RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Research examining the effect of changes in Medicaid dental benefits on emergency department (ED) use for dental conditions has had mixed results. We examined the effect of changes in Medicaid dental benefits on ED use for nontraumatic dental conditions (NTDCs) among adults in Massachusetts before and after Medicaid dental benefits for adults were eliminated (July 2010) and partially restored (January 2013). METHODS: We used 2009-2013 data from the Massachusetts All-Payer Claims Database. The study population included Medicaid enrollees aged ≥21 who made a visit to the ED for an NTDC that was paid for by Medicaid during the study period. We used an interrupted time-series study design and segmented regression model to assess the effect of the policy changes on ED use for NTDCs. We also conducted a subanalysis by patient age, sex, and geographic location. RESULTS: During the study period, 21 731 Medicaid enrollees aged ≥21 made 35 660 NTDC ED visits. Eliminating comprehensive dental benefits led to a significant increase in the use of EDs for NTDCs. This increase occurred over time (11% increase at 15 months after elimination of comprehensive dental benefits; estimate, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.07-1.21]; P = .03) rather than immediately after the policy change took effect. The partial restoration of certain dental benefits led to a significant decrease in the rate of ED visits for NTDCs over time (15.7% decrease at 5 months after partial restoration of certain dental benefits; estimate, -0.97 [95% CI, -1.83 to -0.11]; P = .03). CONCLUSION: Strengthening dental coverage policies for adult Medicaid enrollees could decrease their reliance on EDs for NTDCs.
Asunto(s)
Instituciones Odontológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid/economía , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/economía , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Massachusetts , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the associations between self-reported ability to afford dental care and quality of life in adults aged 45 years and older. Method: We used publicly available cross-sectional data from the 2008 National Health Interview Survey and its oral health supplement for 11,760 adults aged 45+ years. The increased probabilities of reporting dental problems attributable to an inability to afford dental care were estimated from multivariate models and combined with respective dental problem disability weights from the Global Burden of Disease to measure loss in quality of life. Results: Prevalence of reported inability to afford dental care, severe tooth loss, severe periodontitis, and untreated caries were 11.9%, 8.5%, 14.3%, and 37.9%, respectively. Inability to afford dental care was associated with an increase of 0.017 disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) per person per year under base case and 0.020 DALYs under generous assumptions. Conclusion: Making dental care affordable could improve adult's (age 45 and above) quality of life at a reasonable cost.
Asunto(s)
Atención Odontológica/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Carga Global de Enfermedades , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Seguro Odontológico/economía , Masculino , Medicaid , Medicare , Persona de Mediana Edad , Salud Bucal , Calidad de Vida , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/economía , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To present the impact of the financial crisis on health status and dental health in Greece and compare it to the European Union and Finland and to identify any changes in health-related expenditure focusing on pharmaceutical expenditure and generic medicines. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Databases as Scopus, Pubmed, Google Scholar, World Health Organization, Eurostat, and Elstat were used. FINDINGS: Indicators, such as mortality and life expectancy, show that there is no clear correlation between health deterioration and financial crisis while dental health has deteriorated. Out-of-pocket expenses were found to be catastrophic, and the use of generic medicines is still limited. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Proper prescribing of medicines, coverage of health care costs by the government, and cost savings from the use of generic medicines were implemented. As regards dental care, the state should focus on prevention as well as reinforcement of public dental care services. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The break through idea is to compare the impact of the financial crisis on health indexes in Greece with the European Union and Finland, to focus on pharmaceutical expenditure, generic medicines, and dental health.
Asunto(s)
Recesión Económica , Estado de Salud , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Recesión Económica/estadística & datos numéricos , Unión Europea/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Financiación Gubernamental/economía , Financiación Gubernamental/estadística & datos numéricos , Finlandia/epidemiología , Grecia/epidemiología , Producto Interno Bruto/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Esperanza de Vida , Masculino , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Salud Bucal/economía , Salud Bucal/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Perinatal , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/economíaAsunto(s)
Salud Bucal/economía , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Humanos , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/economía , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/terapia , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud/normasRESUMEN
Up-to-date information about the economic impact of dental diseases is essential for health care decision makers when seeking to make rational use of available resources. The purpose of this study was to provide up-to-date estimates for dental expenditures (direct costs) and productivity losses (indirect costs) due to dental diseases on the global, regional, and country level. Direct costs of dental diseases were estimated using a previously established systematic approach; indirect costs were estimated using an approach developed by the World Health Organization Commission on Macroeconomics and Health and factoring in 2015 values for gross domestic product and disability-adjusted life years from the Global Burden of Disease Study. The estimated direct costs of dental diseases amounted to $356.80 billion and indirect costs were estimated at $187.61 billion, totaling worldwide costs due to dental diseases of $544.41 billion in 2015. After adjustment for purchasing power parity, the highest levels of per capita dental expenditures were found for High-Income North America, Australasia, Western Europe, High-Income Asia Pacific, and East Asia; the highest levels of per capita productivity losses were found for Western Europe, Australasia, High-Income North America, High-Income Asia Pacific, and Central Europe. Severe tooth loss was found to imply 67% of global productivity losses due to dental diseases, followed by severe periodontitis (21%) and untreated caries (12%). From an economic perspective, improvements in population oral health may be highly beneficial and could contribute to further increases in people's well-being given available resources.
Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Salud Global/economía , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Global/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
In Canada, about 1% of all emergency room (ER) visits in a given year are made by patients with a primary diagnosis of a non-traumatic, non-urgent and yet preventable condition, such as tooth decay. This percentage is typically dismissed as irrelevant. Using 2013-2014 British Columbia data on ER use from the Canadian Institute for Health Information, however, we argue that the 1% figure (and its associated cost) has to be considered beyond its percentage value. In 2013-2014 alone, 12 357 non-traumatic dental visits were made to ERs in BC representing 1% of the total number of ER visits at a cost of $154.8 million to the taxpayers (across Canada, all visits to ER cost $1.8 billion/year). But the vast majority of these dental visits are discharged while the oral problem likely persists, hence taxpayer dollars are wasted. The belief that these dental-related ER visits are insignificant within the total cost for the health care system is misleading: treatment is not given, the problem is not resolved, and yet there is a high cost to taxpayers and to the society at large. Public health resources should be reallocated.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/economía , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/terapia , Colombia Británica , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The number of Acute Dental Infections (ADI) presenting for emergency department (ED) care are steadily increasing. Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy (OPAT) programs are increasingly utilized as an alternative cost-effective approach to the management of serious infectious diseases but their role in the management of severe ADI is not established. This study aims to address this knowledge gap through evaluation of ADI referrals to a regional OPAT program in a large Canadian center. METHODS: All adult ED and OPAT program ADI referrals from four acute care adult hospitals in Calgary, Alberta, were quantified using ICD diagnosis codes in a regional reporting system. Citywide OPAT program referrals were prospectively enrolled over a five-month period from February to June 2014. Participants completed a questionnaire and OPAT medical records were reviewed upon completion of care. RESULTS: Of 704 adults presenting to acute care facilities with dental infections during the study period 343 (49%) were referred to OPAT for ADI treatment and 110 were included in the study. Participant mean age was 44 years, 55% were women, and a majority of participants had dental insurance (65%), had seen a dentist in the past six months (65%) and reported prior dental infections (77%), 36% reporting the current ADI as a recurrence. Median length of parenteral antibiotic therapy was 3 days, average total course of antibiotics was 15-days, with a cumulative 1326 antibiotic days over the study period. There was no difference in total duration of antibiotics between broad and narrow spectrum regimes. Conservative cost estimate of OPAT care was $120,096, a cost savings of $597,434 (83%) compared with hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: ADI represent a common preventable cause of recurrent morbidity. Although OPAT programs may offer short-term cost savings compared with hospitalization, risks associated with extended antibiotic exposures and delayed definitive dental management must also be gauged.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades Transmisibles/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Alberta/epidemiología , Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Antibacterianos/economía , Canadá/epidemiología , Enfermedades Transmisibles/economía , Enfermedades Transmisibles/epidemiología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Infusiones Parenterales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Estudios Prospectivos , Salud Pública/economía , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/economía , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Reporting the economic burden of oral diseases is important to evaluate the societal relevance of preventing and addressing oral diseases. In addition to treatment costs, there are indirect costs to consider, mainly in terms of productivity losses due to absenteeism from work. The purpose of the present study was to estimate the direct and indirect costs of dental diseases worldwide to approximate the global economic impact. Estimation of direct treatment costs was based on a systematic approach. For estimation of indirect costs, an approach suggested by the World Health Organization's Commission on Macroeconomics and Health was employed, which factored in 2010 values of gross domestic product per capita as provided by the International Monetary Fund and oral burden of disease estimates from the 2010 Global Burden of Disease Study. Direct treatment costs due to dental diseases worldwide were estimated at US$298 billion yearly, corresponding to an average of 4.6% of global health expenditure. Indirect costs due to dental diseases worldwide amounted to US$144 billion yearly, corresponding to economic losses within the range of the 10 most frequent global causes of death. Within the limitations of currently available data sources and methodologies, these findings suggest that the global economic impact of dental diseases amounted to US$442 billion in 2010. Improvements in population oral health may imply substantial economic benefits not only in terms of reduced treatment costs but also because of fewer productivity losses in the labor market.
Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Salud Global/economía , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/economía , Absentismo , Atención Odontológica/economía , Economía en Odontología/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Global/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
We analyzed 2010 US National Emergency Department Sample data and ran regression models to test the hypotheses that individuals with ASD are more likely to have non-traumatic dental condition (NTDC)-related emergency department (ED) visits and to incur greater costs for these visits than those without ASD. There were nearly 2.3 million NTDC-related ED visits in 2010. Less than 1.0% (children) and 2.1% (adults) of all ED visits were for NTDC. There was no significant difference in NTDC-related ED visits or costs for children by ASD status. Adults with ASD had significantly lower odds of NTDC-related ED visits (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.29, 0.52; p < 0.001) but incurred significantly greater mean costs for NTDC-related ED visits (p < 0.006) than did adults without ASD.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Generalizados del Desarrollo Infantil/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Trastornos Generalizados del Desarrollo Infantil/complicaciones , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/complicaciones , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
We used data from Boston Medical Center, Massachusetts, to determine whether dental-related emergency department (ED) visits and costs increased when Medicaid coverage for adult dental care was reduced in July 2010. In this retrospective study of existing data, we examined the safety-net hospital's dental-related ED visits and costs for 3 years before and 2 years after Massachusetts Health Care Reform. Dental-related ED visits increased 2% the first and 14% the second year after Medicaid cuts. Percentage increases were highest among older adults, minorities, and persons receiving charity care, Medicaid, and Medicare.
Asunto(s)
Atención Odontológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid/organización & administración , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Presupuestos , Atención Odontológica/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Femenino , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/economía , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Masculino , Massachusetts , Medicaid/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/economía , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Population-level research is an essential area of health with the potential to affect quality of life and the broader economy. There are excellent epidemiological studies that have improved health services, but traditional research requires a considerable investment. Although electronic technology has changed the practice of many industries with improved efficiency, its application to health is relatively new. Termed 'e-health', this emerging area has been defined by the World Health Organization as the use of information technology to support many aspects of health such as in administration and scientific information. However, not all professionals are convinced of its use. This paper presents a novel application of this emerging area to describe the benefit in data collation and research to support one of the most pressing issues in public health: oral health and policy. Using the Chronic Disease Dental Scheme as an example, a critical discussion of its benefit to population-level research is presented. The Chronic Disease Dental Scheme method of electronic administration has been shown to enhance research and to complement existing progress in health data linkage. e-Health is an invaluable tool for population-level dental research.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Dental/provisión & distribución , Investigación Dental/organización & administración , Informática Médica/organización & administración , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/epidemiología , Anciano , Australia/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Servicios de Salud Dental/economía , Servicios de Salud Dental/organización & administración , Investigación Dental/métodos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Implementación de Plan de Salud/métodos , Implementación de Plan de Salud/organización & administración , Política de Salud/economía , Política de Salud/tendencias , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/normas , Cobertura del Seguro/tendencias , Informática Médica/métodos , Informática Médica/tendencias , Programas Nacionales de Salud/normas , Programas Nacionales de Salud/tendencias , Polifarmacia , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/complicaciones , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/economía , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To study cervical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections using a national database with the goal of providing normative data and identifying variations in resource utilization. DESIGN: Retrospective review using a pediatric national data set (Kids' Inpatient Database 2009). SUBJECTS: Inclusion criteria were admissions with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, codes for both MRSA and specific neck and pharyngeal infections. RESULTS: There were 26,829 admissions with MRSA; 3571 included a head and neck infection. The mean (SE) age at admission was 7.72 (0.20) years. Most patients (65.0%) were in the lower 2 socioeconomic quartiles; the most common payer was Medicaid (53.3%). The mean total charge per admission was $20,442. The mean (SE) length of stay (LOS) was 4.39 (0.15) days; there were significant differences among age (P < .001) and racial (P < .001) groups. A total of 1671 children underwent at least 1 surgical drainage procedure; there were statistically significant differences among racial (P < .001), age (P < .001), and socioeconomic (P = .048) groups. There were no regional variations in resource utilization when LOS, number of procedures, and total hospital charges were compared. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical MRSA infections have a large socioeconomic impact across the nation. There are differences among the various races in resource utilization. Younger children have longer hospitalizations, are more likely to need surgery, and require more intubations. Children from the lowest socioeconomic group require surgery more frequently, but their LOS is not statistically different when compared with the other 3 groups. Knowledge of such characteristics for cervical MRSA infections in children can facilitate targeted clinical interventions to improve care of affected populations.
Asunto(s)
Absceso/economía , Celulitis (Flemón)/economía , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/economía , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/economía , Absceso/epidemiología , Absceso/microbiología , Absceso/terapia , Factores de Edad , Celulitis (Flemón)/epidemiología , Celulitis (Flemón)/microbiología , Celulitis (Flemón)/terapia , Niño , Preescolar , Bases de Datos Factuales , Drenaje , Femenino , Precios de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Renta , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Medicaid , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/terapia , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/microbiología , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) adopts as a final rule the proposal to amend its adjudication regulations regarding service connection of dental conditions for treatment purposes. This amendment clarifies that principles governing determinations by VA's Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) for service connection of dental conditions for the purpose of establishing eligibility for dental treatment by VA's Veterans Health Administration (VHA), apply only when VHA requests information or a rating from VBA for those purposes. This amendment also clarifies existing regulatory provisions and reflects the respective responsibilities of VHA and VBA in determinations concerning eligibility for dental treatment.
Asunto(s)
Atención Odontológica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Determinación de la Elegibilidad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Beneficios del Seguro/legislación & jurisprudencia , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/economía , Salud de los Veteranos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Veteranos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Salud de los Veteranos/economíaRESUMEN
Although anesthesiologists consistently work in the mouth of patients, they may not have been exposed to a comprehensive education of teeth, surrounding tissues, and intraoral prostheses. Since perioperative dental damage is one of the most common anesthesia-related adverse events and is responsible for the greatest number of malpractice claims against anesthesiologists, several dental considerations are warranted. The likelihood of perioperative dental trauma increases with the vulnerability of a patient's dentition and the presence of associated anesthesia risk factors. Minimizing dental injuries begins with the anesthesiologist's preoperative assessment of the patient's dentition and intraoral tissues. Clear documentation of the patient's preoperative dental condition and notifying the patient of the potential dental damage will diminish costs for any related postoperative dental treatment. Upon discovery of a potentially hazardous dental condition, a consultation with a dentist should be considered before proceeding with the surgical procedure. Exercising cautionary measures during provocative events, such as laryngoscopy and tracheal extubation, can aid in the prevention of dental trauma. In the event of such an injury, several management tactics can promote a swift and reasonable resolution. Establishing an increased awareness of intraoral conditions and the related perioperative risk factors may diminish the incidence of dental damage and financial costs.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/etiología , Traumatismos de los Dientes/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anestesia General/economía , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Concienciación , Niño , Diagnóstico Bucal , Documentación , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Incidencia , Responsabilidad Legal , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Satisfacción del Paciente , Atención Perioperativa , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/economía , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/patología , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/prevención & control , Traumatismos de los Dientes/economía , Traumatismos de los Dientes/patología , Traumatismos de los Dientes/prevención & controlAsunto(s)
Servicio Odontológico Hospitalario/economía , Honorarios Odontológicos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/cirugía , Servicio Odontológico Hospitalario/estadística & datos numéricos , Georgia (República) , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Odontología Estatal/economía , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/economíaAsunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Dental/economía , Beneficios del Seguro/economía , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/economía , Femenino , Guías como Asunto , Política de Salud/economía , Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Política de Salud/tendencias , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Beneficios del Seguro/legislación & jurisprudencia , Beneficios del Seguro/tendencias , Cobertura del Seguro/legislación & jurisprudencia , Seguro de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/terapia , Anomalías Dentarias/economía , Anomalías Dentarias/terapia , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Determining the magnitude of the burden of diseases and health disorders on the U.S. population is a high priority for health policy makers. Conditions such as malignant neoplasms and injuries from craniofacial trauma contribute to adverse oral health. This study estimates the number of cases of diseases and disorders relevant to oral health that are treated annually in the medical care, as opposed to the dental care, system and associated costs. Policy makers can use this cost model to compare the impact of different conditions, to target areas for reducing costs, and to allocate appropriate health resources. METHODS: Data from four national and two state data systems were used to estimate the number of cases of selected dental, oral, and craniofacial diseases and conditions treated in the medical system annually and associated medical and wage/household work loss costs. RESULTS: Per case, the most costly conditions were estimated to be malignant neoplasms at 83,080 US dollars annually (in 1999 dollars), diabetes-related oral conditions at 51,030 US dollars, endocarditis at 48,610 US dollars, and chlamydiae at 41,100 US dollars. Total estimated costs for oral conditions treated in the medical care system in 1996 were approximately 95.9 billion US dollars, including 21.4 billion US dollars in medical costs and 74.4 US dollars billion in wage/household work loss costs. CONCLUSIONS: Conditions treated outside the dental care system are major contributors to oral health costs. They should be an important focus for the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research.
Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/economía , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/clasificación , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/complicaciones , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/epidemiología , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Salud Bucal , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/clasificación , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/complicaciones , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the following parameters in a referral-based private practice oral and maxillofacial pathology clinic: (1) sources of clinical referrals; (2) types of problems referred; and (3) clinical effectiveness of treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical charts were reviewed for a cohort of 362 patients seen over a 2 1/2-year period (1993-1995). From these charts, we determined the source of referral and the final diagnosis for each patient. In addition, 50 patients were randomly selected and surveyed by telephone; each was asked a series of questions to determine the following: (1) the number of health care practitioners previously seen with regard to the patient's condition; (2) the length of time that the condition had been present before the patient came to the oral and maxillofacial pathology clinic; (3) the costs associated with medications and office visits that had been incurred before the patient came to the oral and maxillofacial pathology clinic; (4) the costs associated with medications and office visits that were incurred at the oral and maxillofacial pathology clinic; and (5) the patient's level of satisfaction with the oral and maxillofacial pathology clinic. RESULTS: Fifty-five percent of the referrals came from dentists, and 45% came from physicians. The 3 problems most commonly seen were candidiasis (12%), burning mouth syndrome (10%), and lichen planus (8%). For the 50 patients who were interviewed, the mean number of health care practitioners seen previously was 2.2 (range, 1-9). The mean time from initial symptoms to evaluation by an oral pathologist was 15 months. The mean approximate cost of medications and office visits before evaluation by an oral pathologist was $350 (range, $30-$4,000; median, $100); this compared with a cost of $94 (range, $50-$300; median, $70) for the patient visit and medications associated with the oral pathology appointment. The difference was statistically significant (P < or = .001). CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study suggests that the clinical evaluation of oral lesions by an oral pathologist appears to be cost-effective and should be an integral part of a comprehensive health management system. These results should be corroborated by similar multicenter studies.
Asunto(s)
Patología Bucal/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Especialización/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Demografía , Episodio de Atención , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Patología Bucal/economía , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Odontología/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Muestreo , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study identified potential risk factors associated with increasing hospital length of stay (LOS) in patients with odontogenic maxillofacial infections. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-eight patients admitted to Brigham and Women's Hospital by the Division of Oral Surgery between October 1, 1984 and March 31, 1995 with a maxillofacial infection of dental origin were retrospectively identified by a medical chart review. Linear regression techniques were used to explain the relationship between patient admission characteristics and LOS. Variables considered included age, gender, infection location, admission white blood count (WBC), admission temperature, antibiotic treatment during hospitalization, attending surgeon, insurance class, operating room use (ORU), and preexisting medical conditions associated with chronic immunosuppression. RESULTS: The following variables were found to significantly increase LOS: ORU (P = .007), preexisting medical conditions (P < .0001), admission temperature (P = .022), and deep infection (P = .063). CONCLUSION: LOS is best predicted on the basis of underlying medical conditions and location of the infection.