Assessing the impact of glazing and window shade systems on view clarity.

Windows provide access to daylight and outdoor views, influencing building design. Various glazing and window shade materials are used to mitigate glare, overheating and privacy issues, and they affect view clarity. Among them, we evaluated the effect of window films, electrochromic (EC) glass, and fabric shades on view clarity. We conducted an experiment with 50 participants using visual tests adapted from clinical vision tests (visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, color sensitivity) and images displayed on a computer monitor in a controlled laboratory. Window films and EC glass tints outperformed fabric shades in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and view satisfaction with the exception of the darkest EC tint state and dark grey VLT 3% shade for color sensitivity and view satisfaction. The EC tints pose internal reflection issues and fabric shades are preferred for visual privacy. Window films and EC glass hinder participants' blue-green color discrimination while fabric shades also decrease red-yellow color discrimination. Visual acuity predicts view satisfaction and contrast sensitivity is the strongest predictor for visual privacy. Generally, higher visible light transmittance and lower solar reflectance (darker color) enhance human visual performance. The proposed workflow provides an experimental procedure, identifies the primary variables and establishes a predictive framework for assessing view clarity of fenestration.

Impact and visualization of scotomatic glare in central visual field perception.

Strong monochromatic point light sources such as Light Emitting Diodes (LED) or Lasers have been increasingly used in recent decades. This also raises the risk of misuse resulting in glare phenomena and associated visual impairment. The objective of this prospective and partially blinded study was the visualization and characterization of glare-induced scotomas in visual field by dazzling with monochromatic point light sources in terms of disability and discomfort glare. Automated threshold perimetry under dazzling by LED exposure at three different wavelengths (470, 530 and 625 nm) and four different intensities (25, 50, 75, and 100%) was performed in 31 healthy subjects resulting in 434 visual field examinations. Visual disability was measured by sensitivity loss in the central 30°as compared to unexposed controls and visualized by reconstruction of mean visual fields for each group via backward-calculation. Psychological glare was assessed by subsequent questionnaire and evaluated based on the de Boer rating scale of discomfort. Increasing glare intensities resulted in a significant decrease in mean sensitivity for all wavelengths tested, paralleled by an increase of discomfort glare. The loss of sensitivity was scattered over all quadrants with accentuation of the corresponding mean exposure area. Reconstructed visual fields confirmed visual impairment in all quadrants at an extent of at least 30°. We conclude that even off-axis light exposure may affect central visual field perception. Our results extend previous research on directed light interaction and contribute in explaining its incapacitating impact on human performance.

Evaluation of contrast sensitivity in patients with congenital red-green color vision deficiency.

PURPOSE: To evaluate mesopic and photopic contrast sensitivity in patients with congenital red-green color vision deficiency regarding with and without glare conditions and to compare these findings with age- and gender-matched healthy controls with normal color vision. METHODS: Patients with congenital red-green color vision deficiency and age- and gender-matched healthy controls were included in this cross-sectional comparative study. Contrast sensitivity measurements were taken from all subjects in 4 different conditions; binocular mesopic-without glare, mesopic-with glare, photopic-without glare, photopic-with glare, and the results were compared. RESULTS: Twenty one patients with color vision deficiency (13 deuteranopic, 8 protanopic) and 22 age- and gender-matched healthy controls were included in the study. The mean age was 35.2 ± 13.5 years in the protan group, 30.6 ± 7.7 years in the deutan group, 32.0 ± 8.8 years in the control group, and there was no significant difference in age between the groups (P > 0.05). The mean mesopic and photopic contrast sensitivity values of the groups at all spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, 6, 12, 18 cpd) were not statistically significant when evaluated by the multifactor repeated measures test of ANOVA to evaluate the effect of light conditions (with and without glare) (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Mesopic and photopic contrast sensitivity values of patients with congenital red-green color vision deficiency were similar to healthy controls regarding with and without glare conditions.

Influence of lighting on visual performance.

PURPOSE: This review emphasizes the effect of light on visual efficiency, the impact of different lighting focuses, types of lighting, and their influence on vision and productivity. Light sources and standards are intriguing subjects for ophthalmologists. Guidelines regarding the level of lighting influence on visual activities can enhance visual performance.Methods: This article was developed based on literature reviews, with a bibliographic survey conducted in databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, LILACS, and SciELO. RESULTS: Provides recommendations for understanding information regarding the influence of lighting on visual performance. CONCLUSION: Proper workplace lighting is crucial for improving visual efficiency, safety, productivity, and worker health. Efficient workplace lighting should avoid light sources directed towards the worker's face, prevent harmful glare, be more intense in the work area, and uniform in the rest of the room. Ophthalmologists should be knowledgeable about and provide guidance on correct lighting to ensure patient comfort and satisfaction with visual correction.

Flicker and reading speed: Effects on individuals with visual sensitivity.

Flicker and patterns of stripes in the modern environment can evoke visual illusions, discomfort migraine, and seizures. We measured reading speed while striped and less striped texts were illuminated with LED lights. In Experiment 1, the lights flickered at 60 Hz and 120 Hz compared to 60 kHz (perceived as steady light). In Experiment 2, the lights flickered at 60 Hz or 600 Hz (at which frequency the phantom array is most visible), and were compared to continuous light. Two types of text were used: one containing words with high horizontal autocorrelation (striped) and another containing words with low autocorrelation (less striped). We measured the number of illusions participants saw in the Pattern Glare (PG) Test. Overall, reading speed was slowest during the 60 Hz and 600 Hz flicker and was slower when reading the high autocorrelation text. Interestingly, the low PG group showed greater effects of flicker on reading speed than the high PG group, which tended to be slower overall. In addition, reading speed in the high PG group was reduced when the autocorrelation of the text was high. These findings suggest that uncomfortable visual environments reduce reading efficiency, the more so in individuals who are visually sensitive.

Pattern glare sensitivity distinguishes subclinical autism and schizotypy.

INTRODUCTION: Schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder are distinct neurodevelopmental disorders sharing clinically relevant behaviours. However, early sensory responses show divergent responses. Individuals with schizophrenia typically exhibit cortical hypo-excitability whereas individuals with autism show cortical hyperexcitability. Identifying reliable neurobiological differences between the disorders can diminish misdiagnosis and optimise treatments. METHODS: The pattern glare test (PGT) is a simple measure of behavioural hyperexcitability. It measures the number of illusions seen in a static horizontal grating. We collected PGT data from non-clinical adults varying in traits of autism and schizophrenia (schizotypy). 576 undergraduate students completed an online survey consisting of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire - Brief Revised, the Autism Spectrum Quotient, and the PGT. RESULTS: Subclinical autism and schizotypy traits were highly positively correlated. However, only schizotypy scores were significantly predictive of reporting more pattern glare (PG) illusions. When assessing the subcomponents of the schizotypy and autism scores, positive and disorganised schizotypy traits were predictive of reporting more PG illusions. Whereas, subclinical autism factors were not predictive of PG illusions. CONCLUSIONS: High schizotypy performed the PGT in a manner consistent with behavioural hyperexcitability. The PGT distinguished subclinical autistic traits from schizotypy, suggesting potential clinical application.

Mesopic pupil indices as potential risk factors for glare disability after intraocular implantable collamer lens implantation: prospective study.

PURPOSE: To explore the influence of preoperative factors, including varying pupil sizes and refractive attributes, on postoperative glare disability in patients undergoing implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation. SETTING: Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. METHODS: The preoperative ocular characteristics and 6-month postoperative glare status in eligible patients who underwent EVO-Visian ICL V4c (VICMO) implantation were analyzed. The glare disability criteria encompassed a glare symptom score >6 and glare sensitivity exceeding 1:2.7. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the relationship between the preoperative ocular parameters and post-ICL glare. RESULTS: The study included 95 patients (mean age, 26.04 ± 6.29 years), comprising 30 men (58 eyes) and 65 women (129 eyes). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant correlation between postoperative glare disability and increased spherical power in preoperative mesopic pupils (ß = -0.124, P = .039), as well as elevated cylinder power in preoperative mesopic (ß = -0.412, P = .009) and photopic pupils (ß = -0.430, P = .007). Moreover, a larger preoperative mesopic pupil diameter (ß = 0.561, P = .005) demonstrated a significant correlation with glare disability. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative mesopic pupil dimensions and associated refractive parameters, such as sphere and cylinder, were correlated with glare disability, including the cylinder aspect in photopic pupils, which can assist clinicians in optimizing preoperative selection for ICL implantation, aiding in the anticipation of potential glare disability risks.

Pupil size measurements with a multifunctional aberrometer/coherence interferometer/tomographer and two infrared-based pupillometers.

PURPOSE: To compare precision of pupil size measurements of a multifunctional device (Pentacam AXL Wave [Pentacam]) and 2 infrared-based pupillometers (PupilX, Colvard) and to compare repeatability of Pentacam and PupilX. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. DESIGN: Prospective, comparative trial. METHODS: Pupil diameter of healthy eyes was measured with Colvard once and Pentacam without glare (WO) and with glare (WG), PupilX in 0, 1, and 16 lux 3 times each. In a second series, measurements with Pentacam WO and PupilX in 0.06 and 0.12 lux were assessed. RESULTS: 36 eyes of participants aged 21 to 63 years were included. Mean pupil diameter was 6.05 mm with Colvard, 5.79 mm (first series), 5.50 mm (second series) with Pentacam WO, 3.42 mm WG, 7.26 mm PupilX in 0, 4.67 mm 1, 3.66 mm 16, 6.82 mm in 0.06, and 6.39 mm in 0.12 lux. Measurements with Pentacam WO were significantly different to PupilX in 0, 0.06, 0.12, and 1 lux (all P < .001), but not to Colvard ( P = .086). Pupil size measured with Pentacam WG and PupilX in 16 lux was not significantly different ( P = .647). Consecutive measurements with Pentacam WO and WG had mean SD of 0.23 mm and 0.20 mm, respectively, and with PupilX 0.11 in 0, 0.24 mm 1, and 0.20 mm in 16 lux. CONCLUSIONS: Pentacam provided good assessment of pupil size but was not equivalent to PupilX in low lighting conditions. Repeatability was more favorable for Pentacam.

Characterizing glare effects associated with diffractive optics in presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To objectively quantify glare of intraocular lenses (IOLs) using a diffractive principle to extend the visual range and to identify models with increased susceptibility to inducing glare. SETTING: David J Apple Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany. DESIGN: Laboratory investigation. METHODS: Glare was assessed by means of a straylight parameter with a standard C-Quant intended for 7 degrees. In addition, 2 C-Quant modifications were used to test lower angles (ie, 2.5 degrees and 3.5 degrees). The following IOL models were assessed: PanOptix, AT Lisa Tri, Synergy, and Triumf, the latter 2 with chromatic aberration correction at distance. Straylight from trifocal IOLs was compared against a monofocal W-60R lens. The C-Quant test was performed through the studied IOLs by using additional optical components attached to their ocular. RESULTS: Straylight (deg 2 sr -1 ) of the control was <1 at all tested angles, with the trifocal models showing comparable straylight at 7 degrees. At 3.5 degrees, Triumf's straylight increased to 15.5 ± 0.6, followed by Synergy (6.2 ± 1.1), PanOptix (4.1 ± 0.3), and AT Lisa Tri (2.0 ± 0.8). The chromatic aberration-correcting models demonstrated correspondingly higher straylight (Synergy: 18.8 ± 1.3; Triumf: 17.3 ± 0.5) at 2.5 degrees compared with PanOptix (4.3 ± 0.4), AT Lisa Tri (2.1 ± 0.1), and monofocal IOLs yielding minimal or no increase. CONCLUSIONS: Trifocal IOLs induced increased straylight, but it was limited to lower angles, which may cause difficulties detecting these effects using a standard clinical approach. The latest IOL designs featuring chromatic aberration correction at far focus seem more susceptible than the established trifocal IOLs to inducing a glare phenomenon.

Visual function correlates of self-reported vision-related nighttime driving difficulties.

PURPOSE: To investigate the visual function correlates of self-reported vision-related night driving difficulties among drivers. METHODS: One hundred and seven drivers (age: 46.06 ± 8.24, visual acuity [VA] of 0.2logMAR or better) were included in the study. A standard vision and night driving questionnaire (VND-Q) was administered. VA and contrast sensitivity were measured under photopic and mesopic conditions. Mesopic VA was remeasured after introducing a peripheral glare source into the participants' field of view to enable computation of disability glare index. Regression analyses were used to assess the associations between VND-Q scores, and visual function measures. RESULTS: The mean VND-Q score was -3.96±1.95 logit (interval scale score: 2.46±1.28). Simple linear regression models for photopic contrast sensitivity, mesopic VA, mesopic contrast sensitivity, and disability index significantly predicted VND-Q score (P<0.05), with mesopic VA and disability glare index accounting for the greatest variation (21 %) in VND-Q scores followed by photopic contrast sensitivity (19 %), and mesopic contrast sensitivity (15 %). A multiple regression model to determine the association between the predictors (photopic contrast sensitivity, mesopic VA, mesopic contrast sensitivity, and disability index) and VND-Q score yielded significant results, F (4, 102) = 8.58, P < 0.001, adj. R2 = 0.2224. Seeing dark-colored cars was the most challenging vision task. CONCLUSION: Changes in mesopic visual acuity, photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity, as well as disability glare index are associated with and explain night driving-related visual difficulties. It is recommended to incorporate measurement of these visual functions into assessments related to driving performance.

Influence of macular pigment on the sensitivity to discomfort glare from daylight.

Understanding the factors that influence the human perception of glare is necessary to properly address glare risks in buildings and achieve comfortable visual environments, especially in the workplace. Yet large inter-individual variabilities in glare perception remain unexplained and thus uncovered by the current empirical glare models. We hypothesize that this variability has an origin in the human retina, in particular in the density of macular pigments present in its central area, which varies between individuals. Macular pigments are known to absorb blue light and attenuate chromatic aberration, thus reducing light scatter. This study presents the outcomes of the first experiment ever conducted in a daylit office environment, in which glare sensitivity and macular pigment density were measured and compared for 110 young healthy individuals, along with other ocular parameters. The participants were exposed to different glare conditions induced by the sun filtered through either color-neutral or blue-colored glazing. In neutral daylight conditions with sun disc in the near periphery, neither macular pigment nor any other investigated ocular factors have an impact on discomfort glare perception whereas glare perception in conditions with the blue-colored sun disc in the near periphery was found to be correlated with macular pigment optical density.

Comparing microscope light-associated glare and comfort between heads-up 3D digital and conventional microscopes in cataract surgery: a randomised, multicentre, single-blind, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare subjective levels of comfort and visual experiences related to microscope light in patients undergoing their first cataract surgery with topical anaesthesia using a digital microscope (the NGENUITY three-dimensional (3D) visualisation system) or a conventional microscope. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective, randomised, single-blinded, parallel-group, multicentre, interventional study. Patients (n=128) were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: the experimental group (n=63) had surgery using the digital microscope and the control group (n=65) had surgery with a conventional microscope. The primary outcome was patients' subjective experience of glare from the microscope light during surgery on a numerical scale from 0 to 10. Key secondary outcomes were patients' subjective levels of comfort and visual experiences related to the microscope light. RESULTS: The experimental group reported significantly lower levels of glare; median levels were 1.0 (0.0-4.0) for the experimental group vs 3.0 (0.0-6.0) for the control group (p=0.027). They also reported higher levels of comfort; median ratings were 8.0 (6.5-10.0) in the experimental group and 7.0 (5.0-9.0) in controls (p=0.026). There were no group differences in ratings of subjective pain or visual disturbances. Median microscope light intensity was lower in the experimental group than controls; 3425.0 (2296.0-4300.0) Lux vs 24 279.0 (16 000.0-26 500.0) Lux (p<0.0001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional microscopes, the NGENUITY 3D visualisation system allows surgeons to operate with lower levels of light exposure, resulting in significantly less glare and improved comfort in patients undergoing cataract surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05085314.

Influencing Factors of Glare in Patients With Myopia After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction.

PURPOSE: To investigate influencing factors of glare in patients with myopia after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS: Thirty patients (60 eyes) aged 24.9 ± 4.5 years with spherical equivalent of -6.69 ± 1.10 diopters (D) and astigmatism of -1.25 ± 0.76 D who underwent SMILE were consecutively recruited in this prospective study. Visual acuity, subjective refraction, Pentacam corneal topography (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH), pupillometry, and glare test (Monpack One; Metrovision) were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. All patients were followed up for 6 months. The generalized estimation equation was used to judge the determinants of glare after SMILE, and a P value less than .05 was statistically significant. RESULTS: Under mesopic conditions, the halo radii preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months after SMILE were 207.72 ± 46.67, 216.17 ± 40.63, 200.67 ± 34.68, and 193.50 ± 40.75 minutes of arc (arcmin), respectively. Under photopic conditions, the glare radii were 79.10 ± 17.78, 87.00 ± 20.44, 78.00 ± 14.59, and 72.00 ± 15.27 arcmin, respectively. Compared with preoperative glare, no significant changes were detected in postoperative glare. However, glare at 6 months was statistically significantly improved compared to the values at 1 month (both P < .05). Under mesopic conditions, the main influencing factors of glare were sphere (P = .007), astigmatism (P = .032), uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) (P < .001), and postoperative time (all P < .05). Under photopic conditions, the main influencing factors of glare were astigmatism, UDVA, and postoperative time (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Glare improved with time during the early stages after SMILE for myopia. Less glare was found to be associated with better UDVA, and greater residual astigmatism and sphere translated to more obvious glare. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(6):398-404.].

Customized designed notch filters and applied effects on glare and contrast sensitivity in patients with dry eye syndrome.

PURPOSE: Glare visual acuity and contrast sensitivity are important indicators of visual quality. Studies have shown that the glare visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in dry eye patients tend to degenerate, further affecting their quality of life. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of notch filters on glare VA and contrast sensitivity in patients with dry eye or with dry eye syndrome. METHOD: 36 subjects in the 20‒65 age group were diagnosed as having dry eye disease or perceived dry eye syndromes themselves who were included after the initial screening with the OSDI questionnaire, and one was subsequently excluded as they had undergone retinal detachment surgery. Finally, 35 subjects (14 male and 21 female) with a mean age of 40.66 ± 15.62 years participated in this study. All subjects wore their habitual prescriptions and four different filter lenses (namely 480, 620, dual 480 & 620 notch filter, and FL-41 tinted lens), and measured the parameters of glare visual acuity and contrast sensitivity using CSV-1000 and sine wave contrast test (SWCT), respectively. Student t-test and Repeated measurement analysis (R-ANOVA) were utilized by using SPSS 26.0 software. RESULTS: A dual-wavelength 480 & 620 nm optical notch filter had a significant anti-glare effect decreasing glare disabilities or discomfort, and leading to better visual quality, the same effect was also shown on a 480 nm notch filter lens. All participants showed a significant difference among the baseline, three notch filters (480 nm, 620 nm, dual-wavelength 480 & 620 nm), and FL-41 tinted lens were used on SWCT_A (1.5 cpd, F = 3.054, p = 0.019) and SWCT_E (18 cpd, F = 2.840, p = 0.049); but did not show statistical different on SWCT_B (3 cpd, F = 0.333, p = 0.771), SWCT_C (6 cpd, F = 1.779, p = 0.159), and SWCT_D (12 cpd, F = 1.447, p = 0.228). The baseline showed the best visual performance on CS at a low spatial frequency (SWCT_A, 1.5 cpd), any filter might reduce the contrast sensitivity at low spatial frequencies in the clinical trial, whereas 480 nm notch filter showed the best effectiveness on CS at a high spatial frequency (SWCT_E, 18 cpd), the FL-41 lens that also filters out the 480 nm band does not achieve the same effect. Moreover, patients with dry eye or those older than 40 years old preferred optical multilayer notch filters to FL-41 tinted lenses. CONCLUSION: The 480- & 620-nm dual-wavelength and 480-nm single-wavelength notch filters have the best effect on the glare visual acuity and contrast sensitivity (CS) at high spatial frequencies in dry eye patients. The 620-nm notch filter performs better in CS at low and mid-low spatial frequencies; the FL-41 tinted lens performs poorly for glare VA and CS spatial frequencies examination. Patients with glare disabilities or CS disturbance at high spatial frequencies may choose a 480-nm notch filter lens, and patients who have CS disturbance at low spatial frequencies may consider a 620-nm notch filter for the prescription.

The dynamic changes and influencing factors of visual symptoms after small incision lenticule extraction.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the dynamic changes and influencing factors of visual symptoms after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS: This was a prospective observational study. Visual symptoms including glare, haloes, starbursts, hazy vision, fluctuation, blurred vision, double vision and focusing difficulties were evaluated before and 1, 3, 6 months after SMILE using a questionnaire. Generalized linear mixed models were used to assess the effects of preoperative characteristics and objective visual quality parameters on postoperative visual symptoms. RESULTS: 73 patients/146 eyes were enrolled. Preoperatively, the most common symptoms were glare (55% of eyes), haloes (48%), starbursts (44%) and blurred vision (37%). At 1 month postoperatively, the incidence and extent scores of glare, haloes, hazy vision and fluctuation rose significantly. At 3 months, the incidence and extent scores of glare, haloes and hazy vision restored to baseline. And at 6 months, the extent scores of fluctuation returned to baseline. Other symptoms (e.g., starbursts) did not change before and 1, 3, 6 months after SMILE. Preoperative visual symptoms were associated with postoperative symptoms, as patients with a symptom preoperatively had higher postoperative scores for that symptom. Age was related to postoperative extent of double vision (coefficient = 0.12, P = 0.046). There were no significant associations between postoperative visual symptoms and preoperative SE, scotopic pupil size, angle kappa (with intraoperative adjustment), postoperative HOAs or scattering indexes. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and extent scores of hazy vision, glare, haloes and fluctuation increased at the first month after SMILE, and recovered to baseline at 3 or 6 months. Preoperative visual symptoms were associated with the postoperative symptoms and should be fully considered before SMILE.

The Effects of Blue-Light Filtering Intraocular Implants on Glare Geometry.

PURPOSE: One common complaint with natural opacified lenses is the deleterious effects of higher-order ocular aberrations and intraocular scatter, such as halos and starbursts, which are not always remedied with surgery and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Blue-light filtering (BLF) IOL filter scatter-prone short-wave light. Here, we determine whether BLF IOL reduce halo and starburst size. METHODS: This study was a case-control design, between- and within-subjects (contralateral implantation). Sixty-nine participants with either the BLF IOL (n = 25; AlconSN60AT), clear IOL (n = 24; AlconSA60AT or WF), or both (n = 20) IOL participated. Participants were exposed to a point source of broadband simulated sunlight, which created the appearance of halos/starbursts. Dysphotopsia was measured as the diameter of broadband light-induced halos and starbursts. RESULTS: A case-control analysis. Halo size was significantly larger (t[35.05] = 2.98, p = 0.005) in participants with the clear control lens (M = 3°55' ± 2°48'), compared to the BLF IOL (M = 1°84' ± 1°34'). Starburst size was not significantly different between groups. Contralateral analysis. Halo size was significantly smaller (t = -3.89, p = .001) in test eyes with the BLF (M = 3°16' ± 2°35') compared to the fellow control eyes (M = 5°42' ± 3°17'). Starburst size was also significantly smaller (t = -2.60, p < 0.018) in BLF test eyes (M = 9°57' ± 4°25') than the fellow eye with the clear IOL (M = 12°33' ± 5°25'). CONCLUSIONS: BLF IOL filter short-wave light and mimic retinal screening by the young, natural crystalline lens. Such filtering can reduce some deleterious effects of bright light by decreasing ocular diffusion/halos and starbursts.

A study on disability glare vision in young adult subjects.

The full assessment of the visual system must include the evaluation of the optical quality of the eye and neural visual functions. The objective evaluation of the retinal image quality is often carried out by computing the point spread function (PSF) of the eye. The central part of the PSF is associated with optical aberrations and the peripheral areas with scattering contributions. In that sense, visual acuity and contrast sensitivity function tests can be considered the perceptual neural response to those contributions characterizing the eye's PSF. However, in natural viewing conditions, visual acuity tests may provide good vision while contrast sensitivity tests can reveal visual impairment in glare vision conditions, such as exposure to bright light sources or night driving conditions. Here we present an optical instrument for the study of disability glare vision under extended Maxwellian illumination to assess the contrast sensitivity function under glare conditions. The limit of the Total Disability Glare threshold, tolerance, and glare adaptation will be investigated as a function of the angular size of the glare source (GA) and the contrast sensitivity function in young adult subjects.

Changes in Shape Discrimination Sensitivity Under Glare Conditions After Orthokeratology in Myopic Children: A Prospective Study.

Purpose: To investigate changes in shape discrimination under mesopic conditions with and without glare after orthokeratology in myopic children. Methods: This prospective study included 79 eyes of 79 myopic children (ages: 8-16 years). Shape discrimination thresholds (SDTs) were measured using radial frequency patterns, with a radial frequency of 4 cycles/360°, a peak spatial frequency of 3 cycles per degree, a contrast of 20%, and a mean radius of 1.5 degrees. SDT under mesopic conditions with and without glare was measured before orthokeratology and again at 1 week and 1 month after orthokeratology. Changes in the SDTs and their relationships to baseline ocular parameters were analyzed. Results: SDTs with glare decreased significantly at 1 week (-0.08 ± 0.15 log(arcsec), P < 0.001) and 1 month (-0.09 ± 0.15 log(arcsec), P < 0.001) after orthokeratology. SDTs without glare remained stable (P = 0.81 and P = 1.00, respectively). The difference between SDTs with and without glare also decreased significantly at 1 week (-0.10 ± 0.17 log(arcsec), P < 0.001) and at 1 month (-0.08 ± 0.18 log(arcsec), P = 0.001) after orthokeratology. Based on a multivariate analysis, the greater decrease in SDT with glare after 1 month of orthokeratology was associated with a higher baseline spherical equivalent refraction. Conclusions: Orthokeratology resulted in improved shape discrimination in myopic children under mesopic conditions but only when measured in the presence of glare.

People with high schizotypy experience more illusions in the Pattern Glare Test: Consistent with the hyperexcitability hypothesis.

Individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) exhibit a constellation of sensory and perceptual impairments, including hyporeactivity to external input. However, individuals with SSD also report subjective experiences of sensory flooding, suggesting sensory hyperexcitability. To identify the extent to which behavioural indices of hyperexcitability are related to non-psychotic symptoms of schizophrenia, we tested a non-clinical population measured for schizophrenia-like traits (schizotypy), and a behavioural measure of sensory hyperexcitability, specifically the number of illusions seen in the Pattern Glare Test. Two samples totaling 913 individuals completed an online version of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire - Brief Revised (SPQ-BR) and the Pattern Glare Test. Individuals with higher schizotypy traits reported more illusions in the Pattern Glare Test. Additionally, one of the three SPQ-BR factors, the disorganized factor, significantly predicted the number of illusions reported. These data illustrate the potential for research in non-clinical samples to inform clinically relevant research.