmatism after SMILE. However, this relationship was not linear. HOA after SMILE was influenced by various factors, and additional specialized investigations are required to establish its clinical importance.

Investigation of the optimal cutting depth in small incision lenticule extraction based on a collagen fibril crimping constitutive model of the cornea.

To investigate the optimal cutting depth (Cap) in small incision lenticule extraction from the perspective of corneal biomechanics, a three-dimensional finite element model of the cornea was established using a stromal sub-regional material model to simulate small incision lenticule extraction. The displacement difference PΔ at the central point of the posterior corneal surface before and after lenticule extraction, as well as the von Mises stress at four points of different thicknesses in the center of the cornea, were analyzed using the finite element model considering the hyperelastic property and the difference in stiffness between the anterior and posterior of the cornea. The numerical curves of PΔ-Cap and von Mises Stress-Cap relations at different diopters show that the displacement difference PΔ has a smallest value at the same diopter. In this case, the von Mises stress at four points with different thicknesses in the center of the cornea was also minimal. Which means that the optimal cutting depth exsisting in the cornea. Moreover, PΔ-Cap curves for different depth of stromal stiffness boundaries show that the optimal cap thickness would change with the depth of the stromal stiffness boundary. These results are of guiding significance for accurately formulating small incision lenticule extraction surgery plans and contribute to the advancement of research on the biomechanical properties of the cornea.

[Alternative methods of surgical treatment of keratoconus]. / Al'ternativnye metody khirurgicheskogo lecheniya keratokonusa.

The introduction of early diagnostic methods for keratoconus into clinical practice has become the basis for the development of surgical treatment techniques for this pathology, such as corneal collagen crosslinking and interlamellar keratoplasty with implantation of intrastromal segments. The article analyzes the results of research by Russian and foreign specialists in these areas and presents the data on the combination of SMILE surgery and corneal crosslinking, the Rome protocol of corneal crosslinking, modifications of interlamellar keratoplasty, the use of femtosecond laser technologies, and some pilot studies. Modern requirements for ophthalmological care require a personalized approach to each patient, and therefore the surgeon should have a wide range of surgical methods of treatment applicable to different patient cohorts. The described methods of treatment, according to the authors, are the most promising.