Low Contrast Acuity Outcomes After SMILE and LASIK.

PURPOSE: To compare early visual quality of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in terms of low contrast acuity. METHODS: A secondary analysis was performed using a harmonized dataset derived from two completed prospective cohort studies on active-duty military service members undergoing either SMILE (n = 37), wavefront-guided (WFG) LASIK (n = 51), or wavefront-optimized (WFO) LASIK (n = 56). Night vision and photopic and mesopic low contrast visual acuity (LCVA) up to 3 months postoperatively were compared between groups. RESULTS: Compared to SMILE-treated eyes, WFG LASIK-treated eyes had significantly better night vision and photopic LCVA at 1 month postoperatively (beta = -0.039, P = .016; beta = -0.043, P = .007, respectively). WFO LASIK-treated eyes had significantly better photopic LCVA at 1 month postoperatively (beta = -0.039, P = .012) but had worse mesopic LCVA at 3 months postoperatively (beta = 0.033, P = .015) versus SMILE-treated eyes. CONCLUSIONS: SMILE and LASIK, on either a WFG or WFO laser platform, yielded excellent outcomes, but LCVA seemed to recover quicker following LASIK compared to SMILE. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e667-e671.].

Comparison of long-term changes in the effective optical zone following SMILE and FS-LASIK for moderate and high myopia.

BACKGROUND: Visual quality after corneal refractive surgery is linked to the postoperative effective optical zone (EOZ). This study aims to compare long-term changes in the EOZ following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for moderate and high myopia. METHODS: This study included 42 patients (72 eyes) who underwent either SMILE (36 eyes) or FS-LASIK (36 eyes). A custom software program based on the tangential curvature difference map of the Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) was used to define the EOZ at 3 and 7 years postoperatively. The EOZ, its chronological changes compared to the programmed optical zone (POZ), and the corneal wavefront aberrations following SMILE and FS-LASIK were analyzed. Correlations between the EOZ changes and relevant parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: Three years postoperatively, EOZ following SMILE and FS-LASIK were 5.13 ± 0.27 mm and 4.70 ± 0.24 mm (P < 0.001), respectively. Seven years postoperatively, EOZ following SMILE and FS-LASIK decreased to 5.03 ± 0.28 mm and 4.63 ± 0.23 mm (P < 0.001), respectively. At postoperative 7 years, the percentages of EOZ/POZ were negatively correlated with Q-value changes (ß = -5.120, P = 0.009) following SMILE and positively correlated with the cylinder correction (ß = 1.184, P = 0.004) following FS-LASIK. The induced spherical aberrations in the SMILE group were less than those in the FS-LASIK group (P < 0.05) and were negatively correlated with the EOZ/POZ (ß = -16.653, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The EOZ following SMILE was larger than that following FS-LASIK in the long postoperative term for moderate and high myopia. Furthermore, a continual reduction in the EOZ was noted after both surgical modalities.

Repeatability and reproducibility of a new method for centration analysis via optical zone tangent points after corneal refractive surgery.

PURPOSE: To investigate the repeatability and reproducibility of a new method for centration analysis after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK). METHODS: This study comprised 29 eyes treated with SMILE and 24 with FS-LASIK. Decentrations were analyzed using tangential and pachymetry difference maps respectively. Both difference maps were generated with a Scheimpflug tomographer (Pentacam) for each eye, using preoperative and 3-month postoperative scans. Repeatability and reproducibility were evaluated by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), within-subject standard deviation (Sw), and coefficient of repeatability (CR). RESULTS: ICC, Sw, and CR showed good to excellent repeatability in locating the coordinates of the optical zone (OZ) center on both maps, with values ranging from 0.84 to 0.96, 0.03 to 0.13, and 0.08 to 0.36 respectively. The repeatability of the total decentration from the preoperative corneal vertex on the tangential curvature difference maps( d TC ) and the pachymetry difference maps( d PC ) were moderate and good, respectively. The ICC, Sw, and CR of d TC were 0.63, 0.09, and 0.25, respectively. The ICC, Sw, and CR of d PC were 0.77, 0.10, and 0.28, respectively. The reproducibility of the OZ center measurements was excellent for the tangential difference maps (ICC ≥ 0.97 ) and good for the pachymetry difference maps (ICC ≥ 0.86). ICC, Sw, and CR showed excellent reproducibility of d TC , with values of 0.95, 0.03, and 0.08, respectively. ICC, Sw, and CR showed good reproducibility of d PC , with values of 0.89, 0.06, and 0.17, respectively. CONCLUSION: The centration analysis method used in this study showed good to excellent repeatability and reproducibility in locating the coordinates of the center of the OZ on the tangential and pachymetry difference maps.

Banking of post-SMILE stromal lenticules for additive keratoplasty: A new challenge for eye banks?

PURPOSE: ReLEx (Refractive Lenticule Extraction) Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE), the second generation of ReLEx Femtosecond Lenticule Extraction (FLEx), is a minimally invasive, flapless procedure designed to treat refractive errors such as myopia, hyperopia, presbyopia, and astigmatism. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the methods for preserving SMILE-derived lenticules and discusses their potential future applications. METHODS: A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, focusing on articles published up to January 2024 and available in English. The authors also evaluated the reference lists of the collected papers to identify any additional relevant research. RESULTS: No standardized protocols currently exist for the storage or clinical application of SMILE-derived lenticules. However, these lenticules present a promising resource for therapeutic uses, particularly in addressing the shortage of donor corneal tissues. Their potential applications include inlay and overlay additive keratoplasty, as well as other ocular surface applications. Further research is needed to establish reliable protocols for their preservation and clinical use. CONCLUSION: SMILE-derived lenticules offer significant potential as an alternative to donor corneal tissues. Standardizing their storage and application methods could enhance their use in clinical settings.

Three-year results of central corneal stromal thickness reduction in small-incision lenticule extraction for high myopia correction.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the long-term corneal stromal remodeling and central stromal thickness (CST) reduction accuracy after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for high myopia correction. METHODS: This prospective study included 30 patients (50 eyes) who had undergone SMILE. Measurements of CST reduction using optical coherence tomography were performed at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years after surgery. Correlations were performed between planned and achieved CST reductions. RESULTS: The study enrolled 50 eyes of 30 patients. The mean spherical equivalent was -9.25±1.52 D(diopters). The postoperative CST increased in the first month after surgery and remained stable for a year. Thereafter, it remained stable during follow-up from 1 to 3 years postoperatively. The predicted CST reduction was 146.4 ± 10.3 µm. The achieved CST reductions at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years after surgery were 135.3 ± 12.1 µm, 130.8 ± 10.6 µm, 125.9 ± 9.4 µm, and 122.2 ± 10.6 µm, respectively. An overestimation of CST reduction was observed three years after surgery. Correlation analysis revealed a strong correlation between planned and achieved CST reductions; however, no correlation was found between CST reductions predicted error and the planned CST reductions. CONCLUSION: During long-term follow-up, our findings revealed a significant stromal remodeling following SMILE in patients with high myopia. Therefore, clinicians should consider it when screening patients with high myopia for SMILE.

Longitudinal analysis of wound healing response post SMILE and LASIK surgery using proteomic profiling of tears.

Different types of refractive surgeries often exhibit differences in wound healing responses. The current study investigated post-operative tear protein profiles in subjects who underwent LASIK and SMILE to elucidate global changes to the proteomic profile during the period the patient cornea undergoes healing. In this study, 10 patients underwent LASIK and SMILE surgery with a contralateral paired eye design. Tear samples were collected using Schirmer's strips preoperatively, at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. Quantitative ITRAQ labeled proteomics was performed and the tear protein ratios were normalized to pre-operative protein levels for each subject. Whole proteomics identified 1345 proteins in tears from LASIK and 1584 proteins in SMILE across time points. About 67 proteins were common in LASIK and SMILE tears across all the time points. Wound healing responses were differentially regulated between two refractive surgeries (SMILE and LASIK). The proteins Ceruloplasmin, Clusterin, Serotransferrin were upregulated at 1 month and 3 months and downregulated at 6 months post operatively in LASIK surgery where as in SMILE these were downregulated. Galectin 3 binding protein showed upregulation at 1 month and the levels decreased at 3 months and 6 months postop in LASIK tears whereas the levels increased at 3 months and 6 months post-op in SMILE tears. The levels of proteins that protect from oxidative stress were higher in SMILE as compared to LASIK postoperatively. The extracellular matrix proteins showed an increase in expression at 6 months in SMILE tears and was stabilized at 6 months in LASIK tears post operatively. Different refractive surgeries induce distinct wound healing responses as identified in tears. This study has implications in targeting key proteins for improving the clinical outcome postrefractive surgery.

Hydroxyproline Concentration and Associated Factors of Preserved Small Incision Lenticule Extraction-Derived Corneal Stromal Lenticules.

PURPOSE: To evaluate changes of hydroxyproline concentration and its influencing factors of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)-derived corneal stromal lenticules with different preservation methods. METHODS: A total of 390 corneal stromal lenticules of 195 patients were derived from SMILE surgeries. Thirty of the lenticules were classified as the fresh (control) group, and the rest were randomly and evenly divided and stored in anhydrous glycerol, silicone oil, Optisol, and cryopreservation for 1 day, 1 week, or 1 month. A hydroxyproline assay kit (ab222941, Abcam) was used to measure the hydroxyproline concentration in each preservation method. Concentrations of MMP-2, TIMP-2, TNFα, TGFß2, and reactive oxygen species were also evaluated. RESULTS: In the anhydrous glycerol group, the concentration of hydroxyproline decreased within 1 week (fresh: 1 dΔ = 0.229, P < 0.001*; 1 d - 1 wΔ = 0.055, P < 0.001*) while that in the silicone oil group remained stable in 1 week (1 d - 1 wΔ = -0.005, P = 0.929) and decreased significantly in 1 m (1 m - 1 wΔ = -0.041, P = 0.003*). The sequence of hydroxyproline concentration in the Optisol group was 1 m > 1 day > 1 week. Hydroxyproline concentration in the cryopreservation group decreased within 1 m. Hydroxyproline concentration was highest in the Optisol group and lowest in the anhydrous glycerol group under the same preservation time. Hydroxyproline concentration was negatively correlated with MMP-2 (r = -0.16, P = 0.421) and TIMP-2 (r = -0.56, P = 0.002*) while MMP-2 and TNFα (r = 0.17, P = 0.242), TIMP-2 and TGFß2 (r = 0.21, P = 0.207), and TNFα and reactive oxygen species (r = 0.52, P = 0.007*) were positively correlated. CONCLUSIONS: More collagen was retained in SMILE lenticules preserved in Optisol under the same preservation time. The mechanism of the changes of collagen in preserved SMILE-derived lenticules and oxidative stress requires additional investigation.

Comparison of Objective Visual Quality Following SMILE and SmartPulse Technology-Assisted TransPRK at a 1,050-Hz Ablation Frequency for Moderate-to-High Myopia.

PURPOSE: To compare the objective visual quality of moderate-to-high myopia corrected by small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) at a 1,050-Hz ablation frequency, assisted by Smart-Pulse technology (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions). METHODS: This study involved 123 patients (123 eyes) with moderate-to-high myopia between July 2020 and January 2021. They were categorized into the SMILE group (67 patients, 67 eyes) and the TransPRK group (56 patients, 56 eyes). Follow-ups were conducted at 6 months postoperatively to record the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity, and the Strehl ratio and higher order aberrations were measured using the Sirius anterior segment analysis device (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions) under a 6-mm pupil diameter at various postoperative intervals. RESULTS: At 1 week and 1 month postoperatively, the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) in the SMILE group was superior to that in the TransPRK group (P < .05 for both). At 1 week and 1 month postoperatively, the Strehl ratio value in the SMILE group was higher than that in the TransPRK group (P < .05 for both). At 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, coma was greater in the SMILE group than in the TransPRK group (P < .05 for all). Spherical aberrations were lower in the SMILE group than in the TransPRK group at 3 and 6 months postoperatively (P < .05). At 6 months postoperatively, UDVA was -0.09 ± 0.08 and -0.11 ± 0.05 logMAR in the SMILE and TransPRK groups, respectively, which exceeded their preoperative corrected distance visual acuity of -0.05 ± 0.04 and -0.09 ± 0.08 logMAR (all P < .001). Compared with preoperative values, the Strehl ratio, total higher order, coma, and spherical aberration differences were significantly increased postoperatively in both groups (all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Both surgical methods improved UDVA and each had its advantages. The visual quality of SMILE was superior at 1 week and 1 month postoperatively (Strehl ratio values were higher than those of the TransPRK group), and its spherical aberration was lower than that of the TransPRK group at 3 and 6 months; TransPRK with SmartPulse technology with a 1,050-Hz ablation frequency showed that coma was significantly lower than that of the SMILE group at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(7):e490-e498.].

Early elastic and viscoelastic corneal biomechanical changes after photorefractive keratectomy and small incision lenticule extraction.

PURPOSE: To compare early changes in the corneal biomechanical parameters after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and their correlations with corneal shape parameters. METHODS: One hundred twenty four eyes received myopic PRK and SMILE for similar amounts of myopia. Corneal tomography with Pentacam HR, biomechanical parameters using Corvis ST, and Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) were evaluated before and 2 weeks after surgery. The change in each parameter was compared between groups, while the difference in central corneal thickness and cornea-compensated intraocular pressure measured before and after surgery were considered as covariates. RESULTS: A significant reduction was seen in the corneal stiffness parameter at first applanation, and an increase in deformation amplitude ratio (DAR), and integrated inverse radius (IIR) in both groups after surgery (p < 0.001) Changes in DAR, and IIR were significantly greater in the SMILE than in the PRK group (p < 0.001) Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) decreased in both SMILE and PRK groups after surgery, (p < 0.001) with no statistically significant difference between groups (p > 0.05) Among new Corvis ST parameters, DAR showed a significant correlation with changes in Ambrosio relational thickness in both groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques caused significant changes in corneal biomechanics in the early postoperative period, with greater elastic changes in the SMILE group compared to the PRK group, likely due to lower tension in the SMILE cap and thinner residual stromal bed in SMILE. There were no differences in viscoelastic changes between them, so the lower CH may reflect the volume of tissue removed.

[Whether laser corneal refractive surgery combined with presbyopia correction technology could treat presbyopia].

Presbyopia refers to a phenomenon in which the ability of the eye to accommodate is insufficient to meet the daily demand for proximity due to age. In modern society, more and more patients over 40 years old want to solve visual problems caused by presbyopia and refractive errors, which poses new challenges for clinical laser corneal refractive surgery, and a variety of combined presbyopia correction technologies and programs have emerged. However, whether laser corneal refractive surgery combined with presbyopia correction technology could treat presbyopia deserves clinical attention. Based on the mechanism of laser corneal refractive surgery and various presbyopia correction techniques, this article deeply analyzes the purpose and effect of laser corneal refractive surgery combined with presbyopia correction technology. It is proposed that this surgical treatment could only play a role in correcting presbyopia at present and should be performed accordingly.

[Chinese expert consensus on the perioperative medication in laser corneal refractive surgery (2024)].

With the increasing incidence of myopia year by year and the continuous progress of various treatment techniques, laser corneal refractive surgery has become one of the important ways to correct refractive errors. The rational drug use in the perioperative period is important for the success of surgery and reduction of complications. In 2019, based on the development of laser corneal refractive surgery in China, experts from the Refractive Surgery Experts Group of Ocular Microcirculation Branch of Chinese Society of Microcirculation and the Ophthalmology Branch in the Chinese Medical Association formed the "Chinese Expert Consensus on the Perioperative Medication in Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery (2019)". To further promote the expansion of new clinical technologies and surgical methods, and to improve surgical efficacy, the Refractive Surgery Experts Group of Ocular Microcirculation Branch of Chinese Society of Microcirculation, according to the latest domestic and foreign research results, has recently updated the consensus after a collective discussion.

Feasibility study of treatment of mixed astigmatism with small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) by using research software.

PURPOSE: To report the preliminary experience and initial clinical results following SMILE for the treatment of mixed astigmatism. METHODS: Thirteen eyes of nine patients with a mean age of 27 ± 4.36 years were included in the series. In 8/13 eyes, myopic SMILE license and in 4/13 eyes, hyperopic SMILE license (available as part of an open/research software) was used for the treatment. The mean follow-up was 9.5 ± 8.7 (0.5-24) months, and the median follow-up was 6 months. SETTING: Nethradhama Superspeciality Eye Hospital, Bangalore, India. DESIGN: Exploratory study. RESULTS: The mean preoperative sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent (SE) were 1.44 ± 1.63, -2.70 ± 2.30, and -0.24 ± 1.14 D, which changed to -0.03 ± 0.30, -0.28 ± 0.48, and -0.18 ± 0.49 D, respectively, 6 months postoperatively. Furthermore, 85% (11/13) eyes were within ± 0.50 D, 92% (12/13) eyes were within ± 1.00 D, while all eyes were within ± 1.50 D of SE correction. All eyes were within ± 1.00 D of cylinder correction. In addition, 92% (12/13) eyes had UDVA better than 20/32, with 54% (7/13) eyes having UDVA 20/20 or better. Safety and efficacy indices were 1.08 and 0.92, respectively. No eyes lost more than 1 line of CDVA. The mean corneal higher order aberrations (HOA) increased from 0.111 ± 0.048 to 0.209 ± 0.056 (P < 0.001). The mean objective scatter index (OSI) did not show a significant change (pre = 0.71 ± 0.69, 6 months = 0.89 ± 0.20; P = 0.35). CONCLUSION: Early experience showed that SMILE was feasible for the management of eyes with mixed astigmatism, without any intraoperative complications, unique to the procedure.

Comparison of visual outcomes and optical aberrations after SMILE with intraoperative Kappa angle adjustments between small and large Kappa angles.

This study compares postoperative visual outcomes and optical aberrations after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) in patients with both small (S-Kappa: Kappa angle < 0.2 mm) and large Kappa (L-Kappa: Kappa angle ≥ 0.2 mm) angles. The evaluated aberrations include total higher-order aberrations (HOAs), horizontal coma (HC), vertical coma (VC), and spherical aberrations (SA), with procedures incorporating intraoperative Kappa angle adjustments. We retrospectively analyzed patient records undergoing SMILE utilizing linear mixed models (LMM). We assessed adjusted mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), Strehl ratio (SR), total HOAs, VC, and SA at pupils of 3 mm and 6 mm for both S-Kappa and L-Kappa. The disparities between S-Kappa and L-Kappa were evaluated by LMM's adjusted mean differences. The differences in optical metrics were also assessed in eyes grouped by myopia levels: low, moderate, and high. A sensitivity analysis was conducted on a threshold of Kappa angle at 0.3 mm. Eight-five patients (169 eyes) were analyzed, and no significant pre-operative difference was found in UDVA (p = .222) or spherical equivalent (p = .433). Post-operative differences were found in SR at 3 mm pupil size (-0.06, p = .022), total HOA 3 mm (0.15, p = .022), HC 3 mm (0.04, p = .042), VC 3 mm and 6 mm (-0.08, p = .041; 0.04, p = .041). The stratified analysis for high myopia revealed significant differences in UDVA (-0.04, p = .037), HC 3 mm (0.07, p = .03), VC 6 mm (-0.21, p = .001), and SA 3 mm and 6 mm (0.07, p = .037; -0.09, p = .037). Sensitivity analysis showed no significant difference using a 0.3 mm Kappa threshold. While some optical aberrations exhibited statistical differences between S-Kappa and L-Kappa, their clinical significance is limited. Thus, a large Kappa angle might not substantially influence post-operative optical aberrations when intraoperative Kappa angle adjustments are implemented.

Total and simulated keratometry measurements using IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam AXL after small incision lenticule extraction.

PURPOSE: Calculating the intraocular lens (IOL) in patients after corneal refractive surgery presents a challenge. Because an overestimation of corneal power in cases undergone this surgery leading to a subsequent under-correction of IOL power. However, recent advancements in technology have eliable measurement of total corneal power. The aim of this research was to assess the agreement in simulated keratometry (SimK) and total keratometry (TK) values between IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam AXL. METHODS: The study involved 99 patients (99 eyes) undergone small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery. Each patient underwent scans using IOL Master 700 and Pentacam AXL. The following parameters were recorded: SimK1, SimK2, Total K1 (TK1), and Total K2 (TK2) for IOLMaster 700; and SimK1, SimK2, True Net Power (TNP) K1, TNPK2, Total Corneal Refractive Power (TCRP) K1, and TCRP K2 for Pentacam AXL. Agreement between the two devices was evaluated using Bland-Altman plot, while paired t-test was utilized to compare any differences in the same parameter by both instruments. RESULTS: The results revealed a strong correlation between the two devices.Noticeable comparability was identified for all SimK variables. However, there were noticeable differences in TK measurements as well as TK1-TNPK1, TK2-TNP K2, TK1-TCRP K1, and TK2-TCRP K2 parameters when comparing the two devices. The IOLMaster 700 consistently measured steeper values than the Pentacam AXL, with significant and clinically relevant differences of 1.34, 1.37, 0.87, and 0.95 diopters, respectively. CONCLUSION: While there was a noticeable correlation between the IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam AXL in SimK measurements, a marked difference was noted in TK values. The two devices cannot be used interchangeably when quantifying TK values.

Risk Factors for Re-treatment After Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction (KLEx) for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To identify potential risk factors that increase the likelihood of re-treatment following keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) for myopia and myopic astigmatism. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism who underwent KLEx using the VisuMax 500 laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec) between April 2015 and December 2020. Patients were assigned to one of two groups: the control group and the re-treatment group (if they had additional refractive surgery within 2 years of the primary treatment). The effect of different preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters on the re-treatment rate was analyzed. RESULTS: Overall 1,822 eyes of 938 patients were analyzed. In total, 2.96% of eyes (n = 54) underwent re-treatment. The re-treated patients were more likely to be women and have high myopia, high astigmatism, steep corneas, higher ocular residual astigmatism, and residual myopic and/or astigmatic refractive error. In contrast, no significant correlation was found between re-treatment rate and age, chord µ, type of astigmatism, and corneal thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with higher rates of retreatment after KLEx included female gender, manifest refractive high myopia (> -5.00 diopters [D]), astigmatism (> 2.00 D), spherical equivalent (> 6.00 D), ocular residual astigmatism, steeper corneas, and postoperative residual myopic and astigmatic refractive errors. This study may help to preoperatively detect patients at risk for re-treatment, improve preoperative patient counseling, and optimize patient selection to reduce future re-treatment rates. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(6):e362-e370.].

BCLA CLEAR Presbyopia: Management with corneal techniques.

Corneal techniques for enhancing near and intermediate vision to correct presbyopia include surgical and contact lens treatment modalities. Broad approaches used independently or in combination include correcting one eye for distant and the other for near or intermediate vision, (termed monovision or mini-monovision depending on the degree of anisometropia) and/or extending the eye's depth of focus [1]. This report reviews the evidence for the treatment profile, safety, and efficacy of the current range of corneal techniques for managing presbyopia. The visual needs and expectations of the patient, their ocular characteristics, and prior history of surgery are critical considerations for patient selection and preoperative evaluation. Contraindications to refractive surgery include unstable refraction, corneal abnormalities, inadequate corneal thickness for the proposed ablation depth, ocular and systemic co-morbidities, uncontrolled mental health issues and unrealistic patient expectations. Laser refractive options for monovision include surface/stromal ablation techniques and keratorefractive lenticule extraction. Alteration of spherical aberration and multifocal ablation profiles are the primary means for increasing ocular depth of focus, using surface and non-surface laser refractive techniques. Corneal inlays use either small aperture optics to increase depth of field or modify the anterior corneal curvature to induce corneal multifocality. In presbyopia correction by conductive keratoplasty, radiofrequency energy is applied to the mid-peripheral corneal stroma, leading to mid-peripheral corneal shrinkage and central corneal steepening. Hyperopic orthokeratology lens fitting can induce spherical aberration and correct some level of presbyopia. Postoperative management, and consideration of potential complications, varies according to technique applied and the time to restore corneal stability, but a minimum of 3 months of follow-up is recommended after corneal refractive procedures. Ongoing follow-up is important in orthokeratology and longer-term follow-up may be required in the event of late complications following corneal inlay surgery.

Effective optical zone: Differences between small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond LASIK for myopia.

PURPOSE: To compare the effective optical zones (EOZs) of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (F-LASIK) by utilizing topographic methods on the tangential curvature difference map at postoperative 1 year and to identify parameters linked to the EOZ alterations following both surgeries. METHODS: Myopic patients who underwent SMILE or F-LASIK were included in the study. Patients with refractive error greater than -9.0 D sphere or -0.50 D of astigmatism were excluded from the study. EOZs were measured at postoperative 1 year by using the tangential curvature difference map of the Scheimpflug tomography system. Correlations between the EOZ alterations and relevant parameters were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 59 eyes in the SMILE group and 65 eyes in the F-LASIK group were assessed. The decrease in EOZ compared with the programmed optical zone was significantly higher in the F-LASIK group ( P < 0.001). The increase in corneal asphericity was significantly relevant to the decrease in EOZin both groups according to the multiple regression analysis ( P < 0.001, B/95% CI: 0.62/0.34 and 0.90, standardized-Beta: 0.587 for the SMILE group; P < 0.001, B/95% CI: 0.74/0.41 and 1.07, standardized-Beta: 0.631 for the F-LASIK group). CONCLUSION: The EOZ decreased 1 year after both SMILE and F-LASIK. The SMILE group showed less EOZ reduction than F-LASIK patients relative to the programmed optical zone. The decrease in EOZ was correlated with the increase in corneal asphericity in both groups.

Clinical outcomes of the light-adjustable lens in eyes with a history of prior corneal refractive surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual and refractive outcomes in eyes with a history of laser corneal refractive surgery implanted with the second-generation light-adjustable lens (LAL). SETTING: Private practice, Sioux Falls, South Dakota. DESIGN: Retrospective, consecutive case series. METHODS: Eyes with a history of prior corneal refractive surgery that underwent cataract surgery with implantation of the LAL and were targeted for plano were included. Data on the type and number of prior refractive surgeries were collected, in addition to the timing and number of postoperative adjustments. The primary outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity, and the percentage (%) of eyes within ±0.25 diopter (D), ±0.50 D, and ±1.00 D of their refractive target. RESULTS: 76 eyes from 70 patients were included. A total of 45 eyes with a history of 1 prior refractive surgery and 31 eyes with a history of ≥2 refractive surgeries were included. 74% (n = 56) of all eyes achieved UDVA of 20/20 or better, 88% (n = 67) achieved 20/25 UDVA or better, and 93% (n = 71) were correctable to 20/20 or better postoperatively. For refractive outcomes, 66% of eyes (n = 50) were within ±0.25 D and 86% (n = 65) were within ±0.50 D of refractive target. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a history of laser corneal refractive surgery achieved favorable visual and refractive outcomes with the LAL. This intraocular lens (IOL), which affords postoperative adjustability, is a promising option for patients with a history of corneal refractive surgery who maintain high expectations for functional uncorrected acuity after cataract surgery.

Comparative Study of Primary SMILE, SMILE Enhancement, and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK on Higher Order Aberrations and Corneal Densitometry.

PURPOSE: To compare differences in corneal densitometry (CD) and higher order aberrations (HOAs) in eyes that underwent small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism at postoperative months 3, 6, and 12, and to evaluate their changes in a separate cohort of eyes after SMILE enhancement. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, paired-eye clinical trial, consecutive eligible participants were randomized to undergo SMILE or FS-LASIK in either eye. Main outcome measures were CD and HOAs preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. A separate cohort of consecutive patients who had SMILE and underwent enhancement were also included for comparison. RESULTS: For CD, no significant differences were found between SMILE and FS-LASIK up to month 12. For HOA measured by wavefront aberrometry, both SMILE and FS-LASIK had an increase in total root mean square (RMS) HOAs, spherical aberration (SA), and vertical coma up to month 12. SMILE had an additional increase in vertical quatrefoil, and FS-LASIK had an increase in horizontal coma at month 12. FS-LASIK had higher SA than SMILE, whereas SMILE had higher vertical quatrefoil than FS-LASIK at month 12. Central and posterior zone CD had significantly decreased after SMILE enhancement compared to after primary SMILE up to 2 years after enhancement. RMS HOAs, lower order aberrations, and SA were all increased after SMILE enhancement compared to after primary SMILE. CONCLUSIONS: SMILE induced lower SA but higher vertical quatrefoil than FS-LASIK at 1 year. Both SMILE and FS-LASIK had similar increases in RMS HOAs and vertical coma up to 1 year. There were no differences in CD between both groups. SMILE enhancement additionally had decreased central and posterior CD but greater RMS HOAs and SA compared to primary SMILE. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(5):e291-e303.].