Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.882
Filtrar
1.
PLoS One ; 19(9): e0310523, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39292692

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Racial and ethnic disparities in chronic disease are a major public health priority. OBJECTIVE: To determine if the amount of federal grant funding to federally-qualified health centers (FQHCs) was associated with baseline overall prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension and uncontrolled diabetes, as well as prevalence by racial and ethnic subgroup. DESIGN: Cross-sectional multivariate regression analysis of Uniform Data System 2014-2019, which includes clinic-level data from each FQHC regarding demographics, chronic disease control by race and ethnicity, and grant funding. EXPOSURES: Our main exposure were the average values of the prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension and uncontrolled diabetes among the overall population and by racial and ethnic group from 2014-2016. MAIN OUTCOMES: Average federal grant funding per patient from 2017-2019, as measured by annual health center funding from the Bureau of Primary Health Care (BPHC) and overall federal grant funding. RESULTS: We analyzed 1,205 FQHCs from 2014-2019; the average BPHC grant per patient across all FQHCs in 2019 was $168 while the average total federal grant was $184 per patient. Increasing shares of total patients with uncontrolled hypertension or uncontrolled diabetes were not associated with increased total federal grant funding in either unadjusted or adjusted analysis. Increased shares of patients who are American Indian or Alaskan Native (AI-AN) with uncontrolled hypertension and diabetes were associated with increasing total federal grant funding in both unadjusted and adjusted analysis (adjusted beta hypertension $168.3, p <0.001; adjusted beta diabetes 59.44, p = 0.02). However, cardiovascular clinical need among other racial and ethnic groups was not significantly associated with grant funding. CONCLUSIONS: FQHCs with higher overall rates of uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes do not receive more federal funds, and there is no significant association between federal funding levels and rates of uncontrolled blood pressure or diabetes within most racial and ethnic groups, with the exception of AI-AN populations. To narrow inequities in cardiovascular disease, HRSA should consider more explicitly targeting federal grants to clinics with higher levels of clinical need.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Financiación Gubernamental , Hipertensión , Humanos , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hipertensión/economía , Hipertensión/etnología , Diabetes Mellitus/economía , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Financiación Gubernamental/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etnología , Equidad en Salud/economía , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1152710, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39257955

RESUMEN

Introduction: Obesity, which is partly driven by the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), significantly increases the risk of type-2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases, leading to substantial health and economic burdens. Methods: This study aims to quantify the monetary value of health harms caused by SSB consumption, along with the associated internalities, through a contingent valuation survey. The results are crucial for determining the socially optimal tax rate. Results: We surveyed 293 residents of Wellington, New Zealand, to assess their willingness to pay (WTP) for reductions in the risks of diabetes, stroke, and heart disease associated with SSB intake. Logistic regression analysis revealed the marginal WTP for a 1% risk reduction in diabetes, stroke, and heart disease to be NZ$404.86, NZ$809.04, and NZ$1,236.84, respectively. Based on these values, we estimate the marginal harm from SSB consumption to be approximately NZ$17.37 per liter in New Zealand, with internalities amounting to NZ$6.43 per liter, suggesting an optimal tax rate of NZ$6.49 per liter. Discussion: Implementing such a tax is feasible and would likely double or triple the price of SSBs in New Zealand.


Asunto(s)
Bebidas Azucaradas , Impuestos , Humanos , Bebidas Azucaradas/economía , Bebidas Azucaradas/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Nueva Zelanda , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Impuestos/economía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Obesidad/economía , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economía , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Anciano
4.
PLoS One ; 19(8): e0308734, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39121166

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Western guidelines often recommend biguanides as the first-line treatment for diabetes. However, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, alongside biguanides, are increasingly used as the first-line therapy for type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in Japan. However, there have been few studies comparing the effectiveness of biguanides and DPP-4 inhibitors with respect to diabetes-related complications and cardio-cerebrovascular events over the long term, as well as the costs associated. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with T2DM who initiate treatment with a biguanide versus a DPP-4 inhibitor and the long-term costs associated. METHODS: We performed a cohort study between 2012 and 2021 using a new-user design and the Shizuoka Kokuho database. Patients were included if they were diagnosed with T2DM. The primary outcome was the incidence of cardio-cerebrovascular events or mortality from the initial month of treatment; and the secondary outcomes were the incidences of related complications (nephropathy, renal failure, retinopathy, and peripheral neuropathy) and the daily cost of the drugs used. Individuals who had experienced prior events during the preceding year were excluded, and events within 6 months of the start of the study period were censored. Propensity score matching was performed to compare between two groups. RESULTS: The matched 1:5 cohort comprised 529 and 2,116 patients who were initially treated with a biguanide or a DPP-4 inhibitor, respectively. Although there were no significant differences in the incidence of cardio-cerebrovascular events or mortality and T2DM-related complications between the two groups (p = 0.139 and p = 0.595), daily biguanide administration was significantly cheaper (mean daily cost for biguanides, 61.1 JPY; for DPP-4 inhibitors, 122.7 JPY; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with T2DM who initiate pharmacotherapy, there were no differences in the long-term incidences of cardio-cerebrovascular events or complications associated with biguanide or DPP-4 use, but the former was less costly.


Asunto(s)
Biguanidas , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Retinopatía Diabética , Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Biguanidas/efectos adversos , Biguanidas/economía , Biguanidas/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios de Cohortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economía , Nefropatías Diabéticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Nefropatías Diabéticas/economía , Neuropatías Diabéticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neuropatías Diabéticas/economía , Retinopatía Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Retinopatía Diabética/economía , Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV/economía , Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV/efectos adversos , Hipoglucemiantes/economía , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Japón , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 49(11): 102788, 2024 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39127430

RESUMEN

As cannabis use is rising and federal restrictions are easing, it is important to recognize its potential adverse cardiovascular effects for better risk stratification and informed guidance. We conducted a retrospective study using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2019, where 39,992 subjects were enrolled. The extracted population was classified into two groups based on the presence of cannabis-related disorders. The primary outcomes of the study were cardiovascular-related adverse events, in-hospital mortality, total cost of hospitalization, and cardiac dysrhythmias. The study concluded that cannabis use disorder was not significantly associated with the likelihood of having a cardiovascular adverse event, cardiac dysrhythmias, or with the cost of hospitalization when controlling for other variables (p = 0.257, p=0.481 & p = 0.481, respectively). However, it was significantly associated with the likelihood of mortality (p < 0.0001). Further randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings and elaborate on identified associations.


Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Arritmias Cardíacas/economía , Arritmias Cardíacas/mortalidad , Arritmias Cardíacas/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Adulto , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Abuso de Marihuana/complicaciones , Abuso de Marihuana/economía , Abuso de Marihuana/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Factores de Riesgo
8.
PLoS One ; 19(7): e0307468, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39028718

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Risk stratification scores such as the European Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) are used to guide individuals on cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. Adding high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI) to such risk scores has the potential to improve accuracy of CVD prediction. We investigated how applying hsTnI in addition to SCORE may impact management, outcome, and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: Characteristics of 72,190 apparently healthy individuals from the Biomarker for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Europe (BiomarCaRE) project were included into a discrete-event simulation comparing two strategies for assessing CVD risk. The standard strategy reflecting current practice employed SCORE (SCORE); the alternative strategy involved adding hsTnI information for further stratifying SCORE risk categories (S-SCORE). Individuals were followed over ten years from baseline examination to CVD event, death or end of follow-up. The model tracked the occurrence of events and calculated direct costs of screening, prevention, and treatment from a European health system perspective. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in € per quality-adjusted life year (QALYs) gained during 10 years of follow-up. Outputs were validated against observed rates, and results were tested in deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: S-SCORE yielded a change in management for 10.0% of individuals, and a reduction in CVD events (4.85% vs. 5.38%, p<0.001) and mortality (6.80% vs. 7.04%, p<0.001). S-SCORE led to 23 (95%CI: 20-26) additional event-free years and 7 (95%CI: 5-9) additional QALYs per 1,000 subjects screened, and resulted in a relative risk reduction for CVD of 9.9% (95%CI: 7.3-13.5%) with a number needed to screen to prevent one event of 183 (95%CI: 172 to 203). S-SCORE increased costs per subject by 187€ (95%CI: 177 € to 196 €), leading to an ICER of 27,440€/QALY gained. Sensitivity analysis was performed with eligibility for treatment being the most sensitive. CONCLUSION: Adding a person's hsTnI value to SCORE can impact clinical decision making and eventually improves QALYs and is cost-effective compared to CVD prevention strategies using SCORE alone. Stratifying SCORE risk classes for hsTnI would likely offer cost-effective alternatives, particularly when targeting higher risk groups.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Troponina I , Humanos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/sangre , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Troponina I/sangre , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Biomarcadores/sangre , Anciano , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Adulto , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca
9.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 2003, 2024 Jul 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39061035

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are non-communicable diseases that impose a significant economic burden on healthcare systems, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hospital treatment cost for cardiovascular disease events (CVDEs) in patients with and without diabetes and identify factors influencing cost. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study using administrative data from three public tertiary hospitals in Malaysia. Data for hospital admissions between 1 March 2019 and 1 March 2020 with International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes for acute myocardial infarction (MI), ischaemic heart disease (IHD), hypertensive heart disease, stroke, heart failure, cardiomyopathy, and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) were retrieved from the Malaysian Disease Related Group (Malaysian DRG) Casemix System. Patients were stratified by T2DM status for analyses. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors influencing treatment costs. RESULTS: Of the 1,183 patients in our study cohort, approximately 60.4% had T2DM. The most common CVDE was acute MI (25.6%), followed by IHD (25.3%), hypertensive heart disease (18.9%), stroke (12.9%), heart failure (9.4%), cardiomyopathy (5.7%) and PVD (2.1%). Nearly two-thirds (62.4%) of the patients had at least one cardiovascular risk factor, with hypertension being the most prevalent (60.4%). The treatment cost for all CVDEs was RM 4.8 million and RM 3.7 million in the T2DM and non-T2DM group, respectively. IHD incurred the largest cost in both groups, constituting 30.0% and 50.0% of the total CVDE treatment cost for patients with and without T2DM, respectively. Predictors of high treatment cost included male gender, non-minority ethnicity, IHD diagnosis and moderate-to-high severity level. CONCLUSION: This study provides real-world cost estimates for CVDE hospitalisation and quantifies the combined burden of two major non-communicable disease categories at the public health provider level. Our results confirm that CVDs are associated with substantial health utilisation in both T2DM and non-T2DM patients.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economía , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Malasia/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Anciano , Adulto , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos
10.
Cardiovasc Diabetol ; 23(1): 246, 2024 Jul 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38987782

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study quantifies the longitudinal economic burden for a wide spectrum of incident complications, metabolic syndrome (MS)-related risk factors, and comorbidities in patients with MS. METHODS: This retrospective study utilized linked data from the 2013 National Health Interview Survey and the 2012-2021 National Health Insurance Research Database to identify MS individuals and their characteristics. The incidence rate of each complication was calculated as the number of complication events in the study period divided by the total person-years during follow-up. The healthcare costs of complications were analyzed using a generalized estimating equation model to determine the cost impact of complications after adjustment for patients' characteristics. Sensitivity analyses on variables with high missing rates (i.e., cause of death, body mass index) were performed. RESULTS: Among 837 identified MS individuals over 8.28 (± 1.35) years of follow-up, the most frequent complications were microvascular diseases (incidence rate for nephropathy/retinopathy/neuropathy: 6.49/2.64/2.08 events per 100 person-years), followed by cardiovascular diseases (2.47), peripheral vascular diseases (2.01), and cancers (1.53). Death was the costliest event (event-year cost per person: USD 16,429) and cancers were the most expensive complications (USD 9,127-11,083 for non-MS- and MS-related cancers). Developing non-MS/MS-related cancers, cardiovascular diseases, and obesity-related medical conditions increased annual costs by 273% (95% CI: 181-397%)/175% (105-269%), 159% (118-207%), and 140% (84-214%), respectively. Microvascular diseases had the lowest cost impact on annual costs (i.e., 27% [17-39%]/27% [11-46%]/24% [11-37%] increases for nephropathy/neuropathy/retinopathy, respectively). Having existing comorbidities increased annual costs by 20% (osteoarthritis) to 108% (depression). Having morbid obesity (i.e., body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m2) increased annual costs by 58% (30-91%). CONCLUSIONS: The economic burden from costly incident complications (i.e., cardiovascular diseases, peripheral vascular diseases, cancers), MS-related risk factors (i.e., morbid obesity), and comorbidities (i.e., depression) highlight the urgent need for early intervention to prevent MS and its progression. The comprehensive cost estimates reported in this study can facilitate the parameterization of economic analyses to identify cost-effective interventions for these patients.


Asunto(s)
Comorbilidad , Costo de Enfermedad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Síndrome Metabólico , Humanos , Síndrome Metabólico/economía , Síndrome Metabólico/epidemiología , Síndrome Metabólico/mortalidad , Incidencia , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Factores de Tiempo , Estudios Longitudinales , Anciano , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo Cardiometabólico , Neoplasias/economía , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico
11.
J Med Econ ; 27(1): 919-930, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38953706

RESUMEN

AIMS: This study aimed to assess and compare the health care resource utilization (HCRU) and medical cost of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) by disease severity based on Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4) score among US adults in a real-world setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational cohort study used claims data from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD) to compare all-cause, cardiovascular (CV)-related, and liver-related HCRU, including hospitalization, and medical costs stratified by FIB-4 score among patients with MASH (identified by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-10-CM] code K75.81). Hospitalization and medical costs were compared by FIB-4 score using generalized linear regression with negative binomial and gamma distribution models, respectively, while controlling for confounders. RESULTS: The cohort included a total of 5,104 patients with MASH and comprised 3,162, 1,343, and 599 patients with low, indeterminate, and high FIB-4 scores, respectively. All-cause hospitalization was significantly higher in the high FIB-4 cohort when compared with the low FIB-4 reference after covariate adjustment (rate ratio, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.32-2.02; p < .0001). CV-related hospitalization was similar across all cohorts; however, CV-related costs were 1.26 times higher (95% CI, 1.11-1.45; p < .001) in the indeterminate cohort and 2.15 times higher (95% CI, 1.77-2.62; p < .0001) in the high FIB-4 cohort when compared with the low FIB-4 cohort. Patients with indeterminate and high FIB-4 scores had 2.97 (95% CI, 1.78-4.95) and 12.08 (95% CI, 7.35-19.88) times the rate of liver-related hospitalization and were 3.68 (95% CI, 3.11-4.34) and 33.73 (95% CI, 27.39-41.55) times more likely to incur liver-related costs, respectively (p < .0001 for all). LIMITATIONS: This claims-based analysis relied on diagnostic coding accuracy, which may not capture the presence of all diseases or all care received. CONCLUSIONS: High and indeterminate FIB-4 scores were associated with significantly higher liver-related clinical and economic burdens than low FIB-4 scores among patients with MASH.


MASH is a serious liver disease that can lead to fibrosis, cirrhosis, and other complications. There is a need to understand the impact of disease severity on the burden of MASH. Health care claims data were used to assess the use of medical resources, including hospitalization, and medical costs among patients with 3 different levels of severity of MASH, as assessed via FIB-4 score. FIB-4 is a widely available non-invasive marker of severity. Rates of all-cause, cardiovascular-related and liver-related hospitalization and medical costs were several-fold higher in patients with high disease severity of MASH than those with low disease severity of MASH.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Hígado Graso/economía , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos en Salud/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Comorbilidad , Enfermedades Metabólicas
12.
Glob Heart ; 19(1): 56, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38973984

RESUMEN

Background: The recent inclusion of polypills-fixed-dose combinations of antihypertensive medicines and a statin with or without aspirin-in the World Health Organization's Essential Medicines List (EML) reiterates the potential of this approach to improve global treatment coverage for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Although there exists extensive evidence on the effectiveness, safety and acceptability of polypills, there has been no research to date assessing the real-world availability and affordability of polypills globally. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey, based on the WHO/Health Action International methodology, in 13 countries around the world. In the surveyed countries, we first ascertained whether any polypill was authorised for marketing and/or included in EMLs and clinical guidelines. In each country, we collected retail and price data for polypills from at least one public-sector facility and three private pharmacies using convenience sampling. Polypills were considered unaffordable if the lowest-paid worker spent more than a day's wage to purchase a monthly supply. Results: Polypills were approved for marketing in four of the 13 surveyed countries: Spain, India, Mauritius and Argentina. None of these countries included polypills in national guidelines, formularies, or EMLs. In the four countries, no surveyed public pharmacies stocked polypills. In the private sector, we identified seven unique polypill combinations, marketed by eight different companies. Private sector availability was 100% in Argentina and Spain. Most combinations (n = 5) identified were in India. Combinations found in India and Spain were affordable in the local context. A lowest-paid government worker would spend between 0.2 (India) and 2.8 (Mauritius) days' wages to pay the price for one month's supply of the polypills. Polypills were likely to be affordable if they were manufactured in the same country. Conclusion: Low availability and affordability of polypills in the public sector suggest that implementation remains poor globally. Context-specific multi-disciplinary health system research is required to understand factors affecting polypill implementation and to design and evaluate appropriate implementation strategies.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Combinación de Medicamentos , India/epidemiología , Antihipertensivos/economía , Antihipertensivos/administración & dosificación , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , España/epidemiología , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Aspirina/economía , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/economía , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Salud Global , Argentina/epidemiología
13.
Circulation ; 150(4): e89-e101, 2024 Jul 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38832515

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Quantifying the economic burden of cardiovascular disease and stroke over the coming decades may inform policy, health system, and community-level interventions for prevention and treatment. METHODS: We used nationally representative health, economic, and demographic data to project health care costs attributable to key cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia) and conditions (coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure, atrial fibrillation) through 2050. The human capital approach was used to estimate productivity losses from morbidity and premature mortality due to cardiovascular conditions. RESULTS: One in 3 US adults received care for a cardiovascular risk factor or condition in 2020. Annual inflation-adjusted (2022 US dollars) health care costs of cardiovascular risk factors are projected to triple between 2020 and 2050, from $400 billion to $1344 billion. For cardiovascular conditions, annual health care costs are projected to almost quadruple, from $393 billion to $1490 billion, and productivity losses are projected to increase by 54%, from $234 billion to $361 billion. Stroke is projected to account for the largest absolute increase in costs. Large relative increases among the Asian American population (497%) and Hispanic American population (489%) reflect the projected increases in the size of these populations. CONCLUSIONS: The economic burden of cardiovascular risk factors and overt cardiovascular disease in the United States is projected to increase substantially in the coming decades. Development and deployment of cost-effective programs and policies to promote cardiovascular health are urgently needed to rein in costs and to equitably enhance population health.


Asunto(s)
American Heart Association , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Costo de Enfermedad , Predicción , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/economía , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Costos de la Atención en Salud/tendencias , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad
14.
Ethn Dis ; 34(1): 41-48, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38854787

RESUMEN

Background: The ability to meet current and ongoing financial obligations, known as financial well-being (FWB), is not only associated with the likelihood of adverse health events but is also affected by unexpected health care expenditures. However, the relationship between FWB and common health outcomes is not well understood. Using data available in the Financial Well-Being Scale from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, we evaluated the impact of four vascular conditions-cardiovascular disease (CVD), stroke, high blood pressure (BP), and high cholesterol-on FWB and how these impacts varied between racial and ethnic groups. Methods: Using the Understanding America Survey-a nationally representative, longitudinal panel-we identified adults with self-reported diagnoses between 2014 and 2020 of high cholesterol, high BP, stroke, and CVD. We used stratified, longitudinal mixed regression models to assess the association between these diagnoses and FWB. Each condition was modeled separately and included sex, age, marital status, household size, income, education, race/ethnicity, insurance, body mass index, and an indicator of the condition. Racial and ethnic differentials were captured using group-condition interactions. Results: On average, Whites had the highest FWB Scale score (69.0, SD=21.8), followed by other races (66.7, SD=21.0), Hispanics (59.3, SD=21.6), and Blacks (56.2, SD=21.4). In general, FWB of individuals with vascular conditions was lower than that of those without, but the impact varied between racial and ethnic groups. Compared with Whites (the reference group), Blacks with CVD (-7.4, SD=1.0), stroke (-8.1, SD=1.5), high cholesterol (-5.7, SD=0.7), and high BP (6.1, SD=0.7) had lower FWB. Similarly, Hispanics with high BP (-3.0, SD=0.6) and CVD (-6.3, SD=1.3) had lower FWB. Income, education, insurance, and marital status were also correlated with FWB. Conclusions: These results indicated differences in the financial ramifications of vascular conditions among racial and ethnic groups. Findings suggest the need for interventions targeting FWB of individuals with vascular conditions, particularly those from minority groups.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Hispánicos o Latinos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Negro o Afroamericano/psicología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etnología , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Hipertensión/etnología , Estudios Longitudinales , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etnología , Estados Unidos , Enfermedades Vasculares/etnología , Blanco
15.
Sante Publique ; 36(3): 127-136, 2024.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38906807

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The management of cardiovascular pathologies has a high cost for users. PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH: It is therefore important to assess the costs of hospitalization to gain a better understanding of its impact on care. RESULTS: This was a case series-type, descriptive, observational study with prospective data collection. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were included, with a mean age of 51 years and extremes ranging from 14 to 86 years. The average length of stay was 7.1 days. Heart failure was the most frequent pathology (61.7%). The average monthly income per patient was 101,360 CFA francs. The average total direct cost during hospitalization was 114,015 CFAF. The average direct cost of drugs and consumables was 60,553.77 CFAF. The average direct cost of paraclinical examinations was 34,360.29 CFAF. Hospitalization costs averaged 16,747.47 CFAF. Total direct costs during hospitalization were 11,737,060 CFAF, dominated by drugs and medical consumables (53.14%), followed by complementary examinations (29.86%) and non-medical expenses (17%). During the study, 13.59% of patients were discharged against medical advice. Expenses were covered by the parents in 71.84% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The average direct cost of hospitalization is well above the purchasing power of the majority of patients.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Hospitalización , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Burkina Faso , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Estudios Prospectivos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos
16.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 49(9): 102724, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38925205

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sports medical examinations are a tool to detect potentially life-threatening situations during physical activity, but their usefulness and protocols in young athletes remain controversial. The aim was to describe the diagnostic performance of a 2-step ECG and echocardiogram screening model in a large sample of healthy young-adolescent athletes (aged 11-16 years), evaluating its cost-effectiveness for cardiovascular disease (CVD) detection. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 2617 individuals (81 % male, mean age 15 years), over 20 federated sports (La Rioja-Spain). A cardiological examination included family and personal history, physical examination, ECG, and transthoracic echocardiogram. The previous ECG, conducted at 11-13 years old, was reviewed in 1589 individuals (60 %). ECGs were interpreted according to 2017 international criteria. The prevalence of structural cardiac disease (CD) was investigated, and the diagnostic performance of both tests and the cost of screening was evaluated. RESULTS: CVD was diagnosed in 63 athletes (2.4 %) and 16 (0.6 %) with pathology related to sudden cardiac death (SCD). In 3 cases (0.11 %), cessation of sporting activity was indicated, and in 2 cases (0.07 %) treatment for congenital CD was indicated. ECG alterations were infrequent (2.5 %). Eighty percent of the structural CD diagnosed by echocardiogram had a normal ECG. The cost per CVD detected was €3,080, and for CVD associated with SCD, it was €12,323. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows the diagnostic cost-effectiveness of a two-step cardiac screening protocol, including ECG, and highlights the role of echocardiography in young adolescent athletes, which could be implemented at a low and reasonable cost.


Asunto(s)
Atletas , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Ecocardiografía , Electrocardiografía , Humanos , Adolescente , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Ecocardiografía/economía , Niño , Atletas/estadística & datos numéricos , Electrocardiografía/economía , Electrocardiografía/métodos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , España/epidemiología , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/epidemiología , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Prevalencia
17.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ; 24(8): 967-975, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38848115

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a single-pill combination (SPC) of perindopril/amlodipine/indapamide versus its free equivalent combination (FEC) in adults with hypertension in Italy. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to perform a cost-utility analysis with a lifetime horizon and an Italian healthcare payer's perspective. In the model, the additional effect of the SPC on blood pressure level compared with the FEC was translated into a decreased risk of cardiovascular events and CKD, which was modeled via Framingham risk algorithms. Difference in persistence rates of SPC and FEC were modeled via discontinuation rates. RESULTS: A perindopril/amlodipine/indapamide SPC is associated with lower cost and better health outcomes compared to its FEC. Over a lifetime horizon, it is associated with a 0.050 QALY gain and cost savings of €376, resulting from lower cardiovascular event rates. In the alternative scenario, where different approach for modeling impact of adherence was considered, incremental gain of 0.069 QALY and savings of €1,004 were observed. Results were robust to sensitivity and scenario analyses, indicating that use of this SPC is a cost-effective strategy. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that a perindopril/amlodipine/indapamide SPC is a cost-saving treatment option for hypertension in Italy, compared to its FEC.


Asunto(s)
Amlodipino , Antihipertensivos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Combinación de Medicamentos , Hipertensión , Indapamida , Cadenas de Markov , Perindopril , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Indapamida/administración & dosificación , Indapamida/economía , Perindopril/administración & dosificación , Perindopril/economía , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Antihipertensivos/administración & dosificación , Antihipertensivos/economía , Italia , Amlodipino/administración & dosificación , Amlodipino/economía , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Masculino , Ahorro de Costo , Femenino , Anciano , Análisis de Costo-Efectividad
18.
Clin Cardiol ; 47(6): e24302, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38874052

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is no widely accepted care model for managing high-need, high-cost (HNHC) patients. We hypothesized that a Home Heart Hospital (H3), which provides longitudinal, hospital-level at-home care, would improve care quality and reduce costs for HNHC patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate associations between enrollment in H3, which provides longitudinal, hospital-level at-home care, care quality, and costs for HNHC patients with CVD. METHODS: This retrospective within-subject cohort study used insurance claims and electronic health records data to evaluate unadjusted and adjusted annualized hospitalization rates, total costs of care, part A costs, and mortality rates before, during, and following H3. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were enrolled in H3 between February 2019 and October 2021. Patients' mean age was 75 years and 50% were female. Common comorbidities included congestive heart failure (50%), atrial fibrillation (37%), coronary artery disease (44%). Relative to pre-enrollment, enrollment in H3 was associated with significant reductions in annualized hospitalization rates (absolute reduction (AR): 2.4 hospitalizations/year, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: -0.8, -4.0; p < 0.001; total costs of care (AR: -$56 990, 95% CI: -$105 170, -$8810; p < 0.05; and part A costs (AR: -$78 210, 95% CI: -$114 770, -$41 640; p < 0.001). Annualized post-H3 total costs and part A costs were significantly lower than pre-enrollment costs (total costs of care: -$113 510, 95% CI: -$151 340, -$65 320; p < 0.001; part A costs: -$84 480, 95% CI: -$121 040, -$47 920; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal home-based care models hold promise for improving quality and reducing healthcare spending for HNHC patients with CVD.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Hospitalización , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Hospitalización/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Servicios de Atención a Domicilio Provisto por Hospital/economía , Costos de Hospital , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Persona de Mediana Edad
19.
JAMA Health Forum ; 5(6): e241478, 2024 Jun 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38874961

RESUMEN

This cross-sectional study examines the growth in numbers and geographic locations of private equity acquisitions in cardiology across the US.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Sector Privado , Humanos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Sector Privado/economía , Sector Privado/tendencias , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA