Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 324
Filtrar
1.
South Med J ; 117(8): 517-520, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39094806

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In hospitalized patients, cigarette smoking is linked to increased readmission rates, emergency department visits, and overall mortality. Smoking cessation reduces these risks, but many patients who smoke are unsuccessful in quitting. Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is an effective tool that assists patients who smoke with quitting. This study evaluates NRT prescriptions during and after hospitalization at a large health system for patients who smoke. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to determine the number of patients who were prescribed NRT during an inpatient admission and at time of discharge from a network of nine hospitals across South Carolina between January 1, 2019 and January 1, 2023. RESULTS: This study included 20,757 patients identified as actively smoking with at least one hospitalization during the study period. Of the cohort, 34.9% were prescribed at least one prescription for NRT during their admission to the hospital. Of the patients identified, 12.6% were prescribed NRT upon discharge from the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified significantly low rates of NRT prescribed to smokers during hospitalization and at discharge. Although the management of chronic conditions is typically addressed in the outpatient setting, hospitalization may provide an opportunity for patients to initiate health behavior changes. The low rates of prescriptions for NRT present an opportunity to improve tobacco treatment during hospitalization and beyond.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Terapia de Reemplazo de Nicotina , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia de Reemplazo de Nicotina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , South Carolina/epidemiología , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Addict Behav ; 158: 108104, 2024 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39042998

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare past 12-month use of cigarette smoking cessation aids (e.g., Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved cessation products or e-cigarettes for smoking cessation) among people with substance use problems (PWSUPs) who currently smoke to people without substance use problems (SUPs) who currently smoke cigarettes in a nationally representative US sample. METHODS: We used the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Wave 6 Study [n = 30,516]. Our sample comprised adult (18+) established cigarette smokers (100+ lifetime-sticks with daily/non-daily use) [n = 5,895]. The independent variable was SUP status (no, moderate, and high). The dependent variables were past-year use of: nicotine replacement therapies (NRTs), cessation medications [i.e., varenicline or bupropion], or e-cigarettes [for cigarette cessation and reduction]. Weighted multivariable logistic regression models for each dependent variable examined the associations between SUP status and each cessation aid, adjusting for cigarette dependence, daily cigarette smoking, and demographic factors. RESULTS: Among people who smoke, a higher proportion of respondents with high SUP severity used NRTs, cessation medications, and e-cigarettes for cigarette cessation, respectively (12.3%, 8.4%, 15.7%), compared to those with no/low SUP severity (9.8%, 6.0%, 8.9%). In the multivariable models, respondents with high SUPs had 63% (95% CI:1.16-2.29) higher odds of using e-cigarettes for cessation than those without SUPs. No significant differences were seen between high (vs. no/low SUPs) in the past-year use of NRTs and cessation medications. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that cigarette smokers with high SUPs had higher odds of using e-cigarettes for cessation and reduction compared to smokers without SUPs.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Agentes para el Cese del Hábito de Fumar/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven , Vareniclina/uso terapéutico , Bupropión/uso terapéutico , Fumar Cigarrillos/epidemiología , Fumar Cigarrillos/terapia , Adolescente , Conducta de Elección , Anciano
3.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(6): e2418120, 2024 Jun 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38935378

RESUMEN

Importance: Varenicline is the most effective sole pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation. If used in combination with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), cessation rates may be further improved, but the efficacy and safety of the combination need to be evaluated. Objective: To examine whether hospitalized smokers treated with varenicline and NRT lozenges achieve higher prolonged smoking abstinence rates compared with those treated with varenicline alone. Design, Setting, and Participants: A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted in adult medical or surgical inpatients of 5 Australian public hospitals with a history of smoking 10 cigarettes or more per day, interested in quitting, and available for 12-month follow-up between May 1, 2019, and May 1, 2021 (final 12-month data collection in May 2022). Data analysis was performed from June 1 to August 30, 2023. Interventions: A 12-week varenicline regimen was initiated during hospitalization at standard doses in all participants. Participants were randomized to additionally use NRT (2 mg) or placebo lozenges if there was an urge to smoke. Behavioral support (Quitline) was offered to all participants. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was biochemically verified sustained abstinence at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included self-reported prolonged abstinence, 7-day point prevalence abstinence (3, 6, and 12 months), and medicine-related adverse events. Results: A total of 320 participants (mean [SD] age, 52.5 [12.1] years; 183 [57.2%] male) were randomized. The conduct of biochemical verification was affected by COVID-19 restrictions; consequently, the biochemically verified abstinence in the intervention vs control arms (18 [11.4%] vs 16 [10.1%]; odds ratio [OR], 1.14; 95% CI, 0.56-2.33) did not support the combination therapy. The secondary outcomes in the intervention vs control arms of 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 6 months (54 [34.2%] vs 37 [23.4%]; OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.04-2.80), prolonged abstinence at 12 months (47 [29.9%] vs 30 [19.1%]; OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.05-3.00), and 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 12-months (48 [30.6%] vs 31 [19.7%]; OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.07-2.99) significantly improved with the combination therapy. The self-reported 6-month prolonged abstinence (61 [38.6%] vs 47 [29.7%]; OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 0.93-2.39) favored the combination therapy but was not statistically significant. Medicine-related adverse events were similar in the 2 groups (102 [74.5%] in the intervention group vs 86 [68.3%] in the control group). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of the combination of varenicline and NRT lozenges in hospitalized adult daily smokers, the combination treatment improved self-reported abstinence compared with varenicline alone, without compromising safety, but it did not improve biochemically validated abstinence. Trial Registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12618001792213.


Asunto(s)
Agentes para el Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco , Vareniclina , Humanos , Vareniclina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Método Doble Ciego , Adulto , Agentes para el Cese del Hábito de Fumar/uso terapéutico , Australia , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Fumadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Terapia de Reemplazo de Nicotina
4.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(6): e2419245, 2024 Jun 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38941092

RESUMEN

Importance: Significant evidence gaps exist regarding the safety of smoking cessation pharmacotherapies during pregnancy, especially for the risk of congenital malformations. Consequently, professional bodies advise against the use of varenicline and bupropion and recommend caution with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). Contemporary estimates of the use of smoking cessation pharmacotherapies during pregnancy are lacking. Objective: To quantify the proportion of individuals using prescribed smoking cessation pharmacotherapies during pregnancy and during the first trimester specifically, in 4 countries. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, population-based cohort study used linked birth records, hospital admission records, and dispensing records of prescribed medications from all pregnancies resulting in birth between 2015 and 2020 in New South Wales, Australia; New Zealand; Norway; and Sweden. Data analyses were conducted in October and November 2023. Exposure: Prescribed smoking cessation pharmacotherapy use (varenicline, NRT, and bupropion) during pregnancy was defined as days' supply overlapping the period from date of conception to childbirth. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prevalence of use among all pregnancies and pregnancies with maternal smoking were calculated. Among women who used a pharmacotherapy, the proportion of women with use during the first trimester of pregnancy was also calculated. Results: Among 1 700 638 pregnancies in 4 countries, 138 033 (8.1%) had maternal smoking and 729 498 (42.9%) were younger than 30 years. The prevalences ranged from 0.02% to 0.14% for varenicline, less than 0.01% to 1.86% for prescribed NRT, and less than 0.01% to 0.07% for bupropion. Among pregnant individuals who smoked, use of pharmacotherapies was up to 10 times higher, with maximum prevalences of 1.25% for varenicline in New South Wales, 11.39% for NRT in New Zealand, and 0.39% for bupropion in New Zealand. Use in the first trimester occurred among more than 90% of individuals using varenicline, approximately 60% among those using NRT, and 80% to 90% among those using bupropion. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of pregnant individuals in 4 high-income countries, the low prevalence of varenicline and bupropion use during pregnancy and higher prevalence of NRT use aligned with current clinical guidelines. As most use occurred in the first trimester, there is a need for evidence on the risk of congenital malformations for these medications.


Asunto(s)
Bupropión , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Agentes para el Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco , Vareniclina , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Agentes para el Cese del Hábito de Fumar/uso terapéutico , Vareniclina/uso terapéutico , Vareniclina/efectos adversos , Bupropión/uso terapéutico , Bupropión/efectos adversos , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Suecia/epidemiología , Nueva Gales del Sur/epidemiología , Noruega/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Fumar/epidemiología , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo
5.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1361186, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38841681

RESUMEN

Background and aims: Several pharmacological interventions, such as nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), varenicline, and bupropion, have been approved for clinical use of smoking cessation. E-cigarettes (EC) are increasingly explored by many RCTs for their potentiality in smoking cessation. In addition, some RCTs are attempting to explore new drugs for smoking cessation, such as cytisine. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to investigate how these drugs and e-cigarettes compare regarding their efficacy and acceptability. Materials and methods: This systematic review and NMA searched all clinical studies on smoking cessation using pharmacological monotherapies or e-cigarettes published from January 2011 to May 2022 using MEDLINE, COCHRANE Library, and PsychINFO databases. NRTs were divided into transdermal (TDN) and oronasal nicotine (ONN) by administrative routes, thus 7 network nodes were set up for direct and indirect comparison. Two different indicators measured the efficacy: prevalent and continuous smoking abstinence. The drop-out rates measured the acceptability. Results: The final 40 clinical studies included in this study comprised 77 study cohorts and 25,889 participants. Varenicline is more effective intervention to assist in smoking cessation during 16-32 weeks follow-up, and is very likely to prompt dropout. Cytisine shows more effectiveness in continuous smoking cessation but may also lead to dropout. E-cigarettes and oronasal nicotine are more effective than no treatment in encouraging prevalent abstinence, but least likely to prompt dropout. Finally, transdermal nicotine delivery is more effective than no treatment in continuous abstinence, with neither significant effect on prevalent abstinence nor dropout rate. Conclusion: This review suggested and agreed that Varenicline, Cytisine and transdermal nicotine delivery, as smoking cessation intervention, have advantages and disadvantages. However, we had to have reservations about e-cigarettes as a way to quit smoking in adolescents.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina , Metaanálisis en Red , Agentes para el Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco , Vareniclina , Humanos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina/estadística & datos numéricos , Vareniclina/uso terapéutico , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Agentes para el Cese del Hábito de Fumar/uso terapéutico , Alcaloides/uso terapéutico , Azocinas/uso terapéutico , Azocinas/administración & dosificación , Bupropión/uso terapéutico , Quinolizinas/uso terapéutico , Nicotina/administración & dosificación , Alcaloides de Quinolizidina
6.
Brain Behav ; 14(5): e3513, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698620

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Smoking is a risk factor for multiple sclerosis (MS) development, symptom burden, decreased medication efficacy, and increased disease-related mortality. Veterans with MS (VwMS) smoke at critically high rates; however, treatment rates and possible disparities are unknown. To promote equitable treatment, we aim to investigate smoking cessation prescription practices for VwMS across social determinant factors. METHODS: We extracted data from the national Veterans Health Administration electronic health records between October 1, 2017, and September 30, 2018. To derive marginal estimates of the association of MS with receipt of smoking-cessation pharmacotherapy, we used propensity score matching through the extreme gradient boosting machine learning model. VwMS who smoke were matched with veterans without MS who smoke on factors including age, race, depression, and healthcare visits. To assess the marginal association of MS with different cessation treatments, we used logistic regression and conducted stratified analyses by sex, race, and ethnicity. RESULTS: The matched sample achieved a good balance across most covariates, compared to the pre-match sample. VwMS (n = 3320) had decreased odds of receiving prescriptions for nicotine patches ([Odds Ratio]OR = 0.86, p < .01), non-patch nicotine replacement therapy (NRT; OR = 0.81, p < .001), and standard practice dual NRT (OR = 0.77, p < .01), compared to matches without MS (n = 13,280). Men with MS had lower odds of receiving prescriptions for nicotine patches (OR = 0.88, p = .05), non-patch NRT (OR = 0.77, p < .001), and dual NRT (OR = 0.72, p < .001). Similarly, Black VwMS had lower odds of receiving prescriptions for patches (OR = 0.62, p < .001), non-patch NRT (OR = 0.75, p < .05), and dual NRT (OR = 0.52, p < .01). The odds of receiving prescriptions for bupropion or varenicline did not differ between VwMS and matches without MS. CONCLUSION: VwMS received significantly less smoking cessation treatment, compared to matched controls without MS, showing a critical gap in health services as VwMS are not receiving dual NRT as the standard of care. Prescription rates were especially lower for male and Black VwMS, suggesting that under-represented demographic groups outside of the white female category, most often considered as the "traditional MS" group, could be under-treated regarding smoking cessation support. This foundational work will help inform future work to promote equitable treatment and implementation of cessation interventions for people living with MS.


Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Esclerosis Múltiple , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco , Veteranos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Esclerosis Múltiple/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos , Agentes para el Cese del Hábito de Fumar/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Bupropión/uso terapéutico , Vareniclina/uso terapéutico
7.
J Addict Med ; 18(4): 404-407, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38606851

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Tobacco contributes to the leading causes of morbidity and mortality among persons with human immunodeficiency virus (PWHs). Nonetheless, medications for tobacco use disorder are widely underused, particularly among PWHs. We sought to characterize the extent to which insurance barriers impacted access to medications for tobacco use disorder and, in comparison, to access to antiretroviral therapy (ART). METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of data on individuals enrolled in a randomized clinical trial to address tobacco use involving nicotine replacement therapy and, for some, additionally, varenicline or bupropion. Medication prescriptions are transmitted electronically from the clinic to neighborhood pharmacies. Data sources included participant assessments and intervention visit tracking forms. RESULTS: Of 93 participants enrolled from September 2020 to July 2021, 20 (22%) were unable to fill or had difficulty filling their nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) prescriptions because of insurance barriers. These fell into 2 broad categories: enrollment in a publicly insured managed care plan in which the pharmacy benefit manager excluded nonprescription NRT and lack of understanding by the pharmacy of the scope of coverage. Of these 20 participants, 5 (25%) were unable to obtain medications at all, and 3 of these participants dropped out of the study. One additional participant paid out-of-pocket to obtain NRT. No participant was denied coverage of ART, bupropion, or varenicline. CONCLUSIONS: Gaps in insurance coverage may result in PWHs receiving ART without simultaneous medical management of their tobacco use. This may undermine the efficacy of antivirals. Mandated insurance coverage of nonprescription NRT may improve the health of PWHs who smoke.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales , Infecciones por VIH , Cobertura del Seguro , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/economía , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/economía , Vareniclina/uso terapéutico , Bupropión/uso terapéutico , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Agentes para el Cese del Hábito de Fumar/uso terapéutico , Tabaquismo/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia de Reemplazo de Nicotina
8.
Addict Behav ; 155: 108025, 2024 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38593596

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: People in substance use disorder (SUD) treatment have a smoking prevalence that is five times higher than the national average. California funded the Tobacco Free for Recovery Initiative, designed to support programs in implementing tobacco-free grounds and increasing smoking cessation services. In the first cohort of the initiative (2018-2020) client smoking prevalence decreased from 54.2% to 26.6%. The current study examined whether similar findings would be replicated with a later cohort of programs (2020-2022). METHOD: Cross-sectional survey data were collected from clients in 11 residential SUD treatment programs at baseline (n = 185) and at post intervention (n = 227). Multivariate logistic regression assessed change over time in smoking prevalence, tobacco use behaviors, and receipt of cessation services across the two timepoints. RESULTS: Client smoking prevalence decreased from 60.3 % to 40.5 % (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] = 0.46, 95 % CI = 0.27, 0.78; p = 0.004). Current smokers and those who quit while in treatment reported an increase in nicotine replacement therapy (NRT)/pharmacotherapy from baseline to post intervention (31.9 % vs 45.6 %; AOR = 2.22, 95 % CI = 1.08, 4.58; p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Like the first cohort, the Tobacco Free for Recovery initiative was associated with decreased client smoking prevalence and an increase in NRT/pharmacotherapy. These findings strengthen the evidence that similar initiatives may be effective in reducing smoking prevalence among people in SUD treatment.


Asunto(s)
Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Humanos , California/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Prevalencia , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Tratamiento Domiciliario
9.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 26(7): 826-834, 2024 Jun 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38214664

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to (1) provide up-to-date estimates of how changes in the prevalence of e-cigarette use have been associated with changes in smoking cessation activities and use of licensed treatments among smokers in England and (2) explore any changes in these associations over time. METHODS: Data were aggregated quarterly on 67 548 past-year smokers between Q1-2007 and Q4-2022. Explanatory variables were the prevalence of (1) current e-cigarette use among smokers and (2) e-cigarette use during a quit attempt. Outcomes were rates of quit attempts and overall quits among past-year smokers, and the quit success rate and use of licensed treatments among those who made a quit attempt. RESULTS: The success rate of quit attempts increased by 0.040% (95% CI 0.019; 0.062) for every 1% increase in the prevalence of e-cigarette use during a quit attempt. No clear evidence was found for an association between current e-cigarette use and the quit attempt rate (Badj = 0.008 [95% CI -0.045; 0.061]) or overall quit rate (Badj = 0.063 [-0.031; 0.158]); or between use of e-cigarettes during a quit attempt and the overall quit rate (Badj = 0.030 [-0.054; 0.114]), use of prescription medication (varenicline/bupropion/nicotine replacement therapy [NRT]: Badj = -0.036 [-0.175; 0.102]), or use of over-the-counter NRT (Badj = -0.052 [-0.120; 0.015]). There was no clear evidence this pattern of associations has changed substantially over time. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in the prevalence of e-cigarette use in England through 2022 have been positively associated with the success rate of quit attempts but not clearly associated with the quit attempt rate, overall quit rate, or use of licensed smoking cessation treatments. IMPLICATIONS: If the association between the increase in e-cigarette use and the quit success rate is causal, then the use of e-cigarettes in quit attempts has helped in the region of 30 000 to 50 000 additional smokers in England to successfully quit each year since they became popular in 2013, over and above the number who were quitting before the advent of e-cigarettes.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Humanos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Prevalencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vapeo/epidemiología , Vapeo/tendencias , Fumadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Fumadores/psicología , Adulto Joven , Agentes para el Cese del Hábito de Fumar/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/tendencias , Anciano
10.
Biomed Res Int ; 2022: 5782228, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35237688

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the knowledge, practice, attitude, and preparedness of dental professionals in prescribing nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). Methodology. A prevalidated voluntary web-based questionnaire was generated as a link through Google Drive and was sent to 117 dental professionals in North India using Whatsapp, Messenger, and Instagram social media platforms. A total of 94 responses were received and out of which 76 responses were analyzed (18 forms were excluded due to incomplete or duplicate responses). Frequency analysis was done using SPSS software version 21. RESULT: The participation rate was found to be 80.3%. More than half of the study population were familiar with the term NRT (77.6%) and its uses (67.1%), but approximately less than half of the total study subjects knew the duration (32.9%), cost (27.6%), dosage (25%), and contraindications (36.8%) of the NRT. Approximately 56.6% of the study participants showed a positive attitude towards helping patients to quit smoking through tobacco cessation counseling. Nearly one-fourth of the study population, i.e., 27.6%, were confident in explaining the negative impacts of tobacco, while 22.4% knew about the tobacco cessation protocol. Among the participants, only 27.6% reported that they practice NRT and out of which approximately less than 20% of the study participants were prescribing correct dose of NRT. CONCLUSION: Though study subjects had an ample knowledge regarding NRT use in tobacco cessation, it does not reflect their current attitude and preparedness. Thus, there is a need for continuing education to further train dental professionals for prescribing NRT.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Relaciones Dentista-Paciente , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Adulto , Humanos , India , Nicotina/administración & dosificación , Rol del Médico , Atención Primaria de Salud , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos
11.
J Vasc Surg ; 75(1): 262-269, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34298118

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Tobacco use is common among vascular surgery patients and negatively impacts outcomes and longevity. In the second quarter of 2018, a statewide vascular quality collaborative launched an initiative across its 35 participating hospitals to promote smoking cessation at the time of surgery. This intervention was based on the Vascular Physician Offer and Report (VAPOR) trial and consisted of 3 components: brief physician-delivered advice, referral to telephone-based counseling, and nicotine replacement therapy. The goal of this study is to evaluate the results of this intervention. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing vascular surgery between 2018 and 2020. Procedures included open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, endovascular aneurysm repair, open vascular bypass, open thrombectomy, carotid endarterectomy, and carotid stenting. The primary explanatory variables were receipt of tobacco cessation interventions as documented in the medical record. The primary outcome was tobacco cessation, captured during 30-day and 1-year chart review and/or patient follow-up. A multivariable logistic regression model was calculated to estimate the association of covariates with smoking cessation while adjusting for patient and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 13,890 patients underwent surgery during the study period. The mean age was 69.4 ± 10 years; 4687 patients (34%) were female, and 5158 patients (37%) were current smokers. At least one smoking cessation component was delivered to 2245 patients (44% of smokers). The quit rate was 35% among 4671 patients with 30-day follow-up and 43% among 2936 patients with 1-year follow up. On multivariable regression, at 30 days, receiving two intervention components was associated with 1.29 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.55) higher odds of quitting. At both time points, smoking cessation was also associated with undergoing an emergent procedure (30-day odds ratio [OR], 1.52; 95% CI, 1.16-1.99; 1-year OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.01-1.97) and undergoing open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (30-day OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.20-2.43; 1-year OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.11-2.78). CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of vascular surgical patients where tobacco use was common, nearly one-half of patients quit smoking 1 year after surgery. Receiving two smoking cessation intervention components was associated with quitting at 30 days. Overall, these results demonstrate encouraging quit rates and identify an opportunity for longer-term intervention to maintain even greater 1-year tobacco cessation.


Asunto(s)
Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Fumar/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Consejo/organización & administración , Consejo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Motivación , Atención Perioperativa/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , Fumar/terapia , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(10): e2128810, 2021 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34665239

RESUMEN

Importance: Although e-cigarettes are not approved as a cessation device, many who smoke believe that e-cigarettes will help them quit cigarette smoking successfully. Objective: To assess whether people who recently quit smoking and who had switched to e-cigarettes or another tobacco product were less likely to relapse to cigarette smoking compared with those who remained tobacco free. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study analyzed a nationally representative sample of US households that participated in 4 waves of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study (conducted 2013 through 2017), combining 2 independent cohorts each with 3 annual surveys. Eligible participants were individuals who smoked at baseline, had recently quit at the first follow-up, and completed the second follow-up survey. Exposures: Use of e-cigarettes or alternate tobacco products at follow-up 1 after recently quitting smoking. Main Outcomes and Measures: Weighted percentage of participants with over 12 months abstinence by follow-up 2. Results: Of a total of 13 604 participants who smoked cigarettes at baseline, 9.4% (95% CI, 8.7%-10.0%) recently had quit smoking (mean age, 41.9; 95% CI, 39.7-46.6 years; 641 [43.2%] women) Of these, 22.8% (95% CI, 19.7%-26.0%) had switched to e-cigarettes, with 17.6% (95% CI, 14.8%-20.5%) using them daily. A total of 37.1% (95% CI, 33.7%-40.4%) used a noncigarette tobacco product and 62.9% (95% CI, 59.6%-66.3%) were tobacco free. Rates of switching to e-cigarettes were highest for those who were in the top tertile of tobacco dependence (31.3%; 95% CI, 25.0%-37.7%), were non-Hispanic White (26.4%; 95% CI, 22.3%-30.4%), and had higher incomes (annual income ≥$35 000, 27.5%; 95% CI, 22.5%-32.4% vs <$35 000, 19.3%; 95% CI, 16.3%-22.3%). At follow-up 2, unadjusted relapse rates were similar among those who switched to different tobacco products (for any tobacco product: successfully quit, 41.5%; 95% CI, 36.2%-46.9%; relapsed with significant requit, 17.0%; 95% CI, 12.4%-21.6%; currently smoking, 36.2%; 95% CI, 30.9%-41.4%). Controlled for potential confounders, switching to any tobacco product was associated with higher relapse rate than being tobacco free (adjusted risk difference, 8.5%; 95% CI, 0.3%-16.6%). Estimates for those who switched to e-cigarettes, whether daily or not, were not significant. While individuals who switched from cigarettes to e-cigarettes were more likely to relapse, they appeared more likely to requit and be abstinent for 3 months at follow-up 2 (17.0%; 95% CI, 12.4%-21.6% vs 10.4%; 95% CI, 8.0%-12.9%). Conclusions and Relevance: This large US nationally representative study does not support the hypothesis that switching to e-cigarettes will prevent relapse to cigarette smoking.


Asunto(s)
Fumar Cigarrillos/psicología , Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina/estadística & datos numéricos , Recurrencia , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Fumar Cigarrillos/epidemiología , Fumar Cigarrillos/prevención & control , Estudios de Cohortes , Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/psicología , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Uso de Tabaco/epidemiología , Uso de Tabaco/prevención & control , Uso de Tabaco/psicología , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/normas , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos
13.
Lancet Public Health ; 6(11): e795-e804, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34537108

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Internationally, smoking prevalence among people in prison custody (ie, people on remand awaiting trial, awaiting sentencing, or serving a custodial sentence) is high. In Scotland, all prisons implemented a comprehensive smoke-free policy in 2018 after a 16-month anticipatory period. In this study, we aimed to use data on medication dispensing to assess the impact of this policy on cessation support, health outcomes, and potential unintended consequences among people in prison custody. METHODS: We did an interrupted time-series analysis using dispensing data for 44 660 individuals incarcerated in 14 closed prisons in Scotland between March 30, 2014, and Nov 30, 2019. We estimated changes in dispensing rates associated with the policy announcement (July 17, 2017) and full implementation (Nov 30, 2018) using seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average models. Medication categories of primary interest were treatments for nicotine dependence (as an indicator of smoking cessation or abstinence attempts), acute smoking-associated illnesses, and mental health (antidepressants). We included antiepileptic medications as a negative control. FINDINGS: A 44% step increase in dispensing of treatments for nicotine dependence was observed at implementation (2250 items per 1000 people in custody per fortnight, 95% CI 1875 to 2624) due primarily to a 42% increase in dispensing of nicotine replacement therapy (2109 items per 1000 people in custody per fortnight, 1701 to 2516). A 9% step decrease in dispensing for smoking-related illnesses was observed at implementation, largely accounted for by respiratory medications (-646 items per 1000 people in custody per fortnight, -1111 to -181). No changes associated with announcement or implementation were observed for mental health dispensing or antiepileptic medications (control). INTERPRETATION: Smoke-free prison policies might improve respiratory health among people in custody and encourage smoking abstinence or cessation without apparent short-term adverse effects on mental health dispensing. FUNDING: National Institute of Health Research Public Health Research programme, Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office, and UK Medical Research Council.


Asunto(s)
Prisiones/organización & administración , Política para Fumadores , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Política Organizacional , Escocia/epidemiología , Fumar/epidemiología , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos
14.
Adv Respir Med ; 89(4): 392-402, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34269407

RESUMEN

The use of electronic cigarettes has dynamically increased over the last few years. Meanwhile, the knowledge regarding their safety has been rapidly changing, which could be a challenge for a medical practitioner. The purpose of this review is to summarize the latest reports and to verify statements on e-cigarettes' influence on health, including in the context of the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Awareness of the benefits of e-cigarettes can provide vital support for doctors caring for patients who smoke tra-ditional cigarettes. Nevertheless, attention should be paid to the dangers of the medically unjustified use of electronic cigarettes. Despite the idea of releasing e-cigarettes into the market as a harmless alternative to traditional cigarettes, this product also has a negative impact on health. Replacing traditional cigarettes with e-cigarettes provides well-documented benefits to patients with certain indications such as hypertension and asthma, as well as to smokers who intend to minimize the negative effects of passive smoking on their environment. Moreover, it could be valuable for patients who are willing to permanently overcome a nicotine addiction, especially when previous attempts to quit smoking with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) monotherapy were unsuccessful. Electronic cigarettes are a rapidly developing technology and an innovative form of a well-known addiction, so it is essential for practitioners to stay informed.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina/estadística & datos numéricos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Polonia , Fumar/epidemiología , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar
15.
AIDS Educ Prev ; 33(2): 158-168, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33821680

RESUMEN

Cigarette smoking remains disproportionately prevalent and is increasingly a cause of death and disability among people with HIV (PWH). Many PWH are interested in quitting, but interest in and uptake of first-line smoking cessation pharmacotherapies are varied in this population. To provide current data regarding experiences with and perceptions of smoking cessation and cessation aids among PWH living in Durham, North Carolina, the authors conducted five focus group interviews (total n = 24; 96% African American) using semistructured interviews. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, coded, and thematically analyzed. Major themes included ambivalence and/or lack of interest in cessation; presence of cessation barriers; perceived perceptions of ineffectiveness of cessation aids; perceived medication side effects; and conflation of the harms resulting from use of tobacco products and nicotine replacement therapy. Innovative and effective interventions must account for the aforementioned multiple barriers to cessation as well as prior experiences with and misperceptions regarding cessation aids.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Fumadores/psicología , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/psicología , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano , Anciano , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina , Investigación Cualitativa , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos
16.
Public Health Rep ; 136(6): 736-744, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33601983

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Studies examining the use of smoking cessation treatment and related spending among enrollees with employer-sponsored health insurance are dated and limited in scope. We assessed changes in annual receipt of and spending on cessation medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) among tobacco users with employer-sponsored health insurance from 2010 to 2017. METHODS: We analyzed data on 439 865 adult tobacco users in 2010 and 344 567 adult tobacco users in 2017 from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Database. We used a negative binomial regression to estimate changes in receipt of cessation medication (number of fills and refills and days of supply). We used a generalized linear model to estimate spending (total, employers', and out of pocket). In both models, covariates included year, age, sex, residence, and type of health insurance plan. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2017, the percentage of adult tobacco users with employer-sponsored health insurance who received any cessation medication increased by 2.4%, from 15.7% to 16.1% (P < .001). Annual average number of fills and refills per user increased by 15.1%, from 2.5 to 2.9 (P < .001) and days of supply increased by 26.4%, from 81.9 to 103.5 (P < .001). The total annual average spending per user increased by 53.6%, from $286.40 to $440.00 (P < .001). Annual average out-of-pocket spending per user decreased by 70.9%, from $70.80 to $20.60 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Use of smoking cessation medications is low among smokers covered by employer-sponsored health insurance. Opportunities exist to further increase the use of cessation medications by promoting the use of evidence-based cessation treatments and reducing barriers to coverage, including out-of-pocket costs.


Asunto(s)
Costos de Salud para el Patrón/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/economía , Adulto , Costos de Salud para el Patrón/tendencias , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/normas , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/economía , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
17.
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev ; 10(3): 241-250, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33502815

RESUMEN

Novel noncombustible tobacco products offer adult smokers (ASs) alternatives to combustible cigarettes lower on the continuum of risk; however, the abuse potential of such products has not been well studied. The objective of this study was to evaluate the abuse potential of 2 chewable tobacco-derived nicotine containing products, VERVE Chews Blue Mint (test 1) and Green Mint (test 2), in ASs compared with own-brand cigarettes (CIGS) and nicotine polacrilex gum (GUM) using subjective measures and nicotine pharmacokinetics. ASs used the test products during a 5-day at-home trial prior to completing an in-clinic 4-period randomized crossover study. During the study ASs used test products, CIGS, and GUM once on separate days. Responses to Tobacco/Nicotine Withdrawal and Direct Effects of Product questionnaires were documented, and blood samples were collected to assess nicotine pharmacokinetics during each product use. Nicotine pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax and AUC) were statistically significantly lower with use of test products compared with CIGS and statistically significantly higher compared with GUM. No appreciable differences were noted between the 2 flavors for any of the end points measured. Reductions in maximum urge to smoke and maximum responses to the question "Is the Product 'Pleasant' Right Now?" for the test products were statistically significantly lower than CIGS but comparable to GUM. Similar results were observed for responses to other items in the 2 questionnaires. The test products, under the conditions of this study, carry lower abuse potential than own-brand cigarettes and similar to nicotine polacrilex gum.


Asunto(s)
Nicotina/farmacocinética , Fumadores/psicología , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/psicología , Productos de Tabaco/efectos adversos , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/efectos adversos , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Goma de Mascar/efectos adversos , Goma de Mascar/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Cruzados , Femenino , Aromatizantes , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nicotina/sangre , Nicotina/química , Fumadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Detección de Abuso de Sustancias/métodos , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Productos de Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Cese del Uso de Tabaco/métodos , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos
18.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 23(1): 219-226, 2021 01 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31711234

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to examine access, engagement, and quitting behaviors of American Indian/Alaska Native (AIAN) callers to the California Smokers' Helpline. Telephone counseling is the primary function of the quitline. The overarching theoretical framework for California's quitline is social cognitive theory, although it also utilizes motivational interviewing and cognitive-behavioral strategies. AIMS AND METHODS: AIAN (n = 16 089) and White (n = 173 425) California quitline callers from 2009 to 2018 were compared on their characteristics, engagement, and quitting behaviors. Quitline callers responded to a telephone survey at intake. A random selection was called for evaluation 7 months later (White n = 8194, AIAN n = 764). Data from the 2009 to 2017 California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) were used as a reference point for AIANs (AIAN n = 1373). RESULTS: The quitline and CHIS had similar proportions of AIANs (4.6% vs. 4.3%, respectively). AIAN smokers were more likely than White smokers to report physical (53.6% vs. 44.9%) and mental (65.7% vs. 57.8%) health conditions at intake. AIANs were more likely to participate in counseling than White callers (67.1% vs. 65.7%). Among those who received counseling, AIANs had greater odds than White smokers of making a quit attempt (adjusted odds ratio = 1.39 [1.06, 1.81]) and similar odds of quitting for 180 days (adjusted odds ratio = 0.95 [0.69, 1.31]). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of access, engagement, and quitting suggest that individualized quitline counseling was as effective with AIANs as it was with White smokers. Increasing efforts to refer AIANs to existing state quitlines can help more smokers quit. IMPLICATIONS: This study showed that AIAN smokers were well represented among California quitline callers, even without a targeted campaign. It also found that AIAN smokers engaged in quitline services and were as able to quit as their White counterparts were, even after adjusting for other baseline characteristics. One implication is that public health programs can promote quitlines using broad-based campaigns knowing that they will still motivate AIAN smokers to seek help. Another implication is that a standard, individualized counseling protocol delivered by culturally competent quitline staff can effectively help AIAN smokers to quit.


Asunto(s)
/estadística & datos numéricos , Indio Americano o Nativo de Alaska/estadística & datos numéricos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Líneas Directas/estadística & datos numéricos , Fumadores/psicología , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Fumar/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , California/epidemiología , Consejo/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Motivación , Distribución Aleatoria , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/psicología , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Indio Americano o Nativo de Alaska/psicología
19.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 23(1): 99-106, 2021 01 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31993637

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Financial incentives effectively increase smoking cessation rates, but it is unclear via which psychological mechanisms incentives influence quit behavior. The current study examines how receiving financial incentives for smoking cessation leads to quitting smoking and investigates several mediators and moderators of that relationship. AIMS AND METHODS: The study sample consisted of 604 tobacco-smoking employees from 61 companies in the Netherlands who completed a baseline and follow-up questionnaire. The current study is a secondary analysis from a cluster randomized trial where employees received smoking cessation group counseling at the workplace. Participants in the intervention group additionally received financial incentives of €350 in total for 12-month continuous smoking abstinence. We used a two-level path analysis to test a model that assesses the effects of financial incentives through smoking cessation program evaluation, medication use, nicotine replacement use, attitudes, self-efficacy, and social influences on quit success. We additionally tested whether an individual's reward responsiveness moderated the influence of incentives on quit success. RESULTS: The effect of financial incentives on quit success was mediated by a higher self-efficacy. Financial incentives were also associated with a higher use of cessation medication. A more positive program evaluation was related to higher self-efficacy, more social influence to quit, and more positive attitudes about quitting. The results did not differ significantly by individual reward responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study suggest that financial incentives may be used to increase medication use and self-efficacy for quitting smoking, which offers an indirect way to increase successful smoking cessation. IMPLICATIONS: (1) This is the first study investigating via which psychological pathways financial incentives for quitting smoking can lead to long-term quit success. (2) The results showed a path between financial incentives and a higher likelihood of medication use. Incentives may encourage smokers to use medication in order to increase their chance of quitting smoking and receive the reward. (3) There was a path from financial incentives to quit success via a higher self-efficacy. (4) The effects of financial incentives did not depend on individual reward responsiveness.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Conductista/economía , Motivación , Fumadores/psicología , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/economía , Fumar/terapia , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia Conductista/métodos , Femenino , Promoción de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Fumar/epidemiología , Fumar/psicología , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/psicología , Lugar de Trabajo
20.
Addiction ; 116(5): 1233-1244, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33089562

RESUMEN

AIM: To examine changes in smoking, drinking and quitting/reduction behaviour following the COVID-19 lockdown in England. DESIGN/SETTING: Monthly cross-sectional surveys representative of the adult population in England, aggregated before (April 2019-February 2020) versus after (April 2020) lockdown. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 20 558 adults (≥ 16 years). MEASUREMENTS: The independent variable was the timing of the COVID-19 lockdown (before versus after March 2020). Dependent variables were: prevalence of smoking and high-risk drinking, past-year cessation and quit attempts (among past-year smokers), past-year attempts to reduce alcohol consumption (among high-risk drinkers) and use of evidence-based (e.g. prescription medication/face-to-face behavioural support) and remote support [telephone support/websites/applications (apps)] for smoking cessation and alcohol reduction (among smokers/high-risk drinkers who made a quit/reduction attempt). Covariates included age, sex, social grade, region and level of nicotine and alcohol dependence (as relevant). FINDINGS: The COVID-19 lockdown was not associated with a significant change in smoking prevalence [17.0% (after) versus 15.9% (before), odds ratio (OR) = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.95-1.24], but was associated with increases in quit attempts [39.6 versus 29.1%, adjusted odds ratio (ORadj ) = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.23-1.98], quit success (21.3 versus 13.9%, ORadj  = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.22-3.33) and cessation (8.8 versus 4.1%, ORadj  = 2.63, 95% CI = 1.69-4.09) among past-year smokers. Among smokers who tried to quit, there was no significant change in use of evidence-based support (50.0 versus 51.5%, ORadj  = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.72-1.68) but use of remote support increased (10.9 versus 2.7%, ORadj  = 3.59, 95% CI = 1.56-8.23). Lockdown was associated with increases in high-risk drinking (38.3 versus 25.1%, OR = 1.85, CI = 1.67-2.06), but also alcohol reduction attempts by high-risk drinkers (28.5 versus 15.3%, ORadj  = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.77-2.64). Among high-risk drinkers who made a reduction attempt, use of evidence-based support decreased (1.2 versus 4.0%, ORadj  = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.05-0.97) and there was no significant change in use of remote support (6.9 versus 6.1%, ORadj  = 1.32, 95% CI = 0.64-2.75). CONCLUSIONS: Following the March 2020 COVID-19 lockdown, smokers and high-risk drinkers in England were more likely than before lockdown to report trying to quit smoking or reduce alcohol consumption and rates of smoking cessation and use of remote cessation support were higher. However, high-risk drinking prevalence increased post-lockdown and use of evidence-based support for alcohol reduction by high-risk drinkers decreased with no compensatory increase in use of remote support.


Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , COVID-19 , Cuarentena/estadística & datos numéricos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Fumar/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina/estadística & datos numéricos , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , SARS-CoV-2 , Fumadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA