Gefitinib (an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor) plus anlotinib (an multikinase inhibitor) for untreated, EGFR-mutated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (FL-ALTER): a multicenter phase III trial.

Dual inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathways offers the prospect of improving the effectiveness of EFGR-targeted therapy. In this phase 3 study (ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT04028778), 315 patients with treatment-naïve, EGFR-mutated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomized (1:1) to receive anlotinib or placebo plus gefitinib once daily on days 1-14 per a 3-week cycle. At the prespecified final analysis of progression-free survival (PFS), a significant improvement in PFS was observed for the anlotinib arm over the placebo arm (hazards ratio [HR] = 0.64, 95% CI, 0.48-0.80, P = 0.003). Particularly, patients with brain metastasis and those harboring EGFR amplification or high tumor mutation load gained significant more benefits in PFS from gefitinib plus anlotinib. The incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events was 49.7% of the patients receiving gefitinib plus anlotinib versus 31.0% of the patients receiving gefitinib plus placebo. Anlotinib plus gefitinib significantly improves PFS in patients with treatment-naïve, EGFR-mutated, advanced NSCLC, with a manageable safety profile.

Genetic Variants in the ABCB1 and ABCG2 Gene Drug Transporters Involved in Gefitinib-Associated Adverse Reaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to verify the association between the genetic variants of adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-binding cassette subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1) and ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 2 (ABCG2) genes and the presence and severity of gefitinib-associated adverse reactions. We systematically searched PubMed, Virtual Health Library/Bireme, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases for relevant studies published up to February 2024. In total, five studies were included in the review. Additionally, eight genetic variants related to ABCB1 (rs1045642, rs1128503, rs2032582, and rs1025836) and ABCG2 (rs2231142, rs2231137, rs2622604, and 15622C>T) genes were analyzed. Meta-analysis showed a significant association between the ABCB1 gene rs1045642 TT genotype and presence of diarrhea (OR = 5.41, 95% CI: 1.38-21.14, I2 = 0%), the ABCB1 gene rs1128503 TT genotype and CT + TT group and the presence of skin rash (OR = 4.37, 95% CI: 1.51-12.61, I2 = 0% and OR = 6.99, 95%CI: 1.61-30.30, I2= 0%, respectively), and the ABCG2 gene rs2231142 CC genotype and presence of diarrhea (OR = 3.87, 95% CI: 1.53-9.84, I2 = 39%). No ABCB1 or ABCG2 genes were positively associated with the severity of adverse reactions associated with gefitinib. In conclusion, this study showed that ABCB1 and ABCG2 variants are likely to exhibit clinical implications in predicting the presence of adverse reactions to gefitinib.

New-onset keratitis associated with epidermal growth factor receptor-based targeted therapies in Han Chinese patients with lung cancer: A multi-center cohort study.

PURPOSE: To determine the risk and incidence of keratitis following treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRi) and subtypes of EGFRi-associated keratitis. METHODS: This multi-center cohort study included EGFRi-treated patients and non-users with lung cancer between 2010 and 2023. EGFRi included first-generation agent gefitinib and erlotinib, second-generation agent afatinib, and third-generation agent osimertinib. The primary outcome was new-onset keratitis. Cox proportional hazard models with multivariable adjustment were applied to determine the effect of EGFRi on keratitis over time. Subgroup analyses were conducted, stratified by agents of EGFRi. Sub-outcome analyses were performed to identify the subtypes of EGFRi-associated keratitis. RESULTS: A total of 1549 EGFRi-treated patients and 6146 non-users were included. 38 (2.5%) EGFRi-treated patients developed keratitis. The incidence of keratitis in EGFRi-treated patients was significantly higher than that in controls (incidence rate, IR, per 1000 person-years = 14.7 vs 4.49, p < 0.0001). EGFRi-treated patients presented with an increased risk for keratitis (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR = 3.14, 95% CI = 1.85-5.35, p < 0.001). Erlotinib (aHR = 2.64, 95% CI = 1.35-5.15, p = 0.004), afatinib (aHR = 4.42, 95% CI = 2.17-9.02, p < 0.001), and osimertinib (aHR = 4.67, 95% CI = 1.60-13.64, p = 0.005), but not gefitinib (aHR = 2.30, 95% CI = 0.96-5.55, p = 0.063), significantly contributed to the risk of keratitis. Subtypes of EGFRi-associated keratitis included corneal ulcer (IR = 2.31 vs 0.166, p < 0.0001) and keratoconjunctivitis (IR = 9.27 vs 2.91, p < 0.0001). None of the EGFRi-treated patients developed perforated corneal ulcer, interstitial and deep keratitis, or corneal neovascularization. CONCLUSION: Treatment with EGFRi was associated with an increased risk of keratitis. Ocular toxicity of EGFRi was highest for third-generation agents, followed by second-generation agents, and then first-generation agents.

HSP70 Is a Critical Regulator of HSP90 Inhibitor's Effectiveness in Preventing HCl-Induced Chronic Lung Injury and Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Exposure to hydrochloric acid (HCl) can provoke acute and chronic lung injury. Because of its extensive production for industrial use, frequent accidental exposures occur, making HCl one of the top five chemicals causing inhalation injuries. There are no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatments for HCl exposure. Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitors modulate transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) signaling and the development of chemical-induced pulmonary fibrosis. However, little is known on the role of Heat Shock Protein 70 (HSP70) during injury and treatment with HSP90 inhibitors. We hypothesized that administration of geranylgeranyl-acetone (GGA), an HSP70 inducer, or gefitinib (GFT), an HSP70 suppressant, alone or in combination with the HSP90 inhibitor, TAS-116, would improve or worsen, respectively, HCl-induced chronic lung injury in vivo and endothelial barrier dysfunction in vitro. GGA, alone, improved HCl-induced human lung microvascular endothelial cells (HLMVEC) barrier dysfunction and, in combination with TAS-116, improved the protective effect of TAS-116. In mice, GGA reduced HCl toxicity and while TAS-116 alone blocked HCl-induced chronic lung injury, co-administration with GGA, resulted in further improvement. Conversely, GFT potentiated HCl-induced barrier dysfunction and impaired the antidotal effects of TAS-116. We conclude that combined treatments with HSP90 inhibitors and HSP70 inducers may represent a novel therapeutic approach to manage HCl-induced chronic lung injury and pulmonary fibrosis.

Efficacy and Safety of Re-administration of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) After EGFR-TKI-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease (CS-Lung-005).

PURPOSE: This study investigated the safety and efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) re-administration after recovery from EGFR-TKI-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD). METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study collected data from consecutive advanced NSCLC patients who underwent EGFR-TKI re-administration after recovery from EGFR-TKI-induced ILD. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were registered. The grades of initial TKI-induced ILD were grade 1 to 4. TKIs used for re-administration were erlotinib for 15 patients, osimertinib for 15, gefitinib for 14, afatinib for 13 patients, and dacomitinib for 1 patient. ILD recurred in 13 patients (22.4%), comprising 3 patients with grade 1, 6 patients with grade 2, and 4 patients with grade 3. No significant associations were found between ILD recurrence and age, smoking history, performance status, time from initial ILD to TKI re-administration, or concomitant corticosteroid use. However, the incidence of ILD recurrence was high in cases of repeated use of gefitinib or erlotinib or first time use of osimertinib at TKI re-administration. The ILD recurrence rate was lowest in patients treated with first time use of gefitinib (8%) or erlotinib (8%), followed by patients treated with repeated use of osimertinib (9%). The response rate, median progression-free survival by TKI re-administration, and median overall survival were 55%, 9.6 and 84.8 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study showed that EGFR-TKI re-administration is a feasible and effective treatment for patients who recovered from EGFR-TKI-induced ILD. Our results indicate that re-administration of EGFR-TKI is an important option for long-term prognosis after recovery from EGFR-TKI-induced ILD.

Effectiveness and safety of afatinib, gefitinib, and erlotinib for treatment-naïve elderly patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multi-institute retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: In real-world practice, most patients with lung cancer are diagnosed when they are aged ≥65 years. However, clinical trials tend to lack data for the elderly population. Therefore, we aimed to describe the effectiveness and safety of afatinib, gefitinib, and erlotinib for elderly patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Treatment-naïve patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC were enrolled at many hospitals in Taiwan. Patient characteristics and the effectiveness and safety of afatinib, gefitinib, and erlotinib were compared. RESULTS: This study enrolled 1,343 treatment-naïve patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, of whom 554 were aged <65 years, 383 were aged 65-74 years, 323 were aged 75-84 years, and 83 were aged ≥85 years. For elderly patients, afatinib was more effective, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 14.7 months and overall survival (OS) of 22.2 months, than gefitinib (9.9 months and 17.7 months, respectively) and erlotinib (10.8 months and 18.5 months, respectively; PFS: p = 0.003; OS: p = 0.026). However, grade ≥3 adverse events, including skin toxicities, paronychia, mucositis, and diarrhea, were more frequently experienced by patients receiving afatinib than those receiving gefitinib or erlotinib. CONCLUSIONS: This large retrospective study provides real-world evidence of the effectiveness and safety of EGFR-TKIs for elderly patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, a population that is often underrepresented in clinical trials and real-world evidence. Afatinib was more effective as a first-line treatment than gefitinib or erlotinib for elderly patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC.

Sensorineural hearing loss induced by gefitinib: A CARE-compliant case report and literature reviews.

RATIONALE: Gefitinib is a potent and selective orally active growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is commonly used to treat advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with activating EGFR mutations. Hearing impairment with gefitinib was sparsely reported. In this report, we describe a case of sensorineural deafness associated with the administration of gefitinib, with a Naranjo score of 7. PATIENT CONCERNS: An 81-year-old female was diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma with bone metastasis and an EGFR-activating mutation. The patient was prescribed gefitinib tablets at a daily dose of 250 mg for lung adenocarcinoma treatment. However, the patient experienced moderate to severe bilateral sensorineural deafness, primarily in her right ear, after taking gefitinib. Following the cessation of gefitinib administration, the patient exhibited partial restoration of auditory function. Upon resuming the medication, she experienced a worsening of deafness. DIAGNOSES: The otoscopic audiogram and hearing test indicated moderate to severe bilateral sensorineural deafness. INTERVENTIONS: The otolaryngologist recommended bilateral hearing aids to enhance hearing function. OUTCOMES: Throughout our follow-up period, the patient did not receive a hearing aid implant. LESSONS: This article first reported the ototoxicity caused by gefitinib. While rare, our report highlights that gefitinib-induced sensorineural deafness is possible and its mechanisms are still unclear. This adverse reaction should be monitored closely during clinical application of gefitinib to improve patient outcomes.

Gefitinib-induced Myositis: A Novel Case Report.

Chemotherapy-induced myositis is a severe adverse event caused by chemotherapeutic agents such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or cytotoxic agents. We experienced a patient with gefitinib-induced myositis with symptoms of muscle cramps and stiffness in the limbs, and reported the treatment process. A 70-year-old woman received four courses of carboplatin (CBDCA)+pemetrexed (PEM)+gefitinib (intravenous CBDCA area under the curve (AUC) 5 and PEM 500 mg/m2, every 3 weeks, and oral gefitinib 250 mg daily), for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive stage IV lung cancer treatment; followed by seven courses of PEM+gefitinib, and continued gefitinib monotherapy thereafter. Myositis occurred 5 months after the initiation of gefitinib monotherapy. She developed strong limb cramps despite regular oral administration of 400 mg acetaminophen three times a day and complained of pain on a numeric rating scale of 10/10. Her creatine kinase (CK) was elevated from the second course of CBDCA+PEM+gefitinib but was stable at grade 1-2 thereafter. However, the muscle symptoms disappeared with CK normalization within a few days of gefitinib discontinuation due to disease progression. The Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Scale score was 6, suggesting a probable association. Osimertinib (an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor)-induced myositis has been reported, but similar events were first observed with gefitinib in this case. Consequently, when treating with gefitinib, myositis, including the CK variation, should be monitored and appropriately managed with multidirectional treatment.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability, and feasibility of apatinib in combination with gefitinib in stage IIIB-IV EGFR-mutated non-squamous NSCLC: a drug-drug interaction study.

PURPOSE: Apatinib combined with gefitinib was proven to benefit advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients in first-line treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the drug-drug interaction of gefitinib and apatinib when coadministered in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. METHODS: In this phase 1b, multi-center, open-label, fixed-sequence study, the drug-drug interaction of gefitinib and apatinib was evaluated when coadministered in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. Patients received single-agent apatinib 500 mg QD on days 1-4. Gefitinib 250 mg QD was given on days 5-15 and combined with apatinib 500 mg QD on days 12-15. Serial blood samples were drawn on days 4 and 15. The plasma concentrations and other pharmacokinetics parameters were measured for apatinib with and without gefitinib. RESULTS: The study enrolled 22 patients and 20 were analyzed for pharmacokinetics. There were no distinct differences in apatinib Cmax and AUC0-τ with versus without gefitinib (geometric LSM ratio, 0.96 [90% CI 0.84-1.10] for Cmax and 1.12 [90% CI 0.96-1.30] for AUC0-τ). Similar PFS and grade of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were found between different Cmax and AUC0-τ of apatinib and gefitinib at 500 mg apatinib and 250 mg gefitinib dose levels. CONCLUSIONS: Apatinib pharmacokinetics parameters were not significantly changed when coadministered with gefitinib. All TEAEs were manageable, and there was no need to change the dose level when combining apatinib and gefitinib (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04390984, May 18, 2020).

Gefitinib Increases the Incidence of QT Prolongation in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Gefitinib (GEF) may increase the risk of corrected QT prolongation (QTc). We aimed to evaluate whether gefitinib increases the risk of corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation and analyze the associated risk factors.A total of 122 cases of advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received gefitinib therapy from January 2015 to December 2020 were evaluated. The results of at least two resting 12-lead electrocardiogram before and after gefitinib treatment were obtained. The Bazett and Fridericia formulas were used to calculate the QTc interval, and the changes of QTc interval values before and after treatment were evaluated. The correlation between gefitinib and QTc interval prolongation and related risk factors were analyzed.After gefitinib-targeted therapy, 23 patients (18.9%) had a prolonged QTc interval, which increased from a mean of 446 ± 25 ms at baseline to 478 ± 18 ms (P < 0.001). Three of the patients met criteria for Grade 3 QTc prolongation in the common term V5.0 for clinical adverse events. Univariate analysis showed that age (ORR, 1.054; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.003-1.107; P = 0.038), history of hypertension (ORR, 3.409; 95% CI, 1.334-8.713; P = 0.01), CCB medication history (ORR, 0.259; 95% CI, 0.094-0.712; P = 0.009), history of lung cancer surgery (ORR, 0.231; 95% CI, 0.064-0.829; P = 0.025), and baseline QT interval (ORR, 0.978; 95% CI, 0.964-0.993; P = 0.004) were important predictors of QTc interval prolongation in patients treated with gefitinib. The results of multivariate analysis showed that the history of lung cancer surgery and the baseline QT interval were important factors affecting QTc interval prolongation in patients treated with gefitinib.Gefitinib increases the risk of QTc prolongation in NSCLC patients, which may be more pronounced in patients with advanced age, hypertension, CCB therapy, lung cancer surgery, and a long QT interval at baseline.

Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy vs Gefitinib Alone in Untreated EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Patients With Brain Metastases: The GAP BRAIN Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study.

Importance: Use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is the standard therapy for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases. Several studies have shown that adding chemotherapy to EGFR-TKIs could improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC; however, the efficacy of these agents in patients with brain metastases remains unclear. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of gefitinib plus chemotherapy (pemetrexed with platinum) compared with gefitinib alone in patients with untreated EGFR-mutant NSCLC brain metastases. Design, Setting, and Participants: This open-label prospective, multicenter, phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted in 6 centers in China from January 13, 2016, to August 27, 2021. The median follow-up time was 21.1 months (IQR, 13.5-31.8 months). Patients with untreated confirmed brain metastases and EGFR-sensitive mutated NSCLC were enrolled. Interventions: The eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive gefitinib plus chemotherapy or gefitinib alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was intracranial PFS; secondary end points included PFS, overall survival (OS), intracranial objective response rate, overall objective response rate, and safety. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed. Results: A total of 161 patients (87 [54.0%] women; mean [SD] age, 55 [9.8] years; range, 26-80 years) were enrolled and randomized to receive gefitinib (n = 81) or gefitinib plus chemotherapy (n = 80). The median intracranial PFS was 15.6 months (95% CI, 14.3-16.9 months) in the gefitinib plus chemotherapy group vs 9.1 months (95% CI, 8.0-10.2 months) in the gefitinib group (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.25-0.53; P < .001). Similarly, the median PFS was significantly longer with gefitinib plus chemotherapy than gefitinib alone (16.3; 95% CI, 14.4-18.2 months vs 9.5; 95% CI, 8.3-10.8 months; P < .001). Gefitinib plus chemotherapy had a better intracranial objective response rate (85.0%; 95% CI, 77.0%-93.0% vs 63.0%; 95% CI, 52.2%-73.7%; P = .002) and overall objective response rate (80.0%; 95% CI, 71.0%-89.0% vs 64.2%; 95% CI, 53.5%-74.9%; P = .03) than gefitinib alone. At data cutoff, the median OS was also significantly longer in the gefitinib plus chemotherapy group vs the gefitinib group (35.0 vs 28.9 months; hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.43-0.99; P = .04). Grade 3 or worse adverse events were more common with gefitinib plus chemotherapy, most of which were manageable. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, gefitinib plus chemotherapy significantly improved intracranial PFS, PFS, and OS compared with gefitinib alone in patients with untreated EGFR-mutant NSCLC brain metastases and could be an optional first-line treatment for these patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01951469.

Study on the hepatotoxicity and potential mechanism of gefitinib based on CYP450 in mice and AML12 cells.

OBJECTIVES: Gefitinib is mainly used for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. Hepatotoxicity is one of the main side effects of gefitinib, and seriously affects the treatment process of the disease. However, the hepatotoxicity mechanism of gefitinib remains unclear. METHODS: The hepatotoxicity of different doses of gefitinib was investigated in mice and AML-12 cells, and the possible correlation of hepatotoxicity with CYP450 was analysed. KEY FINDINGS: The toxic effects of gefitinib were confirmed by the increased liver index, decreased body weight and survival rate, injured liver function and histopathology followed 16 days of oral administration. Gefitinib (400 mg/kg) upregulated the hepatic mRNA expression of CYP1A1 and downregulated the CYP2D9 and CYP2D10 in mice. Furthermore, we verified that gefitinib produced cytotoxicity on AML-12 cells in a dose and time-dependent manner, and confirmed that gefitinib (20 µM) induced cell apoptosis, upregulated mRNA expression of CYP1A1 and downregulated CYP2D9 and CYP2D10. Pearson correlation analysis also showed that the hepatotoxicity of gefitinib was positively correlated with CYP1A1 and negatively correlated with CYP2D9 and CYP2D10. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that the hepatotoxicity gefitinib may be associated with CYP1A1, CYP2D9 and CYP2D10. These findings will contribute to a better understanding of the mechanism of gefitinib hepatotoxicity.

Comparison of gefitinib plus chemotherapy versus gefitinib alone for advanced non­small­cell lung cancer: A meta analysis.

This study aimed to perform a meta­analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of gefitinib in combination with chemotherapy versus gefitinib alone in patients with advanced Non­Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). We searched databases for clinical studies that reported the efficacy or safety of gefitinib plus chemotherapy in comparison with gefitinib alone. Raw data from included studies were extracted and pooled to calculate the Odds Ratio (OR) for Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR), the Hazard Ratio (HR) for Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS), and OR for complication ≥ Grade 3. A total of 10 studies containing 1,528 patients with NSCLC were identified and included in the analysis. Gefitinib plus chemotherapy showed significantly better efficacy in improving ORR (OR = 1.54; 95% CI [Confidence Interval], 1.13‒2.1; p = 0.006), DCR (OR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.14‒2.29; p = 0.007), PFS (HR=1.67; 95% CI 1.45‒1.94; p < 0.001) and OS (HR = 1.49; 95% CI 1.2‒1.87; p < 0.001) as compared with gefitinib alone. Consistent results were observed in the sub-population with positive EGFR mutation. The combination of gefitinib with chemotherapy had a significantly higher risk of complication (≥ Grade 3) with an OR of 3.29 (95% CI 2.57‒4.21; p < 0.001). The findings in the present study suggest that the combination of gefitinib with chemotherapy can provide better disease response and survival outcomes for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Genetic variations in ABC transporter genes as a predictive biomarker for toxicity in North Indian lung cancer patients undergoing platinum-based doublet chemotherapy.

ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters are expressed in various human tissues and play a vital role in the efflux of various chemotherapeutic drugs. The current study has assessed genetic variants of ABCB1, ABCC1, ABCC2, and ABCG2 genes in 407 lung cancer patients undergoing platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. The association of ABCB1 (C1236 T, C3435 T, and G2677 T/A), ABCC1 (G3173 A and G2168 A),ABCC2 (G4544 A), and ABCG2 (C421 A) polymorphisms with chemotherapy-induced adverse events were assessed, and statistical analysis was conducted. Our data showed that patients harboring heterozygous (GA) genotype for ABCC1 G3173 A had an increased risk of developing leukopenia (odds ratio [OR] = 1.88, p = 0.04) and anemia (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.70, p = 0.03). For ABCC2 G4544 A polymorphism, patients harboring one copy of the mutant (GA) allele showed an increased risk of developing anemia (OR = 4.24, p = 0.03). After adjusting with various confounding factors, the heterozygous (GA) genotype showed a 5.63-fold increased risk of developing anemia (AOR = 5.63, p = 0.03). The ABCB1 G2677 A (OR = 0.37, p = 0.008) and ABCC1 G3173 A (OR = 0.54, p = 0.04) polymorphism showed a lower incidence of developing nephrotoxicity. In ABCG2 C421 A polymorphism, patients harboring heterozygous (CA) genotype had a lower incidence of having diarrhea (OR = 0.25, p = 0.04). An increased risk of having diarrhea was observed in the heterozygous genotype (GA) for ABCC1 G3173 A polymorphism (AOR = 2.78, p = 0.04). An increased risk of liver injury was found in the patients carrying heterozygous genotype of the ABCC1 G3173 A (OR = 2.06, p = 0.02) and ABCB1 C1236 T (OR = 1.85, p = 0.01). This study demonstrates the role of polymorphic variations in ABCB1, ABCC1, ABCC2, and ABCG2 in predicting hematological, nephrotoxicity, gastrointestinal, and hepatotoxicity.

Association of genetic polymorphisms of CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 with gefitinib-induced toxicities.

Dermatological, gastrointestinal and hepatic toxicities are the most common adverse events associated with gefitinib use. Gefitinib is metabolized by cytochrome P450. Inconsistent associations of single nucleotide genetic polymorphisms of CYP450 and gefitinib-induced adverse effects were reported. We aim to investigate the association between CYP450 genetic polymorphism and the development of gefitinib-associated adverse events. A retrospective cohort study of Chinese patients with metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations who received first-line gefitinib treatment was conducted. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of CYP2D6, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 were assayed using a multiplex SNP microarray. Risks of development of gefitinib-induced toxicities associated with different SNPs were determined. Among the 152 patients treated with gefitinib, 52 (34.2%) had gefitinib-induced hepatotoxicity, 113 (74.3%) had cutaneous reactions and 53 (34.9%) had gastrointestinal adverse effects. CYP2D6*41 CT, CYP2D6*10 AA and CYP3A4*1/*1G TT genotypes were significantly associated with hepatic, cutaneous and gastrointestinal adverse effects [odds ratio (OR) 3.773; (95% confidence interval {CI},1.046-13.610; P = 0.043), 3.368 (95% CI, 1.000-11.345; P = 0.050) and 20.000 (95% CI, 2.381-167.965; P = 0.006), respectively]. CYP2D6*41 CT, CYP2D6*10 AA and CYP3A4*1/*1G TT genotypes may be associated with increased risks of gefitinib-induced toxicities in the liver, skin and gastrointestinal tract.

Survival benefit of using pemetrexed for EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in a randomized phase III study comparing gefitinib to cisplatin plus docetaxel (WJTOG3405).

BACKGROUND: Pemetrexed is common cytotoxic chemotherapy among non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (non-Sq-NSCLC) patients; however, among epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive lung cancer, there is no clear evidence to support the efficacy of sequential treatment with pemetrexed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a post-hoc analysis of subsequent chemotherapies among 144 patients who received the post-protocol treatment in the phase III trial WJTOG 3405 comparing gefitinib to cisplatin plus docetaxel, and analyzed the effect of pemetrexed on overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Patients with treatment including pemetrexed exhibited significantly longer OS in comparison to those without pemetrexed; the median OS in the pemetrexed + and pemetrexed- patients were 40.7 months and 28.0 months, respectively (0.55 of HR [95% CI: 0.38-0.80, p = 0.0020]). On the other hand, other treatments, including docetaxel, TS-1 and paclitaxel showed no significant impact on OS. The multivariate analysis with a time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model showed that treatment including pemetrexed, as well as PS 0 and post-operative recurrence, were independent predictors of a good prognosis. Moreover, among patients who received at least four lines of prior treatment, pemetrexed + treatment also significantly prolonged OS in comparison to pemetrexed- treatment (median OS pemetrexed + vs. pemetrexed-: 44.4 months vs. 32.6 months; HR: 0.55 [95% CI: 0.31-0.94, p = 0.0290]). CONCLUSIONS: Sequential treatment including pemetrexed against EGFR-mutated NSCLC might be associated with a better outcome. It was considered that pemetrexed should be administered without fail as a sequential treatment to improve the prognosis of EGFR-mutated NSCLC as well as like EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Rhabdomyolysis Caused by Gefitinib Overdose.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are common therapeutic agents for EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. There has been no report of rhabdomyolysis caused by an overdose of EGFR-TKIs. We herein review the existing literature on the subject and report a rare case of rhabdomyolysis due to an overdose of gefitinib, an EGFR-TKI.

Randomized Phase III Study of Gefitinib Versus Cisplatin Plus Vinorelbine for Patients With Resected Stage II-IIIA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Mutation (IMPACT).

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of gefitinib as an adjuvant therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: IMPACT (WJOG6410L; University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000006252), a randomized, open-label, phase III study, included patients with completely resected pathologic stage II-III non-small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion or L858R) during September 2011 to December 2015. Patients were randomly assigned to receive gefitinib (250 mg once daily) for 24 months or cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1) plus vinorelbine (25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; cis/vin) once every 3 weeks for four cycles. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Overall, 234 patients were randomly assigned. Among 232 eligible patients (116 each; excluding two who withdrew consent), the median DFS was 35.9 and 25.1 months in the gefitinib and cis/vin groups, respectively. However, Kaplan-Meier curves crossed around 4 years after surgery with no statistically significant difference (stratified log-rank P = .63; hazard ratio by stratified Cox proportional hazards model = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.28). Overall survival (OS) was also not different (stratified log-rank P = .89; hazard ratio = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.65), with the 5-year OS rates being 78.0% and 74.6% in the gefitinib and cis/vin groups, respectively. Treatment-related deaths occurred in 0 and three patients in the gefitinib and cis/vin groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although adjuvant gefitinib appeared to prevent early relapse, it did not prolong DFS or OS. However, similar DFS and OS may justify adjuvant gefitinib in the selected patient subsets, especially those deemed ineligible for platinum-doublet adjuvant therapy; however, this was not a noninferiority trial.

A novel protein encoded by circASK1 ameliorates gefitinib resistance in lung adenocarcinoma by competitively activating ASK1-dependent apoptosis.

Acquired resistance to growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors limits the therapeutic benefits gained by EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients treated with gefitinib. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are novel noncoding RNAs implicated in the regulation of chemoresistance in malignancies. However, whether circRNAs participate in the development of EGFR-TKI resistance in LUAD remains to be clarified. Here, we report that circASK1 (hsa_circ_0007798) is significantly downregulated in gefitinib-resistant cells and enhances the gefitinib sensitivity of LUAD cells. Mechanistically, we identified a novel protein encoded by circASK1, ASK1-272a.a, which is essential for ASK1/JNK/p38 signaling activation and mediates the chemosensitivity-inducing effect of circASK1 in LUAD. Importantly, this novel isoform competes with ASK1 for binding to Akt1, therefore antagonizing Akt1-induced ASK1 phosphorylation and inactivation, leading to the activation of ASK1-induced apoptosis and alleviating gefitinib resistance. Moreover, increased YTHDF2-mediated endoribonucleolytic cleavage of m6A-modified circASK1 accounts for its downregulation in gefitinib-resistant cells. The clinical data and in vivo model further corroborated the suppressive effect of circASK1 and its encoded protein on gefitinib resistance. Our study provides a novel therapeutic target to overcome gefitinib resistance in LUAD patients.

[FOXC1 Knockdown Reverses Gefitinib Resistance in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the malignant tumor with the highest incidence and mortality in China, among which non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for about 80%. Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) targeted therapy has been playing an important role in treatment of NSCLC. However, unavoidable therapeutic resistance significantly limits the clinical efficacy of EGFR-TKI. As a key member of the forkhead box protein family, FOXC1 is aberrantly expressed in NSCLC and involved in NSCLC progression. The aim of this work is to investigate the effect and potential mechanism of FOXC1 on gefitinib resistance in NSCLC. METHODS: Western blot was performed to assess the expression of FOXC1 protein in HCC827/GR cells. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays were performed in human NSCLC tissues with gefitinib resistance. HCC827/GR cells were transfected with shRNA specifically targeting FOXC1 mRNA and stable cell lines were established. The effects of FOXC1 on cell viability and apoptosis were analyzed using a new methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium assay (MTS assay) and flow cytometry. Self-renewal ability was determined by mammosphere-formation analysis. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and Western blot were employed to detect the expression of SOX2, Nanog, OCT4 and CD133. Flow cytometry analysis were further used to detect the level of CD133. IHC assays were used to detect the levels of SOX2 and CD133 in NSCLC tissues with genfitiinb resistance. Correlations of the expressions of FOXC1, CD133 and SOX2 with each other in lung adenocarcinoma samples were analyzed based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. RESULTS: The expression of FOXC1 is significantly increased in HCC827/GR cells compared with HCC827 cells (P<0.05). IHC results showed FOXC1 was highly expressed in NSCLC tissues with gefitinib resisitance. Knockdown of FOXC1 significantly increased the sensitivity of HCC827/GR cells to gefitinib. The cell viability was decreased and the apoptosis was promoted (P<0.05). Moreover, FOXC1 knockdown apparently inhibited the expression of SOX2 and CD133, and decreased the mammosphere-formation capacity in HCC827/GR cells. In NSCLC tissues with gefitinib resistance, the expressions of SOX2 and CD133 were significantly higher compared with gefitinib-sensitive tissues (P<0.01). Meanwhile, the expressions of FOXC1, CD133 and SOX2 with each other were positively correlated (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: FOXC1 could increase gefitinib resitance in NSCLC, by which mechanism is related to the regulation of cancer stem cell properties.