Factors that Promote and Protect Against Financial Toxicity after Orthopaedic Trauma: A Qualitative Study.

INTRODUCTION: Financial toxicity is highly prevalent in patients after an orthopaedic injury. However, little is known regarding the conditions that promote and protect against this financial distress. Our objective was to understand the factors that cause and protect against financial toxicity after a lower extremity fracture. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 20 patients 3 months after surgical treatment of a lower extremity fracture. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis to identify themes and subthemes. Data saturation occurred after 15 interviews. The percentage of patients who described the identified themes are reported. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients (median age, 44 years [IQR, 38 to 58]; 60% male) participated in the study. The most common injury was a distal tibia fracture (n = 8; 40%). Eleven themes that promoted financial distress were identified, the most common being work effects (n = 14; 70%) and emotional health (n = 12; 60%). Over half (n = 11; 55%) of participants described financial toxicity arising from an inability to access social welfare programs. Seven themes that protected against financial distress were also identified, including insurance (n = 17; 85%) and support from friends and family (n = 17; 85%). Over half (n = 13; 65%) of the participants discussed the support they received from their healthcare team, which encompassed expectation setting and connections to financial aid and other services. Employment protection and workplace flexibility were additional protective themes. CONCLUSION: This qualitative study of orthopaedic trauma patients found work and emotional health-related factors to be primary drivers of financial toxicity after injury. Insurance and support from friends and family were the most frequently reported protective factors. Many participants described the pivotal role of the healthcare team in establishing recovery expectations and facilitating access to social welfare programs.

What Is Important to Patients Who Are Recovering From an Open Tibial Fracture? A Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Open tibial fracture research has traditionally focused on surgical techniques; however, despite technological advances, outcomes from these injuries remain poor, with patients facing a sustained reduced quality of life. Research has rarely asked patients what is important to them after an open tibial fracture, and this question could potentially offer great insight into how to support patients. A qualitative study may assist in our understanding of this subject. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) What common themes did patients who have experienced open tibial fractures share? (2) What stresses and coping strategies did those patients articulate? (3) What sources for acquiring coping strategies did patients say they benefited from? METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with patients who had sustained an open tibial fracture between January 1, 2016 and January 1, 2019. All participants were recruited from a Level 1 trauma center in England, and 26 participants were included. The mean age was 44 ± 17 years, and 77% (20 of 26) were men. The patients' injuries ranged in severity, and they had a range of treatments and complications. Transcripts were analyzed using framework analysis, with codes subsequently organized into themes and subthemes. RESULTS: Four themes were identified, which included recouping physical mobility, values around treatment, fears about poor recovery, and coping strategies to reduce psychological burden. Coping strategies were important in mitigating the psychological burden of injury. Task-focused coping strategies were preferred by patients and perceived as taking a proactive approach to recovery. Healthcare practitioners, and others with lived experience were able to educate patients on coping, but such resources were scant and therefore probably less accessible to those with the greatest need. CONCLUSION: Most individuals fail to return to previous activities, and it is unlikely that improvements in surgical techniques will make major improvements in patient outcomes in the near future. Investment in psychosocial support could potentially improve patient experience and outcomes. Digital information platforms and group rehabilitation clinics were identified as potential avenues for development that could offer individuals better psychosocial support with minimal additional burden for surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Treatment of severely open tibial fractures, non-unions, and fracture-related infections with a gentamicin-coated tibial nail-clinical outcomes including quality of life analysis and psychological ICD-10-based symptom rating.

BACKGROUND: Implant-associated infections depict a major challenge in orthopedics and trauma surgery putting a high burden on the patients and health care systems, strongly requiring improvement of infection prevention and of clinical outcomes. One strategy includes the usage of antimicrobial-coated implants. We evaluated outcomes after surgical treatment using a gentamicin-coated nail on (i) treatment success in terms of bone consolidation, (ii) absence of infection, and (iii) patient-reported quality of life in a patient cohort with high risk of infection/reinfection and treatment failure. METHODS: Thirteen patients with open tibia fractures (n = 4), non-unions (n = 2), and fracture-related infection (n = 7) treated with a gentamicin-coated intramedullary nail (ETN ProtectTM) were retrospectively reviewed. Quality of life was evaluated with the EQ-5D, SF-36, and with an ICD-10-based symptom rating (ISR). RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 2.8 years, 11 of the 13 patients (84.6%) achieved bone consolidation without any additional surgical intervention, whereas two patients required a revision surgery due to infection and removal of the implant. No specific implant-related side effects were noted. Quality of life scores were significantly lower compared to a German age-matched reference population. The mean ISR scores revealed mild psychological symptom burden on the scale depression. CONCLUSION: The use of a gentamicin-coated intramedullary nail seems to be reasonable in open fractures and revision surgery for aseptic non-union or established fracture-related infection to avoid infection complications and to achieve bony union. Despite successful treatment of challenging cases with the gentamicin-treated implant, significantly reduced quality of life after treatment underlines the need of further efforts to improve surgical treatment strategies and psychological support.

The development of a novel patient-derived recovery scale for open tibial fractures.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to develop a psychometrically sound measure of recovery for use in patients who have suffered an open tibial fracture. METHODS: An initial pool of 109 items was generated from previous qualitative data relating to recovery following an open tibial fracture. These items were field tested in a cohort of patients recovering from an open tibial fracture. They were asked to comment on the content of the items and structure of the scale. Reduction in the number of items led to a refined scale tested in a larger cohort of patients. Principal components analysis permitted further reduction and the development of a definitive scale. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness were assessed for the retained items. RESULTS: The initial scale was completed by 35 patients who were recovering from an open tibial fracture. Subjective and objective analysis permitted removal of poorly performing items and the addition of items suggested by patients. The refined scale consisted of 50 Likert scaled items and eight additional items. It was completed on 228 occasions by a different cohort of 204 patients with an open tibial fracture recruited from several UK orthoplastic tertiary referral centres. There were eight underlying components with tangible real-life meaning, which were retained as sub-scales represented by ten Likert scaled and eight non-Likert items. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were good to excellent. CONCLUSION: The Wales Lower Limb Trauma Recovery (WaLLTR) Scale is the first tool to be developed from patient data with the potential to assess recovery following an open tibial fracture. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(1):17-25.

Quality of life and post-traumatic stress symptoms in paediatric patients with tibial fractures during treatment with cast or Ilizarov frame.

PURPOSE: To compare quality of life in children and adolescents with tibial fracture during treatment with either a definitive long-leg cast or Ilizarov frame. METHODS: A prospective, longitudinal cohort study was undertaken. Patients aged between 5 and 17 years with tibial fractures treated definitively using a long-leg cast or Ilizarov frame were recruited at first follow-up. Health related quality of life was measured at each clinic appointment during treatment using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) [1]; a validated measure of age-adjusted physical and psychosocial functioning. Psychological trauma symptoms were assessed using the Children's Revised Impact of Events Scale (CRIES) [2]. Results were analysed based on time from injury (less than 30 days, 30 to 120 days). Data regarding injury and treatment was recorded from the clinical records. Statistical analysis was undertaken using a Kruksal-Wallis test with a Tukey-Kramer subgroup analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients from each group were included in the final analysis. Injuries were more severe in the frame patients based on the AO/OTA classification and number of open fractures. No statistically significant differences were detected in any of the outcome scores between treatment groups at either time point. A significant improvement was found in the child reported physical and total domains in both treatment groups based on time from application (<30 days vs. >30 days, frame: p < 0.0001, cast: p = 0.003). There were no differences in the child reported psychosocial domain scores at any time point or between treatment groups. Parent reported scores only showed a significant physical improvement in the frame group (p < 0.0001). CRIES scores for psychological trauma in the intrusion and avoidance domain improved significantly in the cast group between time points (p < 0.05), Multivariate analysis identified polytrauma, mechanism of injury and time from injury but not treatment modality (cast or frame) as significant predictors of quality of life scores (PedsQL) and severity of post-traumatic symptoms (CRIES). CONCLUSION: We found no difference in health-related quality of life during treatment between our patients treated for tibial fractures using a cast or an Ilizarov frame.

Influence of reduction quality on functional outcome and quality of life in treatment of tibial plafond fractures: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of reduction quality, using intraoperative 3D imaging, on quality of life and functional outcome in the operative treatment of tibial plafond fractures. METHODS: A group of patients with tibial plafond fractures was re-examined. The operative treatment was performed between September 2001 and October 2011. The follow-up examination was at least 2 years after the final surgical procedure. Final reduction result was assessed intraoperatively using a mobile 3D C-arm. A categorization with regard to descriptive parameters as well as type and size of joint surface irregularities was performed. Follow-up results were evaluated using: Olerud and Molander (O & M) score, Short-Form-36 (SF-36) score, movement deficit, Kellgren and Lawrence grade of osteoarthritis, and pain intensity. RESULTS: 34 patients with operatively treated tibial plafond fracture could be re-examined. Reduction quality had the greatest influence on functional result measured by the O & M score (p = 0.001) and the PCS domain of the SF-36 score (p = 0.018). Significant differences with regard to O & M score (p = 0.000), SF-36 score (p = 0.001 to p = 0.02; without MCS domain), movement deficit (p = 0.001), grade of osteoarthritis (p = 0.005) and pain (p = 0.001) could be verified under consideration of the reduction quality. The group with the anatomically more accurate reduction also showed a better result for clinical follow-up and quality of life. Furthermore, it is not the type of joint surface irregularity that is always decisive, but rather the size. CONCLUSIONS: Despite other relevant factors, it appears that reduction quality -which can be analyzed with intraoperative 3D imaging- plays the most important role in postoperative quality of life and functional outcome. Corrections should therefore be performed on joint surface irregularities with a size above 2 mm.

Nociceptive and Cognitive Changes in a Murine Model of Polytrauma.

Polytrauma commonly involves concussion (mild traumatic brain injury [mTBI]) and peripheral trauma including limb fractures. Interactions between mTBI and peripheral injuries are poorly understood, both leading to chronic pain and neurobehavioral impairments. To elucidate these interactions, a murine polytrauma model was developed. mTBI alone resulted in similar increased mechanical allodynia in male and female mice. Female fracture and polytrauma groups displayed greater increases in hind paw tactile hypersensitivity for weeks after injury than did the respective male groups. Capsaicin-evoked spontaneous pain behaviors were greater in fracture and polytrauma female mice compared with male mice. The mTBI and polytrauma male mice displayed significant deficits in spatial working memory. All fracture, mTBI, or polytrauma groups had deficits in object recognition memory. Only male mTBI or polytrauma mice showed greater agitation and increased risk-taking behavior in open field testing as well as zero maze tests. Additionally, impaired diffuse noxious inhibitory control was observed in all mTBI and polytrauma mice. The model presented offers clinically relevant features useful for studying persistent pain as well as cognitive and other behavioral changes after TBI including polytrauma. A better understanding of nervous system dysfunction after TBI and polytrauma might help prevent or reduce persistent pain and disability in these patients. PERSPECTIVE: The polytrauma model presented has relevant features of chronic pain and neurobehavioral impairments useful for studying mechanisms involved in their development. This model may have special value in understanding altered descending pain modulation after TBI and polytrauma.

The psychological impact of external fixation using the Ilizarov or Orthofix LRS method to treat tibial osteomyelitis with a bone defect.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the psychological impact of external fixation for a tibial bone defect due to osteomyelitis, and to compare the Orthofix limb reconstruction system (LRS) with the Ilizarov external fixator. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The SCL-90-R questionnaire was administered at four different time points (before surgery, while patients wore the external fixation device, when the device was removed, and two to three months after). The scores at the four time points were compared, as were the two different methods of external fixation (Orthofix LRS vs. Ilizarov). RESULTS: The patients experienced a significant adverse impact on their mental health, with the worst outcomes at Time 2 (while wearing the external fixator), but with some negative effects still present even several months after removal of the fixation device. Although the Orthofix LRS and Ilizarov groups showed similar mental health scores at Time 1 (preoperatively) and Time 3 (upon removal of the fixation device), the Orthofix LRS was associated with better scores, specifically in the Hostility (Time 2), Phobic Anxiety (Time 2), Psychoticism (Times 2 and 4), and Other (Time 2) sub-scores, as well as the total score (Times 2 and 4). CONCLUSIONS: Although both Ilizarov and Orthofix LRS fixation resolved the bone defects, external fixation had a negative impact on the patients' mental health, which persisted even after removal of the devices. Although both methods led to negative effects on the patients' mental, the impact of the Orthofix LRS was less severe.

The treatment of segmental tibial fractures: does patient preference differ from surgeon choice?

INTRODUCTION: Segmental tibial fractures are complex injuries with a prolonged recovery time. Current definitive treatment options include intramedullary fixation or a circular external fixator. However, there is uncertainty as to which surgical option is preferable and there are no sufficiently rigorous multi-centre trials that have answered this question. The objective of this study was to determine whether patient and surgeon opinion was permissive for a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing intramedullary nailing to the application of a circular external fixator. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A convenience questionnaire survey of attending surgeons was conducted during the United Kingdom's Orthopaedic Trauma Society annual meeting 2017 to determine the treatment modalities used for a segmental tibial fracture (n=63). Patient opinion was obtained from clinical patients who had been treated for a segmental tibial fracture as part of a patient and public involvement focus group with questions covering the domains of surgical preference, treatment expectations, outcome, the consent process and follow-up regime (n=5). RESULTS: Based on the surgeon survey, 39% routinely use circular frame fixation following segmental tibial fracture compared to 61% who use nail fixation. Nail fixation was reported as the treatment of choice for a closed injury in a healthy patient in 81% of surgeons, and by 86% for a patient with a closed fracture who was obese. Twenty-one percent reported that they would use a nail for an open segmental tibia fracture in diabetics who smoked, whilst 57% would opt for a nail for a closed injury with compartment syndrome, and only 27% would use a nail for an open segmental injury in a young fit sports person. The patient and public preference exercise identified that sleep, early functional outcomes and psychosocial measures of outcomes are important. CONCLUSION: We concluded that a RCT comparing definitive fixation with an intramedullary nail and a circular external fixator is justified as there remains uncertainty on the optimal surgical management for segmental tibial fractures. Furthermore, psychosocial factors and early post-operative outcomes should be reported as core outcome measures as part of such a trial.

Quality of life and prognostic factors after intra-articular tibial pilon fracture.

BACKGROUND: Intra-articular tibial plafond fractures are a challenge for the surgeon with generally poor functional outcomes. The purpose was to assess the impact of this injury on patient quality of life (QOL), as well as analyzed the predictor factors. METHODS: Retrospective study of 47 patients with mean age of 44.4 (range 18-79) years. Patients were also invited for new clinical and radiological assessments. QOL was evaluated by the Short Form-36 questionnaire and compared to the standard in the age-matched general population. Olerud-Molander ankle score (OMAS) was used to assess function. Digital radiographs were evaluated for linear and angular measurements. RESULTS: The mean follow-up at last visit was 5.3 (range, 2-10) years. Sequelae were present in 20 patients, mainly including chronic pain (8) and arthrosis (10). Articular step-off at least 2mm was present in 20 patients had, articular gap greater than 2mm in 13, and malalignment in 5. Worse reduction was obtained with external fixation. QOL was significant lower than age-matched general population (p=0.000). Main prognostic factors of worse SF36 were fracture severity, reduction quality and arthrosis. A strong significant relationship was found between SF36-physical and OMAS scores (p=0.000). CONCLUSION: Intra-articular tibial plafond fracture had a dramatic impact on QOL. Among the predictors of unsuccessful outcome, the reduction quality was the only modifiable factor by the surgeon. The OMAS had a predictive value on the prognosis of QOL.

Patient reported health related quality of life early outcomes at 12 months after surgically managed tibial plafond fracture.

INTRODUCTION: Tibial plafond fractures represent a small but complex subset of fractures of the lower limb. The aim of this study was to describe the health related quality of life, pain and return to work outcomes 12 months following surgically managed tibial plafond fracture. METHODS: The Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Registry (VOTOR) database was used to identify patients with tibial plafond fractures. All patients captured by VOTOR with a tibial plafond fracture between September 2003 and July 2009, were identified consecutively and comprised the initial cohort. The radiographs of all identified patients were classified using the AO/OTA fracture classification. A review of the included patient's medical records was performed. Data were collected on the injury event, management and complications. Outcomes at 12 months were prospectively collected by telephone interview and included return to work, a numerical rating scale for assessment of pain and the Short Form 12 (SF-12). RESULTS: There were 98 unilateral tibial plafond fractures; 91 fractures were managed operatively, 4 non-operatively and 3 underwent amputation. The 91 operatively managed patients were the focus of this study. A two-stage management approach, involving temporary external fixation, followed by definitive open reduction and internal fixation, was the most common operative treatment. The follow-up rate at 12 months was 70%. 57% had returned to work by 12 months post-injury, the median (IQR) pain score was 2 (0-5) and 27% reported moderate to severe persistent pain. Mean PCS-12 scores were significantly lower than Australian norms (p=0.99), 38.2 for males and 37.5 for females. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of persistent pain, loss of physical health and a low return to work rate highlights the profound impact of tibial plafond fractures on patients' lives. Although this study looked at the early 12 month results, it is expected these outcomes will continue to improve over time. Further studies, with larger patient numbers, must focus on how to improve not only the operative management of these fractures, but also patient's mental and overall physical health in the long term. Improved management techniques and early identification of injury patterns known to perform poorly may help long-term outcomes.

Smoking cessation advice in limb reconstruction: An opportunity not to be missed.

The adverse health effects of smoking are well known, including its effects on the musculoskeletal system. Limb reconstruction using external fixators is a high intensity process with high levels of patient contact time, complications and cost. The aim of this study was to examine smoking patterns in this group and in particular to assess trends in smoking cession. Data was collected from 41 patients all undergoing treatment using circular frame external fixation, for a variety of pathologies, most commonly acute tibial trauma. A patient reported questionnaire was used. Data was collected over a six-month period. In our population 56.1% of patients were smokers. During the study 47.8% patients stopped smoking and a further 39.1% decreased their smoking behaviour. 78.3% of patients could recall being given smoking cessation advice. In our group, 87% of patients were unaware of the effects of smoking on bone healing. Once made aware during discussion of proposed treatment, 73.9% stated that it was, in part, this knowledge that prompted them to positively change their smoking habits. The results of this study show that advice regarding smoking cessation during limb reconstruction treatment can potentially have a positive impact on patients smoking habits. The effect of smoking should be linked to the patient pathology and discussed during the consent process. Taking the time with the patient for this simple free intervention can have a positive impact on patient health, and potentially on the outcome of their current treatment, and is an opportunity not to be missed.

[Midterm Results for Quality of Life After Surgical Treatment of Moore Type V Fractures of the Tibial Plateau]. / Mittelfristige Ergebnisse zur Lebensqualität nach operativer Versorgung von Tibiakopffrakturen vom Typ Moore V.

Background: Dislocation fractures of the tibial plateau often lead to functional restrictions and subjective complaints from the patients. Besides functional and radiological results, criteria to determine the quality of life are of increasing importance. Intermediate term restriction in quality of life was evaluated and correlated with objective radiological results in patients with Moore type V dislocation fracture of the tibial plateau. Patients and Methods: From 2003 to 2012, a multicentre retrospective cohort study in three hospitals was used to register 36 patients with 38 Moore type V dislocation fractures of the tibial plateau. The injury mechanism, the surgical treatment (one step or two step surgery, single or double plate fixation) the complication rate, the radiological result (Kellgren/Lawrence osteoarthritis score, loss of reduction, secondary deviation of the axis) after a mean follow-up of 37 months, and the quality of life (pain and function by NRS, IKDC form, EQ 5D score) after a mean follow-up of 68 months (range, 15-128 months), were analysed. Results: The mean age of the 27 men and the 9 women was 50.8 years. There were 30 cases of high impact injury. An external fixator was used for primary fracture stabilisation in 24 knees; definitive internal fixation was performed in a second step. Internal fixation using a single plate was used in 12 knees, and double plate fixation in 25 knees; one patient was treated definitively with an external fixator. Early complications (3â€Š× infection, 2â€Š× compartment syndrome, 4â€Š× implant failure) were seen in 21.1 % of patients; all could be cured surgically. The function of the affected knee joint gave a mean NRS of 4.53; the IKDC score was 50.46, and the EQ 5D 7.47. Only two patients (5 %) were free of pain, 27 (75 %) reported mild to moderate pain, and 7 patients (20 %) reported severe pain. Four patients are retired or have applied for a pension. Altogether, the quality of life was calculated as being 44 % of the initial value before the injury. Four patients required an endoprosthetic replacement at an early stage, after an average of 6 months. Signs of osteoarthritis (Kellgren/Lawrence > I) were seen in 32 of the remaining 33 fractures; 19 of these exhibited distinct signs of osteoarthritis (Kellgren/Lawrence III, IV). Loss of reduction (≥ 2 mm) was seen in 13 (34.2 %) and deviation of axis (> 10°) in 3 patients (7.8 %). There was no relation to the surgical strategy. However, there was a correlation between the subjective assessments of the quality of life and the radiological results. Conclusion: Moore type V dislocation fractures of the tibial plateau are severe knee injuries resulting in a distinct reduction in quality of life in the intermediate term. There is a correlation between the subjective assessments and the objective radiological results. Therefore, the congruency of the articular surface and the axis have to be reconstructed as precisely as possible when repairing fractures of the tibial plateau.

Does Participation in a Randomized Clinical Trial Change Outcomes? An Evaluation of Patients Not Enrolled in the SPRINT Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent to which knowledge from clinical trial protocols is transferred to nonparticipating patients. DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a large clinical trial. SETTING: Six level-1 international trauma centers. METHODS: We compared rates and timing of reoperation in a subset of patients enrolled in the Study to Prospectively evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Patients with Tibial Fractures (SPRINT) to concurrent patients who were eligible but not enrolled. This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected trial data. The records of 6 of the original SPRINT centers were searched for non-SPRINT patients who underwent intramedullary nailing of a closed tibial fracture. The rate and timing of reoperation were compared. A P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: One hundred fourteen non-SPRINT patients were compared with 328 patients enrolled in SPRINT from those same sites. There were 7 reoperations (6.1%) in non-SPRINT patients versus 18 (5.2%) in SPRINT patients [odds ratio (OR) 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41 to 3.13; P = 0.811]. There was no difference in the time to reoperation between the SPRINT and non-SPRINT patients (6.2 vs. 6.8 months, 95% CI of the difference -3.8 to 2.6; P = 0.685) or in the proportion of patients who underwent reoperation before 6 months (29% vs. 43%; OR 1.75; 95% CI 0.18 to 15.41; P = 0.647). CONCLUSIONS: Patients not enrolled in SPRINT had similarly low rates of reoperation for nonunion, and the average time to reoperation for both groups was longer than 6 months. A 6-month waiting period may have allowed slow-to-heal fractures adequate time to heal, thereby reducing the rate of diagnosis of nonunion. As such, this waiting period could contribute to lower-than-expected reoperation rates for nonunion. It is possible that clinical trials may beneficially influence the care of nonenrolled patients.

Shared Decision Making, Fast and Slow: Implications for Informed Consent, Resource Utilization, and Patient Satisfaction in Orthopaedic Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Through shared decision making, the physician and patient exchange information to arrive at an agreement about the patient's preferred treatment. This process is predicated on the assumption that there is a single preferred treatment, and the goal of the dialog is to discover it. In contrast, psychology theory (ie, prospect theory) suggests that people can make decisions both analytically and intuitively through parallel decision-making processes, and depending on how the choice is framed, the two processes may not agree. Thus, patients may not have a single preferred treatment, but rather separate intuitive and analytic preferences. The research question addressed here is whether subjects might reveal different therapeutic preferences based on how a decision is framed. METHODS: Five clinical scenarios on the management of tibial plateau fractures were constructed. Healthy volunteers were asked to select among treatments offered. Four weeks later, the scenarios were presented again; the facts of the scenario were unchanged, but the description was altered to test the null hypothesis that minor changes in wording would not lead the subjects to change their decision about treatment. For example, incomplete improvement after surgery was described first as a gain from the preoperative state and then as a loss from the preinjury state. RESULTS: In all five cases, the variation predicted by psychology theory was detected. Respondents were affected by whether choices were framed as avoided losses versus potential gains; by emotional cues; by choices reported by others (ie, bandwagon effect); by the answers proposed to them in the question (ie, anchors); and by seemingly irrelevant options (ie, decoys). DISCUSSION: The influence of presentation on preferences can be highly significant in orthopaedic surgery. The presence of parallel decision-making processes implies that the standard methods of obtaining informed consent may require further refinement. Furthermore, if the way that information is portrayed makes surgery more or less appealing, the use of services may be subject to unwanted influence. If surgery were accepted preoperatively by the patient's intuitive process but evaluated after the fact by the analytic process (or vice versa), well-indicated and well-performed surgery may still fail to provide patient satisfaction.

Functional outcome and general health status after treatment of AO type 43 distal tibial fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Distal tibial fractures are uncommon, but they result in poor overall outcome. The objective of this study was to assess functional outcome and general health status after the treatment of distal tibial fractures and identify factors that affect these outcome measures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study including 118 AO type 43 distal tibial fractures in 116 patients was conducted. With regard to articular involvement, fractures were classified as either simple (A1-B2, n=70) or complex (B3-C3, n=48). Twenty relevant demographic and operative variables were studied. Functional outcome, quality of life and pain were assessed using the Foot Function Index (FFI) and AOFAS ankle score, physical and mental SF-36, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) questionnaires, respectively. RESULTS: Over 75% of patients experienced noteworthy loss of ankle function. The general health status assessment showed markedly affected quality of life with more than two-third of all responding patients suffering from pain every day. In fact, complex fractures and increased complication rate were associated with worse functional outcome, whereas prolonged time to definite surgery affected both functional outcome and general health status significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Complex distal tibial fractures were associated with poor functional outcome scores and delayed (-staged) surgery has been shown to prevent postoperative soft tissue problems. However, soft tissue injury associated with distal tibial fractures itself affected both the postoperative functional outcome and general health status as well. This should contribute to the understanding of treatment and outcome of distal tibial fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Reaming Does Not Affect Functional Outcomes After Open and Closed Tibial Shaft Fractures: The Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the effect of reaming on 1-year 36-item short-form general health survey (SF-36) and short musculoskeletal function assessment (SMFA) scores from the Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in patients with Tibial Fractures. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial.1319 patients were randomized to reamed or unreamed nails. Fractures were categorized as open or closed. SETTING: Twenty-nine academic and community health centers across the US, Canada, and the Netherlands. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One thousand three hundred and nineteen skeletally mature patients with closed and open diaphyseal tibia fractures. INTERVENTION: Reamed versus unreamed tibial nails. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: SF-36 and the SMFA. Outcomes were obtained during the initial hospitalization to reflect preinjury status, and again at the 2-week, 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year follow-up. Repeated measures analyses were performed with P < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: There were no differences between the reamed and unreamed groups at 12 months for either the SF-36 physical component score [42.9 vs. 43.4, P = 0.54, 95% Confidence Interval for the difference (CI) -2.1 to 1.1] or the SMFA dysfunction index (18.0 vs. 17.6, P = 0.79. 95% CI, -2.2 to 2.9). At one year, functional outcomes were significantly below baseline for the SF-36 physical componentf score, SMFA dysfunction index, and SMFA bothersome index (P < 0.001). Time and fracture type were significantly associated with functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Reaming does not affect functional outcomes after intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures. Patients with open fractures have worse functional outcomes than those with a closed injury. Patients do not reach their baseline function by 1 year after surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[Quality of life and job performance resulting from operatively treated tibial plateau fractures]. / Lebensqualität und Arbeitsfähigkeit nach operativer Behandlung von Tibiakopffrakturen.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this article is to present the functional results and the effect on quality of life of surgically treated tibial plateau fractures in physically active and working patients with multiple and serious injuries. In addition, the relationships between functional and radiological outcome were evaluated and compared with activity in daily and professional life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 41 injured patients were followed up a mean of 47 months after surgical treatment and examined with radiological, functional, as well as quality of life score. RESULTS: In the radiological scoring, a mean value of 72 points (max 100 points) was achieved. In the activity score, there was an average of 63.5 points (max 100 points). When evaluating the health-related quality of life, an average score of 69.6 points was achieved. There was a significant relationship between radiological and activity scores and the radiological and life quality scores. Furthermore, the relationship between activity and quality of life scores was considered significant. Surgeon's influence on the functional outcome could be confirmed. CONCLUSION: The functional and the radiological results were moderate. Quality of life was permanently affected by the consequences of tibial plateau fracture in 12 patients; 11 patients were not re-employed. However, the quality of life was assessed as good or very good and 28 patients had returned to work. The quality of life was firmly linked to the radiological and functional parameters, which tended to be influenced by the quality of the primary surgical treatment when looking at the overall population.

The outcome after lateral tibial plateau fracture treated with percutaneus screw fixation show a tendency towards worse functional outcome compared with a reference population.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the functional and radiological outcome after lateral tibial plateau fractures (Müller AO classification (AO) 41-B1, B2 and B3) treated with minimal invasive bone tamp reduction and percutaneous screw fixation. METHODS: Retrospective, cross-sectional study. Review and clinical examination of 37 patients treated between 2005 and 2010. The patients completed a clinical examination, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and questionnaire evaluating QOL (Eq5D-5L). RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients agreed to participate (76 %). Mean time of follow-up was 5.2 years. At final follow-up, maintained anatomical joint reduction was achieved in 34 patients. The mean KOOS score was pain = 84.4, ADL = 88.4, symptoms = 80.7, QOL = 70.3, sport = 59.6. Compared with the established KOOS reference population patients, the current study reports a tendency towards worse KOOS scores but is only significant for KOOS sport. The mean Eq5D-5L index was 0.815 and shows a tendency towards worse outcome compared with the reference population. Mean knee flexion: 125.7° (95-135). A reduced number of sit-to-stands in the mean 30-s chair stand test showed a significant negative association with KOOS. The study showed a significant association between younger age at surgery and worse KOOS outcome. CONCLUSION: At 5.2-year follow-up, the patients reported a tendency towards worse KOOS and Eq5D-5L scores compared with established reference populations. This study shows a significant association between a decrease in muscle strength and worse KOOS outcome. Furthermore, a significant association between younger age at the time of surgery and worse KOOS outcome score was observed.

QUALITY OF LIFE FOLLOWING SURGICAL TREATMENT OF LOWER LIMB METASTASES IN LONG BONE.

Pathological fractures have a high incidence in musculo-skeletal oncology, and localization in long bone causes severe pain, disability and poor quality of life. The aim of this retrospective case series is to evaluate the clinical results, in particular regarding the quality of life, in patients affected by lower long bone pathological fractures surgically treated. We analyzed 93 patients with pathological fractures of tibia and femur surgically treated in our Orthopaedic Department and followed up for at least 3 years or until their death. Intramedullary nailing or endoprosthetic reconstruction for pathologic fractures located in the metadiaphyseal and diaphyseal or proximal regions in advanced-stage cancer patients are suitable methods for a stable fixation or reconstruction. These approaches guarantee a good mechanical stability, a faster mobilization, a better control of pain with an overall improvement in quality of life in all patients, confirmed also by the trend of the ECOG performance status and QOL-ACD.