The Adverse Effects of Commonly Prescribed Antiseizure Medications in Adults With Newly Diagnosed Focal Epilepsy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Systematic screening can help identify antiseizure medication (ASM)-associated adverse events (AEs) that may preclude patients from reaching effective doses or completing adequate trial periods. The Adverse Event Profile (AEP) is a self-completed instrument to identify the frequency of common AEs associated with ASM use. This study aimed to compare the AE profile of commonly used ASMs in adults with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. METHODS: The Human Epilepsy Project is a prospective, international, observational study investigating markers of treatment response in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. Participants were enrolled within 4 months of treatment initiation. Adult participants on levetiracetam, lamotrigine, carbamazepine, or oxcarbazepine monotherapy who completed the AEP and Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview at enrollment were included. Multivariable generalized linear and penalized logistic regression models assessed differences in total and itemized marginal AEP scores and dichotomized responses ("never/rarely" vs "sometimes/always"). RESULTS: A total of 225 adults initiated on levetiracetam (n = 132, 59%), lamotrigine (n = 55, 24%), carbamazepine (n = 19, 8.4%), or oxcarbazepine (n = 19, 8.4%) were included. There were no significant differences in AEP total scores between ASMs. Patients with depression (adjusted marginal score ratio [aMSR] 1.23, 95% CI 1.09-1.39, p = 0.001) and anxiety (aMSR 1.15, 95% CI 1.04-1.26, p = 0.007) had worse AEP total scores than those without. After adjusting for depression and anxiety, levetiracetam users were >3 times more likely to report feelings of aggression (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.38, 95% CI 1.07-10.7, p = 0.038) and almost half as likely to experience unsteadiness (aOR 0.45, 95% CI 0.21-0.99, p = 0.047) than lamotrigine users. Carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine had the highest rates of discontinuation (42.1%, each), followed by levetiracetam (34.8%) and lamotrigine (16.4%). Levetiracetam users had the highest proportion of discontinuations because of AEs alone (18%), and lamotrigine had the lowest (5%). DISCUSSION: Systematic screening for AEs in adults with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy on ASM monotherapy showed that those with comorbid psychiatric conditions report greater AEs overall, irrespective of ASM. Levetiracetam was associated with >3-fold risk of psychiatric AEs and half the risk of experiencing unsteadiness than lamotrigine. Levetiracetam had the highest proportion of discontinuations because of AEs alone, while lamotrigine had the lowest.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating phase IIa trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of multiple oral doses of Pynegabine tablets as add-on therapy in patients with focal epilepsy.

AIMS: This study aims to investigate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of Pynegabine as an add-on therapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy. METHODOLOGY: This is a protocol phase-IIa, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter study in patients with focal epilepsy from multiple centers in China who have been treated with at least 2 ASMs without effective control. The study involves an 8-week run-in period with stable use of previous medications. Patients are then randomized to receive either Pynegabine or a placebo. Sentinel administration is performed initially, and subsequent patients are randomized based on safety assessments. Three dose cohorts (15, 20, and 25 mg/d) are established. Efficacy is assessed through various measures, including seizure frequency, CGI score, PGI score, HAMA score, HAMD score, MoCA scale score, QOLIE-31 scale score, and 12 h-EEG score. Safety evaluations, PK blood samples, concomitant medications, and adverse events are also recorded. CONCLUSION: Data from the study will be used to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of Pynegabine tablets as add-on therapy for focal epilepsy.

[Study of the practice of prescribing phenosanic acid in epilepsy accompanied by asthenic disorders]. / Izuchenie effektivnosti primeneniya fenozanovoi kisloty pri epilepsii, soprovozhdayushcheisya astenicheskimi narusheniyami.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the experience of prescribing phenosanic acid in the practice of a neurologist/epileptologist when prescribing the second, third anticonvulsant drug (AED) as part of combination therapy for patients with manifestations of fatigue due to epilepsy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 501 patients with focal epilepsy accompanied by asthenic disorders were included in the observational program. The observation program protocol included 5 visits, including visit 1, at which screening and inclusion in the OP took place. The observation period was 10 months. At baseline and at the end of the 10-month follow-up, the patients' condition was assessed according to the following indicators: frequency and transformation of attacks with focal onset, severity of fatigue (self-assessment scale MFI-20); quality of life (questionnaire QoLiE-10-P); frequency of attacks with focal onset. The safety of phenosanic acid (Dibufelon) was also assessed. RESULTS: In 10 months after the inclusion of Dibufelon as the 2nd, 3rd AED in the treatment regimen, a statistically significant (p<0.01) decrease in the frequency of seizures was observed: in general - in 88% of patients; by 50% or more - in 76% of patients; transition from the group with a large number of seizures to the group with a smaller number of seizures - 74% of patients. Also when taking phenosanic acid, a positive dynamics of seizure type was noted: a reliable decrease in the proportion of patients with seizures with secondary generalization from 70% to 56%; a decrease in the number of focal seizures with impaired consciousness from 65% to 53%. In addition, there was a 38% decrease in the severity of fatigue on the MFI-20 scale (the greatest decrease on the «Mental fatigue¼ scale), improvement in the quality of life - a 2.7-fold increase in the mean values of the QOLIE-10 questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The addition of phenosanic acid to antiepileptic therapy as a second or third AED allows for better control of seizures, leading to a decrease the frequency and severity of attacks and the severity of fatigue both, and an increase of the quality of life of patients with epilepsy.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive Lacosamide therapy for focal seizures in young children aged ≥1 month to ≤4 years: A real-world study.

AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide therapy against focal seizures in young children (1 month - 4 years). METHODS: This non-randomized, open-label, and self-controlled real-world study included 105 children (1 month-4 years) with focal seizures treated with adjunctive lacosamide therapy at Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. RESULTS: (1) The 50% response rates at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of follow-up were 58.1%, 61.0%, 57.1%, and 56.2%, while the seizure-free rates were 27.6%, 34.3%, 32.4%, and 37.1%, respectively. The 50% response rate of the first addition of lacosamide for focal seizures was much higher than the second and later added treatment at 3 months (p = 0.038). After 1 year of follow-up, these children showed an improvement in neurodevelopmental levels (p < 0.05). (2) Lacosamide retention rate was 72.7% (64/88) after 1 year of follow-up. Lack of efficacy and serious adverse events were independent risk factors for the lacosamide retention rate. (3) During adjunctive lacosamide therapy, 13 (12.4%) patients reported adverse events and five (4.7%) patients withdrew due to adverse events, including vomiting drowsiness, ataxia (0.94%), neck itching with eczema (0.94%), irritability (1.88%), and gastrointestinal discomfort (0.94%). CONCLUSION: Adjunctive lacosamide therapy was effective, safe, and well-tolerated in young Chinese children with focal seizures in this study.

Cenobamate add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Although most people with epilepsy achieve complete seizure cessation, approximately one-third of those with the condition continue experiencing seizures despite the use of antiseizure medications (ASMs) given as monotherapy or polytherapy. In this review, we summarised the evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) about cenobamate as an add-on treatment for focal epilepsy uncontrolled by one or more concomitant ASMs. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of add-on oral cenobamate for the treatment of drug-resistant focal-onset seizures, defined as seizures persisting despite treatment with one or more ASMs. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web) and MEDLINE Ovid (September 2022). In addition, we contacted the manufacturer of cenobamate and experts in the field to enquire after any ongoing or unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs comparing add-on cenobamate to placebo or another ASM in people with focal epilepsy uncontrolled by one or more concomitant ASMs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, extracted data, performed risk of bias assessment, and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. Our primary outcomes were at least a 50% reduction in total seizure frequency, seizure freedom, and the occurrence of adverse events. We used an intention-to-treat approach for our primary analyses. For each outcome we estimated summary risk ratios (RRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We summarised the estimates of effects and certainty of the evidence for each outcome in a summary of findings table. MAIN RESULTS: We included two studies (659 adult participants, 442 allocated to cenobamate and 217 to placebo). The overall RR for at least a 50% reduction in seizure frequency for add-on cenobamate at any dose compared to placebo was 2.17 (52% versus 24%, 95% CI 1.66 to 2.84; 2 studies, 605 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The RR for seizure freedom for add-on cenobamate at any dose compared to placebo was 4.45 (16% versus 5%, 95% CI 2.25 to 8.78; 2 studies, 605 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The RR for the occurrence of adverse events for add-on cenobamate at any dose compared to placebo was 1.14 (77% versus 67%, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.27; 2 studies, 659 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). We judged the two included RCTs as at low or unclear risk of bias. Both studies were sponsored by the drug company that produces cenobamate. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Add-on cenobamate is probably better than placebo in reducing the frequency of seizures by at least 50% and in achieving seizure freedom in adults with focal epilepsy uncontrolled by one or more concomitant ASMs (moderate level of certainty). Its use is probably associated with an increased risk of adverse events (moderate level of certainty). Further prospective, controlled trials are required to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of add-on cenobamate compared to other ASMs. The efficacy and tolerability of cenobamate as adjunctive treatment for focal epilepsy in children should be further investigated. Finally, the long-term efficacy and tolerability of add-on cenobamate treatment in people with other epilepsy types (e.g. generalised epilepsy) or specific epilepsy syndromes, as well as its use as monotherapy, require additional study.

Efficacy and safety of add-on antiseizure medications for focal epilepsy: A network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Several antiseizure medications (ASMs) have been approved for the treatment of focal epilepsy. However, there is a paucity of evidence on direct comparison of ASMs. We evaluated the comparative efficacy and safety of all approved add-on ASMs for the treatment of focal epilepsy using network meta-analysis. METHODS: Data through extensive literature search was retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrial.gov databases using predefined search terms from inception through March 2023. PRISMA reporting guidelines (CRD42023403450) were followed in this study. Efficacy outcomes assessed were ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% responder rates. Patient retention rate and safety outcomes such as overall treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and individual TEAEs were assessed. "Gemtc" 4.0.4 package was used to perform Bayesian analysis. Outcomes are reported as relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Literature search retrieved 5807 studies of which, 75 studies were included in the analysis. All ASMs showed significantly higher ≥50% responder rate compared with placebo. Except the ≥75% seizure frequency reduction for zonisamide (2.23; 95% CI: 1.00-5.70) and 100% for rufinamide (2.03; 95% CI: 0.54-11.00), all other interventions showed significantly higher ≥75% and 100% responder rates compared with placebo. Among treatments, significantly higher 100% responder rate was observed with cenobamate compared to eslicarbazepine (10.71; 95% CI: 1.56-323.9) and zonisamide (10.63; 95% CI: 1.37-261.2). All ASMs showed a lower patient retention rate compared to placebo, with the least significant value observed for oxcarbazepine (0.77; 95% CI: 0.7-0.84). Levetiracetam showed a lower risk of incidence (1.0; 95%CI: 0.94-1.1; SUCRA: 0.885067) for overall TEAE compared with other medications. SIGNIFICANCE: All approved ASMs were effective as add-on treatment for focal epilepsy. Of the ASMs included, cenobamate had the greatest likelihood of allowing patients to attain seizure freedom. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This article compares the efficacy and safety of antiseizure medications (ASMs) currently available to neurologists in the treatment of epileptic patients. Several newer generation ASMs that have been developed may be as effective or better than the older medications. We included 75 studies in the analysis. In comparison, all drugs improved ≥50%, ≥75% and 100% responder rates compared to control, except for Zonisamide and Rufinamide in the ≥75% and 100% responder rate categories. Retention of patients undergoing treatment was lower in drugs than placebo. All drugs were tolerated, the levetiracetam showed the best tolerability. Cenobamate more likely help completely to reduce seizures.

[Neuropsychological profile of Mexican paediatric patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy]. / Perfil neuropsicológico de pacientes pediátricos mexicanos con epilepsia focal farmacorresistente.

INTRODUCTION: At least 20% of paediatric patients with epilepsy present resistance to multiple anti-crisis drugs in trials, which has a negative impact on their neuropsychological state, quality of life and prognosis; it is therefore necessary to document their neuropsychological profile in order to improve the clinical approach to them. AIMS: To describe the neuropsychological profile (cognitive, academic, behavioural, emotional, adaptive, sleep disturbances and quality of life) of paediatric patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy in the frontal, temporal and occipital lobes, and to compare performance between patients with frontal and temporal foci, and to assess the link between the duration of the condition, the frequency of seizures and the amount of anti-crisis drugs and the neuropsychological profile. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The neuropsychological profile of 19 paediatric patients with a diagnosis of pharmacoresistant epilepsy with a mean age of 10.89 years was evaluated. RESULTS: 57.9% of the 19 patients were men. 63.2% presented frontal focus; 26.3% presented temporal focus; and 10.5% presented occipital focus. Deficiencies in attention, comprehension, verbal memory, working memory and processing speed, in addition to adaptive difficulties were observed. When the patients with frontal and temporal focus were compared, the former were found to present greater deficits in planning, while the patients with temporal focus presented more severe symptoms of anxiety. Patients with a longer disease duration were found to present greater impairment to their intelligence quotient and adaptive behavioural skills. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacoresistant epilepsy in paediatric patients affects intelligence quotient and adaptive skills, as well as attention, memory and executive functions, and neuropsychological intervention programmes must therefore be implemented to improve these patients' quality of life.

TITLE: Perfil neuropsicológico de pacientes pediátricos mexicanos con epilepsia focal farmacorresistente.Introducción. Al menos el 20% de los pacientes pediátricos con epilepsia muestra resistencia a los ensayos de múltiples fármacos anticrisis, que impactan negativamente en su estado neuropsicológico, calidad de vida y pronóstico; por tal motivo, es necesario documentar ampliamente su perfil neuropsicológico para mejorar su abordaje clínico. Objetivos. Describir el perfil neuropsicológico (cognitivo, académico, conductual, emocional, adaptativo, alteraciones del sueño y calidad de vida) de pacientes pediátricos con epilepsia focal farmacorresistente de los lóbulos frontal, temporal y occipital, así como comparar el desempeño entre los pacientes con foco frontal y temporal, y evaluar la asociación entre la duración del padecimiento, la frecuencia de las crisis y la cantidad de fármacos anticrisis con el perfil neuropsicológico. Pacientes y métodos. Se evaluó el perfil neuropsicológico de 19 pacientes pediátricos con diagnóstico de epilepsia farmacorresistente, con una edad promedio de 10,89 años. Resultados. De los 19 pacientes, el 57,9% fueron hombres. El 63,2% presentó foco frontal; el 26,3%, temporal; y el 10,5%, occipital. Se encontraron deficiencias en atención, comprensión, memoria verbal, memoria de trabajo y velocidad de procesamiento, además de dificultades adaptativas. Al comparar a los pacientes con foco frontal y temporal, se encontró que los primeros presentaron mayores deficiencias en planificación, mientras que los pacientes con foco temporal presentaron mayores síntomas de ansiedad. Con respecto a la duración de la enfermedad, se encontró que los pacientes con mayor duración del padecimiento presentaron mayor afectación en el cociente intelectual y en las habilidades en la conducta adaptativa. Conclusiones. La epilepsia farmacorresistente en pacientes pediátricos afecta el cociente intelectual y las habilidades adaptativas, así como a la atención, la memoria y las funciones ejecutivas, por lo que es necesaria la implementación de programas de intervención neuropsicológica para mejorar la calidad de vida de estos pacientes.

Long-term effects of adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate in adult Asian patients with refractory focal seizures: Post hoc analysis of a phase III trial.

A post hoc analysis of data from Asian patients included in the study BIA-2093-304 was conducted to evaluate the long-term safety/tolerability and efficacy of adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) in adult Asian patients with refractory focal seizures. Part I was a randomized controlled trial, in which patients received ESL (800 or 1200 mg once daily [QD]) or placebo, assessed over a 12-week maintenance period. Patients completing Part I could enter two open-label extension periods (Part II, 1 year; Part III, ≥2 years), during which all received ESL (400-1600 mg QD). Safety/tolerability was assessed by evaluating treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Efficacy assessments included responder and seizure freedom rates. The safety population included 125, 92, and 23 Asian patients in Parts I, II, and III, respectively. Incidence of ESL-related TEAEs was 61.3%, 45.7%, and 17.4% during Parts I, II, and III, respectively. ESL-related TEAEs (most commonly, dizziness, somnolence, and headache) were consistent with ESL's known safety profile. During Part I, responder rates were higher with ESL 800 (41.7%) and 1200 mg QD (44.4%) versus placebo (32.6%), although not statistically significant. Seizure freedom rates with ESL 800 (5.5%) and 1200 mg QD (11.1%) were also higher versus placebo (0%) (p < 0.05 for ESL 1200 mg QD versus placebo). At the end of Part II, responder and seizure freedom rates were 60.3% and 14.7%, respectively. In summary, adult Asian patients with refractory focal seizures were responsive to treatment with ESL as adjunctive therapy and generally showed treatment tolerance well for up to 3 years. No new/unexpected safety findings were observed.

Real-world anti-seizure treatment and adverse events among individuals living with drug-resistant focal epilepsy in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to understand how people living with drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DRE) navigate through lines of antiseizure medications (ASM) and experience adverse events (AEs) in the real-world setting in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted with medical chart data from clinical practices in the United States. Eligible adults had a confirmed diagnosis of DRE and initiated a third-line ASM therapy between January 2013 and January 2020 (i.e., the index date). Subjects must have medical history data available for ≥1 year prior to (the baseline) and ≥2 years after the index date (the follow-up). Treatment patterns were captured from first to fourth lines. After the emergence of drug resistance, time to ASM discontinuation, reasons for discontinuation, AE experience and AE management were reported separately during third and fourth lines of treatment and beyond. RESULTS: The study included a total of 345 individuals, with an average (standard deviation) age of 23.9 (11.9) years at first diagnosis. All individuals had at least three lines of ASMs with first and second lines during baseline, and third line during follow-up. The first line for most individuals was monotherapy. As individuals progressed through additional lines of ASM therapy, they were more likely to receive polytherapy. The regimens were more individualized after meeting drug resistance criteria. The top reasons for discontinuing were uncontrolled seizure and/or intolerance/AEs for both third and subsequent lines. More than a third of individuals experienced at least one AE. Among those with at least one AE, many individuals had to manage these AEs with dose adjustment (39.4%), discontinuation of offending ASM (37.9%), de novo pharmacotherapy (25.8%), emergency room visit (13.6%), and hospitalization (12.1%). SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrated that individuals living with DRE experience significant AEs, and many of these AEs lead to treatment disruption and significant healthcare resource utilization. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This study examined how individuals with focal epilepsy are treated across various clinics in United States and reported the adverse events these individuals experienced during treatment, along with the consequence associated with these adverse events. We found that as individuals progressed through additional treatments, they were more and more likely to receive more than one antiseizure medication, and a significant portion of individuals experienced at least one adverse event, often manifested as headache, somnolence, dizziness, and fatigue.

The Role of EEG microstates in predicting oxcarbazepine treatment outcomes in patients with newly-diagnosed focal epilepsy.

PURPOSE: Microstates represent the global and topographical distribution of electrical brain activity from scalp-recorded EEG. This study aims to explore EEG microstates of patients with focal epilepsy prior to medication, and employ extracted microstate metrics for predicting treatment outcomes with Oxcarbazepine monotherapy. METHODS: This study involved 25 newly-diagnosed focal epilepsy patients (13 females), aged 12 to 68, with various etiologies. Patients were categorized into Non-Seizure-Free (NSF) and Seizure-Free (SF) groups according to their first follow-up outcomes. From pre-medication EEGs, four representative microstates were identified by using clustering. The temporal parameters and transition probabilities of microstates were extracted and analyzed to discern group differences. With generating sample method, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), and Naïve Bayes (NB) classifiers were employed for predicting treatment outcomes. RESULTS: In the NSF group, Microstate 1 (MS1) exhibited a significantly higher duration (mean±std. = 0.092±0.008 vs. 0.085±0.008, p = 0.047), occurrence (mean±std. = 2.587±0.334 vs. 2.260±0.278, p = 0.014), and coverage (mean±std. = 0.240±0.046 vs. 0.194±0.040, p = 0.014) compared to the SF group. Additionally, the transition probabilities from Microstate 2 (MS2) and Microstate 3 (MS3) to MS1 were increased. In MS2, the NSF group displayed a stronger correlation (mean±std. = 0.618±0.025 vs. 0.571±0.034, p < 0.001) and a higher global explained variance (mean±std. = 0.083±0.035 vs. 0.055±0.023, p = 0.027) than the SF group. Conversely, Microstate 4 (MS4) in the SF group demonstrated significantly greater coverage (mean±std. = 0.388±0.074 vs. 0.334±0.052, p = 0.046) and more frequent transitions from MS2 to MS4, indicating a distinct pattern. Temporal parameters contribute major predictive role in predicting treatment outcomes of Oxcarbazepine, with area under curves (AUCs) of 0.95, 0.70, and 0.86, achieved by LR, NB and SVM, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study underscores the potential of EEG microstates as predictive biomarkers for Oxcarbazepine treatment responses in newly-diagnosed focal epilepsy patients.

Time-course of drug-related psychiatric and behavioral treatment-emergent adverse events during brivaracetam treatment in adults with focal-onset seizures.

OBJECTIVE: We previously analyzed data from three phase lll trials of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) in adults showing that the incidence and prevalence of drug-related central nervous system treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) quickly peaked and decreased over several weeks following BRV treatment initiation. However, that analysis did not assess psychiatric and behavioral side effects which can occur with antiseizure medication (ASM) treatment. Here, we investigate the time-course of psychiatric and behavioral TEAEs by week of BRV treatment and how these TEAEs were managed. METHODS: Data were pooled from three trials (N01252 [NCT00490035]; N01253 [NCT00464269]; N01358 [NCT01261325]) in adult patients (≥16 years of age) with focal-onset seizures receiving BRV adjunctive therapy. This post hoc analysis reports data on the incidence and prevalence of drug-related psychiatric or behavioral TEAEs over time in patients who received BRV doses of 50-200 mg/day (without titration) or placebo (PBO) during the 12-week treatment period. A logistic regression model was used to determine if psychiatric or behavioral comorbid conditions were predictors for drug-related psychiatric or behavioral TEAEs, or BRV discontinuation due to psychiatric or behavioral TEAEs. RESULTS: A total of 803 patients received BRV 50-200 mg/day, and 459 patients received PBO. Drug-related psychiatric or behavioral TEAEs were reported by 11.0 % of patients during adjunctive BRV treatment (PBO: 4.8 %) with onset early after BRV initiation (median time to onset of first drug-related psychiatric or behavioral TEAE: 15 days). Incidence peaked at week 1 and decreased over the first 4 weeks following BRV initiation. Prevalence peaked at week 4 and then remained stable between weeks 5-12. In an analysis excluding patients on concomitant levetiracetam (BRV: n = 744; PBO: n = 422), the incidence of drug-related psychiatric or behavioral TEAEs was similar to the incidence in the overall population. The most common drug-related psychiatric or behavioral TEAEs were irritability, insomnia, depression, and anxiety. Only 2 % of patients discontinued BRV due to psychiatric or behavioral TEAEs (PBO: 1.3 %), while most patients on BRV who reported drug-related psychiatric or behavioral TEAEs did not require a change in dose (84.1 %; PBO: 63.6 %). A history of psychiatric or behavioral comorbid conditions (not ongoing at BRV initiation) was not associated with an increased likelihood of drug-related psychiatric or behavioral TEAEs, or BRV discontinuation due to psychiatric or behavioral TEAEs. Ongoing psychiatric or behavioral comorbid conditions at BRV initiation increased the likelihood of drug-related psychiatric or behavioral TEAEs, but not the likelihood of BRV discontinuation due to psychiatric or behavioral TEAEs. CONCLUSIONS: Drug-related psychiatric and behavioral TEAEs occurred early during BRV treatment, and most patients did not require a change in BRV dose. These data can help guide clinician monitoring and patient expectations after starting BRV.

Spanish consensus on the management of concomitant antiseizure medications when using cenobamate in adults with drug-resistant focal seizures.

OBJECTIVE: Cenobamate is an antiseizure medication (ASM) associated with high rates of seizure freedom and acceptable tolerability in patients with focal seizures. To achieve the optimal cenobamate dose for maximal potential effectiveness while avoiding or minimizing drug-related adverse events (AEs), the administration of cenobamate with other ASMs must be managed through concomitant ASM load reduction. A panel of Spanish epilepsy experts aimed to provide a Spanish consensus on how to adjust the dose of concomitant ASMs in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) in order to improve the effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate. METHODS: A three-stage modified Delphi consensus process was undertaken, including six Spanish epileptologists with extensive experience using cenobamate. Based on current literature and their own expert opinion, the expert panel reached a consensus on when and how to adjust the dosage of concomitant ASMs during cenobamate titration. RESULTS: The expert panel agreed that tailored titration and close follow-up are required to achieve the best efficacy and tolerability when initiating cenobamate in patients receiving concomitant ASMs. When concomitant clobazam, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and sodium channel blockers are taken at high dosages, or when the patient is receiving two or more sodium channel blockers, dosages should be proactively lowered during the cenobamate titration period. Other concomitant ASMs should be reduced only if the patient reports a moderate/severe AE at any stage of the titration period. SIGNIFICANCE: Cenobamate is an effective ASM with a dose-dependent effect. To maximize effectiveness while maintaining the best tolerability profile, co-medication management is needed. The recommendations included herein provide practical guidance for proactive and reactive management of co-medication in cenobamate-treated patients with DRE and a high drug load. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Patients with epilepsy may continue to have seizures even after treatment with several different antiseizure medications (ASMs). Cenobamate is an ASM that can reduce seizures in these patients. In this study, six Spanish experts in epilepsy discussed the best way to use cenobamate in drug-resistant epilepsy. They provide practical guidance on when and how the dose of other ASMs might be adjusted to reduce side effects and optimize the use of cenobamate.

A comparison of cenobamate with other newer antiseizure medications for adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of cenobamate with other newer anti-seizure medications (ASMs) including brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine, lacosamide, perampanel, and zonisamide, approved for adjunctive treatment of drug-resistant focal-onset seizures (FOS) in adults with epilepsy. METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to obtain relevant efficacy, safety, and tolerability data for ASMs for the treatment of drug-resistant FOS. All studies were thoroughly assessed for potential sources of heterogeneity and analysed via Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMAs). Efficacy outcomes were ≥50 % responder rate and seizure freedom during the maintenance period, which were modelled simultaneously using a multinomial Bayesian NMA. Safety and tolerability outcomes were the proportion of patients who experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and the proportion who experienced at least one TEAE leading to discontinuation. RESULTS: The SLR identified 76 studies, of which 23 were included in the Bayesian NMAs. Cenobamate was associated with statistically significant higher rates for the ≥50 % responder rate and seizure freedom outcomes compared with all ASMs analysed. The point estimates indicated that cenobamate was associated with higher rates of experiencing at least one TEAE and at least one TEAE leading to discontinuation compared with brivaracetam, lacosamide, and zonisamide; however, no results were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Cenobamate was associated with increased efficacy compared with all ASMs analysed. There were no statistically significant differences in the safety and tolerability outcomes. The results presented corroborate the conclusions drawn from previous published NMAs, which also highlight the notable efficacy of cenobamate in comparison with other ASMs.

Brivaracetam use in clinical practice: a Delphi consensus on its role as first add-on therapy in focal epilepsy and beyond.

BACKGROUND: Antiseizure medications remain the cornerstone of treatment for epilepsy, although a proportion of individuals with the condition will continue to experience seizures despite appropriate therapy. Treatment choices for epilepsy are based on variables related to both the individual patient and the available medications. Brivaracetam is a third-generation agent antiseizure medication. METHODS: We carried out a Delphi consensus exercise to define the role of brivaracetam in clinical practice and to provide guidance about its use as first add-on ASM and in selected clinical scenarios. A total of 15 consensus statements were drafted by an expert panel following review of the literature and all were approved in the first round of voting by panelists. The consensus indicated different clinical scenarios for which brivaracetam can be a good candidate for treatment, including first add-on use. RESULTS: Overall, brivaracetam was considered to have many advantageous characteristics that render it a suitable option for patients with focal epilepsy, including a fast onset of action, favorable pharmacokinetic profile with few drug-drug interactions, broad-spectrum activity, and being well tolerated across a range of doses. Brivaracetam is also associated with sustained clinical response and good tolerability in the long term. CONCLUSIONS: These characteristics also make it suitable as an early add-on for the elderly and for patients with post-stroke epilepsy or status epilepticus as highlighted by the present Delphi consensus.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam in adult Asian patients with uncontrolled focal-onset seizures: A phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) in adult Asian patients with focal-onset seizures (FOS). METHODS: Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (EP0083; NCT03083665) evaluating BRV 50 mg/day and 200 mg/day in patients (≥16-80 years) with FOS with/without secondary generalization (focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures) despite current treatment with 1 or 2 concomitant antiseizure medications. Following an 8-week baseline, patients were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo, BRV 50 mg/day, or BRV 200 mg/day, and entered a 12-week treatment period. Efficacy outcomes: percent reduction over placebo in 28-day FOS frequency (primary); 50% responder rate in FOS frequency; median percent reduction in FOS frequency from baseline; seizure freedom during treatment period (secondary). Primary safety endpoints: incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); TEAEs leading to discontinuation; serious TEAEs. RESULTS: In this study, 448/449 randomized patients (mean age, 34.5 years; 53.8% female) received ≥1 dose of study medication (placebo/BRV 50 mg/BRV 200 mg/day: n = 149/151/148). Percent reduction over placebo in 28-day adjusted FOS frequency was 24.5% (p = 0.0005) and 33.4% (p < 0.0001) with BRV 50 mg/day and 200 mg/day, respectively, 50% responder rate was 19.0%, 41.1%, and 49.3% with placebo, BRV 50 mg/day, and BRV 200 mg/day, respectively (p < 0.0001 for both BRV groups vs. placebo). Median percent reduction in FOS frequency from baseline was 21.3%/38.9%/46.7% in patients on placebo/BRV 50 mg/BRV 200 mg/day, respectively. Overall, 0, 7 (4.6%), and 10 (6.8%) patients were classified as seizure-free during the treatment period on placebo, BRV 50 mg/day, and BRV 200 mg/day, respectively (p = 0.0146/p = 0.0017 for BRV 50 mg/200 mg/day vs. placebo, respectively). TEAE incidences were similar between patients on placebo (58.4%) and all patients receiving BRV (58.5%); TEAE incidences for BRV 50 mg/day and BRV 200 mg/day were 57.0% and 60.1%, respectively. Overall, 0.7% of patients on placebo and 2.0% of all patients on BRV reported serious TEAEs (incidences for BRV 50 mg/day and BRV 200 mg/day were 1.3% and 2.7%, respectively), 20.1% of patients on placebo and 33.1% of all patients on BRV reported drug-related TEAEs (incidences for BRV 50 mg/day and BRV 200 mg/day were 26.5% and 39.9%, respectively), and 4.7% of patients on placebo and 3.0% of all patients on BRV discontinued due to TEAEs (discontinuation incidences for BRV 50 mg/day and BRV 200 mg/day were 2.6% and 3.4%, respectively). SIGNIFICANCE: Adjunctive BRV was efficacious and well tolerated in adult Asian patients with FOS. Efficacy and safety profiles were consistent with BRV studies in predominantly non-Asian populations. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Brivaracetam is used to treat partial or focal seizures in people with epilepsy. Most studies with brivaracetam tablets have involved people from non-Asian racial backgrounds. In this study, 449 Asian adults with epilepsy took part. One third took 50 mg of brivaracetam, one third took 200 mg of brivaracetam, and one third took a placebo each day for 12 weeks. On average, those who took brivaracetam had fewer seizures than those given the placebo. Most of the side effects were mild and the number and type of side effects seen were as expected for this medication.

The latest advances in the pharmacological management of focal epilepsies in children: a narrative review.

INTRODUCTION: Focal epilepsy constitutes the most common epilepsy in children, and medical treatment represents the first-line therapy in this condition. The main goal of medical treatment for children and adolescents with epilepsy is the achievement of seizure freedom or, in drug-resistant epilepsies, a significant seizure reduction, both minimizing antiseizure medications (ASM)-related adverse events, thus improving the patient's quality of life. However, up to 20-40% of pediatric epilepsies are refractory to drug treatments. New ASMs came to light in the pediatric landscape, improving the drug profile compared to that of the preexisting ones. Clinicians should consider several factors during the drug choice process, including patient and medication-specific characteristics. AREAS COVERED: This narrative review aims to summarize the latest evidence on the effectiveness and tolerability of the newest ASMs administered as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy in pediatric epilepsies with focal onset seizures, providing a practical appraisal based on the existing evidence. EXPERT OPINION: The latest ASMs have the potential to be effective in the pharmacological management of focal onset seizures in children, and treatment choice should consider several drug- and epilepsy-related factors. Future treatments should be increasingly personalized and targeted on patient-specific pathways. Future research should focus on discovering new chemical compounds and repurposing medications used for other indications.

[Experimental study of the influence of phenozanic acid and its combination with valproic acid on the development of the epileptic system]. / Izuchenie vliyaniya fenozanovoi kisloty i ee kombinatsii s val'proevoi kislotoi na razvitie epilepticheskoi sistemy v eksperimente.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of phenosanic acid (PA) and its combination with valproic acid (VA) on the development of the Epi system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A model of focal chronic epilepsy in rats was created by applying metallic cobalt to the surface of the sensorimotor area of the cortex. Long-term electrodes were implanted in the sensorimotor cortex of the left and right hemispheres, the hippocampus, and the hypothalamus. The effect of PA (80 mg/kg) and its combination with VA (200 mg/kg) on discharge activity was carried out on the 2nd day and at the stage of generalization of the Epi system - on the 6th day. The stability of the Epi system on day 10 was assessed by provoking the development of epileptic status (Epi status) in response to the administration of thiolactone homocysteine (HMC) at a dose of 5.5 mmol/kg. RESULTS: In rats treated with PA, low discharge activity is observed, which is confirmed by the absence of EEG and motor manifestations of status epilepticus caused by HMC. PA does not suppress paroxysmal activity at the stages of development of the Epi system. VA significantly suppresses paroxysmal activity, but does not affect the formation of new foci of Epi activity in subcortical structures and the contralateral cortex. The epi system of rats treated with VA is characterized by high discharge activity by the 10th day of the experiment and lability to provocation of epi status. The combination of drugs is more pronounced than PA, but less than VA, reduces the numerical characteristics of paroxysmal activity in the brain structures of rats. CONCLUSION: PA when administered alone, in combination with VA, causes a slowdown in the generalization of convulsive foci of Epi activity and prevents the formation of a stable Epi system. VA, having a pronounced anticonvulsant effect, does not weaken the development of the Epi system in the model of focal cobalt-induced epilepsy.

Outcomes and predictors of seizure recurrence in post-stroke epilepsy, a retrospective hospital-based study.

BACKGROUND: The occurrence of seizures following a stroke is a well-recognized complication associated with a significant increase in morbidity and mortality. Despite the numerous studies examining outcomes and risk factors related to post-stroke seizures (PSS), there remains a lack of clarity regarding the clinical characteristics, treatment, and PSS recurrence (PSSR) rates in patients experiencing their initial episode of PSS. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the risk factors for developing recurrent seizures after first PSS and their effects on functional outcomes and mortality. METHODS: All patients underwent an electroencephalography (EEG) and were monitored for a minimum of 24 months following the first PSS. The primary endpoint was the recurrence of seizures. Predictive factors for PSSR were determined by using the Cox-proportional hazards model, and the cumulative latency of recurrence at 90, 180, 360, and 720 days was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Seizure recurred in 36.8% (39/106). Significant association of PSSR was noted with female gender, use of older anti-seizure medications (ASMs) (p<0.001), EEG findings as focal slow wave activity (p<0.001), Ictal epileptiform abnormalities (p=0.015), status epilepticus (p=0.015), and with severe disability (p=0.008). However, multivariate cox-proportional hazards model showed significant association of female gender (HR=3.28; 95% CI: 1.42-7.58; p=0.006). Hazard ratio (HR) was increased with older ASMs use, focal aware seizure types, Ictal EAs, and periodic discharges on EEG; though, statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Factors such as the type of ASMs, EEG findings, and seizure type were significantly linked to PSSR. Female gender was the only independent predictor established. Additionally, significant functional decline was reported with recurrence.

ZFHX3 variants cause childhood partial epilepsy and infantile spasms with favourable outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The ZFHX3 gene plays vital roles in embryonic development, cell proliferation, neuronal differentiation and neuronal death. This study aims to explore the relationship between ZFHX3 variants and epilepsy. METHODS: Whole-exome sequencing was performed in a cohort of 378 patients with partial (focal) epilepsy. A Drosophila Zfh2 knockdown model was used to validate the association between ZFHX3 and epilepsy. RESULTS: Compound heterozygous ZFHX3 variants were identified in eight unrelated cases. The burden of ZFHX3 variants was significantly higher in the case cohort, shown by multiple/specific statistical analyses. In Zfh2 knockdown flies, the incidence and duration of seizure-like behaviour were significantly greater than those in the controls. The Zfh2 knockdown flies exhibited more firing in excitatory neurons. All patients presented partial seizures. The five patients with variants in the C-terminus/N-terminus presented mild partial epilepsy. The other three patients included one who experienced frequent non-convulsive status epilepticus and two who had early spasms. These three patients had also neurodevelopmental abnormalities and were diagnosed as developmental epileptic encephalopathy (DEE), but achieved seizure-free after antiepileptic-drug treatment without adrenocorticotropic-hormone/steroids. The analyses of temporal expression (genetic dependent stages) indicated that ZFHX3 orthologous were highly expressed in the embryonic stage and decreased dramatically after birth. CONCLUSION: ZFHX3 is a novel causative gene of childhood partial epilepsy and DEE. The patients of infantile spasms achieved seizure-free after treatment without adrenocorticotropic-hormone/steroids implies a significance of genetic diagnosis in precise treatment. The genetic dependent stage provided an insight into the underlying mechanism of the evolutional course of illness.