Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 133
Filtrar
1.
Arthritis Rheumatol ; 74(1): 33-37, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34196506

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: B cell depletion is an established therapeutic principle in a wide range of autoimmune diseases. However, B cells are also critical for inducing protective immunity after infection and vaccination. We undertook this study to assess humoral and cellular immune responses after infection with or vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with B cell depletion and controls who are B cell-competent. METHODS: Antibody responses (tested using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) and T cell responses (tested using interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot assay) against the SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 and nucleocapsid proteins were assessed in a limited number of previously infected (n = 6) and vaccinated (n = 8) autoimmune disease patients with B cell depletion, as well as previously infected (n = 30) and vaccinated (n = 30) healthy controls. RESULTS: As expected, B cell and T cell responses to the nucleocapsid protein were observed only after infection, while respective responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 were found after both infection and vaccination. A SARS-CoV-2 antibody response was observed in all vaccinated controls (30 of 30 [100%]) but in none of the vaccinated patients with B cell depletion (0 of 8). In contrast, after SARS-CoV-2 infection, both the patients with B cell depletion (spike S1, 5 of 6 [83%]; nucleocapsid, 3 of 6 [50%]) and healthy controls (spike S1, 28 of 30 [93%]; nucleocapsid, 28 of 30 [93%]) developed antibodies. T cell responses against the spike S1 and nucleocapsid proteins were found in both infected and vaccinated patients with B cell depletion and in the controls. CONCLUSION: These data show that B cell depletion completely blocks humoral but not T cell SARS-CoV-2 vaccination response. Furthermore, limited humoral immune responses are found after SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with B cell depletion.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes/inmunología , Linfocitos B/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/inmunología , Depleción Linfocítica/efectos adversos , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/virología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Humanos , Inmunidad Celular/inmunología , Inmunidad Humoral/inmunología
2.
Front Immunol ; 12: 732826, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34777342

RESUMEN

Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haploSCT) has advanced to a common procedure for treating patients with hematological malignancies and immunodeficiency diseases. However, cure is seriously hampered by cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections and delayed immune reconstitution for the majority of haploidentical transplant recipients compared to HLA-matched stem cell transplantation. Three major approaches, including in vivo T-cell depletion (TCD) using antithymocyte globulin for haploSCT (in vivo TCD-haploSCT), ex vivo TCD using CD34 + positive selection for haploSCT (ex vivo TCD-haploSCT), and T-cell replete haploSCT using posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy-haploSCT), are currently used worldwide. We provide an update on CMV infection and CMV-specific immune recovery in this fast-evolving field. The progress made in cellular immunotherapy of CMV infection after haploSCT is also addressed. Groundwork has been prepared for the creation of personalized avenues to enhance immune reconstitution and decrease the incidence of CMV infection after haploSCT.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/prevención & control , Citomegalovirus/inmunología , Reconstitución Inmune , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Depleción Linfocítica , Infecciones Oportunistas/prevención & control , Trasplante de Células Madre/efectos adversos , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante , Animales , Antígenos CD34/inmunología , Suero Antilinfocítico/uso terapéutico , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Citomegalovirus/patogenicidad , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/inmunología , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/virología , Antígenos HLA/genética , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Haplotipos , Interacciones Huésped-Patógeno , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Depleción Linfocítica/efectos adversos , Infecciones Oportunistas/inmunología , Infecciones Oportunistas/virología , Linfocitos T/efectos de los fármacos , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Linfocitos T/metabolismo , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/efectos adversos
3.
Front Immunol ; 12: 694763, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34177960

RESUMEN

There is an urgent need for therapeutic interventions for desensitization and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in sensitized patients with preformed or de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA). The risk of AMR and allograft loss in sensitized patients is increased due to preformed DSA detected at time of transplant or the reactivation of HLA memory after transplantation, causing acute and chronic AMR. Alternatively, de novo DSA that develops post-transplant due to inadequate immunosuppression and again may lead to acute and chronic AMR or even allograft loss. Circulating antibody, the final product of the humoral immune response, has been the primary target of desensitization and AMR treatment. However, in many cases these protocols fail to achieve efficient removal of all DSA and long-term outcomes of patients with persistent DSA are far worse when compared to non-sensitized patients. We believe that targeting multiple components of humoral immunity will lead to improved outcomes for such patients. In this review, we will briefly discuss conventional desensitization methods targeting antibody or B cell removal and then present a mechanistically designed desensitization regimen targeting plasma cells and the humoral response.


Asunto(s)
Desensibilización Inmunológica , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Histocompatibilidad , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Isoanticuerpos/sangre , Trasplante de Riñón , Depleción Linfocítica , Animales , Linfocitos B/inmunología , Desensibilización Inmunológica/efectos adversos , Rechazo de Injerto/sangre , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Inmunidad Humoral , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Depleción Linfocítica/efectos adversos , Células Plasmáticas/inmunología , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
J Immunother Cancer ; 9(5)2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34021033

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The adoptive transfer of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) has demonstrated robust efficacy in metastatic melanoma patients. Tumor antigen-loaded dendritic cells (DCs) are believed to optimally activate antigen-specific T lymphocytes. We hypothesized that the combined transfer of TIL, containing a melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1 (MART-1) specific population, with MART-1-pulsed DC will result in enhanced proliferation and prolonged survival of transferred MART-1 specific T cells in vivo ultimately leading to improved clinical responses. DESIGN: We tested the combination of TIL and DC in a phase II clinical trial of patients with advanced stage IV melanoma. HLA-A0201 patients whose early TIL cultures demonstrated reactivity to MART-1 peptide were randomly assigned to receive TIL alone or TIL +DC pulsed with MART-1 peptide. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the persistence of MART-1 TIL in the two arms. Secondary endpoints were to evaluate clinical response and survival. RESULTS: Ten patients were given TIL alone while eight patients received TIL+DC vaccine. Infused MART-1 reactive CD8+ TIL were tracked in the blood over time by flow cytometry and results show good persistence in both arms, with no difference in the persistence of MART-1 between the two arms. The objective response rate was 30% (3/10) in the TIL arm and 50% (4/8) in the TIL+DC arm. All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of TIL +DC showed no difference in the persistence of MART-1 TIL compared with TIL therapy alone. Although more patients showed a clinical response to TIL+DC therapy, this study was not powered to resolve differences between groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00338377.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra el Cáncer/uso terapéutico , Células Dendríticas/trasplante , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Depleción Linfocítica , Linfocitos Infiltrantes de Tumor/trasplante , Melanoma/terapia , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Linfocitos T/trasplante , Adolescente , Adulto , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Células Dendríticas/inmunología , Células Dendríticas/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Depleción Linfocítica/efectos adversos , Linfocitos Infiltrantes de Tumor/inmunología , Linfocitos Infiltrantes de Tumor/metabolismo , Antígeno MART-1/inmunología , Antígeno MART-1/metabolismo , Masculino , Melanoma/inmunología , Melanoma/metabolismo , Melanoma/secundario , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Cutáneas/inmunología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Linfocitos T/metabolismo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
5.
J Immunother Cancer ; 9(5)2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33990415

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adoptive cell therapy with T cells genetically engineered to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T) or tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes (TIL) demonstrates impressive clinical results in patients with cancer. Lymphodepleting preconditioning prior to cell infusion is an integral part of all adoptive T cell therapies. However, to date, there is no standardization and no data comparing different non-myeloablative (NMA) regimens. METHODS: In this study, we compared NMA therapies with different doses of cyclophosphamide or total body irradiation (TBI) in combination with fludarabine and evaluated bone marrow suppression and recovery, cytokine serum levels, clinical response and adverse events. RESULTS: We demonstrate that a cumulative dose of 120 mg/kg cyclophosphamide and 125 mg/m2 fludarabine (120Cy/125Flu) and 60Cy/125Flu preconditioning were equally efficient in achieving deep lymphopenia and neutropenia in patients with metastatic melanoma, whereas absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) and absolute neutrophil counts were significantly higher following 200 cGyTBI/75Flu-induced NMA. Thrombocytopenia was most profound in 120Cy/125Flu patients. 30Cy/75Flu-induced preconditioning in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia resulted in a minor ALC decrease, had no impact on platelet counts and did not yield deep neutropenia. Following cell infusion, 120Cy/125Flu patients with objective tumor response had significantly higher ALC and significant lower inflammatory indexes, such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis 7 days after cell infusion was performed to determine the cut-offs, which distinguish between responding and non-responding patients in the 120Cy/125Flu cohort. NLR≤1.79 and PLR≤32.7 were associated with clinical response and overall survival. Cytokine serum levels did not associate with clinical response in patients with TIL. Patients in the 120Cy/125Flu cohort developed significantly more acute NMA-related adverse events, including thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia and cardiotoxicity, and stayed significantly longer in hospital compared with the 60Cy/125Flu and TBI/75Flu cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Bone marrow depletion and recovery were equally affected by 120Cy/125Flu and 60Cy/125Flu preconditioning; however, toxicity and consequently duration of hospitalization were significantly lower in the 60Cy/125Flu cohort. Patients in the 30Cy/75Flu and TBI/75Flu groups rarely developed NMA-induced adverse events; however, both regimens were not efficient in achieving deep bone marrow suppression. Among the regimens, 60Cy/125Flu preconditioning seems to achieve maximum effect with minimum toxicity.


Asunto(s)
Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Depleción Linfocítica , Melanoma/terapia , Agonistas Mieloablativos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Linfocitos T/trasplante , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante , Vidarabina/análogos & derivados , Irradiación Corporal Total , Adulto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Citocinas/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Tiempo de Internación , Depleción Linfocítica/efectos adversos , Masculino , Melanoma/inmunología , Melanoma/metabolismo , Melanoma/secundario , Persona de Mediana Edad , Agonistas Mieloablativos/efectos adversos , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/genética , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/metabolismo , Recuperación de la Función , Neoplasias Cutáneas/inmunología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Linfocitos T/metabolismo , Factores de Tiempo , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vidarabina/farmacología , Irradiación Corporal Total/efectos adversos
6.
Int J Infect Dis ; 107: 247-250, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33901654

RESUMEN

Prolonged B-cell depletion due to anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAbs) therapy impairs the adaptive immune response, causing severe manifestations during COronaVIrus Disease-2019 (COVID-19). The cases of two patients under anti-CD20 therapy who experienced prolonged and severe COVID-19 successfully treated with mAbs against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-CoV-2 spike proteins are reported.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Linfocitos B/inmunología , COVID-19/complicaciones , Depleción Linfocítica/efectos adversos , SARS-CoV-2 , Antígenos CD20/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19
8.
Eur J Haematol ; 106(1): 114-125, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33025625

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of CD34+ selected ex vivo T-cell depletion (TCD) vs post-transplant cyclophosphamide, sirolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil (PTCy-Sir-MMF) as graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. METHODS: We retrospectively included patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with either TCD (n = 38) or PTCy-Sir-MMF (n = 91). RESULTS: Cumulative incidence of neutrophil and platelet recovery was 92% vs 99% (P = .06) and 89% vs 97% (P = .3) in TCD and PTCy-Sir-MMF, respectively. Cumulative incidences of aGHVD grade II-IV, III-IV, and moderate to severe cGVHD were 11% vs 19% (P = .2), 3% vs 2% (P = .9), and 3% vs 36% (P < .001) in TCD and PTCy-Sir-MMF, respectively. The 2-year non-relapse mortality, relapse, disease-free and overall survival were 25% vs 8% (P = .01), 20% vs 16% (P = .2), 55% vs 76% (P = .004), 57% vs 83% (P = .004) for TCD and PTCy-Sir-MMF, respectively. Cumulative incidence of cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr infection requiring therapy was 76% vs 40% (P < .001) and 32% vs 0% (P < .001) in TCD and PTCy-Sir-MMF, respectively. PTCy-Sir-MMF platform showed faster T-cell reconstitution. CONCLUSIONS: PTCy-Sir-MMF provides better survival outcomes but is associated with higher risk of cGVHD compared to TCD.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/prevención & control , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Depleción Linfocítica/efectos adversos , Depleción Linfocítica/métodos , Linfocitos T/efectos de los fármacos , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/mortalidad , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Humanos , Reconstitución Inmune , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/complicaciones , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Recuento de Leucocitos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Micofenólico/administración & dosificación , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Pronóstico , Recurrencia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Trasplante Homólogo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
9.
Immunol Res ; 68(6): 340-352, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33174125

RESUMEN

IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is an immune-mediated disorder often showing elevated serum IgG4 concentrations, dense T and B lymphocyte infiltration, and IgG4-positive plasma cells and storiform fibrosis. We prospectively evaluated for 4 years 5 patients with histologically proven IgG4-RD of whom 3 had tubulointerstitial nephritis (TIN) and 2 had retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF). They received an intensive B depletion therapy with rituximab. The estimated glomerular filtration rate of TIN patients after 1 year increased from 9 to 24 ml/min per 1.73 m2. IgG/IgG4 dropped from 3236/665 to 706/51 mg/dl, C3/C4 went up from 49/6 to 99/27 mg/dl, and the IgG4-RD responder index fell from 10 to 1. CD20+ B cells decreased from 8.7 to 0.5%. A striking drop in interstitial plasma cell infiltrate as well as normalization of IgG4/IgG-positive plasma cells was observed at repeat biopsy. Both clinical and immunological improvement persisted over a 4-year follow-up. Treating these patients who were affected by aggressive IgG4-RD with renal involvement in an effort to induce a prolonged B cells depletion with IgG4 and cytokine production decrease resulted in a considerable rise in eGFR, with IgG4-RD RI normalization and a noteworthy improvement in clinical and histological features. Furthermore, the TIN subgroup was shown not to need for any maintenance therapy.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Relacionada con Inmunoglobulina G4/complicaciones , Enfermedad Relacionada con Inmunoglobulina G4/terapia , Enfermedades Renales/etiología , Enfermedades Renales/terapia , Depleción Linfocítica , Biomarcadores , Biopsia , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Enfermedad Relacionada con Inmunoglobulina G4/sangre , Enfermedad Relacionada con Inmunoglobulina G4/diagnóstico , Inmunohistoquímica , Inmunofenotipificación , Enfermedades Renales/diagnóstico , Pruebas de Función Renal , Recuento de Linfocitos , Depleción Linfocítica/efectos adversos , Depleción Linfocítica/métodos , Subgrupos Linfocitarios/inmunología , Subgrupos Linfocitarios/metabolismo , Masculino , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Expert Rev Hematol ; 13(8): 835-850, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32749913

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The accessibility to haplo-donors has led to an increase in the number of haplo-HSCT worldwide. A systematic search of the PubMed database between 2000 to present was performed. AREAS COVERED: In this review, the authors discussed the most used approaches to perform haplo-HSCT and its results: T-cell depletion (TCD, including Perugia platform and its modifications) and T-cell repleted haplo (TCR, including the high-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide strategy (Baltimore protocol) and the Beijing protocol). The improvements and modifications made to the different strategies have increased the indications of haplo-HSCT, including both malignant and nonmalignant disorders. Focusing on the Baltimore protocol, the authors review the results of the retrospective studies that have compared it to other donor transplants. The limitations of this strategy in terms of toxicity, graft complications, and GVHD are also discussed in detail. Finally, possible approaches to improve the outcomes of TCR haplo-HSCT are presented. EXPERT OPINION: The recent advances in the field of haplo-HSCT have allowed a large number of patients with incurable diseases to benefit from this procedure despite not having a matched donor. With all available strategies, virtually no patient who needs an allogeneic transplant should be excluded by the absence of a donor.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Trasplante Haploidéntico , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/tendencias , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad , Humanos , Reconstitución Inmune , Depleción Linfocítica/efectos adversos , Depleción Linfocítica/métodos , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Donantes de Tejidos , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/efectos adversos , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/métodos , Trasplante Haploidéntico/efectos adversos , Trasplante Haploidéntico/métodos , Trasplante Haploidéntico/tendencias
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA