RESUMEN
The incidence of spondylodiscitis has witnessed a significant increase in recent decades. Surgical intervention becomes necessary in case of bone destruction to remove infected tissue and restore spinal stability, often involving the implantation of a cage. Despite appropriate treatment, relapses occur in up to 20 percent of cases, resulting in substantial economic and social burdens. The formation of biofilm has been identified as a major contributor to relapse development. Currently, there is no consensus among German-speaking spinal surgeons or in the existing literature regarding the preferred choice of material to minimize relapse rates. Thus, the objective of this study is to investigate whether certain materials used in spinal implants exhibit varying degrees of susceptibility to bacterial attachment, thereby providing valuable insights for improving treatment outcomes.Eight cages of each PEEK, titanium-coated PEEK (Ti-PEEK), titanium (Ti), polyetherketoneketone (PEKK), tantalum (Ta) and antibiotic-loaded bone cement were incubated with 20% human plasma for 24 h. Subsequently, four implants were incubated with S. aureus for 24 h or 48 h each. The biofilm was then removed by sonication and the attained solution plated for Colony Forming Units (CFU) counting. Scanning electron microscopy was used to confirm bacterial attachment. The CFUs have been compared directly and in relation to the cages surface area. The surface area of the implants was PEEK 557 mm2, Ti-PEEK 472 mm2, Ti 985 mm2, PEKK 594 mm2, Ta 706 mm2, bone cement 123 mm2. The mean CFU count per implant and per mm2 surface area after 24 h and after 48 h was calculated. Bone cement was found to have significantly more CFUs per mm2 surface area than the other materials tested. When comparing the CFU count per implant, bone cement was statistically significantly more prone to biofilm formation than PEEK after 48 h. There was no statistical significance between the other materials when comparing both CFU count per mm2 surface area and CFU count per implant. The electron microscopic analysis showed the attachment of the bacteria, as well as production of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) as a sign for beginning biofilm formation. Antibiotic-loaded bone cement has shown statistically significantly more bacterial attachment than the other examined materials. No difference was found between the other materials regarding bacterial attachment after 24 h and 48 h. Proposed hypotheses for further studies include testing whether differences become apparent after longer incubation or with different pathogens involved in the pathogenesis of pyogenic spondylodiscitis.
Asunto(s)
Biopelículas , Discitis , Prótesis e Implantes , Staphylococcus aureus , Titanio , Biopelículas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Staphylococcus aureus/fisiología , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Discitis/microbiología , Discitis/cirugía , Prótesis e Implantes/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Polímeros/química , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Adhesión Bacteriana , Cementos para Huesos , Benzofenonas , Polietilenglicoles/química , CetonasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To date, there are no standardized treatment algorithms or recommendations for patients with infective endocarditis (IE) and concomitant spondylodiscitis (SD). Therefore, our aim was to analyse whether the sequence of surgical treatment of IE and SD has an impact on postoperative outcome and to identify risk factors for survival and postoperative recurrence. METHODS: Patients with IE underwent surgery in 4 German university hospitals between 1994 and 2022. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify possible predictors of 30-day/1-year mortality and recurrence of IE and/or SD. RESULTS: From the total IE cohort (n = 3991), 150 patients (4.4%) had concomitant SD. Primary surgery for IE was performed in 76.6%, and primary surgery for SD in 23.3%. The median age was 70.0 (64.0-75.6) years and patients were mostly male (79.5%). The most common pathogens detected were enterococci and Staphylococcus aureus followed by streptococci, and coagulase-negative Staphylococci. If SD was operated on first, 30-day mortality was significantly higher than if IE was operated on 1st (25.7% vs 11.4%; P = 0.037) and we observed a tendency for a higher 1-year mortality. If IE was treated 1st, we observed a higher recurrence rate within 1 year (12.2% vs 0%; P = 0.023). Multivariable analysis showed that primary surgery for SD was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Primary surgical treatment for SD was an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality. When IE was treated surgically 1st, the recurrence rate of IE and/or SD was higher.
Asunto(s)
Discitis , Recurrencia , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Discitis/cirugía , Discitis/microbiología , Discitis/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Endocarditis Bacteriana/cirugía , Endocarditis Bacteriana/mortalidad , Endocarditis Bacteriana/microbiología , Endocarditis/cirugía , Endocarditis/mortalidad , Alemania/epidemiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND Pyogenic spondylodiscitis is infection of the intervertebral disc or discs and the adjacent vertebrae. This retrospective study aimed to compare the effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar debridement (PELD) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in 40 patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PSD). MATERIAL AND METHODS Medical records of patients who underwent PELD (n=18) or PLIF (n=22) for PSD between 2018 and 2023 were reviewed. The recorded outcomes encompassed surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) measurements, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) assessments, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, duration of hospitalization, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grading, lumbar sagittal parameters, and the incidence of complications. RESULTS The PELD group had shorter surgical duration, less intraoperative blood loss, and shorter length of hospital stay compared to the PLIF group (P<0.01). At the last follow-up, both groups had significant improvement in ESR, CRP levels, and ASIA classification (P<0.001), but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P>0.05). The PELD group had lower ODI and VAS ratings at 1 month and 3 months, respectively (P<0.01). The PLIF group had significant improvements in intervertebral space height and lumbar lordosis angle (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS Both PLIF and PELD surgical approaches demonstrate adequate clinical efficacy in the treatment of monosegmental PSD. PLIF can better ensure more spinal stability than PELD, but PELD offers advantages such as reduced minimal surgical trauma, shorter operative duration, and faster recovery after surgery.
Asunto(s)
Desbridamiento , Discitis , Vértebras Lumbares , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Fusión Vertebral , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Discitis/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Desbridamiento/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Anciano , Adulto , Endoscopía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación , Tempo OperativoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The incidence of spondylodiscitis is rising across Europe, but the ideal treatment approach remains controversial. The choice between conservative and surgical therapies is ambiguous due to a lack of consensus. This European survey aimed to explore prevailing treatment paradigms for primary spondylodiscitis. METHODS: Spine neurosurgeons were invited through the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies Spine Section's mailing list to participate in an online survey featuring 7 spondylodiscitis case vignettes. Along with general management queries, specific patient treatment questions were posed. Data analysis was performed using R software (version 4.0.4). The index of qualitative variation (IQV) was calculated to quantify the variability in responses. RESULTS: A total of 130 responses were collected, comprising 86.9% board-certified neurosurgeons and 13.1% neurosurgeons in training, with an average of 11 years of practice. Most respondents performed 50-100 spine surgeries annually, with 66.7% specializing in spine surgery. An epidural empyema causing pronounced neurological deficits influenced 95.4% toward a surgical intervention, and mild neurological deficits and challenges in pathogen identification prompted 72.3% and 80%, respectively, to consider a surgical approach. Vertebral body destruction and spinal deformity directed 60% and 66.2%, respectively, toward surgery, whereas advanced age and comorbidities had a much smaller impact-5.4% and 9.2%, respectively. Clinical vignettes highlighted a predominant preference for conservative treatment in specific cases, with statistical significance (p < 0.05). The IQV values evaluated for each question ranged from 0.88 to 0.99, indicating low agreement across all questions among respondents. When examining the average IQV by country, intercountry variations in IQV were substantial, as illustrated by the diverse range of overall mean IQV values (0.15-0.85). CONCLUSIONS: The findings reveal a significant variability in the treatment of spondylodiscitis among European neurosurgeons, with most neurosurgeons opting for conservative treatment. These diverse strategies, both between and within countries, highlight an imperative for evidence-backed guidelines and consensus statements for this grave condition.
Asunto(s)
Discitis , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Humanos , Discitis/cirugía , Europa (Continente) , Masculino , Neurocirujanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Sociedades Médicas , AncianoRESUMEN
Retrospective observational study. To determine the efficacy and safety of bioactive glass ceramics mixed with autograft in the treatment of spondylodiscitis. Thirty-four patients with spondylodiscitis underwent surgery using autologous bone graft augmented by antibiotic loaded bioactive glass ceramic granules. Twenty-five patients aging 6 to 77, completed 1-year follow-up. The lumbosacral junction was affected in 3, lumbar spine in 13, one each in the dorso-lumbar junction and sacrum, and 7 dorsal spines. The organism isolated was Mycobacterium tuberculosis in 15, Methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) in 4, Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 4, Klebsiella pneumoniae in one, Burkholderia pseudomallei in 1, and mixed infections in 2. All patients had appropriate antibiotic therapy based on culture and sensitivity. Clinical and radiological evaluation of all the patients was done at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the surgery. Twenty-three patients improved clinically and showed radiographic fusion between 6 and 9 months. The patient with Burkholderia infection died due to fulminant septicemia with multi organ failure while another patient died at 9 months due to an unrelated cardiac event. The mean Visual Analogue Score (VAS) at the end of 1-year was 2 with radiological evidence of fusion in all patients. There were no re-infections or discharging wounds, and the 30-day re-admission rate was 0. Bioactive glass ceramics is a safe and effective graft expander in cases of spondylodiscitis. The absorption of antibiotics into the ceramic appears to help the elimination of infection.
Asunto(s)
Discitis , Fusión Vertebral , Humanos , Cerámica/efectos adversos , Cerámica/uso terapéutico , Discitis/cirugía , Discitis/microbiología , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Proyectos Piloto , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Niño , AncianoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate the fusion construct properties, construct length, intervertebral prosthesis (IVP) selection, bone grafting methods, complications management, and follow-up outcomes of spondylodiscitis fusion. METHOD: This case series was conducted in Al-Zahra University referral hospital from March 2016 to November 2021. All the surgery-eligible patients were enrolled. Those who did not participate or failed the neurosurgical intervention were excluded. A unified neurosurgical protocol was defined. After operation and follow-up, all variables were documented. IBM SPSS v.26 was used for data analysis. P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. RESULT: Ninety-two patients were reviewed in the final analysis with 65.2 % males. The mean age was 55.07 ± 14.22 years old. The most frequent level of pathology and surgery was the lumbar spine (48.9 %). Short and long constructs were almost equally used (57.6 and 42.4 %, respectively). Bone graft mixture was the dominant IVP (75 %). The most frequent persistent postoperative symptom was back pain (55.4 %), while the neurological deficits resolution rate was 76.7 %. The fusion rate was 92.3 %. Proximal junctional kyphosis incidence was 16.3 % and had a significant association with on-admission neurological symptoms, thoracic and thoracolumbar junction involvements (p < 0.05). Follow-up Oswestry disability index scores showed 44.6 % of the patients had mild or no functional disabilities. Advanced age, On-admission deficits, comorbidities, titanium cages, and poor fusion status were associated with poor functional outcomes and higher mortality rates (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The introduced neurosurgical protocol could effectively achieve acceptable SD treatment, spine stabilization, and fusion with low long-term surgical complications. Autologous bone graft mixture in comparison to titanium cages showed a higher fusion rate with a lower mortality rate. Patients with older age, neurological symptoms, and comorbidities are expected to experience less favorable clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Discitis , Fusión Vertebral , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Discitis/cirugía , Titanio , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have substantial treatment abandonment and non-adherence with outpatient oral medications. This work sought to investigate outcomes of postoperative discitis treated with debridement and a novel technique focused on reducing outpatient antibiotic requirement in an LMIC setting. METHODS: This study, conducted and reported following STROBE guidelines, reviewed outcomes of all patients with postoperative discitis who had been debrided by 1 neurosurgeon in a resource-limited setting during 2008-2020. Patients had undergone single-level L4-L5 or L5-S1 discectomy elsewhere, later developing magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed discitis. After non-response or deterioration following intravenous antibiotics, patients underwent early debridement, followed by in-patient antibiotic instillation into disc space for 2 weeks via drain. Study outcomes were modified Kirkaldy-Willis Grade, Japan Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and visual analog scale (VAS) score, all assessed at 1 year. RESULTS: Twelve patients were included, 10 male and 2 female, with median age of 46 (IQR 3.5) years. Debridement was done after median 82.5 (IQR 35) days and took median time of 105 (IQR 17.5) minutes. VAS scores (mean ± SD) decreased from 9.25 ± 0.75 preoperatively to 0.67 ± 0.89 1 year postoperatively (mean difference 8.58, 95% CI 8.01-9.15, P < 0.001). JOA scores (mean ± SD) improved from 4.5 ± 2.94 to 26.42 ± 1.31 1 year postoperatively (mean difference 21.92, 95% CI 20.57-23.26, P < 0.001). Kirkaldy-Willis grade was excellent in 6 (50%) patients, good in 5 (41.7%), and fair in 1 (8.3%). Patients became ambulatory within 2 weeks, with no major complications during 4.15 (IQR 3.45) years of median follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In LMICs, patients with medically refractory postoperative discitis potentially have good outcomes after debridement plus 2-week local antibiotic instillation.
Asunto(s)
Discitis , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Discitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Discitis/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Desbridamiento/métodos , Configuración de Recursos Limitados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The treatment of spinal infections is not well defined, and a cursory review of the literature can lead to conflicting treatment strategies. To add to the complexity, infections can include primary infection of the spine, infection secondary to another primary source, and postoperative infections including epidural abscesses, discitis, osteomyelitis, paraspinal soft-tissue infections, or any combination. Furthermore, differing opinions often exist within the medical and surgical communities regarding the outcomes and effectiveness of varying treatment strategies. Given the paucity of defined treatment protocols and long-term follow-up, it is important to develop multidisciplinary treatment teams and treatment strategies. This, along with defined protocols for the treatment of varying infections, can provide the data needed for improved treatment of spinal infections.
Asunto(s)
Discitis , Absceso Epidural , Osteomielitis , Humanos , Discitis/diagnóstico , Discitis/cirugía , Absceso Epidural/diagnóstico , Absceso Epidural/cirugía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Osteomielitis/diagnóstico , Osteomielitis/terapia , Columna VertebralRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Spondylodiscitis refers to infection of the intervertebral disk and neighboring structures. Outcomes based on instrumentation type are not well reported in the literature, but are important in establishing guidelines for surgical management of spondylodiscitis. This study aims to clarify the effect of instrumentation material selection on clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with spondylodiscitis. METHODS: Studies that evaluated the use of polyetheretherketone (PEEK), titanium, allograft, and/or autologous bone grafts for spondylodiscitis were identified in the literature. Radiographic and clinical data were analyzed using a meta-analysis of proportions, with estimated risk and confidence intervals reported for our primary study outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-two retrospective studies totaling 1088 patients undergoing surgical management of spondylodiscitis with PEEK, TTN, allograft, and autologous bone graft instrumentation were included. There were no differences in fusion rates (p-interaction = 0.55) with rates of fusion of 93.4% with TTN, 98.6% with allograft, 84.2% with autologous bone graft, and 93.9% with PEEK. There were no differences in screw loosening (p-interaction = 0.52) with rates of 0.33% with TTN, 0% with allograft, 1.3% with autologous bone graft, and 8.2% with PEEK. There were no differences in reoperation (p-interaction = 0.59) with rates of 2.64% with TTN, 0% with allograft, 1.69% with autologous bone graft, and 3.3% with PEEK. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates that the choice of instrumentation type in the surgical management of spondylodiscitis resulted in no significant differences in rate of radiographic fusion, screw loosening, or reoperation. Future comparative studies to optimize guidelines for the management of spondylodiscitis are needed.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante Óseo , Discitis , Humanos , Discitis/cirugía , Trasplante Óseo/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Fusión Vertebral/instrumentación , Cetonas , Benzofenonas , Polímeros , TitanioRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Subaxial cervical spine spondylodiscitis represents a real challenge in spine surgery. In later stages multiple spinal metamers can the interested by the pathological infection and the alteration of the spinal stability leading to spinal deformity. There is scant literature on subaxial cervical spondylodiscitis management and especially on ≥three-level cervical corpectomies. The authors conducted a literature search on this specific topic and presented an emblematic case of a patient treated with circumferential cervical fixation and four-level cervicothoracic corpectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was performed using the combined Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms (multilevel) AND (sub axial spine OR cervical spine) AND (spine osteomyelitis OR spinal osteomyelitis), to search in the PubMed and Scopus databases. Our case was also included in this literature review. From our literature search the authors selected 13 papers, eight were excluded because they did not match our inclusion criteria (the involvement of only one or two levels, or did not perform corpectomy, discectomy, or cervical spine localization). The authors also presented a 71-year-old patient, in poor general clinical status who underwent several cage repositioning, with a final four-level corpectomy (C5, C6, C7, and T1), expandable C5-T1 cage positioning and C4-T2 anterior plating performed merging augmented reality, neuronavigation and intraoperative imaging. RESULTS: This systematic review included 28 patients treated with ≥ three-level corpectomy (11 patients with three-level corpectomy, 15 patients with four-level corpectomy, and 2 patients with six-level corpectomy), 6 women, 5 men, and 17 not reported specifically, with a mean age of 55.9 years (range: 44-72 years). The combined anterior and posterior approach was taken in all but one case, which was treated with the anterior approach only. In one case of six-level cervicothoracic corpectomy, sternotomy was necessary. All reported patients recovered after surgery, except one who died after nosocomial pneumonia. No major intraoperative complications were reported. Usual postoperative complications include wound hematoma, pneumonia, subsidence, epidural hematoma, dural leakage, dysphagia, soft tissue swelling. The mean follow-up time was 31.9 months (range: 8-110 months). CONCLUSION: According to the literature search performed by the authors, multilevel corpectomies for cervical spinal osteomyelitis is a safe and effective complex surgical procedure, even in extended procedures involving up to six levels or those at the cervicothoracic junction. The use multimodal navigation merging intraoperative imaging acquisition, navigation, and augmented reality may provide useful information during implant positioning in complex and altered anatomy and for assessing the best final result.
Asunto(s)
Realidad Aumentada , Discitis , Osteomielitis , Espondilosis , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Discitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Discitis/cirugía , Vértebras Cervicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , HematomaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Spondylodiscitis secondary to colposacropexy is an extremely rare entity. Infection and mesh rejection are the main causes. Removal of the mesh is essential for patient's recovery and it can be a very challenging surgical procedure. CASE: A 72-year-old woman presented with severe low back pain in the context of a recent colposacropexy. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed and spondylodiscitis secondary to prolapse correction surgery with mesh was suspected. In order to ensure an adequate recovery, removal of the mesh was required. CONCLUSIONS: Spondylodiscitis secondary to colposacropexy should be suspected when the patient starts with moderate lumbar pain and is not correctly controlled with first-level analgesia. Infection or mesh rejection should be considered. Mesh rejection should be suspected when the patient does not improve after antibiotics. Complete removal of the mesh is needed in order to ensure the patient's recovery.
Asunto(s)
Discitis , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Discitis/etiología , Discitis/cirugía , Rechazo de Injerto , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Spondylodiscitis is the commonest spine infection, and pyogenic spondylodiscitis is the most common subtype. Whilst antibiotic therapy is the mainstay of treatment, some advocate that early surgery can improve mortality, relapse rates, and length of stay. Given that the condition carries a high mortality rate of up to 20%, the most effective treatment must be identified. We aimed to compare the mortality, relapse rate, and length of hospital stay of conservative versus early surgical treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis. All major databases were searched for original studies, which were evaluated using a qualitative synthesis, meta-analyses, influence, and regression analyses. The meta-analysis, with an overall pooled sample size of 10,954 patients from 21 studies, found that the pooled mortality among the early surgery patient subgroup was 8% versus 13% for patients treated conservatively. The mean proportion of relapse/failure among the early surgery subgroup was 15% versus 21% for the conservative treatment subgroup. Further, it concluded that early surgical treatment, when compared to conservative management, is associated with a 40% and 39% risk reduction in relapse/failure rate and mortality rate, respectively, and a 7.75 days per patient reduction in length of hospital stay (p < 0.01). The meta-analysis demonstrated that early surgical intervention consistently significantly outperforms conservative management in relapse/failure and mortality rates, and length of stay, in patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis.
Asunto(s)
Discitis , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Discitis/cirugía , Tratamiento Conservador , Bases de Datos Factuales , Intervención Educativa PrecozRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Surgical procedures in critically ill patients with spondylodiscitis are challenging and there are several controversies. Here, we present our experience with offering surgical intervention early in critically ill septic patients with spondylodiscitis. METHOD: After we introduced a new treatment paradigm offering early but limited surgery, eight patients with spondylodiscitis complicated by severe sepsis and multiple organ failure underwent urgent surgical treatment over a 10-year period. Outcome was assessed according to the Barthel index at 12-month follow-up and at the last available follow-up (mean 89 months). RESULTS: There were 7 men and 1 woman, with a mean age of 62 years. The preoperative ASA score was 5 in 2 patients, and 4 in 6 patients. Six of them presented with high-grade paresis, and in all of them, spondylodiscitis with intraspinal and/or paravertebral abscesses was evident in MR imaging studies. All patients underwent early surgery (within 24 h after admission). The median time in intensive care was 21 days. Out of the eight patients, seven survived. One year after surgery, five patients had a good outcome (Barthel index: 100 (1); 80 (3); and 70 (1)). At the last follow-up (mean 89 months), 4 patients had a good functional outcome (Barthel index between 60 and 80). CONCLUSION: Early surgical treatment in critically ill patients with spondylodiscitis and sepsis may result in rapid control of infection and can provide favorable long-term outcome. A general strategy of performing only limited surgery is a valid option in such patients who have a relatively high risk for surgery.
Asunto(s)
Discitis , Sepsis , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Discitis/complicaciones , Discitis/cirugía , Enfermedad Crítica , Sepsis/cirugía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Cuidados Críticos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine threshold values of validated quality of life (QoL) scores, including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI), for predicting a successful outcome following surgical treatment of lumbar spondylodiscitis (LS). METHODS: Patients with lumbar spondylodiscitis (LS) undergoing surgery in a tertiary referral hospital were included prospectively from 2008-2019. Data were collected both before surgery (T0) and one year after surgery (T1). QoL was measured using ODI and COMI. The successful clinical outcome was defined by the combination of the following four criteria: no recurrence of spondylodiscitis, back pain ≤4 on visual analogue scale or relief of ≥3 points, absence of LS-related neurological deficit, and radiological fusion of the affected segment. For subgroup analysis, group 1 consisted of patients with a favorable treatment outcome (meeting all four criteria), while group 2 included patients with unfavorable treatment outcome (meeting ≤3 criteria). RESULTS: Ninety-two LS patients (median age = 66 years; age range = 57-74) were analyzed. QoL scores improved significantly. Threshold values for the ODI and COMI were calculated at 35 and 4.2 points, respectively. The area under curve for the ODI was 0.856 (95%-CI 0.767- 0.945; P<0.001) and 0.839 (95% CI-0.749-0.928; P<0.001) for the COMI score. Eighty percent of patients achieved a favorable outcome. CONCLUSION: Objective measurement and evaluation of successful surgical treatment of spondylodiscitis require defined thresholds of quality of life scores. We were able to define such thresholds for Oswestry Disability Index and Core Outcome Measures Index. These can be useful to assess clinically relevant changes and therefore allow a more precise estimation of the post-surgical outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, Prognostic study.
Asunto(s)
Discitis , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Discitis/diagnóstico , Discitis/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Dolor de Espalda , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugíaRESUMEN
Few reports have been conducted to comparing surgical results and safety evaluations between the different types of infections in geriatric patients with thoracolumbar infections. The aim of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of surgical treatment for thoracolumbar infections in elderly patients. 21 patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PS) and 26 patients with tuberculous spondylodiscitis (TS) were enrolled in the study. All patients were treated using one-stage posterior debridement, decompression, and pedicle screw fixation. Comparison of operative safety parameters between the two groups. Clinical efficacy was evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) score, the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade, the short form (SF)-36 survey and Oswestry disability index (ODI) to determine patient quality of life pre- and post-operatively. Hospitalisation and intensive care unit duration in the PS group were significantly shorter than in the TS group (P < 0.05). The total incidence of post-operative complications for both groups was 44.7%. More complications occurred in the TS group, but the difference was not significant. The scores of VAS, ODI and SF-36 of all 47 patients were significantly improved compared with those before operation.The VAS and SF-36 scores (physical component) were significantly better in the PS group 6 months post-operatively, and the SF-36 (mental component) scores were significantly better in the PS group at the 1-year follow-up. Neurological status in both groups improved post-operatively, and 83% of patients reported satisfactory results based on the modified MacNab standard. Imaging results showed that bone graft fusion improved in both groups at 6 months, 1 year and at the final follow-up. One-stage posterior debridement, decompression, interbody fusion, and internal fixation can be considered a safe and effective method of treating spinal infections in the elderly. This method can improve nerve function, reconstruct spinal stability, and enhance the quality of life of elderly patients. Both PS and TS who underwent surgery achieve similar clinical and radiological results.
Asunto(s)
Discitis , Fusión Vertebral , Humanos , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Discitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Discitis/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Purpose: There have been many studies in the operative management of pyogenic spondylodiscitis with foreign materials. However, it still remains an issue of debate on whether the allografts may be used in pyogenic spondylodiscitis. This study sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of PEEK cages and the cadaveric allograft in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for treating lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Methods: From January 2012 to December 2019, 56 patients underwent surgery for lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis. The posterior debridement of all patients and their fusion with allografts, local bone grafts, and bone chip cages were performed before posterior pedicle screw fusion. An assessment of the residual pain, the grade of neurological injury, and the resolution of infection was conducted on 39 patients. The clinical outcome was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and neurological outcomes were appraised based on Frankel grades. The radiological outcomes were evaluated via focal lordosis, lumbar lordosis, and the state of the fusion. Results: Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis were the most common causative organisms. The mean preoperative focal lordosis was -1.2° (-11.4° to 5.7°), and the mean postoperative focal lordosis increased to 10.3° (4.3°-17.2°). At the final follow-up, there were five cases with subsidence of the cage, no case of recurrence, and no case with cage and screw loosening or migration. The mean preoperative VAS and ODI scores were 8.9 and 74.6%, respectively, and improvements in VAS and ODI were 6.6 ± 2.2 and 50.4 ± 21.3%, respectively. The Frankel grade D was found in 10 patients and grade C in 7. Following the final follow-up, only one patient improved from Frankel grade C to grade D while the others recovered completely. Conclusion: The PEEK cage and cadaveric allograft combined with local bone grafts is a safe and effective choice for intervertebral fusion and restoring sagittal alignment without increased incidence of relapse for treating lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis.
Asunto(s)
Discitis , Lordosis , Fusión Vertebral , Humanos , Discitis/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Polietilenglicoles/uso terapéutico , Cetonas/uso terapéutico , Aloinjertos , CadáverRESUMEN
Aspergillus spondylodiscitis is a rare entity reported in the literature. In tuberculosis endemic regions like India, more often it could be misdiagnosed as tuberculous spondylodiscitis. Herein we report a case series of three patients with Aspergillus spondylodiscitis presenting with chronic low backpain and clinically diagnosed as tuberculosis spine. Culture and histopathological examination of the debrided tissue provided a definite diagnosis. Interestingly, one of the cases had coexisting tuberculosis spine. All three patients underwent surgical intervention-debridement, decompression and fusion of spine and combined medical management with voriconazole with successful outcome.
Asunto(s)
Discitis , Humanos , Discitis/diagnóstico , Discitis/cirugía , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Vértebras Lumbares , Aspergillus , Voriconazol/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The paper presents a monocentric retrospective study of patients treated surgically for spinal tuberculosis. Clinical and radiological results are analysed, early and late complications are recorded. The study aims to answer the following questions. 1. Can we use instrumentation to restore the stability and alignment in the infected spinal focus? 2. Should we always perform radical anterior resection of TBC lesions? 3. What is the prognosis of surgical treatment of TBC patients with neurological deficit manifestation? MATERIAL AND METHODS Between 2010 and 2020, a total of 12 patients were treated for spinal tuberculosis at our department, of whom 9 patients (5 men, 4 women) with the mean age of 47.3 years (range 29 to 83 years) underwent a surgery. A total of three patients were operated on before the final confirmation of the TBC and treatment with antituberculosis medication, four patients in the initial therapy phase and two patients in the continuous phase. Two patients only underwent a non-instrumented decompression surgery followed by external support fixation. In the other seven patients, always with spinal deformity, instrumentation was used (3 cases of isolated posterior decompression, transpedicular fixation, posterior fusion, 4 cases of anteroposterior instrumented reconstruction). In 2 cases a structural bone graft and in 2 cases an expandable titanium cage were used for anterior column reconstruction. RESULTS Of the total number of patients, altogether eight patients were assessed at 1 year after surgery (one 83-year-old patient died from heart failure 4 months after surgery). Of the remaining eight patients, three patients exhibited a neurological deficit and postoperative regression of the finding. The McCormick score improved from the preoperative mean score of 3.25 to 1.62 at 1 year after surgery (p < 0.001). The clinical VAS score regressed from 5.75 to 1.63 at 1 year after surgery (p < 0.001). Radiographic healing of the anterior fusion was achieved in all patients, both after decompression and instrumented surgery. The initial mean kyphosis of 20.36 degrees of the operated segment measured by the mCobb angle was corrected to 14.6 degrees postoperatively, with a subsequent slight deterioration to 14.86 degrees (p < 0.05). The greatest correction was achieved in patients who had undergone a two-stage surgery with anterior resection and AP reconstruction. DISCUSSION In our cohort, titanium instrumentation was used in seven of nine patients. One patient only manifested persistent tuberculosis with nonspecific bacterial flora superinfection. Revision surgery with anterior radical debridement and subsequent treatment with antituberculotic drugs healed the patient. There were four patients with major preoperative neurological deficit persisting more than 2 weeks before the final treatment with subsequent improvement in all cases. These patients were treated with anteroposterior reconstruction and anterior radical debridement. CONCLUSIONS No increased risk of recurrent infection associated with the use of spinal instrumentation was found in the study. Anterior radical debridement is performed in patients with manifested kyphotic deformity and spinal canal compression, followed by reconstruction with a structural bone graft or a titanium cage. The other patients are treated based on the principle of "optimal" debridement with or without the use of transpedicular instrumentation. If adequate spinal canal decompression and stability are achieved, neurological improvement can be anticipated even in case of a major neurological deficit. Key words: spine tuberculosis, tuberculous spondylitis, Pott's disease, anterior debridement, spine instrumentation.
Asunto(s)
Discitis , Fusión Vertebral , Tuberculosis de la Columna Vertebral , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Tuberculosis de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Discitis/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Titanio , Desbridamiento/métodos , Descompresión Quirúrgica , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugíaRESUMEN
Surgical procedures with spinal instrumentation constitute a prevalent and occasionally highly indicated treatment modality in patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PSD). However, surgical therapy might be associated with the need of prolonged postoperative intensive care medicine which in turn might impair intended operative benefit. Therefore, we analyzed prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) as an indicator variable for such intensive care treatment with regard to potential correlations with mortality in this vulnerable patient cohort. Between 2012 and 2018, 177 consecutive patients received stabilization surgery for PSD at the authors' neurosurgical department. PMV was defined as postoperative mechanical ventilation of more than 24 h. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent predictors for 30-day mortality. Twenty-three out of 177 patients (13%) with PSD suffered from postoperative PMV. Thirty-day mortality rate was 5%. Multivariable analysis identified "spinal empyema" (p = 0.02, odds ratio (OR) 6.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-30.2), "Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) > 2" (p = 0.04, OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.0-15.5), "early postoperative complications (PSIs)" (p = 0.001, OR 17.1, 95% CI 3.1-96.0) and "PMV > 24 hrs" (p = 0.002, OR 13.0, 95% CI 2.7-63.8) as significant and independent predictors for early postoperative mortality. The present study indicates PMV to significantly correlate to elevated early postoperative mortality rates following stabilization surgery for PSD. These results might entail further scientific efforts to investigate PMV as a so far underestimated negative prognostic factor in the surgical treatment of PSD.
Asunto(s)
Discitis , Humanos , Discitis/cirugía , Respiración Artificial , Cuidados Críticos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , BiomarcadoresRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Surgical classifications for spondylodiscitis (SD) typically include radiologic features and the status of neurologic impairment. Clinical factors such as preoperative pain, function/disability, overall quality of life (QoL), and risk of recurrence and mortality, which are necessary for a comprehensive assessment of SD and measurement of treatment success, are not considered. There is a lack of external validation of SD classifications. The aim of this study was to validate classifications of SD and to correlate these classifications with the above clinical factors. METHODS: One hundred fourteen patients from a prospective SD register (2008-2020) with available imaging, preoperative neurologic status, backpain, function/disability data (Oswestry Disability Index and Core Outcome Measures Index), QoL data (Short Form 36, European Quality-of-life Questionnaire), and a 1-year follow-up were retrospectively classified according to Akbar, Homagk, and Pola classifications. Interrater reliability, correlation among classifications, and correlation between classifications and QoL were calculated. RESULTS: Interrater reliability was κ = 0.83 for Akbar, κ = 0.94 for Homagk, and κ = 0.99 for Pola. The correlation of Akbar with Pola and Homagk was moderate (ρ s = 0.47; ρ s = 0.46) and high between Pola and Homagk (ρ s = 0.7). No notable correlation was observed between any of the classifications and preoperative Oswestry Disability Index, Core Outcome Measures Index, QoL, mortality, and recurrence within 1 year. Only a weak correlation was observed between Homagk and preoperative leg pain and back pain. CONCLUSION: Available SD classifications have a very good interrater reliability and moderate-to-high correlation with each other but lack correlation with preoperative pain, function/disability, and overall QoL. Because these factors are important for a comprehensive assessment of SD in severity, decision making, and prognosis, they should be included in future SD classifications. This could allow for more comprehensive treatment algorithms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II. Diagnostic study = prospective cohort study; development of diagnostic criteria. DATA AVAILABILITY: The data sets used and analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.