Drug-drug interactions of icenticaftor (QBW251) with a 5-probe cytochrome P450 cocktail and oral contraceptives.

A drug-drug interaction (DDI) study was conducted to evaluate the effect of icenticaftor (QBW251) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a 5-probe cytochrome P450 (CYP) substrate cocktail, guided by in vitro studies in human hepatocytes and liver microsomes. Another DDI study investigated the effect of icenticaftor on the PK and pharmacodynamics (PD) of a monophasic oral contraceptive (OC) containing ethinyl estradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LVG) in premenopausal healthy female subjects. The static-mechanistic DDI assessment indicated that icenticaftor may moderately induce the metabolic clearance of co-medications metabolized by CYP3A4 (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] ratio: 0.47) and potentially CYP2C; icenticaftor may also weakly inhibit the metabolic clearance of co-medications metabolized by CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 (AUC ratio: 1.35 and 1.86, respectively) and moderately inhibit CYP2B6 (AUC ratio: 2.11). In the CYP substrate cocktail DDI study, icenticaftor 300 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) moderately inhibited CYP1A2 (AUC ratio: 3.35) and CYP2C19 (AUC ratio: 2.70). As expected from the results of the in vitro studies, weak induction was observed for CYP3A4 (AUC ratio: 0.51) and CYP2C8 (AUC ratio: 0.66). In the OC DDI study, co-administration of icenticaftor 450 mg b.i.d. with monophasic OC containing 30-µg EE and 150-µg LVG once daily reduced the plasma exposure of both components by approximately 50% and led to increased levels of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone. These results provide valuable guidance for the use of icenticaftor in patients taking concomitant medications that are substrates of CYP enzymes or patients using OCs.

Bioequivalence study of low dose drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol 3 mg/0.03 mg film tablets under fasting conditions in Turkish healthy female subjects.

This bioequivalence research aims to evaluate the relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetic characteristics of ethinyl estradiol and drospirenone in the test preparation in comparison to the reference preparation during fasting conditions. A liquid chromatography method with tandem mass spectrometry was used to determine the concentrations of drospirenone and ethinyl estradiol in plasma. The pharmacokinetic parameters that were analyzed were the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to achieve Cmax (tmax), elimination half life, and area under the concentration time curve of plasma (AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ for ethinyl estradiol, and AUC0-72h for drospirenone). Both the AUC and Cmax parameters were determined to be between 80.00% and 125.00% (90% confidence intervals), which is the acceptable range. Based on the study findings, it was concluded that the test formulation, which includes 3 mg of drospirenone and 0.03 mg of ethinyl estradiol, demonstrated bioequivalence when compared to the reference formulation.

Effects of the selective AMPA modulator NBI-1065845 on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam or ethinyl estradiol-levonorgestrel in healthy adults.

This parallel-arm, phase I study investigated the potential cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A induction effect of NBI-1065845 (TAK-653), an investigational α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor potentiator in phase II development for major depressive disorder. The midazolam treatment arm received the sensitive CYP3A substrate midazolam on Day 1, followed by NBI-1065845 alone on Days 5-13; on Day 14, NBI-1065845 was administered with midazolam, then NBI-1065845 alone on Day 15. The oral contraceptive treatment arm received ethinyl estradiol-levonorgestrel on Day 1, then NBI-1065845 alone on Days 5-13; on Day 14, NBI-1065845 was administered with ethinyl estradiol-levonorgestrel, then NBI-1065845 alone on Days 15-17. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analyses. The midazolam treatment arm comprised 14 men and 4 women, of whom 16 completed the study. Sixteen of the 17 healthy women completed the oral contraceptive treatment arm. After multiple daily doses of NBI-1065845, the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) (90% confidence interval) for maximum observed concentration were: midazolam, 0.94 (0.79-1.13); ethinyl estradiol, 1.00 (0.87-1.15); and levonorgestrel, 0.99 (0.87-1.13). For area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to infinity, the GMRs were as follows: midazolam, 0.88 (0.78-0.98); and ethinyl estradiol, 1.01 (0.88-1.15). For levonorgestrel, the GMR for AUC from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration was 0.87 (0.78-0.96). These findings indicate that NBI-1065845 is not a CYP3A inducer and support its administration with CYP3A substrates. NBI-1065845 was generally well tolerated, with no new safety signals observed after coadministration of midazolam, ethinyl estradiol, or levonorgestrel.

Zibotentan Can Be Co-administered with Contraceptives Containing Ethinyl Estradiol and Levonorgestrel: A Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction Study.

The endothelin A receptor antagonist zibotentan, combined with the sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor dapagliflozin, is being investigated for the treatment of chronic kidney disease with high proteinuria. To allow women of childbearing potential access to this treatment, highly effective contraception is required and drug interactions compromising contraception reliability must be avoided. This study investigated the risk of pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between zibotentan and the contraceptives ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel. A single-sequence, within-participant comparison study was conducted in 24 healthy women of non-childbearing potential, comparing the PK of ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel alone and with zibotentan. Single oral doses of 0.06 mg ethinyl estradiol/0.3 mg levonorgestrel were administered on Days 1 and 15; zibotentan 10 mg was dosed orally, once-daily through Days 6-19. PK profiles were determined and ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel PK was compared between Day 1 and 15 based on geometric least-squares mean ratios of PK parameters, including maximum observed concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUCinf). Co-administration with zibotentan did not affect ethinyl estradiol PK (geometric mean ratio [90% confidence interval] Cmax 1.05 [0.99-1.11], AUCinf 1.00 [0.96-1.05]), while a weak interaction (increased exposure) was observed for levonorgestrel (Cmax 1.12 [1.02-1.23], AUCinf 1.30 [1.21-1.39]), which was regarded as without clinical relevance. Plasma exposure of ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel was not reduced by multiple-dose zibotentan. In conclusion, contraception containing ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel is regarded possible under zibotentan-containing treatments. This expands choices for women of childbearing potential, supporting diversity in the ZENITH High Proteinuria trial.

Assessment of the Effects of Abrocitinib on the Pharmacokinetics of Probe Substrates of Cytochrome P450 1A2, 2B6 and 2C19 Enzymes and Hormonal Oral Contraceptives in Healthy Individuals.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Abrocitinib is an oral small-molecule Janus kinase (JAK)-1 inhibitor approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. In vitro studies indicated that abrocitinib is a weak time-dependent inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19/3A and a weak inducer of CYP1A2/2B6/2C19/3A. To assess the potential effect of abrocitinib on concomitant medications, drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies were conducted for abrocitinib with sensitive probe substrates of these CYP enzymes. The impact of abrocitinib on hormonal oral contraceptives (ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel), as substrates of CYP3A and important concomitant medications for female patients, was also evaluated. METHODS: Three Phase 1 DDI studies were performed to assess the impact of abrocitinib 200 mg once daily (QD) on the probe substrates of: (1) 1A2 (caffeine), 2B6 (efavirenz) and 2C19 (omeprazole) in a cocktail study; (2) 3A (midazolam); and (3) 3A (oral contraceptives). RESULTS: After multiple doses of abrocitinib 200 mg QD, there is a lack of effect on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam, efavirenz and contraceptives. Abrocitinib increased the area under the concentration time curve from 0 to infinity (AUCinf) and the maximum concentration (Cmax) of omeprazole by approximately 189 and 134%, respectively. Abrocitinib increased the AUCinf of caffeine by 40% with lack of effect on Cmax. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the study results, abrocitinib is a moderate inhibitor of CYP2C19. Caution should be exercised when using abrocitinib concomitantly with narrow therapeutic index medicines that are primarily metabolized by CYP2C19 enzyme. Abrocitinib is a mild inhibitor of CYP1A2; however, the impact is not clinically relevant, and no general dose adjustment is recommended for CYP1A2 substrates. Abrocitinib does not inhibit CYP3A or induce CYP1A2/2B6/2C19/3A and does not affect the pharmacokinetics of contraceptives. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registration IDs: NCT03647670, NCT05067439, NCT03662516.

Development and verification of mechanistic vaginal absorption and metabolism model to predict systemic exposure after vaginal ring and gel application.

AIMS: The current work describes the development of mechanistic vaginal absorption and metabolism model within Simcyp Simulator to predict systemic concentrations following vaginal application of ring and gel formulations. METHODS: Vaginal and cervix physiology parameters were incorporated in the model development. The study highlights the model assumptions including simulation results comparing systemic concentrations of 5 different compounds, namely, dapivirine, tenofovir, lidocaine, ethinylestradiol and etonogestrel, administered as vaginal ring or gel. Due to lack of data, the vaginal absorption parameters were calculated based on assumptions or optimized. The model uses release rate/in vitro release profiles with formulation characteristics to predict drug mass transfer across vaginal tissue into the systemic circulation. RESULTS: For lidocaine and tenofovir vaginal gel, the predicted to observed AUC0-t and Cmax ratios were well within 2-fold error limits. The average fold error (AFE) and absolute AFE indicating bias and precision of predictions range from 0.62 to 1.61. For dapivirine, the pharmacokinetic parameters are under and overpredicted in some studies due to lack of formulation composition details and relevance of release rate used in ring model. The predicted to observed AUC0-t and Cmax ratios were well within 2-fold error limits for etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol vaginal ring (AFEs and absolute AFEs from 0.84 to 1.83). CONCLUSION: The current study provides first of its kind physiologically based pharmacokinetic framework integrating physiology, population and formulation data to carry out in silico mechanistic vaginal absorption studies, with the potential for virtual bioequivalence assessment in the future.

Midostaurin drug interaction profile: a comprehensive assessment of CYP3A, CYP2B6, and CYP2C8 drug substrates, and oral contraceptives in healthy participants.

PURPOSE: Midostaurin, approved for treating FLT-3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia and advanced systemic mastocytosis, is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 to two major metabolites, and may inhibit and/or induce CYP3A, CYP2B6, and CYP2C8. Two studies investigated the impact of midostaurin on CYP substrate drugs and oral contraceptives in healthy participants. METHODS: Using sentinel dosing for participants' safety, the effects of midostaurin at steady state following 25-day (Study 1) or 24-day (Study 2) dosing with 50 mg twice daily were evaluated on CYP substrates, midazolam (CYP3A4), bupropion (CYP2B6), and pioglitazone (CYP2C8) in Study 1; and monophasic oral contraceptives (containing ethinylestradiol [EES] and levonorgestrel [LVG]) in Study 2. RESULTS: In Study 1, midostaurin resulted in a 10% increase in midazolam peak plasma concentrations (Cmax), and 3-4% decrease in total exposures (AUC). Bupropion showed a 55% decrease in Cmax and 48-49% decrease in AUCs. Pioglitazone showed a 10% decrease in Cmax and 6% decrease in AUC. In Study 2, midostaurin resulted in a 26% increase in Cmax and 7-10% increase in AUC of EES; and a 19% increase in Cmax and 29-42% increase in AUC of LVG. Midostaurin 50 mg twice daily for 28 days ensured that steady-state concentrations of midostaurin and the active metabolites were achieved by the time of CYP substrate drugs or oral contraceptive dosing. No safety concerns were reported. CONCLUSION: Midostaurin neither inhibits nor induces CYP3A4 and CYP2C8, and weakly induces CYP2B6. Midostaurin at steady state has no clinically relevant PK interaction on hormonal contraceptives. All treatments were well tolerated.

Validation of 24-hour trough concentration as a proxy for intensive pharmacokinetic measurements for a combined oral contraceptive pill containing desogestrel.

OBJECTIVES: To confirm that 24-hour steady-state trough measurements (C24) are high-quality proxies for gold standard pharmacokinetic measurements (area under the curve [AUC]) of a combined oral contraceptive pill (COCP). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a 12-sample, 24-hour pharmacokinetic study in healthy reproductive-age females taking a COCP containing 0.15-mg desogestrel (DSG) and 30-µg ethinyl estradiol (EE). As DSG is a pro-drug for etonogestrel (ENG), we calculated correlations between steady-state C24 and 24-hour AUC values for both ENG and EE. RESULTS: Among 19 participants at steady state, C24 measurements were highly correlated with AUC for both ENG (r = 0.93; 95% CI 0.83-0.98) and EE (r = 0.87; 95% CI 0.68-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Steady-state 24-hour trough concentrations are high-quality proxies for gold standard pharmacokinetics of a DSG-containing COCP. IMPLICATIONS: Use of single-time trough concentration measurements at steady state provides excellent surrogate results for gold standard AUC values for both DSG and EE among COCP users. These findings support that large studies exploring interindividual variability in COCP pharmacokinetics can avoid the time- and resource-intensive costs associated with measuring AUC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05002738.

Effects of rimegepant 75 mg daily on the pharmacokinetics of a combined oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol and norgestimate in healthy female participants.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of single and multiple doses of rimegepant 75 mg dose on the pharmacokinetics of an oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol (EE)/norgestimate (NGM) in healthy females of childbearing potential or non-menopausal females with tubal ligation. BACKGROUND: Females of childbearing age experience the highest prevalence of migraine and frequently inquire about the concomitant use of anti-migraine medications and contraceptives. Rimegepant, a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, demonstrated efficacy and safety for treating an acute migraine attack and preventing migraine. METHODS: This open-label, single-center, phase 1, drug-drug interaction study explored the effects of rimegepant 75 mg daily dose on the pharmacokinetics of an oral contraceptive containing EE/NGM 0.035 mg/0.25 mg in healthy females of childbearing potential or non-menopausal females with tubal ligation. During cycles 1 and 2, participants received EE/NGM once daily for 21 days followed by placebo tablets with inactive ingredients for 7 days. Rimegepant was administered during only cycle 2 for 8 days, from days 12 through 19. The primary endpoint was the effect of single and multiple doses of rimegepant on the pharmacokinetics of EE and norelgestromin (NGMN), an active metabolite of NGM, at steady state, including area under the concentration-time curve for 1 dosing interval (AUC0-τ,ss ) and maximum observed concentration (Css[max] ). RESULTS: The study enrolled 25 participants, with pharmacokinetic data assessed for 20 participants. A single 75 mg dose of rimegepant co-administered with EE/NGM increased exposures of EE and NGMN by ≤16% (geometric mean ratio [GMR], 1.03; 90% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.06; and GMR, 1.16; 90% CI, 1.13-1.20, respectively). After 8 days of co-administering EE/NGM with rimegepant, EE pharmacokinetic parameters, AUC0-τ,ss and Css(max) , increased by 20% (GMR, 1.20; 90% CI, 1.16-1.25) and 34% (GMR, 1.34; 90% CI, 1.23-1.46), respectively, and NGMN pharmacokinetic parameters increased by 46% (GMR, 1.46; 90% CI, 1.39-1.52) and 40% (GMR, 1.40; 90% CI, 1.30-1.51), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The study identified modest elevations in overall EE and NGMN exposures after multiple doses of rimegepant, but these elevations are unlikely to be clinically relevant in healthy females with migraine.

Fostemsavir and ethinyl estradiol drug interaction: Clinical recommendations for co-administration.

OBJECTIVES: Fostemsavir, a prodrug of temsavir, is indicated for heavily treatment-experienced adults with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection, antiretroviral (ARV) intolerance, or safety considerations. Understanding drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is important in individuals taking fostemsavir with hormonal contraceptives or menopausal or gender-affirming hormonal therapies. METHODS: Effect of temsavir (active moiety) on the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol (EE) and norethindrone (NET) was evaluated in an open-label, single-sequence, four-cycle, four-treatment study in 26 healthy female participants (study 206279, NCT02480881). Relevant ARV-contraceptive interaction studies and guideline recommendations were reviewed; that information was then applied to other contraceptive methods and hormone-based therapies to predict the impact of fostemsavir co-administration. RESULTS: Temsavir increased EE concentrations by 40% and had no effect on NET concentrations. Fostemsavir co-administration with hormone therapy is not expected to impact hormone treatment efficacy. Fostemsavir did not impact progestin; therefore, progestin-only and non-hormonal contraceptives will not be impacted by fostemsavir. Recommendations for co-administration of fostemsavir and hormonal contraceptives or menopausal or gender-affirming hormone therapies are based upon known and predicted DDIs, ensuring adequate hormonal concentrations to maintain the target effect. CONCLUSIONS: Applying the results of Study 206279 and other relevant ARV-contraceptive studies, we recommend that when co-administering fostemsavir with combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and other oestrogen-based therapies, EE dose should not exceed 30 µg or equivalent, and caution is advised in the case of individuals with risk factors for thromboembolic events. Other oestrogen-based therapies may be co-administered with fostemsavir, with monitoring of oestrogen concentrations and appropriate dose adjustments. No impact of fostemsavir on COC efficacy is expected.

Determining the Exposure Threshold for Levonorgestrel Efficacy Using an Integrated Model Based Meta-Analysis Approach.

Combined oral contraceptive pills are the most commonly used hormonal contraceptives for the prevention of unintended pregnancies in United States. They consist of a progestin (e.g., levonorgestrel (LNG)) and an estrogen component, typically ethinyl estradiol (EE). In addition to adherence issues, drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and obesity (women with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 ) are prime suspects for decreased LNG efficacy. Therefore, we developed an integrated physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling and model-based meta-analysis approach to determine LNG's efficacy threshold concentrations and to evaluate the impact of DDIs and obesity on the efficacy of LNG-containing hormonal contraceptives (HCs). Based on this approach, co-administration of strong CYP3A4 inducers and LNG-containing HCs (LNG150: LNG 150 µg + EE 30 µg and LNG100: LNG 100 µg + EE 20 µg) resulted in a predicted clinically relevant decrease of LNG plasma exposure (women with BMI < 25 kg/m2 : 50-65%; obese women: 70-75%). Following administration of LNG150 or LNG100 in the presence of a CYP3A4 inducer, there was an increase in mean Pearl Index of 1.2-1.30 and 1.80-2.10, respectively, in women with BMI < 25 kg/m2 (incidence rate ratios (IRRs): 1.7-2.2), whereas it ranged from 1.6-1.80 and 2.40-2.85 in obese women (IRR: 2.2-3.0), respectively. Our results suggest that the use of backup or alternate methods of contraception is not necessarily required for oral LNG + EE formulations except within circumstances of both obesity and strong CYP3A4 inducer concomitance following administration of LNG100.

A Drug-Drug Interaction Study to Investigate the Effect of Nintedanib on the Pharmacokinetics of Microgynon (Ethinylestradiol and Levonorgestrel) in Female Patients with Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Nintedanib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and other chronic fibrosing ILDs with a progressive phenotype. As nintedanib may cause foetal harm, patients taking nintedanib should avoid pregnancy. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of nintedanib co-administration on the pharmacokinetics of Microgynon (ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel) in female patients with SSc-ILD. METHODS: This was an open-label, two-period, fixed-sequence, drug-drug interaction study. Female patients with SSc and ≥ 10% extent of fibrotic ILD on a high-resolution computed tomography scan were eligible to participate. In Period 1, patients received one Microgynon tablet (ethinylestradiol 30 µg and levonorgestrel 150 µg) ≥ 3 days before the first administration of nintedanib in Period 2. In Period 2, patients received one Microgynon tablet following intake of nintedanib 150 mg twice daily for ≥ 10 consecutive days. The primary pharmacokinetic endpoints were the areas under the plasma concentration-time curve of ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel over the time interval from 0 to the last quantifiable data point (AUC0-tz) and the maximum measured concentrations of ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel in plasma (Cmax). The secondary pharmacokinetic endpoint was the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞). The relative exposures of ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel when administered alone and in combination with nintedanib were assessed using an ANOVA model. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were treated. Pharmacokinetic data from 15 patients were analysed. Plasma concentration-time profiles of ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel were similar following administration of Microgynon before and after administration of nintedanib for ≥ 10 consecutive days. Adjusted geometric mean (gMean) ratios [90% confidence intervals (CIs)] for AUC0‒tz (101.4% [92.8, 110.7]) and AUC0‒∞ (101.2% [94.0, 109.1]) indicated that there was no difference in total ethinylestradiol exposure when Microgynon was administered before or after administration of nintedanib. The adjusted gMean ratio for Cmax of ethinylestradiol (116.7% [90% CI 107.6, 126.5]) indicated an increase in peak exposure in the presence of nintedanib. Adjusted gMean ratios [90% CIs] for AUC0-tz (96.4% [91.5, 101.6]) and Cmax (100.9% [89.9, 113.2]) indicated that there was no difference in total or peak levonorgestrel exposure when Microgynon was administered before or after administration of nintedanib. The adjusted gMean ratio for AUC0‒∞ of levonorgestrel indicated a decrease in total exposure in the presence of nintedanib (88.1% [90% CI 80.0, 97.0]). CONCLUSION: Pharmacokinetic data indicate that there is no relevant effect of nintedanib on plasma exposure to ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel in female patients with SSc-ILD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03675581.

A phase 1, open-label, drug-drug interaction study of rucaparib with rosuvastatin and oral contraceptives in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: This study aimed at evaluating the effect of rucaparib on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin and oral contraceptives in patients with advanced solid tumors and the safety of rucaparib with and without coadministration of rosuvastatin or oral contraceptives. METHODS: Patients received single doses of oral rosuvastatin 20 mg (Arm A) or oral contraceptives ethinylestradiol 30 µg + levonorgestrel 150 µg (Arm B) on days 1 and 19 and continuous doses of rucaparib 600 mg BID from day 5 to 23. Serial blood samples were collected with and without rucaparib for pharmacokinetic analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (n = 18 each arm) were enrolled and received at least 1 dose of study drug. In the drug-drug interaction analysis (n = 15 each arm), the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of maximum concentration (Cmax) with and without rucaparib was 1.29 for rosuvastatin, 1.09 for ethinylestradiol, and 1.19 for levonorgestrel. GMR of area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to last quantifiable measurement (AUC0-last) was 1.34 for rosuvastatin, 1.43 for ethinylestradiol, and 1.56 for levonorgestrel. There was no increase in frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) when rucaparib was given with either of the probe drugs. In both arms, most TEAEs were mild in severity and considered unrelated to study treatment. CONCLUSION: Rucaparib 600 mg BID weakly increased the plasma exposure to rosuvastatin or oral contraceptives. Rucaparib safety profile when coadministered with rosuvastatin or oral contraceptives was consistent with that of rucaparib monotherapy. Dose adjustments of rosuvastatin and oral contraceptives are not necessary when coadministered with rucaparib. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03954366; Date of registration May 17, 2019.

Effects of Lemborexant on the Pharmacokinetics of Oral Contraceptives: Results From a Phase 1 Drug-Drug Interaction Study in Healthy Females.

Lemborexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist approved in multiple countries including the United States, Canada, and Japan for the treatment of insomnia in adults. As women of childbearing potential may be prescribed insomnia drugs, a drug-drug interaction study was conducted. This single-center, open-label, fixed-sequence study examined potential drug-drug interactions between lemborexant and an oral contraceptive (OC) in healthy females (18-44 years, n = 20). The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of lemborexant 10 mg (at steady state) on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of OC (0.03 mg ethinyl estradiol and 1.5 mg norethindrone acetate), assess the effect of a single dose of OC on lemborexant pharmacokinetics, and evaluate safety and tolerability of lemborexant and OC coadministration. Ethinyl estradiol maximum plasma drug concentration was not altered by lemborexant coadministration; area under the curve from zero time to the last quantifiable concentration was slightly increased, by 13%. No clinically relevant effects on norethindrone acetate pharmacokinetics were observed. Coadministration of OC with lemborexant had no clinically relevant effect on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of lemborexant. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile. These results support the conclusion that lemborexant and OC can be coadministered without dose adjustment.

Lack of Drug-Drug Interaction Between Filgotinib, a Selective JAK1 Inhibitor, and Oral Hormonal Contraceptives Levonorgestrel/Ethinyl Estradiol in Healthy Volunteers.

Filgotinib (FIL) is a potent and selective JAK1 inhibitor in clinical development for treatment of severe inflammatory diseases. A drug-drug interaction study to evaluate the potential effect of FIL on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the oral contraceptive levonorgestrel (LEVO)/ethinyl estradiol (EE) was conducted. This was a phase 1, open-label, randomized, crossover study in healthy female subjects (N = 24). Subjects received a single dose of LEVO (150 µg)/EE (30 µg) alone (reference), or in combination with multiple-dose FIL (200 mg once daily for 15 days; test). Intensive PK sampling was conducted, and safety was assessed throughout the study. PK interactions were evaluated using 90% confidence intervals of the geometric least squares mean ratios of the test versus reference treatments. All 24 subjects enrolled completed study treatments. Coadministration of FIL with the oral contraceptive did not alter the PK of LEVO and EE; the 90% confidence intervals of the geometric least squares mean ratios were contained within bioequivalence bounds (80%-125%). Exposures of FIL were consistent with observed clinical exposure data. Study treatments were generally well tolerated. All adverse events were mild. Coadministration with FIL did not alter the PK of LEVO/EE, and hormonal contraceptives can serve as an effective contraception method for subjects on FIL treatment.

Uptake, accumulation, and translocation mechanisms of steroid estrogens in plants.

Applying sewage sludge or animal manure onto agricultural land can result in estrogen pollution, which increases the risk of human exposure to steroid estrogens (SEs) via the food chain. However, the uptake and accumulation mechanism of SEs by plants is still unclear. In this study, the uptake, accumulation, and translocation of 17ß-E2, a representative SE, were investigated through a series of wheat hydroponic experiments. Various inhibitors were applied to explore the uptake pathways of 17ß-E2 by wheat. In addition, the effects of exposure concentrations, coexisting 17α-ethynylestradiol (EE2) and plant properties on the uptake of 17ß-E2 were examined. The results indicated that the accumulation of 17ß-E2 in wheat roots mainly resulted from adsorption and active uptake that involved aquaporins and anion channels transport. The chlorophyll and protein contents of plants were positively correlated with the uptake of 17ß-E2, whereas competitive inhibition occurred when 17ß-E2 and EE2 coexisted in the same solution. Nevertheless, the results of a split-root experiment showed that 17ß-E2 absorbed by wheat could further migrate in plant via long-distance transport and ultimately was discharged from plants, suggesting that 17ß-E2 was still at risk of being released even though it had been absorbed by plants. These results could provide valuable insights into the risk assessment and risk control of the uptake of SEs by plants.

Quantitative Assessment of Levonorgestrel Binding Partner Interplay and Drug-Drug Interactions Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.

Levonorgestrel (LNG) is the active moiety in many hormonal contraceptive formulations. It is typically coformulated with ethinyl estradiol (EE) to decrease intermenstrual bleeding. Due to its widespread use and CYP3A4-mediated metabolism, there is concern regarding drug-drug interactions (DDIs), particularly a suboptimal LNG exposure when co-administered with CYP3A4 inducers, potentially leading to unintended pregnancies. The goal of this analysis was to determine the impact of DDIs on the systemic exposure of LNG. To this end, we developed and verified a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for LNG in PK-Sim (version 8.0) accounting for the impact of EE and body mass index (BMI) on LNG's binding to sex-hormone binding globulin. Model parameters were optimized following intravenous and oral administration of 0.09 mg LNG. The combined LNG-EE PBPK model was verified regarding CYP3A4-mediated interaction by comparing to published clinical DDI study data with carbamazepine, rifampicin, and efavirenz (CYP3A4 inducers). Once verified, the model was applied to predict systemic LNG exposure in normal BMI and obese women (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 ) with and without co-administration of itraconazole (competitive CYP3A4 inhibitor) and clarithromycin (mechanism-based CYP3A4 inhibitor). Total and free LNG exposures, when co-administered with EE, decreased 2-fold in the presence of rifampin, whereas they increased 1.5-fold in the presence of itraconazole. Although changes in total and unbound exposure were decreased in obese women compared with normal BMI women, the relative impact of DDIs on LNG exposure was similar between both groups.

Ibrutinib does not have clinically relevant interactions with oral contraceptives or substrates of CYP3A and CYP2B6.

Ibrutinib may inhibit intestinal CYP3A4 and induce CYP2B6 and/or CYP3A. Secondary to potential induction, ibrutinib may reduce the exposure and effectiveness of oral contraceptives (OCs). This phase I study evaluated the effect of ibrutinib on the pharmacokinetics of the CYP2B6 substrate bupropion, CYP3A substrate midazolam, and OCs ethinylestradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LN). Female patients (N = 22) with B-cell malignancies received single doses of EE/LN (30/150 µg) and bupropion/midazolam (75/2 mg) during a pretreatment phase on days 1 and 3, respectively (before starting ibrutinib on day 8), and again after ibrutinib 560 mg/day for ≥ 2 weeks. Intestinal CYP3A inhibition was assessed on day 8 (single-dose ibrutinib plus single-dose midazolam). Systemic induction was assessed at steady-state on days 22 (EE/LN plus ibrutinib) and 24 (bupropion/midazolam plus ibrutinib). The geometric mean ratios (GMRs; test/reference) for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) were derived using linear mixed-effects models (90% confidence interval within 80%-125% indicated no interaction). On day 8, the GMR for midazolam exposure with ibrutinib coadministration was ≤ 20% lower than the reference, indicating lack of intestinal CYP3A4 inhibition. At ibrutinib steady-state, the Cmax and AUC of EE were 33% higher than the reference, which was not considered clinically relevant. No substantial changes were noted for LN, midazolam, or bupropion. No unexpected safety findings were observed. A single dose of ibrutinib did not inhibit intestinal CYP3A4, and repeated administration did not induce CYP3A4/2B6, as assessed using EE, LN, midazolam, and bupropion.

The Effects of Weak and Strong CYP3A Induction by Rifampicin on the Pharmacokinetics of Five Progestins and Ethinylestradiol Compared to Midazolam.

It is known that co-administration of CYP3A inducers may decrease the effectiveness of oral contraceptives containing progestins as mono-preparations or combined with ethinylestradiol. In a randomized clinical drug-drug interaction study, we investigated the effects of CYP3A induction on the pharmacokinetics of commonly used progestins and ethinylestradiol. Rifampicin was used to induce CYP3A. The progestins chosen as victim drugs were levonorgestrel, norethindrone, desogestrel, and dienogest as mono-products, and drospirenone combined with ethinylestradiol. Postmenopausal women (n = 12-14 per treatment group) received, in fixed sequence, a single dose of the victim drug plus midazolam without rifampicin, with rifampicin 10 mg/day (weak induction), and with rifampicin 600 mg/day (strong induction). The effects on progestin exposure were compared with the effects on midazolam exposure (as a benchmark). Unbound concentrations were evaluated for drugs binding to sex hormone binding globulin. Weak CYP3A induction, as confirmed by a mean decrease in midazolam exposure by 46%, resulted in minor changes in progestin exposure (mean decreases: 15-37%). Strong CYP3A induction, in contrast, resulted in mean decreases by 57-90% (mean decrease in midazolam exposure: 86%). Namely, the magnitude of the observed induction effects varied from weak to strong. Our data might provide an impetus to revisit the currently applied clinical recommendations for oral contraceptives, especially for levonorgestrel and norethindrone-containing products, and they might give an indication as to which progestin could be used, if requested, by women taking weak CYP3A inducers-although it is acknowledged that the exact exposure-response relationship for contraceptive efficacy is currently unclear for most progestins.