RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The previous popularity of adjustable gastric banding (AGB), along with inconsistent long-term results, has resulted in the need for conversion to other procedures. The perioperative safety of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and gastric bypass (RYGB) as single-stage conversion procedures is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To compare the early safety of SG and RYGB when performed as single-stage conversion procedures at the time of AGB removal. SETTING: Nationwide analysis of accredited centers. METHODS: The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality and Improvement Program public use file for 2015 was queried for all patients who underwent single-stage conversion to SG or RYGB. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to control for baseline differences, and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals are reported. RESULTS: There were 4865 patients who underwent a single-stage AGB conversion. SG was performed in 3364 (69.1%). The 30-day reoperation (1.6% versus 2.7%, P = .008), readmission (4% versus 5.7%, P = .006), reintervention (1.7% versus 2.7%, P = .024), and overall morbidity (2.9% versus 6.5%, P<.0001) were significantly less common in the SG group. After controlling for baseline characteristics, RYGB was independently associated with higher overall 30-day reoperation (OR 1.81, 1.19-2.75), readmission (OR 1.42, 1.07-1.88), reintervention (OR 1.59, 1.06-2.4), and overall morbidity (OR 2.17, 1.62-2.9). CONCLUSIONS: AGB conversions are associated with low overall 30-day event rates. Patients undergoing RYGB as a single-stage conversion experience higher complication rates and the need for additional early procedures compared with SG.
Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía/métodos , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Gastroplastia/métodos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Femenino , Gastrectomía/normas , Derivación Gástrica/normas , Gastroplastia/normas , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad/tendencias , New York/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pérdida de PesoAsunto(s)
Anestesiólogos , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Gastroplastia/métodos , Anestesiólogos/normas , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/normas , Gastroplastia/efectos adversos , Gastroplastia/normas , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/normas , Obesidad/cirugíaRESUMEN
The laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) procedure has been used in bariatric surgery for over 20 years, and despite its initial success, it has been most often criticized for causing adverse effects, lacking efficacy, and frequently requiring revision. Evidence-based medicine supports these criticisms, and the LAGB is no longer considered by most bariatric surgeons worldwide to be a standard operation. While we have to admit that its associated food tolerance issues and variable efficacy make the LAGB less desirable for most patients, time will tell whether the current armamentarium of bariatric procedures are still too aggressive and new safer procedures still need to be developed.
Asunto(s)
Gastroplastia/métodos , Gastroplastia/tendencias , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Cirugía Bariátrica/métodos , Cirugía Bariátrica/tendencias , Gastroplastia/normas , Hospitalización , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Obesidad Mórbida/epidemiología , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is associated with improved co-morbidities, quality of life, and survival in severely obese patients. Common bariatric surgery procedures include Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB), and sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Currently, literature studying comparative effectiveness on different bariatric surgery procedures in veterans is limited. OBJECTIVES: To compare effectiveness of 3 bariatric surgery procedures performed in veterans. SETTING: Veterans Affairs Loma Linda Healthcare Systems (VALLHS), Loma Linda, California, United States. METHODS: This study was a single-institution, retrospective cohort study. Primary outcome was weight reduction, expressed as kilograms lost, body mass index (BMI) reduction, percentage weight loss (%WL), and percentage excess weight loss (%EWL) after 12 months of bariatric surgery. Secondary outcomes were reduction in number of medications and laboratory markers for obesity-related chronic conditions. Inverse-probability weighting propensity score method was used to balance baseline characteristics among the procedures. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients were included in the study. At 12 months, the kilograms lost, BMI reduction, %WL, and %EWL were 40.7±14.5 kg, 13.4±4.1 kg/m(2), 31.5±8.5%, and 41.4±11.6% for RYGB; 24.4±22.1 kg, 7.9±7.3 kg/m(2), 20.2±21.5%, and 26.7±27.6% for SG; and 15.3±15.7 kg, 5.0±5.0 kg/m(2), 12.0±11.7%, and 16.1±15.9% for LAGB, respectively (RYGB versus SG, RYGB versus LAGB, and SG versus LAGB, all P<.01). The reduction in number of medications, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) also showed significant improvement with RYGB. CONCLUSION: For the short term, RYGB appears to achieve better weight reduction and management of obesity-associated co-morbid conditions compared with the SG and LAGB procedures in veteran patients. SG could be the next alternative over LAGB for the bariatric surgery procedure in patients who are not candidates for RYGB.
Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía/normas , Derivación Gástrica/normas , Gastroplastia/normas , Laparoscopía/normas , Análisis de Varianza , Índice de Masa Corporal , California , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pérdida de Peso/fisiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: No bariatric procedure is perfect, and a plethora of such procedures itself is a proof for the same. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding has a high safety profile, but also a high rate of re-operation has been reported (Schouten, Wiryasaputra, van Dielen et al. Obes Surg 20(12):1617-26, 2010). Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is becoming popular, but has its own set of complications and is irreversible. We introduced laparoscopic adjustable gastric banded plication (LAGBP) in 2009 (Huang, Lo, Shabbir et al. Surg Obes Relat Dis 8(1):41-5, 2012) In a case matched comparative study with LSG, LAGBP showed similar results at 2 years in terms of weight loss, comorbidity resolution, and complications. (Huang, Chhabra, Goel et al. Obes Surg 23(8):1319-23, 2013). Several authors have reported variations in their technique, bougie size, and suture material used to perform plication. (Ramos, Galvao Neto, Galvao et al. Obes Surg 20(7):913-8, 2010, (Mui, Lee, Lam et al. Obes Surg 23(2): 179-83, 2013, Brethauer, Harris, Kroh et al. Surg Obes Relat Dis 7(1):15-22, 2011) Our initial technique of placing the band first and then plicating the stomach resulted in higher incidence of gastric fundus herniation compared to that reported in a systematic review (Abdelbaki, Huang, Ramos et al. Obes Surg 22(10):1633-9, 2012). After the first 65 cases, we reversed the order by performing the gastric plication first which ensures proper plication of the fundus and a more uniformly placed plication line. This technique has become our standard, and the same is described in this video in a stepwise fashion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed LAGBP in 202 cases over the last 4 years and recorded the findings. Our standardized technique is shown in this video. The T-suspension technique was used for liver retraction. (Zachariah, Tai, Chang et al. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23(4):311-5, 2013) Gastric plication formula is shown in Fig. 1. Fig. 1 Gastric plication formula RESULTS: Two hundred two (69 male, 133 female) patients in over the last 4 years underwent LAGBP. Follow-up at 1 year was 168 patients, and 56 patients reached 4-year follow-up. Age was 16-60 years (mean = 31.1). Mean BMI was 39.5 ± 3.18 and body weight 110 kg ± 19.4. Mean operative time was 104 min ± 39 and length of hospital stay after surgery 2.1 ± 2.3 days. No mortality was recorded. Excess weight loss at 1 year was 57.84 % and at four years 68 %. CONCLUSION: LAGBP has been proven to be an effective bariatric procedure in the midterm results. Standardization with plication first and then placement of the band could be important to achieve best outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Gastroplastia/normas , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Gastroplastia/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/normas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pérdida de Peso , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Surgical interventions have proven to be more effective than other measures in the treatment of morbid obesity. The short-term outcomes of the various surgical interventions have been well documented in the literature, with fewer reports on long-term outcomes. The reported long-term outcome of the vertical-banded gastroplasty (VBG) is conflicting. The aim of the present study was to evaluate our long-term experience with VBG. A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was conducted. Records of patients who underwent VBG five or more years ago were retrieved. An analysis of the long-term weight changes and reported complications was conducted. The study included 150 patients: 43 males (29%) and 107 females (71%). Their mean age was 30 years old (12-53), and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 47 ± 8.4 kg/m2. Patients were followed up for an average of 8 years (5-11). More than 60 % of patients had good long-term weight loss (EWL > 50%). A significant negative correlation was found between the excess weight loss percent (EWL%) and the pre-operative BMI (p < 0.05). The differences in EWL% between males and females were not significant (p = 0.061). Nevertheless, the change in EWL% over time for both males and females was significant (p = 0.004). Revision surgery was required in seven patients (4.7%). Five patients had conversion of VBG to gastric bypass (3.3%), while two patients (1.3%) had reversal of the procedure. Late complications included mesh erosion in three cases, staple line dehiscence in two patients, and stomal stenosis in six patients. VBG could be a long-term effective intervention for the treatment of morbid obesity. Good selection is the cornerstone for long-term success. Late complication rate is acceptable after VBG. VBG is a specifically useful tool under stringent financial circumstances.
Asunto(s)
Gastroplastia , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Selección de Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Índice de Masa Corporal , Niño , Egipto/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Gastroplastia/normas , Gastroplastia/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastroplastia/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/epidemiología , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Since Januaryâ1st 2005, the situation of bariatric surgery has been examined in Germany. All data are registered prospectively in cooperation with the Institute of Quality Assurance in Surgery at the Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg. METHODS: The voluntary data registration occurs in an internet online data bank. All primary bariatric procedures as well as re- and redo-procedures are documented. Follow-up data were collected once a year. Participation in the quality assurance study is obligatory for certificated centres. RESULTS: Since 2005 13,879 bariatric procedures have been performed at 83âhospitals. The number of primary procedures has increased from 596 in 2005 to 11,835 in 2010. Revisional surgery has been performed in 1,438âpatients since 2005. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the major procedure with 1,564âoperations in 2010. The mean BMI was 48.8 kg/m². The incidence of comorbidities was 84.8%. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery has become more accepted in Germany. Beside the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy is the most frequently performed operation. BMI and incidence of comorbidities are still high in comparison with literature values. Due to the lack of evidence, more randomised studies are necessary to standardise operative techniques and evaluate patient selection criteria. Quality assurance studies support a detailed analysis of these parameters.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica/normas , Recolección de Datos/normas , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Cirugía Bariátrica/tendencias , Índice de Masa Corporal , Niño , Comorbilidad , Recolección de Datos/tendencias , Femenino , Derivación Gástrica/normas , Derivación Gástrica/tendencias , Gastroplastia/normas , Gastroplastia/tendencias , Alemania , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/normas , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Selección de Paciente , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/tendencias , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Since 1 January 2005, the situation of bariatric surgery has been examined in Germany. All data are registered prospectively in cooperation with the Institute of Quality Assurance in Surgery at the Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg. Data are registered in an internet online database. Data collection on the results of sleeve gastrectomy was started in 2006. Follow-up data were collected once a year. Participation in the quality assurance study is voluntary. Since 2005, 3,125 sleeve gastrectomies have been performed in 80 hospitals. The number of procedures has increased from 1 in 2005 to 1,564 in 2010. Initially, the leakage rate was 7 % in 2007. The leakage rate dropped to 1.7 in 2010. The mean age of patients was 43.5 years and mean body mass index (BMI) was 52.03 kg/m(2). BMI and comorbidities are significantly higher in male than in female patients. The leakage rate in female patients was, at 1.60 %, significantly lower than in male patients, at 3.28 %. Sleeve gastrectomy is becoming more and more popular in Germany. But the postoperative complication rate is still high. Data from the nationwide survey of bariatric surgery in Germany show significant differences in preoperative comorbidities and complication rates between male and female patients. There is a need for further evaluation of gender-specific aspects to optimize patient selection and reduce specific postoperative complications.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica/normas , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Enfermedades Pulmonares/epidemiología , Obesidad Mórbida/epidemiología , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Adulto , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Gastroplastia/normas , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución por Sexo , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica/educación , Habilitación Profesional/normas , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/normas , Gastroplastia/educación , Laparoscopía/normas , Cirugía Bariátrica/normas , Gastroplastia/normas , Humanos , Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations , Privilegios del Cuerpo Médico/normas , Sociedades Médicas , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Vertical gastroplasty (VG) was worldwide and until recently a very popular restrictive bariatric procedure. Unfortunately, many patients required revisional surgery for failure of this technique. The present study aimed to evaluate retrospectively the feasibility, safety, and efficiency of conversion of failed VGs to laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). METHODS: Forty patients underwent LAGB as revisional surgery between August 2001 and June 2008. Preceding VGs were performed either by open procedure {silastic ring vertical gastroplasty (SRVG, n = 21) and vertical-banded gastroplasty (VBG, n = 10)} or by laparoscopy {laparoscopic silastic ring vertical gastroplasty (L-SRVG, n = 9)}. The delay between initial and revisional surgery was significantly shorter for SRVG (5.5 +/- 1.7 years; p < 0.001) as compared to VBG and L-SRVG (9.2 +/- 2.3 and 9.4 +/- 1.8 years, respectively). The reasons for failure of the VG were: disruption of the staple line (n = 23), excessive enlargement of the gastric pouch (n = 15) and inefficient stoma (n = 2). Patients were qualified for revisional surgery in case of uncontrolled weight regain with or without frequent vomiting. RESULTS: There were three conversions from laparoscopy to laparotomy (7.5%). There was no mortality. Minor morbidity was 12.5%. There were two major complications (5%); one incarcerated port-site hernia requiring small bowel resection, and one band erosion necessitating band removal. The mean BMI dropped from 38.9 kg/m(2) before revision to 30.7 kg/m(2) after conversion to LAGB (follow-up 6-88 months). CONCLUSIONS: Conversion of failed VGs to gastric banding is safe and efficient. The morbidity rate is acceptable. Gastric banding to correct failing VG is a reasonable option when performed in selected patients.
Asunto(s)
Gastroplastia , Laparoscopía/métodos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Falla de Equipo , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Gastroplastia/instrumentación , Gastroplastia/métodos , Gastroplastia/normas , Humanos , Laparotomía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Aumento de Peso , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has been used as a first step of a two-stage approach in bariatric surgery for high-risk patients. Recently, LSG is being utilized as a primary and final procedure for morbid obesity with acceptable short-term results. The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of LSG as a revisional procedure for patients with unsatisfactory outcomes after laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB). A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed. Data were reviewed for all patients undergoing revision from LAGB to LSG during the period May 2005 and May 2009. Data collected included demographics, indication for revision, operative time, length of stay, postoperative complications, and degree of weight reduction. Fifteen patients (three males and 12 females) had revisional surgery converting a LAGB to a LSG. The indication in four patients (26.66%) was weight regains and in five patients (33.33%) was poor weight loss; four patients (26.66%) had a band slippage and symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux, and one patient (6.66%) had poor weight loss, band slippage, and reflux. In one patient (6.66%), the indication was slippage and duodenal fistula. One-step revision procedure was done in 13 patients (86.66%), while two-step procedure was done in two patients (13.33%). Mean preoperative weight and BMI were 233.02 (181.4-300) lb and 38.66 (29.7-49.3) kg/m2, respectively. Mean weight loss at 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively was 20.7, 48.3, 57.2, 60.1, and 13.5 lb, respectively. Mean % excess BMI loss was 28.9%, 64.2%, 65.3%, 65.7%, and 22.25% at 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. There was one major complication (staple line leak) and one postoperative acute gastric outlet obstruction. We had no mortality. Thirteen patients were followed up postoperatively. The number decreased as follow-up time progressed. LSG could provide short-term weight loss after previously failed LABG, but prone to more complications compared to an initial LSG without a prior bariatric procedure.
Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía/normas , Gastroplastia/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/normas , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Algoritmos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Gastrectomía/métodos , Gastroplastia/normas , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación/métodos , Reoperación/normas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pérdida de Peso , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Obesity affects 50% of adults and 18% of children in the USA. It has wide-ranging comorbidities with clinical, psychosocial, and economic ramifications. Obesity refers to a condition of excess body fat. The basis for weight gain is a fundamental imbalance between caloric intake and output, but individual variation based on genetics, metabolism, and diverse environmental triggers is seen. Although modifications to our obesogenic society and education about the risks in our environment may lead to a decrease in the incidence of obesity through prevention, treatment for those already obese is critically important. In adults, the most successful treatment programs for obesity include a surgical procedure. This article discusses the problems obesity presents to children and their families, highlights the unique aspects of treating obesity in children, reviews the currently utilized bariatric surgical procedures, and introduces those bariatric procedures that are under development. When considering whether to use bariatric surgical procedures in a multidisciplinary weight management program for children, the special needs and characteristics of children with a severe weight problem must be considered. Development of bariatric surgical techniques and devices and implementation of these tools in multidisciplinary weight management programs need greater attention. This will require the combined efforts of the pediatric health care providers from many specialties and partnerships with industry to facilitate discovery and implementation.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica/normas , Obesidad/cirugía , Pérdida de Peso , Adolescente , Cirugía Bariátrica/métodos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Niño , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Balón Gástrico/normas , Gastroplastia/normas , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Since January 1st 2005, the situation of bariatric surgery in Germany has been examined. The data are registered in cooperation with the Institute of Quality Assurance in Surgery at the Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg. METHODS: The data registration took place prospectively in an internet online data base. All primary bariatric procedures performed since January 1st 2005 were detected as well as re-operations in patients who had been operated before. RESULTS: 629 patients underwent bariatric surgery in 21 hospitals in 2005 and 828 patients were operated in 32 hospitals in 2006. The mostly performed operation was gastric banding with 46.8 %, followed by Roux-Y gastric bypass with 38.5 %. 74.4 % of the patients were female. The medium BMI of all patients was 48.5 kg/m2 in 2005 and 48.4 kg/m2 in 2006. Follow-up data were available for 71.2 % of the patients operated in 2005. These data show a higher reduction of BMI after malabsorptive than after restrictive bariatric procedures. CONCLUSION: A trend from restrictive bariatric procedures to a malabsorptive approach could be observed. In Germany the BMI of patients undergoing bariatric surgery is higher than in most countries world-wide. No differences could be detected in intraoperative and short-term complications as well in the complication rate in the first year of follow-up in comparison with the literature.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica/normas , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/normas , Adulto , Cirugía Bariátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Femenino , Derivación Gástrica/normas , Derivación Gástrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastroplastia/normas , Gastroplastia/estadística & datos numéricos , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Revisión de Utilización de Recursos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
This paper presents, for the first time, a physics-based modeling technique for the Lap-Band (Inamed Health) used in laparoscopic gastric banding (LAGB) operations for treating the morbidly obese. A virtual LAGB simulator can help train medical students as well as surgeons who embark at learning this relatively new operation. The Lap-Band has different thickness and curvature along the centerline, and therefore leads to different deformation behaviors. A hybrid modeling strategy is therefore adopted to successfully replicate its dynamics. A mass-spring model, used to model the less stiff part, is coupled to a quasi-static articulated link model for the more stiff and inextensible part. The virtual Lap-Band model has been implemented into a complete graphics-haptics-physics-based system with two PHANToM Omni devices (from Sensible Technologies) being used for real-time bimanual interaction with force feedback.
Asunto(s)
Simulación por Computador , Gastroplastia/métodos , Laparoscopía , Interfaz Usuario-Computador , Competencia Clínica , Gastroplastia/educación , Gastroplastia/normas , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
The decision to perform gastroplasty must be made by a multidisciplinary team. This organization ensures compliance with good practice guidelines. Multidisciplinary management after surgery is also essential but patients' adhesion to follow-up is relatively poor.
Asunto(s)
Gastroplastia/normas , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Francia , Hospitales , HumanosRESUMEN
The high prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in Western societies has accelerated the need for new modalities of treatment. Currently, medical and surgical therapies are widely accepted among patients and physicians. New potent antisecretory drugs and the development of minimally invasive surgery for the management of GERD are at present the pivotal and largely accepted approaches to treatment. The minimally invasive treatment revolution, however, has stimulated several new endoscopic techniques for GERD. Up to now, the data is limited and further studies are necessary to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the various endoscopic techniques to medical and laparoscopic management of GERD. New journal articles and abstracts are continuously being published. The Food and Drug Administration has approved 3 modalities, thus gastroenterologists and surgeons are beginning to apply these techniques. Further trials and device refinements will assist clinicians. This article will present an overview of the various techniques that are currently on study. This review will report the efficacy and durability of various endoscopic therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The potential for widespread use of these techniques will also be discussed. Articles and abstracts published in English on this topic were retrieved from Pubmed. Due to limited number of studies and remarkable differences between various trials, strict criteria were not used for the pooled data presented, however, an effort was made to avoid bias by including only studies that used off-PPI scoring as baseline and intent to treat.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Endoscopía/métodos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/terapia , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Ablación por Catéter/instrumentación , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/instrumentación , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/normas , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Gastroplastia/efectos adversos , Gastroplastia/instrumentación , Gastroplastia/métodos , Gastroplastia/normas , Humanos , Hidrogeles/uso terapéutico , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Selección de Paciente , Polimetil Metacrilato/uso terapéutico , Polivinilos/uso terapéutico , Prótesis e Implantes/efectos adversos , Prótesis e Implantes/normas , Técnicas de Sutura/efectos adversos , Técnicas de Sutura/instrumentación , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Since January 1st 2005, the situation of bariatric surgery has been examined in Germany. The data are registered in cooperation with the An-institute of quality control in surgery at the Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg. The data registration occurs in an internet on-line data bank. Application for participation in this study is available on our correspondence address. All hospitals carrying out bariatric surgery are asked to take part in this study.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica/normas , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/normas , Bases de Datos como Asunto , Gastroplastia/normas , Alemania , Humanos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Sistema de RegistrosAsunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica/normas , Competencia Clínica , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Cirugía Bariátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación Gástrica/normas , Derivación Gástrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastroplastia/normas , Gastroplastia/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de SaludRESUMEN
Quality assurance is a function that exists in manufacturing,engineering, and the service industry. Bariatric surgery is an undertaking with a special form of consumer product and service. In this day of limited resources and significant value exchanges among stakeholders (ie, patients, surgeons, third-party payers),the goal of the bariatric community is to deliver quality outcomes with safety, efficacy, and efficiency. The American Society for Bariatric Surgery and the Surgical Review Corporation, in conjunction with the bariatric community, will use quality assurance methods to produce quality outcomes that will satisfy the value exchanges of all stakeholders.