Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 871
Filtrar
1.
Lancet Respir Med ; 12(10): 787-798, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39270696

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic lung infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa is associated with increased exacerbations and mortality in people with bronchiectasis. The PROMIS-I and PROMIS-II trials investigated the efficacy and safety of 12-months of inhaled colistimethate sodium delivered via the I-neb. METHODS: Two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of twice per day colistimethate sodium versus placebo were conducted in patients with bronchiectasis with P aeruginosa and a history of at least two exacerbations requiring oral antibiotics or one requiring intravenous antibiotics in the previous year in hospitals in Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, the UK, and the USA. Randomisation was conducted through an interactive web response system and stratified by site and long term use of macrolides. Masking was achieved by providing colistimethate sodium and placebo in identical vials. After random assignment, study visits were scheduled for 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months (the end of the treatment period); and telephone calls were scheduled for 7 days after random assignment and 2 weeks after the end of treatment. The primary endpoint was the mean annual exacerbation rate. These trials are registered with EudraCT: number 2015-002743-33 (for PROMIS-I) and 2016-004558-13 (for PROMIS-II), and are now completed. FINDINGS: 377 patients were randomly assigned in PROMIS-I (177 to colistimethate sodium and 200 to placebo; in the modified intention-to-treat population, 176 were in the colistimethate sodium group and 197 were in the placebo group) between June 6, 2017, and April 8, 2020. The annual exacerbation rate was 0·58 in the colistimethate sodium group versus 0·95 in the placebo group (rate ratio 0·61; 95% CI 0·46-0·82; p=0·0010). 287 patients were randomly assigned in PROMIS-II (152 were assigned to colistimethate sodium and 135 were assigned to placebo, in the modified intention-to-treat population), between Feb 12, 2018, and Oct 22, 2021. PROMIS-II was then prematurely terminated due to the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. No significant difference was observed in the annual exacerbation rate between the colistimethate sodium and placebo groups (0·89 vs 0·89; rate ratio 1·00; 95% CI 0·75-1·35; p=0·98). No major safety issues were identified. The overall frequency of adverse events was 142 (81%) patients in the colistimethate sodium group versus 159 (81%) patients in the placebo group in PROMIS-I, and 123 (81%) patients versus 104 (77%) patients in PROMIS-II. There were no deaths related to study treatment. INTERPRETATION: The data from PROMIS-I suggest a clinically important benefit of colistimethate sodium delivered via the I-neb adaptive aerosol delivery system in patients with bronchiectasis and P aeruginosa infection. These results were not replicated in PROMIS-II, which was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and prematurely terminated. FUNDING: Zambon.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Bronquiectasia , Colistina , Infecciones por Pseudomonas , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Humanos , Bronquiectasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego , Masculino , Femenino , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Administración por Inhalación , Colistina/análogos & derivados , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Colistina/efectos adversos , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Clin Transl Sci ; 17(7): e13870, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38952168

RESUMEN

The AIDA randomized clinical trial found no significant difference in clinical failure or survival between colistin monotherapy and colistin-meropenem combination therapy in carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections. The aim of this reverse translational study was to integrate all individual preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) data from the AIDA trial in a pharmacometric framework to explore whether individualized predictions of bacterial burden were associated with the trial outcomes. The compiled dataset included for each of the 207 patients was (i) information on the infecting Acinetobacter baumannii isolate (minimum inhibitory concentration, checkerboard assay data, and fitness in a murine model), (ii) colistin plasma concentrations and colistin and meropenem dosing history, and (iii) disease scores and demographics. The individual information was integrated into PKPD models, and the predicted change in bacterial count at 24 h for each patient, as well as patient characteristics, was correlated with clinical outcomes using logistic regression. The in vivo fitness was the most important factor for change in bacterial count. A model-predicted growth at 24 h of ≥2-log10 (164/207) correlated positively with clinical failure (adjusted odds ratio, aOR = 2.01). The aOR for one unit increase of other significant predictors were 1.24 for SOFA score, 1.19 for Charlson comorbidity index, and 1.01 for age. This study exemplifies how preclinical and clinical anti-infective PKPD data can be integrated through pharmacodynamic modeling and identify patient- and pathogen-specific factors related to clinical outcomes - an approach that may improve understanding of study outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Acinetobacter baumannii , Antibacterianos , Meropenem , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Humanos , Acinetobacter baumannii/efectos de los fármacos , Acinetobacter baumannii/aislamiento & purificación , Meropenem/farmacocinética , Meropenem/administración & dosificación , Meropenem/farmacología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Masculino , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Colistina/farmacocinética , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Animales , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ratones , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/microbiología , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Modelos Biológicos
3.
Pharmacotherapy ; 44(8): 631-641, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39046197

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Polymyxins have re-emerged as a last-resort therapeutic option for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Nephrotoxicity induced by polymyxins is a significant limitation of its use in the clinic. Polymyxin B and colistin sulfate are two widely used active formulations of polymyxins. However, there is a lack of studies conducting a comparative assessment of nephrotoxicity between the two formulations. This study aimed to compare the nephrotoxicity of polymyxin B and colistin sulfate in critically ill patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among critically ill patients who received intravenous polymyxin B or colistin sulfate for over 48 h from January 2017 to January 2024. The primary outcome was the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with polymyxins, and the secondary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Additionally, the risk factors of polymyxins-induced AKI and 30-day all-cause mortality were identified by Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 473 patients were included in this study. The overall incidence of AKI was significantly higher in patients who received polymyxin B compared to those who received colistin sulfate in the unmatched cohort (20.8% vs. 9.0%, p = 0.002) and in the propensity score matching cohort (21.1% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.004), respectively. However, there was no significant difference in 30-day all-cause mortality between the two groups. Polymyxin type, septic shock, and concomitant use of vasopressors were identified as independent risk factors for polymyxin-induced AKI. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of AKI was higher among patients who received polymyxin B compared to those treated with colistin sulfate. However, there was no significant difference in 30-day all-cause mortality between the two groups. Further prospective, multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate these findings.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Antibacterianos , Colistina , Enfermedad Crítica , Polimixina B , Humanos , Colistina/efectos adversos , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Polimixina B/efectos adversos , Polimixina B/administración & dosificación , Polimixina B/uso terapéutico , Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamente , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Administración Intravenosa , Incidencia , Factores de Riesgo
4.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 18(7): 1050-1057, 2024 Jul 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39078788

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of colistin sulfate (CS) with polymyxin B sulfate (PMB) in the treatment of pneumonia induced by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). METHODOLOGY: Patients diagnosed with pneumonia caused by CR-GNB and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) from January 2020 to September 2022 were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into the CS group and the PMB group according to their medication regimens. Group-wise demographic data, clinical efficacy, prognosis, and adverse events were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients (68 in the CS group and 52 in the PMB group) with pneumonia were included in the study. The majority of the pathogens were CR-Acinetobacter baumannii, followed by CR-Klebsiella pneumoniae, and CR-Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The clinical response rates in the CS and PMB groups after treatment were 62.0% and 65.4%, bacterial clearances were 44.0% and 36.5%, 28-day mortality rates were 16.0% and 13.5%, respectively; no significant differences between the two treatments were found. Nevertheless, the adverse effects were significantly less common in the CS group than in the PMB group, especially when treatments were administered intravenously. CONCLUSIONS: CS, a novel polymyxin E formulation, is as effective as PMB in treating pneumonia induced by CR-GNB while causing less side effects.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Colistina , Neumonía Bacteriana , Polimixina B , Humanos , Polimixina B/uso terapéutico , Polimixina B/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Colistina/efectos adversos , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Bacteriana/microbiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Acinetobacter baumannii/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos
5.
Poult Sci ; 103(9): 104018, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39043027

RESUMEN

Colistin (CST) is considered as "agent of last resort" against gram-negative bacteria as feed additive. Its clinical effectiveness has reduced since the emergence of mcr-1 gene in ducks. Isopropoxy benzene guanidine (IBG), a new guanidine derivative, showed positive effects on improving animal weights and alleviating intestinal pathogens, therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of this compound supplement with CST in ducks and explore the possibilities in feed additive. A total of fifteen duck-origin Escherichia coli carrying the mcr-1 gene were included in this study. A checkerboard microdilution assay was used to evaluate the in vitro antibacterial activity of IBG combined with CST against mcr-1-positive E. coli. A 3-by-2 time-kill array of IBG (16, 32, and 64 µg/mL) and CST (1/2 MIC and 1/4 MIC) over 24 hours was utilized to characterize the activity of the agents alone and in combination against E. coli strain 1 in vitro. The intestinal colonization model was used to evaluate the in vivo effect of IBG combined with CST. These results indicated that the combination of IBG plus CST showed a synergistic effect against all clinical isolates (FICI < 0.5). The bacterial burden was reduced by more than 2 log10 CFU/mL when E. coli strain 1 was tested with 1/2 MIC CST plus 64 µg/mL IBG for 24 h. Further experiments in vivo demonstrated that the CST combined with IBG was able to increase duck weights, reduced intestinal pathogenic E. coli and showed a synergistic antibacterial effect. Combination of CST (4 mg/kg b.w.) plus IBG (32 or 64 mg/kg b.w.) achieved 1.84 to 3.29 log10 CFU/g killing after 7 d of therapy, which was significantly different from that in the challenge control group (p<0.05). In summary, our study demonstrated the potential use of IBG as feed additive for veterinary purposes in ducks and provided new insights into overcoming resistance in the future.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Colistina , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Patos , Infecciones por Escherichia coli , Proteínas de Escherichia coli , Escherichia coli , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral , Animales , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Colistina/farmacología , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/veterinaria , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/tratamiento farmacológico , Proteínas de Escherichia coli/genética , Proteínas de Escherichia coli/metabolismo , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/microbiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/tratamiento farmacológico , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/veterinaria , Enfermedades Intestinales/veterinaria , Enfermedades Intestinales/microbiología , Enfermedades Intestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Guanidina/farmacología , Alimentación Animal/análisis
6.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 16444, 2024 07 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39013979

RESUMEN

Colistin is a polymyxin antibiotic currently experiencing renewed clinical interest due to its efficacy in the treatment of multidrug resistant (MDR) bacterial infections. The frequent onset of acute dose-dependent kidney injury, with the potential of leading to long-term renal damage, has limited its use and hampered adequate dosing regimens, increasing the risk of suboptimal plasma concentrations during treatment. The mechanism of colistin-induced renal toxicity has been postulated to stem from mitochondrial damage, yet there is no direct evidence of colistin acting as a mitochondrial toxin. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether colistin can directly induce mitochondrial toxicity and, if so, uncover the underlying molecular mechanism. We found that colistin leads to a rapid permeability transition of mitochondria isolated from mouse kidney that was fully prevented by co-incubation of the mitochondria with desensitizers of the mitochondrial transition pore cyclosporin A or L-carnitine. The protective effect of L-carnitine was confirmed in experiments in primary cultured mouse tubular cells. Consistently, the relative risk of colistin-induced kidney damage, calculated based on histological analysis as well as by the early marker of tubular kidney injury, Kim-1, was halved under co-administration with L-carnitine in vivo. Notably, L-carnitine neither affected the pharmacokinetics of colistin nor its antimicrobial activity against relevant bacterial strains. In conclusion, colistin targets the mitochondria and induces permeability transition thereof. L-carnitine prevents colistin-induced permeability transition in vitro. Moreover, L-carnitine co-administration confers partial nephroprotection in mice treated with colistin, without interfering with its pharmacokinetics and antibacterial activity.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Antibacterianos , Carnitina , Colistina , Mitocondrias , Animales , Colistina/efectos adversos , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Lesión Renal Aguda/prevención & control , Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamente , Lesión Renal Aguda/metabolismo , Carnitina/farmacología , Carnitina/administración & dosificación , Ratones , Mitocondrias/efectos de los fármacos , Mitocondrias/metabolismo , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Poro de Transición de la Permeabilidad Mitocondrial/metabolismo , Riñón/efectos de los fármacos , Riñón/metabolismo , Riñón/patología , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Ciclosporina
7.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 79(8): 1919-1928, 2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38946304

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity (PIN) is a major safety concern and challenge in clinical practice, which limits the clinical use of polymyxins. This study aims to investigate the risk factors and to develop a scoring tool for the early prediction of PIN. METHODS: Data on critically ill patients who received intravenous polymyxin B or colistin sulfate for over 24 h were collected. Logistic regression with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used to identify variables that are associated with outcomes. The eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) classifier algorithm was used to further visualize factors with significant differences. A prediction model for PIN was developed through binary logistic regression analysis and the model was assessed by temporal validation and external validation. Finally, a risk-scoring system was developed based on the prediction model. RESULTS: Of 508 patients, 161 (31.6%) patients developed PIN. Polymyxin type, loading dose, septic shock, concomitant vasopressors and baseline blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level were identified as significant predictors of PIN. All validation exhibited great discrimination, with the AUC of 0.742 (95% CI: 0.696-0.787) for internal validation, of 0.708 (95% CI: 0.605-0.810) for temporal validation and of 0.874 (95% CI: 0.759-0.989) for external validation, respectively. A simple risk-scoring tool was developed with a total risk score ranging from -3 to 4, corresponding to a risk of PIN from 0.79% to 81.24%. CONCLUSIONS: This study established a prediction model for PIN. Before using polymyxins, the simple risk-scoring tool can effectively identify patients at risk of developing PIN within a range of 7% to 65%.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Anciano , Factores de Riesgo , Polimixina B/efectos adversos , Polimixina B/administración & dosificación , Proyectos Piloto , Enfermedad Crítica , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Polimixinas/efectos adversos , Colistina/efectos adversos , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Modelos Logísticos , Adulto , Enfermedades Renales/inducido químicamente
8.
J Med Microbiol ; 73(6)2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38842435

RESUMEN

Introduction. Colistin (polymyxin E) has emerged as a last-resort treatment option for multidrug-resistant infections.Hypothesis/Gap Statement. Studies on the use, safety and efficacy of colistin in South Africa are limited.Aim. This study aims to describe the use of colistin and its clinical outcomes at a tertiary public hospital in South Africa.Methodology. We conducted a retrospective review of adult and paediatric patients who received parenteral colistin between 2015 and 2019.Results. A total of 69 patients (26 adults, 13 children and 30 neonates) were reviewed. Acinetobacter baumannii was the most common causative pathogen isolated (70.1 %). Colistin was predominately used to treat septicaemia (75.4 %). It was primarily administered as definitive therapy (71.0 %) and as monotherapy (56.5 %). It was used in 11.5 % of adults with infections susceptible to other antibiotics. Loading doses of intravenous colistin were administered in only 15 (57.7 %) adult patients. Neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity occurred in 5.8 % and 43.5 % of patients, respectively. Clinical cure was achieved in 37 (53.6 %) patients. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, adults [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 25.54; 95 % CI, 2.73-238.65; P < 0.01] and children (aOR, 8.56; 95 % CI, 1.06-69.10; P < 0.05) had higher odds of death than neonates.Conclusion. The study identified significant stewardship opportunities to improve colistin prescription and administration. Achieving optimal patient outcomes necessitates a multidisciplinary approach and vigilant monitoring of colistin use.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Colistina , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Sudáfrica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Adulto , Masculino , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Lactante , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recién Nacido , Niño , Preescolar , Acinetobacter baumannii/efectos de los fármacos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Anciano , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/microbiología
9.
Eur J Pediatr ; 183(8): 3407-3415, 2024 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767692

RESUMEN

This retrospective study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of colistin used in combination therapy for treating nosocomial bloodstream infections caused by multi-drug resistant gram-negative pathogens in pediatric patients. Patients aged between 1 month and 18 years consecutively hospitalized with healthcare-associated bloodstream infections necessitating the administration of intravenous colistin at Dr. Sami Ulus Training and Research Hospital between January 2015 and January 2020 were included in the study. Patient-specific detailed clinical information, prognoses, and laboratory findings on days 1, 3, and 7 of colistin treatment were obtained from medical records. The study included 45 pediatric patients receiving intravenous colistin; 26 (57.8%) were male and 19 (42.2%) were female, with a median age of 18 months. While the clinical response was observed at 82.2% and microbiological response at 91.1% with colistin treatment, two patients (4.4%) discontinued treatment due to side effects without assessing treatment response. The most common adverse effect associated with the use of colistin was nephrotoxicity, which occurred in eight patients (17.8%). Among these patients, only one had pre-existing chronic kidney failure.    Conclusion: Colistin used in combination therapy may be effective and safe for treating nosocomial infections caused by multi-drug resistant gram-negative bacteria in pediatric patients, who often have high mortality rates and limited treatment options. What is Known: • Colistin is an antibacterial agent used in the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) and is associated with significant adverse effects such as nephrotoxicity. • The increasing prevalence of hospital-acquired infections has led to the expanded use of colistin in clinical practice. What is New: • The study demonstrates a high clinical and microbiological response rate to combination therapy with colistin in the treatment of infections caused by MDR-GNB. • The study highlights the importance of monitoring nephrotoxicity in pediatric patients receiving colistin, showing that these effects can be reversible after treatment cessation.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia , Colistina , Infección Hospitalaria , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Colistina/efectos adversos , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 14: 1352339, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38808066

RESUMEN

Antibiotic drug combination therapy is critical for the successful treatment of infections caused by multidrug resistant pathogens. We investigated the efficacy of ß-lactam and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations with other antibiotics, against the hypervirulent, ceftazidime/avibactam resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Liverpool epidemic strain (LES) B58. Although minimum inhibitory concentrations in vitro differed by up to eighty-fold between standard and host-mimicking media, combinatorial effects only marginally changed between conditions for some combinations. Effective combinations in vitro were further tested in a chronic, high-density murine infection model. Colistin and azithromycin demonstrated combinatorial effects with ceftazidime and ceftazidime/avibactam both in vitro and in vivo. Conversely, while tobramycin and tigecycline exhibited strong synergy in vitro, this effect was not observed in vivo. Our approach of using host-mimicking conditions and a sophisticated animal model to evaluate drug synergy against bacterial pathogens represents a promising approach. This methodology may offer insights into the prediction of combination therapy outcomes and the identification of potential treatment failures.


Asunto(s)
Absceso , Antibacterianos , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Infecciones por Pseudomonas , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Animales , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Ratones , Absceso/tratamiento farmacológico , Absceso/microbiología , Combinación de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Femenino , Ceftazidima/farmacología , Ceftazidima/uso terapéutico , Azitromicina/farmacología , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , Azitromicina/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/farmacología , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/uso terapéutico , Colistina/farmacología , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Colistina/administración & dosificación
11.
Int J Pharm ; 658: 124208, 2024 Jun 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38723731

RESUMEN

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), a predominant pathogen in lung infections, poses significant challenges due to its biofilm formation, which is the primary cause of chronic and recalcitrant pulmonary infections. Bacteria within these biofilms exhibit heightened resistance to antibiotics compared to their planktonic counterparts, and their secreted toxins exacerbate lung infections. Diverging from traditional antibacterial therapy for biofilm eradication, this study introduces a novel dry powder inhalation containing muco-inert ciprofloxacin and colistin co-encapsulated liposomes (Cipro-Col-Lips) prepared using ultrasonic spray freeze drying (USFD) technique. This USFD dry powder is designed to efficiently deliver muco-inert Cipro-Col-Lips to the lungs. Once deposited, the liposomes rapidly diffuse into the airway mucus, reaching the biofilm sites. The muco-inert Cipro-Col-Lips neutralize the biofilm-secreted toxins and simultaneously trigger the release of their therapeutic payload, exerting a synergistic antibiofilm effect. Our results demonstrated that the optimal USFD liposomal dry powder formulation exhibited satisfactory in vitro aerosol performance in terms of fine particle fraction (FPF) of 44.44 ± 0.78 %, mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of 4.27 ± 0.21 µm, and emitted dose (ED) of 99.31 ± 3.31 %. The muco-inert Cipro-Col-Lips effectively penetrate the airway mucus and accumulate at the biofilm site, neutralizing toxins and safeguarding lung cells. The triggered release of ciprofloxacin and colistin works synergistically to reduce the biofilm's antibiotic resistance, impede the development of antibiotic resistance, and eliminate 99.99 % of biofilm-embedded bacteria, including persister bacteria. Using a PA-beads induced biofilm-associated lung infection mouse model, the in vivo efficacy of this liposomal dry powder aerosol was tested, and the results demonstrated that this liposomal dry powder aerosol achieved a 99.7 % reduction in bacterial colonization, and significantly mitigated inflammation and pulmonary fibrosis. The USFD dry powder inhalation containing muco-inert Cipro-Col-Lips emerges as a promising therapeutic strategy for treating PA biofilm-associated lung infections.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Biopelículas , Ciprofloxacina , Colistina , Inhaladores de Polvo Seco , Liposomas , Infecciones por Pseudomonas , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Ciprofloxacina/administración & dosificación , Ciprofloxacina/farmacología , Ciprofloxacina/química , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/fisiología , Biopelículas/efectos de los fármacos , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Colistina/farmacología , Administración por Inhalación , Animales , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/química , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Ratones , Aerosoles , Pulmón/microbiología , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Polvos , Femenino , Tamaño de la Partícula
12.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 64(1): 107190, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38697579

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) have been reported increasingly over the past few years. Many in-vivo and in-vitro studies have suggested a possible role of intravenous fosfomycin for the treatment of CRAB infections. METHODS: This multi-centre, retrospective study included patients treated with intravenous fosfomycin for severe infections caused by CRAB admitted consecutively to four hospitals in Italy from December 2017 to December 2022. The primary goal of the study was to evaluate the risk factors associated with 30-day mortality in the study population. A propensity score matched analysis was added to the model. RESULTS: One hundred and two patients with severe infections caused by CRAB treated with an intravenous fosfomycin-containing regimen were enrolled in this study. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) was diagnosed in 59% of patients, primary bacteraemia in 22% of patients, and central-venous-catheter-related infection in 16% of patients. All patients were treated with a regimen containing intravenous fosfomycin, mainly in combination with cefiderocol (n=54), colistin (n=48) or ampicillin/sulbactam (n=18). Forty-eight (47%) patients died within 30 days. Fifty-eight (57%) patients experienced clinical therapeutic failure. Cox regression analysis showed that diabetes, primary bacteraemia and a colistin-containing regimen were independently associated with 30-day mortality, whereas adequate source control of infection, early 24-h active in-vitro therapy, and a cefiderocol-containing regimen were associated with survival. A colistin-based regimen, A. baumannii colonization and primary bacteraemia were independently associated with clinical failure. Conversely, adequate source control of infection, a cefiderocol-containing regimen, and early 24-h active in-vitro therapy were associated with clinical success. CONCLUSIONS: Different antibiotic regimens containing fosfomycin in combination can be used for treatment of severe infections caused by CRAB.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Acinetobacter , Acinetobacter baumannii , Administración Intravenosa , Antibacterianos , Carbapenémicos , Fosfomicina , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador , Sulbactam , Humanos , Fosfomicina/uso terapéutico , Fosfomicina/administración & dosificación , Acinetobacter baumannii/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/mortalidad , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/microbiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Sulbactam/uso terapéutico , Sulbactam/administración & dosificación , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/microbiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/mortalidad , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Italia , Ampicilina/uso terapéutico , Ampicilina/administración & dosificación , Cefiderocol , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Quimioterapia Combinada , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple
13.
BMC Pulm Med ; 24(1): 213, 2024 May 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698403

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) presents a significant challenge in intensive care units (ICUs). Nebulized antibiotics, particularly colistin and tobramycin, are commonly prescribed for VAP patients. However, the appropriateness of using inhaled antibiotics for VAP remains a subject of debate among experts. This study aims to provide updated insights on the efficacy of adjunctive inhaled colistin and tobramycin through a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A thorough search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, COCHRANE Central, and clinical trials databases ( www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ) from inception to June 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting specific inclusion criteria were selected for analysis. These criteria included mechanically ventilated patients diagnosed with VAP, intervention with inhaled Colistin and Tobramycin compared to intravenous antibiotics, and reported outcomes such as clinical cure, microbiological eradication, mortality, or adverse events. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 106 records, from which only seven RCTs fulfilled the predefined inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed a higher likelihood of achieving both clinical and microbiological cure in the groups receiving tobramycin or colistin compared to the control group. The relative risk (RR) for clinical cure was 1.23 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.45), and for microbiological cure, it was 1.64 (95% CI: 1.31, 2.06). However, there were no significant differences in mortality or the probability of adverse events between the groups. CONCLUSION: Adjunctive inhaled tobramycin or colistin may have a positive impact on the clinical and microbiological cure rates of VAP. However, the overall quality of evidence is low, indicating a high level of uncertainty. These findings underscore the need for further rigorous and well-designed studies to enhance the quality of evidence and provide more robust guidance for clinical decision-making in the management of VAP.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Colistina , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador , Tobramicina , Humanos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/tratamiento farmacológico , Tobramicina/administración & dosificación , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Administración por Inhalación , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Respiración Artificial
14.
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv ; 37(3): 115-124, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38563793

RESUMEN

Introduction: During mechanical ventilation (MV), inspired gases require heat and humidification. However, such conditions may be associated with reduced aerosol delivery efficiency. The practice of turning off heated humidification before nebulization and the impact of nebulization on humidity in a dry ventilator circuit remain topics of debate. This study aimed to assess the effect of turning off heated humidification on inhaled dose and humidity with nebulizer use during adult MV. Methods: A bronchodilator (albuterol) and two antibiotics (Colistimethate sodium and Amikacin sulfate) were nebulized with a vibrating mesh nebulizer placed at the humidifier inlet and in the inspiratory limb at the Y-piece. Additionally, albuterol was nebulized using a jet nebulizer in both placements. Aerosol particle size distribution was determined through a cascade impactor. Absolute humidity (AH) and temperature of inspired gases were determined with anemometer/hygrometers before, during, and after nebulization, before, during, and up to 60 minutes after interrupting active humidification. Aerosol collected on a filter distal to the endotracheal tube and on impactor stages were eluted and assayed by spectrophotometry. Results: The inhaled dose was greater when both nebulizers were placed at the humidifier inlet than the inspiratory limb at the Y-piece. Irrespective of the nebulizer types and placements, the inhaled dose either decreased or showed no significant change after the humidifier was turned off. The aerosol particle size ranged from 1.1 to 2.7 µm. With interruption of active humidification, humidity of inspired gas quickly dropped below recommended levels, and nebulization in dry ventilator circuit produced an AH between 10 and 20 mgH2O/L, lower than the recommended minimum of 30 mgH2O/L. Conclusion: Interrupting active humidification during MV before nebulization did not improve aerosol delivery efficiency for bronchodilator or antibiotics, but did reduce humidity below recommended levels.


Asunto(s)
Aerosoles , Albuterol , Antibacterianos , Broncodilatadores , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos , Calor , Humedad , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Tamaño de la Partícula , Respiración Artificial , Temperatura , Albuterol/administración & dosificación , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Administración por Inhalación , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Amicacina/administración & dosificación , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Diseño de Equipo , Humidificadores , Factores de Tiempo
15.
J Arthroplasty ; 39(9): 2280-2284, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38640967

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: One of the most severe complications of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is prosthetic joint infection. Currently, the use of antibiotic-loaded cement for the prevention of infection is still controversial. The aim of the present study was to evaluate if the use of antibiotic-loaded cement reduces the infection rate in primary TKA in long-term follow-up (more than 5 years average follow-up). METHODS: This study is the follow-up extension of a prospective randomized study, with 2,893 cemented TKA performed between 2005 and 2010 at our institution. There were 2 different cohorts depending on which bone cement was used: without antibiotics (control group) or those loaded with erythromycin and colistin (study group). All patients received the same systemic prophylactic antibiotics. The patients were followed for a minimum of twelve months. The diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection was done according to Zimmerli criteria. RESULTS: In 1,452 patients, the prosthetic components were fixed using bone cement without antibiotics, whereas in 1,441 patients, bone cement was loaded with erythromycin and colistin. Both groups were comparable in terms of all the possible risk factors studied. We found a total of 53 deep infections, with a mean rate of 1.8%. There were no differences between the groups as to whether bone cement with or without antibiotics had been used (P = .58). The average duration of follow-up was 8.7 years. In terms of prosthetic revision due to aseptic loosening, there were no differences between groups (P = .32), with 33 revision arthroplasties in the control group and 37 in the study group. Moreover, we analyzed the erythromycin resistance rate, with no differences between both groups (P = .6). CONCLUSIONS: The use of erythromycin and colistin-loaded bone cement in TKA did not lead to a decrease in the rate of infection in long-term follow-up, a finding that suggests that its use would not be indicated in the general population.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Cementos para Huesos , Colistina , Eritromicina , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Eritromicina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/prevención & control , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Masculino , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Incidencia , Prótesis de la Rodilla/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos
16.
J Infect Public Health ; 17(5): 843-853, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38554590

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Colistin is a viable option for multidrug resistant gram-negative bacteria emerged from inappropriate antibiotic use. Nonetheless, suboptimal colistin concentrations and nephrotoxicity risks hinder its clinical use. Thus, the aim of this study is to investigate clinical outcomes in correlation with pharmacokinetic differences and infection types in critically ill patients on intravenous colistin methanesulfornate sodium (CMS). METHODS: A systematic literature search of Embase, Google Scholars, and PubMed was performed to identify clinical trials evaluating pharmacokinetic parameters along with clinical outcomes of CMS treatment from inception to July 2023. The pooled analyses of clinical impact of CMS on nephrotoxicity, mortality, clinical cure, and colistin concentration at steady state (Css,avg) were performed. This study was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD 42023456120). RESULTS: Total of 695 critically ill patients from 17 studies were included. The mortality was substantially lower in clinically cured patients (OR 0.05; 95% CI 0.02 - 0.14), whereas the mortality rate was statistically insignificant between nephrotoxic and non-nephrotoxic patients. Inter-patient variability of pharmacokinetic parameters of CMS and colistin was observed in critically ill patients. The standard mean differences of Css,avg were statistically insignificant between clinically cure and clinically failure groups (standard mean difference (SMD) -0.25; 95% CI -0.69 - 0.19) and between nephrotoxic and non-nephrotoxic groups (SMD 0.67; 95% CI -0.27-1.61). The clinical cure rate is substantially lower in pneumonia patients (OR 0.09; 95% CI 0.01 - 0.56), and pharmacokinetic parameters pertaining to microbiological cure were different among strains. CONCLUSION: The mortality rate was substantially lower in clinically cured patients with CMS. However, no significant differences in Css,avg of colistin were examined to determine the impact of pharmacokinetic differences on clinical outcomes including mortality rate and nephrotoxicity risk. Nevertheless, the clinical cure rate is substantially lower in patients with respiratory infection than patients with urinary tract infection.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Colistina , Enfermedad Crítica , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Colistina/farmacocinética , Colistina/efectos adversos , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Colistina/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/mortalidad , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos
17.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 72(Suppl 4): S696-S701, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38389253

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of McCarey-Kaufman (MK) medium supplemented with colistin and amphotericin B in inhibiting the growth of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas (P.) aeruginosa , using an ex vivo experimental model with human donor corneas. METHODS: Cadaveric human corneas deemed unsuitable for corneal transplantation were obtained, and MK media were supplemented with colistin and amphotericin B. Multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa was cultured and used to infect the human donor corneas ex vivo . Infected corneas were placed in the MK media with additional antibiotics (colistin and amphotericin B) and the standard MK media, which served as the control arm for comparison. Corneal opacity due to infiltration and quantitative analysis of colony-forming units (CFUs) were assessed. The viability of the corneal endothelium was assessed using trypan blue staining. RESULTS: Corneas incubated in MK media supplemented with additional antibiotics showed less corneal opacification compared with those in standard MK media at both 48- and 96-hour (hr) time points. Quantitative analysis revealed a lower bacterial load and a significant reduction in CFU in the corneas incubated in MK media with additional antibiotics compared with the control group. At 48 hrs, there was 84% ( P value = 0.024) reduction in bacterial load, and at 96 hr, a 53% ( P value = 0.016) reduction was observed in comparison with those placed in standard MK media. The trypan blue staining tests revealed that the extent of endothelial cell loss in corneas incubated in supplemented MK media was comparable to the ones in standard MK media. CONCLUSION: The addition of colistin and amphotericin B to MK media demonstrated efficacy in inhibiting the growth of multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa in an ex vivo cornea infection model. The supplemented media had no detrimental effect on the corneal endothelium. The findings suggest that supplementing the MK media with these broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents may help mitigate the risk of postoperative donor-related infection in the recipients by reducing and containing the load of microbial contamination in donor corneas.


Asunto(s)
Anfotericina B , Antibacterianos , Colistina , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo , Infecciones por Pseudomonas , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Donantes de Tejidos , Colistina/farmacología , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/microbiología , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/prevención & control , Anfotericina B/farmacología , Anfotericina B/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Medios de Cultivo , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Cadáver , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Córnea/microbiología
18.
J Cyst Fibros ; 23(3): 499-505, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38360460

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prescribers have an increasing range of inhaled antimicrobial formulations to choose from when prescribing both eradication and chronic suppression regimens in cystic fibrosis (CF). This study aimed to investigate the decision-making process behind prescribing of inhaled antimicrobials for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed using Microsoft Forms and then forwarded to 57 Principal Investigators (PIs), at each of the CF centres within the European Cystic Fibrosis Society-Clinical Trials Network (ECFS-CTN). Data collection occurred between November 2021 and February 2022. RESULTS: The response rate was 90 % (n = 51/57 PIs), with at least 50 % of CF centers in each of the 17 countries represented in the ECFS-CTN. Physicians used a median of eight factors in their decision-making process with delivery formulations (92.2 %), adherence history (84.3 %), and antibiotic side-effect profile (76.5 %) often selected. Nebulised tobramycin or colistin were frequently selected as the inhaled antimicrobial in first-line eradication (n = 45, 88.2 %) and chronic suppression regimens (n = 42, 82.4 %). Combination regimens were more often chosen in eradication (first-line: n = 35, 68.6 %, second-line: n = 34, 66.7 %) and later chronic suppression regimens (third-line: n = 27, 52.9 %) than monotherapy. For pwCF also prescribed CFTR modulator therapies, most PIs did not alter inhaled antimicrobial regimens (n = 40, 78.4 %), with few pwCF (n = 18, 35.3 %) or PIs (n = 10, 19.6 %) deciding to stop inhaled antimicrobials. CONCLUSIONS: The inhaled antimicrobial prescribing decision-making process is multifactorial. Nebulised tobramycin or colistin are often used in initial eradication and chronic suppression regimens. To date, CFTR modulator therapy has had a limited impact on the prescribing of inhaled antimicrobial regimens.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Fibrosis Quística , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Infecciones por Pseudomonas , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Humanos , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración por Inhalación , Fibrosis Quística/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrosis Quística/microbiología , Europa (Continente) , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Tobramicina/administración & dosificación , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores
19.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 81(13): e365-e371, 2024 Jun 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38358317

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Special consideration is needed when intravenous drugs are administered simultaneously using a Y-site connector. This study aimed to investigate the physical compatibility of colistin with 6 analgesics at concentrations commonly used in clinical practice. METHODS: A pharmaceutical preparation of colistin was dissolved according to the manufacturer's instructions and diluted to a concentration of 1.5 mg/mL or 0.67 mg/mL (of colistin base). Simulated administration via Y-site infusion set was performed by mixing 5 mL of colistin solution with an equal volume of a solution of one of 6 intravenous analgesics. Infusion solutions of ibuprofen, ketoprofen, metamizole sodium, morphine sulfate, paracetamol, and tramadol hydrochloride were studied. For each analgesic tested, concentrates for injection were diluted with 2 solvents, resulting in 11 different combinations with each concentration of the colistin solution. The mixtures were visually inspected, and their turbidity was measured directly after mixing and at 3 consecutive time points (30, 60, and 120 minutes). Additionally, the pH of the mixtures was measured after 120 minutes and compared with the pH of the analgesic and the colistin solutions. RESULTS: During visual inspection with the unaided eye, no precipitate formation or gas evolution was observed in any of the tested analgesics except for sodium metamizole, where the yellow color of the solutions was observed. For samples containing the mixture of ibuprofen and colistin, the turbidity measurements revealed the presence of turbidity in the studied mixtures. The greatest change in pH relative to the value immediately after preparation was noted for combinations of ketoprofen and morphine sulfate with the tested antibiotic. CONCLUSION: Colistin was found to be incompatible with ibuprofen and metamizole sodium formulations. It should also not be combined with morphine sulfate due to the significant differences in the pH value of the preparations. The colistin 0.67 mg/mL and 1.5 mg/mL infusion solutions were physically compatible with ketoprofen, tramadol hydrochloride, and paracetamol.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos , Colistina , Incompatibilidad de Medicamentos , Colistina/química , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos/química , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Infusiones Intravenosas , Humanos , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Antibacterianos/química , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación
20.
Rev. chil. infectol ; Rev. chil. infectol;40(3): 203-212., jun. 2023. tab, graf
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-1515120

RESUMEN

RESUMEN: El aumento de la resistencia y la escasez de nuevos antibacterianos ha requerido la reintroducción de antiguos antimicrobianos entre ellos colistín. OBJETIVO: Caracterizar la utilización de colistín durante el año 2017 en un hospital universitario, mediante la descripción de los pacientes, los tratamientos, la microbiología asociada y efectos adversos. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Trabajo observacional retrospectivo. Se revisaron los datos de todos los pacientes que recibieron colistín intravenoso (IV) por al menos 48 horas, durante el año 2017. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 53 pacientes, equivalentes a 91 tratamientos. El foco respiratorio fue el principal (46,2%). El 68,1% de los tratamientos fue iniciado en la UCI. La mayoría de los pacientes tenía una hospitalización reciente (83,5%), y presentaban uso previo de antibacterianos (89%). Los dos patógenos mayoritariamente identificados fueron Pseudomonas aeruginosa y Klebsiella spp. El consumo promedio de colistín fue de 2,4 DDD/100 camas/día. El servicio que más consumió colistín fue la UCI, con 45,5 DDD/100 camas/día, usando generalmente la dosis de 3 MUI cada 8 horas IV y con una baja utilización de dosis de carga. CONCLUSIÓN: Colistín corresponde a un antimicrobiano de uso restringido a infecciones sospechadas o confirmadas por agentes bacterianos multi resistentes. En esta serie, su uso inicial fue principalmente empírico, en pacientes con factores de riesgo para resistencia antibacteriana; se usó en forma asociada a otros antimicrobianos, siendo el foco principal el respiratorio.


BACKGROUND: The increase in resistance and the shortage of new antibiotics has led to the reintroduction of old antimicrobials such as colistin. AIM: To evaluate the use of colistin during 2017 in a university hospital, through the characterization of patients and treatment, associated microbiology, response to treatment and adverse effects. METHODS: Retrospective observational design. The data of all patients who received colistin for at least 48 hours during the year 2017 were reviewed. RESULTS: 55 patients were included, equivalent to 144 treatments. The respiratory focus was the main one (57.9%). 64% of the treatments began in the ICU, while 7% in the ward. Most of the patients has a recent hospitalization (86.8%) and has previous use of antibiotics (90.4%). The two main pathogens identified were Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella spp. In 87.1% of the cases with microbiological justifications for the use of colistin, a favorable response was obtained. The average consumption of colistin was 2.4 DDD/100 beds/day. The department that consumed the most colistin was the ICU, with 45,5 DDD/100 beds/day, generally using a dose of 3 MIU every 8 hours IV and with low use of loading doses. CONCLUSION: Colistin corresponds to an antibiotic whose use is restricted to infections suspected or confirmed by multi-resistant bacterial agents. Its initial use in this serie was mainly empirical, in patients with risk factors for antibiotics resistance, it was used in association with other antimicrobials, being the respiratory the main infectious focus.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto Joven , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Colistina/efectos adversos , Administración Intravenosa , Klebsiella/aislamiento & purificación , Klebsiella/efectos de los fármacos , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA