Prevalence of Suicidality in Adolescents With Newly Diagnosed Focal Epilepsy at Diagnosis and Over the Following 36 Months.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Individuals with epilepsy have increased risk of suicidal ideation (SI) and behaviors when compared with the general population. This relationship has remained largely unexplored in adolescents. We investigated the prevalence of suicidality in adolescents with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy within 4 months of treatment initiation and over the following 36 months. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of the enrollment and follow-up data from the Human Epilepsy Project, an international, multi-institutional study that enrolled participants between 2012 and 2017. Participants enrolled were 11-17 years of age within 4 months of treatment initiation for focal epilepsy. We used data from the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), administered at enrollment and over the 36-month follow-up period, along with data from medical records. RESULTS: A total of 66 adolescent participants were enrolled and completed the C-SSRS. At enrollment, 14 (21%) had any lifetime SI and 5 (8%) had any lifetime suicidal behaviors (SBs). Over the following 36 months, 6 adolescents reported new onset SI and 5 adolescents reported new onset SB. Thus, the lifetime prevalence of SI within this population increased from 21% to 30% (14-20 adolescents), and the lifetime prevalence of SB increased from 8% to 15% (5-10). DISCUSSION: The prevalence of suicidality in adolescents with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy reported in our study is consistent with previous findings of significant suicidality observed in epilepsy. We identify adolescents as an at-risk population at the time of epilepsy diagnosis and in the following years.

EEG in focal and generalized epilepsies: Pearls and perils.

Correctly diagnosing and classifying seizures and epilepsies is vital to ensure a tailored approach to patients with epilepsy. The ILAE seizure classification consists of two main groups: focal and generalized. Establishing if a seizure is focal or generalized is essential to classify the epilepsy type and the epilepsy syndrome, providing more personalized treatment and counseling about prognosis. EEG is one of the most essential tools for this classification process and further localization of the epileptogenic focus. However, some EEG findings are misleading and may postpone the correct diagnosis and proper treatment. Knowing the most common EEG pitfalls in focal and generalized epilepsies is valuable for clinical practice, avoiding misinterpretations. Some atypical features can be challenging in focal epilepsies, such as secondary bilateral synchrony, focal epileptiform activity induced by hyperventilation and photic stimulation, and non-focal slowing. On the other hand, more than 60 % of persons with idiopathic generalized epilepsies have at least one type of atypical abnormality. In this manuscript, we describe and illustrate some of the most common EEG findings that can make even experienced epileptologists question not only where the epileptogenic focus is but also if the patient has focal or generalized epilepsy. This review summarizes the perils and provide some pearls to assist EEG readers.

Identifying epileptogenic abnormality by decomposing intracranial EEG and MEG power spectra.

BACKGROUND: Accurate identification of abnormal electroencephalographic (EEG) activity is pivotal for diagnosing and treating epilepsy. Recent studies indicate that decomposing brain activity into periodic (oscillatory) and aperiodic (trend across all frequencies) components can illuminate the drivers of spectral activity changes. NEW METHODS: We analysed intracranial EEG (iEEG) data from 234 subjects, creating a normative map. This map was compared to a cohort of 63 patients with refractory focal epilepsy under consideration for neurosurgery. The normative map was computed using three approaches: (i) relative complete band power, (ii) relative band power with the aperiodic component removed, and (iii) the aperiodic exponent. Abnormalities were calculated for each approach in the patient cohort. We evaluated the spatial profiles, assessed their ability to localize abnormalities, and replicated the findings using magnetoencephalography (MEG). RESULTS: Normative maps of relative complete band power and relative periodic band power exhibited similar spatial profiles, while the aperiodic normative map revealed higher exponent values in the temporal lobe. Abnormalities estimated through complete band power effectively distinguished between good and bad outcome patients. Combining periodic and aperiodic abnormalities enhanced performance, like the complete band power approach. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS AND CONCLUSIONS: Sparing cerebral tissue with abnormalities in both periodic and aperiodic activity may result in poor surgical outcomes. Both periodic and aperiodic components do not carry sufficient information in isolation. The relative complete band power solution proved to be the most reliable method for this purpose. Future studies could investigate how cerebral location or pathology influences periodic or aperiodic abnormalities.

Learning difficulties often not documented in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: A previous investigation of people with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy participating in the Human Epilepsy Project 1 (HEP1) revealed an association between learning difficulties and structural brain differences, suggesting an underlying relationship prior to seizure onset. To investigate physicians' practices of documentation learning difficulties during clinical encounters, we conducted a review of initial epileptologist encounter notes from HEP1 participants who self-reported early life learning difficulties separately as part of study enrollment. METHODS: HEP1 enrolled 67 North American participants between June 2012 and November 2017 who self-reported one or more difficulties with learning (i.e., having repeated grade, receiving learning support/remediation, and/or formal diagnosis of a learning disability) prior to epilepsy diagnosis as part of the study enrollment. The epileptologist's initial encounter note was then reviewed in detail for each of these participants. Documentation of learning issues and specific diagnoses of learning disabilities was compared to participant characteristics. Regression analysis was used to test for any independent associations between participant characteristics and physician documentation of learning difficulties. RESULTS: There were significant independent relationships between age, sex, and physician documentation of learning difficulties. On average, participants ages 22 and younger were 12.12 times more likely to have their learning difficulties documented compared to those 23 years and older (95 % CI: 2.226 to 66.02, p = 0.004). Additionally, male participants had 7.2 times greater odds of having their learning difficulty documented compared to female participants (95 % CI: 1.538 to 33.717, p = 0.012). There were no significant independent associations between race, language, employment, or geographical region. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings highlight disparities in physician documentation for people with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy and a history of learning difficulties. In the HEP1 cohort, physicians were more likely to document learning difficulties in males and in younger individuals. Systematic practice standards are important for reducing healthcare disparities across populations, improving clinical care to individuals, as well as enabling more accurate retrospective study of clinical phenomenon.

Epilepsia partialis continua: A review.

Epilepsia partialis continua (EPC) is a rare type of focal motor seizure characterized by continuous, involuntary muscle contractions in a specific part of the body. These contractions usually involve rhythmic, twitching movements and can last for several hours to days. The seizures are usually limited to one part of the body and can be clonic or dystonic. EPC can affect people of all ages but is more common in children and adolescents. The pathophysiology of EPC is complex and depends on the cause. There are several possible causes of EPC including structural brain abnormalities, infections, metabolic and genetic disorders, inflammatory conditions, traumatic brain injury, and vascular causes. The work-up of EPC includes electroencephalography (EEG), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, position emission tomography (PET) scan of the brain, autoimmune antibodies, infection work-up, and metabolic and genetic work-up. The management of EPC can be challenging. Antiseizure medications (ASDs) including benzodiazepines are an integral part of the management of EPC. Immunotherapy trials are recommended in resistant cases. Epilepsy surgery is one of the effective modalities in some surgically amenable cases. This article reviews the topic of EPC and summarizes diagnostic and .treatment recommendations.

Unrecognized Focal Nonmotor Seizures in Adolescents Presenting to Emergency Departments.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many adolescents with undiagnosed focal epilepsy seek evaluation in emergency departments (EDs). Accurate history-taking is essential to prompt diagnosis and treatment. In this study, we investigated ED recognition of motor vs nonmotor seizures and its effect on management and treatment of focal epilepsy in adolescents. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of enrollment data from the Human Epilepsy Project (HEP), an international multi-institutional study that collected data from 34 sites between 2012 and 2017. Participants were 12 years or older, neurotypical, and within 4 months of treatment initiation for focal epilepsy. We used HEP enrollment medical records to review participants' initial diagnosis and management. RESULTS: A total of 83 adolescents were enrolled between 12 and 18 years. Fifty-eight (70%) presented to an ED before diagnosis of epilepsy. Although most ED presentations were for motor seizures (n = 52; 90%), many patients had a history of nonmotor seizures (20/52 or 38%). Adolescents with initial nonmotor seizures were less likely to present to EDs (26/44 or 59% vs 32/39 or 82%, p = 0.02), and nonmotor seizures were less likely to be correctly identified (2/6 or 33% vs 42/52 or 81%, p = 0.008). A history of initial nonmotor seizures was not recognized in any adolescent who presented for a first-lifetime motor seizure. As a result, initiation of treatment and admission from the ED was not more likely for these adolescents who met the definition of epilepsy compared with those with no seizure history. This lack of nonmotor seizure history recognition in the ED was greater than that observed in the adult group (0% vs 23%, p = 0.03) and occurred in both pediatric and nonpediatric ED settings. DISCUSSION: Our study supports growing evidence that nonmotor seizures are often undiagnosed, with many individuals coming to attention only after conversion to motor seizures. We found this treatment gap is exacerbated in the adolescent population. Our study highlights a critical need for physicians to inquire about the symptoms of nonmotor seizures, even when the presenting seizure is motor. Future interventions should focus on improving nonmotor seizure recognition for this population in EDs.

New stimulation procedures for language mapping in stereo-EEG.

OBJECTIVE: Cortical intracerebral electrical stimulation is an important tool for language mapping in the presurgical work-up of patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Language mapping with stereo-electroencephalography (EEG) is usually performed by high-frequency stimulations (HFS: 50 Hz), whereas low-frequency stimulations (LFS: 1 Hz) are usually considered useful for primary cortices mapping. Little is known in literature about "intermediate" frequencies (IFS: 6-15 Hz). Our objective is to explore the clinical usefulness of IFS in language mapping and identify factors, beyond the electrical parameters, that impact the mapping. METHODS: We studied 23 patients submitted to stereo-EEG for presurgical evaluation. Language mapping was performed in the anterior, posterior and/or basal language region of the dominant hemisphere for language. We included all contact positions within these regions stimulated by HFS (50 Hz, 5 s, 1-3 mA) and IFS (6-15 Hz, 15 s, 5 mA). We compared the capability of both stimulation methods to induce a language deficit without afterdischarges (ADs), and we analyzed factors related to clinical examination, region, and stimulation technique by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 211 stimulations (98 HFS, 113 IFS) in 70 cortical sites within the anterior (84 stimulations), posterior (137), and basal language region (60) were included. IFS induced more frequently language deficits not associated to AD compared to HFS (37.1% vs 25.7%, p = .0043), whereas HFS provoked more diffuse AD (34.7% vs 15.0%, p = .001). Investigating multiple language functions increased the probability of revealing a deficit (odds ratio [OR] 3.16, p = .0016), independently of the stimulation method. SIGNIFICANCE: IFS are valuable for language mapping, thereby improving the probability of inducing a clinical deficit not accompanied by an AD. The completeness of the clinical examination independently affects the sensitivity of the mapping. IFS are a new tool with potential usefulness for the cortical mapping of other associative cortical regions.

Ictal fast activity chirps as markers of the epileptogenic zone.

The identification of the epileptogenic zone (EZ) boundaries is crucial for effective focal epilepsy surgery. We verify the value of a neurophysiological biomarker of focal ictogenesis, characterized by a low-voltage fast-activity ictal pattern (chirp) recorded with intracerebral electrodes during invasive presurgical monitoring (stereoelectroencephalography [SEEG]). The frequency content of SEEG signals was retrospectively analyzed with semiautomatic software in 176 consecutive patients with focal epilepsies that either were cryptogenic or presented with discordant anatomoelectroclinical findings. Fast activity seizure patterns with the spectrographic features of chirps were confirmed by computer-assisted analysis in 95.4% of patients who presented with heterogeneous etiologies and diverse lobar location of the EZ. Statistical analysis demonstrated (1) correlation between seizure outcome and concordance of sublobar regions included in the EZ defined by visual analysis and chirp-generating regions, (2) high concordance in contact-by contact analysis of 68 patients with Engel class Ia outcome, and (3) that discordance between chirp location and the visually outlined EZ correlated with worse seizure outcome. Seizure outcome analysis confirms the fast activity chirp pattern is a reproducible biomarker of the EZ in a heterogeneous group of patients undergoing SEEG.

Using scalp EEG to predict seizure recurrence and electrical status epilepticus in children with idiopathic focal epilepsy.

PURPOSE: Some individuals with idiopathic focal epilepsy (IFE) experience recurring seizures accompanied by the evolution of electrical status epilepticus during sleep (ESES). Here, we aimed to develop a predictor for the early detection of seizure recurrence with ESES in children with IFE using resting state electroencephalogram (EEG) data. METHODS: The study group included 15 IFE patients who developed seizure recurrence with ESES. There were 17 children in the control group who did not experience seizure recurrence with ESES during at least 2-year follow-up. We used the degree value of the partial directed coherence (PDC) from the EEG data to predict seizure recurrence with ESES via 6 machine learning (ML) algorithms. RESULTS: Among the models, the Xgboost Classifier (XGBC) model achieved the highest specificity of 0.90, and a remarkable sensitivity and accuracy of 0.80 and 0.85, respectively. The CATC showed balanced performance with a specificity of 0.85, sensitivity of 0.73, and an accuracy of 0.80, with an AUC equal to 0.78. For both of these models, F4, Fz and T4 were the overlaps of the top 4 features. CONCLUSIONS: Considering its high classification accuracy, the XGBC model is an effective and quantitative tool for predicting seizure recurrence with ESES evolution in IFE patients. We developed an ML-based tool for predicting the development of IFE using resting state EEG data. This could facilitate the diagnosis and treatment of patients with IFE.

Attention-based deep convolutional neural network for classification of generalized and focal epileptic seizures.

Epilepsy affects over 50 million people globally. Electroencephalography is critical for epilepsy diagnosis, but manual seizure classification is time-consuming and requires extensive expertise. This paper presents an automated multi-class seizure classification model using EEG signals from the Temple University Hospital Seizure Corpus ver. 1.5.2. 11 features including time-based correlation, time-based eigenvalues, power spectral density, frequency-based correlation, frequency-based eigenvalues, sample entropy, spectral entropy, logarithmic sum, standard deviation, absolute mean, and ratio of Daubechies D4 wavelet transformed coefficients were extracted from 10-second sliding windows across channels. The model combines multi-head self-attention mechanism with a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) to classify seven subtypes of generalized and focal epileptic seizures. The model achieved 0.921 weighted accuracy and 0.902 weighted F1 score in classifying focal onset non-motor, generalized onset non-motor, simple partial, complex partial, absence, tonic, and tonic-clonic seizures. In comparison, a CNN model without multi-head attention achieved 0.767 weighted accuracy. Ablation studies were conducted to validate the importance of transformer encoders and attention. The promising classification results demonstrate the potential of deep learning for handling EEG complexity and improving epilepsy diagnosis. This seizure classification model could enable timely interventions when translated into clinical practice.

Construction and validation of an algorithm to separate focal and generalised epilepsy using clinical variables: A comparison of machine learning approaches.

PURPOSE: Epilepsy type, whether focal or generalised, is important in deciding anti-seizure medication (ASM). In resource-limited settings, investigations are usually not available, so a clinical separation is required. We used a naïve Bayes approach to devise an algorithm to do this, and compared its accuracy with algorithms devised by five other machine learning methods. METHODS: We used data on 28 clinical variables from 503 patients attending an epilepsy clinic in India with defined epilepsy type, as determined by an epileptologist with access to clinical, imaging, and EEG data. We adopted a machine learning approach to select the most relevant variables based on mutual information, to train the model on part of the data, and then to evaluate it on the remaining data (testing set). We used a naïve Bayes approach and compared the results in the testing set with those obtained by several other machine learning algorithms by measuring sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, area under the curve, and Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: The six machine learning methods produced broadly similar results. The best naïve Bayes algorithm contained eleven variables, and its accuracy was 92.2% in determining epilepsy type (sensitivity 92.0%, specificity 92.7%). An algorithm incorporating the best eight of these variables was only slightly less accurate - 91.0% (sensitivity 89.6%, and specificity 95.1%) - and easier for clinicians to use. CONCLUSION: A clinical algorithm with eight variables is effective and accurate at separating focal from generalised epilepsy. It should be useful in resource-limited settings, by epilepsy-inexperienced doctors, to help determine epilepsy type and therefore optimal ASMs for individual patients, without the need for EEG or neuroimaging.

The usefulness of NDDI-E and QOLIE-10 scales for the screening of major depressive disorders in patients with epilepsy in video-EEG units.

OBJECTIVE: Mood disorders in patients with epilepsy are common, with depression being the most prevalent. However, this comorbidity is often underdiagnosed. The systematic use of scales such as NDDI-E and QOLIE-10 in prolonged video-EEG monitoring units could be a useful tool for the detection of this comorbidity. METHODS: Descriptive cross-sectional study of a series of patients with epilepsy evaluated in a prolonged video-EEG monitoring unit. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-nine patients were included. The mean age was 49.1 years, and 49.3% were female. 66.2% had focal epilepsy. 20.4% had pharmacoresistant epilepsy. 38.7% of patients had NDDI-E > 13. 43% of patients with focal epilepsy had NDDI-E > 13 versus 21.8% of patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (p = .015). Patients with focal temporal epilepsy had the highest rate of NDDI-E > 13 (48.5%). Significant association was found between patient-perceived mood and NDDI-E score (p < .001). However, in the group of patients with NDDI-E > 13, 37.6% had reported feeling "very good" or "good" in mood. Likewise, in the group that had reported feeling "very good" or "good" 21.6% had NDDI-E > 13. In 50.5% of patients with NDDI-E > 13 some kind of therapeutic intervention aimed at this comorbidity was performed. Perceived quality of life as measured by the QOLIE-10 scale was lower in patients with NDDI-E > 13 (p < .001). SIGNIFICANCE: The use of scales such as the NDDI-E and QOLIE-10 at the time of admission in video-EEG monitoring units allows screening for major depressive disorders in patients with epilepsy, which subsequently needs to be confirmed by formal assessment by a psychiatrist. Their systematic use in these units prevents some patients from going undiagnosed. Detection of these disorders allows targeted therapeutic intervention.

Specific consistency score for rational selection of epilepsy resection surgery candidates.

OBJECTIVE: Degree of indication for epilepsy surgery is determined by taking multiple factors into account. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of the Specific Consistency Score (SCS), a proposed score for focal epilepsy to rate the indication for epilepsy focal resection. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients considered for resective epilepsy surgery in Kyoto University Hospital from 2011 to 2022. Plausible epileptic focus was tentatively defined. Cardinal findings were scored based on specificity and consistency with the estimated laterality and lobe. The total points represented SCS. The association between SCS and the following clinical parameters was assessed by univariate and multivariate analysis: (1) probability of undergoing resective epilepsy surgery, (2) good postoperative seizure outcome (Engel I and II or Engel I only), and (3) lobar concordance between the noninvasively estimated focus and intracranial electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings. RESULTS: A total of 131 patients were evaluated. Univariate analysis revealed higher SCS in the (1) epilepsy surgery group (8.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 7.8-8.9] vs. 4.9 [95% CI = 4.3-5.5] points; p < .001), (2) good postoperative seizure outcome group (Engel I and II; 8.7 [95% CI = 8.2-9.3] vs. 6.4 [95% CI = 4.5-8.3] points; p = .008), and (3) patients whose focus defined by intracranial EEG matched the noninvasively estimated focus (8.3 [95% CI = 7.3-9.2] vs. 5.4 [95% CI = 3.5-7.3] points; p = .004). Multivariate analysis revealed areas under the curve of .843, .825, and .881 for Parameters 1, 2, and 3, respectively. SIGNIFICANCE: SCS provides a reliable index of good indication for resective epilepsy surgery and can be easily available in many institutions not necessarily specializing in epilepsy.

Comprehensive review of status gelasticus: Diagnostic challenges and therapeutic insights.

Status gelasticus is a rare form of status epilepticus characterized by prolonged and/or clustered gelastic seizures. The review encompasses an analysis of cases reported in the literature, focusing on causes, clinical-electroencephalographic features, and therapeutic interventions. The study reveals the challenges in defining and understanding status gelasticus due to its diverse etiologies and limited reported cases. The association with hypothalamic hamartomas and other brain abnormalities underscores the importance of thorough evaluations. The review also discusses new treatments, including medications and less invasive surgeries. While progress has been made, the study points out challenges in diagnosing and managing this complex condition, highlighting the importance of ongoing research.

Detection of somatic and germline pathogenic variants in adult cohort of drug-resistant focal epilepsies.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the prevalence of pathogenic variants in the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway in surgical specimens of malformations of cortical development (MCDs) and cases with negative histology. The study also aims to evaluate the predictive value of genotype-histotype findings on the surgical outcome. METHODS: The study included patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who underwent epilepsy surgery. Cases were selected based on histopathological diagnosis, focusing on MCDs and negative findings. We included brain tissues both as formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) or fresh frozen (FF) samples. Single-molecule molecular inversion probes (smMIPs) analysis was conducted, targeting the MTOR gene in FFPE samples and 10 genes within the mTOR pathway in FF samples. Correlations between genotype-histotype and surgical outcome were examined. RESULTS: We included 78 patients for whom we obtained 28 FFPE samples and 50 FF tissues. Seventeen pathogenic variants (22 %) were identified and validated, with 13 being somatic within the MTOR gene and 4 germlines (2 DEPDC5, 1 TSC1, 1 TSC2). Pathogenic variants in mTOR pathway genes were exclusively found in FCDII and TSC cases, with a significant association between FCD type IIb and MTOR genotype (P = 0.003). Patients carrying mutations had a slightly better surgical outcome than the overall cohort, however it results not significant. The FCDII diagnosed cases more frequently had normal neuropsychological test, a higher incidence of auras, fewer multiple seizure types, lower occurrence of seizures with awareness impairment, less ictal automatisms, fewer Stereo-EEG investigations, and a longer period long-life of seizure freedom before surgery. SIGNIFICANCE: This study confirms that somatic MTOR variants represent the primary genetic alteration detected in brain specimens from FCDII/TSC cases, while germline DEPDC5, TSC1/TSC2 variants are relatively rare. Systematic screening for these mutations in surgically treated patients' brain specimens can aid histopathological diagnoses and serve as a biomarker for positive surgical outcomes. Certain clinical features associated with pathogenic variants in mTOR pathway genes may suggest a genetic etiology in FCDII patients.

Epilepsy with eyelid myoclonia (Jeavons syndrome): Generalized, focal, or combined generalized and focal epilepsy syndrome?

Epilepsy with eyelid myoclonia (EM) or Jeavons syndrome (JS) is an epileptic syndrome related to the spectrum of genetic generalized epilepsies (GGE). We report two untreated children on which EEGs were performed several hours after a generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTCS). These showed a unilateral, nearly continuous posterior slowing. This slow-wave activity was associated with contralateral epileptiform activity in one case, while in the second case, it was associated with an ipsilateral activity. However, in the latter child, a few months later an independent focus on the contralateral side was observed. A diagnosis of focal occipital lobe epilepsy was proposed in both cases, and one child underwent a left occipital lobectomy at 3.5 years of age. Despite surgery, absences with EM persisted in this child, and a marked photosensitivity to photic stimulation was observed two years later. The focal slow wave activity of one occipital lobe several hours after a GTCS in these two subjects was in favor of a focal onset preceding the generalization. The EEG evidence for independent left and right posterior focus in these two cases, the persistence of EM, and the development of a marked photosensitivity to photic stimulation in the child who underwent an occipital lobectomy, allow us to suggest that JS is associated with a network of bi-occipital hyperexcitability that rapidly engages bilaterally to produce generalized seizures.

Pitfalls of using video-EEG for a trial endpoint in children aged <4 years with focal seizures.

OBJECTIVE: Double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled trial SP0967 (NCT02477839/2013-000717-20) did not demonstrate superior efficacy of lacosamide versus placebo in patients aged ≥1 month to <4 years with uncontrolled focal seizures, per ≤72 h video-electroencephalogram (video-EEG)-based primary endpoints (reduction in average daily frequency of focal seizures at end-of-maintenance [EOM] versus end-of-baseline [EOB], patients with ≥50% response). This was unexpected because randomized controlled trial SP0969 (NCT01921205) showed efficacy of lacosamide in patients aged ≥4 to <17 years with uncontrolled focal seizures. SP0969's primary endpoint was based on seizure diary instead of video-EEG, an issue with the latter being inter-reader variability. We evaluated inter-reader agreement in video-EEG interpretation in SP0967, which to our knowledge, are the first such data for very young children with focal seizures from a placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: Local investigator and central reader agreement in video-EEG interpretation was analyzed post hoc. RESULTS: Analysis included 105 EOB and 98 EOM video-EEGs. Local investigators and central reader showed poor agreement based on ≥2 focal seizures at EOB (Kappa = 0.01), and fair agreement based on ≥2 focal seizures at EOM (Kappa = 0.23). Local investigator and central reader seizure count interpretations varied substantially, particularly for focal seizures, but also primary generalized and unclassified epileptic seizures, at both timepoints. INTERPRETATION: High inter-reader variability and low inter-reader reliability of the interpretation of seizure types and counts prevent confident conclusion regarding the lack of efficacy of lacosamide in this population. We recommend studies in very young children do not employ video-EEGs exclusively for accurate study inclusion or as an efficacy measure.

Ictal Central Apnea Is Predictive of Mesial Temporal Seizure Onset: An Intracranial Investigation.

OBJECTIVE: Ictal central apnea (ICA) is a semiological sign of focal epilepsy, associated with temporal and frontal lobe seizures. In this study, using qualitative and quantitative approaches, we aimed to assess the localizational value of ICA. We also aimed to compare ICA clinical utility in relation to other seizure semiological features of focal epilepsy. METHODS: We analyzed seizures in patients with medically refractory focal epilepsy undergoing intracranial stereotactic electroencephalographic (SEEG) evaluations with simultaneous multimodal cardiorespiratory monitoring. A total of 179 seizures in 72 patients with reliable artifact-free respiratory signal were analyzed. RESULTS: ICA was seen in 55 of 179 (30.7%) seizures. Presence of ICA predicted a mesial temporal seizure onset compared to those without ICA (odds ratio = 3.8, 95% confidence interval = 1.3-11.6, p = 0.01). ICA specificity was 0.82. ICA onset was correlated with increased high-frequency broadband gamma (60-150Hz) activity in specific mesial or basal temporal regions, including amygdala, hippocampus, and fusiform and lingual gyri. Based on our results, ICA has an almost 4-fold greater association with mesial temporal seizure onset zones compared to those without ICA and is highly specific for mesial temporal seizure onset zones. As evidence of symptomatogenic areas, onset-synchronous increase in high gamma activity in mesial or basal temporal structures was seen in early onset ICA, likely representing anatomical substrates for ICA generation. INTERPRETATION: ICA recognition may help anatomoelectroclinical localization of clinical seizure onset to specific mesial and basal temporal brain regions, and the inclusion of these regions in SEEG evaluations may help accurately pinpoint seizure onset zones for resection. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:998-1008.

How do children with focal epilepsies perceive the moment they realize that they are about to have a seizure? A pilot study.

PROBLEM: A seizure is a challenging situation for children with epilepsy. Little is known regarding the experience of children who perceive in advance that they are about to have a seizure. METHODS: From September 2020 to February 2021, we invited children with focal epilepsies aged 6-18 years to participate in a semi-structured interview. RESULTS: Of 52 children with focal epilepsies, 22 (42 %) said they perceive in advance that they are about to experience a seizure [11 with self-limited epilepsy with centro-temporal spikes (SELECTs), 11 with other focal epilepsies]. All 22/22 (100 %) children described physical symptoms such as headache or a numb feeling in one half of the body. Of those children, 17/22 (77 %) stated they try to do something about the seizure. Those strategies were perceived as helpful by 0/11 (0 %) children with SELECTs and 9/11 (86 %) children with other focal epilepsies (p < 0.001). Of the children with SELECTs 5/11 (45 %), and of those with other focal epilepsies 9/11 (86 %) stated they would like to know in the morning if they are to experience a seizure that day (n.s.). CONCLUSION: Children who perceive in advance that they are about to have a seizure are well able to describe their experience. Most children take measures to manage their seizures. Those measures were regarded as helpful by most children with other focal epilepsies, but by no child with SELECTs. Larger studies are necessary to determine the factors contributing to the child's perception as well as the nature of the support that they require.