Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 809
Filtrar
1.
Chiropr Man Therap ; 32(1): 14, 2024 May 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720355

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of children and adolescents experience back pain. However, a comprehensive systematic review on the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate benefits and harms of rehabilitation interventions for non-specific low back pain (LBP) or thoracic spine pain in the pediatric population. METHODS: Seven bibliographic electronic databases were searched from inception to June 16, 2023. Moreover, reference lists of relevant studies and systematic reviews, three targeted websites, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched. Paired reviewers independently conducted screening, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data related to study characteristics, methodology, subjects, and results. Certainty of evidence was evaluated based on the GRADE approach. RESULTS: We screened 8461 citations and 307 full-text articles. Ten quantitative studies (i.e., 8 RCTs, 2 non-randomized clinical trials) and one qualitative study were included. With very low to moderate certainty evidence, in adolescents with LBP, spinal manipulation (1-2 sessions/week over 12 weeks, 1 RCT) plus exercise may be associated with a greater likelihood of experiencing clinically important pain reduction versus exercise alone; and group-based exercise over 8 weeks (2 RCTs and 1 non-randomized trial) may reduce pain intensity. The qualitative study found information provided via education/advice and compliance of treatment were related to effective treatment. No economic studies or studies examining thoracic spine pain were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal manipulation and group-based exercise may be beneficial in reducing LBP intensity in adolescents. Education should be provided as part of a care program. The overall evidence is sparse. Methodologically rigorous studies are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42019135009 (PROSPERO).


Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Humanos , Niño , Adolescente , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/rehabilitación , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Manipulación Espinal/métodos , Dolor de Espalda/rehabilitación , Dolor de Espalda/terapia
2.
J Bodyw Mov Ther ; 38: 289-298, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38763572

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of Eutony, Holistic Gymnastics, and Pilates on hamstring flexibility and back pain in pre-adolescent girls. METHODS: This randomized prospective quantitative clinical trial compared the effects of Eutony, Holistic Gymnastics, and Pilates on hamstring flexibility and back pain. The sample consisted of 80 pre-adolescent girls aged 10-13 years and divided into three groups: Eutony, with 26 girls; Holistic Gymnastics, 27 girls; and Pilates, 27 girls. The participants underwent ten 1-h weekly interventions. Hamstring flexibility was evaluated using fingertip-to-floor, sit-and-reach, and hip angle tests; back pain was evaluated using the Body Posture Evaluation Instrument questionnaire and the way they carried their backpack by the Layout for Assessing Dynamic Posture. Descriptive statistical analysis, analysis of variance, and Kruskal-Wallis test were performed at a 5 % significance level (p < 0.05). RESULTS: The three body practices increased hamstring flexibility in all fingertip-to-floor (7.77 cm), hip angle (5.58°), and sit-and-reach evaluations (9.07 cm). Before the intervention, 66.25 % of participants complained of back pain. After the intervention, only 37.50 % continued with the complaint. Moreover, 25 % of pre-adolescent girls started to carry their school backpack correctly. CONCLUSION: Eutony, Holistic Gymnastics, and Pilates increased hamstring flexibility, reduced back pain complaints, and incentivized the girls to carry the school backpack correctly. REGISTRY OF CLINICAL TRIALS: Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials ReBEC (RBR-25w6kk).


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Ejercicio con Movimientos , Gimnasia , Músculos Isquiosurales , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Humanos , Femenino , Niño , Gimnasia/fisiología , Músculos Isquiosurales/fisiología , Adolescente , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Técnicas de Ejercicio con Movimientos/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Dolor de Espalda/rehabilitación
3.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil ; 37(3): 585-598, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38217578

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines stress the importance of prevention and treatment of non-specific back pain through exercise therapy. However, it has not yet been confirmed whether the combination of exercise plus education is more effective than such interventions taken separately. OBJECTIVE: To determine if the combination of exercise plus education is more effective for the prevention of non-specific back pain than exercise or education alone. METHOD: A systematic search of studies whose sample consisted of participants without non-specific back pain (primary prevention) and participants with non-specific back pain (secondary and tertiary prevention) was conducted in the following databases in March 2023: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Medline. RESULTS: A total of 16 articles were selected. Statistically significant results were found in the pain variable with SMD =-2.02 (95% CI =-2.71 to -1.33; p< 0.001), the disability variable with SMD =-1.14 (95% CI =-1.63 to -0.65; p< 0.001), and the kinesiophobia variable with SMD =-1.8 (95% CI =-2.54 to -1.05; p< 0.001). CONCLUSION: Interventions that combine exercise and education seem to have a greater preventive effect on non-specific back pain, disability and kinesiophobia than those that include exercise or education in an isolated manner.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de Espalda , Terapia por Ejercicio , Humanos , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Dolor de Espalda/prevención & control , Dolor de Espalda/rehabilitación , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Educación del Paciente como Asunto
4.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil ; 37(4): 929-941, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38217575

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vertebral fragility fractures (VFFs) commonly result from low bone mass and microarchitecture deterioration of bone tissue. spinal orthoses are common non-pharmacological options for managing vertebral fracture pain. However, the effects of spinal orthoses on pain, physical functioning, and quality of life (QoL) are still debated. OBJECTIVE: This survey aimed to investigate the patients-reported outcomes of a dynamic spinal orthosis prescribed in the routine clinical practice of VFFs management. METHODS: This multi-center national-wide prospective cohort study assessed older patients (aged > 60 years) diagnosed with acute VFFs and prescribed with a dynamic spinal orthosis (Spinfast®). A survey questionnaire was realized and included sections on patient characterization, osteoporosis characterization, spinal orthosis, clinical outcomes, pain medications, and osteoporosis medications. The questionnaire was administered at baseline and after three months. A total of 68 patients completed the questionnaire at three months. Most patients had one or two VFFs and were treated with pain medications and osteoporosis medications. Compliance and tolerability of the spinal orthosis were assessed, and clinical outcomes such as pain intensity, physical functioning, and QoL were measured. RESULTS: The results showed no significant differences in outcomes between age subgroups. Italian physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians were commonly involved in the management of VFFs patients. Sixty-six patients completed the questionnaire. The results showed that pain intensity, physical functioning and QoL improved after three months of spinal orthosis wearing (p< 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The correct management of VFFs is mandatory to improve pain and reduce disability, and our findings suggested a positive role of dynamic spinal orthosis to improve the comprehensive management of VFFs patients. However, high-quality research trials are warranted to provide clear recommendations for the correct clinical management of VFF.


Asunto(s)
Aparatos Ortopédicos , Fracturas Osteoporóticas , Calidad de Vida , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/rehabilitación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/rehabilitación , Dolor de Espalda/rehabilitación , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Autoinforme , Dimensión del Dolor , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente
5.
J Rehabil Med ; 54: jrm00274, 2022 Mar 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35019995

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Longitudinal studies on barriers to applying for rehabilitation in Germany are lacking in light of the suspected underutilization of rehabilitation services. The aim of this study was to examine application behaviour in persons with disabling back pain and to identify relevant predictors for making an application. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study with randomized sampling of insurants in the German Pension Insurance, using a questionnaire at baseline and follow-up with linked administrative data for 1.5 years. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: Employed persons (age range 45-59 years) with a high degree of limitations due to back pain and a self-reported risk of permanent work disability (not applied for disability pension, no medical rehabilitation within the last 4 years). METHODS: Multivariable Cox regression was used to examine the influence of pre-selected variables on making an application in the follow-up period. RESULTS: Of 690 persons, only 12% applied for rehabilitation. Predictors for making an application were: support from physicians (hazard ratio (HR)=2.24; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.32-3.80), family, and friends (HR=1.67; 95% CI 1.02-2.73), more pain-related disability days (HR=1.02; 95% CI 1.01-1.03), and worse work ability (HR=0.86; 95% CI 0.75-0.97). An intention to apply at baseline mediated the effect of family and physician support on the application. CONCLUSION: The low number of applications for rehabilitation despite disabling back pain indicates access barriers to, and underuse of, medical rehabilitation.


Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad , Pensiones , Dolor de Espalda/rehabilitación , Personas con Discapacidad/rehabilitación , Alemania , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
6.
Disabil Rehabil ; 44(23): 7039-7047, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34560829

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Evidence for health-related effects of German medical rehabilitation programs for back pain is inconclusive. This cohort study aimed to examine the effectiveness of medical rehabilitation in residents with back pain (German Clinical Trial Register: DRKS00011554). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A sample of 45 000 people aged 45-59 years was randomly drawn from two pension agencies. We used propensity score matching to compare persons with back pain who completed a medical rehabilitation program with similar untreated subjects. Questionnaire data were assessed in 2017 and 2019, and linked with administrative data. The primary outcome was pain disability. RESULTS: In total, 6610 persons with back pain were considered for matching and we finally compared 200 persons treated in a medical rehabilitation program with 200 untreated subjects. Pain disability was reported more favorable in the control group without medical rehabilitation compared to the intervention group (difference = 4.2; 95% CI -0.8-9.2), as well as other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: At first glance, the findings suggest that medical rehabilitation was ineffective in improving health, pain and work ability among employed persons with back pain, but we found plausible explanations indicating that the estimated effects in favor of the untreated subjects are methodologically induced.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONPropensity score matching can be used to assess the effects of multimodal interventions in persons with back pain in routine care.Inappropriate recruitment of controls may underestimate treatment effects.When using observational data and propensity score matching to analyze the effectiveness of medical rehabilitation, baseline survey should be conducted directly before the start of rehabilitation to identify comparable controls.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de Espalda , Personas con Discapacidad , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Dolor de Espalda/rehabilitación , Pensiones , Personas con Discapacidad/rehabilitación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
J Pain ; 23(2): 175-195, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34425250

RESUMEN

This systematic review aimed to synthesize the existing evidence of extended reality (XR) on pain and motor function outcomes in patients with back pain. Following the Cochrane guidelines, relevant articles of any language were selected by 2 independent reviewers from CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, Medline and Web of Knowledge databases. Of 2,050 unique citations, 24 articles were included in our review. These studies included a total of 900 back pain patients. Despite broader XR search, all interventions were virtual reality (VR) based and involved physical exercises (n = 17, 71%), hippotherapy (n = 4, 17%), motor imagery (n = 1, 4%), distraction (n = 1, 4%), and cognitive-behavior therapy (n = 1, 4%). Sixteen controlled studies were included in a meta-analysis which suggested that VR provides a significant improvement in terms of back pain intensity over control interventions (Mean Difference: -0.67; 95% CI: -1.12 to -0.23; I2 = 85%). Almost all included studies presented high risk of bias, highlighting the need to improve methodology in the examination of VR interventions. While the specific set of studies showed high heterogeneity across several methodological factors, a tentative conclusion could be drawn that VR was effective improving back pain intensity and tends to have a positive effect on improving other pain outcomes and motion function. PERSPECTIVE: Extended reality technologies have appeared as interesting nonpharmacological options for the treatment of back pain, with the potential to minimise the need for opioid medications. Our systematic review summarised existing applications of extended reality for back pain and proposed a few recommendations to direct further studies in the field.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de Espalda/rehabilitación , Terapía Asistida por Caballos , Terapia por Ejercicio , Manejo del Dolor , Psicoterapia , Realidad Virtual , Humanos
8.
Ann Agric Environ Med ; 28(1): 179-182, 2021 Mar 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33775085

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Back pain is now a very common phenomenon. It is caused by various pathologies in the area of the motor unit of the spine. These changes can cause pressure on the nerve structures within the spinal canal, resulting in various ailments. Pain is the most common symptom. In most cases, patients are qualified for conservative management. In the case of neurological deficits, the patient is qualified for spinal surgery. Unfortunately, surgical treatment is not always 100% effective therapy method. Moreover, many external factors, such as smoking for instance, can affect the process of tissue healing and decide on the time of recovery. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the impact of smoking on back pain intensity in rehabilitated patients with discopathy treated conservatively and surgically. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 41 patients after surgical treatment (9 smokers) and 96 patients (20 smokers) undergoing conservative therapy for back pain due to discopathy. All patients underwent a multidirectional rehabilitation programme at the Department of Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine of the Medical University in Lódz. RESULTS: The Laitinen scale was used to assess the patients' pain. Rehabilitation of patients with back pain due to discopathy had a significant analgesic effect (p <0.0001). Furthermore, there was observed a statistically significant effect of smoking on the level of pain intensity on the Laitinen scale in the group of patients who underwent surgery (p <0.0469). The smokers operated on had significantly worse results. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Complex rehabilitation of patients with back syndrome pain due to discopathy demonstrated significant analgesic effectiveness. 2) Smoking significantly worsens the results of the therapy in patients who underwent surgery.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Dolor de Espalda/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor de Espalda/cirugía , Fumar/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dolor de Espalda/fisiopatología , Dolor de Espalda/rehabilitación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cicatrización de Heridas , Adulto Joven
9.
J Rehabil Med ; 52(11): jrm00125, 2020 Nov 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33191436

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the association between self-reported prognosis of employability and health-related measures, and to clarify which determinants influence the intention to apply for medical rehabil-itation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of a random sample of German employees. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 6,654 participants (58% female) aged 45-59 years with back pain during the last 3 months. RESULTS: Out of a total of 6,654 persons, 4,838 had a positive self-reported prognosis of employability. Persons with positive and negative prognoses clearly differ with regard to health-related measures. Of 1,816 persons who reported a negative prognosis, 26% stated an intention to apply for rehabilitation. Intention was determined mainly by perceived social support from family and friends (odds ratio (OR) 1.87; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.66-2.10), as well as physicians and therapists (OR 1.64; 95% CI 1.41-1.90). CONCLUSION: A negative self-reported prognosis of employability is associated with self-reported health restrictions that may determine the need for rehabilitation interventions. A considerable proportion of persons with self-reported health restrictions do not plan to use medical rehabilitation. Perceived social support is an important facilitator of intention to apply for rehabilitation. However, this study needs to be replicated in other populations combining self-reported and administrative data.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de Espalda/rehabilitación , Empleo/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Intención , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
10.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil ; 99(12): 1079-1085, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32969967

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the implementation and patient satisfaction of telemedicine visits in a physical medicine and rehabilitation spine practice during COVID-19. DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study. RESULTS: Of 172 patients, 97.6% were very satisfied or satisfied (83.7% of the patients were very satisfied) with their telemedicine appointment. In 44.4% of the cases, the physical medicine and rehabilitation physician prescribed medication to the patient, and in 21.6% of the cases, either an injection or radiofrequency ablation was ordered. Most patients (87%) did not have any issues during their encounter. Lastly, 64.5% of the patients preferred telemedicine over in-person appointments, whereas 56.1% of the patients who are 60 yrs and older responded the same. A total of 67.4% of those who had a follow-up visit would choose telemedicine over in-person. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that telemedicine can provide very effective and satisfactory care in a physical medicine and rehabilitation spine practice. This was especially notable with follow-up visits where imaging and treatment plan can easily be discussed over telemedicine. Stay-at-home orders and improved reimbursement during the COVID-19 pandemic have spurred adoption of telemedicine with high patient satisfaction. We hope that physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians will be able to continue expanding patient access in the postpandemic world.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Medicina Física y Rehabilitación/tendencias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Telemedicina , Anciano , Dolor de Espalda/rehabilitación , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
11.
Rehabilitation (Stuttg) ; 59(5): 273-281, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32869247

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Back pain is associated with significant impairments of participation, which should be prevented by medical rehabilitation programs. The existing evidence shows that the German rehabilitation model is not effective for all target groups. In addition to intensified measures for patients with a high risk of failed return to work, a less intense rehabilitation form could be useful for patients with moderate disabilities. Therefore, in this study the feasibility of a part-time medical rehabilitation (German abbreviation: BbR) was examined. The BbR was designed as a closed group program with a therapy duration of 48 hours (2 appointments per week over 12 weeks). Furthermore, different access paths to BbR as well as the effects were focused. METHODS: Twelve groups with 6 to 12 participants each were planned in 3 outpatient rehabilitation centers. In addition to the regular application process, insured persons were recruited via the network of rehabilitation centers as well as the company service of the German Pension Insurance. The BbR focused on employed patients who were not on sick-leave and had the need for rehabilitation due to back pain. The evaluation was multi-perspective and multi-methodical. All participants completed questionnaires at admission, while and at discharge of the BbR. In addition, discussions in groups were conducted with representatives of the rehabilitation centers, the pension insurance and employers. RESULTS: In total, 7 groups with 56 participants could be realized in 2 rehabilitation centers. The typical BbR-participant was female, married, without children, 48 years old and working full for medium-sizes enterprise without shift work. The majority had no or minor no time of sick-leave in the year prior to rehabilitation. 59% of them were recruited by the rehabilitation centers; only few persons were assigned by the pension insurance. Two thirds would not have applied for a medical rehabilitation without the offer of BbR. Overall, the participants were very satisfied with the BbR. However, the compatibility of the BbR with the job and everyday life was perceived as a challenge. A pre-post comparison showed moderate to strong differences in self-rated health, pain, functional status and work ability. CONCLUSION: The BbR seems to be a useful additional concept in the German rehabilitation system for patients with moderate disabilities. Before dissemination, the identified challenges should be solved. This applies in particular to the recruitment and compatibility of rehabilitation with work and everyday life.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de Espalda/rehabilitación , Centros de Rehabilitación/organización & administración , Reinserción al Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Trabajo , Adulto , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Factores de Tiempo
12.
Eur J Clin Invest ; 50(12): e13352, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32683694

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effects of exercise programmes on pain, function and disease activity in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, CNKI and Wanfang from inception to February 2020. Randomized controlled trials comparing exercises with nonexercise interventions in AS patients were applied. Studies that assessed the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were included. Outcomes of home-based exercise intervention were also reported independently. RESULTS: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria in all, including 534 patients (278 exercise, 256 control). Compared with the nonexercise group, exercise group had statistically significant improvements in pain (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -1.02 [95% CI: -1.50 to -0.55]) (I2 : 31%, P <.0001), BASDAI (WMD: -0.85 [95% CI: -1.09 to -0.61]) (I2 : 20%, P <.00001), and BASFI (WMD: -0.66 [95% CI: -0.95 to -0.38]) (I2 : 0%, P <.00001), but not in CRP and ESR. What's more, home-based exercise programmes had positive impacts on BASFI, BASDAI and pain. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with AS, exercise programmes improve pain, function and disease activity. To confirm the results, more well-designed randomized controlled trials with large number of patients are required.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de Espalda/rehabilitación , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Espondilitis Anquilosante/rehabilitación , Dolor de Espalda/fisiopatología , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Espondilitis Anquilosante/fisiopatología
13.
Physiother Res Int ; 25(4): e1864, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32598090

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare two physiotherapy interventions following lumber disc surgery regarding effect on pain, functioning and fear of movement. METHODS: This study is a prospective randomized controlled study. When admitted to hospital for first time lumbar disc surgery, the participants were randomized to one of two post-operative intervention groups: one group received information only and the other exercise in combination with information. Outcomes were collected at baseline, 6-8 weeks and 12-months post-surgery. The primary outcome was to record changes in back/hip pain and leg pain. Secondary outcomes were evaluation of changes in function, fear-avoidance beliefs and kinesiophobia. RESULTS: Seventy patients completed the study and were included in the analysis, of which 37 were randomized to the group receiving information only and the remaining 33 receiving both exercise and information. For primary outcomes, at 12 months postoperatively, the group receiving both exercise and information had significantly lower leg pain compared with those receiving only information (p < .033). For secondary outcomes, at 12 months postoperatively, a significant difference (p < .027) was detected for function, which favoured those that received both exercise and information. There was no significant difference in the results for the other secondary outcomes. Both groups showed clinically important changes in relation to pain and function from baseline to 12 months. The effect of treatment showed a statistically significant difference in favour of exercise and information, but the difference was not clinically relevant. CONCLUSION: Exercise in combination with information reduced leg pain and improved function, which was statistically more evident over a period of time. Postoperative physiotherapy after lumbar disc surgery could include exercises in addition to information, but perhaps not for all patients, as both groups improved, and the difference between the two groups was not clinically relevant.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/rehabilitación , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Adulto , Dolor de Espalda/rehabilitación , Ejercicio Físico , Miedo/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Prospectivos
14.
JAMA Psychiatry ; 77(10): 1001-1011, 2020 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32459348

RESUMEN

Importance: Depression is a frequent comorbid condition in patients with persistent back pain and is associated with substantial adverse consequences, including the risk of developing opioid use disorders. Shifting the focus from depression treatment to preventing depression might be a viable way to reduce the disease burden. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a web-based self-help intervention to reduce the incidence of major depressive episode (MDE) in patients with persistent back pain. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prevention of Depression in Back Pain Patients (PROD-BP) was a pragmatic, observer-blinded randomized clinical trial with a parallel design conducted in Germany. Eligible adults with a diagnosis of persistent back pain and subclinical depressive symptoms, but who were depression free, were recruited either on-site or after discharge from 82 orthopedic clinics between October 1, 2015, and July 31, 2017. All analyses were conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle from October 31, 2018, to April 30, 2019. Interventions: The intervention group received an e-coach-guided, web-based self-help intervention that was based on cognitive behavioral therapy and tailored to the needs of patients with persistent back pain. The intervention included 6 obligatory modules and 3 optional modules to be completed by participants as well as feedback from e-coaches. Both the intervention and control groups had unrestricted access to treatment as usual. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was time to onset of an MDE over a 12-month period as assessed by blinded diagnostic raters using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5. Secondary outcomes included depression severity, quality of life, pain intensity, pain-related disability, pain self-efficacy, work capacity, and user satisfaction assessed with a variety of instruments. Results: A total of 295 participants (mean [SD] age, 52.8 [7.7] years; 184 women [62.4%]) were recruited and randomized to either the intervention group (n = 149) or control group (n = 146). The intervention reduced the risk of MDE onset by 52% (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.28-0.81; P < .001). Twenty-one participants (14.1%) in the intervention group and 41 participants (28.1%) in the control group experienced an MDE over the 12-month period. The number needed to treat to prevent 1 new case of MDE was 2.84 (95% CI, 1.79-9.44). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this trial showed that among patients with persistent back pain, depression can be prevented by a guided web-based self-help intervention in addition to treatment as usual. This finding suggests that using a scalable digital approach to integrate psychological treatment into routine pain management is feasible. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register Identifier: DRKS00007960.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de Espalda/rehabilitación , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Trastorno Depresivo/prevención & control , Intervención basada en la Internet , Adulto , Anciano , Dolor de Espalda/psicología , Enfermedad Crónica , Comorbilidad , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/prevención & control , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ensayos Clínicos Pragmáticos como Asunto , Grupos de Autoayuda , Método Simple Ciego , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther ; 50(6): 319-333, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32272032

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of weight-loss interventions on pain and disability in people with knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA) and spinal pain. DESIGN: Intervention systematic review. LITERATURE SEARCH: Twelve online databases and clinical trial registries. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials of any weight-loss intervention (eg, diet, physical activity, surgical, pharmaceutical) that reported pain or disability outcomes in people with knee or hip OA or spinal pain. DATA SYNTHESIS: We calculated mean differences or standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool to assess risk of bias and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool to judge credibility of evidence. RESULTS: Twenty-two trials with 3602 participants were included. There was very low- to very low-credibility evidence for a moderate effect of weight-loss interventions on pain intensity (10 trials, n = 1806; SMD, -0.54; 95% CI: -0.86, -0.22; I2 = 87%, P<.001) and a small effect on disability (11 trials, n = 1821; SMD, -0.32; 95% CI: -0.49, -0.14; I2 = 58%, P<.001) compared to minimal care for people with OA. For knee OA, there was low- to moderate-credibility evidence that weight-loss interventions were not more effective than exercise only for pain intensity and disability, respectively (4 trials, n = 673; SMD, -0.13; 95% CI: -0.40, 0.14; I2 = 55%; 5 trials, n = 737; SMD, -0.20; 95% CI: -0.41, 0.00; I2 = 32%). CONCLUSION: Weight-loss interventions may provide small to moderate improvements in pain and disability for OA compared to minimal care. There was limited and inconclusive evidence for weight-loss interventions targeting spinal pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2020;50(6):319-333. Epub 9 Apr 2020. doi:10.2519/jospt.2020.9041.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de Espalda/rehabilitación , Dolor Crónico/rehabilitación , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/rehabilitación , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/rehabilitación , Pérdida de Peso , Dolor de Espalda/fisiopatología , Dolor de Espalda/prevención & control , Dolor Crónico/fisiopatología , Dolor Crónico/prevención & control , Dieta Reductora , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Terapia por Ejercicio , Humanos , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/fisiopatología , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/fisiopatología
16.
Scand J Prim Health Care ; 38(1): 92-100, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32000558

RESUMEN

Objective: To study the long-term effects of a workplace intervention in addition to structured physiotherapy regarding self-reported measures in patients with acute/subacute neck and/or back pain.Design: WorkUp - a cluster-randomised controlled trial in 32 primary care centers in Sweden, from January 2013 through December 2014 (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02609750).Intervention: Structured physiotherapy with the workplace dialogue 'Convergence Dialogue Meeting' (CDM), conducted by the treating physiotherapist as an add-on. Reference group received structured physiotherapy.Subjects: Adults, 18-67 years (mean 43.7, standard deviation (SD) 12.2), 65.3% women with acute/subacute neck and/or back pain who had worked ≥4 weeks past year, considered at risk of sick leave or were on short-term sick leave (≤60 days) were included (n = 352).Outcome measures: Self-reported function, functional rating index (FRI), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3L) and work ability (Work Ability Score, WAS) at 12 months follow-up.Results: The mean differences in outcomes between intervention and reference group were; -0.76 (95% confidence interval (CI): -2.39, 0.88; FRI), 0.02 (95% CI: -0.04, 0.08; EQ-5D-3L) and -0.05 (95% CI: -0.63, 0.53; WAS). From baseline to 12 months, the intervention group improved function from 46.5 (SD 19.7) to 10.5 (SD 7.3) on FRI; health-related quality of life from 0.53 (SD 0.29) to 0.74 (SD 0.20) on EQ-5D and work ability from 5.7 (SD 2.6) to 7.6 (SD 2.1) on WAS.Conclusion: Despite a clinically relevant improvement over time, there were no significant differences in improvement between groups, thus we conclude that CDM had no effect on self-reported measures in this study.Key pointsIn earlier analysis of the primary outcome (work ability measured by absenteeism) in this trial, a positive effect was found when the workplace intervention 'Convergence Dialogue Meeting' (CDM) was added to structured physiotherapy for patients with neck or back pain.By contrast, in this new analysis of secondary outcomes (self-reported function, health and perceived work ability), there was no added effect of CDM above structured physiotherapy alone, although patients in both the intervention and reference group improved over time.The addition of CDM to physiotherapy is therefore justified by its specific effect on behavior (work absence) rather than any effect on clinical outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de Espalda/rehabilitación , Dolor de Cuello/rehabilitación , Calidad de Vida , Absentismo , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Autoinforme , Resultado del Tratamiento , Lugar de Trabajo , Adulto Joven
17.
Eur Spine J ; 29(7): 1660-1670, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31916000

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To conduct a meta-analysis to describe clinical course of pain and disability in adult patients post-lumbar discectomy (PROSPERO: CRD42015020806). METHODS: Sensitive topic-based search strategy designed for individual databases was conducted. Patients (> 16 years) following first-time lumbar discectomy for sciatica/radiculopathy with no complications, investigated in inception (point of surgery) prospective cohort studies, were included. Studies including revision surgery or not published in English were excluded. Two reviewers independently searched information sources, assessed eligibility at title/abstract and full-text stages, extracted data, assessed risk of bias (modified QUIPs) and assessed GRADE. Authors were contacted to request raw data where data/variance data were missing. Meta-analyses evaluated outcomes at all available time points using the variance-weighted mean in random-effect meta-analyses. Means and 95% CIs were plotted over time for measurements reported on outcomes of leg pain, back pain and disability. RESULTS: A total of 87 studies (n = 31,034) at risk of bias (49 moderate, 38 high) were included. Clinically relevant improvements immediately following surgery (> MCID) for leg pain (0-10, mean before surgery 7.04, 50 studies, n = 14,910 participants) and disability were identified (0-100, mean before surgery 53.33, 48 studies, n = 15,037). Back pain also improved (0-10, mean before surgery 4.72, 53 studies, n = 14,877). Improvement in all outcomes was maintained (to 7 years). Meta-regression analyses to assess the relationship between outcome data and a priori potential covariates found preoperative back pain and disability predictive for outcome. CONCLUSION: Moderate-level evidence supports clinically relevant immediate improvement in leg pain and disability following lumbar discectomy with accompanying improvements in back pain. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.


Asunto(s)
Discectomía , Vértebras Lumbares , Dolor Postoperatorio , Adulto , Dolor de Espalda/etiología , Dolor de Espalda/rehabilitación , Dolor de Espalda/cirugía , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Discectomía/efectos adversos , Discectomía/métodos , Discectomía/rehabilitación , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Dolor Musculoesquelético/etiología , Dolor Musculoesquelético/rehabilitación , Dolor Musculoesquelético/cirugía , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/rehabilitación , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiculopatía/etiología , Radiculopatía/rehabilitación , Radiculopatía/cirugía , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/rehabilitación , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil ; 33(5): 801-809, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31903979

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mortality rates among immigrant patients undergoing rehabilitation for musculoskeletal backache are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To study the association between marital status, severe psychosocial strain, receiving long-term time-limited sickness allowance (TLSA) and all-cause mortality (ACM) in a cohort of immigrants aged 20-45 years with long-standing backache in Sweden. METHODS: We studied 318 patients (92% foreign-born, 76% non-European) of known marital status on sick-leave for musculoskeletal backache. They were followed up for ACM until 2015. Socio-demographic data, TLSA and psychosocial strain, including major depression, severe psychosocial stressors and pessimistic thoughts, were analysed using multiple-imputation Cox regression. RESULTS: Over a mean (standard deviation) follow-up time of 15 (5.0) years, 11 (3.5%) participants died. At baseline, 34% were unmarried, 19% were receiving TLSA, and 71% had ⩾ 1 psychosocial strain component (38% depression; 47% severe stressors; 35% pessimistic thoughts). After concomitant risk factors were adjusted for, being unmarried and receiving TLSA were associated with higher mortality by factors of 6.2 (p= 0.005) and 5.8 (p= 0.006), respectively. Psychosocial strain was only significantly associated with higher mortality in the unadjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Being unmarried and receiving TLSA were associated with significantly higher ACM in this highly marginalized group of immigrant patients.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de Espalda/mortalidad , Dolor Crónico/mortalidad , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes , Ausencia por Enfermedad , Adulto , Dolor de Espalda/rehabilitación , Dolor Crónico/rehabilitación , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Primaria de Salud , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Suecia , Adulto Joven
19.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 101(5): 770-780, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31954696

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the differences between clinical effects of electroacupuncture and biofeedback therapy in addition to conventional treatment in patients with cervical myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic of a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty patients (N=50) aged 25-55 years of both sexes with chronic neck pain diagnosed with MPS (characterized by trigger points within taut bands) were randomly assigned to 2 equal groups of 25 individuals. INTERVENTIONS: The patients in electroacupuncture group were treated with standard acupuncture and concomitant electrical stimulation; those in biofeedback group received visual electromyography biofeedback therapy for muscle activity and relaxation. Both groups received the intervention 2 times a week for a total of 6 sessions. Basic exercise training and medicines were administered for all the patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain severity based on the visual analog scale (VAS), functional status using Neck Disability Index (NDI), cervical range of motion (ROM) using and inclinometer, and pressure pain threshold (PPT) using an algometer were evaluated before and at 3 and 12 weeks after the treatment. Primary outcome was defined as 20% reduction in the 3-month neck pain and dysfunction compared to baseline, assessed through the NDI. RESULTS: Fifty patients (39 women, 11 men) with a mean age (years) ± SD of 39.0±5.5 and neck pain duration (weeks) of 6.0±2.2 were analyzed. All parameters, except for PPT of the lower trapezius and paravertebral muscles were improved significantly in both groups, while baseline values were controlled. The primary outcome was achieved more significantly in the acupuncture group than in the biofeedback group: 20 (80.0%) vs 10 (40.0%); rate ratio=2 with 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19-3.36; number needed to treat (NNT)=2.5 with 95% CI, 1.54-6.58. Advantages of acupuncture over biofeedback were observed according to values obtained from the NDI, VAS, extension and left lateral-bending ROM, and PPT on the left upper trapezius after the last session of intervention until 3 months (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both electroacupuncture and biofeedback therapies were found to be effective in management of MPS when integrated with conventional treatment. However, intergroup differences showed priority of acupuncture in some parameters vs biofeedback. Thus, electroacupuncture seems to be a better complementary modality for treatment of MPS in the neck and upper back area.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de Espalda/rehabilitación , Biorretroalimentación Psicológica , Electroacupuntura , Síndromes del Dolor Miofascial/rehabilitación , Dolor de Cuello/rehabilitación , Adulto , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Electromiografía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Método Simple Ciego , Escala Visual Analógica
20.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 19(1): 714, 2019 Oct 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31639016

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To facilitate access to evidence-based care for back pain, a German private medical insurance offered a health program proactively to their members. Feasibility and long-term efficacy of this approach were evaluated. METHODS: Using Zelen's design, adult members of the health insurance with chronic back pain according to billing data were randomized to the intervention (IG) or the control group (CG). Participants allocated to the IG were invited to participate in the comprehensive health program comprising medical exercise therapy and life style coaching, and those allocated to the CG to a longitudinal back pain survey. Primary outcomes were back pain severity (Korff's Chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire) as well as health-related quality of life (SF-12) assessed by identical online questionnaires at baseline and 2-year follow-up in both study arms. In addition to analyses of covariance, a subgroup analysis explored the heterogeneity of treatment effects among different risks of back pain chronification (STarT Back Tool). RESULTS: Out of 3462 persons selected, randomized and thereafter contacted, 552 agreed to participate. At the 24-month follow-up, data on 189 of 258 (73.3%) of the IG were available, in the CG on 255 of 294 (86.7%). Significant, small beneficial effects were seen in primary outcomes: Compared to the CG, the IG reported less disability (1.6 vs 2.0; p = 0.025; d = 0.24) and scored better at the SF-12 physical health scale (43.3 vs 41.0; p < 0.007; d = 0.26). No effect was seen in back pain intensity and in the SF-12 mental health scale. Persons with medium or high risk of back pain chronification at baseline responded better to the health program in all primary outcomes than the subgroup with low risk at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: After 2 years, the proactive health program resulted in small positive long-term improvements. Using risk screening prior to inclusion in the health program might increase the percentage of participants deriving benefits from it. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register under DRKS00015463 retrospectively (dated 4 Sept 2018).


Asunto(s)
Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Promoción de la Salud , Adulto , Dolor de Espalda/rehabilitación , Dolor Crónico/rehabilitación , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Calidad de Vida
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA