Comparison of Double Endobutton and Clavicular Hook Plate in Acromioclavicular Joint Disruption: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) disruptions are corrected by surgery either with an endobutton or a hook plate. The results in the long term were found to be similar in many randomized controlled trials. This study aims to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the functional outcome and complications of double endo button versus clavicular hook plate (CHP) for ACJ disruption (Rockwood types III-VI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two authors independently searched related articles from electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science) till January 26, 2022. The data were extracted from the related articles and analyzed by Stata software. For bias calculation of each study, the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the RevMan 5.4 software were used. RESULTS: 14 cohort studies, 2 randomized control trial studies, and 1 case-control study including patients were selected in this meta-analysis. The results of our study showed a significantly higher Constant-Murley Score (WMD 5.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.23-9.36), Visual Analog Scale (WMD- 0.63, 95% CI [-0.79, -0.46]) and University of California at Los Angeles shoulder score (UCLA) scale (WMD 3.32, 95% CI [2.87, 3.77]) for double endobutton group. At the same time, some complications like implant failure were more common in the double endobutton group. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis shows better functional and clinical outcomes of shoulder joint for the treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) disruption cases (Rockwood types III-VI) with no need for secondary operation, unlike the CHP. Complications like subacromial erosion, ACJ arthrodesis, and infection rate are higher in the CHP group, whereas the chance of implant failure is higher in the double endobutton group.

RésuméLes perturbations de l'articulation acromio-claviculaire (ACJ) sont corrigées par chirurgie soit avec un endobouton, soit avec une plaque à crochets. Les résultats à long terme se sont révélés similaires dans de nombreux essais contrôlés randomisés. Cette étude vise à mener une méta-analyse pour évaluer les résultats fonctionnels et les complications du double endobouton par rapport à la plaque à crochet claviculaire (CHP) pour la perturbation de l'ACJ (Rockwood types III ­ VI).Matériels et méthodes:Deux auteurs ont recherché indépendamment des articles connexes dans des bases de données électroniques (PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, SCOPUS et Web of Science) jusqu'au 26 janvier 2022. Les données ont été extraites des articles connexes et analysées par le logiciel Stata. Pour le calcul du biais de chaque étude, l'échelle de Newcastle-Ottawa et le logiciel RevMan 5.4 ont été utilisés.Résultats:14 études de cohorte, 2 études d'essais contrôlés randomisés et 1 étude cas-témoins incluant des patients ont été sélectionnées dans cette méta-analyse. Les résultats de notre étude ont montré un score de Constant-Murley significativement plus élevé (WMD 5,79, intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % 2,23­9,36), une échelle visuelle analogique (WMD− 0,63, IC à 95 % [−0,79, −0,46]) et un score universitaire. de Californie sur l'échelle de score d'épaule de Los Angeles (UCLA) (WMD 3,32, IC à 95 % [2,87, 3,77]) pour le groupe à double endobouton. Dans le même temps, certaines complications comme l'échec de l'implant étaient plus fréquentes dans le groupe à double endobouton.Conclusion:Cette méta-analyse montre de meilleurs résultats fonctionnels et cliniques de l'articulation de l'épaule pour le traitement des cas de rupture de l'articulation acromio-claviculaire (ACJ) (types Rockwood III à VI) sans nécessité d'opération secondaire, contrairement à la CHP. Les complications telles que l'érosion sous-acromiale, l'arthrodèse de l'ACJ et le taux d'infection sont plus élevées dans le groupe CHP, alors que le risque d'échec de l'implant est plus élevé dans le groupe à double endobouton.

The therapeutic value of ipsilateral supraclavicular lymphadenectomy in locally advanced breast cancer: A review.

The treatment of isolated ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis for locally advanced breast cancer has always been a controversial issue for breast surgeons. However, with the further understanding of the metastasis and treatment of breast cancer, it is now considered to be a locally advanced disease, and there is a new debate on the treatment of isolated ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis. The author reviewed the relevant literature and briefly discussed the clinical significance of supraclavicular lymph node resection in patients with locally advanced breast cancer presenting with isolated ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis.

[Effectiveness of minimally invasive internal fixation with locking plates for mid-shaft clavicle fractures].

Objective: To explore effectiveness of minimally invasive internal fixation with locking plates for mid-shaft clavicle fractures. Methods: Between October 2022 and August 2023, 28 patients with mid-shaft clavicle fractures were treated by minimally invasive internal fixation with locking plates. There were 10 males and 18 females with a mean age of 46.2 years (range, 18-74 years). The fractures were caused by traffic accident in 16 patients, sports-related injury in 7 patients, and other injuries in 5 patients. According to Robinson classification, the fractures were classified as type 2A1 in 1 case, type 2A2 in 6 cases, type 2B1 in 15 cases, and type 2B2 in 6 cases. The interval between fracture and operation ranged from 5 hours to 21 days (median, 1.0 days). The pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 8.1±1.6. The VAS score at 3 days after operation and the occurrence of complications after operation were recorded. During follow-up, X-ray films were re-examined to observe the healing of the fracture; the shoulder joint function was evaluated according to the Constant-Murley score at 6 months, and the length of the incision scar (total length of the distal and proximal incisions) was measured. Results: All operations were successfully completed without any subclavian vascular or nerve damage. All incisions healed by first intention. The VAS score was 1.2±0.7 at 3 days after operation, and there was a significant difference in VAS score between pre- and post-operation ( t=8.704， P<0.001). At 1 week after operation, the patient's shoulder was basically painless, and they resumed normal life. All patients were followed up 12-20 months (mean, 13.3 months). X-ray films showed that the bone callus began to form at 2-4 months after operation (mean, 2.7 months). There was no delayed healing or non healing of the fracture, and no loosening or fracture of the internal fixators during follow-up. At 6 months after operation, the mean total incision length was 1.5 cm (range, 1.1-1.8 cm); no patient complained of numbness or paresthesia on subclavicular region or anterior chest wall. The Constant-Murley score of shoulder joint function was 93-100 (mean, 97.6). Conclusion: Minimally invasive internal fixation with locking plates is a good surgical method for treating mid-shaft clavicle fractures, with simple operation, minimal trauma, good postoperative results, and high satisfaction.

Missed Medial Clavicular Physeal Fracture-Posterior Dislocation Complicated by Brachiocephalic Pseudoaneurysm: A Case Report.

CASE: We present a 17-year-old male patient with an initially missed posterior sternoclavicular fracture dislocation who presented with symptoms related to thrombotic emboli arising from a pseudoaneurysm. He was treated 6 weeks after injury with a figure-of-eight tendon allograft repair with good clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: This is a unique presentation that highlights the significant risk of a missed diagnosis, life-threatening complications that may ensue, and biomechanically superior surgical intervention.

Evaluating the Effect of Rotator Cuff Repair With Concomitant Distal Claviculectomy on 2 and 4 Year Reoperation Rates.

BACKGROUND: The current literature has differing views on the efficacy of concomitant distal claviculectomy (DC) during rotator cuff repair (RCR) in preventing revision surgery. Our aim was to investigate the revision surgery rate between RCR with DC and RCR without DC. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using a national claims database. Patients undergoing open or arthroscopic primary RCR with or without concomitant DC were identified. The primary outcome was 4-year revision surgery rates. Univariate analysis was conducted using chi-square or Student t tests. Multivariable analysis was conducted using logistic regression, and an adjusted number needed to harm was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 131,232 patients met inclusion criteria. After logistic regression, patients undergoing RCR with DC had higher odds of requiring a subsequent DC procedure [OR; 95% CI; P-value (1.49; 1.35-1.64; P < 0.001)] but lower odds of any revision surgery (0.87; 0.80-0.91; P < 0.001) within 4 years than those who underwent RCR without DC. CONCLUSION: Although associated with a lower rate of overall revision surgeries within 2 and 4 years of RCR, those who underwent RCR with DC were 85% more likely at 2 years and 49% more likely at 4 years to undergo revision surgery of the distal clavicle than those without concomitant DC.

Smoking Is Markedly Associated With 30-Day Readmission and Revision Surgery After Surgical Treatment of Clavicle Fracture.

BACKGROUND: A recent database study found that 15.2% of clavicle fractures underwent surgical treatment. Recent evidence accentuates the role of smoking in predicting nonunion. The purpose of this study was to further elucidate the effect of smoking on the 30-day postoperative outcomes after surgical treatment of clavicle fractures. METHODS: The authors queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for all patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of clavicle fracture between 2015 and 2020. Multivariate logistic regression, adjusted for notable patient demographics and comorbidities, was used to identify associations between current smoking status and postoperative complications. RESULTS: In total, 6,132 patients were included in this study of whom 1,510 (24.6%) were current smokers and 4,622 (75.4%) were nonsmokers. Multivariate analysis found current smoking status to be significantly associated with higher rates of deep incisional surgical-site infection (OR, 7.87; 95% CI, 1.51 to 41.09; P = 0.014), revision surgery (OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.67 to 4.49; P < 0.001), and readmission (OR, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.84 to 5.89; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Current smoking status is markedly associated with higher rates of deep incisional surgical-site infection, revision surgery, and readmission within 30 days after open reduction and internal fixation of clavicle fracture.

Distal Clavicle Fracture Repair Utilizing Plate and Suture-Button Fixation: Optimizing Intraoperative Fluoroscopy.

VIDEO AVAILABLE AT: https://ota.org/education/ota-online-resources/video-library-procedures-techniques/distal-clavicle-fracture-repair.

Recent Trends in Concomitant Distal Clavicle Excision During Rotator Cuff Repair.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate trends in distal clavicle excision (DCE) in association with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) from 2010 to 2019. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify all patients who underwent arthroscopic RCR from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2019, and was further subdivided into procedure type: (1) isolated RCR; and (2) RCR with arthroscopic or open DCE. The proportion of each surgery type, by year and within groups, was calculated. The Cochran-Armitage test for trend was used to analyze yearly proportions of RCR with concomitant DCE. In a sample size of 19,163 patients, the proportion of RCR with DCE decreased from 51.2% to 40.8% (r = -0.830; p = 0.003). Although the results of this study suggest that surgeons are performing fewer DCEs in the setting of RCR, many DCEs are still being done. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(2):077-079, 2024).

Tendon graft through the coracoid tunnel versus under the coracoid for coracoclavicular/acromioclavicular reconstruction shows no difference in radiographic or patient-reported outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this prospective study was to report the outcomes of two different methods in CC and AC reconstruction for the treatment of AC separation using a tendon graft and knot-hiding titanium clavicular implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with Rockwood grade III and V acromioclavicular (AC) separations were randomized into two groups. The primary outcome was whether taking the tendon graft through the coracoid risked a fracture. The following were secondary outcomes: follow-up of clavicular wound healing and Nottingham Clavicle score, Constant score, and Simple Shoulder Test results obtained preoperatively and 24 months postoperatively. The anteroposterior radiographic change between the clavicular and coracoid cortexes and the clavicular tunnel diameter was measured postoperatively and 24 months postoperatively. General patient satisfaction with the outcome (poor, fair, good, or excellent) was assessed 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: No coracoid fractures were detected. No issues in clavicular wound healing were detected. The mean Nottingham Clavicle score increased from a preoperative mean of 42.42 ± 13.42 to 95.31 ± 14.20 (P < 0.00). The Constant score increased from a preoperative mean of 50.81 ± 17.77 to 96.42 ± 11.51 (P < 0.001). The Simple Shoulder Test score increased from a preoperative mean of 7.50 ± 2.45 to 11.77 ± 1.18 (P < 0.001). The changes were significant. The coracoclavicular distance increased from 11.88 ± 4.00 to 14.19 ± 4.71 mm (P = 0.001), which was significant. The clavicular drill hole diameter increased from 5.5 to a mean of 8.00 ± 0.75 mm. General patient satisfaction was excellent. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences between the two groups. There were no implant related complications in the clavicular wound healing. The results support the notion that good results are achieved by reconstructing both the CC and AC ligaments with a tendon graft. STUDY REGISTRATION: This clinical trial was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov.

Comparison of the use of biocompatible materials and titanium in the treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures with a patient-specific plate: a finite element analysis study.

BACKGROUND: Clavicular midshaft fractures treated with titanium plates may encounter complications like implant failure. We assess if alternative biocompatible materials suchs as PLA, PLA/HA, PEEK offer comparable stability. Our study evaluates the biomechanical performance of these materials in surgical management of midshaft clavicle fractures. METHODS: We simulated a personalized fixation implant with four different materials and conducted finite element analysis in ANSYS to assess maximum von Mises stress (MvMs). RESULTS: The MvMs occurring on the plates, screws, clavicle, and fracture site were recorded. MvMs on titanium material at the 6th hole level (764.79 MPa) and the 6th screw level (503.38 MPa), with the highest stresses observed at 48.52 MPa on the lateral clavicle at the 1st hole level and 182.27 MPa on the medial clavicle at the 6th hole level. In PLA material analyses, the highest MvMs were observed at the 3rd hole level (340.6 MPa) and the 3rd screw level (157.83 MPa), with peak stresses at 379.63 MPa on the lateral clavicle fracture line and 505.44 MPa on the medial clavicle fracture line. In PLA/HA material analyses, the highest MvMs were at the 3rd hole (295.99 MPa) and 3rd screw (128.27 MPa), with peak stresses at 220.33 MPa on the lateral clavicle and 229.63 MPa on the medial clavicle fracture line. In PEEK material analyses, the highest MvMs were at the 3rd hole (234.74 MPa) and 6th screw (114.48 MPa), with peak stresses at 184.36 MPa on the lateral clavicle and 180.1 MPa on the medial clavicle. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that titanium material shows significantly higher stresses on plates and screws compared to those on the clavicle, suggesting a risk of implant failure. PLA and PLA/HA were inadequate for fixation. Although stress on the plate with PEEK material is higher than on the clavicle, it remains lower than titanium, indicating potential stability at fracture site. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.

Efficacy of intramedullary bridge fixation for midshaft clavicle fractures: a retrospective analysis of a novel technique.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy of a novel intramedullary fixation technique using the ortho-bridge system (OBS) for midshaft clavicle fractures. METHODS: A total of 63 patients were included in this study: 35 underwent plate internal fixation (LP group) and 28 underwent OBS intramedullary fixation (OBS group). Surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, fracture healing time, removal of the internal fixation agent, visual analog scale (VAS) score for shoulder pain, Constant-Murley shoulder score and complication occurrence were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Preoperative general data, such as sex, age and fracture type, were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, the OBS group exhibited better outcomes than the LP group exhibited in terms of surgical time, intraoperative blood loss and total incision length (P < 0.05). Additionally, the OBS group exhibited a significantly shorter fracture healing time and internal-fixation removal time than the LP group exhibited (P < 0.05). The VAS scores on postoperative day 1, week 1, month 1 and month 3 were lower in the OBS group than in the LP group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the Constant-Murley shoulder scores at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively were higher in the OBS group than in the LP group (P < 0.05), with no significant difference at 1 year after surgery (P > 0.05). None of the patients in the OBS group experienced scarring of the surgical incision, and 6 patients in the LP group experienced scarring of the surgical incision. Finally, the complication incidence in the OBS group was lower than that in the LP group. CONCLUSION: For midshaft clavicle fractures, OBS intramedullary fixation is better than locking-plate internal fixation because it led to less trauma, a faster recovery, better efficacy, and better esthetic outcomes and comfort. Therefore, this technique may have potential as a novel treatment for midshaft clavicle fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective observational study.

Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study of Nonoperative Versus Operative Treatment for High-Energy Midshaft Clavicle Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate if nonoperative or operative treatment of displaced clavicle fractures delivers reduced rates of nonunion and improved Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores. DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, observational. SETTING: Seven Level 1 Trauma Centers in the United States. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Adults with closed, displaced (100% displacement/shortened >1.5 cm) midshaft clavicle fractures (Orthopaedic Trauma Association 15.2) were treated nonoperatively, with plates and screw fixation, or with intramedullary fixation from 2003 to 2018. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: DASH scores (2, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months), reoperation, and nonunion were compared between the nonoperative, plate fixation, and intramedullary fixation groups. RESULTS: Four hundred twelve patients were enrolled, with 203 undergoing plate fixation, 26 receiving intramedullary fixation, and 183 treated nonoperatively. The average age of the nonoperative group was 40.1 (range 18-79) years versus 35.8 (range 18-74) in the plate group and 39.3 (range 19-56) in the intramedullary fixation group (P = 0.06). One hundred forty (76.5%) patients in the nonoperative group were male compared with 154 (75.9%) in the plate group and 18 (69.2%) in the intramedullary fixation group (P = 0.69). All groups showed similar DASH scores at 2 weeks, 12 months, and 24 months (P > 0.05). Plate fixation demonstrated better DASH scores (median = 20.8) than nonoperative (median = 28.3) at 6 weeks (P = 0.04). Intramedullary fixation had poorer DASH scores at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months than plate fixation and worse DASH scores than nonoperative at 6 months (P < 0.05). The nonunion rate for nonoperative treatment (14.6%) was significantly higher than the plate group (0%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Operative treatment of displaced clavicle fractures provided lower rates of nonunion than nonoperative treatment. Except at 6 weeks, no difference was observed in DASH scores between plate fixation and nonoperative treatment. Intramedullary fixation resulted in worse DASH scores than plate fixation at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months and worse DASH scores than nonoperative at 6 months. Implant removal was the leading reason for reoperation in the plate and intramedullary fixation groups, whereas surgery for nonunion was the primary reason for surgery in the nonoperative group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Nonoperative Versus Operative Treatment of Z-Type Comminuted Clavicle Fractures in Adolescents: A Prospective Substratified Cohort Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes of nonoperative and operative treatment of adolescents with comminuted "Z-type" midshaft clavicle fractures. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort. SETTING: Eight tertiary care pediatric centers. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients aged 10-18 years who were treated either operatively or nonoperatively for a diaphyseal clavicle fracture between 2013 and 2017 were screened/enrolled at the time of injury. The current subcohort analysis was derived from a larger adolescent clavicle study population of 907 patients. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND COMPARISONS: Complications and validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROs):(ASES, QuickDASH, Marx Shoulder Activity Score, EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, and patient satisfaction score) were compared between operative and nonoperative cohorts. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients (69 male [85.2%], 12 female; average age 15 years [11.1-18.7]; 78 with sports participation [96.2%]) were followed through bony healing and return to sports, while 59 patients (73%) completed 2-year follow-up with PROs, 26 of whom were treated nonoperatively and 33 treated operatively. All demographic and fracture characteristics were similar (P > 0.05) between the 2-year follow-up cohorts except for fracture shortening, which was greater in the operative cohort (23 vs. 29 mm, P = 0.01). After controlling for this potential confounder through both regression and propensity matched subgroup analysis, nonoperative versus operative cohorts showed no difference in rates of nonunion (0%), delayed union (0% vs. 2.3%, P = 1.0), symptomatic malunion (2.7% vs. 0%, P = 0.4), refracture (2.7% vs. 2.2%, P = 1.0), unexpected subsequent surgery (5.4% vs. 11.4%, P = 0.45), or clinically significant complications (5.4% vs. 16%, P = 0.17). There were no differences in any PROs between cohorts, both before and after controlling for the difference in fracture shortening (all P-values >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective comparison of complications and 2-year PROs in adolescents with comminuted Z-type clavicle fractures, nonoperative and operative treatment yielded similar outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Effect of Clavicular Tunnel Position on Reduction Loss in Patients with Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations Operated with a Single-Bundle Suspensory Loop Device.

OBJECTIVE: The treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations offers numerous options, and ongoing debates persist regarding their comparative effectiveness. Among these options, the suspensory loop device (SLD) is one of the most favored treatment modalities. Despite the observed high reduction loss rate associated with SLD, the treatment yields favorable clinical outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with acute type 3 and 5 ACJ dislocations who underwent open and arthroscopic procedures using a single-bundle SLD, and to evaluate the effect of clavicular tunnel position on reduction loss. METHODS: Thirty-seven eligible patients diagnosed with acute type 3 and type 5 ACJ dislocation who underwent open and arthroscopic surgery with a single-bundle SLD between January 2015 and March 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic data and radiological measurements including coracoclavicular (CC) interval, clavicle length (CL), and implant distance (ID) were recorded. The ID/CL ratio was calculated and a value between 0.17 and 0.24 was considered as "acceptable implant position". Reduction loss and other complications were noted. Patients were divided into two groups: open (Group 1) and arthroscopic (Group 2). Constant Murray Score (CMS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were used for clinical and functional outcomes. Non-parametric tests were used for statistical analysis of variables. RESULTS: The study included six females (16.2%) and 31 males (83.8%) with a mean age of 40.2 ± 14.7 years (range: 20-75). The mean follow-up period was 22.3 ± 16.7 months (range: 6-72). The average time from trauma to surgery was 6.3 ± 5.3 days (range: 1-18). At the last follow-up, the CMS was 89.3 ± 8.8 and the VAS score was 2.1 ± 0.9. The mean ID/CL ratio was 0.19 ± 0.1 and 19 patients (51.4%) were between 0.17 and 0.24. Reduction loss was observed in nine patients (24.3%). There were no significant differences between Group 1 and Group 2 regarding operation time (p = 0.998), ID/CL ratio (p = 0.442), reduction loss (p = 0.458), CMS (p = 0.325), and VAS score (p = 0.699). Of the 28 patients without reduction loss, 16 had an ID/CL ratio between 0.17 and 0.24 (p = 0.43). Furthermore, within the 0.17-0.24 interval, CMS was higher with an average of 91.8 ± 5.1 compared to the other intervals (p = 0.559). CONCLUSION: The clinical and functional outcomes of acute type 3 and type 5 ACJ dislocation operated open and arthroscopically with single-bundle SLD are similar and satisfactory. A clavicular tunnel position in the range of 0.17-0.24 (ID/CL ratio) is recommended to maintain postoperative reduction.

Management of thoracic outlet syndrome in patients with hemodialysis access.

Patients with threatened arteriovenous access are often found to have central venous stenoses at the ipsilateral costoclavicular junction, which may be resistant to endovascular intervention. Stenoses in this location may not resolve unless surgical decompression of thoracic outlet is performed to relieve the extrinsic compression on the subclavian vein. The authors reviewed the management of dialysis patients with central venous lesions at the thoracic outlet, as well as the role of surgical decompression with first-rib resection or claviculectomy for salvage of threatened, ipsilateral dialysis access.

The infraclavicular approach for venous thoracic outlet syndrome.

Venous thoracic outlet syndrome (vTOS) is an esoteric condition that presents in young, healthy adults. Treatment includes catheter-directed thrombolysis, followed by first-rib resection for decompression of the thoracic outlet. Various techniques for first-rib resection have been described with successful outcomes. The infraclavicular approach is well-suited to treat the most medial structures that are anatomically relevant for vTOS. A narrative review was conducted to specifically examine the literature on infraclavicular exposure for vTOS. The technique for this operation is described, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of this approach. The infraclavicular approach is a reasonable choice for definitive treatment of uncomplicated vTOS.

Superior versus anteroinferior plating for mid-shaft clavicle fractures: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Clavicle fractures represent 2.5-4% of all fractures observed in emergency services. 80% occurs in the middle third. Treatment by plating requires a higher level of evidence. OBJECTIVE: To compare the functional outcomes of mid-shaft clavicle fractures managed with superior plating compared to anteroinferior plating. TRIAL DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, parallel, superiority clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with fractures of the clavicles AO15B1 and AO15B2 were studied. Patients were randomized to be treated with either 3.5 mm superior or anteroinferior plating. A rehabilitation program was designed for both groups. The primary outcome measure was the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score; secondary outcomes included pain, union rate, and complication rates. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were studied and were eligible for analysis. Significant differences were found in the function assessed with the DASH score at 30 days for the superior plating compared with anteroinferior (43.74 vs. 29.26, respectively, p = 0.027), 60 days (23.97 vs. 11.18, p = 0.021), and 90 days (9.52 vs. 3.5, p = 0.016). One loosening with superficial infection was found with superior plating. CONCLUSIONS: Using an anteroinferior reconstruction plate in diaphyseal fractures offers better functional results than the upper plate in patients with fractures of the middle third of the clavicle.

ANTECEDENTES: Las fracturas de clavícula comprenden el 2.5-4% de todas las fracturas observadas en los servicios de emergencia. El 80% se presentan en el tercio medio. La posición de la placa como tratamiento requiere mayor nivel de evidencia. OBJETIVO: Comparar los resultados funcionales de las fracturas diafisarias de clavícula manejadas con placa superior versus placa anteroinferior. MÉTODO: Ensayo clínico aleatorizado, doble ciego, paralelo, de superioridad. Se estudiaron pacientes con fractura diafisaria de clavícula AO15B1 y AO15B2. Se manejaron con placa de reconstrucción de 3.5 mm colocada en forma superior o anteroinferior. Se diseñó un programa de rehabilitación para ambos grupos. El resultado primario fue medido con el cuestionario DASH y los resultados secundarios incluyeron dolor, presencia de consolidación y complicaciones. RESULTADOS: Fueron elegibles para análisis 28 pacientes. Se encontraron diferencias significativas de la escala DASH a los 30 días para la maniobra superior comparada con la inferior (43.74 vs. 29.26, respectivamente; p = 0.027), a los 60 días (23.97 vs. 11.18; p = 0.021) y a los 90 días (9.52 vs. 3.5; p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONES: El uso de placa de reconstrucción anteroinferior en las fracturas diafisarias ofrece mejores resultados funcionales en comparación con la placa superior en pacientes con fracturas de tercio medio de clavícula.

Surgical approach through the anterior scalene muscle resection for invasive tumours in the supraclavicular fossa (with video).

BACKGROUND: The supraclavicular fossa contains many vital organs to be preserved, such as the brachial plexus, subclavian artery and vertebral artery. Various surgical methods have been reported. However, no well-standardized surgical procedure has been established. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2020, we performed 28 surgical treatments of the superior mediastinum and supraclavicular fossa. Of these, we retrospectively reviewed seven cases of supraclavicular invasion using a unified surgical technique in which the anterior scalene muscle was resected, and the inter-scalene triangle was approached. RESULTS: We performed claviculectomy in four cases and a transmanubrial approach in three cases. In all cases, by resecting the anterior scalene muscle, the brachial plexus, subclavian artery and vertebral artery were preserved. There were no critical postoperative complications other than tracheostomy and lymphatic leakage. Median bleeding amount and operative time were 438 (range; 76-1144) ml and 328 (range; 246-615) minutes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The anterior scalene muscle resection method might be a safe and standardized method for preserving the brachial plexus, subclavian artery and vertebral artery.