Assessment of lisdexamfetamine on executive function in rats: A translational cognitive research.

Executive function, including working memory, attention and inhibitory control, is crucial for decision making, thinking and planning. Lisdexamfetamine, the prodrug of d-amphetamine, has been approved for treating attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and binge eating disorder, but whether it improves executive function under non-disease condition, as well as the underlying pharmacokinetic and neurochemical properties, remains unclear. Here, using trial unique non-matching to location task and five-choice serial reaction time task of rats, we found lisdexamfetamine (p.o) enhanced spatial working memory and sustained attention under various cognitive load conditions, while d-amphetamine (i.p) only improved these cognitive performances under certain high cognitive load condition. Additionally, lisdexamfetamine evoked less impulsivity than d-amphetamine, indicating lower adverse effect on inhibitory control. In vivo pharmacokinetics showed lisdexamfetamine produced a relative stable and lasting release of amphetamine base both in plasma and in brain tissue, whereas d-amphetamine injection elicited rapid increase and dramatical decrease in amphetamine base levels. Microdialysis revealed lisdexamfetamine caused lasting release of dopamine within the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), whereas d-amphetamine produced rapid increase followed by decline to dopamine level. Moreover, lisdexamfetamine elicited more obvious efflux of noradrenaline than that of d-amphetamine. The distinct neurochemical profiles may be partly attributed to the different action of two drugs to membranous catecholamine transporters level within mPFC, detecting by Western Blotting. Taken together, due to its certain pharmacokinetic and catecholamine releasing profiles, lisdexamfetamine produced better pharmacological action to improving executive function. Our finding provided valuable evidence on the ideal pharmacokinetic and neurochemical characteristics of amphetamine-type psychostimulants in cognition enhancement.

Prescription Stimulant Use During Pregnancy and Risk of Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Children.

Importance: Use of medications for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) during pregnancy is increasing in the US. Whether exposure to these medications in utero impacts the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in children is uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the association of childhood neurodevelopmental disorders with in utero exposure to stimulant medications for ADHD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included health care utilization data from publicly insured (Medicaid data from 2000 to 2018) and commercially insured (MarketScan Commercial Claims Database data from 2003 to 2020) pregnant individuals aged 12 to 55 years in the US with enrollment from 3 months prior to pregnancy through 1 month after delivery, linked to children. Children were monitored from birth until outcome diagnosis, disenrollment, death, or end of the study (December 2018 for Medicaid and December 2020 for MarketScan). Exposures: Dispensing of amphetamine/dextroamphetamine or methylphenidate in the second half of pregnancy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Autism spectrum disorder, ADHD, and a composite of any neurodevelopmental disorder were defined using validated algorithms. Hazard ratios were estimated comparing amphetamine/dextroamphetamine and methylphenidate to no exposure. Results: The publicly insured cohort included 2 496 771 stimulant-unexposed, 4693 amphetamine/dextroamphetamine-exposed, and 786 methylphenidate-exposed pregnancies with a mean (SD) age of 25.2 (6.0) years. The commercially insured cohort included 1 773 501 stimulant-unexposed, 2372 amphetamine/dextroamphetamine-exposed, and 337 methylphenidate-exposed pregnancies with a mean (SD) age of 31.6 (4.6) years. In unadjusted analyses, amphetamine/dextroamphetamine and methylphenidate exposure were associated with a 2- to 3-fold increased risk of the neurodevelopmental outcomes considered. After adjustment for measured confounders, amphetamine/dextroamphetamine exposure was not associated with any outcome (autism spectrum disorder: hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56-1.14]; ADHD: HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.89-1.28; any neurodevelopmental disorder: HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.81-1.28). Methylphenidate exposure was associated with an increased risk of ADHD (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.12-1.82]) but not other outcomes after adjustment (autism spectrum disorder: HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.62-1.81; any neurodevelopmental disorder: HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.97-1.36). The association between methylphenidate and ADHD did not persist in sensitivity analyses with stricter control for confounding by maternal ADHD. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings in this study suggest that amphetamine/dextroamphetamine and methylphenidate exposure in utero are not likely to meaningfully increase the risk of childhood neurodevelopmental disorders.

d-Amphetamine Transdermal System in Treatment of Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Secondary Endpoint Results and Post Hoc Effect Size Analyses from a Pivotal Trial.

Objectives: Amphetamines are a preferred treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), with the dextroamphetamine transdermal system (d-ATS) providing an alternative to oral formulations. A pivotal trial of d-ATS in children and adolescents with ADHD met primary and key secondary endpoints. This analysis reports additional endpoints and safety findings from the pivotal trial and evaluates effect size and number needed to treat (NNT) for d-ATS. Methods: In this study, a 5-week, open-label dose-optimization period (DOP) preceded a 2-week, randomized, crossover double-blind treatment period (DBP). Eligible patients received d-ATS 5 mg during the DOP, with weekly evaluations for increase to 10, 15, and 20 mg (equivalent to labeled doses of 4.5, 9, 13.5, and 18 mg/9 hours, respectively) until reaching and maintaining the optimal dose, which was utilized for the DBP. Secondary endpoints included assessment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale IV (ADHD-RS-IV), Conners' Parent Rating Scale Revised Short Form (CPRS-R:S), and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scores. NNT was calculated for ADHD-RS-IV and CGI-Improvement (CGI-I). Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and dermal safety. Results: In total, 110 patients entered the DOP, with 106 patients randomized (DBP). During the DBP, the least-squares mean (95% confidence interval) difference for d-ATS versus placebo in ADHD-RS-IV total score was -13.1 (-16.2 to -10.0; p < 0.001), with effect size of 1.1 and NNT of 3 for ADHD-RS-IV remission, ≥30% improvement, and ≥50% improvement. Significant differences between placebo and d-ATS were also observed for CPRS-R:S and CGI-I scales (p < 0.001), with NNT of 2 for CGI-I response. Most TEAEs were mild or moderate, with three leading to study discontinuation in the DOP and none in the DBP. No patients discontinued due to dermal reactions. Conclusions: d-ATS was effective in treating ADHD in children and adolescents, meeting all secondary endpoints, with a large effect size and NNT of 2-3 to achieve a clinically meaningful response. d-ATS was safe and well tolerated, with minimal dermal reactions. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01711021.

Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Extended-Release Methylphenidate (PRC-063) in the Treatment of ADHD in Pediatric and Adult Subjects: Results of a Phase IV Multicenter Comparison With Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the real-world efficacy, safety, and functional outcomes of PRC-063 (multilayer-release methylphenidate) versus lisdexamfetamine (LDX) in ADHD subjects in a phase IV, open-label study. METHOD: The primary endpoint was the change in the ADHD-DSM-5 Rating Scale (ADHD-5-RS) total score from baseline to Month 4. Secondary endpoints included a non-inferiority comparison between PRC-063 and LDX and measures of functioning and evening behavior. RESULTS: One hundred forty-three pediatric and 112 adult subjects were enrolled. Mean ADHD-5-RS scores (standard deviation) were reduced in pediatric (-16.6 [10.4]) and adult (-14.8 [10.6]) subjects treated with PRC-063 (p < .001). PRC-063 was non-inferior to LDX in the pediatric population but not in the adult population. Significant improvements were demonstrated in quality of life and functionality. Both medications were well-tolerated; more adverse events led to study discontinuation in pediatric subjects treated with LDX versus PRC-063. CONCLUSION: PRC-063 and LDX significantly improved ADHD symptomatology and functioning and were well-tolerated.

Efficacy and Safety of Dextroamphetamine Transdermal System for the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents: Results from a Pivotal Phase 2 Study.

Objectives: To assess efficacy and safety of the new Dextroamphetamine Transdermal System (d-ATS) to treat children and adolescents (aged 6-17 years) with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methods: In this phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled study, 4 d-ATS patches of differing doses (5, 10, 15, and 20 mg) were evaluated. Patients began a 5-week, open-label, stepwise dose-optimization period in which they received a 5-mg d-ATS patch (applied to hip) for 9 hours. During weekly visits, patients were evaluated for possible adjustments to the next dose level based on efficacy and safety. Once at the optimal dose, that dose was maintained during a 2-week, crossover double-blind treatment period. Primary endpoint was to assess efficacy of d-ATS versus placebo as measured by Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Scale (SKAMP) total score; key secondary endpoints included assessing onset and duration of efficacy by SKAMP total score, and additional secondary endpoints included Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) scores. Safety was assessed throughout. Results: d-ATS treatment resulted in significant improvements versus placebo in ADHD symptoms as measured by SKAMP total score, with overall least-squares mean difference (95% confidence interval) versus placebo of -5.87 (6.76, -4.97; p < 0.001) over the 12-hour assessment period. Onset of efficacy was observed at 2 hours postdose (p < 0.001), and duration of effect continued through 12 hours (patch removed at 9 hours), with significant differences between d-ATS and placebo at all time points from 2 hours onward (all p ≤ 0.003). Significant improvements versus placebo in PERMP-A and PERMP-C scores were also observed from 2 to 12 hours postdose with d-ATS treatment. d-ATS was safe and well-tolerated, with a systemic safety profile similar to that observed with oral amphetamines. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that d-ATS is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for children and adolescents with ADHD. These data indicate that d-ATS can deliver sustained levels of efficacy along with the advantages of transdermal drug delivery, making it a beneficial new treatment option. Clinical Trial Registration no.: NCT01711021.

Investigating sex differences and the effect of drug exposure order in the sensory reward-enhancing effects of nicotine and d-amphetamine alone and in combination.

Nicotine enhances the rewarding effects of other environmental stimuli; this reward-enhancement encourages and maintains nicotine consumption. Nicotine use precedes other psychostimulant use, but receiving a stimulant prescription also predicts future smoking. Previously, no study has investigated effects of drug exposure order in reward-enhancement, nor with nicotine and d-amphetamine. Thus, we aimed to investigate how drug exposure order impacted the reward-enhancing effects of nicotine and d-amphetamine, alone and in combination. We used 20 male and 20 female Sprague-Dawley rats. Enhancement was investigated within-subjects by examining responding maintained by a visual stimulus reinforcer following a pre-session injection of either d-amphetamine (Sal, 0.1, 0.3, or 0.6 mg/kg) or nicotine (Sal, 0.03, 0.06, 0.1, 0.3 mg/kg). Twenty rats (10 M, 10 F) completed enhancement testing with nicotine before d-amphetamine. The other 20 rats (10 M, 10 F) completed testing with d-amphetamine before nicotine. Following these phases, rats were then given two pre-session injections: one of d-amphetamine (Sal, 0.1, 0.3, or 0.6 mg/kg) and another of nicotine (Sal, 0.03, 0.06, 0.1, or 0.3 mg/kg). Experiencing amphetamine before nicotine increased reward-enhancing effects of nicotine. Females exhibited greater effects of d-amphetamine on reward-enhancement, with no effect of exposure order. During the interaction phase, receiving nicotine before amphetamine enhanced the interaction between nicotine and d-amphetamine for females whereas amphetamine before nicotine heightened this interaction for males. From this, prior and current amphetamine use, in addition to sex, should be considered when treating nicotine dependency and when examining factors driving poly-substance use involving nicotine and d-amphetamine. Keywords: Adderall, ADHD, Dexedrine, operant, smoking, polysubstance use.

Bilateral Acute Angle Closure in a Pediatric Patient Taking Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (Vyvanse).

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is commonly treated with amphetamines as first line therapy. Rare case reports have shown amphetamines are associated with open angle glaucoma. We report a rare case of a 14-year-old male who presented with bilateral acute angle closure presumed to be related to his use of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (Vyvanse). The patient's medication was discontinued which resulted in complete resolution of angle closure.

Amphetamine-Dextroamphetamine and Pregnancy: Neonatal Outcomes After Prenatal Prescription Mixed Amphetamine Exposure.

Objective: A retrospective cohort study was performed to evaluate whether birthweight was less among infants of women taking amphetamine-dextroamphetamine during pregnancy at our academic institution. Method: We identified mother-infant pairs with documented exposure to amphetamine-dextroamphetamine in pregnancy from 2005 through 2015. Patients were matched 2:1 with unexposed controls. Charts were reviewed for known causes of intrauterine growth restriction. Analysis of birthweight used generalized estimating equation blocking on matching. Medical histories were analyzed with χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. Results: We identified 53 exposed mother-infant pairs. The difference in mean birthweight of infants exposed to amphetamine-dextroamphetamine versus those not exposed was 26.9 g, which is not significant (95% confidence interval [CI] = [-141, 195 g]; p = .75). A significant difference was noted for exposed versus unexposed mothers for comorbid psychiatric illness and history of substance abuse (p < .001). Conclusion: With a limited sample size, our study suggests no significant difference in birthweight.

Pharmacologic treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects approximately 3% of adults globally. Many pharmacologic treatments options exist, yet the comparative benefits and harms of individual treatments are largely unknown. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to assess the relative effects of individual pharmacologic treatments for adults with ADHD. METHODS: We searched English-language published and grey literature sources for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving pharmacologic treatment of ADHD in adults (December 2018). The primary outcome was clinical response; secondary outcomes were quality of life, executive function, driving behaviour, withdrawals due to adverse events, treatment discontinuation, serious adverse events, hospitalization, cardiovascular adverse events, and emergency department visits. Data were pooled via pair-wise meta-analyses and Bayesian network meta-analyses. Risk of bias was assessed by use of Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool, and the certainty of the evidence was assessed by use of the GRADE framework. RESULTS: Eighty-one unique trials that reported at least one outcome of interest were included, most of which were at high or unclear risk of at least one important source of bias. Notably, only 5 RCTs were deemed at overall low risk of bias. Included pharmacotherapies were methylphenidate, atomoxetine, dexamfetamine, lisdexamfetamine, guanfacine, bupropion, mixed amphetamine salts, and modafinil. As a class, ADHD pharmacotherapy improved patient- and clinician-reported clinical response compared with placebo (range: 4 to 15 RCTs per outcome); however, these findings were not conserved when the analyses were restricted to studies at low risk of bias, and the certainty of the finding is very low. There were few differences among individual medications, although atomoxetine was associated with improved patient-reported clinical response and quality of life compared with placebo. There was no significant difference in the risk of serious adverse events or treatment discontinuation between ADHD pharmacotherapies and placebo; however, the proportion of participants who withdrew due to adverse events was significantly higher among participants who received any ADHD pharmacotherapy. Few RCTs reported on the occurrence of adverse events over a long treatment duration. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, despite a class effect of improving clinical response relative to placebo, there were few differences among the individual ADHD pharmacotherapies, and most studies were at risk of at least one important source of bias. Furthermore, the certainty of the evidence was very low to low for all outcomes, and there was limited reporting of long-term adverse events. As such, the choice between ADHD pharmacotherapies may depend on individual patient considerations, and future studies should assess the long-term effects of individual pharmacotherapies on patient-important outcomes, including quality of life, in robust blinded RCTs. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO no. CRD 42015026049.

[Risk of psychosis with treatment for ADHD]. / Kans op psychose bij behandeling van ADHD.

The study by Moran et al. on the risk of psychosis among adolescents in the US who are treated with a stimulant for ADHD is important. This is because ADHD is a common disorder (3-5%), because psychosis often emerges in adolescence, because ADHD and psychosis share increased comorbidity and because ADHD is treated with stimulant medication that may increase the risk of psychosis. This means there is a multifactorial relationship between ADHD and psychosis.The outcome of the study is that stimulants increase the risk of psychosis to a limited extent, i.e. 0.10% for methylphenidate and 0.21% for dexamphetamine. It is recommended to opt for methylphenidate in adolescents with ADHD. This is confirmed by a Swedish registry study that controlled for a history of psychosis and showed that methylphenidate did not increase the incidence of psychosis after one year, regardless of a history of psychosis.

Dose Adjustment of Stimulants for Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Retrospective Chart Review of the Impact of Exceeding Recommended Doses.

BACKGROUND: When children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are treated with stimulant medication, the dose is established clinically by dose adjustment over time. Little is known about children who are not adequately treated when they reach a designated maximum dose, or the consequences of exceeding this dose. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the characteristics of and side effects observed in children optimised to high dose (HD) versus regular dose (RD) stimulants. METHOD: Children treated by one paediatrician (AP) in Western Sydney, Australia with HD stimulants (n = 52) were identified using an electronic database; controls on RD stimulant (n = 118) were matched by prescription date with the cases' first HD prescription. HD was defined as methylphenidate > 2 mg/kg/day or > 108 mg/day; dexamphetamine > 1 mg/kg/day or > 50 mg/day; lisdexamfetamine > 70 mg/day. In all children, the dose was adjusted over time to optimise the clinical response. Clinical characteristics, anthropometric measures, reported side effects and reasons for dose changes were extracted from the clinical charts by LR, VS and CS. The HD and RD cohorts were compared using chi-square for categorical data and t tests for continuous data. RESULTS: The HD cohort included more boys (88% vs 75%, p = 0.041) and more oppositional defiant disorder (83% vs 55%, p = 0.001). They started stimulants younger (6.40 ± 1.67 vs 8.28 ± 2.77 years, p < 0.001) and had more growth attenuation (Δ height z-score - 0.41 ± 0.55 vs - 0.09 ± 0.58, p = 0.001; Δ weight z-score - 0.56 ± 0.82 vs - 0.18 ± 0.66, p = 0.002). The growth attenuation mainly occurred before the dose reached the HD range. Diminishing stimulant effectiveness was the commonest reason for a dose increase in either cohort, the most prominent recurring symptoms being persistent anger/aggression in the HD and poor concentration in the RD cohort. The commonest reason for dose reduction in the HD cohort was that a dose increase gave no added benefit; dose reduction or change of drug due to subdued/depressed behaviour was more frequent in RD children. Apart from growth attenuation, no serious complications were reported in the HD group. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study, dose adjustment over time in some patients meant using higher doses than those generally recommended. These children experienced more growth attenuation but recorded no other significant treatment complications. Determining the dose purely on clinical grounds by careful dose adjustment over time appears reasonable, but more data on this issue is required to clarify the efficacy and tolerability of exceeding the recommended doses of stimulants when treating ADHD.

The relationship between childhood trauma, dopamine release and dexamphetamine-induced positive psychotic symptoms: a [11C]-(+)-PHNO PET study.

Childhood trauma is a risk factor for psychosis. Amphetamine increases synaptic striatal dopamine levels and can induce positive psychotic symptoms in healthy individuals and patients with schizophrenia. Socio-developmental hypotheses of psychosis propose that childhood trauma and other environmental risk factors sensitize the dopamine system to increase the risk of psychotic symptoms, but this remains to be tested in humans. We used [11C]-(+)-PHNO positron emission tomography to measure striatal dopamine-2/3 receptor (D2/3R) availability and ventral striatal dexamphetamine-induced dopamine release in healthy participants (n = 24). The relationships between dexamphetamine-induced dopamine release, dexamphetamine-induced positive psychotic symptoms using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and childhood trauma using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) were assessed using linear regression and mediation analyses, with childhood trauma as the independent variable, dexamphetamine-induced dopamine release as the mediator variable, and dexamphetamine-induced symptoms as the dependent variable. There was a significant interaction between childhood trauma and ventral striatal dopamine release in predicting dexamphetamine-induced positive psychotic symptoms (standardized ß = 1.83, p = 0.003), but a mediation analysis was not significant (standardized ß = -0.18, p = 0.158). There were no significant effects of dopamine release and childhood trauma on change in negative (p = 0.280) or general PANSS symptoms (p = 0.061), and there was no relationship between ventral striatal baseline D2/3R availability and positive symptoms (p = 0.368). This indicates childhood trauma and dopamine release interact to influence the induction of positive psychotic symptoms. This is not consistent with a simple sensitization hypothesis, but suggests that childhood trauma moderates the cognitive response to dopamine release to make psychotic experiences more likely.

Effects of d-amphetamine and MK-801 on impulsive choice: Modulation by schedule of reinforcement and delay length.

Procedural modifications can modulate drug effects in delay discounting, such as signaling the delay to reinforcement and altering the order in which delays are presented. Although the schedule of reinforcement can alter the rate at which animals discount a reinforcer, research has not determined if animals trained on different schedules of reinforcement are differentially affected by pharmacological manipulations. Similarly, research has not determined if using different delays to reinforcement can modulate drug effects in delay discounting. Male Sprague Dawley rats (n = 36) were split into four groups and were trained in a delay-discounting procedure. The schedule of reinforcement (fixed ratio [FR] 1 vs. FR 10) and delays to reinforcement (0, 5, 10, 20, and 50 s vs. 0, 10, 30, 60, 100 s) were manipulated for each group. Following behavioral training, rats were treated with d-amphetamine (0, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg) and MK-801 (0, 0.03, and 0.06 mg/kg). Results showed that amphetamine decreased impulsive choice when a FR 1 schedule was used, but only when the short delay sequence was used. Conversely, amphetamine decreased impulsive choice when a FR 10 schedule was used, but only when rats were trained on the long delay sequence. MK-801 decreased impulsive choice in rats trained on a FR 1 schedule, regardless of delay sequence, but did not alter choice in rats trained on a FR 10 schedule. These results show that schedule of reinforcement and delay length can modulate drug effects in delay discounting.

Subjective responses to amphetamine in young adults with previous mood elevation experiences.

RATIONALE: One risk factor for alcohol and substance misuse is hypomanic experiences, or periods of mood elevation. Young people who report hypomanic states are more likely to develop bipolar disorder (BP), and BP and other mood disorders increase the risk of addiction. We recently reported that young adults with a history of mood elevation experience less subjective effects from a low dose of alcohol, which may be predictive of future alcohol use. The finding with alcohol raised the question of whether this dampened response to a drug also applies to other drugs, such as amphetamine. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed responses of d-amphetamine in healthy young adults with varying experiences of mood elevation, as measured by the Mood Disorders Questionnaire (MDQ). METHODS: Healthy 18-19-year-olds (N = 30) with a range of MDQ scores participated in three 4-h laboratory sessions in which they received placebo, 10 mg, or 20 mg d-amphetamine. They completed mood questionnaires and cardiovascular measures. RESULTS: Individuals with higher MDQ scores reported less stimulation and euphoria after 10 mg, but not 20 mg, d-amphetamine, than individuals with lower scores. MDQ scores were not related to cardiovascular responses to the drug. CONCLUSIONS: A history of mood elevation experiences or hypomania states is related to dampened response to a low dose of a psychostimulant drug, extending previous findings with dampened response to alcohol. This phenotype for mood disorders of dampened responses to drugs may contribute to risk for subsequent drug use or misuse.

Development of a Semimechanistic Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Model Describing Dextroamphetamine Exposure and Striatal Dopamine Response in Rats and Nonhuman Primates following a Single Dose of Dextroamphetamine.

Acute central nervous system exposure to dextroamphetamine (d-amphetamine) elicits a multitude of effects, including dual action on the dopamine transporter (DAT) to increase extracellular dopamine, and induction of a negative feedback response to limit the dopamine increase. A semimechanistic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model with consideration of these multiple effects as a basis was developed. Integrated pharmacokinetics of d-amphetamine in plasma, brain extracellular fluid (ECF) via microdialysis, and cerebrospinal fluid were characterized using a population approach. This PK model was then linked to an indirect-response pharmacodynamic model using as a basis the measurement of extracellular striatal dopamine, also via microdialysis. In both rats and nonhuman primates (NHPs), d-amphetamine stimulation of dopamine outflow (reverse transport) through DAT was primarily responsible for the dose-linear increase in dopamine. As well, in both species a moderator function was needed to account for loss of the dopamine response in the presence of a relatively sustained d-amphetamine ECF exposure, presumptive of an acute tolerance response. PK/PD model structure was consistent between species; however, there was a 10-fold faster return to baseline dopamine in NHPs in response to an acute d-amphetamine challenge. These results suggest preservation from rodents to NHPs regarding the mechanism by which amphetamine increases extracellular dopamine, but a faster system response in NHPs to tolerate this increase. This microdialysis-based PK/PD model suggests greater value in directing preclinical discovery of novel approaches that modify reverse transport stimulation to treat amphetamine abuse. General value regarding insertion of an NHP model in paradigm rodent-to-human translational research is also suggested.

Pharmacokinetics of Sustained-Release Oral Dexamphetamine Sulfate in Cocaine and Heroin-Dependent Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Research has shown that sustained-release (SR) dexamphetamine is a promising agonist treatment for cocaine dependence. However, little is known about the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of SR oral dexamphetamine. This study examined the PKs of a new SR dexamphetamine formulation in cocaine plus heroin-dependent patients currently in heroin-assisted treatment. METHODS: The study was designed as an open-label PK study in 2 cohorts: n = 5 with once daily 60 mg and n = 7 with once daily 30 mg SR oral dexamphetamine. Five days of blood plasma dexamphetamine concentrations measured with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry with PK parameter estimates using noncompartmental analysis. RESULTS: Twelve cocaine-dependent plus heroin-dependent patients in heroin-assisted treatment were included. The initial cohort 1 dose of 60 mg once daily was adjusted to 30 mg after mild to moderate adverse events. After oral administration, tmax values (coefficient of variation %) were 6.0 (17.0%) and 6.3 (16.3%) hours and t1/2 were 11 (24.6%) and 12 (25.4%) hours for 60 mg and 30 mg SR dexamphetamine, respectively. At steady state, CSSmax values were reached at 100 (27.5%) ng/mL and 58.4 (14.4%) ng/mL, whereas CSSmin values were 39.5 (38.9%) ng/mL and 21.8 (19.8%) ng/mL for 60 mg and 30 mg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The investigated SR formulation of dexamphetamine showed favorable slow-release characteristics in cocaine and heroin-dependent patients. A dose-proportional steady-state concentration was achieved within 3 days. These findings support the suitability of the SR formulation in the treatment of cocaine dependence.