Superficial radiotherapy (SRT-100) for refractory plantar warts: An alternative noninvasive treatment strategy.

BACKGROUND: Verrucas that occur on the soles of the feet are called plantar warts, most of which can recur repeatedly and are difficult to eradicate. Hypertrophic and refractory plantar warts are often accompanied by pain and discomfort, which cause many inconveniences in patients' daily lives. AIM: This study aimed to analyze the therapeutic effect of superficial radiotherapy (SRT-100) on refractory plantar warts and further create favorable conditions for the subsequent treatment of this disease with a high recurrence rate. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted for refractory plantar warts treated with superficial radiotherapy in our outpatient department from January to June 2023. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were included in our study (median age, 33 years). The female-to-male ratio was 1:3.29. Two to six months after radiotherapy, all of the warts subsided in 23 (76.67%) patients, most of the warts subsided in 4 (13.33%) patients, 3 (10%) patients did not respond to treatment, and 7 (23.33%) patients had recurrent or new warts after their warts subsided. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with refractory plantar warts improved after superficial radiotherapy. Our study presented that men are more susceptible to plantar warts than women, and young and middle-aged people are the main population affected by the disease. Superficial radiotherapy is an effective treatment for refractory plantar warts, which can quickly remove the warts in a short period. It is safe and noninvasive, with minimal adverse reactions. Some patients relapse after the lesion is clear, and superficial radiotherapy can create favorable conditions for the subsequent treatment of viral warts in clinical practice.

Combined long-pulsed Nd-Yag laser and itraconazole versus itraconazole alone in the treatment of onychomycosis nails.

Background: Oral antifungal therapies are effective for onychomycosis but it was complicated by systemic effects. Effective and safe therapy is needed to improve esthetic appearance of nails.Objective: The present study is an attempt to evaluate and compare the efficacy of of combined treatment of onychomycosis with 1,064-nm long-pulsed Nd-Yag laser and pulse itraconazole therapy versus pulse itraconazole alone.Methods: Thirty onychomycosis patients were divided into two groups: Groups I and II. Patients of Group I are treated by itraconazole pulse therapy. Patients of Group II received six laser sessions with long-pulsed Nd:Yag laser and itraconazole pulse therapy. The investigators rated clearance using "Onychomycosis Severity Index (OSI)", photographs, and mycology at 6 and 9 months after treatment.Results: Group I's clinical improvement response was excellent in two cases, good in six cases, moderate in five cases, and mild in two cases. Mycological improvement response was excellent in two cases, good in two cases, moderate in six cases, and mild in five cases (OSI before treatment was 13.4 ± 3.02 and after was 6.67 ± 3.6). Group II's clinical improvement response was excellent in 10, good in 3, moderate in 1, and mild in 1. Mycological improvement's response was excellent in two cases, good in two cases, moderate in six cases, and mild in five cases (OSI before treatment was 13.33 ± 3.11 and after was 5.07 ± 4.15). There were no adverse effects. The clinical response showed best results with Group II, but the mycological cure was equal in both groups.Conclusions: The use of combined long-pulsed Nd-Yag laser and itraconazole pulse therapy gives the best clinical results and patient's satisfaction.

The Energy Density and Treatment Times Are the Main Factors That Affect the Efficacy of Long-Pulsed 1,064-nm Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Onychomycosis Caused by Trichophyton rubrum.

BACKGROUND: No optimal regimen exists for the LPNYL (long-pulsed 1,064-nm neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser) for treating onychomycosis. OBJECTIVE: To establish an optimal LPNYL treatment regimen for onychomycosis caused by Trichophyton rubrum (OCTr). PATIENTS AND METHODS: First, 511 infected nails of 177 patients were treated using LPNYL with orthogonally designed regimens according to various energy densities, spot sizes, pulse widths, and treatment times. The optimal treatment regimen was established by multivariate analysis. Next, 69 patients with 221 infected nails were randomized to receive oral itraconazole (drug group) and the optimal regimen of LPNYL treatment (laser group). The clinical efficacy (CE) and mycological efficacy (ME) were evaluated at 6 and 12 months following the start of treatment, and adverse reactions were recorded in both groups. RESULTS: Both CE and ME were significantly correlated with the energy density (p < 0.05) and treatment times (p < 0.05), but not with the spot size (0.071 < p < 0.083) or pulse width (0.051 < p < 0.060), at 6 or 12 months. There were no significant differences at 6 or 12 months (p > 0.05), and no significant difference was observed in CE at 12 months between the two groups (p > 0.05). At 6 months, the CE in the laser group was significantly higher than that in the drug group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LPNYL is effective and safe for treating OCTr. The energy density and treatment times are the main factors that affect the efficacy. The optimal regimen for LPNYL is an energy density of 45 J/cm2, pulse width of 35 ms, spot size of 4 mm, frequency of 1 Hz, and 6 treatments with 1-week intervals. Laser treatment has rapid clinical recovery.

Clinical laser treatment of toenail onychomycoses.

Onychomycoses are fungal infections of the fingernails or toenails having a prevalence of 3% among adults and accounts for 50% of nail infections. It is caused by dermatophytes, non-dermatophyte filamentous fungi, and yeasts. Compressions and microtraumas significantly contribute to onychomycosis. Laser and photodynamic therapies are being proposed to treat onychomycosis. Laser light (1064 nm) was used to treat onychomycosis in 156 affected toenails. Patients were clinically followed up for 9 months after treatment. Microbiological detection of fungal presence in lesions was accomplished. A total of 116 samples allowed the isolation of at least a fungus. Most of nails were affected in more than two thirds surface (some of them in the full surface). In 85% of cases, after 18 months of the onset of treatment, culture turned negative. After 3 months months, only five patients were completely symptom-free with negative culture. In 25 patients, only after 6 months, the absence of symptoms was achieved and the cultures negativized; in 29 patients, 9 months were required. No noticeable adverse effects were reported. This study reinforces previous works suggesting the applicability of laser therapies to treat toenail onychomycosis.

Complete cure of Fusarium solani sp. complex onychomycosis with Qs NdYAG treatment.

The incidence of non dermatophytic mould (NDM) onychomycosis (OM) has been steadily increasing Fusarium spp is the most common cause of NDM OM in most geographical locations. Fusarium spp and other NDMs are largely resistant to commonly used anti-fungals. The successful use of laser and light based devices has been demonstrated in dermatophytic OM, but there is no previous report of their successful use in any NDM OM. We describe a patient with OM caused by Fusarium solani spp, who was clinically (with a normal appearing nail) and mycologically (with negative microscopy and culture on repeated samples) cured of her infection following treatment with 2 sessions of Qs NdYAG (532nm and 1064nm) given 1 month apart.

Long-Pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG Laser for the Treatment of Onychomycosis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser in penetrating tissue and targeting the fungal overgrowth in the nail plate. BACKGROUND: Onychomycosis is the most frequent nail disorder. Current treatments include oral and topical antifungal agents, photodynamic therapy, and surgical approaches such as mechanical, chemical, or surgical nail avulsion. Moreover, the use of lasers to treat nail diseases has been approved in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Wide literature has been produced to assess the effectiveness of these devices, but, because the opposing results emerging from current studies, more data are still needed on the long-lasting efficacy and safety of this procedure. METHODS: Twenty consecutive, unselected patients were enrolled in the study and treated, at intervals of 1 week, for a total of four sessions, using a long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser. In each session, three passages across each nail plate were performed with 1-min pause between each passage. A special lens for dermatoscopy, connected to a digital camera, was used for dermoscopic images. RESULTS: In fourteen patients (70%; 12F; 3M), excellent results were obtained with an important reduction of chromonychia, onycholysis, opacity, longitudinal striae, and jagged proximal edge. Better results were observed in severe cases in the 2-month follow-up visit. CONCLUSIONS: Data for treating nail onychomycosis with laser and light therapy seem to be positive. The promising results of our study identify long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser as a possible alternative option for the treatment of onychomycosis. However, increasing subject data, improving study methodology, and output parameters may become an important next step of study in the treatment of nail onychomycosis.

Clinical trials of lasers for toenail onychomycosis: The implications of new regulatory guidance.

BACKGROUND: Despite the fact that lasers are presently indicated for the cosmetic outcome "temporary increase in clear nail", these devices are increasingly used to treat onychomycosis and particularly in patients who are unwilling or unable to take oral antifungal medication. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently issued draft guidance for medical device trials for onychomycosis. OBJECTIVE: This review evaluates the quality of laser trials for onychomycosis and compares the design guidelines for medical devices and antifungal drugs. METHOD: The PubMed database up to 29 May 2015 was searched for clinical studies of laser treatment for onychomycosis. RESULTS: The evidence demonstrating that lasers eradicate pathogenic fungi is limited and published laser trials suffer from limitations such as incomplete reporting of randomization and lack of stratified analyzes for fingernail/toenail data and infecting organisms. Differences in inclusion criteria and efficacy outcomes between drug and device guidelines may prevent the comparison of results from device and drug trials. CONCLUSION: We propose the standardization of device guidelines to match those of antifungal drug trials. Patients and physicians need to be aware of the capabilities and limitations of laser treatment for onychomycosis.

The effectiveness of 1,064-nm long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser in the treatment of severe onychomycosis.

INTRODUCTION: Severe onychomycosis in the elderly is a common condition and generally difficult to treat. Long-pulsed Nd:YAG (LPNY) laser has been found to be useful in the treatment of onychomycosis. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of 1,064-nm LPNY laser in the treatment of severe onychomycosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty nails in 13 patients with severe onychomycosis were divided into two groups. Each group received eight treatment sessions at one-week intervals with 1,064-nm LPNY laser. Parameters for group A were 0.3 ms pulse duration, 5 mm spot size, 16 J/cm(2) fluence, and 10 Hz frequency, and those for group B were 0.6 ms, 2 mm, 225 J/cm(2), and 5 Hz. Clinical and mycological clearance were evaluated at 12 and 24 weeks after initial treatment. RESULTS: Clinical improvements at 12 and 24 weeks presented 47.6 and 57.1% in group A, and 26.3 and 36.8% in group B. In the treated nails with clinical improvement, mycological positive rates at 24 weeks were approximately 40% in both groups. DISCUSSION: The treatment of onychomycosis using 1,064-nm LPNY laser were incomplete in clinical and mycological improvement, and it could imply a lot of potential recurrence. We suggest that 1,064-nm LPNY laser for severe onychomycosis should need additional or combined therapy with other therapeutic options.

Novel application of high-dose rate brachytherapy for severe, recalcitrant palmoplantar pustulosis.

Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a chronic pustular dermatitis of the palms and soles, which is frequently associated with significant pruritus and pain, often limiting daily activities. We present the case of a 36-year-old man with severe PPP who had treatment failure with multiple medical therapies but showed marked improvement with high-dose rate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy has the advantage of providing a conformal dose distribution over complex curved surfaces, such as the foot and ankle. Our observations suggest that brachytherapy may be a well-tolerated treatment option for patients with severe, refractory PPP.

Use of 308 nm excimer laser for the treatment of chronic hand and foot eczema.

BACKGROUND: Chronic hand and foot eczema (CHFE), a prevalent debilitating disorder affecting approximately 15% of the population, presents a socioeconomic and psychosocial burden for patients and often follows a chronic course, refractory to conventional therapies. Thus, a large need exists for more effective therapeutics; the excimer laser (308 nm) is effective for some inflammatory skin diseases, but its efficacy has not been evaluated for CHFE. METHODS: The study is a retrospective chart review conducted on 30 patients with recalcitrant CHFE (19 with hand involvement, four with foot involvement, and seven with both) treated twice weekly with excimer laser (308 nm) single wavelength ultraviolet (UV)B radiation between January 2013 and December 2014. RESULTS: Improvements in clinical scores included a 69% reduction in average physician's global assessment (PGA) scores (from 2.77 at baseline to 0.87 after treatment, P < 0.0001) with a parallel reduction in average modified total lesion/symptom scores of 70% (from 10.2 to 3.1, P < 0.0001). Only mild sunburn-like reactions were observed. CONCLUSION: This report evaluates excimer laser for patients with refractory CHFE and shows excellent and sustained efficacy for this treatment. Compared to other UV therapies, excimer laser offers lower cumulative doses of UV radiation by targeting specific areas. This effective treatment should be considered alone or in combination with other established or newer therapies.

Broad-band UVB versus paint PUVA for palmoplantar psoriasis treatment.

BACKGROUND: Plaque-type palmoplantar psoriasis (PPTP) is a chronic recalcitrant dermatosis with treatment modalities ranging through topical, phototherapy or systemic. Phototherapy options include various forms of ultraviolet B (UVB) and ultraviolet A with prior psoralen sensitization (PUVA). Currently, few comparative studies have been reported. PURPOSE: To compare Broad-Band UVB (BB-UVB) versus paint PUVA (p-PUVA) in regard to efficacy and safety in the treatment of PPTP. METHODS: A retrospective non-randomized cohort study comprised of all the patients with PPTP treated in our phototherapy centre during 2010-2012, either with BB-UVB or p-PUVA. RESULTS: Among the 248 patients included in this study, 122 received BB-UVB and 126 followed p-PUVA treatment. About 36 (30%) and 53 (42%) had complete remission, 29 (24%) and 59 (47%) responded partially and 57 (47%) and 14 (11%) patients did not improve with BB-UVB and p-PUVA, respectively. The odds ratio for remission (p-PUVA: BB-UVB) was 7.9. Duration of remission was 21.9 ± 1.34 months for p-PUVA and 16.75 ± 1.83 months for BB-UVB. CONCLUSION: Both BB-UVB and p-PUVA are good therapeutic options for PPTP. P-PUVA emerges as the superior treatment modality, yielding a better and more extended response. BB-UVB represents a feasible alternative in patients with milder disease or possible contraindications for p-PUVA.

Patient-reported outcomes after electron radiation treatment for early-stage palmar and plantar fibromatosis.

PURPOSE: Palmar and plantar fibromatosis (PPF) is a progressive connective tissue disorder of the hand/foot that often leads to debilitating functional impairment. In Europe, orthovoltage radiation therapy (RT) has been demonstrated to prevent local disease progression for up to 80% of patients with early-stage PPF. There are limited data reporting outcomes for populations outside of Europe or using electron RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2008 and 2013, 44 early-stage PPF cases received RT. RT fields involved clinically defined targets encompassing involved areas (skin changes, cords, nodules) with at least 1.5-cm margins. En face electrons (6-12 MeV) and bolus (0.5-1 cm) were selected individually. Outcomes are reported for patients who participated in an institutional review board-approved standardized questionnaire and chart review. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients received 66 treatments (45 hands/15 feet and 6 reirradiations). Most frequent dose schemes were 21 Gy (3 Gy in 7 fractions) and 30 Gy (3 Gy in 10 fractions with 6- to 8-week breaks after 15 Gy). Median time to follow-up survey was 31 months. Disease progression at any location within or outside the RT treatment field occurred in 20 of 33 patients (61%). Fourteen of 60 sites (23%) developed in-field progression, but 4 sites were successfully reirradiated with final local control in 50 of 60 sites (83%). RT improved pretreatment symptoms of pain with strain at 30 of 37 sites (81%) and itch/burn sensations at 17 of 21 sites (81%). There were no reported grade ≥2 late toxicities even with reirradiation. Patient reported overall success with treatment was 31 of 33 patients (94%). CONCLUSION: PPF is a progressive disease. En face electron RT is an effective therapy that stabilizes or improves symptoms in the majority of patients. Reirradiation can be considered as a treatment option for in-field progression. Patients report minimal toxicity and a high rate of satisfaction with treatment.

1,064-nm diode laser therapy of onychomycosis: results of a prospective open treatment of 82 toenails.

BACKGROUND: Onychomycosis is one of the most prevalent nail disorders in adults, where conventional topical therapy is often protracted and in most cases ineffective. On the other hand, systemic/oral therapy is not suitable for all patients and might be associated with relevant side effects. Therefore, laser therapy can be used as an alternative to or extension of existing treatment protocols. OBJECTIVES: We used diode laser treatment for onychomycosis to evaluate the efficacy of this treatment as single therapy as well as in combination with an ongoing antimycotic treatment. METHODS: We used a 1,064-nm diode laser (FOX Laser, ARC Laser GmbH, Germany) in pulse mode with a spot size of 4 mm. The laser's settings were: 8 W, with a pulse duration of 80 ms and a repetition rate of 5.6 Hz; the energy fluence/pulse was 5.1 J/cm(2), and a total energy of 250-500 J for large and/or thickened nails (digit I), 120-200 J for medium nails (digits II-IV) and 60-120 J for small and/or very thin nail plates (digit V) was counted in the laser display. Two to three passes where applied continuously over the entire area of the nail (nail plate, nail folds and eponychium) in a grid pattern. Eighty-two affected toenails were treated at least twice every 8 weeks; all nails treated were clinically diagnosed as onychomycosis. The evaluation of the treated nails was conducted by two dermatologists, initially by semiquantitative visual examination, followed by evaluation with the Onychomycosis Severity Index (OSI). In addition, the patients were asked to state their satisfaction with the treatment and its results in a written questionnaire. RESULTS: All nails showed an improvement ranging between 14 and 56% including the analytical evaluation scale (OSI). Two dermatologists evaluated 34 nails. Both reported significant improvement and/or good clinical improvement, which corresponds to about 41% for both evaluations. The mean OSI of all patients was 18.9/19.9 before treatment which changed to 14.3/14.8 after treatment. This corresponds to an improvement of about 25% (-4.6/-5.1) compared to the initial value. Specifically the subgroup with positive antimycotic culture and no additional antimycotic treatment showed an improvement of about 25%. This improvement can be attributed to the effect of the diode laser treatment. When evaluating the OSI of all nails, it appears that about 15-20% of the severe OSIs improved and changed to a moderate level, while a similar portion of patients with moderate onychomycosis improved to mild onychomycosis. Patient satisfaction was measured to an average value of 4.6 out of a maximum of 10 points. About 60% of the treated patients would recommend the treatment to their family members or friends. CONCLUSION: This investigation demonstrated that diode laser treatment of onychomycosis provides acceptable results with minimal to no side effects. Further clinical evaluations could help to establish better therapy protocols, especially for those patients who had no benefit from the laser treatment, or could also be used as an add-on to an existing therapy.

Onychomycosis: 1064-nm Nd:YAG q-switch laser treatment.

BACKGROUND: Laser Treatment of onychomycosis is a quick and easy method without complications. AIM: Laser therapy is efficient for the Treatment of onychomycosis. MATERIAL & METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients with a KOH (+) confirmed clinical diagnosis of onychomycosis were included in this study, all of the patients were treated in a single sesión with a 1064-nm neodymium-doped yttrium-aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) q-switch laser. RESULTS: There was a 100% clinical response rate within the 9 month follow-up period with no side effects. CONCLUSIÓN: This method is proposed as a novel and safe method for the treatment of this ungual pathology.

The effectiveness of grenz ray therapy for chronic dermatoses of the hands and feet.

BACKGROUND: Grenz ray therapy (GRT) has been used for inflammatory and neoplastic dermatologic diseases for over 100 years. Its use is declining, possibly because of the difficulties maintaining radiation certification and insurance coverage. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of GRT in chronic inflammatory dermatoses of the hands and feet. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients treated with GRT at the Oregon Health & Science University from 2006 to 2009. Candidates identified for the study were then mailed questionnaires to supplement data acquired from chart review. RESULTS: Most patients (73%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 65%-80%) experienced at least moderate improvement. This improvement persisted for at least 1 month in 66% of patients (95% CI, 57%-74%), with 18 patients (23%; 95% CI, 15%-33%) clear for over 1 year. Minimal adverse effects were reported, and most patients (63%; 95% CI, 52%-72%) stated that they would repeat GRT if available. CONCLUSIONS: Grenz ray therapy seems to be a safe and effective modality for chronic hand and foot dermatoses with some patients experiencing prolonged remissions. Grenz ray therapy, when available, should be considered before the use of systemic agents, which are often associated with higher costs and potential toxicities.