Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Brachytherapy ; 19(1): 60-65, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31587986

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the direct economic impact of two vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VBT) schedules in postoperative endometrial carcinoma (PEC) with similar vaginal control and toxicity results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2006 to 2015, 397 PEC patients (p) were treated with VBT: mean 40p/year, 67.5% received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT)+VBT and 32.5% exclusive VBT. Schedule 1: 3 fractions (Fr) after EBRT and 6Fr (4-6 Gy/Fr) in exclusive VBT. Schedule 2: 7Gy × 1Fr + EBRT and 6Gy × 3Fr in exclusive VBT. Differential cost analysis of the two schedules was retrospectively performed. The direct costs in each schedule were (1) Personnel: radiotherapy technicians, nurses, radiation oncologists, medical physicists, administrative personnel, orderlies; time dedicated by each professional during CT planning acquisitions and delineation of vagina/organs at risk, dosimetric study and evaluation, autoradiography, procedure reporting time during/after treatment, removal of bladder/rectal tubes and applicators, material cleaning and transportation for sterilization; (2) Health care material (gels, gauzes, gloves, etc); (3) Equipment (time equipment used). The differential between the two schedules was estimated. Indirect costs and evaluation of quality of life-adjusted costs were not considered. RESULTS: The overall reduction in the number of Fr per year in Schedule 2 was 93. Cost savings included treatment time per year: 4,185 min (70 h); personnel: 221€ ($246)/p in EBRT + VBT and 331€ ($368)/p in exclusive VBT; and health care material and equipment: 40€ ($44.5)/p in EBRT + VBT and 90€ ($100.2)/p in exclusive VBT. The overall savings per patient was 261€ ($295) in combined treatment and 421€ ($475.7) in exclusive VBT. The total savings per year with Schedule 2 in 40p was 12,503€ ($13,915.8). CONCLUSIONS: A 41% reduction in the fractions number in VBT for PEC allowed economic savings of 261€ ($290.5)/p in combined treatment and 421€ ($475.7)/p in exclusive VBT. Other benefits include patient comfort and fewer treatment visits.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/economía , Braquiterapia/métodos , Carcinoma/radioterapia , Costos Directos de Servicios/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Endometriales/radioterapia , Carcinoma/economía , Carcinoma/cirugía , Terapia Combinada , Ahorro de Costo/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Equipos Desechables/economía , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Neoplasias Endometriales/economía , Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Femenino , Personal de Salud/economía , Humanos , Equipos y Suministros de Radiación/economía , Radioterapia Adyuvante/economía , Radioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vagina
2.
Technol Cancer Res Treat ; 13(3): 195-209, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23919396

RESUMEN

The aim of the study is to design and validate an indigenous three dimensional Radiation Field Analyser (3D RFA). The feed system made for X, Y and Z axis movements is of lead screw with deep ball bearing mechanism made up of stain less steel driven by stepper motors with accuracy less than 0.5 mm. The telescopic column lifting unit was designed using linear actuation technology for lifting the water phantom. The acrylic phantom with dimensions of 800 x 750 x 570 mm was made with thickness of 15 mm. The software was developed in visual basic programming language, classified into two types, viz. beam analyzer software and beam acquisition software. The premeasurement checks were performed as per TG 106 recommendations. The physical parameters of photon PDDs such as Dmax, D10, D20 and Quality Index (QI), and the electron PDDs such as R50, Rp, E0, Epo and X-ray contamination values can be obtained instantaneously by using the developed RFA system. Also the results for profile data such as field size, central axis deviation, penumbra, flatness and symmetry calculated according to various protocols can be obtained for both photon and electron beams. The result of PDDs for photon beams were compared with BJR25 supplement values and the profile data were compared with TG 40 recommendation. The results were in agreement with standard protocols.


Asunto(s)
Equipos y Suministros de Radiación/economía , Monitoreo de Radiación/instrumentación , Monitoreo de Radiación/métodos , Imagenología Tridimensional , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Dispersión de Radiación , Programas Informáticos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA