Assessing the Burden of Atopic Dermatitis in Portugal through Patient-Centered Experiences.

INTRODUCTION: Adult patients and caregivers of children with atopic dermatitis experience high physical, mental, and financial burden in Portugal. We outline the experience of atopic dermatitis management and how the current medical care model impacts patient-centered concerns such as financial burden, quality of life, disease burden, and treatment satisfaction. METHODS: We conducted a survey of 419 Portuguese adults and caregivers of children to capture the experience of managing atopic dermatitis in Portugal. RESULTS: Respondents reported average satisfaction with treatment, with a mean satisfaction rating of 3.15/5.00 (SD = 0.77). Adults reported slightly better control of atopic dermatitis symptoms (mean = 56.6) than pediatric patients (mean = 55.9, caregiver reported). Nearly 34% of adults and 39% of caregivers of children and adolescents indicated that their healthcare providers asked about their priorities at the last medical visit. Additionally, only 40% of adult patients and 32% of caregivers reported that patient training was offered to them. Respondents seeing dermatologists reported higher satisfaction than those seeing other healthcare providers (p = 0.01) but there were no differences in long-term control of symptoms by provider type (p = 0.85) when controlling for severity. Portuguese adult patients scored 0.86/1.00 on the EQ-5D (where 0 = death and 1 = perfect health). Financial concern was high as nearly 80% of patients and caregivers reported using savings, borrowing money, and/or reducing spending to cover atopic dermatitis-related costs. CONCLUSION: Portuguese patients with atopic dermatitis and caregivers experience financial burden, lower health-related quality of life, higher disease burden, and treatment satisfaction issues with their current medical care. These factors often deteriorate as the disease's severity increases. Providers, researchers and policymakers should focus on better addressing patient-centered concerns for individuals suffering from atopic dermatitis to improve care and health outcomes.

Global Burden of Atopic Dermatitis: Examining Disease Prevalence Across Pediatric and Adult Populations World-Wide.

Atopic Dermatitis (AD) is a common, pruritic inflammatory skin disease associated with marked disease burden and substantial health care costs. AD does not discriminate between populations; prevalence estimates vary widely with most studies focusing on general or pediatric populations and a limited number of studies in adult populations solely. The costs of treating AD are staggering. Studies that examine differences in prevalence may be difficult to compare due to differences in study designs. However, understanding the prevalence of AD across populations is critical if we are to improve the lives of patients and caregivers living with this disease.

Italian healthcare resource consumptions and direct costs of adults with atopic dermatitis before and after dupilumab treatment.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a heterogeneous disease, associated with comorbidities, and high healthcare consumptions and costs. This study assessed the burden before and after treatment with dupilumab in adults with severe AD from 2018 to 2020, from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service (SSN). METHODS: From Fondazione Ricerca e Salute's administrative healthcare database (~5 million inhabitants/year), adults treated with dupilumab from 09/01/2018 to 31/12/2020 (index date) and a five-year lookback were identified. Age, sex and comorbidities at baseline, concomitant drugs, overnight hospitalizations, outpatient specialist services and direct costs charged to the SSN one year before/after index date were assessed. RESULTS: Of 337 adults treated with dupilumab (5.8x100,000 adult inhabitants/2019; 8.0x100,000/2020; 55% males; mean age 43±19), 68% (228/337) had ≥12-month follow-up available. Asthma was a common comorbidity (23% patients). Rates of patients treated with nearly all concomitant AD-related therapies reduced from 12 months before to 12 months after dupilumab treatment: antibacterials (from 59% to 50%), systemic corticosteroids (55% to 29%), antihistamines (54% to 38%) and cyclosporine (52% to 7%). A similar trend was observed among patients with asthma as comorbidity. Within 12 months before/after dupilumab, patients hospitalized halved from 14% to 7%, and patients receiving outpatient specialist care reduced from 72% to 65%. Annual mean direct total costs per patient treated with dupilumab charged to the SSN, net of dupilumab cost, were €1384 and €773, before and after dupilumab dispensation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Before dupilumab, observed patients had higher healthcare resource consumptions and direct SSN costs than after dupilumab.

Clinical and economic evaluation of tralokinumab for atopic dermatitis.

Tralokinumab is the first selective interleukin 13 inhibitor approved for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. This article reports the findings of a comprehensive literature review and extensive economic analysis to assess tralokinumab's safety, effectiveness, and cost. Evidence synthesis involved evaluating comparative effectiveness and conducting economic sensitivity analyses. This review was prepared by the University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) Student Chapter. The student author group won the AMCP National Pharmacy and Therapeutics competition for their tralokinumab product review in March 2023.

The UPDATE trial (UVB Phototherapy in Dermatology for ATopic Eczema): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of narrowband UVB with optimal topical therapy versus optimal topical therapy in patients with atopic eczema.

BACKGROUND: Narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) phototherapy is commonly prescribed for patients with moderate-to-severe atopic eczema (AE). The efficacy of NB-UVB, however, has not yet properly been established, as current evidence is of low certainty. Our aim is to assess the short-term and long-term (cost-)effectiveness and safety of NB-UVB in adult AE patients by performing a pragmatic, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE) trial. This protocol outlines its methodology. METHODS: A pragmatic, multicenter, PROBE trial will be performed with 1:1 randomization of 316 adult patients with moderate-to-severe AE who have inadequate disease control with topical therapy and who are eligible for optimal topical therapy (OTT) or NB-UVB in combination with OTT as a next step. Participants in the interventional arm will receive a minimum of 3 months of OTT combined with 8 to 16 weeks of NB-UVB. The control group receives 3 months of OTT. Following the interventional phase, follow-up will continue for 9 months. Physician-reported and patient-reported outcomes (according to the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) Core Outcome Set) and adverse events are assessed at 4 weeks, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. DISCUSSION: The UPDATE trial aims to provide high-quality evidence regarding the (cost-)effectiveness and safety of NB-UVB phototherapy in moderate-to-severe AE patients. Challenges that are addressed in the protocol include the possible bias arising from applying open-label treatment and the necessity of introducing OTT into the study design to prevent a high dropout rate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05704205. Registered on December 8, 2022.

The Economic Impact of Atopic Dermatitis.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder that affects over 30 million people in the United States. Given the large and growing prevalence of AD, the associated economic burden is significant. It has been estimated that AD costs over $5 billion dollars annually. These costs include both direct and indirect costs. Direct costs include prescription medicines, visits to health-care providers, hospitalizations, and transportation. Indirect costs include missed days or lost productivity at work or school, career modification, and reduced quality of life. Understanding and measuring these costs can be accomplished through rigorous economic evaluation, which is the organized process of considering inputs and outcomes of various activities. Economic evaluation has been used to contextualize the burden of AD in society. It has also been used to inform patients, providers, and other stakeholders on how to deliver the most evidence-based, efficient way possible. Understanding the economic impact of atopic dermatitis is an important aspect of delivering high-quality care.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of abrocitinib compared with standard of care in adult moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in Japan.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with a significant clinical, economic, and human burden. The JAK1 Atopic Dermatitis Efficacy and Safety (JADE) program's Phase 3 trials demonstrated that as a treatment for moderate-to-severe AD in adults with previous exposure to immunotherapy, abrocitinib showed superior efficacy and safety compared with standard of care (SoC), consisting of topical corticosteroids. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of abrocitinib with SoC versus SoC alone for this patient population in Japan from a societal perspective. A hybrid decision tree and Markov model were used to capture the initial treatment and long-term maintenance phases. Clinical inputs at 16 weeks were obtained through a Bayesian network meta-analysis of four pivotal trials from the JADE program. Clinical inputs at 52 weeks were derived from the JADE EXTEND trial. Response-specific utility inputs were obtained from published literature. Resource use, costs, and productivity inputs were gathered from Japanese claims analysis, literature, public documents, and expert opinion. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at 2.0% per year and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to validate the base case results and explore a payer perspective. Over a lifetime horizon and with the base-case societal perspective, abrocitinib produced a mean gain of 0.75 QALYs, incremental costs of JPY (¥) 2 270 386 (USD [$] 17 265.6), and a resulting ICER of ¥3 034 514 ($23 076.5) per QALY compared with SoC. From a payer perspective, the incremental costs increased to ¥4 476 777 ($34 044.4), with an ICER of ¥5 983 495 ($45 502.6) per QALY. The results were most sensitive to treatment-specific, response-based utility weights, drug costs, and productivity-related inputs. From a Japanese societal perspective, abrocitinib demonstrated superior QALYs and with a willingness-to-pay threshold of ¥5 000 000 ($38 023.4) per QALY, can be considered cost-effective compared with SoC as a treatment for moderate-to-severe AD in adult patients with previous immunosuppressant exposure.

Exacerbating factors and disease burden in patients with atopic dermatitis.

The number of patients with atopic dermatitis is on the rise worldwide, and Japan is no exception. According to recent estimates of the percentage of patients with atopic dermatitis in Japan by age, the majority of patients are between 20 and 44 years old. Because the peak age of onset of atopic dermatitis is during infancy, many patients may experience prolonged symptoms from infancy to adulthood. A prolonged clinical course also increases the burden of atopic dermatitis on affected patients. Decreased productivity due to work disruptions, reduced daily activity, higher direct medical costs, fatigue, and daytime sleepiness due to sleep disturbances are typical burdens on patients with atopic dermatitis. In order to reduce these burdens, it is necessary to shorten its clinical course and achieve long-term control without relying on medications, possibly by using avoidance or coping measures of aggravating factors. Typical aggravating factors of atopic dermatitis include irritant dermatitis, food allergy in children, sweating, and psychological stress in adults. Food allergy places a heavy burden on the quality of life of affected patients and their families. The effectiveness of educational interventions for sweating and psychological stress is unclear. We must also evaluate the economic burden and cost-effectiveness of interventions on the patient as aggravating factors to be addressed.

The direct and indirect costs of adult atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis is considered a childhood illness, and the direct and indirect health care burden of atopic dermatitis in adults is not fully understood. OBJECTIVE: To measure the direct and indirect costs of atopic dermatitis among adults in 2018. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared commercial and Medicare-insured adults with atopic dermatitis in 2018 with directly matched (1:3) adults without atopic dermatitis. Atopic dermatitis prevalence was reported. Health care utilization, direct health care costs, and work loss data were compared between cohorts. This analysis was repeated for adults with atopic dermatitis in 2016 and 2017. RESULTS: 31,164 adults with atopic dermatitis in 2018 were identified and directly matched (1:3) to controls. Adults with atopic dermatitis had greater utilization of outpatient services, outpatient pharmacy services, and short-term disability benefits than controls. Unadjusted annual health care costs in 2018 were $4,979 higher for adults with atopic dermatitis ($14,603) than for the matched controls ($9,624), driven by outpatient services and pharmacy. Findings were supported by analyses of adults from 2016 and 2017 and multivariable analyses. One limitation of this study was that patients with mild cases of atopic dermatitis may not seek medical treatment and may be underrepresented in the study cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The direct health care and indirect (short-term disability) health care costs of atopic dermatitis present a significant health care burden among the adult population. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company. Employees of Eli Lilly were involved in the planning, execution, and interpretation of the study. Pierce is employed by Eli Lilly and Company. Boytsov and Goldblum were employed by Eli Lilly and Company Health at the time this research was conducted. Manjelievskaia and Brouillette are employed by IBM Watson Health, which received funding from Eli Lilly and Company to conduct this study. Bonafede and Onyekwere were employed at IBM Watson Health at the time this research was conducted.

Financial Burden of Atopic Dermatitis Out-of-Pocket Health Care Expenses in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with considerable financial cost. However, the full burden of out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses is not well understood. OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the OOP health care expenses associated with AD management. METHODS: A 25-question voluntary online survey was administered to National Eczema Association members worldwide (n = 113,502). Inclusion criteria (US residents age ≥18 years who either self-reported had AD or were primary caregivers of individuals with AD) were met by 77.3% (1118/1447) of respondents. RESULTS: Respondents reported OOP expenses in 3 categories: (1) health care providers and prescriptions, including health care provider visit deductibles (68.7% [686]), prescription co-pays (64.3% [635]), and prescriptions not covered by insurance (48.6% [468]); (2) nonprescription health care products, including moisturizers (94.3% [934]), hygiene products (85.0% [824], allergy medications (75.1% [715]), itch relievers (68.25% [647]), dietary supplements (52.2% [491]), and sleep aids (37.0% [336]); and (3) complementary approaches, including cleaning products (74.7% [732]), clothing/bedding (44.8% [430]), alternative medications (19.0% [180]), and adjunctive therapies (15.9% [150]). The median annual AD OOP expense was US $600 (range, US $0-$200,000), with 41.9% (364) reporting expenditures US $1000 or greater. CONCLUSIONS: Out-of-pocket expenses place a significant financial burden on individuals with AD. Additional studies are needed to better understand associations and impact of OOP costs.

Atopic dermatitis in specialized centers in Spain: a retrospective analysis of incidence and costs (2000-2017).

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that has substantial effects on patients' quality of life, with a prevalence between 2.2% and 17.6% worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the use of specialized care resources generated by children and adults with atopic dermatitis, and the associated direct medical costs. METHODS: Admission details from patients admitted in specialized healthcare centers (inpatient and outpatient care) in Spain between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2017 were analyzed in a retrospective multicentre study. RESULTS: Records corresponded to 3036 patients, 1266 aged 5 years or younger. Comorbid conditions corresponded to skin infections and respiratory difficulties (asthma, bronchiectasis). Hospital incidence of atopic dermatitis was 5.8 per 100,000 persons, stable over the study period, and 30.0 per 100,000 in those aged 5 years and younger. Mean annual direct medical cost per patient was €2469. Overall, direct medical costs per patient increased significantly over the study period (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Hospital incidence of atopic dermatitis remained stable over the study period, which is in contrast with the increasing incidence reported by the Spanish government in primary care centers. The increase in direct medical costs of specialized care responded to the increase in treatment costs.

Psychosocial burden and out-of-pocket costs in patients with atopic dermatitis in Ireland.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most common inflammatory skin diseases in the developed world, affecting 1-3% of the adult population in Europe. This inflammatory disease can have a marked impact on affected individuals, leading to significant impairment in physical wellbeing and quality of life (QoL). The aim of this study was to investigate the psychosocial impact and financial burden of AD on patients in Ireland. To increase our understanding of the psychosocial and financial aspects of AD disease burden in the Irish population, an online survey was designed. The survey was launched by the Irish Skin Foundation, and included questions focusing on disease severity, disease control, psychosocial impact, interrupted sleep, missed work and school days, and financial cost. The survey showed that the impact of AD on QoL was profound. The survey demonstrated that 85% of adults described interrupted sleep, 70% reported social anxiety, 65% avoid exercise and sports, 52% avoid social activities, 52% avoid sexual intimacy and 43% feel they are depressed as a result of their AD. Approximately one-quarter of those surveyed can spend up to €2300 annually on over-the-counter, prescription and alternative treatments. This study has shown the significant impact AD has on patients living in Ireland. It also highlights that out-of-pocket costs for patients is higher compared with previous studies across European countries.

Does location matter? Geographic variations in healthcare resource use for atopic dermatitis in the United States.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown which region of the U.S. offers the best and worst access to care for atopic dermatitis (AD). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) from 1996 to 2015 to compare healthcare resource use and cost of AD among U.S. census regions. We conducted multivariable regression analyses adjusting for clinicodemographic factors to evaluate regional differences in healthcare resource use and cost per patient per year (PPPY) in terms of ambulatory visits, ED visits, and medications directly attributable to AD. RESULTS: An estimated total of 6,348,578 (95% CI: 5,944,553-6,752,803) AD patients (weighted) were pooled. Compared to the remainder of the country, Midwest AD patients utilized the fewest ambulatory visits (0.55 versus 0.75 visits PPPY; p = .035). The proportion of patients with ≥1 ED visits was highest in the Midwest (7.1%), followed by the South (5.4%), Northeast (4.8%), and West (1.4%). Within the Midwest AD population, those with no ambulatory visits per year utilized nearly three times more ED visits when compared with those with one or more ambulatory visits per year (0.11 versus 0.04 visits PPPY; p = .019). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that Midwest AD patients have differential access to outpatient care, which may be resulting in higher ED usage.

Effects of variations in access to care for children with atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: An estimated 50% of children in the US are Medicaid-insured. Some of these patients have poor health literacy and limited access to medications and specialty care. These factors affect treatment utilization for pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), the most common inflammatory skin disease in children. This study assesses and compares treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) between large cohorts of Medicaid and commercially insured children with AD. METHODS: Pediatric patients with AD were identified from 2 large US healthcare claims databases (2011-2016). Included patients had continuous health plan eligibility for ≥6 months before and ≥12 months after the first AD diagnosis (index date). Patients with an autoimmune disease diagnosis within 6 months of the index date were excluded. Treatment patterns and all-cause and AD-related HCRU during the observation period were compared between commercially and Medicaid-insured children. RESULTS: A minority of children were evaluated by a dermatology or allergy/immunology specialist. Several significant differences were observed between commercially and Medicaid-insured children with AD. Disparities detected for Medicaid-insured children included: comparatively fewer received specialist care, emergency department and urgent care center utilization was higher, a greater proportion had asthma and non-atopic morbidities, high- potency topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors were less often prescribed, and prescriptions for antihistamines were more than three times higher, despite similar rates of comorbid asthma and allergies among antihistamine users. Treatment patterns also varied substantially across physician specialties. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest barriers in accessing specialty care for all children with AD and significant differences in management between commercially and Medicaid-insured children. These disparities in treatment and access to specialty care may contribute to poor AD control, especially in Medicaid-insured patients.

Burden and socioeconomics of asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis and food allergy.

INTRODUCTION: Asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and food allergy affect approximately 20% of the global population. Few studies describe the burden of the totality of these diseases and only a handful studies provide a comprehensive overview of the socioeconomic impact of these diseases. AREAS COVERED: For this narrative review, we searched Pubmed using selected keywords and inspected relevant references using a snowballing process. We provide an overview of the socioeconomic burden of allergic diseases (in particular, asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and food allergy). The focus of this review is on their epidemiology (incidence, prevalence), burden (disability-adjusted life years, quality of life), and direct and indirect costs (absenteeism and presenteeism). We have put special emphasis on differences between countries. EXPERT COMMENTARY: Both the prevalence and the burden of allergic diseases are considerable with prevalence varying between 1% and 20%. We identified a plethora of studies on asthma, but studies were generally difficult to compare due to the heterogeneity in measures used. There were only few studies on the burden of food allergy; therefore, more studies on this allergy are required. For future studies, we recommend standardizing epidemiologic, socioeconomic impact, and quality of life measures of allergic diseases.

Pearls for Managing Atopic Dermatitis in Patients With Low Socioeconomic Status.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis presenting with inflamed and itchy skin. Recent studies have shown an inverse relationship between socioeconomic status and the severity of AD. Low socioeconomic status (LSES) individuals with AD face specific barriers that may impede management. These include forgoing doctor's appointments due to transportation costs, inability to take time off from work, and lack of affordable childcare services. Unaffordable medications and over-the-counter products for managing AD further present as significant challenges for LSES patients. This article aims to offer practical and affordable recommendations to help mitigate the challenges faced by LSES patients with AD and thereby alleviate disease burden and improve treatment outcomes.