Evaluation of residual bone mass of the mandibular third molar and the risk of mandibular fracture.

BACKGROUND: A quantification of the residual bone mass of the mandible (B/A) was utilized in this study to examine the correlation between mandibular fracture and residual bone mass. To improve the clinical utilization rate and reduce the incidence of iatrogenic mandibular fractures, the B/A ratio calculation should be simplified. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were collected from the Yanbian University Hospital on 175 cases of mandibular fracture with third molar (M3), 67 normal cases without fractures and 20 cases of impacted teeth extraction. Twenty cases of iatrogenic mandibular fracture were collected, and the case records and panoramic radiographs of the patients were recorded. RESULTS: The average B/A ratio of mandibular angle fracture group was 0.61±0.10.The value of B/A was found to be statistically significant in terms of whether M3 emerged from alveolar bone (P = 0.001), location (horizontal P < 0.001, vertical P < 0.001), the degree of impaction (P < 0.001), the number of roots (P < 0.001), the difference in impaction (P < 0.001), and the fracture type (P = 0.002). The average B/A ratio of normal group was 0.62±0.10. In the statistical results of the B/A value of normal patients, M3 involving alveolar bone (P < 0.001), position classification (P < 0.05), degree of impaction (P < 0.001) and presence or absence of a root (P < 0.05) were statistically significant. The average B/A ratio of iatrogenic mandibular angle fracture group was 0.28±0.08. The average B/A ratio of the extraction group for impacted teeth was 0.62 ± 0.09. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high risk of mandibular angle fracture when the (B/A) value of the residual bone height (B) in the mandibular M3 area compared to the mandibular bone height (A) in the M3 area is less than 0.4.

Non-Surgical Site-Related Complications in Mandibular Fracture Surgery - A Problem of Elderly Patients?

BACKGROUND: Scientific evidence of nonsurgical site-related complications in mandibular fracture patients is limited. PURPOSE: The purpose was to measure the frequency of nonsurgical site complications in patients with mandible fractures, describe the types of complications, and identify the risk factors associated with these complications. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Helsinki University hospital between 2018 and 2021. Patients undergoing surgery with open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular fracture(s) were evaluated. Patients under 16 years of age were excluded. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: Primary predictor variable was age. Patient-related predictor variables were sex, long-term disease(s), smoking, and alcohol and/or drug abuse. Injury and fracture-related variables were injury mechanism, type and site of facture, combined craniofacial fracture(s), and associated injury(s). MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE(S): The primary outcome variable was nonsurgical site-related postoperative complication. The secondary outcome variable was type of complication. COVARIATES: Not applicable. ANALYSES: The main outcome variable was cross tabulated for pairwise comparisons with predictor variables. Multivariate logistic regression was performed for statistically significant (P < .05) variables. RESULTS: The data included 314 patients (age range: 16 to 89 years; mean age: 38 years old; median age: 33 years old); most (78.3%) were men. Nonsurgical site-related postoperative complications occurred in 6.7% of patients. The most common complication type was pulmonary complication (36.0%), followed by urinary complication (20.0%) and general infection (16.0%). Nonsurgical site-related postoperative complications were most likely to occur in patients who were elderly (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.55; 95% CI 1.92 to 16.21; P = .002), had combined craniofacial fractures (aOR 2.92; 95% CI 1.06 to 8.03; P = .038), and abused alcohol or drugs (aOR 4.51; 95% CI 1.70 to 11.96; P = .003). Pulmonary complications occurred more often in elderly patients, whereas urinary complications were more common in younger patients. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The types of nonsurgical site complications in mandibular fracture patients increase and vary according to the patient's age. Awareness of possible complications related to different age groups helps anticipate and identify these in clinical work, and to consider the overall treatment of the patient beyond the fracture.

The profile of patients with maxillofacial trauma due to interpersonal violence treated in a hospital emergency room.

AIM: This study evaluated records of patients with maxillofacial trauma due to interpersonal violence (IPV) being treated in the emergency room of a level I trauma center hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data of patients with maxillofacial trauma due to IPV recorded between January 2019 and December 2019 were retrospectively examined. Personal data, days on which they experienced IPV, and the type of maxillofacial trauma sustained were extracted and statistically analyzed (p < .050). RESULTS: During the analysis, 1034 patients with maxillofacial trauma were identified; of these patients, 292 (28.2%) who experienced trauma due to IPV were included in this study. There was a mean age of 32.6 years and the most common type of trauma was soft tissue injuries (38.7%). Mandible and nose fractures were more prevalent in males and females, respectively. Our data, when compared with other studies on maxillofacial trauma due to IPV, showed a lower prevalence and male-to-female ratio, and a higher presence of dentoalveolar trauma. Additionally, our data when compared with studies on maxillofacial trauma due to other causes showed lower mean age and male-to-female ratios, and a higher occurrence of nose fractures differing from the predominance of mandibular fractures. CONCLUSION: Oral and maxillofacial surgeons must be able to suspect and identify cases due to IPV among their patients with trauma. With our results, although each case has its individuality, we can suggest that cases of maxillofacial trauma in young, female, and nasal fracture patients may be suspicious for IPV.

Mandibular condylar fractures: a 5-year retrospective analysis comparing open versus closed reduction.

BACKGROUND: Mandibular fractures are common facial fractures, and contemporary management of mandibular condylar fractures is controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients who sustained a mandibular condylar fracture between 2016 and 2020, who were managed by either open or closed techniques. The outcomes of this study were: post-operative facial nerve function, occlusion, and maximal mouth opening. METHODS: This study is a retrospective multicentre cohort study which assessed clinical records for 246 patients with mandibular condyle fractures in three hospitals in Perth, Western Australia. The primary outcome measure was changes in post-operative facial nerve function. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-two patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and 114 patients had closed management. The overall rate of temporary facial nerve injury following ORIF was 3.28%. The overall rate of permanent facial nerve injury was 0.82%. Sialocoele occurred in 2.46% of all patients who underwent ORIF. 6.14% of patients had persisting malocclusion across both groups. There was a statistically significant association between the degree of fragment shortening and facial nerve injury (P = 0.0063), with more facial nerve changes in the group with 5 mm or greater of fragment shortening. CONCLUSIONS: There is still significant debate over the management of mandibular condylar injuries. This study demonstrates a similar rate of temporary and permanent facial nerve injury as previously described, as well as a similar rate of sialocoele occurrence. Further prospective studies may provide clarity about important characteristics that will help guide decision making for mandibular condylar fractures.

The Use of Combined Microplate And Miniplate in the Fixation of the Mandibular Fractures (A Randomized Clinical Trial).

The study group patients have been treated with 1.6 microplates at the superior border and 2.0 miniplate at the inferior border to evaluate its efficacy in the fixation of symphyseal and parasymphyseal fractures using this technique. The control patients were treated with two 2.0 plates. The stability was assessed using computed tomography immediately performed postoperatively and after 6 months. Assessment of the change in the intercanine distance using the Student T test was statistically Non Significant ( P value 0.34). The change of intercanine distance in the study was 0.04 ± 0.05 mm, compared with that of the control, which was 0.01 ± 0.03 mm. Assessment of change in intermental foramina distance was statistically NS ( P value = 0.06). The average difference in intermental foramina distance in the study was 0.04 ± 0.05 mm, compared with the control, which was 0.002 ± 0.004 mm. Based on the findings of the current study, the authors recommend the use of microplates combined with miniplates in the correction of both symphyseal and parasymphyseal fractures successfully.

Analysis of postoperative complications related to cannabis and tobacco usage in patients undergoing mandible facial fracture surgeries.

BACKGROUND: Cannabis is the third most used controlled substance in the world. Despite its widespread use, minimal research investigates cannabis usage in patients undergoing facial fracture surgeries. This study aimed to evaluate patterns of postoperative complications related to cannabis and tobacco usage after mandible fracture surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PearlDiver™, a commercially available healthcare database, was used to identify patients endorsing the use of cannabis, tobacco, or both who underwent mandible fracture surgeries for cross-sectional analysis. The study population was categorized into groups using the Classification of Diseases, 9th revision (ICD-9), ICD-10, and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. A chi-square analysis was performed to assess the influence of cannabis and tobacco use on postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 8288 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 72 patients with cannabis-only usage, 914 patients with cannabis and tobacco usage, 3236 patients with tobacco-only usage, and 4066 in the control group. For patients using only cannabis, there was not an increased risk of developing postoperative complications compared with the control population. Patients with concurrent cannabis and tobacco usage and those with tobacco-only usage had an increased risk of surgical site infection, facial nonunion, facial abscess, debridement, and malocclusion after surgical repair of mandibular facial fracture. CONCLUSION: Patients with tobacco-only as well as cannabis and tobacco usage had an increased risk of all postoperative complications, except malocclusion, compared with cannabis-only. Based on the results of this study, it is recommended that healthcare providers consider a patient's history of tobacco use when planning and performing surgical treatment for traumatic mandible fractures.

External mandibular fixation for gunshot fractures: report of 2 cases.

High-energy ballistic injuries may cause comminuted facial fractures. Treatment of such fractures might be challenging because of in-fection and soft- and hard-tissue loss. These cases may not be amenable to open reduction and internal fixation. We present 2 cases of gunshot fractures, for which external fixation was used as a surgical step before definitive treatment. With the use of external fixation, existing infection had been controlled and soft tissues had been restored, which allowed oral rehabilitation with reconstruction plates and autogenous bone grafting, if needed.

Manual versus rigid intraoperative maxillo-mandibular fixation in the surgical management of mandibular fractures: A European prospective analysis.

PURPOSE: Intraoperative stabilisation of bony fragments with maxillo-mandibular fixation (MMF) is an essential step in the surgical treatment of mandibular fractures that are treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The MMF can be performed with or without wire-based methods, rigid or manual MMF, respectively. The aim of this study was to compare the use of manual versus rigid MMF, in terms of occlusal outcomes and infective complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multi-centric prospective study involved 12 European maxillofacial centres and included adult patients (age ≥16 years) with mandibular fractures treated with ORIF. The following data were collected: age, gender, pre-trauma dental status (dentate or partially dentate), cause of injury, fracture site, associated facial fractures, surgical approach, modality of intraoperative MMF (manual or rigid), outcome (minor/major malocclusions and infective complications) and revision surgeries. The main outcome was malocclusion at 6 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Between May 1, 2021 and April 30, 2022, 319 patients-257 males and 62 females (median age, 28 years)-with mandibular fractures (185 single, 116 double and 18 triple fractures) were hospitalised and treated with ORIF. Intraoperative MMF was performed manually on 112 (35%) patients and with rigid MMF on 207 (65%) patients. The study variables did not differ significantly between the two groups, except for age. Minor occlusion disturbances were observed in 4 (3.6%) patients in the manual MMF group and in 10 (4.8%) patients in the rigid MMF group (p > .05). In the rigid MMF group, only one case of major malocclusion required a revision surgery. Infective complications involved 3.6% and 5.8% of patients in the manual and rigid MMF group, respectively (p > .05). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative MMF was performed manually in nearly one third of the patients, with wide variability among the centres and no difference observed in terms of number, site and displacement of fractures. No significant difference was found in terms of postoperative malocclusion among patients treated with manual or rigid MMF. This suggests that both techniques were equally effective in providing intraoperative MMF.

Impact of patient-related factors on complications when treating mandibular fractures by load-sharing and load-bearing osteosynthesis.

The decision about the choice of load-sharing (LS) or load-bearing (LB) osteosynthesis is determined by an interplay of fracture-related and patient-related factors. In some situations a similar fracture in two different patients may be treated successfully by either of these methods. Our aim was to identify preoperative patient-related factors that may assist in deciding which form of osteosynthesis is employed. All adult patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular fractures (excluding condyle) between 1 October 2018 and 1 June 2021 were retrospectively identified. The odds of developing postoperative complications and requiring a return to theatre (RTT) were calculated for each method of fixation together with the following patient factors: smoking, excess alcohol, substance misuse, and severe mental health issues. Of 337 fractures treated using LS principles, 27 (8%) developed complications, of which 20 (6%) required a RTT for repeat osteosynthesis. Of 74 fractures treated using LB principles, seven (10%) developed complications and two (3%) required a RTT for repeat osteosynthesis. The only patient factor that had statistically significant increased odds of a complication requiring RTT was LS osteosynthesis in patients who admitted drinking excess alcohol (OR = 7.83, p = 0.00, 95% CI = 3.13 to 19.60). Complications when treating mandibular fractures are rarely reported in the literature, and lack standardisation in their clinical significance. Figures generally represent overall numbers of patients, whereas the number of individual fractures treated is more accurate. In our study complications occurred in 8% of treated fractures and 10% of patients. The RTT rate was 7% of patients, which compares favourably with a recently stated standard of 10% of patients, as suggested by the Getting it Right First Time (GIRFT) report.

Infectious complications in compound mandibular fractures undergoing a delayed surgical intervention - a prospective observational study.

The aim of this prospective study was to analyse if a delay in the time from injury to definitive surgical intervention of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of compound mandibular fractures predisposed to an increase in postoperative infectious complications. ORIF beyond 72 hours from injury was considered to be delayed intervention. Postoperative surgical site infections (SSI) and non-infectious complications (NIC) were recorded. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the delay in ORIF with SSI. The chi squared test/Fisher's exact test was used to find the association of the infectious complication status with predetermined risk factors. Eighty-three patients underwent a delayed ORIF with a median (range) of 8 (4-19) days. SSI was documented in eight patients (9.6%) and could be managed as outpatient medical and surgical intervention. Two patients needed repeat surgical intervention due to non-union of the fracture. The median (range) time to ORIF was 6.5 (5-12) days in patients who developed SSI; the Mann-Whitney U test did not show a statistically significant association between delayed ORIF and SSI (p = 0.7). The univariate analysis did not establish a significant relationship between SSI and predetermined risk factors. The delay to definitive surgical intervention was not observed to be an independent attributing factor in postoperative infectious complications of compound mandibular fractures.

Evaluation of the pattern of fracture formation from trauma to the human mandible with finite element analysis. Part 2: The corpus and the angle regions.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although the mandible is the largest and strongest bone of the facial skeleton, it is frequently broken. The fracture location in the mandible depends on the biomechanical features, direction and angle of the trauma, and masticatory muscles. This study aimed to evaluate the stresses caused by trauma to the corpus and angle regions from different angles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After computer-based mandible models were created using finite element analysis, a force of 2000 Newton(N) was simulated with the mouth open or closed to the corpus and the angle. To the corpus: at 90° (Model 1) in the lateromedial direction, 45° (Model 2) in the lateromedial-inferosuperior direction, and 90° (Model 3) in the inferosuperior direction. To angle: 90° (Model 4) in the lateromedial direction and 45° (Model 5) in the lateromedial-inferosuperior direction. The resulting stress intensity was assessed using FEA. RESULTS: Following the simulated forces, the maximum stress in the mandible occurred in the condylar region, except in Model 3 (Left(L)Corpus2[36 megapascals(MPa)]) in the mouth-closed condition. After traumas in Model 1 (open-mouth: LCondyle2[547 MPa]) and Model 4 (closed-mouth: LCondyle2[607 MPa]), higher stress values occurred in the condyle. In the mouth open-closed state, there was no significant stress change in the condyle region in Model 1 (open-mouth: LCondyle2[547 MPa], closed-mouth:LCondyle2[546 MPa]) or in Model 2 (open mouth: Right(R)Condyle2[431 MPa], closed-mouth:LCondyle2[439 MPa]). In Model 3, lower stress values occurred in the closed-mouth rather than the open-mouth (LCondyle1[167 MPa]) state. In Models 4 and 5, the stress values increased in the mouth-closed condition compared with the mouth-open condition. CONCLUSIONS: Stress in the mandible is affected by the location of the trauma and the angle of incidence of the blow. In trauma to both the corpus and the angle, the most common area to be fractured is the condyle.

Challenges in the Head and Neck Department in the Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Patients Presenting to a Single Tertiary Hospital of Somalia With Extreme War Injuries.

In this study, the authors aimed to share their experience with 46 patients who were wounded due to terrorism and war in Somalia. The authors also evaluated the etiological diversity of terror-related and war-related injuries. The study included 46 patients treated at the 150-bed Turkey-Somalia Tertiary Hospital between 2019 and 2021. The authors reviewed medical records including data regarding age, sex, trauma etiology, and type of fracture and trauma. For all patients, surgical technique and plate and screw applications were recorded. The authors also assessed complications and outcomes for the patients. The study included 5 women (10.9%) and 41 men (89.1%). The mean age was 30.36 years. It was found that 2 patients (4.35%) presented to the emergency department with stab injuries, 33 patients with blast injuries from improvised explosive devices (71.73%), and 11 patients with firearm injuries. There were 31 patients with maxillary and mandibular fractures, 17 of which had both maxillary and mandibular fractures. There were 14 patients with maxillary fracture alone, including 3 patients with tripod fracture and 7 patients with inferior and lateral rim fracture. There was a mandibular fracture in 17 patients, including 5 patients with parasymphysis fracture, 7 patients with ramus fracture, and 5 patients with multifocal comminuted fracture. It is a challenging process to treat terror-related injuries in our tertiary hospital in Somalia, where all resources are imported from foreign countries. In such settings, authorities should make protective equipment obligatory to prevent civil and military casualties. Trauma hospitals and experienced trauma surgeons should be available.

Evaluation of the pattern of fracture formation from trauma to the human mandible with finite element analysis. Part 1: Symphysis region.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The mandible is the largest, strongest bone in the maxillofacial region. When a fracture occurs in the mandible, its location depends on several factors: the direction of the trauma, the angle of the trauma, masticatory muscles and the quality of the bone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the stresses caused by trauma to the symphysis region from different angles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computer-based mandible models were created, and a 2000 N force was applied to the symphysis at three different angles using finite element analysis. Six trauma situations were simulated with the mouth open or closed. Forces were applied to the symphysis at 90° (Model 1) in the anteroposterior direction, 45° (Model 2) in the anteroposterior-inferosuperior direction and 90° (Model 3) in the inferosuperior direction, when the mouth was open or closed. The resulting stress intensity was assessed using finite element analysis. RESULTS: As a result of trauma applied to the symphysis region, maximum stresses were found where the impact originated and at the condyle region (Model 2, open mouth: condyle 1 [1172 MPa]). The open mouth position caused higher stress values than the closed mouth position (Model 2, open mouth: condyle 1 [1172 MPa]; closed mouth: symphysis 4 [82 MPa]). The Model 2, open-mouth state (Model 2, open mouth: condyle 1 [1172 MPa]) sustained higher stresses than all the other models. CONCLUSION: The stress values in the mandible were affected by the force applied to the symphysis region, the angle of impact arrival and the open or closed state of the mouth. Keeping the mouth closed at the time of trauma reduced the stress value. A closed mouth during trauma directed at the symphysis reduced the possibility of mandible fractures.

Pediatric mandibular fractures: Surgical management and outcomes in the deciduous, mixed and permanent dentitions.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Mandibular fractures are the most frequent type of pediatric facial traumatic injury, but their treatment remains controversial. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the surgical treatment and long-term outcomes of dentate mandibular fractures in children and adolescents. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with mandibular fractures in the dentate area who were surgically treated in the period from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2020, were included. The following data were collected: age, gender, cause and mechanism of injury, fracture site and type, associated maxillofacial fractures, the timing of surgical treatment, Facial Injury Severity Scale (FISS) score, surgical approach, number and thickness of plates, hospitalization stay and outcome. Patients were divided into three groups: deciduous (≤6 years, group A), mixed (7-12 years, group B), and permanent (13-18 years, group C) dentitions. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software. RESULTS: During the study 91 patients (male: female ratio, 3.8:1), 4 in group A, 12 in group B, and 75 in group C, with 65 single and 52 double fractures were included. An intraoral approach was used in 87% of patients. In group C, 90% of patients were treated with fixation schemes consistent with those suggested in the literature for adults, versus 75% in groups A and B. Median follow-up time was 20 months. No tooth germ injury or facial asymmetry was observed and only six group C patients had post-operative malocclusions. Hardware removal occurred in 22% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: This 20-year retrospective study shows that open reduction and internal fixation of pediatric dentate mandibular fractures caused no tooth germ damage or disturbances of mandibular growth in any dentition stage. Internal fixation schemes were similar to those used for adults, although it was necessary to adapt hardware size and position according to tooth and patient age.

Facial Fractures in Indigenous and Non-indigenous Populations of South Australia.

INTRODUCTION: Maxillofacial trauma in indigenous populations is complex with sociocultural factors, access to health care, and poorer general health issues that impact outcomes. Assaults and road traffic accidents are disproportionately experienced by indigenous persons compared with non-indigenous. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted from January 2012 to January 2017 at the Women and Children's Hospital and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide. All maxillofacial fractures that attended or were referred to the unit were included in this study. The primary objective was to analyze epidemiological trends of facial fractures and clinical outcomes in the South Australian indigenous and non-indigenous populations. RESULTS: Maxillofacial fractures in indigenous persons were less than in non-indigenous (31.2 versus 38.2 y, P < 0.001) with 3.8 odds of a facial fracture. Assault was 2.9 times more likely to result in a facial fracture, falls 40.9% less likely, and sports 29.4% less likely compared with non-indigenous ( P < 0.001). Alcohol-related facial fractures had significantly higher rates [odds ratio (OR = 3.8)] compared with non-indigenous. Indigenous from most disadvantaged areas and very remote areas also had significantly higher odds of a facial fracture. Indigenous persons had higher operative rates (OR = 2.8), postoperative complications (OR = 3.1), and a 3.7-day mean difference for the length of stay (6.6 versus 2.9 d, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Indigenous people are more likely to experience facial fractures from assault resulting in mandibular fractures, whereas non-indigenous people are likely to have sport or fall-related midface fractures. Young indigenous women from outer regional and very remote areas have greater odds of facial fractures caused by assault and alcohol with higher operative rates, postoperative complications, and extended length of stay.

Risk factors associated with short-term complications in mandibular fractures: the MANTRA study-a Maxillofacial Trainee Research Collaborative (MTReC).

INTRODUCTION: Complications following mandibular fractures occur in 9-23% of patients. Identifying those at risk is key to prevention. Previous studies highlighted smoking, age and time from injury to presentation as risk factors but rarely recorded other possible confounders. In this paper, we use a collaborative snapshot audit to document novel risk factors and confirm established risks for complications following the treatment of mandibular fractures. METHODS: The audit was carried out by 122 OMFS trainees across the UK and Ireland (49 centres) over 6 months, coordinated by the Maxillofacial Surgery Trainees Research Collaborative. Variables recorded included basic demography, medical and social history, injury mechanism and type, management and 30-day outcome. RESULTS: Nine hundred and forty-seven (947) patients with fractured mandibles were recorded. Surgical management was carried out in 76.3%. Complications at 30 days occurred 65 (9%) of those who were managed surgically. Risk factors for complications included male sex, increasing age, any medical history, increasing number of cigarettes smoked per week, increasing alcohol use per week, worse oral hygiene and increased time from injury to presentation. DISCUSSION: We have used a large prospective snapshot audit to confirm established risk factors and identify novel risk factors. We demonstrate that time from injury to presentation is confounded by other indicators of poor health behaviour. These results are important in designing trial protocols for management of mandibular fractures and in targeting health interventions to patients at highest risk of complications.

Isolated favorable compound mandibular body fractures: A retrospective review of two cohorts of patients based on the timing of treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Treatment delays in the management of mandible fractures are often unavoidable and, as a result, the timing of treatment of mandibular fractures has remained a contentious issue in clinical practice as the optimal treatment delay for minimizing complications remains unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the rate and types of complications between two cohorts of patients designated as early and late treatment groups and estimate an optimal time threshold for treatment delay after closed reduction and maxillomandibular fixation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Demographic and clinical data were collected retrospectively about patients who were treated for isolated, unilateral, favorable, and compound mandibular body fractures between 1999 and 2019 to answer the question of whether treatment delay is an independent variable impacting post-operative mandible body fracture complications. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy subjects were evaluated (n = 87 in the control/early group and n = 83 in the study/late group). The mean time lapses from injury to treatment were: early (5.8 ± 0.4 days) and late (10.3 ± 0.7 days). The overall complication rate was 14.1%. However, the complication rates of the early and late groups were 13.8% and 14.5%, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference between early and late treatment groups. Treatment delay was not an independent variable impacting post-operative mandible body fracture complications if treatment is done between 3 and 12 days after the injury.

Pattern and management of maxillofacial fractures in Jordanian children and adolescents.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze the characteristics, etiology and treatment of maxillofacial fractures among children and adolescents in northern part of Jordan. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study which included 91 children and adolescents patients who were treated for maxillofacial fractures during a period of three years between January 2019 and December 2021 at a tertiary hospital in Jordan. RESULTS: Over a period of three years, a total of 91 children between the age of 0 and 19 years were treated with 156 total maxillofacial fractures. Of these, 68 (74.73%) were males and 23 (25.27%) were females. One tenth of patients (10 (10.99%) were children of the preschool group and 55 patients (60.44%) were adolescents. Road traffic accident (RTA) was the most common cause of maxillofacial fractures, accounting for 57 (62.64%) of cases. Mandibular fractures were the most common and accounted for 82 (90.2%) of all fractures, followed by the zygomatic bone fractures 40 (44%). The most common treatment was intermaxillary fixation (IMF) with 53 (33.97%) fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Maxillofacial fractures are predominant among adolescents in comparison to children. RTA was the most common cause of maxillofacial fractures, mandibular fractures were the most common fractures, and intermaxillary fixation (IMF) was the most common treatment modality.

The Unfavourable Split: a novel classification and an 11-year retrospective study looking at alternative methods for management of this well-known complication.

An unfavourable split is a well-known complication following a sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) of the mandible. Our aim was to analyse all unfavourable mandibular splits that had occurred when carrying out a SSO with the aim to design a classification which can facilitate management. We carried out a retrospective study analysing all orthognathic surgery from January 2010 until April 2021. Data surrounding unfavourable splits during this period were specifically analysed. Orthognathic surgery during this period was performed by a single OMFS unit with osteotomies performed by a single surgeon and their trainee. The dataset included 311 patients who underwent either a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) or a bimaxillary osteotomy. There were 225 bimaxillary osteotomies and 86 BSSOs. Twenty-one patients had unfavourable splits following their BSSO with a total of 22 out of 622 sagittal split osteotomies over this 11-year period. Bilateral unfavourable splits occurred in one patient. These results correlate to an incidence rate of 6.8% of unfavourable splits following SSO's in an 11-year period. The results reveal common patterns of unfavourable splits to suggest a simple classification based on our results. This can be applied to any unfavourable splits in SSO which then allows the clinician to proceed with surgery and prevent abandonment of the procedure. It is classified as follows: Type 1 fractures where the mandibular condyle is attached to the proximal fragment; Type 2 fractures whereby the mandibular condyle is attached to the tooth-bearing segment; Type 3 fractures are lingual cortex fractures. Each of these fracture types has a specific management protocol, which we recommend is used in all unfavourable splits.