Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 3.271
Filtrar
2.
Eur J Pharmacol ; 976: 176674, 2024 Aug 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38810715

RESUMEN

Antipsychotic drugs often lead to adverse effects, including those related to the cardiovascular system. Of these, quetiapine is known to cause significant changes in the QT interval although the underlying mechanism remains mysterious, prompting us to examine its effects on cardiac electrophysiological properties. Therefore, we investigated the effect of quetiapine on contraction, action potential (AP), and the associated membrane currents such as L-type Ca2+ and K+ using the whole-cell patch clamp method to examine its impacts on isolated rat ventricular myocytes. Our results showed that (1) quetiapine reduces cell contractility in a concentration-dependent manner and (2) leads to a significant prolongation in the duration of AP in isolated ventricular myocytes. This effect was both concentration and frequency-dependent; (3) quetiapine significantly decreased the Ca2+, transient outward K+, and steady-state K+ currents. However, only high concentration of quetiapine (100 µM) could significantly change the activation and reactivation kinetics of L-type Ca2+ channels. This study demonstrates that QT extension induced by quetiapine is mainly associated with the prolongation of AP. Moreover, quetiapine caused a significant decrease in contractile force and excitability of ventricular myocytes by suppressing Ca2+ and K+ currents.


Asunto(s)
Potenciales de Acción , Canales de Calcio Tipo L , Ventrículos Cardíacos , Contracción Miocárdica , Miocitos Cardíacos , Fumarato de Quetiapina , Animales , Fumarato de Quetiapina/farmacología , Miocitos Cardíacos/efectos de los fármacos , Miocitos Cardíacos/metabolismo , Ventrículos Cardíacos/efectos de los fármacos , Ventrículos Cardíacos/citología , Ratas , Potenciales de Acción/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Canales de Calcio Tipo L/metabolismo , Canales de Calcio Tipo L/efectos de los fármacos , Contracción Miocárdica/efectos de los fármacos , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Antipsicóticos/farmacología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Calcio/metabolismo
3.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci ; 33: e31, 2024 May 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38779809

RESUMEN

AIMS: Accumulating studies have assessed mortality risk associated with mood-stabilizers, the mainstay treatment for bipolar disorder (BD). However, existing data were mostly restricted to suicide risk, focused on lithium and valproate and rarely adequately adjusted for potential confounders. This study aimed to assess comparative mortality risk with all, natural and unnatural causes between lithium, valproate and three frequently prescribed second-generation antipsychotics (SGA), with adjustment for important confounders. METHODS: This population-based cohort study identified 8137 patients with first-diagnosed BD, who had exposed to lithium (n = 1028), valproate (n = 3580), olanzapine (n = 797), quetiapine (n = 1975) or risperidone (n = 757) between 2002 and 2018. Data were retrieved from territory-wide medical-record database of public healthcare services in Hong Kong. Propensity-score (PS)-weighting method was applied to optimize control for potential confounders including pre-existing chronic physical diseases, substance/alcohol use disorders and other psychotropic medications. PS-weighted Cox proportional-hazards regression was conducted to assess risk of all-, natural- and unnatural-cause mortality related to each mood-stabilizer, compared to lithium. Three sets of sensitivity analyses were conducted by restricting to patients with (i) length of cumulative exposure to specified mood-stabilizer ≥90 days and its medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥90%, (ii) MPR of specified mood-stabilizer ≥80% and MPR of other studied mood-stabilizers <20% and (iii) monotherapy. RESULTS: Incidence rates of all-cause mortality per 1000 person-years were 5.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.5-7.6), 8.4 (7.4-9.5), 11.1 (8.3-14.9), 7.4 (6.0-9.2) and 12.0 (9.3-15.6) for lithium-, valproate-, olanzapine-, quetiapine- and risperidone-treated groups, respectively. BD patients treated with olanzapine (PS-weighted hazard ratio = 2.07 [95% CI: 1.33-3.22]) and risperidone (1.66 [1.08-2.55]) had significantly higher all-cause mortality rate than lithium-treated group. Olanzapine was associated with increased risk of natural-cause mortality (3.04 [1.54-6.00]) and risperidone was related to elevated risk of unnatural-cause mortality (3.33 [1.62-6.86]), relative to lithium. The association between olanzapine and increased natural-cause mortality rate was consistently affirmed in sensitivity analyses. Relationship between risperidone and elevated unnatural-cause mortality became non-significant in sensitivity analyses restricted to low MPR in other mood-stabilizers and monotherapy. Valproate- and lithium-treated groups did not show significant differences in all-, natural- or unnatural-cause mortality risk. CONCLUSION: Our data showed that olanzapine and risperidone were associated with higher mortality risk than lithium, and further supported the clinical guidelines recommending lithium as the first-line mood-stabilizer for BD. Future research is required to further clarify comparative mortality risk associated with individual SGA agents to facilitate risk-benefit evaluation of alternative mood-stabilizers to minimize avoidable premature mortality in BD.


Asunto(s)
Antimaníacos , Antipsicóticos , Trastorno Bipolar , Puntaje de Propensión , Fumarato de Quetiapina , Ácido Valproico , Humanos , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Bipolar/mortalidad , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéutico , Antimaníacos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Fumarato de Quetiapina/uso terapéutico , Fumarato de Quetiapina/efectos adversos , Olanzapina/uso terapéutico , Hong Kong/epidemiología , Risperidona/uso terapéutico , Risperidona/efectos adversos , Litio/uso terapéutico , Causas de Muerte
4.
Mol Biol Rep ; 51(1): 660, 2024 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750264

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cadmium (Cd) is a heavy metal with extremely harmful toxic effects on the brain. Quetiapine (QTP) has unique neuroprotective effects with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant actions. However, its neuroprotective effect against Cd-induced neurotoxicity has not been previously studied. METHODS: QTP was administered in 10 and 20 mg/kg doses, while Cd was given in a dose of 6.5 mg/kg. RESULTS: In our study, QTP dose-dependently attenuated neuronal injury by downregulating p-tau and ß-amyloid. QTP potently attenuates histological abrasions induced by Cd. QTP counteracted oxidative injury by decreasing neuronal MDA and increased GSH levels mediated by downregulating Keap1 and upregulating Nrf2 and HO-1. QTP mitigated inflammation by decreasing MPO and NO2 and neuronal cytokines TNF-α and IL-1ß and upregulating IL-10 levels mediated by NF-κB downregulation. Additionally, QTP counteracted Cd-induced pyroptosis by downregulating caspase-1, ASC, and NLRP3 protein levels. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, QTP mitigates neurotoxicity induced by Cd through suppression of inflammation, pyroptosis, and oxidative stress by controlling the NF-κB, Keap1/Nrf2, and pyroptosis signals.


Asunto(s)
Cadmio , Inflamación , Estrés Oxidativo , Piroptosis , Fumarato de Quetiapina , Estrés Oxidativo/efectos de los fármacos , Piroptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Cadmio/toxicidad , Fumarato de Quetiapina/farmacología , Inflamación/tratamiento farmacológico , Inflamación/metabolismo , Masculino , Ratones , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/farmacología , Factor 2 Relacionado con NF-E2/metabolismo , Neuronas/efectos de los fármacos , Neuronas/metabolismo , Neuronas/patología , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/metabolismo , Antioxidantes/farmacología , Antiinflamatorios/farmacología , FN-kappa B/metabolismo
5.
J Integr Neurosci ; 23(4): 80, 2024 Apr 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38682215

RESUMEN

Parkinson's disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms, including hallucinations. The use of antipsychotic medications is a common strategy to manage hallucinations associated with Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP). However, careful consideration is necessary when selecting the most appropriate drug due to the potential risks associated with the available treatment options. Atypical antipsychotics (AAPs), such as Pimavanserin and Clozapine, have effectively controlled PDP symptoms. On the contrary, the support for utilizing quetiapine is not as substantial as other antipsychotics because research studies specifically investigating its application are still emerging and relatively recent. The broad mechanisms of action of AAPs, involving dopamine and serotonin receptors, provide improved outcomes and fewer side effects than typical antipsychotics. Conversely, other antipsychotics, including risperidone, olanzapine, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, and lurasidone, have been found to worsen motor symptoms and are generally not recommended for PDP. While AAPs offer favorable benefits, they are associated with specific adverse effects. Extrapyramidal symptoms, somnolence, hypotension, constipation, and cognitive impairment are commonly observed with AAP use. Clozapine, in particular, carries a risk of agranulocytosis, necessitating close monitoring of blood counts. Pimavanserin, a selective serotonin inverse agonist, avoids receptor-related side effects but has been linked to corrected QT (QTc) interval prolongation, while quetiapine has been reported to be associated with an increased risk of mortality. This review aims to analyze the benefits, risks, and mechanisms of action of antipsychotic medications to assist clinicians in making informed decisions and enhance patient care.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Clozapina , Alucinaciones , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Piperidinas , Fumarato de Quetiapina , Humanos , Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Antipsicóticos/farmacología , Clozapina/efectos adversos , Clozapina/administración & dosificación , Clozapina/farmacología , Alucinaciones/tratamiento farmacológico , Alucinaciones/etiología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/farmacología , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Fumarato de Quetiapina/efectos adversos , Fumarato de Quetiapina/farmacología , Fumarato de Quetiapina/administración & dosificación , Urea/análogos & derivados , Urea/farmacología , Urea/efectos adversos
6.
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep ; 44(2): 424-436, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38686532

RESUMEN

AIM: This study aimed to verify the real-world efficacy and safety of quetiapine fumarate extended-release tablets (Bipresso® 50 mg and 150 mg; marketing authorization holder is KYOWA Pharmaceutical Industry Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) in patients with bipolar depression. METHODS: We performed a post-marketing surveillance with an observation period of 12 weeks. RESULTS: In the safety analysis group (n = 345), adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred in 111 patients (32.17%). The most common ADRs (>1%) were somnolence in 55 patients (15.94%), akathisia in 11 (3.19%), dizziness in 10 (2.90%), weight increase in 6 (1.74%), thirst in 5 (1.45%), and hypersomnia, constipation, and nausea in 4 patients each (1.16%). The only severe ADR was one patient of suicidal ideation, and "longer time since the onset of the first episode" (p = 0.011) and "presence of complications" (p < 0.001) were identified as significant risk factors for the occurrence of ADRs. In the efficacy analysis group (n = 265), the average changes from baseline in the total Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score were -7.3 ± 8.8, -12.2 ± 10.7, -16.8 ± 12.7, and -13.2 ± 12.7 points after 4, 8, and 12 weeks, and at the last evaluation, respectively. The mean MADRS total score decrease had no significant association with maximum daily dose, diagnosis, and presence or absence of prior or concomitant treatment for bipolar disorder with mood stabilizers/antipsychotics/antidepressants. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of quetiapine fumarate extended-release tablets was confirmed in clinical practice, and no new safety concerns or risks were identified.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Trastorno Bipolar , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Fumarato de Quetiapina , Humanos , Fumarato de Quetiapina/administración & dosificación , Fumarato de Quetiapina/efectos adversos , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Bipolar/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Comprimidos , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven , Japón/epidemiología
7.
J Child Neurol ; 39(5-6): 171-177, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38629166

RESUMEN

Delirium often goes unrecognized in neonates and children because of lack of experience in evaluating behavior and cognition, insufficient awareness of the prevalence, and nondistinctive symptoms in this population. Although there are increasing reports of the presence of delirium in neonates, there are little data to guide the pharmacologic treatment in this population. In this retrospective single-center case series, we present our experience using quetiapine to treat delirium in 9 medically complex neonates. Based on an extensive literature review, expert opinion, and institutional experience, we propose an approach for monitoring and treating delirium in neonates and infants.


Asunto(s)
Delirio , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Fumarato de Quetiapina , Humanos , Delirio/tratamiento farmacológico , Delirio/diagnóstico , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fumarato de Quetiapina/uso terapéutico , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Lactante
8.
In Vivo ; 38(3): 1079-1093, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38688627

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment, radiotherapy (RT) stands as a pivotal approach, yet the emergence of radioresistance poses a formidable challenge. This study aimed to explore the potential synergy between quetiapine and RT for HCC treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Hep3B xenograft mouse model was used, the investigation tracked tumor progression, safety parameters, and molecular mechanisms. RESULTS: The findings revealed a synergistic anti-HCC effect when quetiapine was coupled with RT that prolonged tumor growth time and a significantly higher growth inhibition rate compared to the control group. Safety assessments indicated minimal pathological changes, suggesting potential of quetiapine in mitigating RT-induced alterations in liver and kidney functions. Mechanistically, the combination suppressed metastasis and angiogenesis-related proteins, while triggering the activation of apoptosis-related proteins via targeting Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mediated signaling. CONCLUSION: The potential of the quetiapine and RT combination is emphasized, offering enhanced anti-HCC efficacy, a safety profile, and positioning quetiapine as a radiosensitizer for HCC treatment.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Fumarato de Quetiapina , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto , Animales , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/radioterapia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Ratones , Humanos , Fumarato de Quetiapina/farmacología , Fumarato de Quetiapina/uso terapéutico , Línea Celular Tumoral , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Proliferación Celular/efectos de la radiación , Masculino
10.
CNS Drugs ; 38(6): 473-480, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38635089

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Adequate antipsychotic treatment intensity is required before diagnosing resistant schizophrenia and initiating clozapine treatment. We aimed to investigate potential rapid drug metabolism underlying low dose-adjusted serum concentration (CD) of non-clozapine atypical antipsychotics preceding clozapine treatment. METHODS: Patients using non-clozapine, atypical antipsychotics (aripiprazole, risperidone, olanzapine, or quetiapine) within 1 year before starting clozapine were included in this study from a therapeutic drug monitoring service in Oslo, Norway, between 2005 and 2023. Patients were assigned into low CD (LCD) and normal CD (NCD) subgroups. Using a reference sample with 147,964 antipsychotic measurements, LCD was defined as CDs below the 25th percentile, while patients with NCD exhibited CDs between the 25th and 75th percentile of the respective reference measurements. Metabolic ratios, doses, and frequency of subtherapeutic levels of non-clozapine antipsychotics were compared between LCD and NCD groups. RESULTS: Preceding clozapine treatment, 110 out of 272 included patients (40.4%) were identified with LCD. Compared with the NCD group, LCD patients exhibited higher metabolic ratios of olanzapine (1.5-fold; p < 0.001), quetiapine (3.0-fold; p < 0.001), and risperidone (6.0-fold; p < 0.001). Metabolic ratio differences were independent of smoking and CYP2D6 genotype for olanzapine (p = 0.008) and risperidone (p = 0.016), respectively. Despite higher doses of olanzapine (1.25-fold; p = 0.054) and quetiapine (1.6-fold; p = 0.001) in LCD versus NCD patients, faster metabolism among the former was accompanied by higher frequencies of subtherapeutic levels of olanzapine (3.3-fold; p = 0.044) and quetiapine (1.8-fold; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: LCD and associated rapid metabolism of non-clozapine antipsychotics is frequent before starting clozapine treatment. For olanzapine and quetiapine, this is associated with significantly increased risk of having subtherapeutic concentrations.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Clozapina , Monitoreo de Drogas , Humanos , Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Clozapina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Noruega , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Esquizofrenia/sangre , Esquizofrenia Resistente al Tratamiento/tratamiento farmacológico , Fumarato de Quetiapina/administración & dosificación
11.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(4): e247604, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38662373

RESUMEN

Importance: Antipsychotics, such as quetiapine, are frequently prescribed to people with dementia to address behavioral symptoms but can also cause harm in this population. Objective: To determine whether warning letters to high prescribers of quetiapine can successfully reduce its use among patients with dementia and to investigate the impacts on patients' health outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of overprescribing letters that began in April 2015 and included the highest-volume primary care physician (PCP) prescribers of quetiapine in original Medicare. Outcomes of patients with dementia were analyzed in repeated 90-day cross-sections through December 2018. Analyses were conducted from September 2021 to February 2024. Interventions: PCPs were randomized to a placebo letter or 3 overprescribing warning letters stating that their prescribing of quetiapine was high and under review by Medicare. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome of this analysis was patients' total quetiapine use in days per 90-day period (the original trial primary outcome was total quetiapine prescribing by study PCPs). Prespecified secondary outcomes included measures of cognitive function and behavioral symptoms from nursing home assessments, indicators of depression from screening questionnaires in assessments and diagnoses in claims, metabolic diagnoses derived from assessments and claims, indicators of use of the hospital and other health care services, and death. Outcomes were analyzed separately for patients living in nursing homes and in the community. Results: Of the 5055 study PCPs, 2528 were randomized to the placebo letter, and 2527 were randomized to the 3 warning letters. A total of 84 881 patients with dementia living in nursing homes and 261 288 community-dwelling patients with dementia were attributed to these PCPs. There were 92 874 baseline patients (mean [SD] age, 81.5 [10.5] years; 64 242 female [69.2%]). The intervention reduced quetiapine use among both nursing home patients (adjusted difference, -0.7 days; 95% CI, -1.3 to -0.1 days; P = .02) and community-dwelling patients (adjusted difference, -1.5 days; 95% CI, -1.8 to -1.1 days; P < .001). There were no detected adverse effects on cognitive function (cognitive function scale adjusted difference, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.03; P = .19), behavioral symptoms (agitated or reactive behavior adjusted difference, -0.2%; 95% CI -1.2% to 0.8% percentage points; P = .72), depression, metabolic diagnoses, or more severe outcomes, including hospitalization and death. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that overprescribing warning letters to PCPs safely reduced quetiapine prescribing to their patients with dementia. This intervention and others like it may be useful for future efforts to promote guideline-concordant care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05172687.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Demencia , Prescripción Inadecuada , Fumarato de Quetiapina , Humanos , Demencia/tratamiento farmacológico , Demencia/psicología , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Fumarato de Quetiapina/uso terapéutico , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Medicare , Cognición/efectos de los fármacos
12.
Int J Biol Macromol ; 267(Pt 2): 131491, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599435

RESUMEN

Quetiapine hemifumarate (QF) delivery to the CNS via conventional formulations is challenging due to poor solubility and lower oral bioavailability (9 %). Similarly, many other second-generation antipsychotics, such as olanzapine, clozapine, and paliperidone, have also shown low oral bioavailability of <50 %. Hence, the present work was intended to formulate QF-loaded biodegradable PLGA-NPs with appropriate surface charge modification through poloxamer-chitosan and investigate its targeting potential on RPMI-2650 cell lines to overcome the limitations of conventional therapies. QF-loaded poloxamer-chitosan-PLGA in-situ gel (QF-PLGA-ISG) was designed using emulsification and solvent evaporation techniques. Developed QF-PLGA-ISG were subjected to evaluation for particle size, PDI, zeta potential, ex-vivo mucoadhesion, entrapment efficiency (%EE), and drug loading, which revealed 162.2 nm, 0.124, +20.5 mV, 52.4 g, 77.5 %, and 9.7 %, respectively. Additionally, QF-PLGA formulation showed >90 % release within 12 h compared to 80 % of QF-suspension, demonstrating that the surfactant with chitosan-poloxamer polymers could sustainably release medicine across the membrane. Ex-vivo hemolysis study proved that developed PLGA nanoparticles did not cause any hemolysis compared to negative control. Further, in-vitro cellular uptake and transepithelial permeation were assessed using the RPMI-2650 nasal epithelial cell line. QF-PLGA-ISG not only improved intracellular uptake but also demonstrated a 1.5-2-fold increase in QF transport across RPMI-2650 epithelial monolayer. Further studies in the EpiNasal™ 3D nasal tissue model confirmed the safety and efficacy of the developed QF-PLGA-ISG formulation with up to a 4-fold increase in transport compared to plain QF after 4 h. Additionally, histological reports demonstrated the safety of optimized formulation. Finally, favorable outcomes of IN QF-PLGA-ISG formulation could provide a novel platform for safe and effective delivery of QF in schizophrenic patients.


Asunto(s)
Administración Intranasal , Quitosano , Portadores de Fármacos , Nanopartículas , Copolímero de Ácido Poliláctico-Ácido Poliglicólico , Fumarato de Quetiapina , Quitosano/química , Copolímero de Ácido Poliláctico-Ácido Poliglicólico/química , Nanopartículas/química , Fumarato de Quetiapina/farmacocinética , Fumarato de Quetiapina/administración & dosificación , Fumarato de Quetiapina/química , Fumarato de Quetiapina/farmacología , Humanos , Portadores de Fármacos/química , Liberación de Fármacos , Tamaño de la Partícula , Animales , Línea Celular , Mucosa Nasal/metabolismo , Mucosa Nasal/efectos de los fármacos
13.
J Affect Disord ; 355: 528-539, 2024 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38518857

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Quetiapine monotherapy is recommended as the first-line option for acute mania and acute bipolar depression. However, the mechanism of action of quetiapine is unclear. Network pharmacology and molecular docking were employed to determine the molecular mechanisms of quetiapine bidirectional regulation of bipolar depression and mania. METHODS: Putative target genes for quetiapine were collected from the GeneCard, SwissTargetPrediction, and DrugBank databases. Targets for bipolar depression and bipolar mania were identified from the DisGeNET and GeneCards databases. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was generated using the String database and imported into Cytoscape. DAVID and the Bioinformatics platform were employed to perform the Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses of the top 15 core targets. The drug-pathway-target-disease network was constructed using Cytoscape. Finally, molecular docking was performed to evaluate the interactions between quetiapine and potential targets. RESULTS: Targets for quetiapine actions against bipolar depression (126 targets) and bipolar mania (81 targets) were identified. Based on PPI and KEGG pathway analyses, quetiapine may affect bipolar depression by targeting the MAPK and PI3K/AKT insulin signaling pathways via BDNF, INS, EGFR, IGF1, and NGF, and it may affect bipolar mania by targeting the neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction signaling pathway via HTR1A, HTR1B, HTR2A, DRD2, and GRIN2B. Molecular docking revealed good binding affinity between quetiapine and potential targets. LIMITATIONS: Pharmacological experiments should be conducted to verify and further explore these results. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that quetiapine affects bipolar depression and bipolar mania through distinct biological core targets, and thus through different mechanisms. Furthermore, our results provide a theoretical basis for the clinical use of quetiapine and possible directions for new drug development.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos , Humanos , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Manía , Fumarato de Quetiapina/farmacología , Fumarato de Quetiapina/uso terapéutico , Simulación del Acoplamiento Molecular , Farmacología en Red , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasas , Biología Computacional
15.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(11): e37612, 2024 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38489675

RESUMEN

Lipid emulsion has been shown to effectively relieve refractory cardiovascular collapse resulting from toxic levels of nonlocal anesthetics. The goal of this study was to examine the effect of lipid emulsions on neuropsychiatric drug-induced toxicity using relevant case reports of human patients, with a particular focus on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score and corrected QT interval, to analyze drugs that frequently require lipid emulsion treatment. The following keywords were used to retrieve relevant case reports from PubMed: "antidepressant or antipsychotic drug or amitriptyline or bupropion or citalopram or desipramine or dosulepin or dothiepin or doxepin or escitalopram or fluoxetine or haloperidol or olanzapine or phenothiazine or quetiapine or risperidone or trazodone" and "lipid emulsion or Intralipid." Lipid emulsion treatment reversed the corrected QT interval prolongation and decreases in Glasgow Coma Scale scores caused by toxic doses of neuropsychiatric drugs, especially lipid-soluble drugs such as amitriptyline, trazodone, quetiapine, lamotrigine, and citalopram. The log P (octanol/water partition coefficient) of the group which required more than 3 lipid emulsion treatments was higher than that that of the group which required less than 3 lipid emulsion treatments. The main rationale to administer lipid emulsion as an adjuvant was as follows: hemodynamic depression intractable to supportive treatment (88.3%) > lipophilic drugs (8.3%) > suspected overdose or no spontaneous breathing (1.6%). Adjuvant lipid emulsion treatment contributed to the recovery of 98.30% of patients with neuropsychiatric drug-induced toxicity. However, further analyses using many case reports are needed to clarify the effects of lipid emulsion resuscitation.


Asunto(s)
Dotiepina , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Trazodona , Humanos , Fumarato de Quetiapina , Amitriptilina , Citalopram , Emulsiones Grasas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico
16.
Eur Psychiatry ; 67(1): e29, 2024 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38487836

RESUMEN

We employed a Bayesian network meta-analysis for comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) for the treatment of bipolar patients with depressive episodes. Sixteen randomized controlled trials with 7234 patients treated by one of the five AAPs (cariprazine, lumateperone, lurasidone, olanzapine, and quetiapine) were included. For the response rate (defined as an improvement of ≥50% from baseline on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS]), all AAPs were more efficacious than placebo. For the remission rate (defined as the endpoint of MADRS ≤12 or ≤ 10), cariprazine, lurasidone, olanzapine, and quetiapine had higher remission rates than placebo. In terms of tolerability, olanzapine was unexpectedly associated with lower odds of all-cause discontinuation in comparison with placebo, whereas quetiapine was associated with higher odds of discontinuation due to adverse events than placebo. Compared with placebo, lumateperone, olanzapine, and quetiapine showed higher odds of somnolence. Lumateperone had a lower rate of ≥ weight gain of 7% than placebo and other treatments. Olanzapine was associated with a significant increase from baseline in total cholesterol and triglycerides than placebo. These findings inform individualized prescriptions of AAPs for treating bipolar depression in clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Trastorno Bipolar , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Fumarato de Quetiapina/efectos adversos , Olanzapina/efectos adversos , Clorhidrato de Lurasidona/efectos adversos , Metaanálisis en Red , United States Food and Drug Administration , Teorema de Bayes , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Brain Res Bull ; 210: 110927, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38485004

RESUMEN

Schizophrenia patients have abnormalities in white matter (WM) integrity in brain regions. S100B has been shown to be a marker protein for glial cells. The atypical antipsychotics have neuroprotective effects on the brain. It is not clear whether antipsychotics can induce S100B changes and improve symptoms by protecting oligodendrocytes. To investigate WM and S100B changes and associations and determine the effect of quetiapine on WM and S100B in schizophrenia patients, we determined serum S100B levels with solid phase immunochromatography and fractional anisotropy(FA)values of 36 patients and 40 healthy controls. Patients exhibited significantly higher serum concentrations of S100B and decreased FA values in left postcentral,right superior frontal,right thalamus, and left inferior occipital gyrus, while higher in right temporal cortex WM compared with healthy controls. Following treatment with quetiapine, patients had decreased S100B and higher FA values in right cerebellum,right superior frontal,right thalamus, and left parietal cortex,and decreased FA values in right temporal cortex WM compared with pre-treatment values. Furthermore, S100B were negatively correlated with PANSS positive scores and positively correlated with FA values in the left postcentral cortex. In addition,the percentage change in FA values in the right temporal cortex was positively correlated with the percentage change in the S100B, percentage reduction in PANSS scores, and percentage reduction in PANSS-positive scores. Our findings demonstrated abnormalities in S100B and WM microstructure in patients with schizophrenia. These abnormalities may be partly reversed by quetiapine treatment.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Esquizofrenia , Sustancia Blanca , Humanos , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico por imagen , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Sustancia Blanca/diagnóstico por imagen , Fumarato de Quetiapina/uso terapéutico , Imagen de Difusión Tensora/métodos , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Antipsicóticos/farmacología , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Subunidad beta de la Proteína de Unión al Calcio S100
18.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 87: 124-133, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38412585

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This network meta-analysis assessed the efficacy, tolerability, and acceptability of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) for Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials investigating SGAs for PDP up to October 26, 2023. RESULTS: We included 16 trials (N = 1252) investigating clozapine, melperone, olanzapine, pimavanserin, quetiapine, ulotaront, and placebo. In comparisons between SGAs and placebo, the findings were: i) Standardized mean differences, 95% confidence intervals (SMDs, 95%CIs), for psychotic-symptom reduction revealed the first rank of clozapine (-1.31, -1.73 to -0.89), the second rank of pimavanserin, with significant inferiority of quetiapine (SMD = 0.47, 0.02 to 0.92); ii) Mean differences (MDs, 95%CIs) for abnormal movement, as assessed by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale - Part III, indicated that clozapine had the least motor side effects (-0.92, -2.75 to 0.91); iii) Risk ratios (RRs, 95% CIs) for adverse-effect dropout rates were lowest for melperone (1.02, 0.20 to 5.24); and iv) RRs (95% CIs) for all-cause dropout rates were lowest for clozapine (0.73, 0.42 to 1.25). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with PDP, clozapine may substantially reduce psychotic symptoms with minimal abnormal movement, high acceptability, and moderate overall tolerability. Pimavanserin, not quetiapine, could be an alternative.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Clozapina , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Trastornos Psicóticos , Humanos , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Butirofenonas , Clozapina/uso terapéutico , Discinesias/complicaciones , Discinesias/tratamiento farmacológico , Metaanálisis en Red , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperidinas , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Psicóticos/etiología , Fumarato de Quetiapina/uso terapéutico , Urea/análogos & derivados
19.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 149(4): 295-312, 2024 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38382649

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although not approved for the treatment of anxiety disorders (except trifluoperazine) there is ongoing off-label, unapproved use of first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) and second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) for anxiety disorders. There have been systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the use of antipsychotics in anxiety disorders, most of which focused on SGAs. OBJECTIVE: The specific aims of this umbrella review are to: (1) Evaluate the evidence of efficacy of FGAs and SGAs in anxiety disorders as an adjunctive treatment to traditional antidepressant treatments and other nonantipsychotic medications; (2) Compare monotherapy with antipsychotics to first-line treatments for anxiety disorders in terms of effectiveness, risks, and side effects. The review protocol is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021237436). METHODS: An initial search was undertaken to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses from inception until 2020, with an updated search completed August 2021 and January 2023. The searches were conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), APA PsycInfo (Ovid), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost), and the Cochrane Library through hand searches of references of included articles. Review quality was measured using the AMSTAR-2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) scale. RESULTS: The original and updated searches yielded 1796 and 3744 articles respectively, of which 45 were eligible. After final review, 25 systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included in the analysis. Most of the systematic reviews and meta-analyses were deemed low-quality through AMSTAR-2 with only one review being deemed high-quality. In evaluating the monotherapies with antipsychotics compared with first-line treatments for anxiety disorder there was insufficient evidence due to flawed study designs (such as problems with randomization) and small sample sizes within studies. There was limited evidence suggesting efficacy of antipsychotic agents in anxiety disorders other than quetiapine in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). CONCLUSIONS: This umbrella review indicates a lack of high-quality studies of antipsychotics in anxiety disorders outside of the use of quetiapine in GAD. Although potentially effective for anxiety disorders, FGAs and SGAs may have risks and side effects that outweigh their efficacy, although there were limited data. Further long-term and larger-scale studies of antipsychotics in anxiety disorders are needed.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Trastornos de Ansiedad , Humanos , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Trastornos de Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , PubMed , Fumarato de Quetiapina , Trifluoperazina , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Metaanálisis como Asunto
20.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 30(2): 183-199, 2024 Feb 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38308625

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia is a chronic, relapsing, and burdensome psychiatric disorder affecting approximately 0.25%-0.6% of the US population. Oral antipsychotic treatment (OAT) remains the cornerstone for managing schizophrenia. However, nonadherence and high treatment failure lead to increased disease burden and medical spending. Cost-effective management of schizophrenia requires understanding the value of current therapies to facilitate better planning of management policies while addressing unmet needs. OBJECTIVE: To review existing evidence and gaps regarding real-world effectiveness and economic and humanistic outcomes of OATs, including asenapine, brexpiprazole, cariprazine, iloperidone, lumateperone, lurasidone, olanzapine/samidorphan, paliperidone, and quetiapine. METHODS: We conducted a literature search using PubMed, American Psychological Association PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), and the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature from January 2010 to March 2022 as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. English-language articles describing adults with schizophrenia receiving at least 1 of the selected OATs and reporting real-world effectiveness, direct or indirect costs, humanistic outcomes, behavioral outcomes, adherence/persistence patterns, or product switching were identified. RESULTS: We identified 25 studies from a total of 24,190 articles. Real-world effectiveness, cost, and adherence/persistence outcomes were reported for most OATs that were selected. Humanistic outcomes and product switching were reported only for lurasidone. Behavioral outcomes (eg, interpersonal relations and suicide ideation) were not reported for any OAT. The key economic outcomes across studies were incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, cost per quality-adjusted life-years, and health care costs. In studies that compared long-acting injectables (LAIs) with OATs, LAIs had a higher pharmacy and lower medical costs, while total health care cost was similar between LAIs and OATs. Indirect costs associated with presenteeism, absenteeism, or work productivity were not reported for any of the selected OATs. Overall, patients had poor adherence to OATs, ranging between 20% and 61% across studies. Product switching did not impact the all-cause health care costs before and after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed considerable gaps exist for evidence on behavioral outcomes, humanistic outcomes, medication switching, and adherence/persistence across OATs. Our findings also suggest an unmet need regarding treatment nonadherence and lack of persistence among patients receiving OATs. We identified a need for research addressing OATs' behavioral and humanistic outcomes and evaluating the impact of product switching in adults with schizophrenia in the United States, which could assist clinicians in promoting patient-centered care and help payers understand the total value of new antipsychotic drugs.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Esquizofrenia , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Clorhidrato de Lurasidona/uso terapéutico , Palmitato de Paliperidona , Fumarato de Quetiapina/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA