The importance of bone density and anatomical structure in superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the importance of bone density, surface area, and diameter of anatomical structures of the superior semicircular canal (SSC), lateral semicircular canal (LSC), posterior semicircular canal (PSC), utricle, and saccule in patients diagnosed with superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The bone density, surface area, and diameter of SSC, LSC, PSC, utricle, and saccule were measured and compared between the SSCD group and control group. Fifteen ears in the SSCD group and 60 ears in the control group were evaluated. Additionally, within the SSCD group, the dehiscent and healthy sides were evaluated independently. RESULTS: SSC's bone density was significantly lower in the SSCD group compared to the control group (p = 0.008). No significant differences were found in surface area and diameter between the groups (p > 0.05). While most of the anatomical structures showed no significant difference in bone density between dehiscent and healthy ears (p > 0.05), SSC bone density was significantly lower in affected ears (p = 0.000) in SSCD group. CONCLUSION: Based on the data obtained in this study, bone density and anatomical structure may be useful in patients diagnosed with SSCD.

Scuba Diving-Induced Inner-Ear Pathology: Imaging Findings of Superior Semicircular Canal and Tegmen Tympani Dehiscence.

BACKGROUND Superior semicircular canal dehiscence is an inner-ear pathology which presents with vertigo, disequilibrium, and hearing loss. Although the exact etiology of superior semicircular canal dehiscence is unknown, it is thought that an increase in middle-ear pressure disrupts a thin overlying temporal bone. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence is frequently seen in association with dehiscence of the tegmen tympani, which overlies the middle ear. Here, we present a case report of a 52-year-old Puerto Rican man with vertigo, dizziness, vomiting, and mild hearing loss associated with superior semicircular canal and tegmen tympani dehiscence after performing improper scuba diving techniques. CASE REPORT A 52-year-old Puerto Rican man presented to the emergency department with vertigo, dizziness, vomiting, and mild hearing loss in the right ear. The symptoms began shortly after scuba diving with inadequate decompression techniques on ascent. He was treated with recompression therapy with mild but incomplete improvement in symptoms. Bilateral temporal magnetic resonance imaging was suggestive of segmental dehiscence of the right superior semicircular canal and tegmen tympani. High-resolution computed tomography of the temporal bone confirmed right superior semicircular canal and tegmen tympani dehiscence with an intact left inner ear. CONCLUSIONS The increased inner-ear pressure that occurs during scuba diving can lead to dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal and tegmen tympani, causing vertigo and hearing loss. Performance of improper diving techniques can further increase the risk of dehiscence. Therefore, appropriate radiologic evaluation of the inner ear should be performed in such patients.

Prevalence of Cochlear-Facial and Other Non-Superior Semicircular Canal Third Window Dehiscence on High-Resolution Temporal Bone CT.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The radiologic prevalence of superior semicircular canal dehiscence in the asymptomatic population has been widely studied, but less is known about the rates of other forms of third window dehiscence. Per the existing literature, the radiologic prevalence of cochlear-facial nerve dehiscence, for example, exceeds that seen in histologic studies, suggesting that conventional CT is unreliable for cochlear-facial dehiscence. These studies relied on nonisometric CT acquisitions, however, and underused multiplanar reformatting techniques, leading to false-positive findings. Our purpose was to determine the rate of cochlear-facial dehiscence and other non-superior semicircular canal third window dehiscences on optimized CT in asymptomatic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four-channel temporal bone CT scans from 602 patients in emergency departments were assessed for cochlear-facial and other non-superior semicircular canal third window dehiscences by using high-resolution, multiplanar oblique reformats. Confidence intervals for dehiscence prevalence were calculated using the Newcombe 95% interval confidence method. RESULTS: Of 602 patients, 500 were asymptomatic, while 102 had an imaging indication consistent with possible third window syndrome (symptomatic). Eight asymptomatic patients (1.6%) had cochlear-facial dehiscence, while 43 (8.4%) had jugular bulb-vestibular aqueduct dehiscence. There was no statistically significant difference between the prevalence of cochlear-facial dehiscence or jugular bulb-vestibular aqueduct dehiscence in asymptomatic patients compared with symptomatic patients. Cochlear-carotid canal, cochlear-internal auditory canal, and cochlear-petrosal sinus dehiscences were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Sixty-four-channel CT with multioblique reformatting is sensitive and specific for identifying cochlear-facial dehiscence, with rates similar to those in postmortem series. Jugular bulb-vestibular aqueduct dehiscence is a common incidental finding and is unlikely to produce third window physiology. Other non-superior semicircular canal third window dehiscences are rare in asymptomatic patients.

Analysis of temporal bone thickness outside of the petrous temporal bone between superior semicircular canal dehiscence and normal patients.

BACKGROUND: SSCD is a rare inner ear disorder. This study aims to compare the thickness of the temporal bone beyond the petrous portion between healthy subjects and those with SSCD to determine whether the etiopathology of SSCD is localized to the petrous temporal bone or generalized to other parts of the temporal bone. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of electronic medical records from September 2011 to February 2018 was conducted at a single-institution study at the University of California, Los Angeles. Participants were divided into two groups: Group 1 had a confirmed diagnosis of SSCD, while Group 2 had no known ear or temporal bone pathology. Participants' high-resolution coronal and axial temporal bone computed tomography scans were analyzed. Regions within the temporal bone were measured and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 262 scans were included. Group 1 consisted of 103 scans, while Group 2 consisted of 159 scans. There was no statistically significant difference in the thickness of temporal bones between patients diagnosed with SSCD and patients without otologic disease. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the etiology of SSCD is limited to the petrous portion of the temporal bone. SSCD may be unrelated to a larger process of global temporal bone degeneration. Additional clinical screening for regions outside the petrous temporal bone is not warranted unless SSCD patients present with symptoms characteristic of other temporal bone pathologies.

Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome.

Superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) is a vestibular disorder caused by a pathologic third window into the labyrinth that can present with autophony, sound- or pressure-induced vertigo, and chronic disequilibrium among other vestibulocochlear symptoms. Careful history taking and examination in conjunction with appropriate diagnostic testing can accurately diagnose the syndrome. Key examination techniques include fixation-suppressed ocular motor examination investigating for sound- or pressure-induced eye movements in the plane of the semicircular canal. Audiometry, vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, and computed tomography confirm the diagnosis. Corrective surgical techniques can be curative, but many patients find their symptoms are not severe enough to undergo surgery. Although a primarily peripheral vestibular disorder, as first-line consultants for most dizziness complaints, neurologists will serve their patients well by understanding SCDS and its role in the differential diagnosis of vestibular disorders.

Cautionary Findings for the Presence of Facial Canal Dehiscence During Cholesteatoma Surgery.

Our aim was to investigate the relationship between facial canal dehiscence (FCD) and surgical findings and procedures in patients with cholesteatoma. A total of 186 patients (118 males, 39.2 ± 15 years) who underwent surgery for advanced cholesteatoma between 2013 and 2018 were included in the study. The relationship between FCD and surgical findings was investigated via the surgical registries. The prevalence of FCD was 36.6% (68/186). The prevalence of FCD was 44%, and 13.2% for the patients who underwent canal wall down mastoidectomy (62/141) and canal wall up mastoidectomy (6/45), respectively (P < .001). Facial canal dehiscence was detected in 73.9% of the 23 patients who had a lateral semicircular canal (LSCC) defect (P < .001), in 61.9% of 21 patients who had a tegmen tympani defect, and in 58.1% of the 31 patients who had erosion on the posterior wall of the external auditory canal (EAC; P < .05). The prevalence of FCD was 3.1% in patients with isolated incus erosion, 59.1% in patients with erosion of malleus and incus, 60.7% in patients with erosion of stapes suprastructure and incus, and 43.2% in patients with whole ossicular chain deformation (P < .001). The defects on LSCC, EAC, tegmen tympani, and malleus and incus might be cautionary findings for the presence of FCD during cholesteatoma surgery.