Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for high-grade migrated lumbar disc herniation: clinical efficacy and safety assessment.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) in the management of high-grade migrated Lumbar disc herniation (LDH). METHODS: A total of 328 patients who underwent PEID for high-grade migrated LDH between May 2020 and January 2023 in our hospital were selected. Patients were categorized into high-grade migrated group and low-grade migrated group according to preoperative MRI findings. The preoperative and postoperative evaluations of clinical outcomes, such as Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for lower backs and legs, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and modified MacNab criteria for surgical success, were compared between groups. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found in hospitalization time, surgery time, intraoperative hemorrhage, number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, or incision length between the two groups. The lower back and leg VAS scores and ODI exhibited a statistically significant decrease in both groups across all postoperative time intervals. However, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. Postoperative nerve root stimulation symptoms were reported in two and three cases in the high-grade migrated group and low-grade migrated group, respectively. One patient in the high-grade migrated group underwent reoperation due to re-herniation at the same segment. There was no significant difference in the rate of excellent-good cases between the two groups, with an overall rate of 94.7%. CONCLUSION: In treating high-grade migrated disc herniation, PEID offers advantages such as reduced trauma, small incision, quicker recovery and satisfactory clinical safety and efficacy.

[Effect and complication among different kinds of spinal endoscopic surgery for lumbar disc herniation].

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical efficacy and complication rate of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy(PETD),percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) and unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) in treating single-segment lumbar disc herniation(LDH). METHODS: From October 2019 to August 2021,121 LDH patients with single-segment treated by spinal endoscopy were retrospectively analyzed and divided into three groups. In PETD group,there were 48 patients,including 19 males and 29 females,aged from 18 to 72 years old with an average of (44.0±13.9) years old;3 patients with L3,4 segments,27 patients with L4,5 segments,and 18 patients with L5S1 segments. In PEID group,there were 43 patients,including 23 males and 20 females,aged from 20 to 69 years old with an average of (40.1±12.1) years old;1 patient with L3,4 segments,15 patients with L4,5 segments,and 27 patients with L5S1 segments. In UBE group,there were 30 patients,including 12 males and 18 females,aged from 29 to 72 years old with an average of (41.2±15.0) years old;1 patient with L3,4 segments,18 patients with L4,5 segments,and 11 patients with L5S1 segments. Operation time,blood loss,fluoroscopy times and complications among three groups were observed and compared. Before opertaion,3 months after operation and at the latest follow-up,visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate low back pain and lower extremity pain,Oswestry disfunction index (ODI) was used to evaluate lumbar function,and modified MacNab was used to evaluate clinical efficacy at the latest follow-up. RESULTS: All patients were performed endoscopic spinal surgery completly and were followed up for at least 12 months. One patient occurred dural sac rupture both in PETD and PEID group,and dural sac rupture was small,and there was no obvious discomfort after operation. Two patients were occurred intraoperative rupture of dural sac in UBE group. One patient was occurred cerebrospinal fluid leakage after operation,and was improved after rest in supine position and fluid rehydration. One patient without no significant postoperative discomfort. (1)There were no significant difference in operating time,blood loss and hospital stay between PETD and PEID group (P>0.05),while UBE group was higher than those of PETD and PEID group (P<0.05). There was no statistical significance in fluoroscopy times between PEID and UBE group (P>0.05),but PETD group was higher than that of PEID and UBE group (P<0.05). (2)VAS of low back pain at 3 months after operation in UBE group was higher than that in PETD and PEID group (P<0.05),but there was no significant difference between PETD and PEID group (P>0.05). At the latest follow-up,there was no significant difference in VAS of low back pain among three groups (P>0.05). (3)Lower extremity pain of VAS and ODI among 3 groups after operation were significantly improved at all time points compared with those before opertaion(P<0.05),and there were no statistical significance between groups (P>0.05),and there were no statistical significance in interaction between different time points and operation groups (P>0.05). (4) At the latest follow-up,according to the modified MacNab standard,the results of PETD group were excellent in 27 patients,good in 16 patients,moderate in 4 patients,poor in 1 patient;in PEID group,27 patients got excellent result,12 good,3 moderate,and 1 poor;in UBE group,16 patients got excellent,10 good,2 moderate,and 2 poor. There was no significant difference among three groups (χ2=0.308,P>0.05). Recurrence of lumbar disc herniation occurred in 1 patient among each three groups,symptoms were improved in 2 patients after symptomatic treatment,and 1 patient was treated in other hospitals. CONCLUSION: PETD,PEID and UBE techniques could achieve good early clinical effects in treating lumbar disc herniation with similar complication rates. Both of PETD and PEID are single-channel minimally invasive surgery,with mild intraoperative tissue damage and quick postoperative recovery; while intraoperative fluoroscopy of PETD was relatively more frequent, and PEID was more suitable for L5S1 segment;UBE is a two-channel surgery,in which the intraoperative soft tissue damage is more severe,but exposure is broad,which is more suitable for complex cases.

Clinical efficacy of nucleoplasty for uncontained lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: There are insufficient in-depth studies on whether percutaneous lumbar nucleoplasty (PLN) is effective and safe for the treatment of uncontained lumbar disc herniation (ULDH). This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of PLN on radiating leg pain caused by ULDH. METHODS: Patients who underwent PLN for ULDH and met the inclusion criteria between June 2018 and July 2022 were included. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the numeric rating scale (NRS) for radiating pain preoperatively; at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively; and at the last follow-up. Patient satisfaction was assessed using MacNab criteria. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were enrolled. The mean age was 50.2 years (range 24-73 years). The mean and standard deviation of the preoperative NRS in 39 patients with radiating pain was 9.0 ± 1.2. The NRS scores at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively and at the last follow-up were 4.6 ± 3.2, 3.6 ± 3.3, 2.9 ± 3.2, and 1.4 ± 2.0, respectively, showing significant improvement (all, p < 0.001). The number of patients (percentage) with excellent or good satisfaction according to the MacNab criteria was 29 (70.7%). Major complications were not observed. Three patients underwent additional surgery after PLN because of persistent radiating pain. CONCLUSIONS: PLN is a safe and feasible treatment option for ULDH. Treatment outcomes were favorable on average; however, the lack of consistency was a drawback.

Risk factors for surgical site infection after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy.

The objective of this study was to investigate the risk factors associated with surgical site infection (SSI) after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). A retrospective analysis was performed on a cohort of 335 patients who underwent PELD between January 2016 and January 2023. Data were derived from the Hospital Information System (HIS), and a comprehensive statistical assessment was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 25.0. Both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses assessed a range of risk determinants, such as age, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, laboratory test parameters and surgery-related variables. The incidence of SSI after PELD was 2.7% (9/335). Univariate analysis highlighted BMI, diabetes mellitus, long-term corticosteroid consumption, surgical time and cerebrospinal fluid leakage as significant predictors of SSI. Multivariate logistic regression identified BMI, diabetes mellitus, long-term corticosteroid consumption, surgical time and cerebrospinal fluid leakage as significant risk factors for SSI after PELD. High BMI, diabetes mellitus, long-term corticosteroid consumption, long surgical time and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage are predisposing factors for SSI in patients undergoing PELD. Precise interventions focused on such risk components, including careful preoperative assessment and strategic postoperative care, are essential to reduce the incidence of SSI and improve surgical efficacy.

Comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy between transforaminal and interlaminar approach: a minimum two year follow-up.

PURPOSE: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy has been increasingly used in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. However, there is no consensus on which method would be more effective between the transforaminal and interlaminar approach. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction rate, reoperation rate, and residual symptoms between percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID). STUDY DESIGN: A comparative, retrospective, controlled trial. SETTING: The study was conducted at the Department of Orthopaedics at a local hospital. METHODS: From January 2015 to September 2020, consecutive patients who underwent PETD or PEID treatment for lumbar disk herniation (LDH) at the L5/S1 level in our department were retrospectively collected. Baseline data including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, alcohol drinking, clinical symptoms, physical examination, and radiographic characteristics were documented. During the two to three year follow-up periods, patients were evaluated clinically, including clinical outcomes assessed by the visual analog score (VAS), patient satisfaction rates assessed by the North American Spine Society patient satisfaction index (PSI), recurrent rate, and residual symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients with PELD in our department were included in the current study, with 65 patients in the PETD group and 48 in the PEID group. Demographic characteristics including age, gender, height, BMI, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption status, and diabetes did not show any significant difference between the PETD and PEID groups. The VAS scores of the two groups were similar preoperatively, but the postoperative VAS score of the PEID group was lower than that of the PETD group. There were 90.8% of patients in the PETD group who were satisfied with the operation compared to 97.9% in the PEID group. The recurrence rate did not differ between groups, with three patients in both groups. Regarding residual symptoms, there were more patients in the PETD group who reported low back pain during the follow-up periods. LIMITATION: The main limitations are that all patients were operated by the same surgical team from the same site, and there was a lack of multicenter data. CONCLUSION: Both PETD and PEID have satisfactory patient-reported outcomes for treating LDH. The PEID procedure results in fewer low back pain residual symptoms than the PELD procedure.

Awake transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy in an ambulatory surgery center: early clinical outcomes and complications of 100 patients.

PURPOSE: Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy has been found to have equivalent outcomes to traditional discectomy techniques. Controversy exists concerning whether this should be performed under general anesthetic with neuromonitoring or can be safely performed on awake patients without neuromonitoring. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of awake transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in an ambulatory setting. METHODS: 100 consecutive patients with lumbar disc herniations treated with transforaminal endoscopic discectomy by a single surgeon were enrolled in the study. All procedures were performed under conscious sedation with local anesthetic. Preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded and compared. Time spent in recovery prior to discharge home and complications were also recorded. RESULTS: Average VAS score improved from a mean of 6.85 to 0.74 (median 7 to 0) immediately postoperatively. The average time spent in Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) prior to discharge was 56.7 min. Average VAS score at 2 weeks was 3.07 (median 2.5). Complication rates were commensurate with published results in the literature. The most common complication was radiculitis, which appears to be more likely with foraminal/extraforaminal herniations at a rate of 20.7%, versus 2.6% for central/paracentral herniations. There were no cases that required conversion to general anesthetic or transfer to a hospital and no permanent nerve injuries in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic discectomy can safely and successfully be performed in an ambulatory surgery center under conscious sedation and local anesthetic without neuromonitoring. This procedure leads to rapid recovery in the PACU and significantly improved VAS scores postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Full-endoscopic discectomy for thoracic disc herniations: a single-arm meta-analysis of safety and efficacy outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical intervention is the treatment of choice in patients with thoracic disc herniation with refractory symptoms and progressive myelopathy. Due to high occurrence of complications from open surgery, minimally invasive approaches are desirable. Nowadays, endoscopic techniques have become increasingly popular and full-endoscopic surgery can be performed in the thoracic spine with low complication rates. METHODS: Cochrane Central, PubMed, and Embase databases were systematically searched for studies that evaluated patients who underwent full-endoscopic spine thoracic surgery. The outcomes of interest were dural tear, myelopathy, epidural hematoma, recurrent disc herniation, and dysesthesia. In the absence of comparative studies, a single-arm meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: We included 13 studies with a total of 285 patients. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 89 months, age from 17 to 82 years, with 56.5% male. The procedure was performed under local anesthesia with sedation in 222 patients (77.9%). A transforaminal approach was used in 88.1% of the cases. There were no cases of infection or death reported. The data showed a pooled incidence of outcomes as follows, with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI)-dural tear (1.3%; 95% CI 0-2.6%); dysesthesia (4.7%; 95% CI 2.0-7.3%); recurrent disc herniation (2.9%; 95% CI 0.6-5.2%); myelopathy (2.1%; 95% CI 0.4-3.8%); epidural hematoma (1.1%; 95% CI 0.2-2.5%); and reoperation (1.7%; 95% CI 0.1-3.4%). CONCLUSION: Full-endoscopic discectomy has a low incidence of adverse outcomes in patients with thoracic disc herniations. Controlled studies, ideally randomized, are warranted to establish the comparative efficacy and safety of the endoscopic approach relative to open surgery.

Effectiveness and safety of intrathecal morphine for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy under low-dose ropivacaine: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is a surgical setting that requires minimal motor impairment. Low-dose spinal ropivacaine induces little motor blockade and could be ideal for maintaining safety of PELD, but its analgesic efficacy is questionable. An adjunct analgesic approach is needed to maximize the benefits of low-dose spinal ropivacaine for PELD. PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore the effectiveness and safety of 100 µg intrathecal morphine (ITM) as an adjuvant analgesic method for PELD under low-dose spinal ropivacaine. STUDY DESIGN: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2000039842 (www.chictr.org.cn). SAMPLE: Ninety patients scheduled for elective single-level PELD under low-dose spinal ropivacaine. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the overall intraoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain. Secondary outcomes were intraoperative VAS scores assessed at multiple timepoints; intraoperative rescue analgesic requirement; postoperative VAS scores; disability scale; patients' satisfaction with anesthesia; adverse events; and radiographic outcomes. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive low-dose ropivacaine spinal anesthesia with (ITM group, n=45) or without (control group, n=45) 100 µg ITM. RESULTS: The overall intraoperative VAS score in the ITM group was significantly lower than that in the control group (0 [0, 1] vs 2 [1, 3], p<.001). During operation, the VAS scores at cannula insertion, 30 minutes after insertion, 60 minutes after insertion, and 120 minutes after insertion were all significantly lower in the ITM group (all p<.05). Less patients in the ITM group required rescue analgesia during operation compared with those in the control group (14% vs 42%, p= .003). The VAS score for back pain in the ITM group was lower than that in the control group at 1 hour, 12 hours, and 24 hours postoperatively. Besides, the satisfaction score in the ITM group was significantly higher than that in the control group (p=.017). For adverse events, 8/43 of ITM and 1/44 of control participants experienced pruritus (p=.014), with a relative risk (95% confidence interval) of 8.37 (1.09-64.16). The incidence of other adverse events was similar between the two groups. Of note, respiratory depression occurred in one ITM-treated patient. CONCLUSION: The addition of 100 µg ITM to low-dose ropivacaine appears to be effective in analgesia without compromised motor function for PELD; however, ITM increased the risk of pruritus and clinicians should be vigilant about its potential risk of respiratory depression.

Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model for the Risk of Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation After Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy.

BACKGROUND: Recurrence of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is an adverse event after percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD). Accurate prediction of the risk of recurrent LDH (rLDH) after surgery remains a major challenge for spine surgeons. OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a prognostic model based on risk factors for rLDH after PETD. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Inpatient surgery center. METHODS: Clinical data were retrospectively collected from 645 patients with LDH who underwent PETD at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from January 1, 2017 to January 1, 2021. Predictors significantly associated with rLBH were screened according to least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, and a prognostic model was established, followed by internal model validation using the enhanced bootstrap method. The performance of the model was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration curves. Finally, the clinical usefulness of the model was analyzed using decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curves (CICs). RESULTS: Among the 645 patients included in this study, 56 experienced recurrence of LDH after PETD (8.7%). Seven factors significantly associated with rLDH were selected by LASSO regression, including age, type of herniation, level of herniation, Modic changes, Pfirrmann classification, smoking, and history of high-intensity physical work. The bias-corrected curve of the model fit well with the apparent curve, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.822 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.88). The DCA and CIC confirmed that the prognostic model had good clinical utility. LIMITATIONS: This is a single-center study, and we used internal validation only. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic model developed in this study had excellent comprehensive performance and could well predict the risk of rLDH after PETD. This model could be used to identify patients at high risk for rLDH at an early stage to individualize the patient's treatment modality and postoperative rehabilitation plan.

Temporary 6TH cranial nerve paralysis after accidental durotomy in endoscopic disc surgery.

We present a unique case of 6th nerve palsy following accidental durotomy in endoscopic lumbar spine surgery, which has not been reported in the literature before. A 72- year-old female patient was admitted to our outpatient clinic complaining of right leg pain for 6 months. A 4/5 motor paresis was observed on her right toe with a positive Lasegue test at 45°. On her magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a L5-S1 disc herniation was detected. The patient was planned for percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar disc surgery. The extruded disc was adherent to the dura. During removal, a dural tear was observed. She was relieved of her right leg pain immediately after surgery, but after 30 min postoperatively, she complained of double vision with left abducens nerve paralysis. On cranial MRI, no abnormality could be observed. Intravenous fluids were administered and the paralysis resolved on the postoperative 24th hour. The patient was discharged from the hospital and did not show any complaints on her follow-ups. A 6th nerve palsy can be caused due to alterations of intracranial pressure or mechanic injury. We believe that the durotomy following removing of the disc fragment caused a rapid drainage of CSF, leading to intracranial hypotension and injury of the abducens nerve. Intracranial pressure should be monitored perioperatively and brisk deteriorations has to result in immediate finishing of the surgery to avoid further secondary damage.

Depression is associated with worse outcome after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a 5-year follow-up study.

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between depression and outcome of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) in patients with lumbar disc herniation. We examined 268 patients who underwent PELD for lumbar disc herniation and were followed for five years. Patients were grouped according to mood: normal mood (159 patients) and continuous depression (109 patients). Depressive symptoms were assessed using the 21-item Beck Depression Inventory. Back and leg pain were assessed using the visual analogue scale. Subjective disability was measured using the Oswestry Disability Index. Neurological function and physical disability were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score. Disc-height ratio and intervertebral instability were measured to assess lumbar stability. Clinical and radiological data were recorded before surgery and at the 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year follow-ups. Although the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, visual analogue scale, and Oswestry Disability Index scores did not significantly differ between groups before surgery, all three scores significantly differed between groups at all follow-up time points after PELD (p < 0.05). Measurements of disc-height ratio and intervertebral instability did not significantly differ between the groups before surgery nor at any point after surgery (P > 0.05). Patients with continuous depression exhibited less improvement in symptom severity and disability score after PELD at all time points in the five years after surgery. Depression had little effect on lumbar vertebral stability after PELD. Interventions to detect and treat depression should be performed before and after surgery.

A clinical nomogram for predicting the residual low back pain after percutaneous endoscopic surgery for lumbar disc herniation.

PURPOSE: Current findings suggest that minimally percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is a practical therapeutic approach for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). However, some patients still end up with residual low back pain, even after surgery. Our study aims to construct and validate a nomogram to predict residual low back pain after PELD. METHODS: The medical records of 355 LDH patients admitted to the author's hospital were retrospectively analyzed between January 2019 and December 2021. The patients were randomly divided into two groups with a ratio of 7:3, namely a modelling group and a validation group. The univariable logistics and multivariable regression methods were used to screen the independent risk factors. A nomogram was then drawn using independent risk factors selected from the univariable and multivariable regression analyses. The concordance index (C-index), the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the calibration curve, and the decision curve analysis were used to evaluate the nomogram's performance. Finally, the accuracy of the nomogram was verified by a validation cohort. RESULTS: 36.6% (130/355) of patients showed low back pain after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy, while 63.4% (225/355) showed no symptoms. Multivariable logistical regression analysis showed that Modic change (p < 0.05, OR = 1.813), fatty infiltration of the paravertebral muscle (p < 0.05, OR = 2.935), and edema of lumbodorsal fascia (p = 0.049, OR = 1.611) were significant risk factors for post-operative residual back pain. Moreover, the C-index of the predictive nomogram was 0.743 (0.681-0.805), the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value was 0.739, and the DCA results exhibit a net benefit between 0.16 and 0.66. The above internal validation methods demonstrate the nomogram's good predictive capability. CONCLUSION: Each variable in the model had a quantitatively corresponding risk score, which can be used in predicting residual low back pain after PELD.

Complications of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy versus Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic lumbar discectomy has been an alternative for treating lumbar disc herniation. Evidence-based study for the benefit zone of full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD) is necessary. The study compared the complication risks between the FELD and open discectomy or microdiscectomy. METHODS: The literature search was from 4 online databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. The meta-analysis of different study designs was conducted separately. Complication rates were considered primary outcomes, and the recurrence and revision rates were considered secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Six RCTs and thirteen cohort studies met the eligibility criteria. The meta-analysis was conducted separately. From the pooled RCT meta-analysis, the overall complication rates of FELD and open discectomy/microdiscectomy were 5.5% and 10.4%, respectively. The moderate-quality evidence suggested that FELD had a lower risk of overall complications (risk ratio [RR] = 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.31-0.98). There was no significant difference in specific complications and recurrence. The analysis of cohort studies revealed no significant difference in overall complications, but there was significant heterogeneity in the results. The risk of dural injury was significantly lower for FELD (RR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.22-0.96). The pooled meta-analysis from cohort studies suggested a higher risk of transient dysesthesia (RR = 3.70, 95% CI = 1.54-8.89), residual fragment (RR = 5.29, 95% CI = 2.67-10.45), and revision surgeries (RR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.12-2.08) for FELD. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence showed a lower risk of overall complications for FELD. The quality of evidence was moderate to low, and the risk of bias from the primary literature should be concerned.

Application of a new body surface-assisting puncture device in percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy.

BACKGROUND: Accurate puncture and localization are critical for percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy surgery. However, several punctures are often required, followed by X-ray fluoroscopy, which can increase surgical risk and complications. The aim of this study was to demonstrate a new body surface-assisting puncture device that can be used in percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy and to assess its clinical effectiveness. METHODS: Three hundred and forty-four patients were treated with percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy surgery in the Spinal Surgery Department of Taian City Central Hospital, China, between January 2020 and February 2022. Of these, 162 patients (the locator group) were punctured using a body surface-assisting puncture device while and 182 patients (the control group) were punctured using the traditional blind puncture method. The number of punctures, radiation dose during X-ray fluoroscopy, operation time, and surgical complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The average number of punctures was 2.15 ± 1.10 in the locator group which was significantly lower than that in the control group (5.30 ± 1.74; P < 0.001). The average X-ray fluoroscopy radiation dose in the locator group was significantly lower at 2.34 ± 0.99 mGy, compared with 5.13 ± 1.29 mGy in the control group (P < 0.001). The mean operation time was also significantly less in locator group (47.06 ± 5.12 vs. 62.47 ± 5.44 min; P = 0.008). No significant differences in surgical complications were found between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The use of a new body surface-assisting puncture device in percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy surgery can significantly reduce the number of punctures and X-ray fluoroscopy radiation dose, as well as shortening the operation time, without increasing surgical complications. This device is cheap, easy to operate, and suitable for all hospitals and spine surgeons, especially for small hospitals, with also no extra costs for patients.

Efficacy and safety of percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy for cervical disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Since there are currently no systematic evidence-based medical data on the efficacy and safety of PECD, this meta-analysis pooled data from studies that reported the efficacy or safety of PECD for cervical disc herniation to examine the efficacy, recurrence and safety of using PECD to treat cervical disc herniation. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases for studies published from inception to July 2022. Nine nonrandomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) that reported the efficacy or safety of percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy for cervical disc herniation were included. We excluded duplicate publications, studies without full text, studies with incomplete information, studies that did not enable us to conduct data extraction, animal experiments and reviews. STATA 15.1 software was used to analyse the data. RESULTS: The proportions of excellent and good treatment results after PECD for CDH were 39% (95% CI: 31-48%) and 47% (95% CI: 34-59%), respectively. The pooled results showed that the VAS scores at 1 week post-operatively (SMD = -2.55, 95% CI: - 3.25 to - 1.85) and at the last follow-up (SMD = - 4.30, 95% CI: - 5.61 to - 3.00) after PECD for cervical disc herniation were significantly lower than the pre-operative scores. The recurrence rate of neck pain and the incidence of adverse events after PECD for cervical disc herniation were 3% (95% CI: 1-6%) and 5% (95% CI: 2-9%), respectively. Additionally, pooled results show that the operative time (SMD = - 3.22, 95% CI: - 5.21 to - 1.43) and hospital stay (SMD = - 1.75, 95% CI: - 2.67to - 0.84) were all significantly lower for PECD than for ACDF. The pooled results also showed that the proportion of excellent treatment results was significantly higher for PECD than for ACDF (OR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.06-4.96). CONCLUSION: PECD has a high success rate in the treatment of CHD and can relieve neck pain, and the recurrence rate and the incidence of adverse events are low. In addition, compared with ACDF, PECD has a higher rate of excellent outcomes and a lower operative time and hospital stay. PECD may be a better option for treating CHD.

Revision surgery for symptomatic postoperative pseudocyst following full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy: clinical characteristics and surgical strategies.

BACKGROUND: A symptomatic postoperative pseudocyst (PP) is a cystic lesion that is formed in the operation area of the intervertebral disc, leading to worse symptoms. Some minority patients who developed PP experienced rapidly aggravating symptoms and could not be treated by any kind of conservative treatment. However, no clinical studies have evaluated the clinical characteristics and surgical strategies of symptomatic PP requiring a revision surgery after full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD). This study aimed to demonstrate the clinical characteristics and surgical strategies of symptomatic PP requiring a revision surgery after FELD. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who received FELD revision surgeries due to symptomatic PP formation between January 2016 and December 2021. Common characteristics, time intervals of symptom recurrence and revision surgery, strategies for conservative treatment and revision surgery, operative time, imaging characteristics, numeric rating scale (NRS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI) and overall outcome rating based on modified MacNab criteria were analyzed. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (males = 10, females = 4), with a mean age of 24.4 years, were enrolled. The mean time intervals of symptom recurrence and revision surgery were 43.5 and 18.9 days respectively. While the patients were conservatively managed with analgesics and physical therapy, pain persisted or progressively worsened. In comparison to the initial herniated disc, the PP was larger in 11 cases, and up- or down-migrated in four cases. The PP location included the lateral recess (n = 12), foraminal (n = 1), and centrolateral (n = 1) zones. One of the two cases treated by percutaneous aspiration (PA) was eventually treated by FELD as pain was not relieved. Follow-ups revealed an improved mean NRS score from 7.1 to 1.4, mean ODI from 68.6 to 7.9% and promising overall surgical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The progressively severe pain experienced due to PP might be a result of its enlargement or migration to the lateral recess and foraminal zones. As complete removal of capsule is the goal, we recommend FELD instead of PA.

How I do it: biportal endoscopic paraspinal approach for recurrent lumbar disc herniation following percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy.

BACKGROUND: Although percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has been popularized as an alternative to microscopic lumbar discectomy, it has been reported to be associated with a re-herniation rate of 5-11%. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) might occur not only at the same level previously operated upon but also at the annular penetration site created during PELD procedures. METHOD: Biportal endoscopic paraspinal approach (BE-Para) was used for revisional foraminal lumbar discectomy. Procedures and some discussions regarding indications, advantages, potential complications, and ways to avoid complications were described. CONCLUSION: BE-Para may be an effective modality for RLDH after PELD.

Postoperative discal pseudocyst after percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy treated by drainage: Case report.

RATIONALE: This article reports 2 cases of symptomatic postoperative discal pseudocysts (PDP), a rare complication of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy (PELD). In this report, we propose a possible mechanism of PDP and introduce an effective therapeutic strategy. To our knowledge, there have been no reports of the use of indwelling drainage techniques for the PDP treatment after PELD. PATIENT CONCERNS: Herein, we report 2 cases of PDP after PELD in our hospital. Both patients had disc herniation at the L4/5 level, and the symptoms of low back pain and radiculopathy were significantly relieved after PELD. However, the signs in both 2 cases recurred 20 days after surgery. MRI indicated PDP in both 2 patients with high intensity on T1- and T2-weighted imaging in the primary surgical area. INTERVENTIONS: Given the progressive symptoms in both cases, PELD was performed again and 3-lumen drainage catheters were placed at the surgical site for adequate drainage. OUTCOMES: The patient's symptoms were significantly relieved after adequate drainage and disappeared 3 months after surgery. There was no clinical or MRI recurrence at the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: According to operative findings, we found that PDP symptoms may not be attributable mainly to cyst compression but to the excessive accumulation of local inflammatory factors. Treatment of PELD combined with indwelling drainage is feasible and effective in treating PDP.