Hyperbaric oxygen treatment in bilateral orchiopexy and post-circumcision haematoma in a thrombocytopenic patient with Noonan syndrome.

Hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) can be utilised for necrotising soft tissue infections, clostridial myonecrosis (gas gangrene), crush injuries, acute traumatic ischaemia, delayed wound healing, and compromised skin grafts. Our case was a 17-month-old male patient with Noonan syndrome, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, and bilateral undescended testicles. Haematoma and oedema developed in the scrotum and penis the day after bilateral orchiopexy and circumcision. Ischaemic appearances were observed on the penile and scrotal skin on the second postoperative day. Enoxaparin sodium and fresh frozen plasma were started on the recommendation of haematology. Hyperbaric oxygen treatment was initiated considering the possibility of tissue necrosis. We observed rapid healing within five days. We present this case to emphasise that HBOT may be considered as an additional treatment option in patients with similar conditions. To our knowledge, no similar cases have been reported in the literature.

Pulmonary venous thrombosis in a healthy pregnancy.

We describe an unusual case of bilateral pulmonary venous thrombosis in a pregnant woman in her mid 30s, who presented at 34 weeks of gestation with symptoms of sudden onset chest pain, shortness of breath and near syncope attacks. The patient was treated with enoxaparin and made an excellent clinical and hemodynamic recovery.

Effect of Enoxaparin on D-dimer levels in hospitalized Corona Virus patients with a comparison of its level in patients with comorbid conditions.

OBJECTIVE: Aim: The main goal is to assess the levels of comorbid diseases and examine the changes in D-dimer in hospitalized patients before and following SC enoxaparin medication. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Material and Methods: At the Al-Yarmouk Teaching Hospital in Baghdad, Iraq, from October 2022 to May 2023, 86 patients who were hospitalized and had severe to critical COVID-19 infections provided data for a retrospective analysis. RESULTS: Results: The medical records of all COVID-19 patients who were hospitalized and whose D-dimer level was greater than 0.5 mg/l and who were given enoxaparin (40 mg subcutaneously) were reviewed with the requisite authorization from the relevant authorities. The D-dimer level was assessed following therapy on the day of admission and day five after commencing enoxaparin. An examination of 86 case records revealed that persons with COVID-19 had significantly decreased D-dimer levels after taking subcutaneous enoxaparin (p-value<0.0001). The comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, hypertension) of patients who received the drug were compared. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Enoxaparin and other anticoagulants were utilized to treat the coagulopathy brought on by COVID-19. Low molecular weight heparin enoxaparin has demonstrated positive outcomes in the management of VTE. A decrease in D-dimer level is anticipated when COVID-19 patients are treated with subcutaneous enoxaparin, partly because decreased coagulation results in lower fibrin formation.

Validation of the Safety and Efficacy of Apixaban as Postoperative Thromboembolism Prophylaxis for Patients with Gynecologic Malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism is a preventable complication of gynecologic cancer surgery that leads to postoperative morbidity and mortality. This study compared apixaban with enoxaparin to identify whether apixaban had the same safety and efficacy for patients undergoing gynecologic cancer surgery. METHODS: The study identified patients with a gynecologic malignancy who underwent surgery and were prescribed apixaban at discharge between June 2020 and April 2023. International Classification of Diseases 10 codes were used to identify patients who had a thromboembolism within 90 days or a bleeding event within 60 days after surgery. The rates of events for patients prescribed apixaban were compared with those for a historical cohort of patients who received enoxaparin. Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical variables, and t tests were used to compare continuous variables. A logistic regression was performed to compare the odds of thromboembolism between the two groups. RESULTS: Baseline patient characteristics differed in terms of body mass index (BMI), race, route of surgery, and type of cancer. Of the 490 patients in the apixaban cohort, 12 (2.4%) had a thromboembolism compared with 3 (2.1%) of the 138 patients in the enoxaparin group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-4.70; p > 0.999). The odds ratio was adjusted for BMI, age, and route of surgery. A bleeding event occurred for 1 (0.2%) of the 490 patients in the apixaban group and for 1 (0.7%) of the 138 patients in the enoxaparin group. CONCLUSIONS: This validation study showed that apixaban is a safe and effective method of postoperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. The data provide support to previous data and guideline updates recommending the use of apixaban for postoperative prophylaxis.

The influence of perioperative enoxaparin on bleeding after TORS oropharyngectomy.

Perioperative enoxaparin is often avoided in patients undergoing transoral robotic (TORS) oropharyngectomy. Our goal was to quantify the risk of postoperative hemorrhage (POH) in patients receiving enoxaparin after TORS oropharyngectomy. This was a retrospective database cohort study set up in 89 separate healthcare organizations. The TriNetX electronic database was queried for patients with OPSCC who underwent TORS oropharyngectomy. Propensity-score matching was used to create two cohorts, one receiving and one not receiving perioperative enoxaparin. Outcome measures were the POH rate within 1 day of surgery ("primary") and POH rate within 2-30 days of surgery ("secondary"). 1109 patients undergoing TORS for OPSCC were identified, 400 of which received perioperative enoxaparin. One-to-one propensity score matching resulted in 310 patients per cohort. After matching, the primary POH rates between patients receiving and not receiving enoxaparin were 3.23% for both cohorts (OR 1.000, 95% CI 0.410 to 2.438). The secondary POH rates between those receiving and not receiving enoxaparin were 5.47% vs. 3.54% (OR 1.577, 95% CI 0.726 to 3.424). The number needed to harm (NNH) with perioperative enoxaparin use for secondary POH after TORS was 53; no difference was found in primary POH rates. While not statistically significant, the use of perioperative enoxaparin after TORS is associated with increased odds of secondary POH with a NNH of 53; no difference was found in rates of primary POH. For patients undergoing TORS, enoxaparin use requires careful weighing of the risks and benefits.

Equivalent thrombotic risk with Warfarin, Dabigatran, or Enoxaparin after failure of initial direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) therapy.

BACKGROUND: The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are now commonly regarded as first line anticoagulants in most cases of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the optimal choice of subsequent anticoagulant in instances of first line DOAC failure is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare outcomes with second line anticoagulants used after DOAC failure. METHODS: Patients seen at an urban hospital system for an episode of acute VTE initially treated with either apixaban or rivaroxaban who experienced a subsequent recurrent thrombosis while on anticoagulation (1st recurrent thrombosis) were included. RESULTS: In total, 166 patients after apixaban or rivaroxaban failure were included. Following DOAC failure (1st recurrent thrombosis), the subsequent anticoagulant was warfarin in 60 patients (36%), dabigatran in 42 patients (25%), and enoxaparin in 64 patients (39%). Enoxaparin was preferentially prescribed in patients with a malignancy-associated etiology for 1st recurrent thrombosis (p < 0.01). The median follow-up time in our cohort was 16 months. There was no difference in 2nd recurrent thrombosis-free survival (p = 0.72) or risk for major bleeding event (p = 0.30) among patients treated with dabigatran, warfarin, or enoxaparin. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis of patients failing first line DOAC therapy, rates of 2nd recurrent thrombosis and bleeding did not differ among subsequently chosen anticoagulants. Our study provides evidence that the optimal 2nd anticoagulant is not clear, and the choice of 2nd anticoagulant should continue to balance patient preference, cost, and provider experience.

Structured benefit-risk assessment for enoxaparin, in the context of its label extension, for the extended treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and prevention of its recurrence in patients with active cancer.

PURPOSE: Guidelines recommend low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) for patients with cancer-associated thrombosis. However, until recently, only dalteparin and tinzaparin were approved in the European Economic Area (EEA) for these patients. This study compares the benefit-risk profile of enoxaparin with dalteparin and tinzaparin for the extended treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), and prevention of recurrence in adult patients with active cancer. METHODS: A semi-quantitative structured benefit-risk assessment was conducted for the label-extension application of enoxaparin based on the benefit-risk action team descriptive framework: define decision context; determine key benefit and risk outcomes; identify data sources; extract data; interpret results. RESULTS: The key benefits were defined as reduced all-cause mortality and venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence (including symptomatic DVT, fatal PE or non-fatal PE); the key risks were major and non-major bleeding of clinical significance, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Enoxaparin demonstrated comparable effects for the reduction of VTE recurrence and all-cause mortality versus other EEA-approved LMWHs (dalteparin, tinzaparin). There was no evidence of a significant difference between enoxaparin and the comparator groups with regard to incidence of major and non-major bleeding. The data on HIT were too limited to assess the difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment demonstrated a favourable benefit-risk profile for enoxaparin similar to that of other EEA-approved LMWHs for the treatment of DVT and PE and the prevention of recurrence in patients with active cancer and thus supported the label-extension approval.

Warfarin dosage in a postpartum woman while breastfeeding: A case report.

Warfarin is the only oral anticoagulant recommended in women who are breastfeeding. Although warfarin is a compatible and recommended agent in the postpartum period and during lactation, little is known regarding changes to warfarin dose requirements in this patient population. Here, we report the case of a 40-year-old woman who transitioned from enoxaparin monotherapy back to warfarin at 2 months postpartum, while she was breastfeeding. Despite resuming warfarin at her previously therapeutic dose, her international normalized ratio (INR) remained subtherapeutic and required multiple dose increases. She ultimately required a 100% increase in her warfarin dose postpartum, compared to pre-pregnancy, to achieve a therapeutic INR. This case suggests patients may require higher warfarin doses postpartum, compared to pre-pregnancy, especially if breastfeeding. Clinicians should closely monitor these patients and adjust warfarin doses as necessary.

Prophylaxis of microvascular thrombosis using direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in microvascular free tissue transplantation - a pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: We conducted this pilot study to assess direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the prevention of microvascular thrombosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five patients undergoing microvascular free tissue transplantation received rivaroxaban or apixaban (depending on their home medication). We compared this group to 19 patients who received enoxaparin subcutaneously. We evaluated the rate of graft loss due to microvascular thrombosis and the number of transfusions administered intra- and postoperatively. RESULTS: There was no graft loss due to microvascular thrombosis in either of the groups. There was no significant difference in the number of intraoperative (study group mean 1.00 (SE 0.32) vs. control group mean 1.11 (SE 0.59); p = 0.876) and postoperative (study group mean 1.2 (SE 0.37) vs. control group mean 1.74 (SE 0.34); p = 0.310) red blood cell transfusions. CONCLUSION: Based on our results in this pilot study, DOACs can be used with microvascular flaps. Further studies with larger sample sizes should be performed to find an optimal medication regimen both for patients already taking DOACs and perhaps even for those not taking DOACs.

Comparison of enoxaparin 40 mg versus 60 mg dosage for venous thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing bariatric surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality after bariatric surgery. Morbid obesity is an independent risk factor for VTE, with goals of prophylactic anti-factor Xa levels within 0.2-0.5 IU/mL. The recommended dosing regimen of enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis in patients with morbid obesity is lacking in available guidelines. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the achieving prophylactic anti-factor Xa levels with different dosages of enoxaparin for morbid obesity patients. SETTING: We conducted a study at Chulalongkorn Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing anti-factor Xa levels 4 h after the administration of enoxaparin. All recruited patients randomly received 40 mg or 60 mg of enoxaparin 12 h before the operation. Blood specimens were collected 4 h after the administration of enoxaparin. RESULTS: In total, 56 patients who presented between April 2019 and March 2020 at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital were recruited. Of these patients, 28 received 40 mg and 28 received 60 mg of enoxaparin. In both groups, the rates of achieving target levels were 53.57% and 78.57%, respectively (p-value = 0.048). The mean anti-factor Xa levels were 0.19 IU/mL ± 0.06 IU/mL and 0.28 and 0.28 ± 0.10 IU/mL, respectively (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found in the estimated blood loss between the groups. No patient obtained anti-factor Xa levels exceeding 0.5 IU/mL. In both groups, no symptomatic VTE occurred. CONCLUSIONS: A 60 mg of enoxaparin regimen achieved more prophylactic anti-factor Xa levels than 40 mg in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery without any adverse events.

Weight-Based Dosing for Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin (Enoxaparin) Administration to Achieve Optimal VTE Prophylaxis in Trauma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Patients admitted after traumatic injuries are at high risk for developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is commonly used to prevent VTE in this patient population; however, the optimal dosing strategy has yet to be determined. To address this question, a fixed-dosing strategy of LMWH was compared to a weight-based dosing strategy of LMWH for VTE prophylaxis. METHODS: A retrospective, pre-post implementation cohort study compared a fixed vs a weight-based dosing strategy of LMWH for VTE prophylaxis. Patients admitted to our level 1 trauma center were included if they had an estimated glomerular filtration rate >30 mL/min/1.73 m2, received at least 3 doses of LMWH, and had an appropriately drawn anti-Xa level on their initial dosing regimen. Patients in the pre-cohort received 30 mg LMWH subcutaneously twice daily as the initial dosing regimen. Patients in the post-cohort received .5 mg/kg (max 60 mg) LMWH subcutaneously every 12 h as the initial dosing regimen. A goal anti-Xa of .2-.4 IU/mL was targeted for prophylaxis. RESULTS: There were 817 patients in the fixed-dosing group (FDG) and 874 patients in the weight-based dosing group (WBDG). In the FDG, 42.8% of the patients achieved the goal initial anti-Xa level, with 54.1% and 3.1% reaching sub- and supratherapeutic doses, respectively. In the WBDG, 66.5% of patients reached goal initial anti-Xa levels, with 23.5% and 10.1% at sub- and supratherapeutic levels. The distribution of dose ranges was significantly different between the dosing strategies (P-value <.001). There was no difference in the number of patients who received blood products (39.1% vs 41.7%. P-value = .299). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, weight-based dosing of LMWH yielded a significantly higher proportion of patients who achieved goal prophylactic anti-Xa levels than fixed-dosing of LMWH. Larger-scale studies are needed to assess the risk of VTE events and bleeding with these dosing strategies.

Prophylactic Enoxaparin Dosing Using Anti-Factor Xa Levels in Hepatic Surgery Patients: A Pilot Study.

This study examines the safety and efficacy of using peak anti-Xa levels to achieve prophylactic enoxaparin (Lovenox, Sanofi-Aventis) levels in patients who underwent hepatic surgery. Prospectively enrolled patients undergoing major and minor hepatic procedures received postoperative enoxaparin dosing. The enoxaparin dose was adjusted to attain a peak anti-Xa level ≥ 0.20 U/ml. This group was compared to a historical cohort of patients who underwent similar procedures and received standard postoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis dosing. Inpatient postoperative VTE rates were higher in the control group when compared to the experimental group (0 patients [0.00%] vs 4 patients [8.16%]; P = .035). There was no statistically significant difference in number of postoperative blood transfusions, discharge hemoglobin, or in-hospital bleeding events. Adjusting enoxaparin dosing to achieve prophylactic peak anti-Xa levels of ≥0.20 IU/ml was associated with a reduced incidence of symptomatic inpatient postoperative VTE in patients who underwent hepatic surgery without increasing postoperative bleeding events.

Efficacy, safety, and feasibility of Apixaban for postoperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis following open gynecologic cancer surgery at a comprehensive cancer center.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate safety, efficacy, and feasibility of apixaban for postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following open gynecologic cancer surgery at a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: This retrospective, cohort study included patients with gynecologic cancer who underwent open surgery between 3/2021 and 3/2023 and received 28-day postoperative VTE prophylaxis. Patients on therapeutic anticoagulation preoperatively were excluded. Predictors of 90- and 30-day VTE and 30-day bleeding events were determined using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for known confounders. RESULTS: 452 patients were included in the cohort: 348 received apixaban and 104 received enoxaparin. Those who received enoxaparin were more likely to be American Society of Anesthesiologists class III/IV (compared to I/II) (p = 0.033), current or former smokers (p = 0.012) and have a higher BMI (p < 0.001), Charlson Comorbidity Index (p = 0.005), and age (p = 0.046). 30-day VTE rate was significantly lower in the apixaban group (0.6%) compared to the enoxaparin group (6.2%) (adjusted OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.56; p = 0.006). 90-day VTE rate was 2.7% and 6.2% in the apixaban and enoxaparin groups, respectively (adjusted OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.38-1.92; p = 0.704). Major bleeding complications (2.4% vs. 2.0%) and minor bleeding complications (0.9% vs. 3.0%) were similar in the apixaban and enoxaparin groups, respectively, on multivariate analyses. The median patient out of pocket cost was $10 (IQR 0.0-40.0) for apixaban and $20 (IQR 3.7-67.7) for enoxaparin (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings along with previously published data suggest that apixaban should be considered the standard of care for VTE prophylaxis in patients undergoing open surgery for gynecologic malignancies.

Comparison of the safety and efficacy for different regimens of pharmaco-prophylaxis among severely burned patients: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in critically ill patients, including severe burn cases. Burn patients respond differently to medications due to pharmacokinetic changes. This study aims to assess the feasibility and safety of different VTE pharmaco-prophylaxis in patients admitted to the ICU with severe burns. METHODS: A pilot, open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted on ICU patients with severe burns (BSA ≥ 20%). By using block randomization, patients were allocated to receive high-dose enoxaparin 30 mg q12hours (E30q12), standard-dose enoxaparin 40 mg q24hours (E40q24), or unfractionated heparin (UFH) 5000 Units q8hours. In this study, the primary outcomes assessed were the recruitment and consent rates, as well as bleeding or hematoma at both the donor and graft site. Additionally, secondary measures were evaluated to provide further insights. RESULTS: Twenty adult patients out of 114 screened were enrolled and received E30q12 (40%), E40q24 (30%), and UFH (30%). The recruitment rate was one patient per month with a 100% consent rate. Donor site bleeding occurred in one patient (16.7%) in the UFH group. On the other hand, graft site bleeding was only reported in one patient (12.5%) who received E30q12. Major bleeding happened in two patients, one in E30q12 and one in the UFH group. Five patients (25.0%) had minor bleeding; two patients (25.0%) received E30q12, two patients E40q24, and one patient UFH. RBC transfusion was needed in four patients, two on E30q12 and two on UFH. Only one patient had VTE, while four patients died in the hospital. CONCLUSION: The study observed a low recruitment rate but a high consent rate. Furthermore, there were no major safety concerns identified with any of the three pharmacologic prophylaxis regimens that were evaluated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05237726.

Prophylactic anticoagulation after minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine our institutional rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer and to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of extended prophylactic anticoagulation after minimally invasive staging surgery for endometrial cancer. METHODS: All patients with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer who underwent minimally invasive staging surgery from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2020 were identified retrospectively, and clinicopathologic and outcome data were obtained through chart review. Event probabilities and utility decrements were obtained through published clinical data and literature review. A decision model was created to compare 28 days of no post-operative pharmacologic prophylaxis, prophylactic enoxaparin, and prophylactic apixaban. Outcomes included no complications, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, and major bleeding. We assumed a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. RESULTS: Three of 844 patients (0.36%) had a VTE following minimally invasive staging surgery for endometrial cancer. In this model, no pharmacologic prophylaxis was less costly and more effective than prophylactic apixaban and prophylactic enoxaparin over all parameters examined. When all patients were assigned prophylaxis, prophylactic apixaban was both less costly and more effective than prophylactic enoxaparin. If the risk of DVT was ≥4.8%, prophylactic apixaban was favored over no pharmacologic prophylaxis. On Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis for the base case scenario, no pharmacologic prophylaxis was favored in 41.1% of iterations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: In this cost-effectiveness model, no extended pharmacologic anticoagulation was superior to extended prophylactic enoxaparin and apixaban in clinically early-stage endometrial cancer patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery. This model supports use of prophylactic apixaban for 7 days post-operatively in select patients when the risk of DVT is 4.8% or higher.

Efficacy and safety of salvianolate and enoxaparin in the prevention of perioperative deep venous thrombosis in gastrointestinal surgery.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, the efficacy and safety of salvianolate were compared with enoxaparin in the prevention of perioperative deep vein thrombosis in gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS: From October 2017 to September 2019, 563 patients who underwent gastrointestinal surgery were collected. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 119 patients were divided into two groups: enoxaparin group (n = 65) and salvianolate group (n = 54). Comparisons were made regarding the outcomes: prothrombin time (PT), prothrombin activity (PTA), international normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), fibrinogen (FIB), thrombin time (TT), D-dimer level (D-D), platelet count (PLT), hematokrit (HCT), and incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). RESULTS: The main outcomes showed no significance between enoxaparin group and salvianolate group (p > .05). The incidence of DVT in salvianolate group was 1.85%, significantly lower than that in enoxaparin group (12.3%) (p < .05). No serious adverse reactions occurred in the two groups during treatment. CONCLUSION: Compared with enoxaparin, salvianolate has an advantage in the prevention of perioperative thrombosis in gastrointestinal surgery with a lower incidence of DVT.

Superior ophthalmic vein and cavernous sinus thrombosis associated with COVID-19: a case report / Trombose de veia oftálmica superior e seio cavernoso associada à COVID-19: relato de caso

ABSTRACT Cavernous sinus and superior ophthalmic vein thrombosis is a rare clinical condition, and little described in the literature. The clinical presentation is nonspecific and highly variable, and symptoms may include red eye, ophthalmoplegia, coma, and death. The main etiology results from infection of the paranasal sinuses. The final diagnosis must be made through imaging tests such as magnetic resonance imaging. We describe a case of cavernous sinus and superior ophthalmic vein thrombosis after COVID-19 infection in a 64-year-old patient with persistent ocular hyperemia and pain on eye movement. Ophthalmological examination showed preserved visual acuity, conjunctival hyperemia, dilation of episcleral vessels and retinal vascular tortuosity in the right eye. Magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the diagnosis. The association with the COVID-19 was raised, excluding other infectious causes. Enoxaparin and Warfarin were started with significant improvement in the ocular clinical presentation and maintenance of initial visual acuity after 12 months of follow-up.

RESUMO A trombose de seio cavernoso e veia oftálmica superior é uma condição clínica rara e pouco descrita na literatura. A apresentação clínica é inespecífica e altamente variável. Os sintomas podem incluir olho vermelho, oftalmoplegia, coma e morte. A etiologia principal resulta da infecção dos seios paranasais. O diagnóstico final deve ser efetuado por meio de exames de imagem, como ressonância magnética. Descrevemos um caso de trombose de seio cavernoso e veia oftálmica superior após COVID-19 em paciente de 64 anos e com quadro de hiperemia ocular persistente e dor à movimentação ocular. Ao exame oftalmológico, observou-se acuidade visual preservada, hiperemia conjuntival, dilatação de vasos episclerais e tortuosidade vascular retiniana em olho direito. A ressonância confirmou o diagnóstico. A associação com a COVID-19 foi levantada, excluindo-se demais causas infecciosas. Prescrevemos enoxaparina e varfarina, com melhora do quadro clínico ocular e manutenção da acuidade visual inicial após 12 meses de acompanhamento.

Síndrome inflamatorio multisistémico asociado a COVID-19: a propósito de un caso clínico con fenotipo shock e íleo paralítico / Multisystem inflammatory syndrome associated with COVID-19: clinical case with shock phenotype and paralytic ileus / Síndrome inflamatória multissistêmica associada à COVID-19: relato de caso com fenótipo de choque e íleo paralítico

La enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) causada por la infección por SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) se ha extendido por todo el mundo desde diciembre de 2019. Luego de la primera ola de COVID-19, se reporta por primera vez en mayo de 2020 en el Reino Unido un estado hiperinflamatorio asociado temporalmente a la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en un grupo de niños ingresados a unidades de cuidado intensivo pediátrico. Este nuevo fenotipo, con características similares a la enfermedad de Kawasaki y al síndrome del shock tóxico, se ha denominado síndrome inflamatorio multisistémico en niños (MIS-C). Es fundamental la sospecha y el reconocimiento tempranos de esta entidad, con el fin de ofrecer un tratamiento médico oportuno, para prevenir la muerte y el desarrollo de secuelas. Presentamos el caso de una preescolar de 5 años, en la que se realizó diagnóstico de MIS-C con un fenotipo shock e íleo paralítico.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the infection by SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) has spread worldwide since December 2019. After the first wave of COVID-19, a hyperinflammatory condition temporarily associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection appeared in a group of children admitted to pediatric intensive care units and reported for the first time in May 2020 in the United Kingdom. This new phenotype shared characteristics with the Kawasaki disease and toxic shock syndrome and has been called multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). Early suspicion and recognition of this condition is key in order to offer timely medical treatment to prevent death and the development of sequelae. We present the case of a 5-year-old child, in which diagnosis of MIS-C with a shock phenotype and paralytic ileus.

A doença de coronavírus 2019 (COVID-19) causada pela infecção por SARS-CoV-2 (síndrome respiratória aguda grave coronavírus 2) se espalhou pelo mundo desde dezembro de 2019. Após a primeira onda de COVID-19, houve relatos pela primeira vez em maio de 2020 no Reino Unido duma doença hiperinflamatória temporariamente associada à infecção por SARS-CoV-2 num grupo de crianças internadas em unidades de terapia intensiva pediátrica. Esse novo fenótipo com características semelhantes à doença de Kawasaki e a síndrome do choque tóxico foi chamado de síndrome inflamatória multissistêmica em crianças (MIS-C). A suspeita precoce e o reconhecimento dessa entidade são essenciais, a fim de oferecer tratamento médico oportuno, para prevenir a morte e o desenvolvimento de sequelas. Apresentamos o caso de uma menina pré-escolar de 5 anos que foi diagnosticada com MIS-C com fenótipo de choque e íleo paralítico.